DOCSLIB.ORG

Diapositiva 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Diapositiva 1 Análisis Estadístico Municipio de Huatabampo Enero - Junio 2020 Participación porcentual por municipio en la incidencia delictiva SONORA Enero - Junio 2020 EMPALME RESTO DE LOS 1.41% MUNICIPIOS 6.47% HUATABAMPO MUNICIPIO TOTAL 1.55% HERMOSILLO 5,127 ETCHOJOA CAJEME 3,047 1.63% NOGALES 844 CABORCA 548 PUERTO PEÑASCO 1.66% SAN LUIS RÍO COLORADO 538 BENITO JUÁREZ 513 AGUA PRIETA HERMOSILLO NAVOJOA 465 2.87% 37.57% GUAYMAS 436 GUAYMAS AGUA PRIETA 391 3.20% PUERTO PEÑASCO 226 NAVOJOA ETCHOJOA 223 3.41% HUATABAMPO 212 BENITO JUÁREZ EMPALME 192 3.76% RESTO DE LOS MUNICIPIOS 883 SAN LUIS RÍO TOTAL GENERAL 13,645 COLORADO 3.94% En 13 municipios se concentran el CABORCA 93.5 % de la incidencia delictiva en 4.02% el Estado. NOGALES 6.19% CAJEME 22.33% Fuente: Secretariado Ejecutivo del Sistema Nacional de Seguridad Pública. Participación municipal de la incidencia delictiva Homicidio Doloso Enero - Junio 2020 MUNICIPIO LUGAR INCIDENCIA Cajeme 1 204 Hermosillo 2 109 Guaymas 3 84 Nogales 4 50 Empalme 5 49 Caborca 6 38 San Luis Río Colorado 7 37 Navojoa 8 8 Magdalena 9 7 General Plutarco Elías Calles 10 6 Benjamín Hill 11 5 Puerto Peñasco 11 5 Santa Ana 12 3 Carbó 13 2 Etchojoa 13 2 Huatabampo 13 2 San Ignacio Río Muerto 13 2 San Miguel de Horcasitas 13 2 Agua Prieta 14 1 Bácum 14 1 Benito Juárez 14 1 Moctezuma 14 1 Pitiquito 14 1 Quiriego 14 1 Rosario 14 1 Tubutama 14 1 Yécora 14 1 0 50 100 150 200 250 Fuente: Secretariado Ejecutivo del Sistema Nacional de Seguridad Pública. Participación municipal de la tasa por cada 10 mil habitantes Homicidio Doloso Enero - Junio 2020 MUNICIPIO INCIDENCIA LUGAR TASA X 10 MIL HAB. EMPALME 49 1 8.08 GUAYMAS 84 2 4.91 CAJEME 204 3 4.35 CABORCA 38 4 4.12 GENERAL PLUTARCO ELÍAS CALLES 6 5 3.25 MAGDALENA 7 6 2.07 SAN MIGUEL DE HORCASITAS 2 7 1.99 NOGALES 50 8 1.97 SAN LUIS RÍO COLORADO 37 9 1.79 SANTA ANA 3 10 1.68 SAN IGNACIO RÍO MUERTO 2 11 1.28 HERMOSILLO 109 12 1.15 PITIQUITO 1 13 0.98 PUERTO PEÑASCO 5 14 0.69 NAVOJOA 8 15 0.45 BENITO JUÁREZ 1 16 0.42 HOMICIDIO DOLOSO BÁCUM 1 17 0.40 HUATABAMPO ETCHOJOA 2 18 0.30 ENE-JUN ENE-JUN ENE-JUN DESCRIPCIÓN HUATABAMPO 2 19 0.23 2018 2019 2020 AGUA PRIETA 1 20 0.11 INCIDENCIA 0 1 2 ALTAR 0 21 0.00 TASA 0.00 0.12 0.23 IMURIS 0 21 0.00 NACOZARI DE GARCÍA 0 21 0.00 LUGAR - 23 19 ALAMOS 0 21 0.00 CANANEA 0 21 0.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 Fuente: Secretariado Ejecutivo del Sistema Nacional de Seguridad Pública. NOTA: Para obtener la tasa por cada 10 mil habitante, se utilizó la proyección de la población total de los municipios a mitad de los años 2018, 2019 y 2020 según CONAPO. No se incluyeron los municipios con población menor a los 10 mil habitantes. Tendencia del delito de Homicidio Doloso Huatabampo 2.5 2 2 1.5 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ENE FEB MAR ABR MAY JUN JUL AGO