Proquest Dissertations

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Proquest Dissertations A Case Study on the Discourse of Women's Conscientious Objection In Turkey By Eda Acara A Thesis Submitted to Saint Mary's University, Halifax, Nova Scotia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Women and Gender Studies. September, 2010, Halifax, Nova Scotia Copyright Eda Acara, 2010 Approved: Dr. Val Marie Johnson Supervisor Approved: Dr. Teresa Heffernan Secondary Reader Approved: Dr. ElifEkinAksit External Examiner Date: September 1, 2010. Library and Archives Bibliotheque et 1*1 Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-69905-8 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-69905-8 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduce, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par ('Internet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la these ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation. without the author's permission. In compliance with the Canadian Conformement a la loi canadienne sur la Privacy Act some supporting forms protection de la vie privee, quelques may have been removed from this formulaires secondaires ont ete enleves de thesis. cette these. While these forms may be included Bien que ces formulaires aient inclus dans in the document page count, their la pagination, il n'y aura aucun contenu removal does not represent any loss manquant. of content from the thesis. 1+1 Canada For the Memory of my grandmother, Sabriye Karacim (1924-2008) A Case Study on the Discourse of Women's Conscientious Objection In Turkey By Eda Acara Abstract This study explores militarism, nationalism and gender within the scope of the discourse of women's conscientious objection. I engage in a post-structuralist feminist analysis of the discourse of women conscientious objectors, in formal declarations and everyday practices, as a response to Turkish militarism and militarization processes in the post 1980 era. My analysis draws on the data I gathered from in depth interviews with nine women conscientious objectors as well as examination of women's and men's published declarations. September 1,2010 Acknowledgements I firstly would like to thank all of the women conscientious objectors who have and have not participated in this thesis project. Their words, declarations, experiences and the way they are seeing these experiences have been the most powerful inspiration for this thesis. Without them, this thesis would not exist. I would like to thank to my supervisor, Dr. Val Marie Johnson for her continuous motivation and patience in reading my drafts. Without her suggestions, inspiration and guidance, this thesis would not have been possible. I also would like to express my greatest appreciation to my defense Committee and proposal defense Committee members, Dr. Teresa Heffernan, Dr. Elif Ekin Aksit and Dr. Russell Westhaver for their suggestions and productive criticisms on my work. A special thanks goes to Dr. Ayca Kurtoglu and Dr. Yildiz Ecevit, at Middle East Technical University, Gender and Women's Studies Program for listening to me whenever I am confused with any piece of my interviews. Without their encouragement, inspiration and hard work, I could not have finished this thesis. I also would like to thank them for their deep and close friendship, their Gender and Women's Studies courses and the insightful readings of these courses that guided me throughout the thesis process. Besides my professors who helped me to bridge different feminisms overseas, I would like to thank my friends Ezgi Santas, Alptekin Top, Pinar Yuksel, Sevim Ozdemir, Ozge Karlik, Ulku Ozakin, Ash Coban, Bans Gencer and Ozlem Sanyildiz for their discussions with me about militarism and conscientious objection in Turkey, for their constant support towards this thesis and belief in me. I especially would like to thank Ozgtir Balkihc for his unending patience in calming me down at times of crisis and holding my hand in every step of the way while writing this thesis. I am finishing this thesis because I was able to speak every thought in my mind about non-violence, militarism and women conscientious objectors with him. I know that I abused him at times with my constant talking on my thesis, but without his patience and listening, this thesis would not have been possible. I started writing this thesis for my mother, Feriha Acara and all the other mothers who are absorbed in militarism. I am greatly indebted to her for sharing her own experiences and political thoughts