DOCSLIB.ORG

GRIP1 Regulates Synaptic Plasticity and Learning and Memory

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
GRIP1 Regulates Synaptic Plasticity and Learning and Memory GRIP1 regulates synaptic plasticity and learning and memory Han L. Tana,1, Shu-Ling Chiua,b,1, Qianwen Zhua,1, and Richard L. Huganira,2 aSolomon H. Snyder Department of Neuroscience and Kavli Neuroscience Discovery Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205; and bInstitute of Cellular and Organismic Biology, Academia Sinica, 11529 Taipei, Taiwan Contributed by Richard L. Huganir, August 18, 2020 (sent for review July 15, 2020; reviewed by Lin Mei and Peter Penzes) Hebbian plasticity is a key mechanism for higher brain functions, plasticity. For example, synapse-associated protein (SAP97) directly such as learning and memory. This form of synaptic plasticity primarily binds the GluA1 subunit and may promote AMPAR trafficking and involves the regulation of synaptic α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxa- LTP (11–13). Protein interacting with C-kinase 1 (PICK1), a zolepropionic acid receptor (AMPAR) abundance and properties, whereby GluA2 subunit-binding protein, functions to remove AMPAR AMPARs are inserted into synapses during long-term potentiation (LTP) from synapses and causes internalization of synaptic AMPARs, or removed during long-term depression (LTD). The molecular mecha- and deficits in Hebbian plasticity have been reported in PICK1 nisms underlying AMPAR trafficking remain elusive, however. Here we mutant mice (14, 15). show that glutamate receptor interacting protein 1 (GRIP1), an AMPAR- Glutamate receptor interacting protein (GRIP1) is a scaf- binding protein shown to regulate the trafficking and synaptic targeting folding protein that has seven postsynaptic density 95/discs large/ of AMPARs, is required for LTP and learning and memory. GRIP1 is zona occludens (PDZ) domains (16, 17). It interacts directly with Grip1 recruitedintosynapsesduringLTP,anddeletionof in neurons the C terminus of both GluA2 and GluA3 through the fourth blocks synaptic AMPAR accumulation induced by glycine-mediated depo- and fifth PDZ domains. GRIP1 has been shown to regulate the larization. In addition, Grip1 knockout mice exhibit impaired hippocampal surface expression and synaptic stabilization of AMPARs (18, LTP, as well as deficits in learning and memory. Mechanistically, we find 19). Our previous studies, as well as the work of others, have that phosphorylation of serine-880 of the GluA2 AMPAR subunit (GluA2- S880) is decreased while phosphorylation of tyrosine-876 on GluA2 suggested that there might be distinct pools of GRIP1 that dif- (GluA2-Y876) is elevated during chemically induced LTP. This enhances ferentially regulate AMPAR trafficking, although the predomi- the strength of the GRIP1–AMPAR association and, subsequently, the nate role of GRIP1 is to deliver AMPAR to the surface and NEUROSCIENCE – insertion of AMPARs into the postsynaptic membrane. Together, these stabilize them at synapses (20 23). Moreover, this regulation of results demonstrate an essential role of GRIP1 in regulating AMPAR traf- AMPAR trafficking by GRIP1 has been shown to be essential for ficking during synaptic plasticity and learning and memory. certain forms of synaptic plasticity, such as cerebellar LTD and homeostatic scaling (20, 24–26). Nevertheless, the need for synaptic plasticity | LTP | AMPA receptor | GRIP1 | learning and memory GRIP1 in the expression of Hebbian LTP is unknown. Here we investigated the function of GRIP1 in LTP and its he ability of the brain to learn, remember, and adapt requires role in learning and memory. We found that GRIP1 is recruited – Tchanges in synaptic connectivity (1, 2). Synapses are dynamic into synapses with AMPARs, and that the GRIP1 AMPAR in- and subject to cellular mechanisms that strengthen and weaken teraction is enhanced during LTP. Moreover, the loss of GRIP1 these neural connections throughout the lifespan of an organism. blocks the activity-induced accumulation of synaptic AMPARs. Grip1 Associative, or Hebbian, synaptic