ROYAL SOCIETY PAIRING SCHEME by Professor Ruth Aylett and Ian Murray MP

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ROYAL SOCIETY PAIRING SCHEME by Professor Ruth Aylett and Ian Murray MP ROYAL SOCIETY PAIRING SCHEME Every year the Royal Society arranges partners between parliamentarians and civil servants with scientists. Its annual Pairing Scheme starts with the ‘Week in Westminster’ in late November, a programme of activities for the scientists including seminars, workshops, shadowing opportunities and a tour of Westminster. The week gives the scientists a taste, not only of the approach to science policy, but of Parliament and the Civil Service in general. Professor Ruth Aylett Professor of Computer Science, As a researcher in artificial I was paired with Ian Murray, politician’s timescales. Ian gets Heriot-Watt University intelligence and robotics, and a the Labour MP for Edinburgh 700 emails a day, and though Professor of Computer Science South, who went into Parliament he now has a clerical assistant at Heriot-Watt University in at the last election after working helping him to deal with them, it Edinburgh, I am often frustrated in a variety of small businesses. is clear he doesn’t have very by public perceptions of my He is part of the shadow BIS much time for mastering new area. These seem often driven team, the new name for what I materials. Moreover there is zero by wildly sensationalist media remember being the DTI at one training for MPs, so picking publicity for ideas such as point, and thus the department things up as they go along ‘robots will take over the world’ responsible among other things seems very much the rule. or The Singularity, after which for research funding, higher Ian was very committed to the artificial intelligences will keep education, and technology- pairing exercise and took me humans as pets, if we are lucky. transfer programmes. everywhere he went, though understandably there were a ... Westminster makes you think of couple of private meetings I a museum ... couldn't attend. I did however witness an informal meeting This was one motivation for I met Ian on the Tuesday of with a couple of managers from applying to the Royal Society my week in Westminster outside the Post Office in the Portcullis Pairing Scheme, in which the Millbank Tower, where he House canteen. Ian is concerned scientists are linked to MPs or was deputising for a colleague at that the Royal Mail sell-off could civil servants. What if policy was a technology transfer event. This result in total destabilisation of made on the back of such was a conference run by a the Post Office, which was not inaccurate ideas? What if real North-East-based tech transfer part of that sell-off, and along issues of privacy and security company called CPI (Centre for with the managers, was already visible in the use of AI Process Innovation), who as examining new activities that technologies on the web were might help Post Offices succeed. to be ignored in favour of these their name suggests, specialise improbable fantasies? And so in in process industry technology. Prime Minister’s question time November 2014 I watched the Ian took this on at short notice was just as much a circus from Northumbrian coast go by as my ... there is zero training for MPs ... train took me to London for a week in Westminster. and as a result was presenting a the Visitor’s Gallery as it looks on If you are used to the Scottish speech written by his colleague, television. Ian felt that, oddly, all parliament in its nice new who’d been called away from the MPs know how bad this building with electronic voting London unexpectedly. looks to the general public, but it and high-tech desks for MSPs to This need to react and perform goes on anyway. He was down sit at in the debating chamber, off-the-top–of-the-head seems to ask a question in the session, Westminster makes you think of not untypical of an MP’s life, and which moved with bewildering a museum. Of course it is also a underlines how hard it is to speed, like much parliamentary workplace. mesh the academic’s and the activity. 22 Science in Parliament Vol 72 No 1 Spring 2015 The Commons Select maybe one has to follow some A fascinating week, and a lot out that their Board meeting Committee on Science was page on the Government learned. Whether I can put any early next year will indeed more tractable an event for an website to see them. of this to practical use remains consider such a POST Note as to be seen: for an individual one of various possibilities. We academic, as MPs interviewed On our final day, GO Science – had a long chat about what witnesses in some depth, in this the Government Office for scientist to have much effect on such a Note might cover, and if case on biometric technologies. I Science – presented their the political dramas of it does happen then I would be wondered how they managed mechanisms for scientific advice Westminster seems about as able to feel I had some small to ask sensible questions – in crisis situations. We worked easy as jumping through a door effect on the process. My pair remember, no training – but the through a group-based exercise in a fast moving train. Still, one Ian Murray will come and see MPs at this session seemed very around the floods of early this of the things I learned was that our Robotics Labs in February, conscientious and did a year, and with my IT hat on I as well as GO Science, and the and hopefully this will build a reasonable job. Acting as an was