DOCSLIB.ORG

Climate Action Tracker Brown to Green: G20 Transition to a Low Carbon Economy Usa

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Climate Action Tracker Brown to Green: G20 Transition to a Low Carbon Economy Usa CLIMATE ACTION TRACKER BROWN TO GREEN: G20 TRANSITION TO A LOW CARBON ECONOMY USA This country prole assesses the USA’s past, present and indications of future performance towards a low-carbon economy by evaluating emissions, decarbonisation, climate policy performance and climate nance. The prole summarises the respective ndings from, amongst others, the Climate Change Performance Index (CCPI, operated by Germanwatch and Climate Action Network Europe), the Climate Action Tracker (CAT, operated by Climate Analytics, NewClimate Institute, Ecofys and Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research), and analyses from the Overseas Development Institute (ODI). Human Development Index Share of global GHG emissions Share of GDP GHG emissions per capita global GDP per capita (tCO e/cap) 0.91 2 G20 average 20.2 8.7 12% $ $ $ 0 0.82 1 G20 G20 average average 16.7% $ 45,664 $ 15,071 Source: UNDP, data for 2015 Source: World Bank Indicators, data for 2012 Source: IEA, data for 2013 GREENHOUSE GAS (GHG) EMISSIONS 8000 25 Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions increased in the 7000 United States until 2007, have declined since, but 6000 20 are likely to increase again from 6,487 MtCO2e e/a) 2 5000 /capita) (2012) to ~6,900 MtCO e in 2030. Land use, land-use 2 2 4000 15 change and forestry (LULUCF) emissions amount to 3000 -941.5 MtCO2e. Per capita emissions, at 16 tCO2, are 2000 10 the second highest in the G20, nearly three times 1000 the G20 average, but have fallen slightly since 2005. Total emissions (MtCO Total In the CCPI, the US is a very poor performer on its 0 5 Emissions per capita (tCO Emissions per capita emissions levels, but also shows a trend towards -1000 fewer emissions. -2000 0 Composition of 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014 2018 2022 2026 2030 GHG emissions Historic emissions Energy-related Energy-related (excluding forestry) CO emissions 2 CO2 emissions per capita CO2* 79% G20 average of energy-related N O Current policy emissions projections Historic forestry 2 7% CO emissions per capita (excluding forestry) emissions/removals 2 CH4 10% F-Gases 3% CCPI evaluation of emissions level and trend CO2 emissions Level from forestry -18% Weak trend *CO emissions incl. LULUCF very poor poor medium good very good Strong trend 2 Source: Anex I countries: UNFCCC (2015); Non-Annex I countries: IEA (2014) and CAT (2015) Sources: Past energy related emissions from the Climate Change Performance Index (CCPI); past non-energy and future emissions projections from the Climate Action Tracker (CAT). CCPI calculations are primary based on the most recent IEA data; CAT calculations are based on national policies and country communications. Brown to green: G20 transition to a low carbon economy USA - Country Prole DECARBONISATION Energy intensity of the economy 12 Energy intensity of the US economy (TPES/GDP) has 10 developed in line with the G20 average, gradually decreasing over the last decades. The level is still 8 relatively high and the CCPI ranks the USA economy’s 6 energy intensity as poor, with a positive trend. 4 (MJ per 2005 US dollar) (MJ per 2005 US 2 Total Primary Supply per GDP PPP Energy Total 0 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 Energy intensity CCPI evaluation of energy intensity of GDP Level Average energy intensity in G20 Weak trend Source: CCPI, 2016 very poor poor medium good very good Strong trend Carbon intensity of the energy sector 70 CO2 emissions per primary energy supply (CO2/TPES) 60 were slightly above the average G20 level until 2006 /TJ) 2 50 when they decreased to 56 tCO2/TJ. It is expected this will only be temporary, and carbon intensity will reach and 40 remain on 2006 levels until 2030, exceeding the minimal per TPES (tCO 2 30 value for the 2-degree benchmark corridor. The CCPI ranks the USA’s carbon intensity level as relatively poor, 20 but recognises an improving trend. Tonnes of CO Tonnes 10 0 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014 2018 2022 2026 2030 Carbon intensity Average carbon intensity (past trend) in G20 CCPI evaluation of carbon intensity of energy sector Level Carbon intensity Global benchmark (current policy projection) for a 2°C pathway Weak trend Sources: Past: CCPI; future projections: CAT very poor poor medium good very good Strong trend Share of coal in Total Primary Energy Supply (TPES) 40% 25000000 After being close to 25% until 2008, the share 35% of coal in primary energy supply dropped to 20000000 30% 20% in 2012. It is assumed the share will remain on this level until 2030, which would 25% 15000000 exceed the minimal value for the 2-degree 20% benchmark corridor. 