Discerning the Dynamics of Jeremiah 25–52 (MT)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
2 Chronicles Chapter 36
2 Chronicles Chapter 36 Verses 1-16: Ignoring God’s warnings will bring destruction (in this case, exile). Paying attention to God’s warnings will save a person from destruction. One of the responsibilities of being a Christian is warning people of God’s coming judgment and the way of deliverance provided through Jesus. Verses 1-4: The reign of Jehoahaz (ca. 609 B.C.; compare 2 Kings 23:31-23). Jeremiah continued to prophesy during this reign (Jer. 1:3). 2 Chronicles 36:1 "Then the people of the land took Jehoahaz the son of Josiah, and made him king in his father's stead in Jerusalem." “Then the people of the land took Jehoahaz the son of Josiah, and made him king in his father's stead": Though he was not the eldest son. Jehoiakim, who was afterwards placed in his place, being two years older, as appears from (2 Kings 23:31). And this is the reason, as the Jewish commentators in general agree, that he was anointed. Which they say was never done to the son of a king, unless there was a competitor. Or some objection to, or dispute about, the succession, as in the case of Solomon and others. Josiah had been a good king. The kings that followed him were evil. The decline of Judah is swift now. Jehoahaz was known as Johanan as well. The people loved Josiah, and assumed his son would be like his father. 2 Chronicles 36:2 "Jehoahaz [was] twenty and three years old when he began to reign, and he reigned three months in Jerusalem." Who seems to be the same with Shallum (Jer. -
JEREMIAH 25 Vs 1 KJV-Lite™ VERSES
JEREMIAH 25 vs 1 KJV-lite™ VERSES www.ilibros.net/KJV-lite.html 1 The word that came to Jeremiah / whenever the Lord God speaks to His prophets, He knows they are deeply committed to the truth: …man does not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceeds from the mouth of the Lord—Deuteronomy 8; when God speaks, the prophet does not say: give me a minute while I go and get a pencil; the prophet does not say: Um! Could You repeat the last part? when God speaks, the prophet knows: 1. Stop everything; 2. Ear-flaps open. The word that came… concerning all the people of Judah / the southern 2 tribes who were greatly blessed with spiritual promises involving Messiah, so affecting all eternity; whose history is very different from that of the northern 10 tribes who merely received many unconditional nationalist promises given to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, effective in time; in the fourth year of Jehoiakim the son of Josiah king of Judah, that was the first year of Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon; 2 which Jeremiah the prophet spoke to all the people of Judah, and to all the inhabitants of Jerusalem / remember, the northern 10 tribes of greater Israel — led by Ephraim who was the birthright recipient of all the nationalistic promises given to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob… 170 years earlier, they had already gone into Assyrian captivity, Jeremiah the prophet spoke… saying, 3 From the thirteenth year of Josiah the son of Amon king of Judah, even to this day, for twenty-three [23] years, the word of the LORD has come to me, and I have spoken to you again and again; but you have not listened / I’d say, the Lord was generously patient. -
Bereishit (Genesis)
Issues and Comments The Book of Bereishit (Genesis) Introduction Bereishit Noach Lech Lecha Vayeira Chayei Sarah Toldot Vayeitzei Vayishlach Vayeishev Mikeitz Vayigash Vayechi Haftarot Note: all quotations and comments refer to the interpolated translation unless otherwise indicated. All comments are by Moshe Wisnefsky unless otherwise indicated. Introduction Title: Bereishit Some people questioned the advisability of ending this word with a ‘t’ at the end, because of its negative connotation in secular society. So, we looked at a number of Kehos books (e.g., R’ Schochet’s translations of Likutei Sichot) and found that the use of “Bereishit” was not uncommon. Personally, I thought the whole question was a bit silly, reminded me of being in fourth grade. Here in Israel, sometimes when their teaching kids the 12 pesukim, they change the last word of the one that ends “batachtonim,” because in Modern Hebrew “tachtonim” [also] means “underwear.” But this is for 7-8 year-olds. Hebrew: Double parashiot However, in the Shai LaMora edition, the .שני כשהם מחוברין In most Chumashim, the formula is The Hebrew text file we used came using the second version, so that’s .שני במחוברין formula is what we stuck with. CONCEPTS: The following are some of the specific issues where science and Torah are commonly considered to contradict each other. I have not included spontaneous generation, because (1) the issue is not raised in the written Torah, and (2) it would have unnecessarily made us look totally wacko. CONCEPTS: ARCHEOLOGY: In most cases, it is the lack of archeological attestation of particular event or period that is purported to refute the Torah’s account. -
Jeremiah 51:15- 19 (Mt): an “Unintentional” Link