astonished – and not in a select committees of the two longer-term relationship: Houses, there is also a assuming that is, he is re-elected ... they had been using photocopied maps ... Parliamentary Office of Science in May. Time horizons look very and Technology – POST – that expert at a select committee is different for an MP than for a good way – that they had been serves the parliamentarians at certainly one way of bringing using photocopied maps as a scientist – and that is the large. They produce POST Notes science into the decision-making way of representing key data. challenge for more lasting on specific topics, and so I processes, though it was less But lessons can be learned just meetings of minds. emailed them suggesting one clear how one would get to be as quickly as everything else it on AI and Robotics. called as an expert. seems, since now there is a Opportunities are apparently quite reasonable GIS system for A few weeks later one of their advertised somewhere, but use in the next such crisis. team gave me a ring – it turns Professor of Computer Science shocking realities of geopolitical We both have the responsibility at Heriot Watt University in realities of the time to break the to promote dialogue, Edinburgh. I have to admit that I “unbreakable” enigma code. It is engagement and – hopefully – didn’t know much about Ruth’s said that their work contributed respect and understanding area of expertise prior to to the shortening of the war by between politicians and meeting her. The extent of my two years, possibly saving scientists. engagement with robots and millions of lives. A As an MP who represents the artificial intelligence was only on mathematician, logician, University of Edinburgh King’s the cinema screen so it was computer scientist and Royal Buildings and the Research excellent to be able to learn Society fellow whose influence Centres at Little France I take a more about her area. came to bear far beyond the close interest in the Pairing Ian Murray realm of his fellow scientists. Scheme. It is thoroughly Member of Parliament for Science usually meanders low Edinburgh South and Labour’s under the national politics radar. Just think – where would be enjoyable and increased my Shadow Minister for Trade and We must recognise that it today without ‘Turing’s Machines’ knowledge of key scientific areas Investment should be placed at the centre This is the third year I have of our debates. We need to ... Science usually meanders low under the participated in the Royal understand that the decisions national politics radar ... Society’s Pairing Scheme and, government and elected yet again, it was a hugely representatives make in the or the field of artificial in the last three years from rewarding experience. It’s a lobbies of the House of intelligence? The debt of Carbon Capture and Storage to very important scheme and Commons have a direct impact gratitude he is owed makes it all artificial intelligence. As a one that I would encourage on the development of our the more horrifying that he was Shadow Business Minister it has my colleagues to take up in science sector, and in turn the treated so inhumanely. also been very useful to see the things those scientists and contribution science makes to the future. Indeed, it’s My involvement in the scheme researchers can contribute to the the UK economy and why it incumbent on all elected over recent years has made me lives of our constituents. should be supported by representative to be better value the link between science Government. informed about science issues Nothing encaptures that more and politics. But we need to and to encourage scientists to than the story of Alan Turing and make it stronger. MPs and I hope to visit Ruth at Heriot understand how they can his team, and the pivotal part scientists have a responsibility to Watt in the near future so that I influence science policy.
Recommended publications
  • Sip SPRING 2015
    SCIENCE IN PARLIAMENT The Journal of the Parliamentary and Scientific Committee sip SPRING 2015 This is not an official publication of the House of Commons or the House of Lords. It has not been approved by either House or its Committees. All-Party Groups are informal groups of members of both Houses with a common interest in particular issues. The views expressed in this Journal are those of the Group. This Journal is funded by the members of the Parliamentary and Scientific Committee. www.scienceinparliament.org.uk A century of energy professionalism Energy makes life what it is today and for a century the Energy Institute has been the place to be for energy professionals to develop knowledge, skills and good practice. www.energyinst.org Follow us: Join us: @EnergyInstitute Energy Institute snooker players who can skim is giving in to lobbying by the black into the pocket, but vested interests and I hope the SCIENCE IN PARLIAMENT this is something else. science community protests Somebody likened it to loudly. Sadly, it remains the throwing a hammer in the air case that some politicians sip in London and hitting a nail in (including in the UK) put Beijing! personal prejudice ahead of By the time you are reading evidence based policy. this we may have started to I will finish on a positive note. The Journal of the Parliamentary and Andrew Miller MP Scientific Committee. Chairman, Parliamentary and understand what has been In 2014 we celebrated our The Committee is an Associate Scientific Committee uncovered about the history of 75th anniversary.