about militarism and nationalism. Aspecial thanks goes to my father, Professor Altan Acara. His criticisms and insightful reading of my drafts were more than important for me in finishing this thesis. I would like to thank him for sharing 18 years of experience with Canadian academic life. I further would like to thank both of my parents for their love and efforts in bringing me up, preparing me for life and all of their pressure for me to finish this thesis. Also, I would like to thank my uncle, Professor AH Ceylan, aunt, Sebahat Ceylan and my beloved cousins Ece Ceylan-Eker and Efe Ceylan for their constant friendship and belief in me. They have always been a phone call away for listening to my troubles and giving me their support and understanding. I also would like to thank, my aunt, Dr. Fahrtinisa Boran for her constant enthusiasm for my thesis and women's issues. I personally would like to thank Mehmet Tarhan for his suggestions and sense of humour which lightened me up throughout this thesis process. I also would like to thank Feminist-Biz, all of their actions and members, for existing. Their feminist curiosity, creativity and passion, belief in struggle and collective discussions on hierarchies between different women have immensely contributed to this thesis. Let me say 'thank you' to the following people and organizations: my friend and colleague Jane Herbert for her friendship, creativity and enthusiasm for feminism, participants in the Mehmet Tarhan Campaign in Halifax, participants in the Enver Aydemir Campaign in Ankara, Lambda-Istanbul, Kaos-Gl (Ankara), Lilith Feminist Collective, Pembe Hayat, Ankara Kadin Platformu, Fe Journal, Amargi, Savas Karsitlan (War Resisters) and contributors to siddetsizlik.org (Non-Violence web site). Last but not the least I would like to thank Cynthia Enloe, Aysegul Altinay, Aksu Bora, Taml Bora, Nukhet Sirman, Elif Ekin Aksit, Handan Caglayan and Pinar Selek for their most valuable works on militarism and nationalism in Turkey. These works constituted the back bone of my thesis and gave me the hope that we can live peacefully and non-violently. I would like to dedicate this thesis to Hrant Dink, who was a victim of Turkish nationalism, and to the memory of Ulus Baker, who unexpectedly passed away in 2007.1 dedicate it to the transgender women who were victims of hate crimes in Turkey. Lastly, this thesis is for women and men of all colors, ethnicities and sexualities in Turkey who are struggling against militarism and nationalism in one way or another. Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction 1 Background on Conscientious Objection Movement in Turkey 2 Theoretical Background, Method and Evidence, Project Risks 8 Militarism as a Gendered Discourse 9 Discourses in Dialogue, Intervention and Social Transformation 10 Methodology and Evidence 12 Project Risks 15 Research Contributions of Thesis 17 Literature Review 18 Conscientious Objection and Women's Conscientious Objection 18 Militarism, Nationalism and Gender 20 Violence and Non-violence in Women's Movements and Discourse of Women Conscientious Objectors 25 Thesis Overview 27 Chapter 2 32 Conscientious Objection as Speech Genre 32 Dominant Understanding of Conscientious Objection 34 Making Sense of Conscientious Obj ection Through Declarations 42 Can women declare their conscientious objection when they are not conscripted? 50 Let's face it: Why do you declare your conscientious objection? 52 Soldier -Wife: Husmen's Kezban 53 If every Turk is born to be a soldier, who gives birth to these soldiers? 62 Strange Encounters of Gendered Narratives: The First Women Combat Pilot, Sabiha Gokcen, and Kurdish Woman Guerrilla, Zilan 66 Non-Violence and Militarism as a Gendered Discourse 78 Chapter 3 84 Militarism in Circulation 86 Militarism in the Left 87 Turkish Nationalism, Militarism and Internal Enemies 91 Gendering Militarism 102 Non-violence in Cycles Ill Non-violent Links: Personal and Political 119 Feminists and Non-violence 125 Conclusion: Marginalization of the Discourse of Women Conscientious Objectors 138 References 144 Appendix 1- Sample Interview Questions 158 Appendix 2- The number of conscientious objectors between 1989- 2008 159 Chapter 1: Introduction One of my friends became a conscientious objector in 2004. I thought that conscientious objection was limited to men who refuse to serve in the army, as in Turkey only men are obliged to serve in the military1 and conscientious objection has long been associated with men refusing to serve in the army (Moskos & Whiteclay 1993).