SEP OCT NOV DIC ENE FEB MAR ABR MAY JUN JUL AGO SEP OCT NOV DIC ENE FEB MAR ABR MAY JUN 2018 2019 2020 Fuente: Secretariado Ejecutivo del Sistema Nacional de Seguridad Pública. Participación municipal de la incidencia delictiva Robo de vehículo Enero - Junio 2020 MUNICIPIO LUGAR INCIDENCIA Cajeme 1 418 Hermosillo 2 399 Nogales 3 164 Guaymas 4 62 San Luis Río Colorado 5 58 Benito Juárez 6 40 Navojoa 7 37 Caborca 8 36 Magdalena 9 33 Puerto Peñasco 10 22 Empalme 11 19 Huatabampo 12 17 Bácum 13 13 Agua Prieta 14 11 General Plutarco Elías Calles 14 11 Cananea 15 6 Etchojoa 15 6 Imuris 15 6 Yécora 16 4 San Ignacio Río Muerto 17 3 Ures 17 3 Alamos 18 2 Cucurpe 18 2 Nacozari de García 18 2 Pitiquito 18 2 Sahuaripa 18 2 Santa Ana 18 2 Soyopa 18 2 Altar 19 1 Onavas 19 1 Santa Cruz 19 1 Tubutama 19 1 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 Fuente: Secretariado Ejecutivo del Sistema Nacional de Seguridad Pública. Participación municipal de la tasa por cada 10 mil habitantes Robo de vehículo Enero - Junio 2020 MUNICIPIO INCIDENCIA LUGAR TASA X 10 MIL HAB. BENITO JUÁREZ 40 1 16.78 MAGDALENA 33 2 9.74 CAJEME 418 3 8.91 NOGALES 164 4 6.47 GENERAL PLUTARCO ELÍAS CALLES 11 5 5.95 BÁCUM 13 6 5.22 IMURIS 6 7 4.33 HERMOSILLO 399 8 4.22 CABORCA 36 9 3.91 GUAYMAS 62 10 3.62 EMPALME 19 11 3.13 PUERTO PEÑASCO 22 12 3.04 SAN LUIS RÍO COLORADO 58 13 2.80 NAVOJOA 37 14 2.09 PITIQUITO 2 15 1.97 HUATABAMPO 17 16 1.96 ROBO DE VEHÍCULO SAN IGNACIO RÍO MUERTO 3 17 1.91 HUATABAMPO CANANEA 6 18 1.57 ENE-JUN ENE-JUN ENE-JUN NACOZARI DE GARCÍA 2 19 1.41 DESCRIPCIÓN 2018 2019 2020 AGUA PRIETA 11 20 1.24 SANTA ANA 2 21 1.12 INCIDENCIA 16 33 17 ALTAR 1 22 0.97 TASA 1.87 3.83 1.96 ETCHOJOA 6 23 0.90 ALAMOS 2 24 0.72 LUGAR 13 9 16 SAN MIGUEL DE HORCASITAS 0 25 0.00 0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 18.00 Fuente: Secretariado Ejecutivo del Sistema Nacional de Seguridad Pública. NOTA: Para obtener la tasa por cada 10 mil habitante, se utilizó la proyección de la población total de los municipios a mitad de los años 2018, 2019 y 2020 según CONAPO. No se incluyeron los municipios con población menor a los 10 mil habitantes. Tendencia del delito de Robo de vehículo Huatabampo 9 8 8 7 7 6 6 6 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 ENE FEB MAR ABR MAY JUN JUL AGO SEP OCT NOV DIC ENE FEB MAR ABR MAY JUN JUL AGO SEP OCT NOV DIC ENE FEB MAR ABR MAY JUN 2018 2019 2020 Fuente: Secretariado Ejecutivo del Sistema Nacional de Seguridad Pública. Incidentes (Reportes llamadas 911) de Robo de vehículo Huatabampo Septiembre 2015 – Junio 2020 7 6 6 5 5 4 4 Media 1.4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Total 81 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total 27 Total 26 Total 16 Total 5 FUENTE: Llamadas 911. Participación municipal de la incidencia delictiva Robo a casa habitación Enero - Junio 2020 MUNICIPIO LUGAR INCIDENCIA Hermosillo 1 232 Cajeme 2 115 Benito