plasticity is widely thought to Finally, knockout (KO) mice exhibit learning and memory be a key cellular mechanism underlying information storage (3, deficits, likely due to the compromised plasticity at active synapses 4). In Hebbian plasticity, correlated action potential firing be- tween presynaptic and postsynaptic neurons causes long-term Significance potentiation (LTP) of synaptic strength. Conversely, uncorre- lated spiking between presynaptic and postsynaptic neurons in- AMPA receptors (AMPARs) are the principle postsynaptic glu- duces a long-term depression (LTD) at shared synapses (5). The tamate receptors mediating fast excitatory synaptic transmis- molecular mechanisms of Hebbian plasticity are highly complex sion in the brain. Regulation of synaptic AMPAR expression is and currently under intense scrutiny, but the detailed picture required for the expression of synaptic plasticity and normal remains incomplete. brain function. The turnover of AMPARs within synapses is Both LTP and LTD can be mediated by presynaptic mecha- highly dynamic, and the molecular mechanisms underlying nisms, such as enhanced or reduced neurotransmitter release AMPAR trafficking remain unclear. Here we report that GRIP1, probability, as well as by postsynaptic mechanisms, including an AMPAR-binding protein, plays an essential role in delivering changes in the sensitivity, properties, or abundance of postsyn- AMPAR into synapses during synaptic plasticity, particularly in aptic receptors (6, 7). The α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-iso- long-term potentiation. In addition, the deletion of Grip1 cau- xazolepropionic acid (AMPA)-type glutamate receptors (AMPARs) ses synaptic plasticity deficits and impaired learning and are the principle glutamate receptors that mediate the majority of fast memory. Our study reveals a mechanism through which GRIP1 excitatory synaptic transmission in the mammalian central nervous regulates AMPAR trafficking and impacts activity-dependent system, and the postsynaptic abundance of AMPARs is directly synaptic strengthening, as well as learning and memory. proportional to synaptic strength and modulated by a dynamic turnover of these receptors in response to synaptic activity (8, 9). Author contributions: H.L.T., S.-L.C., and R.L.H. designed research; H.L.T., S.-L.C., and Q.Z. Shuttling of AMPARs into and out of the postsynaptic membrane performed research; H.L.T., S.-L.C., and Q.Z. analyzed data; and H.L.T. wrote the paper. are the major mechanisms of NMDA receptor (NMDAR)-depen- Reviewers: L.M., Case Western Reserve University; and P.P., Northwestern University. dent LTP and LTD, respectively, at excitatory synapses (9). AMPARs The authors declare no competing interest. are tetrameric assemblies composed of GluA1-4 subunits, which are Published under the PNAS license. subjected to specialized posttranslational modification and protein in- 1H.L.T., S.-L.C., and Q.Z. contributed equally to this work. teractions that regulate AMPAR conductance and localization (9, 10). 2To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: [email protected]. Many AMPAR-interacting proteins play critical roles in synaptic First published September 18, 2020. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.2014827117 PNAS | October 6, 2020 | vol. 117 | no. 40 | 25085–25091 Downloaded by guest on September 27, 2021 in these animals. Taken together, our findings reveal an essential neurons (Fig. 2 A and B). Following cLTP induction, as expec- role of GRIP1 in synaptic plasticity and cognitive functions. ted, in control WT neurons, we observed a significant up- regulation of synaptic AMPARs. However, in Grip1 KO neu- Results rons, glycine treatment failed to induce synaptic enrichment of GRIP1 Is Recruited into Synapses in Response to Chemically Induced AMPARs (Fig. 2 A and C). Therefore, we concluded that GRIP1 LTP. To investigate the role of GRIP1 in regulating AMPAR is essential for AMPAR delivery to synapses during LTP. trafficking during LTP, we first examined GRIP1 expression and subcellular localization before and after LTP