M.D. Terblanche Research Fellow, JEREMIAH 51:15- Department of Old and New Testament 19 (MT): AN Studies, University of the Free State, “UNINTENTIONAL” South Africa. LINK BETWEEN THE Email: mdterblanche@ ORACLES AGAINST absamail.co.za BABYLON AND THE DOI: http://dx.doi. REMAINDER OF THE org/10.18820/23099089/ 1 actat.Sup26.9 BOOK OF JEREMIAH ISSN 1015-8758 (Print) ISSN 2309-9089 (Online) Acta Theologica 2018 ABSTRACT Suppl 26:155-169 The oracles against Babylon seem to be an anomaly in © Creative Commons the Book of Jeremiah. The doxology in Jeremiah 51:15- With Attribution (CC-BY) 19 (MT) does, however, serve as a link between these oracles and the remainder of the book of Jeremiah. By giving the impression of being a deliberate quotation of 10:12-16, 51:15-19 takes the reader back to 10:1-16, a composition in which the contrast between the idols of the nations and YHWH is emphasized. YHWH has the power to execute his plan to destroy Babylon. 51:15- 19 did, however, attain a distinct identity through its close connections with the oracles against Babylon. It paradoxically functions as a link between these oracles and those against Judah. In contrast to YHWH’s actions, which resulted in the destruction of Jerusalem, his future dealings would result in the fall of Babylon and the return of his people from exile. 1. INTRODUCTION The oracles against Babylon, occurring in Jeremiah 50:1-51:58 (Masoretic Text), seem to be an anomaly in the Book of Jeremiah. When 1 This article is dedicated to prof. -
The Prophet Jeremiah As Theological Symbol in the Book of Jeremiah╊
Scholars Crossing LBTS Faculty Publications and Presentations 11-2010 The Prophet Jeremiah as Theological Symbol in the Book of Jeremiah” Gary E. Yates Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/lts_fac_pubs Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, Comparative Methodologies and Theories Commons, Ethics in Religion Commons, History of Religions of Eastern Origins Commons, History of Religions of Western Origin Commons, Other Religion Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Yates, Gary E., "The Prophet Jeremiah as Theological Symbol in the Book of Jeremiah”" (2010). LBTS Faculty Publications and Presentations. 372. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/lts_fac_pubs/372 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in LBTS Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ETS, Atlanta 2010 “The Prophet Jeremiah as Theological Symbol in the Book of Jeremiah” Gary E. Yates, Ph.D. Introduction Timothy Polk has noted, “Nothing distinguishes the book of Jeremiah from earlier works of prophecy quite so much as the attention it devotes to the person of the prophet and the prominence it accords the prophetic ‘I’, and few things receive more scholarly comment.”1 More than simply providing a biographical or psychological portrait of the prophet, the book presents Jeremiah as a theological symbol who embodies in his person the word of Yahweh and the office of prophet. 2 In fact, the figure of Jeremiah is so central that a theology of the book of Jeremiah “cannot be formulated without taking into account the person of the prophet, as the book presents him.”3 The purpose of this study is to explore how Jeremiah the person functions as a theological symbol and what these motifs contribute to the overall theology of the book of Jeremiah. -
J. Barton Payne, "The Unity of Isaiah: Evidence from Chapters 36-39," Bulletin of the Evangelical Theological Society 6.2 (May 1963): 50-56
J. Barton Payne, "The Unity of Isaiah: Evidence From Chapters 36-39," Bulletin of the Evangelical Theological Society 6.2 (May 1963): 50-56. The Unity of Isaiah: Evidence from Chapters 36-39 J. Barton Payne [p.50] The four chapters of Isaiah 36-39 that appear also in II Kings 18-20 and that contain historical dialog between the prophet and his king, Hezekiah, have produced more critical debate than any other section of I and II Kings.1 They furnish also some of our primary evidence for the unity of the Book of Isaiah,2 forming, as Delitzsch has put it, a “bridge” to the prophecies that follow.3 A thorough treatment of this evidence hence becomes impossible under present limitations. The writer would seek, however, to indicate three specific areas within this larger discussion in which sharpened awareness may contribute to a defense of the total authority of Scripture. L. CONDITIONING FACTORS IN EVANGELICALISM’S APPROACH TO ISAIAH 36-39 If we take, for example, such a question as the relation of Isaiah 36-39 to II Kings 18-20, it appears at the outset that liberal and conservative writers reach opposite conclusions because of their respective methodologies. The liberal, e.g. S.R. Driver, limits his admissable evidence to inductive comparisons of literary detail and of thematic concepts; he thus decides in favor of the priority of Kings.4 The conservative, e.g. Franz Delitzsch, while utilizing historical prose style as a confirmatory factor, concentrates on two reasons that arise (1) out of an analogy with other sections of Kings and Isaiah and (2) out of the authority of Chronicles, deductively applied to the chapters in question; he thus insists upon the originality of Isaiah.5 Bible believing scholars appear to be conditioned by five distinctive principles. -
The Desolation of Israel?