Juárez 3 114 Agua Prieta 4 58 Etchojoa 5 14 Cananea 6 13 Nogales 7 11 Caborca 8 10 Guaymas 9 9 Navojoa 9 9 Huatabampo 10 8 Magdalena 11 7 Puerto Peñasco 12 5 San Luis Río Colorado 13 4 Santa Ana 14 3 Alamos 15 1 Bacadéhuachi 15 1 Bácum 15 1 Benjamín Hill 15 1 Cumpas 15 1 Empalme 15 1 Fronteras 15 1 General Plutarco Elías Calles 15 1 Naco 15 1 Nacozari de García 15 1 Pitiquito 15 1 0 50 100 150 200 250 Fuente: Secretariado Ejecutivo del Sistema Nacional de Seguridad Pública. Participación municipal de la tasa por cada 10 mil habitantes Robo a casa habitación Enero - Junio 2020 MUNICIPIO INCIDENCIA LUGAR TASA X 10 MIL HAB. BENITO JUÁREZ 114 1 47.81 AGUA PRIETA 58 2 6.55 CANANEA 13 3 3.41 CAJEME 115 4 2.45 HERMOSILLO 232 4 2.45 ETCHOJOA 14 5 2.10 MAGDALENA 7 6 2.07 SANTA ANA 3 7 1.68 CABORCA 10 8 1.08 PITIQUITO 1 9 0.98 HUATABAMPO 8 10 0.92 NACOZARI DE GARCÍA 1 11 0.70 PUERTO PEÑASCO 5 12 0.69 GENERAL PLUTARCO ELÍAS CALLES 1 13 0.54 GUAYMAS 9 14 0.53 NAVOJOA 9 15 0.51 ROBO A CASA HABITACIÓN NOGALES 11 16 0.43 HUATABAMPO BÁCUM 1 17 0.40 ENE-JUN ENE-JUN ENE-JUN ALAMOS 1 18 DESCRIPCIÓN 0.36 2018 2019 2020 SAN LUIS RÍO COLORADO 4 19 0.19 EMPALME 1 20 0.16 INCIDENCIA 25 15 8 SAN MIGUEL DE HORCASITAS 0 21 0.00 TASA 2.92 1.74 0.92 ALTAR 0 21 0.00 IMURIS 0 21 0.00 LUGAR 2 3 10 SAN IGNACIO RÍO MUERTO 0 21 0.00 0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00 Fuente: Secretariado Ejecutivo del Sistema Nacional de Seguridad Pública. NOTA: Para obtener la tasa por cada 10 mil habitante, se utilizó la proyección de la población total de los municipios a mitad de los años 2018, 2019 y 2020 según CONAPO.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MUNICIPIO LOCALIDAD NOMBRE DE LA UNIDAD CLAVE LADA TEL Domiciliocompleto
    NOMBRE DE LA CLAVE MUNICIPIO LOCALIDAD TEL DomicilioCompleto UNIDAD LADA CENTRO DE SALUD RURAL 001 - ACONCHI 0001 - ACONCHI ACONCHI 623 2330060 INDEPENDENCIA NO. EXT. 20 NO. INT. , , COL. C.P. (84920) CASA DE SALUD LA FRENTE A LA PLAZA DEL PUEBLO NO. EXT. S/N NO. INT. , , COL. C.P. 001 - ACONCHI 0003 - LA ESTANCIA ESTANCIA 623 2330401 (84929) UNIDAD DE DESINTOXICACION AGUA 002 - AGUA PRIETA 0001 - AGUA PRIETA PRIETA 633 3382875 7 ENTRE AVENIDA 4 Y 5 NO. EXT. 452 NO. INT. , , COL. C.P. (84200) 0013 - COLONIA CENTRO DE SALUD RURAL 002 - AGUA PRIETA MORELOS COLONIA MORELOS 633 3369056 DOMICILIO CONOCIDO NO. EXT. NO. INT. , , COL. C.P. (84200) CASA DE SALUD 002 - AGUA PRIETA 0009 - CABULLONA CABULLONA 999 9999999 UNICA CALLE PRINCIPAL NO. EXT. S/N NO. INT. , , COL. C.P. (84305) CASA DE SALUD EL 002 - AGUA PRIETA 0046 - EL RUSBAYO RUSBAYO 999 9999999 UNICA CALLE PRINCIPAL NO. EXT. S/N NO. INT. , , COL. C.P. (84306) CENTRO ANTIRRÁBICO VETERINARIO AGUA 002 - AGUA PRIETA 0001 - AGUA PRIETA PRIETA SONORA 999 9999999 5 Y AVENIDA 17 NO. EXT. NO. INT. , , COL. C.P. (84200) HOSPITAL GENERAL, CARRETERA VIEJA A CANANEA KM. 7 NO. EXT. S/N NO. INT. , , COL. 002 - AGUA PRIETA 0001 - AGUA PRIETA AGUA PRIETA 633 1222152 C.P. (84250) UNEME CAPA CENTRO NUEVA VIDA AGUA CALLE 42 NO. EXT. S/N NO. INT. , AVENIDA 8 Y 9, COL. LOS OLIVOS C.P. 002 - AGUA PRIETA 0001 - AGUA PRIETA PRIETA 633 1216265 (84200) UNEME-ENFERMEDADES 38 ENTRE AVENIDA 8 Y AVENIDA 9 NO. EXT. SIN NÚMERO NO.