induction. Cultured Grip1 KO Mice Exhibit Impaired NMDAR-Dependent LTP. To further rat cortical neurons were treated with glycine to induce chemi- confirm the function of GRIP1 in LTP, we examined the re- cally mediated LTP (cLTP), a well-established stimulation pro- quirement for GRIP1 in LTP by performing intracellular whole- tocol mimicking NMDAR-dependent LTP (NMDAR-LTP) (27), cell electrophysiological recordings. We crossed floxed Grip1 fl/fl and postsynaptic densities (PSDs) were isolated. Consistent with (Grip1 ) mice with the pan-neuronal Nestin-Cre line to delete previous results, we saw significant increases in synaptic GluA1, Grip1 in neurons at embryonic stages (28). GRIP1 protein was fl/fl GluA2, and GluA3 AMPAR subunits after cLTP, while total undetectable in the hippocampus of Nestin-Grip1 mice at AMPAR subunit expression did not change (Fig. 1 A–C). In- postnatal day 21 (Fig. 3A); thus, we performed whole-cell re- triguingly, we observed a synaptic accumulation of GRIP1 protein cordings of LTP in acute hippocampus slices prepared from fl/fl fl/fl following cLTP even though the total GRIP1 level remained un- Nestin-Grip1 mice and control Grip1 littermates at 3 to 4 wk changed (Fig. 1 A–C), suggesting that GRIP1 is recruited into of age. We recorded from CA1 pyramidal neurons because LTP synapses with AMPARs during LTP. at Schaffer collateral-CA1 synapses is well known to be depen- Our previous study suggests that there might be two membrane- dent on NMDARs and expressed primarily by increased synaptic associated pools of GRIP1 with distinct
Load more

Recommended publications
  • High Resolution Genomic Scans Reveal Genetic Architecture Controlling Alcohol Preference in Bidirectionally Selected Rat Model
    Purdue University Purdue e-Pubs Department of Animal Sciences Faculty Department of Animal Sciences Publications 2016 High Resolution Genomic Scans Reveal Genetic Architecture Controlling Alcohol Preference in Bidirectionally Selected Rat Model Chiao-Ling Lo Indiana University School of Medicine Amy C. Lossie Indiana University School of Medicine Tiebing Liang Indiana University School of Medicine Yunlong Liu Indiana University School of Medicine Xiaoling Xuei Indiana University School of Medicine See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/anscpubs Recommended Citation Lo C-L, Lossie AC, Liang T, Liu Y, Xuei X, Lumeng L, et al. (2016) High Resolution Genomic Scans Reveal Genetic Architecture Controlling Alcohol Preference in Bidirectionally Selected Rat Model. PLoS Genet 12(8): e1006178. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pgen.1006178 This document has been made available through Purdue e-Pubs, a service of the Purdue University Libraries. Please contact [email protected] for additional information. Authors Chiao-Ling Lo, Amy C. Lossie, Tiebing Liang, Yunlong Liu, Xiaoling Xuei, Lawrence Lumeng, Feng C. Zhou, and William M. Muir This article is available at Purdue e-Pubs: http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/anscpubs/19 RESEARCH ARTICLE High Resolution Genomic Scans Reveal Genetic Architecture Controlling Alcohol Preference in Bidirectionally Selected Rat Model Chiao-Ling Lo1,2, Amy C. Lossie1,3¤, Tiebing Liang1,4, Yunlong Liu1,5, Xiaoling Xuei1,6, Lawrence Lumeng1,4, Feng C. Zhou1,2,7*, William
    [Show full text]
  • RUNNING HEAD: Low Homozygosity in Spanish Sheep
    1 RUNNING HEAD: Low homozygosity in Spanish sheep 2 3 Low genome-wide homozygosity in eleven Spanish ovine breeds 4 5 M.G. Luigi 1, T.F. Cardoso 1, 2 , A. Martínez 3, A. Pons 4, L.A. Bermejo 5, J. Jordana 6, J.V. 6 Delgado 3, S. Adán 7, E. Ugarte 8, J. J. Arranz 9, J. Casellas 6 and M. Amills 1, 6 * 7 8 1Department of Animal Genetics, Centre for Research in Agricultural Genomics 9 (CRAG), CSIC-IRTA-UAB-UB, Campus Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 10 Bellaterra 08193, Spain; 2CAPES Foundation, Ministry of Education of Brazil, Brasilia 11 D. F., 70.040-020, Brazil; 3Departamento de Genética, Universidad de Córdoba, 12 Córdoba 14071, Spain; 4Unitat de Races Autòctones, Servei de Millora Agrària i 13 Pesquera (SEMILLA), Son Ferriol 07198, Spain; 5Departamento de Ingeniería, 14 Producción y Economía Agrarias, Universidad de La Laguna, 38071 La Laguna, 15 Tenerife, Spain; 6Departament de Ciència Animal i dels Aliments, Facultat de 16 Veterinària, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra 08193, Spain; 7Federación 17 de Razas Autóctonas de Galicia (BOAGA), Pazo de Fontefiz, 32152 Coles. Ourense, 18 Spain; 8Neiker-Tecnalia, Campus Agroalimentario de Arkaute, apdo 46 E-01080 19 Vitoria-Gazteiz (Araba), Spain; 9Departamento de Producción Animal, Universidad de 20 León, León 24071, Spain. 