Recommended publications
  • Country Report for Use in Refugee Claims Based on Persecution Relating to Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity
    Turkey Country Report for use in refugee claims based on persecution relating to sexual orientation and gender identity Produced: January 20, 2010 Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity research – [email protected] International Human Rights Program University of Toronto This document was prepared by law students and highlights information about publicly-accessible country conditions available at the time it was prepared. It is not exhaustive, nor is it updated on a regular basis. The information provided here is not a substitute for legal advice or legal assistance, and the International Human Rights program at the University of Toronto, Faculty of Law cannot provide such advice or assistance. I: Introduction This report reveals that while homosexuality in Turkey is not considered a criminal act, Turkey remains a society where discrimination and persecution based on sexual orientation and gender identity exists both in civil society and in the military. Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) persons in Turkey face legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBT residents. This can be partially attributed to the conservative values embedded in Turkish society. In civil society, there are numerous reports of persons who have been victim of violence based on sexual orientation. LGBT Turks are vulnerable to physical and verbal harassment and abuse from police officers. Judges and prosecutors also share a dismissive attitude toward reports of persecution. Numerous media outlets have reported incidences of persecution based on sexual orientation, including murder. In the military context, Turkey has adopted a “don‟t ask, don‟t tell” policy, similar to that of the United States. Homosexuality is therefore permitted in the military context, so long as it does not pose a problem.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey: Military Service
    Country Policy and Information Note Turkey: Military service Version 2.0 September 2018 Preface Purpose This note provides country of origin information (COI) and analysis of COI for use by Home Office decision makers handling particular types of protection and human rights claims (as set out in the basis of claim section). It is not intended to be an exhaustive survey of a particular subject or theme. It is split into two main sections: (1) analysis of COI; and (2) COI. These are explained in more detail below. Analysis This section analyses the evidence relevant to this note – i.e. the COI section; refugee/human rights laws and policies; and applicable caselaw – by describing this and its inter-relationships, and provides an assessment on whether, in general: x A person is reasonably likely to face a real risk of persecution or serious harm x A person is able to obtain protection from the state (or quasi state bodies) x A person is reasonably able to relocate within a country or territory x Claims are likely to justify granting asylum, humanitarian protection or other form of leave, and x If a claim is refused, it is likely or unlikely to be certifiable as ‘clearly unfounded’ under section 94 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002. Decision makers must, however, still consider all claims on an individual basis, taking into account each case’s specific facts. Country of origin information The country information in this note has been carefully selected in accordance with the general principles of COI research as set out in the Common EU [European Union] Guidelines for Processing Country of Origin Information (COI), dated April 2008, and the Austrian Centre for Country of Origin and Asylum Research and Documentation’s (ACCORD), Researching Country Origin Information – Training Manual, 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD ...........................................................................................................................V ALBANIA ...............................................................................................................................2 Political developments ..........................................................................................................2 Police ill-treatment and torture .............................................................................................. 2 Conditions of detention.........................................................................................................2 Trafficking........................................................................................................................... 3 Domestic violence against women.......................................................................................... 3 BELARUS ...............................................................................................................................3 International concern about human rights............................................................................... 3 Freedom of expression, association and assembly (Update to AI Index: EUR01/012/2005) ........... 4 Prisoners of conscience (updates to AI Index: EUR 01/001/2004 and AI Index: EUR 49/017/2004) 5 Death penalty (update to AI Index: EUR 01/001/2004) ............................................................ 5 BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA.........................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey COIS Report November 2006
    COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION REPORT TURKEY 21 NOVEMBER 2006 RDS-IND COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION SERVICE TURKEY 21 NOVEMBER 2006 Contents Preface Latest News EVENTS IN TURKEY FROM 16 NOVEMBER 2006 TO 21 NOVEMBER 2006 REPORTS ON TURKEY PUBLISHED OR ACCESSED BETWEEN 16 NOVEMBER AND 21 NOVEMBER 2006 Paragraphs Background Information GEOGRAPHY .............................................................................................1.01 Map.................................................................................................1.06 ECONOMY .................................................................................................2.01 HISTORY....................................................................................................3.01 General Elections 2002 ................................................................3.01 European Union Reforms 2005-2006 ..........................................3.03 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS...........................................................................4.01 Terrorism in 2006..........................................................................4.01 CONSTITUTION...........................................................................................5.01 POLITICAL SYSTEM....................................................................................6.01 Introduction...................................................................................6.01 National Security Council (MGK) or (NSC).................................6.06 Local Government ........................................................................6.09
    [Show full text]
  • Country of Origin Information Report Turkey December 2007
    COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION REPORT TURKEY 31 DECEMBER 2007 Border & Immigration Agency COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION SERVICE TURKEY 31 DECEMBER 2007 Contents NB: this COI Report was reissued on 8 February 2008 to reinstate information about illegal political parties in Annex B, which was omitted from the original version of the December 2007 edition. Preface Latest News EVENTS IN TURKEY FROM 1 DECEMBER TO 31 DECEMBER 2007 Paragraphs Background Information 1. GEOGRAPHY ........................................................................................1.01 Map.................................................................................................1.05 Population .....................................................................................1.06 2. ECONOMY ............................................................................................2.01 3. HISTORY ..............................................................................................3.01 Recent History ..............................................................................3.01 General Elections 2007 ................................................................3.04 Presidential Election 2007 ...........................................................3.07 European Union Reforms 2007 ...................................................3.11 4. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS .....................................................................4.01 Terrorism in 2006-07.....................................................................4.01 5. CONSTITUTION
    [Show full text]
  • Conscientious Objection and Asylum 12
    Conscientious Objection in Turkey www.Connection-eV.orgConnection e.V. Imprint Title Download Editors Conscientious Objection English: www.Connection-eV.org/ Connection e.V. in Turkey pdfs/conscientious-objection-tur- Von-Behring-Str. 110 key-2021.pdf D-63075 Offenbach May 15, 2021 Tel.: +49 (0)69 8237 5534 Türkçe: www.Connection-eV.org/ [email protected] This booklet is published to the pdfs/vicdani-ret-turkiye-2021.pdf www.Connection-eV.org International Day of Conscien- tious Objection in a quadrilin- Deutsch: www.Connection-eV.org/ Union Pacifiste de France gual online edition. pdfs/kriegsdienstverweigerung- BP 40 196 tuerkei-2021.pdf F-75624 Paris Cedex 13 Cover picture Tel. +33 (0)1 4586 0875 Demonstration in Istanbul; Français: www.Connection-eV.org/ [email protected] Photo: VR-DER pdfs/objection-de-conscience-tur- www.unionpacifiste.org quie-2021.pdf Title design and Lay-out War Resisters’ International Rudi Friedrich, Connection e.V. 5 Caledonian Road GB-London, N1 9DX Tel: +44-20-7278 4040 [email protected] www.wri-irg.org 2 Conscientious Objection in Turkey, May 2021 Content Contents Introduction 4 Committee of Ministers of Council of Europe To the situation of conscientious objectors in Turkey 6 Ercan Jan Aktaş History of Conscientious Objection in Turkey 8 Rudi Friedrich Conscientious Objection and Asylum 12 Beran Mehmet İşçi How is it to be a conscientious objector from Turkey in Europe? 21 Halil Savda My experiences in the barracks 27 Mertcan Güler It all started with the Gezi protests 35 Onur Erden I refuse! 37 Franz Nadler 25 years of solidarity with conscientious objectors from Turkey 51 Association for Conscientious Objection 66 About the Editors 67 Conscientious Objection in Turkey, May 2021 3 Introduction Rudi Friedrich Introduction Connection e.V.
    [Show full text]