    [Show full text]
  • Ley De Gobierno Y Administración Municipal, Misma Que Abroga La Ley Orgánica De Administración Municipal
    COMISIONES UNIDAS DE GOBERNACION Y PUNTOS CONSTITUCIONALES. DIPUTADOS INTEGRANTES: JESUS AVILA GODOY ALFREDO LOPEZ ACEVES HOMERO RIOS MURRIETA GUSTAVO DE UNANUE AGUIRRE JOSE IRENE ALVAREZ RAMOS MARIO BARCELO ABRIL JESUS ENRIQUEZ BURGOS HELEODORO PACHECO VAZQUEZ JOSE RENE NORIEGA GOMEZ HONORABLE ASAMBLEA: Los suscritos Diputados integrantes de la Primera, Segunda y Tercera Comisión de Gobernación y Puntos Constitucionales de esta Quincuagésima Sexta Legislatura, en cumplimiento al Acuerdo emitido por el Pleno Legislativo el 30 de noviembre del 2000, mediante el cual se instruyó a estas Comisiones Unidas a efecto de dirigir, conducir y llevar a cabo los estudios, análisis y proyectos de Dictamen que resulten necesarios para cumplir con lo ordenado en los artículos transitorios del Decreto que reforma el artículo 115 de la Constitución Política de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos, publicado en el Diario Oficial de la Federación el 23 de diciembre de 1999, y en cumplimiento legal y observancia a nuestro orden jurídico constitucional y pacto federal vigente, comparecemos ante esta Representación Popular a efecto de presentar para su estudio, discusión y aprobación, en su caso, INICIATIVA DE LEY DE GOBIERNO Y ADMINISTRACION MUNICIPAL, QUE ABROGA LA LEY ORGANICA DE LA ADMINISTRACION MUNICIPAL Y LA LEY QUE REGULA LA PRESTACION DE SERVICIOS PUBLICOS MUNICIPALES, con el propósito de adecuar el orden legal del Estado a los lineamientos, principios y disposiciones establecidas por el Constituyente Permanente Federal en el proceso legislativo de reformas
    [Show full text]
  • A Distributional Survey of the Birds of Sonora, Mexico
    52 A. J. van Rossem Occ. Papers Order FALCONIFORMES Birds of PreY Family Cathartidae American Vultures Coragyps atratus (Bechstein) Black Vulture Vultur atratus Bechstein, in Latham, Allgem. Ueb., Vögel, 1, 1793, Anh., 655 (Florida). Coragyps atratus atratus van Rossem, 1931c, 242 (Guaymas; Saric; Pesqueira: Obregon; Tesia); 1934d, 428 (Oposura). — Bent, 1937, 43, in text (Guaymas: Tonichi). — Abbott, 1941, 417 (Guaymas). — Huey, 1942, 363 (boundary at Quito­ vaquita) . Cathartista atrata Belding, 1883, 344 (Guaymas). — Salvin and Godman, 1901. 