15% 10000000 Total coal in TPES [TJ] coal Total 10% 5000000 5% 0 0 Evaluation of coal share in TPES 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014 2018 2022 2026 2030 % of coal (past trend) % of coal (current policy Total coal consumption (TJ) projections) poor medium good Average % of coal in G20 Global benchmark for a 2°C pathway (min & max) Source: CAT Source: own evaluation Brown to green: G20 transition to a low carbon economy USA - Country Prole Renewable energy in TPES and electricity sector 18% 7000000 16% 6000000 14% 5000000 The share of renewable energy in electricity 12% reached an all-time low in 2001, at 7%, but has 10% 4000000 since increased to 12% in 2012. Future projections show that a further increase - up to a level of 16% - 8% 3000000 can be expected. With only approximately 6% of 6% 2000000 renewable energy in the country’s primary energy 4% supply, the US is far below the G20 average and is 1000000 in TPES [TJ] energy renewable Total accordingly ranked as relatively poor by the CCPI. 2% However, a positive trend can be observed. 0 0 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014 2018 2022 2026 2030 % of renewable energy % of renewable energy in electricity (past trend) in TPES (past trend) % of renewable energy G20 average % of in electricity renewable energy in TPES (current policy projections) Total renewable energy consumption (TJ) CCPI evaluation of renewable share in TPES Level Sources: CCPI and CAT Weak trend very poor poor medium good very good Strong trend Electricity demand per capita Emissions intensity of the electricity sector In the US, electricity demand per capita is very high, increasing The carbon intensity of the USA's electricity sector has been from around 10,000 kWh per capita in 1990 to more than slightly below the G20 average since 2009, and projections see 12,000 kWh per capita in the 2000’s. Future projections it only slightly decreasing in the future. Electricity emissions estimate this to stay relatively stable at slightly below the intensity is nearly twice that of Denmark, the country with the 12,000 kWh mark until 2030, which is still three times the lowest value of all those countries globally, that neither have current G20 average. large hydro potential nor nuclear power. 14000 700 /kWh] 12000 2 600 10000 500 8000 400 6000 300 4000 200 2000 100 Electricity [kWh/cap] demand per capita 0 0 Emissions intensity of electricity [gCO 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014 2018 2022 2026 2030 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014 2018 2022 2026 2030 Electricity demand per capita Electricity demand per capita Emissions intensity Good practice benchmark: (past trend) (current policy projections) (past trend) without nuclear or large hydro potential (Denmark) Average electricity demand Average emissions intensity in G20 per capita in G20 Good practice benchmark: Emissions intensity with large hydro potential (Norway) (current policy projections) Source: CAT, 2015 Source: CAT, 2015 Evaluation of the electricity emission intensity poor medium good Source: own evaluation Brown to green: G20 transition to a low carbon economy USA - Country Prole CLIMATE POLICY PERFORMANCE Checklist of the climate policy framework Climate policy evaluation by experts Since 2008, the US policy performance has Low emissions development plan for 2050* improved, and the CCPI sees it reaching an average level for the rst time. Experts emphasise recent 2050 GHG emissions target positive developments such as the rejection of an oil-sands pipeline and eorts to push international Building codes, standards and incentives for low-emissions options climate negotiations. The USA has requested the UNFCCC not to publish its GHG emissions Support scheme for renewables in the power sector development data. Emissions performance standards for cars The CCPI evaluates a country‘s performance in national and international climate policy through feedback from national energy and climate experts. Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) very good Carbon tax * Understood as decarbonisation plans and not specically as the plans called for in good the Paris Agreement Source: Climate Policy Database, 2016 medium poor CCPI evaluation of climate policy very poor CCPI 2008 CCPI 2009 CCPI 2010 CCPI 2011 CCPI 2012 CCPI 2013 CCPI 2014 CCPI 2015 CCPI 2016 very poor poor medium good very good CCPI edition National International Source: CCPI, 2016 Compatibility of national climate targets (INDCs) with a 2°C scenario 8000 The USA submitted its Intended Nationally Max Min Determined Contribution (INDC) on 31 March 2015 6000 where it commits to reduce net GHG emissions by 26–28% below 2005 in 2025, including Land Use, e/a) Max 2 4000 Min Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF). That is equivalent to a reduction of 24–31% below 2005 2000 levels, or 12–19% below 1990 levels, excluding Max LULUCF. Based on this target, and taking into 0 account the eect of LULUCF accounting, CAT rates Total emissions (MtCO Total the US “medium”. The target is not yet consistent -2000 Min with limiting warming to below 2°C, unless other countries make much deeper reductions and -4000 comparably greater eort than the USA.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Working Paper
    WORKING PAPER The Sustainable Development Goals: Will they deliver climate compatible development for vulnerable countries? By Helen Picot, with Nicholas Moss September 2014 About this Working Paper The Climate and Development Knowledge Network (CDKN) assists developing countries to design and deliver climate compatible development, and to amplify the voices of the poorest and most climate-vulnerable countries in the international climate negotiations. What is climate compatible development? Climate compatible development is defined as “a ‘development first’ approach that minimises the harm caused by climate impacts while maximising the many human development opportunities presented by a low-emissions, more resilient, future”.1 In other words, development, climate adaptation and climate mitigation should go hand-in-hand, and one should not undermine the others. About the authors Helen Picot is a CDKN Negotiations Support Project Manager, based in PwC’s Sustainability and Climate Change practice. Nicholas Moss manages CDKN activities related to the sustainable development goals, also at PwC. Thanks to Green Ink for copy editing and layout. Reviewers This paper would not have been possible without the valuable insights of CDKN colleagues working on climate compatible development and the sustainable development goals. Those who have strengthened this paper with their review comments include: Sam Bickersteth, Mairi Dupar, Ari Huhtala, Simon Maxwell, Andrew Scott, Kiran Sura and Christopher Webb. Special thanks go to Jessica Darmawan, Timothy
    [Show full text]
  • T&E, European Federation for Transport and Environment
    Introducing the GREEN 9 group of environmental NGOs active at EU level Introducing the Green 9 group of ||environmental NGOs active at EU level 2 Introducing the Green 9 group of environmental NGOs active at EU level Foreword Public opinion polls consistently show that European citizens are deeply concerned about the environment. The environment is an area where EU decision-makers can take action to bridge the gap between European institutions and citizens, to change people’s lives for the better. River pollution, climate change and wildlife decline are environmental problems that do not respect national boundaries. It makes sense to tackle these issues with laws and regulations at EU level. Despite the progress made in EU environmental policy, much needs to be done dur- ing the term of the current European Parliament and European Commission to inte- grate the environment into all EU policies. This is vital to ensure that the principle of ‘sustainable development’ is effectively applied in practice. Widespread public concern over the state of the environment has led to a continuous growth in the membership of environmental non-governmental organisations in Europe in recent years. Membership of the nine leading environmental organisations active at EU level is now estimated to be over 20 million people. This booklet gives EU decision-makers a short overview of the activities of the nine leading environmental organisations active at EU level - ‘the Green 9’ - together with their contact details. We hope that you will contact us if you need further information on what we do. We look forward to working with you.