HOW LONG WAS THE DESOLATION OF ISRAEL? TWO CONTRASTING VIEWS How long was the Land of Israel Desolate under the Bayblonian conquest of Judah? There are two main views considered by Bible Students on the length of the period of the desolation of the land of Israel during the Babylonian captivity. 1) VIEW IN VOLUME 2: 70 years of complete desolation of the land – 606/7 BC – 536/7 BC. 2) VIEW MORE COMPATABLE WITH SECULAR HISTORIANS: 51 years captivity/desolation - 587 BC - 537 BC. 70 year period in which Judah and the nations surrounding it serve the king of Babylon. This throws 2nd Volume chronology off by about 19 years. WHY DOES IT MATTER WHICH VIEW IS CORRECT? Cyrus’ first year (of administration over the Jews – Ezra 1:1) was 536 BC which ended 70 years of desolation of the land. Therefore, the desolation of the land began in 607 (606.25) BC. That would have been when Nebuchadnezzar destroyed the temple and removed the remaining Jewish inhabitants from the land. Volume 2 chronology is based on 70 full years of desolation, on which basis we arrive at 606/7 BC as the start of the Times of the Gentiles prophecy (7 x 360 = 2520, when added to 606/7 BC brings you to 1914 AD). If the 70 years desolation is really only 51 years of desolation, this throws off the times of the Gentiles prophecy by 19 years. Agreeing with secular chronology, some still begin the prophecy in 606/7 BC, but with a different event, which would be the first captivity of Judah by Babylon about 19 years earlier at the time of King Jehoiachin. -
Do You Know God Exists?
GREAT EVENTS OF THE BIBLE -- THE BABYLONIAN CAPTIVITY OF JUDAH. Introduction: A. A Quick History Review: 1. About 1,095 B.C. Israel Became A Kingdom. 2. The first three kings of the United Kingdom: Saul, David, Solomon. a. During this time, enemies abounded; however Saul and David defeated most of them and brought peace to the nation. b. Solomon built the Temple and brought abundant wealth to the land. 3. The Kingdom split early in the days of Solomon’s foolish son, Rehoboam -- Jeroboam took the 10 northern tribes who became known as Israel; Rehoboam controlled the 2 southern tribes who were known as Judah. 4. Israel existed about 225 years; they went into Assyrian Captivity in 721 B.C. 5. Judah existed for another 135 years; the Temple was destroyed in 586 B.C. - - the people or Judah were taken into Babylonian Captivity. I. (Slide #2) Babylon’s Attacks Against Judah And Subsequent Captivity Of Judah. A. (Slide #3) Nebuchadnezzar’s First Attack Upon Jerusalem -- 606 B.C. 1. During the attack, the finest of the young men were taken to Babylon. 2. Daniel, along with his three friends, Shadrach, Meschach, and Abednego were taken into Captivity. a. Daniel remained in Captivity all through the 70 years! b. He was blessed by God in the Babylonian and in the Persia Empires. c. Jer. 32:31,32 “For this city has been to Me a provocation of My anger and My fury from the day that they built it, even to this day; so I will remove it from before My face 32because of all the evil of the children of Israel and the children of Judah, which they have done to provoke Me to anger--they, their kings, their princes, their priests, their prophets, the men of Judah, and the inhabitants of Jerusalem.” 1 B. -
Narrative Parallelism and the "Jehoiakim Frame": a Reading Strategy for Jeremiah 26-45
Scholars Crossing LBTS Faculty Publications and Presentations 6-2005 Narrative Parallelism and the "Jehoiakim Frame": a Reading Strategy for Jeremiah 26-45 Gary E. Yates Liberty University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/lts_fac_pubs Recommended Citation Yates, Gary E., "Narrative Parallelism and the "Jehoiakim Frame": a Reading Strategy for Jeremiah 26-45" (2005). LBTS Faculty Publications and Presentations. 5. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/lts_fac_pubs/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in LBTS Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. JETS 48/2 (June 2005) 263-81 NARRATIVE PARALLELISM AND THE "JEHOIAKIM FRAME": A READING STRATEGY FOR JEREMIAH 26-45 GARY E. YATES* I. INTRODUCTION Many attempting to make sense of prophetic literature in the Hebrew Bible would echo Carroll's assessment that "[t]o the modern reader the books of Isaiah, Jeremiah and Ezekiel are virtually incomprehensible as books."1 For Carroll, the problem with reading these books as "books" is that there is a confusing mixture of prose and poetry, a lack of coherent order and arrange ment, and a shortage of necessary contextual information needed for accu rate interpretation.2 Despite the difficult compositional and historical issues associated with the book of Jeremiah, there is a growing consensus that -
The Bible and Its Modern Methods: Interpretation Between Art and Text