    [Show full text]
  • AISB 2013 2Nd-5Th April 2013 University of Exeter, Exeter
    AISB 2013 2nd-5th April 2013 University of Exeter, Exeter, England Symposium: Artificial Intelligence and Poetry http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~ruth/ai&p.html Call for papers OVERVIEW Poetry represents a valuable domain for AI, exemplifying fundamental aspects of creativity which, in the view of proponents of Lady Lovelace’s objection that computers can do nothing original, focus strongly the differences between machines and humans. Poetry also exemplifies hard problems of practical AI, in natural language generation, expressive speech and non-verbal behaviour. This one day workshop will provide strong opportunities for synergies amongst researchers and practitioners in AI, Literature, Performance Arts, Philosophy and Psychology. TOPICS WILL INCLUDE: * AI generated poetry; * AI performance of poetry; * expressive voice and body language for poetry performance; * history of mechanical/algorithmic poetry generation and performance; * socio-technical aspects of AI & poetry; * philosophical aspects of AI & poetry; * evaluating AI poetry systems. We explicitly exclude human poetry about AI. SUBMISSIONS We are seeking submissions of original: * papers; * recordings, videos and performances accompanied by written documentation; that fit well with the symposium theme and topics. Papers/documentation should be no more than 6 pages in length in the AISB convention format – see below. Electronic submissions should be made via EasyChair: https://www.easychair.org/conferences/?conf=aip13 At least one author of each accepted submission will be required to register and attend the symposium to present their work. Download PDF example Download LaTeX Download MS Word PUBLICATION All papers/documentation from the AISB convention will be published in the AISB proceedings, with an ISBN number.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Coordination: Principles, Artefacts and Theories (SOCIAL.PATH)
    Social Coordination: Principles, Artefacts and Theories (SOCIAL.PATH) Harko Verhagen, Pablo Noriega, Tina Balke and Marina de Vos (editors) AISB Convention 2013 • University of Exeter • 3rd–5th April, 2013 Foreword from the Convention Chairs This volume forms the proceedings of one of eight co-located symposia held at the AISB Convention 2013 that took place 3rd-5th April 2013 at the University of Exeter, UK. The convention consisted of these symposia together in four parallel tracks with five plenary talks; all papers other than the plenaries were given as talks within the symposia. This symposium-based format, which has been the standard for AISB conventions for many years, encourages collabora- tion and discussion among a wide variety of disciplines. Although each symposium is self contained, the convention as a whole represents a diverse array of topics from philosophy, psychology, computer science and cognitive science under the common umbrella of artificial intelligence and the simulation of behaviour. We would like to thank the symposium organisers and their programme committees for their hard work in publicising their symposium, attracting and reviewing submissions and compiling this volume. Without these interesting, high quality symposia the convention would not be possible. Dr Ed Keedwell & Prof. Richard Everson AISB 2013 Convention Chairs Published by The Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and the Simulation of Behaviour http://www.aisb.org.uk ISBN: 978-1-908187-36-9 SOCIAL.PATH 2013 Table of Contents Table of Contents Social Mind As Coordination Artifact . 1 Cristiano Castelfranchi Coordination: why is it so difficult to model?. 2 Nigel Gilbert Towards Electronic Order .