    [Show full text]
  • C H a P T E R Iv
    CHAPTER IV Moving forward: youth taking action and making a difference The combined acumen and involvement of all individuals, from regular citizens to scientific experts, will be needed as the world moves forward in implementing climate change miti- gation and adaptation measures and promot- ing sustainable development. Young people must be prepared to play a key role within this context, as they are the ones who will live to R IV experience the long-term impact of today’s crucial decisions. TE The present chapter focuses on the partici- pation of young people in addressing climate change. It begins with a review of the various mechanisms for youth involvement in environ- HAP mental advocacy within the United Nations C system. A framework comprising progressive levels of participation is then presented, and concrete examples are provided of youth in- volvement in climate change efforts around the globe at each of these levels. The role of youth organizations and obstacles to partici- pation are also examined. PROMOTING YOUTH ture. In addition to their intellectual contribution and their ability to mobilize support, they bring parTICipaTION WITHIN unique perspectives that need to be taken into account” (United Nations, 1995, para. 104). THE UNITED NATIONS The United Nations has long recognized the Box IV.1 importance of youth participation in decision- making and global policy development. Envi- The World Programme of ronmental issues have been assigned priority in Action for Youth on the recent decades, and a number of mechanisms importance of participation have been established within the system that The World Programme of Action for enables youth representatives to contribute to Youth recognizes that the active en- climate change deliberations.
    [Show full text]
  • Results 2020 Jan Burck, Ursula Hagen, Niklas Höhne, Leonardo Nascimento, Christoph Bals CCPI • Results 2020 Germanwatch, Newclimate Institute & Climate Action Network
    Climate Change CCPI Performance Index Results 2020 Jan Burck, Ursula Hagen, Niklas Höhne, Leonardo Nascimento, Christoph Bals CCPI • Results 2020 Germanwatch, NewClimate Institute & Climate Action Network Imprint Germanwatch – Bonn Office Authors: Kaiserstr. 201 Jan Burck, Ursula Hagen, Niklas Höhne, D-53113 Bonn, Germany Leonardo Nascimento, Christoph Bals Ph.: +49 (0) 228 60492-0 With support of: Fax: +49 (0) 228 60492-19 Pieter van Breenvoort, Violeta Helling, Anna Wördehoff, Germanwatch – Berlin Office Gereon tho Pesch Stresemannstr. 72 Editing: D-10963 Berlin, Germany Anna Brown, Janina Longwitz Ph.: +49 (0) 30 28 88 356-0 Fax: +49 (0) 30 28 88 356-1 Maps: Violeta Helling E-mail: [email protected] www.germanwatch.org Design: Dietmar Putscher Coverphoto: shutterstock/Tupungato December 2019 Purchase Order Number: 20-2-03e NewClimate Institute – Cologne Office ISBN 978-3-943704-75-4 Clever Str. 13-15 D-50668 Cologne, Germany You can find this publication as well Ph.: +49 (0) 221 99983300 as interactive maps and tables at www.climate-change-performance-index.org NewClimate Institute – Berlin Office Schönhauser Allee 10-11 A printout of this publication can be ordered at: D-10119 Berlin, Germany www.germanwatch.org/de/17281 Ph.: +49 (0) 030 208492742 CAN Climate Action Network International Rmayl, Nahr Street, Contents Jaara Building, 4th floor P.O.Box: 14-5472 Foreword 3 Beirut, Lebanon Ph.: +961 1 447192 1. About the CCPI 4 2. Recent Developments 6 3. Overall Results CCPI 2020 8 3.1 Category Results – GHG Emissions 10 3.2 Category Results – Renewable Energy 12 3.3 Category Results – Energy Use 14 3.4 Category Results – Climate Policy 16 4.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Annual Report