21 22 Corresponding author: Marcel Amills. Department of Animal Genetics, Centre for 23 Research in Agricultural Genomics (CRAG), CSIC-IRTA-UAB-UB, Campus 24 Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra 08193, Spain. Tel. 34 93 5636600. E- 25 mail: [email protected]. 26 Abstract 27 28 The population of Spanish sheep has decreased from 24 to 15 million heads in 29 the last 75 years due to multiple social and economic factors.
    [Show full text]
  • GRIPAP1 / GRASP1 Antibody (N-Terminus) Goat Polyclonal Antibody Catalog # ALS14943
    10320 Camino Santa Fe, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: 858.875.1900 Fax: 858.622.0609 GRIPAP1 / GRASP1 Antibody (N-Terminus) Goat Polyclonal Antibody Catalog # ALS14943 Specification GRIPAP1 / GRASP1 Antibody (N-Terminus) - Product Information Application IHC Primary Accession Q4V328 Reactivity Human Host Goat Clonality Polyclonal Calculated MW 96kDa KDa GRIPAP1 / GRASP1 Antibody (N-Terminus) - Additional Information Gene ID 56850 Anti-GRIPAP1 / GRASP1 antibody IHC of Other Names human brain, cortex. GRIP1-associated protein 1, GRASP-1, GRIPAP1, KIAA1167 Target/Specificity Human GRIPAP1 / GRASP1. This antibody is expected to recognize both reported isoforms (as represented by NP_064522.3; NP_997555.1) Reconstitution & Storage Store at -20°C. Minimize freezing and thawing. Precautions GRIPAP1 / GRASP1 Antibody (N-Terminus) is for research use only and not for use in Anti-GRIPAP1 / GRASP1 antibody IHC of diagnostic or therapeutic procedures. human tonsil. GRIPAP1 / GRASP1 Antibody (N-Terminus) GRIPAP1 / GRASP1 Antibody (N-Terminus) - Protein Information - References Bechtel S.,et al.BMC Genomics Name GRIPAP1 (HGNC:18706) 8:399-399(2007). Ross M.T.,et al.Nature 434:325-337(2005). Synonyms KIAA1167 Hirosawa M.,et al.DNA Res. 6:329-336(1999). Function Lubec G.,et al.Submitted (DEC-2008) to Regulates the endosomal recycling back to UniProtKB. the neuronal plasma membrane, possibly Holt L.J.,et al.Nucleic Acids Res. by connecting early and late recycling 28:72-72(2000). endosomal domains and promoting Page 1/2 10320 Camino Santa Fe, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: 858.875.1900 Fax: 858.622.0609 segregation of recycling endosomes from early endosomal membranes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ras1–Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Signal Transduction Pathway Regulates Synaptic Plasticity Through Fasciclin II-Mediated Cell Adhesion
    The Journal of Neuroscience, April 1, 2002, 22(7):2496–2504 The Ras1–Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Signal Transduction Pathway Regulates Synaptic Plasticity through Fasciclin II-Mediated Cell Adhesion Young-Ho Koh, Catalina Ruiz-Canada, Michael Gorczyca, and Vivian Budnik Department of Biology, Neuroscience and Behavior Program, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003 Ras proteins are small GTPases with well known functions in junction, and modification of their activity levels results in an cell proliferation and differentiation. In these processes, they altered number of synaptic boutons. Gain- or loss-of-function play key roles as molecular switches that can trigger distinct mutations in Ras1 and MAPK reveal that regulation of synapse signal transduction pathways, such as the mitogen-activated structure by this signal transduction pathway is dependent on protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, the phosphoinositide-3 kinase fasciclin II localization at synaptic boutons. These