    [Show full text]
  • Sample Organization Listing by Sheridan Communications
    AAMAS 2018 Programme Committee Andrés Abeliuk (University of Southern California) Sara Bernardini (Royal Holloway University of Carole Adam (Université Grenoble Alpes) London) Diana Adamatti (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande) Jonas Beskow (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) Henny Admoni (Carnegie Mellon University) Elisabetta Bevacqua (National Engineering School of Adrian Agogino (NASA Ames Research Center) Brest (ENIB)) Aamir Ahmad (Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Floris Bex (Utrecht University) Systems) Aurelie Beynier (LIP6 / Sorbonne Université) Reza Ahmadzadeh (Georgia Institute of Technology) Satyanath Bhat (National University of Singapore) Stephane Airiau (Universite Paris-Dauphine) Peter Biro (Institute of Economics, Hungarian Magalie Ochs Aix (Marseille Université / LSIS) Academy of Sciences) Charilaos Akasiadis (Technical University of Crete) Joydeep Biswas (University of Massachusetts Amherst) Mohammad Al-Zinati (Jordan University of Science and Technology) Sebastien Blandin (IBM Research) Georgios Amanatidis (Centrum Wiskunde & Konstantinos Blekas (University of Ioannina) Informatica (CWI)) Daan Bloembergen (Centrum Wiskunde & Leila Amgoud (University of Toulouse / CNRS-IRIT) Informatica (CWI)) Ofra Amir (Technion -- Israel Institute of Technology) Liad Blumrosen (The Hebrew University) Bo An (Nanyang Technological University) Anton Bogdanovych (Western Sydney University) Monica Anderson (University of Alabama) Thomas Bolander (Technical University of Denemark) Luis Antunes (Universidade de Lisboa) Ladislau Bölöni
    [Show full text]
  • Dr Miguel Angel Beltrán
    Open Letter to President Juan Manuel Santos Dear Mr. President, We, the undersigned, are writing to demand the immediate release from prison of Colombian academic Dr Miguel Angel Beltran. Dr Beltran has been imprisoned since May 2009 without being convicted of any crime whatsoever. He has been accused of 'rebellion' and branded a terrorist by the Colombian State, yet no evidence has been provided to back up the allegations. We are deeply concerned that Dr Beltran, like so many others in Colombia, has been jailed for his political beliefs rather than for any crime; that he is being deprived of his liberty in order to silence him and discourage others like him from speaking out. We believe that academic freedom and freedom of expression are fundamental rights, and a pillar of democratic society, but Dr Beltran’s ongoing detention shows that Colombia currently respects neither. We therefore urge you to order his immediate release. The large number of political prisoners in Colombia's jails – be they academics, trade unionists, community leaders or other civil society activists – belies claims that human rights are being respected by the Colombian State. We urge you to put an end to this shameful situation without delay. Yours sincerely, Professor Sir Richard Roberts, Nobel Prize Winner Professor Sir John Ball, Sedleian Professor of Natural Philosophy, University of Oxford Professor Dame Janet Nelson, Emeritus Professor of History, King's College London Alan Whitaker, President, University and College Union Terry Hoad, Vice President, University
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridge, UK the 15Th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference 2 on Human Robot Interaction (HRI2020) HRI’20 Chairs’ Welcome……4
    Cambridge, UK The 15th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference 2 on Human Robot Interaction (HRI2020) HRI’20 Chairs’ Welcome……4 Map……8 – Conference Venue_Workshop……8 Main Conference……10 Schedule Overview……12 Day 1……18 – Workshops……19 Day 2……36 – Keynote #1……41 – Regular Session(1~5)……44 – LBR #1……71 – SDC #1……82 – Demo #1……84 – Pioneers Workshop #1……86 Day 3……88 – Keynote #2……93 – Regular Session(1~5)……96 – LBR #2……124 – SDC #2……134 – Demo #2……136 – Pioneers Workshop #2……138 – Video Session……141 Day 4……144 – Keynote #3……152 – Regular Session(1~5)……155 – Industry Talks Session……181 – alt.HRI Session……182 – Pioneers Workshop #3……187 Exhibiton……189 Sponsors & Supporters……192 Committees……208 Reviewers……212 3 HRI’20 Chairs’ Welcome 4 It is our pleasure to welcome you to the 15th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction – HRI 2020. HRI is a premier, highly-selective meeting presenting the latest advances in the field, with broad participation from a range of scholars, including roboticists, social scientists, designers, engineers, and many others. HRI presents the latest advancements in technical, design, behavioural, theoretical, methodological, and metrological ideas in HRI. The theme of this year’s conference is “Real World Human-Robot Interaction,” reflecting on recent trends in our community toward creating and deploying systems that can facilitate real-world, long-term interaction. This theme also reflects a new theme area we have introduced at HRI this year, “Reproducibility for Human Robot Interaction,” which is key to realizing this vision and helping further our scientific endeavors. This trend was also reflected across our other four theme areas, including “Human-Robot Interaction User Studies,” “Technical Advances in Human-Robot Interaction,” “Human-Robot Interaction Design,” and “Theory and Methods in Human- Robot Interaction.” The conference attracted 279 full paper submissions from around the world, including Asia, Australia, the Middle East, North America, South America, and Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • AISB 2004 Convention: Motion, Emotion and Cognition