    CLIMATE AcTION Network-INterNatIoNal ANNUAL REPORT 2015 Cover: Photo Credit: IISD/Kiara Worth. Wael Hmaidan at COP 21. Photo Credit: CAN-International. political stage. The 100% renewable energy campaign was brought into the forefront throughout the year, especially during COP 21. The campaign also included successful coordination with our national/regional nodes and members on the ground, who engaged their governments in formulating their national climate action contributions. In continuity with our 2014 work on movement building, CAN also engaged with the faith movement. August 2015 was highlighted with the success of the Islamic Declaration in Istanbul urging governments to deliver a strong international climate agreement MESSAGE FROM that signals the end of the fossil fuel era and achieves 100% renewable energy. THE DIRECTOR The Climate NGO movement was also a major force in CIVIL SOCIETY TaKES CENTER STAGE IN 2015 2015, but what made the year even more unique, is the unprecedented coordination that took place across all The year 2015 was an important milestone for the sectors and structures: faith, labor, youth, businesses, climate movement and for CAN. Again, civil society UN agencies, academia, among others. This level of was able to prove that they are central to any progress cooperation now needs to continue more than ever on climate change on the international or national before. The climate movement needs to stay strong to level. Various reports that analyzed the 2015 climate continue the momentum and spirit generated out of successes, have recognized the enormous role civil the moments of 2015. society played. The climate change goal in the SDGs has even been directly attributed to the efforts of civil society.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Concord Climate Action and Resilience Plan 2020
    SUSTAINABLE CONCORD Revolutionary Resilient Ready CLIMATE ACTION AND RESILIENCE PLAN JUNE 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS Letter from Town Manager 4 Letter from Director of Sustainability 5 Acknowledgments 6 Introduction 8 Plan at a Glance 11 Climate Action in Concord 13 Greenhouse Gas Emissions 14 Climate Impacts 16 Developing the Plan 18 Plan Advisors 18 Plan Approach 18 Engaging Our Community 19 Plan Elements 20 Built Environment 20 Energy 22 Mobility 24 Natural Resources 26 Preparedness 28 Implementation Plan 30 Leadership on Climate Action 30 Next Steps 33 Action Implementation Blueprints 34 Endnotes 78 Appendices 79 A: GHG Inventory Report B: GHG Reduction (Wedge) Analysis C: Survey Summary Reports D: Business Resilience Workshop Summary & Best Practices Guide How to Navigate this Plan Sustainable Concord is the roadmap for how Concord will take action in the next 5 years to make progress toward our climate goals. It is a commitment to take 22 climate actions and includes detailed implementation blueprints. This makes for a dense document. This section serves to help you navigate the Plan. Plan Elements The Plan is organized into five plan elements, key areas to addressing climate change. Each plan element has a goal, priority actions, and indicators of success. BUILT ENERGY MOBILITY NATURAL PREPAREDNESS ENVIRONMENT RESOURCES PRIORITY ACTIONS / WHAT WE WILL DO BLUEPRINTS / HOW WE WILL DO IT CHAMPIONS / WHO WILL LEAD THE WORK TIMEFRAME / WHEN IT WILL BE IMPLEMENTED Priority Actions Blueprints Champions Timeframe The priority actions are The implementation The blueprints indicate The entire plan is the “what” we are going blueprints are the “how” champions for each designed to be initiated to do in Concord to take we are going to do it.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Action Strategy, 2010
    SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS CCLLIIMMAATTEE AACCTTIIOONN SSTTRRAATTEEGGYY March 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction .................................................................................................1 Overview of the Climate Action Strategy ............................................................... 1 Climate Change and SANDAG Regional Planning.................................................. 3 Overview of Climate Change ................................................................................... 5 How the Strategy is Organized................................................................................ 6 2. Climate Action Strategy Guiding Principles...............................................8 3. Framework for Climate Action ...................................................................9 International Efforts................................................................................................. 9 State Efforts .............................................................................................................. 9 Targets and Goals for Reducing Greenhouse Gases in the San Diego Region.... 11 SANDAG Energy and Climate Change Planning ................................................... 12 4. The San Diego Region’s Contribution to Climate Change.......................14 Existing Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the San Diego Region.............................. 14 Future Projections for Greenhouse Gas Emissions................................................ 16 5. The San Diego