133 (Guaymas). Common, locally abundant, resident of Lower Sonoran and Tropical zones almost throughout the State, except that there are no records as yet from the deserts west of longitude 113°, nor from any of the islands. Concentration is most likely to occur in the vicinity of towns and ranches. A rather rapid extension of range to the northward seems to have taken place within a relatively few years for the species was not noted by earlier observers anywhere north of the limits of the Tropical zone (Guaymas and Oposura). It is now common nearly everywhere, a few modern records being Nogales and Rancho La Arizona southward to Agiabampo, with distribution almost continuous and with numbers rapidly increasing southerly, May and June, 1937 (van Rossem notes); Pilares, in the north­ east, June 23, 1935 (Univ. Mich.); Altar, in the northwest, February 2, 1932 (Phillips notes); Magdalena, May, 1925 (Dawson notes; [not noted in that locality by Evermann and Jenkins in July, 1887]). The highest altitudes where observed to date are Rancho La Arizona, 3200 feet; Nogales, 3850 feet; Rancho Santa Bárbara, 5000 feet, the last at the lower fringe of the Transition zone.
    [Show full text]
  • Whpr19741021-005
    Digitized- from Box 4 of the White House Press Releases at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library -/ . HISTORICAL NOTE ON :ME.ETING PLACES u.S. - MEXICAN PRESIDENTIAL MEETING October 21, 1974 In 1853 the Gadsden Treaty fixed the boundary between Sonora and Arizona at e 3l 20' North Latitude and, from the I 11th meridian in a straight but diagonal line to a point on the Colorado River twenty miles below its junction with the Gila. On that boundary lie the twin cities of Nogales, Sonora, and Nogales ·Arizona -- cities which act for all the world as though there were no boundary and, as.b2! Ambos Nogales, carryon their civic work as a single entity. Truly, the Gadsden boundary is artificial and the people of Nogales are his­ torically right in disregarding it. For the international boundary neatly,. bisects what was once a completely homogenous ethnic area called Pimeria Alta, or the land of the upper Pima Indians, who lived along the north-flowing San Pedro and Santa Cruz Rivers from a point considerably South of Magdalena de Kino in Sonora almost as far North as the Gila and whose lands extended East and West from the San Pedro to the Gulf. On March 13, 1687, an Italian Jesuit, Eusebio F]."ancisco Kino, first reached Pimena Alta, and he stayed until his death in Magdalena, now Magdalena de Kino, almost precisely 24 years later. In that short space of time, Father Kino brought to Pimer1a Alta not only Christianity but European civilization and economic self-sufficiencyo He explored North to the Gila, West to the Colorado and the Gulf, proving, incidentally, that California is not an island; he intro­ duced cattle raising and agriculture 'throughout the area: and he built great churches on both sides of the border, at towns unheard of in New E~landp New Spain, or Europe -- Caborca, Tubutama, C6sari, Buquivaba, Imuris, Coc6spera, to name a few South of the border, and at Guevavi, Tumacacori anI Bac in what is now Arizona.