results pro- pathway, and the Ral–guanine nucleotide dissociation stimula- vide evidence for a Ras-dependent signaling cascade that tor pathway. Several studies have implicated Ras proteins in regulates fasciclin II-mediated cell adhesion at synaptic termi- the development and function of synapses, but the molecular nals during synapse growth. mechanisms for this regulation are poorly understood. Here, we demonstrate that the Ras–MAPK pathway is involved in syn- Key words: mitogen-activated protein kinase; Ras; neuro- aptic plasticity at the Drosophila larval neuromuscular junction. muscular junction; internalization; cell adhesion; synapse Both Ras1 and MAPK are expressed at the neuromuscular plasticity Synapse formation and modification are highly complex processes The Drosophila neuromuscular junction (NMJ) is a powerful that include the activation of gene expression, cytoskeletal reor- system to understand the mechanisms underlying synaptic plas- ganization, and signal transduction activation (Koh et al., 2000; ticity.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulation of Synaptic Structure and Function at the Drosophila Neuromuscular Junction
    Regulation of synaptic structure and function at the Drosophila neuromuscular junction by Aline D. Blunk Dipl. Biol., Freie Universitat Berlin (2006) Submitted to the Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctorate of Philosophy in Neuroscience at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ss I TE September 2013 @ 2013 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. All rights reserved Author ......................... .................................. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences August, 2013 Certified by ................. ................................................ I % Dr. J. Troy Littleton Professor of Biology Thesis Supervisor Accepted by... .......-------................. ......... .Dr. Mat ilson Sherman Fairchild Professor of Neuroscience Director of the Graduate Program 2 Regulation of synaptic structure and function at the Drosophila neuromuscular junction by Aline D. Blunk Submitted to the Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences on August 21, 2013 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctorate of Philosophy in Neuroscience Abstract Neuronal communication requires a spatially organized synaptic apparatus to coordinate neurotransmitter release from synaptic vesicles and activation of postsynaptic receptors. Structural remodeling of synaptic connections can strengthen neuronal communication and synaptic efficacy during development and behavioral plasticity. Here, I describe experimental approaches that have revealed how the actin
    [Show full text]
  • Role of Cell Adhesion Molecules in Synaptic Plasticity and Memory
    cbb506.qxd 10/27/1999 7:57 AM Page 549 549 The role of cell adhesion molecules in synaptic plasticity and memory Sachiko Murase and Erin M Schuman∗ Studies in the past few years suggest that cell adhesion roles in the activity-dependent rearrangement of synaptic molecules may play signaling as well as structural roles at adult structures in the adult brain. In this review, we highlight synapses during plasticity. The observation that many adhesion recent studies implicating cell adhesion molecules as molecules are expressed both pre-synaptically and post- mediators of synaptic and behavioral plasticity. The possi- synaptically raises the possibility that information about ble mechanism(s) by which these molecules participate in synaptic activity might simultaneously be communicated to plasticity is also discussed. both sides of the synapse, circumventing the need for distinct anterograde and retrograde messengers. Involvement of cell adhesion molecules in synaptic plasticity and learning Addresses Synapses, the points of contact between neurons, undergo Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Division of Biology, California dynamic changes in their strength, enduring from minutes Institute of Technology, 1200 East California Boulevard, Pasadena, to hours to days. The presence