    AISB 2004 Convention: Motion, Emotion and Cognition Proceedings of the AISB 2004 Symposiium on Language, Speech and Gesture for Expressive Characters 29 March – 1 April, 2004 ICSRiM, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK www.leeds.ac.uk/aisb www.icsrim.org.uk AISB 2004 Convention 29 March – 1 April, 2004 ICSRiM, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK www.leeds.ac.uk/aisb www.icsrim.org.uk Proceedings of the AISB 2004 Symposium on Language, Speech & Gesture for Expressive Characters Published by The Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and the Simulation of Behaviour http://www.aisb.org.uk ISBN 1 902956 39 0 Contents The AISB 2004 Convention ……………………………………………………………………. ii K. Ng Symposium Preface ……………………………………………………………………………. iii R. Aylett, M. Cavazza, P. Olivier Expressive speech characteristics in the communication with artificial agents ……..………… 1 Kirsten Fischer A probabilistic hierarchical framework for active appearance model ..…….………………… 12 Lukasz Zalewski & Shaogang Gong Modelling character emotion in an interactive virtual environment ..………………………… 20 El Jed Mehdi, Pallamin Nico, Dugdale Julie and Pavard Bernard Artistically based computer generation of expressive motion .……..………………………… 29 Michael Neff & Eugene Fiume Speaking and acting - interacting language and action for an expressive character ………… 40 Sandy Louchart, Daniela Romano, Ruth Aylett & Jonathan Pickering Expressive characters and a text chat interface …………………....………………………… 48 Marco Gillies, Barry Crabtree & Daniel Ballin Speaking with emotions .……………………………………………………………………
    [Show full text]
  • “Fearnot!”: a Computer-Based Anti-Bullying-Programme Designed
    Eur J Psychol Educ (2011) 26:21–44 DOI 10.1007/s10212-010-0035-4 “FearNot!”:acomputer-basedanti-bullying-programme designed to foster peer intervention Natalie Vannini & Sibylle Enz & Maria Sapouna & Dieter Wolke & Scott Watson & Sarah Woods & Kerstin Dautenhahn & Lynne Hall & Ana Paiva & Elizabeth André & Ruth Aylett & Wolfgang Schneider Received: 5 June 2009 /Revised: 8 January 2010 /Published online: 19 June 2010 # Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada, Lisboa, Portugal and Springer Science+Business Media BV 2010 Abstract Bullying is widespread in European schools, despite multiple intervention strategies having been proposed over the years. The present study investigates the effects of a novel virtual learning strategy (“FearNot!”) to tackle bullying in both UK and German samples. The approach is intended primarily for victims to increase their coping skills and further to heighten empathy and defence of victims by non-involved bystanders. This paper focuses on the defender role. Applying quantitative as well as qualitative methodology, the present study found that “FearNot!” helped non-involved children to become defenders in the German sub-sample while it had no such effect in the UK sub-sample. German “New Defenders” (children who are initially uninvolved N. Vannini (*) : W. Schneider Institute of Psychology, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany e-mail: [email protected] W. Schneider e-mail: [email protected] S. Enz Gruppe fuer Interdisziplinaere Psychologie, Universitaet Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany e-mail: [email protected] M. Sapouna : D. Wolke Department of Psychology, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK M. Sapouna e-mail: [email protected] D.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of AISB'06: Adaptation in Artificial and Biological Systems
    Proceedings of AISB’06: Adaptation in Artificial and Biological Systems Tim Kovacs and James A. R. Marshall (eds.) ISBN 1 902956 97 5 – Volume 1 ISBN 1 902956 98 3 – Volume 2 ISBN 1 902956 96 7 – Volume 3 Published by the Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and the Simulation of Behaviour Printed by the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK Contents Foreword I-iii Tim Kovacs and James A. R. Marshall Plenary Talks Evolutionary Design of Complex Chemical Systems – 3rd April I-v Mark A. Bedau Life and Mind: A Union without Divorce? – 4th April I-vi Maggie Boden From Individual to Collective Intelligence – 5th April I-vii Nigel R. Franks Artificial Consciousness and the Simulation of Behaviour – 6th April I-viii Owen Holland Symposia Artificial Immune Systems and Immune System Modelling I-1 Associative Learning and Reinforcement Learning I-22 Integrative Approaches to Machine Consciousness I-107 Motor Development I-174 Biologically Inspired Robotics (Biro-net) II-68 Grand Challenge 5: Architecture of Brain and Mind II-1 Nature-Inspired Systems for Parallel, Asynchronous and Decentralised Environments II-145 Exploration vs. Exploitation in Naturally Inspired Search II-178 Narrative AI and Games III-1 Network Analysis in Natural Sciences and Engineering III-86 Social Insect Behaviour: Theory and Applications III-199 Author Index I-203, II-210, III-210 GC5: Architecture of Brain and Mind Integrating High Level Cognitive Processes with Brain Mechanisms and Functions in a Working Robot 3rd - 4th April 2006 Organisers Aaron Sloman, University of Birmingham Invited Speakers Jackie Chappell, Univ. of Birmingham Peter Redgrave, Sheffield University Mike Denham, Plymouth University Murray Shanahan, Imperial College Steve Furber, Manchester University London Jeffrey Krichmar, The Neurosciences Aaron Sloman, University of Birmingham Institute Mark Steedman, University of Edinburgh Mark Lee, Univ.