    [Show full text]
  • Spain's Arizona Patriots in Its 1779-1783 War
    W SPAINS A RIZ ONA PA TRIOTS J • in its 1779-1783 WARwith ENGLAND During the AMERICAN Revolutuion ThirdStudy of t he SPANISH B ORDERLA NDS 6y Granvil~ W. andN. C. Hough ~~~i~!~~¸~i ~i~,~'~,~'~~'~-~,:~- ~.'~, ~ ~~.i~ !~ :,~.x~: ~S..~I~. :~ ~-~;'~,-~. ~,,~ ~!.~,~~~-~'~'~ ~'~: . Illl ........ " ..... !'~ ~,~'] ." ' . ,~i' v- ,.:~, : ,r~,~ !,1.. i ~1' • ." ~' ' i;? ~ .~;",:I ..... :"" ii; '~.~;.',',~" ,.', i': • V,' ~ .',(;.,,,I ! © Copyright 1999 ,,'~ ;~: ~.~:! [t~::"~ "~, I i by i~',~"::,~I~,!t'.':'~t Granville W. and N.C. Hough 3438 Bahia blanca West, Aprt B Laguna Hills, CA 92653-2830 k ,/ Published by: SHHAR PRESS Society of Hispanic Historical and Ancestral Research P.O. Box 490 Midway City, CA 92655-0490 http://mcmbers.aol.com/shhar SHHARPres~aol.com (714) $94-8161 ~I,'.~: Online newsletter: http://www.somosprimos.com ~" I -'[!, ::' I ~ """ ~';I,I~Y, .4 ~ "~, . "~ ! ;..~. '~/,,~e~:.~.=~ ........ =,, ;,~ ~c,z;YA':~-~A:~.-"':-'~'.-~,,-~ -~- ...... .:~ .:-,. ~. ,. .... ~ .................. PREFACE In 1996, the authors became aware that neither the NSDAR (National Society for the Daughters of the American Revolution) nor the NSSAR (National Society for the Sons of the American Revolution) would accept descendants of Spanish citizens of California who had donated funds to defray expenses ,-4 the 1779-1783 war with England. As the patriots being turned down as suitable ancestors were also soldiers,the obvious question became: "Why base your membership application on a money contribution when the ancestor soldier had put his life at stake?" This led to a study of how the Spanish Army and Navy had worked during the war to defeat the English and thereby support the fledgling English colonies in their War for Independence. After a year of study, the results were presented to the NSSAR; and that organization in March, 1998, began accepting descendants of Spanish soldiers who had served in California.
    [Show full text]
  • Sonora, Mexico
    Higher Education in Regional and City Development Higher Education in Regional and City Higher Education in Regional and City Development Development SONORA, MEXICO, Sonora is one of the wealthiest states in Mexico and has made great strides in Sonora, building its human capital and skills. How can Sonora turn the potential of its universities and technological institutions into an active asset for economic and Mexico social development? How can it improve the equity, quality and relevance of education at all levels? Jaana Puukka, Susan Christopherson, This publication explores a range of helpful policy measures and institutional Patrick Dubarle, Jocelyne Gacel-Ávila, reforms to mobilise higher education for regional development. It is part of the series Vera Pavlakovich-Kochi of the OECD reviews of Higher Education in Regional and City Development. These reviews help mobilise higher education institutions for economic, social and cultural development of cities and regions. They analyse how the higher education system impacts upon regional and local development and bring together universities, other higher education institutions and public and private agencies to identify strategic goals and to work towards them. Sonora, Mexico CONTENTS Chapter 1. Human capital development, labour market and skills Chapter 2. Research, development and innovation Chapter 3. Social, cultural and environmental development Chapter 4. Globalisation and internationalisation Chapter 5. Capacity building for regional development ISBN 978- 92-64-19333-8 89 2013 01 1E1 Higher Education in Regional and City Development: Sonora, Mexico 2013 This work is published on the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of the Organisation or of the governments of its member countries.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Nogales General Plan