    [Show full text]
  • European and African NGO Recommendations for an EU-Africa Summit That Puts Climate Action at the Forefront
    European and African NGO recommendations for an EU-Africa Summit that puts climate action at the forefront November 2017 Introduction The adoption of three intergovernmental agreements in 2015 - Agenda 2030 and the Addis Ababa Action Agenda and the Paris Agreement - illustrate the world’s determination to act together to address the multiple and interrelated challenges we face today. Central to the achievement of these three landmark agreements were the partnerships and solidarity forged between countries and regions, including the EU and Africa. Strengthened joint collaboration between the EU and Africa on climate change will be essential to ensure that the aspirations of international goals and objectives are realised, particularly for the people and communities who are at the forefront of the climate crisis. In light of the upcoming EU-Africa summit, European and African NGOs working on climate change, energy and sustainable development wish to express our support for enhanced cooperation between Africa and the EU on the ambitious climate action. We emphasise the urgency and seriousness of the climate change challenge, and call upon the two continents to work constructively together for the benefit of all people in particular and the planet in general. We also stress that full respect for human rights, gender equality, local context, CSO participation, transparency and accountability need to be at the heart of the EU-African cooperation for climate action and sustainable development. Ahead of the next EU-Africa summit, we wish to highlight a number of key outcomes that we regard as necessary to bolster cooperation, action and implementation so that the most vulnerable can overcome climate impacts and enjoy equal pursuit of sustainable development: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • CCPI-2019-Results-190614-WEB A3.Pdf
    Climate Change CCPI Performance Index Results 2019 Jan Burck, Ursula Hagen, Franziska Marten, Niklas Höhne, Christoph Bals CCPI • Results 2019 Germanwatch, NewClimate Institute & Climate Action Network CCPI • Results 2019 Germanwatch, NewClimate Institute & Climate Action Network Imprint Foreword Germanwatch – Bonn Office Dear Reader, Kaiserstr. 201 D­53113 Bonn, Germany Three years after the adoption of the Paris Agreement, global For the CCPI 2018, we evaluated and revised the CCPI methodo­ Ph.: +49 (0) 228 60492-0 Fax: +49 (0) 228 60492-19 climate action is not yet sufficient to limit global warming to logy to demonstrate existing measures more accurately and well below 2°C and to pursue efforts to limit warming to 1.5°C. to encourage steps towards effective climate policy. Since last Germanwatch – Berlin Office In order to achieve the Paris targets, more ambitious climate year’s edition, the CCPI is monitoring the development of all Stresemannstr. 72 action is needed. In the context of the newly released special GHG emissions of the 56 countries and the EU that are assessed D-10963 Berlin, Germany Ph.: +49 (0) 30 28 88 356-0 report Global Warming of 1.5°C by the Intergovernmental Panel in the index. The index now is even better suited to measure Fax: +49 (0) 30 28 88 356-1 on Climate Change (IPCC), it is ever more urgent to act now. how well countries are on track to meet the global goals of the By showing the substantial difference in impacts between Paris Agreement. It does this not only by comparing countries E­mail: [email protected] www.germanwatch.org warming of 1.5°C and 2°C, the IPCC report states that limiting by their development and current status in the three categories global warming to 1.5°C requires a rapid reduction in green­ “GHG Emissions”, “Renewable Energy” and “Energy Use”, but house gas emissions (GHG) in all sectors.