Morse, Benjamin L. (2008) The Bible and its modern methods: interpretation between art and text. PhD thesis. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/498/ Copyright and moral rights for this thesis are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Glasgow Theses Service http://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] THE BIBLE AND ITS MODERN METHODS: INTERPRETATION BETWEEN ART AND TEXT Doctoral dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Arts by BENJAMIN MORSE University of Glasgow Department of Theology and Religious Studies 31 October 2008 In memory of my mother The Reverend Jane Anderson Morse (1943-1995) 2 ABSTRACT The dissertation that follows pushes the boundaries of biblical interpretation by formulating relationships between passages of the Hebrew Bible and unrelated works of Modern art. While a growing field of criticism addresses the representation of scriptural stories in painting, sculpture and film, the artwork in this study does not look to the Bible for its subject matter. The intertextual/intermedia comparisons instead address five different genres of biblical literature and read them according to various dynamics found in Modern images. In forming these relationships I challenge traditional perceptions of characters and literary style by allowing an artistic representation or pictorial method to highlight issues of selfhood, gender and power and by revaluing narrative and poetry in nuanced aesthetic terms. -
Jeremiah Introduction
Jeremiah Introduction Jeremiah, the 7th century prophet, lived during the tumultuous times that were taking place in the Middle East. The Assyrian Empire was about to crumble before the armies of the Babylonia and Chaldea. Little Judah was under the leadership of King Josiah, and hoped to survive this uncertain political and military scene. There was a renewal of faith in Judah under Josiah which caused the people to be united during his lifetime but upon his death that unity disappeared. In the light of the uncertainty of domination, Egypt sought to gain an advantage by capturing Judah and Jerusalem. However, just as this was about to take place the Egyptians were soundly defeated at the battle of Carchemish. As the Babylonian army marched against Palestine, the city of Jerusalem and the temple were plundered by Babylonian soldiers. A puppet king was established in Palestine. Babylon experienced an internal revolt, resulting in Egypt’s hope to gain control but the Babylonians were able to become firmly established. Jehoahaz (also called Shallum) ruled for three months and then was taken to Egypt by Pharaoh Neco. Jehoiakim (also called Eliakim) reigned for eleven years during which time Judah was a buffer state between the two great powers: Egypt and King Nebuchadnezzar. During this time the current Canaanite religion came into vogue and was practiced by many residents. Zedekiah then reigned for eleven yeas and was taken to Babylon by Nebuchadnezzar as a prisoner. Jehoichin (also called Jeconiah or Coniah) tried to rule, though his rule lasted only three months and he was taken to Babylon by Nebuchadnezzar at the same time that Ezekiel was taken into captivity in Babylon. -
Can You Answer These Questions?
c"qa CAN YOU ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS? 1. In what way were the Matriarchs superior to the Patriarchs? 2. How was Sarah related to Terah? 3. In what ways was Rivkah similar to Sarah? 4. Who founded the city of Hebron? 5. What do Hebron, Shechem, and Mount Moriah have in common? This and much more will be addressed in the sixth lecture of this series: "Sarah and Rivkah: The Legacy of the Matriarchs". To derive maximum benefit from this lecture, keep these questions in mind as you listen to the lecture and read through the outline. Go back to these questions once again at the end of the lecture and see how well you answer them. PLEASE NOTE: This outline and source book were designed as a powerful tool to help you appreciate and understand the basis of Jewish History. Although the lectures can be listened to without the use of the outline, we advise you to read the outline to enhance your comprehension. Use it as well as a handy reference guide and for quick review. This lecture is dedicated to the merit and honor of the Newman Family THE EPIC OF THE ETERNAL PEOPLE Presented by Rabbi Shmuel Irons Series XIII Lecture #6 SARAH AND RIVKAH: THE LEGACY OF THE MATRIARCHS I. The Unique Contribution of the Matriarchs A. cec oxd`e dyn awrie wgvie mdxa` od el`e mlerd cqizp odilry dfd mleray miwicv dray (` e dkin) xn`py mlerd miiwzn odizeyp liaya jk mlerd z` miiwzn oliayay myke dnlye erny (a my my) xn`py mlerd zea` `l` mixd oi` jlew zerabd dprnyze mixdd z` aix mew zerabd dprnyze (my) xn`py d`le lgx dwax dxy zedn` `l` zerab oi`e 'ebe 'c aix z` mixd ohy zkqn zezia `tl` yxcn 'a wlg zeyxcn iza .jlew There are seventzaddikim (saints) upon whom the world was founded: Avraham, Yitzchak, Yaakov, Moshe, Aharon, David and Shlomo.