    City of Nogales General Plan Background and Current Conditions Volume City of Nogales General Plan Background and Current Conditions Volume City of Nogales General Plan Parks Open Sports Space Industry History Culture Prepared for: Prepared by: City of Nogales The Planning Center 1450 North Hohokam Drive 2 East Congress, Suite 600 Nogales, Arizona Tucson, Arizona Background and Current Conditions Volume City of Nogales General Plan Update Table of Contents Table of Contents i Acknowledgements ii Introduction and Overview 1 History and Background 12 Economic Development Framework 20 Background Analysis and Inventory 35 Nogales Demographics Profile 69 Housing and Household Characteristics 71 Parks, Recreation, Trails and OpenSpace 78 Technical Report Conclusions 84 Bibliography and References 86 Exhibits Exhibit 1: International and Regional Context 7 Exhibit 2: Local Context 8 Exhibit 3: Nogales Designated Growth Area 9 Exhibit 4: History of Annexation 19 Exhibit 5: Physical Setting 39 Exhibit 6: Existing Rivers and Washes 40 Exhibit 7: Topography 41 Exhibit 8: Vegetative Communities 42 Exhibit 9: Functionally Classified Roads 54 Exhibit 10: School Districts and Schools 62 Background and Current Conditions Volume Table of Contents Page i City of Nogales General Plan City of Nogales Department Directors Alejandro Barcenas, Public Works Director Danitza Lopez, Library Director Micah Gaudet, Housing Director Jeffery Sargent, Fire Chief Juan Guerra, City Engineer John E. Kissinger, Deputy City Manager Leticia Robinson, City Clerk Marcel Bachelier
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT of the INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PRELIMINARY DEPOSIT-TYPE MAP of NORTHWESTERN MEXICO by Kenneth R
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PRELIMINARY DEPOSIT-TYPE MAP OF NORTHWESTERN MEXICO By Kenneth R. Leonard U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 89-158 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. Any use of trade, product, firm, or industry names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Menlo Park, CA 1989 Table of Contents Page Introduction..................................................................................................... i Explanation of Data Fields.......................................................................... i-vi Table 1 Size Categories for Deposits....................................................................... vii References.................................................................................................... viii-xx Site Descriptions........................................................................................... 1-330 Appendix I List of Deposits Sorted by Deposit Type.............................................. A-1 to A-22 Appendix n Site Name Index...................................................................................... B-1 to B-10 Plate 1 Distribution of Mineral Deposits in Northwestern Mexico Insets: Figure 1. Los Gavilanes Tungsten District Figure 2. El Antimonio District Figure 3. Magdalena District Figure 4. Cananea District Preliminary Deposit-Type Map of
    [Show full text]
  • 84920 Sonora 7226001 Aconchi Aconchi 84923 Sonora 7226001 Aconchi Agua Caliente 84923 Sonora 7226001 Aconchi Barranca Las Higuer
    84920 SONORA 7226001 ACONCHI ACONCHI 84923 SONORA 7226001 ACONCHI AGUA CALIENTE 84923 SONORA 7226001 ACONCHI BARRANCA LAS HIGUERITAS 84929 SONORA 7226001 ACONCHI CHAVOVERACHI 84928 SONORA 7226001 ACONCHI EL RODEO (EL RODEO DE ACONCHI) 84925 SONORA 7226001 ACONCHI EL TARAIS 84929 SONORA 7226001 ACONCHI ESTABLO LOPEZ 84928 SONORA 7226001 ACONCHI HAVINANCHI 84928 SONORA 7226001 ACONCHI LA ALAMEDA 84928 SONORA 7226001 ACONCHI LA ALAMEDITA 84929 SONORA 7226001 ACONCHI LA ESTANCIA 84928 SONORA 7226001 ACONCHI LA HIGUERA 84923 SONORA 7226001 ACONCHI LA LOMA 84929 SONORA 7226001 ACONCHI LA MISION 84933 SONORA 7226001 ACONCHI LA SAUCEDA 84924 SONORA 7226001 ACONCHI LAS ALBONDIGAS 84930 SONORA 7226001 ACONCHI LAS GARZAS 84924 SONORA 7226001 ACONCHI LOS ALISOS 84930 SONORA 7226001 ACONCHI MAICOBABI 84923 SONORA 7226001 ACONCHI RAFAEL NORIEGA SOUFFLE 84925 SONORA 7226001 ACONCHI REPRESO DE ROMO 84928 SONORA 7226001 ACONCHI SAN PABLO (SAN PABLO DE ACONCHI) 84934 SONORA 7226001 ACONCHI TEPUA (EL CARRICITO) 84923 SONORA 7226001 ACONCHI TRES ALAMOS 84935 SONORA 7226001 ACONCHI VALENCIA 84310 SONORA 7226002 AGUA PRIETA 18 DE AGOSTO (CORRAL DE PALOS) 84303 SONORA 7226002 AGUA PRIETA ABEL ACOSTA ANAYA 84270 SONORA 7226002 AGUA PRIETA ACAPULCO 84313 SONORA 7226002 AGUA PRIETA ADAN ZORILLA 84303 SONORA 7226002 AGUA PRIETA ADOLFO ORTIZ 84307 SONORA 7226002 AGUA PRIETA AGUA BLANCA 84303 SONORA 7226002 AGUA PRIETA ALBERGUE DIVINA PROVIDENCIA 84303 SONORA 7226002 AGUA PRIETA ALBERTO GRACIA GRIJALVA 84303 SONORA 7226002 AGUA PRIETA ALFONSO GARCIA ROMO 84303 SONORA
    [Show full text]
  • Iterative Driver-Response Dynamics of Human-Environment Interactions in the Arizona-Sonora Borderlands 1,2, 1 CHRISTOPHER A