    [Show full text]
  • CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK EUROPE 2013 Contents
    CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK EUROPE 2013 Contents 2013: Building Momentum for a New Global Treaty .................. 2 CAN Europe: 2013 at a Glance ...................................... 3 Our International Work ............................................. 4 Bolstering the EU ETS .............................................. 6 Phasing out Coal ................................................... 8 Adaptation and Development ....................................... 9 Saving Energy in Europe ..........................................10 Climate Impacts in Europe and the IPCC ............................11 Renewables and Energy Markets ...................................12 Networking and Communications ..................................13 Other Networks ...................................................14 Transparency and Finance .........................................15 ...........................................16 CAN Europe Membership (April 2014) ..............................18 CAN Europe’s Board of Directors ...................................19 Climate Action Network Europe Annual Report 2013 CAN Europe gratefully acknowledges support from the European Commission. The contents of this publication are the sole responsi- of the European Union. Published in June 2014 by Climate Action Network Europe, Brus- sels, Belgium. Any reproduction in full or in part must mention the title and credit the above-mentioned publisher as the copy- right owner. © Text 2014 All rights reserved. Printed with soy-based ink on 100% recycled paper. Graphic design:
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Action & Adaptation Plan
    CITY OF SANTA MONICA CLIMATE ACTION & ADAPTATION PLAN A 2030 COMMUNITY PLAN TO REDUCE CARBON EMISSIONS & BECOME CLIMATE RESILIENT FINAL DRAFT ADOPTED MAY 2019 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS CITY COUNCIL DISABILITIES COMMISSION Gleam Davis , Mayor Marielle Krisel, Chair Terry O’Day, Mayor Pro Tempore Nanci Linke-Ellis, Vice Chair Ana Maria Jara Glenda Berg Kevin McKeown Dee Capelli Greg Morena June Carol Hagan, PhD Sue Himmelrich Thomas John Hill Ted Winterer Christy Hobart Pam O'Connor (1994-2018) Kathryn Kosmeya-Dodge Lauri Ringer TASK FORCE ON THE ENVIRONMENT Kelly S. Siegel Mark Gold, Chair Delbert A Whetter, JD, MBA Erik Neandross, Vice Chair Garen Baghdasarian STEERING COMMITTEE & PARTNERS Robert Lempert Breeze BikeShare Susan Mearns Chamber of Commerce David Pettit Climate Action Santa Monica ClimateResolve PLANNING COMMISSION Community Corporation of Santa Monica Mario Fonda-Bonardi, Chair County of Los Angeles Leslie Lambert, Vice Chair EcoMotion Amy Nancy Anderson Heal the Bay Nina Fresco Los Angeles Regional Collaborative for Climate Shawn Landres Action & Sustainability Richard McKinnon Mid-City Neighbors Jason Parry Northeast Neighbors North of Montana Association URBAN FOREST TASK FORCE Office of Representative Richard Bloom Grace Sadye Phillips, Chair Office of Senator Ben Allen Thomas Cleys, Vice Chair RAND Hans Baumann Southern California Association of Governments Robin Carmichael Santa Monica College Gloria Garvin Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District Armando Martinez Santa Monica Travel & Tourism Ellis Raskin Southern California Edison Southern California Gas Company COMMISSION FOR THE SENIOR Southern California Regional Energy Network SustainableWorks COMMUNITY The Energy Coalition Barry Engelman, Chair UCLA Luskin Center for Policy Innovation Kathryn G. Kietzman, Vice Chair USC Sea Grant Leigh Alan Brumberg Barbara Jane Browning Elliot Goldberg Paula Fern Lynn Strother Willa Faye Wells Credit: Justin Han ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS PRIMARY AUTHOR PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Garrett Wong, Sr.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019Mandate Letters CAN-Rac
    The Right Honourable Justin Trudeau Office of the Prime Minister of Canada 80 Wellington Street Ottawa, ON K1A 0A2 Dear Prime Minister Trudeau, Congratulations on your re-election to lead Canada’s government at this pivotal time in history. The next few years are crucial in responding to the climate emergency. This crisis requires transcending partisan lines for the benefit of all Canadians. Canada is in the midst of transformative change. Our foundational systems are being challenged to respond and adapt to the climate crisis, economic changes driven by automation and global competitiveness, and social and health issues like immigration, housing, poverty alleviation, addiction and harm-reduction. Canadians feel these pressures as daily influences in their lives, and in the most Canadian of ways, we want to help our friends, families and neighbours to prosper. This generosity of spirit must come to life with this government, through investment in cross-partisan, cross-sectoral co- operation to meet today’s complex, interlocking social, economic and environmental challenges. Together, we can build a stronger, kinder, more resilient Canada. The next decade must necessarily be one of global transformation toward governance and economic systems that actually work for people and the planet. The next term of government will define Canada’s contribution to this era. We ask you to demonstrate the Government of Canada’s commitment to navigating transformation through cooperation, transparency, accountability, and evidence-based decision making. We ask that you commit to collaboration with all Parliamentary colleagues and the public service, along with respectful and constructive engagement with Canadian civil society, business, labour, the public and private sector, charities and not-for-profits.
    [Show full text]