of adhesion molecules in or CA 91125, USA near the synaptic cleft raises the possibility that, in addi- ∗e-mail: [email protected] tion to serving as recognition molecules for Current Opinion in Cell Biology 1999, 11:549–553 synaptogenesis, they may participate in initiating and 0955-0674/99/$ — see front matter © 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. maintaining synaptic changes. One prominent form of All rights reserved. synaptic change exhibited by many different synapses is long-term potentiation (LTP), an enduring enhancement Abbreviations apCAM Aplysia NCAM homolog of excitatory synaptic transmission that occurs following HAV His–Ala–Val brief episodes of synaptic activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Dendritic Spine Instability in a Mouse Model of CDKL5 Disorder Is
    Author's Accepted Manuscript Dendritic spine instability in a mouse model of CDKL5 disorder is rescued by IGF-1 Grazia Della Sala, Elena Putignano, Gabriele Chelini, Riccardo Melani, Eleonora Calcagno, Gian Michele Ratto, Elena Amendola, Cornelius T. Gross, Maurizio Giustetto, Tommaso Pizzor- usso www.sobp.org/journal PII: S0006-3223(15)00727-1 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.08.028 Reference: BPS12663 To appear in: Biological Psychiatry Cite this article as: Grazia Della Sala, Elena Putignano, Gabriele Chelini, Riccardo Melani, Eleonora Calcagno, Gian Michele Ratto, Elena Amendola, Cornelius T. Gross, Maurizio Giustetto, Tommaso Pizzorusso, Dendritic spine instability in a mouse model of CDKL5 disorder is rescued by IGF-1, Biological Psychiatry, http: //dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.08.028 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting galley proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. Della Sala et al., Dendritic Spine Instability in a Mouse Model of CDKL5 Disorder is rescued by IGF-1 Grazia Della Sala* 1, Elena Putignano* 2, Gabriele Chelini 1, Riccardo Melani 1, Eleonora Calcagno 3, Gian Michele Ratto 4, Elena Amendola 5, Cornelius T. Gross 5, Maurizio Giustetto £3, Tommaso Pizzorusso £1,2 1- Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health NEUROFARBA University of Florence, Area San Salvi – Pad.
    [Show full text]
  • Redistribution and Stabilization of Cell Surface Glutamate Receptors During Synapse Formation
    The Journal of Neuroscience, October 1, 1997, 17(19):7351–7358 Redistribution and Stabilization of Cell Surface Glutamate Receptors during Synapse Formation Andrew L. Mammen,1,2 Richard L. Huganir,1,2 and Richard J. O’Brien1,2,3 1Howard Hughes Medical Institute, and Departments of 2Neuroscience and 3Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205 Although the regulation of neurotransmitter receptors during addition of N-GluR1 to live neurons. As cultures mature and synaptogenesis has been studied extensively at the neuromus- synapses form, there is a redistribution of surface GluR1 into cular junction, little is known about the control of excitatory clusters at excitatory synapses where it appears to be immo- neurotransmitter receptors during synapse formation in central bilized. The change in the distribution of GluR1 is accompanied neurons. Using antibodies against extracellular N-terminal (N- by an increase in both the half-life of the receptor and the GluR1) and intracellular C-terminal (C-GluR1) domains of the percentage of the total pool of GluR1 that is present on the cell AMPA receptor subunit GluR1, combined with surface biotiny- surface. Blockade of postsynaptic AMPA and NMDA receptors lation and metabolic labeling studies, we have characterized had no effect on the redistribution of GluR1. These results begin the redistribution and metabolic stabilization of the AMPA re- to characterize the events regulating the distribution of AMPA ceptor subunit GluR1 during synapse formation in culture. Be- receptors and demonstrate similarities between synapse for- fore synapse formation, GluR1 is distributed widely, both on the mation at the neuromuscular junction and at excitatory syn- surface and within the dendritic cytoplasm of these neurons.