    [Show full text]
  • 32Nd Annual Convention of the Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and the Simulation of Behaviour (AISB 2006)
    32nd Annual Convention of the Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and the Simulation of Behaviour (AISB 2006) Adaptation in Artificial and Biological Systems Bristol, United Kingdom 3 – 6 April 2006 Volume 1 of 3 Editors: Tim Kovacs James A. R. Marshall ISBN: 978-1-63266-835-6 Printed from e-media with permission by: Curran Associates, Inc. 57 Morehouse Lane Red Hook, NY 12571 Some format issues inherent in the e-media version may also appear in this print version. Copyright© (2006) by AISB – The Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and the Simulation of Behaviour All rights reserved. Printed by Curran Associates, Inc. (2014) For permission requests, please contact AISB at the address below. AISB c/o Dr. Katerina Koutsantoni 4 Windsor Walk, Denmark Hill London SE5 8AF UK Phone: 441 273 678 448 Fax: 441 273 671 320 [email protected] Additional copies of this publication are available from: Curran Associates, Inc. 57 Morehouse Lane Red Hook, NY 12571 USA Phone: 845-758-0400 Fax: 845-758-2634 Email: [email protected] Web: www.proceedings.com Artificial Immune Systems and Immune System Modelling 4th April 2006 Organisers James Marshall, University of Bristol Steve Cayzer, HP Labs Tim Kovacs, University of Bristol Jim Smith, Univ. of the West of England Programme Committee Uwe Aickelin, University of Nottingham Tim Kovacs, University of Bristol Mick Bailey, University of Bristol James Marshall, University of Bristol Peter Bentley, University College London Lindsay Nicholson, University of Bristol Steve Cayzer, HP Labs Martin Robbins, University of Wales Ed Clarke, University of York Jim Smith, Univ.
    [Show full text]
  • Narrative Learning Environments (NLE)
    12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education Proceedings of Workshop W7: Organising Committee Isabel Machado Alexandre (chair), INESC-ID and ISCTE, Portugal Ana Paiva, INESC-ID and Instituto Superior Técnico, Portugal Paul Brna, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom Ruth Aylett, Heriot-Watt University, United Kingdom Giuliana Dettori, ITD, Italy Program Committee Ruth Aylett, Heriot-Watt University, UK Paul Brna, University of Glasgow, UK Justine Cassell, Northwestern University, USA Kerstin Dautenhahn, University of Hertfordshire, UK Giuliana Dettori, ITD, Italy W. Lewis Johnson, University of Southern California, USA Rosemary Luckin, University of Sussex, UK Isabel Machado Alexandre (chair), INESC-ID and ISCTE, Portugal Rosella Magli, Italy Stacy Marsella, USC Information Sciences Institute, USA Claire O'Malley, University of Nottingham, UK Ana Paiva, INESC-ID and Instituto Superior Técnico, Portugal Antonio Rizzo, University of Sienna, Italy Judy Robertson, University of Glasgow, UK Karl Steffens, University of Cologne, Germany Nicolas Szilas, Macquarie University, Australia Bregje de Vries, University of Twente, the Netherlands Michael Young, North Carolina State University ,USA July, 2005 Amsterdam, The Netherlands 2 Preface Narrative has been an important form to transmit knowledge across generations, and is innate to the human nature. Narrative is also a valuable vehicle to structure knowledge and to help us in the process of meaning making. Due to the explorative and complex nature of narrative, an intelligent learning environment (ILE) based on a narrative approach can promote several kinds of activities for learners: co-construction: participate in the construction of a narrative; ∑ exploration: engage in active exploration of the learning tasks, following a narrative approach and trying to understand and reason about an environment and its elements; ∑ reflection: engage in consequent analysis of what happened within the learning session.
    [Show full text]