    [Show full text]
  • Synaptic Cell Adhesion
    Downloaded from http://cshperspectives.cshlp.org/ on September 28, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Synaptic Cell Adhesion Markus Missler1, Thomas C. Su¨dhof2, and Thomas Biederer3 1Department of Anatomy and Molecular Neurobiology, Westfa¨lische Wilhelms-University, 48149 Mu¨nster, Germany 2Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305 3Department of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520 Correspondence: [email protected] Chemical synapses are asymmetric intercellular junctions that mediate synaptic trans- mission. Synaptic junctions are organized by trans-synaptic cell adhesion molecules bridg- ing the synaptic cleft. Synaptic cell adhesion molecules not only connect pre- and postsyn- aptic compartments, but also mediate trans-synaptic recognition and signaling processes that are essential for the establishment, specification, and plasticity of synapses. A growing number of synaptic cell adhesion molecules that include neurexins and neuroligins, Ig- domain proteins such as SynCAMs, receptor phosphotyrosine kinases and phosphatases, and several leucine-rich repeat proteins have been identified. These synaptic cell adhesion molecules use characteristic extracellular domains to perform complementary roles in or- ganizing synaptic junctions that are only now being revealed. The importance of synaptic cell adhesion molecules for brain function is highlighted by recent findings implicating several such molecules, notably neurexins and neuroligins, in schizophrenia and autism. SYNAPTIC CELL ADHESION tural studies have shown that the material cross- ing the synaptic cleft is periodically organized ynapses constitute highly specialized sites of and composed of highly concentrated proteina- Sasymmetric cell–cell adhesion and intercel- ceous material (Lucic et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Reactive Astrocyte Nomenclature, Definitions, and Future Directions 2 3 4 Carole Escartin 1*# , Elena Galea 2,3 *# , András Lakatos 4,5 §, James P
    1 Reactive astrocyte nomenclature, definitions, and future directions 2 3 4 Carole Escartin 1*# , Elena Galea 2,3 *# , András Lakatos 4,5 §, James P. O’Callaghan 6§, 5 Gabor C. Petzold 7,8 §, Alberto Serrano-Pozo 9,10 §, Christian Steinhäuser 11 §, Andrea Volterra 12 §, 6 Giorgio Carmignoto 13,14 §, Amit Agarwal 15 , Nicola J. Allen 16 , Alfonso Araque 17 , Luis Barbeito 18 , 7 Ari Barzilai 19 , Dwight E. Bergles 20 , Gilles Bonvento 1, Arthur M. Butt 21 , Wei-Ting Chen 22 , 8 Martine Cohen-Salmon 23 , Colm Cunningham 24 , Benjamin Deneen 25 , Bart De Strooper 22,26 , 9 Blanca Díaz-Castro 27 , Cinthia Farina 28 , Marc Freeman 29 , Vittorio Gallo 30 , James E. Goldman 31 , 10 Steven A. Goldman 32,33 , Magdalena Götz 34,35 , Antonia Gutiérrez 36,37 , Philip G. Haydon 38 , 11 Dieter H. Heiland 39,40 , Elly M. Hol 41 , Matthew G. Holt 42 , Masamitsu Iino 43 , 12 Ksenia V. Kastanenka 44 , Helmut Kettenmann 45 , Baljit S. Khakh 46 , Schuichi Koizumi 47 , 13 C. Justin Lee 48 , Shane A. Liddelow 49 , Brian A. MacVicar 50 , Pierre Magistretti 51,52 , 14 Albee Messing 53 , Anusha Mishra 54 , Anna V. Molofsky 55 , Keith K. Murai 56 , Christopher M. 15 Norris 57 , Seiji Okada 58 , Stéphane H.R. Oliet 59 , João F. Oliveira 60,61,62 , Aude Panatier 59 , Vladimir 16 Parpura 63, Marcela Pekna 64 , Milos Pekny 65 , Luc Pellerin 66, Gertrudis Perea 67, Beatriz G. Pérez- 17 Nievas 68 , Frank W. Pfrieger 69 , Kira E. Poskanzer 70 , Francisco J. Quintana 71 , Richard M. 18 Ransohoff 72, Miriam Riquelme-Perez 1, Stefanie Robel 73, Christine R.
    [Show full text]
  • A Labile Component of AMPA Receptor-Mediated Synaptic Transmission Is Dependent on Microtubule Motors, Actin, and N-Ethylmaleimide-Sensitive Factor
    The Journal of Neuroscience, June 15, 2001, 21(12):4188–4194 A Labile Component of AMPA Receptor-Mediated Synaptic Transmission Is Dependent on Microtubule Motors, Actin, and N-Ethylmaleimide-Sensitive Factor Chong-Hyun Kim and John E. Lisman Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 02454 Glutamate receptor channels are synthesized in the cell body, was found by using an actin inhibitor (phalloidin) or an inhibitor are inserted into intracellular vesicles, and move to dendrites of NSF (N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive fusion protein)/GluR2 inter- where they become incorporated into synapses. Dendrites con- action. We then examined whether these effects were indepen- tain abundant microtubules that have been implicated in the dent or occluded each other. We found that a combination of vesicle-mediated transport of ion channels. We have examined phalloidin and NSF/GluR2 inhibitor reduced the response to how the inhibition of microtubule motors affects synaptic trans- ϳ30% of baseline level, an effect only slightly larger than that mission. Monoclonal antibodies that inactivate the function of produced by each agent alone. The addition of microtubule dynein or kinesin were introduced into hippocampal CA1 pyra- motor inhibitors to this combination produced no further inhi- midal cells through a patch pipette. Both antibodies substan- bition. We conclude that there are two components of AMPA tially reduced the AMPA receptor-mediated responses within 1 receptor-mediated transmission; one is a labile pool sensitive to hr but had no effect on the NMDA receptor-mediated response. NSF/GluR2 inhibitors, actin inhibitors, and microtubule motor Heat-inactivated antibody or control antibodies had a much inhibitors.
    [Show full text]
  • GRIP1 Gene Glutamate Receptor Interacting Protein 1
    GRIP1 gene glutamate receptor interacting protein 1 Normal Function The GRIP1 gene provides instructions for making a protein that is able to attach (bind) to other proteins and is important for moving (targeting) proteins to the correct location in cells. For example, the GRIP1 protein targets two proteins called FRAS1 and FREM2 to the correct region of the cell so that they can form a group of proteins known as the FRAS/FREM complex. This complex is found in the thin, sheet-like structures ( basement membranes) that separate and support the cells of many tissues. The complex is particularly important during development before birth. One of its roles is to anchor the top layer of skin by connecting the basement membrane of the top layer to the layer of skin below. The FRAS/FREM complex is also involved in the proper development of certain other organs and tissues, including the kidneys, although the mechanism is unclear. In addition, the GRIP1 protein targets necessary proteins to the junctions (synapses) between nerve cells (neurons) in the brain where cell-to-cell communication occurs. GRIP1 may also be involved in the development of neurons. Health Conditions Related to Genetic Changes Fraser syndrome At least two GRIP1 gene mutations have been found to cause Fraser syndrome; these mutations are involved in a small percentage of cases of this condition. Fraser syndrome affects development before birth and is characterized by eyes that are completely covered by skin (cryptophthalmos), fusion of the skin between the fingers and toes (cutaneous syndactyly), and abnormalities of the kidneys and other organs and tissues.
    [Show full text]