    SPECIAL FEATURE: SUSTAINABILITY ON THE U.S./MEXICO BORDER Iterative driver-response dynamics of human-environment interactions in the Arizona-Sonora borderlands 1,2, 1 CHRISTOPHER A. SCOTT AND STEPHANIE J. BUECHLER 1School of Geography & Development, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721 USA 2Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721 USA Citation: Scott, C. A., and S. J. Buechler. 2013. Iterative driver-response dynamics of human-environment interactions in the Arizona-Sonora borderlands. Ecosphere 4(1):2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/ES12-00273.1 Abstract. In complex social-ecological systems, human and physical processes mutually condition one another through co-adaptation at multiple scales from the local to the global. For this paper we modified a driver-response conceptual model of social-ecological interactions by considering the degree to which each binary set of processes (human or physical) is simultaneously a driver and a response to global change. Processes that we understood to be mutually conditioned offered greater potential compared to solely social or ecological communities to adapt to demographic and economic change, on the one hand, and to climate, water resources, and ecosystems dynamics, on the other. By considering case material from the United States–Mexico border region, we characterized social-ecological interactions along a continuum from those acting exclusively as drivers to others reacting to change primarily as responses. We considered water resources to integrate multiple global change processes including climate change and variability, ecosystem resilience, and human water demands for a variety of purposes. Thus, we examined in detail two watersheds in the Arizona–Sonora borderlands representing mutually conditioned social-ecological systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Connecting Mountain Islands and Desert Seas
    The Forgotten Flora of la Frontera Thomas R. Van Devender and Ana Lilia Reina Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum, Tucson, AZ Abstract—About 1,500 collections from within 100 kilometers of the Arizona border in Sonora yielded noteworthy records for 164 plants including 44 new species (12 non-native) for Sonora and 12 (six non-native) for Mexico, conservation species, and regional endemics. Many com- mon widespread species were poorly collected. Southern range extensions (120 species) were more numerous than northern extensions (20), although nine potentially occur in Arizona. Non-native species dispersed along highways and escaped from cultivation. The Turkish poppy (Glaucium corniculatum), established near Agua Prieta, may reach Arizona. African buffelgrass (Pennisetum ciliare) and Natal grass (Melinis repens) are rapidly expanding into new, higher elevation areas. Beginning with Howard Gentry, Forrest Shreve, and Ira Introduction Wiggins in the 1930s, botanists from the United States rushed In northeastern Sonora, grassland and Chihuahuan southward to the tantalizing tropical deciduous forests of the desertscrub extend across the border from Arizona and Río Mayo region of southeastern Sonora, the treasures of the New Mexico. Isolated “sky island” mountains support oak Sierra Madre Occidental in eastern Sonora (Gentry 1942; woodlands and pine-oak forests in the Apachean Highlands Martin et al. 1998), or the scenic Sonoran Desert (Shreve and Ecoregion, the northwestern Madrean Archipelago extend- Wiggins 1964). Botanists from Mexico City 2,200 km to the ing northeast of the “mainland” Sierra Madre Occidental. southeast only occasionally visited Sonora. Solis G. (1993) and Finger-like northern extensions of foothills thornscrub lie in Fishbein et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Biographical Data on Juan Mutista De Anza Thousands of Mexicans Do
    I Legislative Reference Seryice LIBRARY OF CONGRESS WASHINGTON ;3#wz@uMb’sM (Translation) I Biographical data on Juan Mutista de Anza Thousands of Mexicans do not know of the feats of the great explorer and colonizer, Military Governor of Sonora, fouv~er of the present metropolis and port of San Francisco, California, Juan Bautista de Anza, whose stron~ person- &Lity was so clearly outlined when he assumed the governorship of the Province of New Mexico, on appointment by Charles III of Spain at the end of the eigh- 1 teenth century. This distinguished Sonoran was born in Fronteras in 1735. His father was I Captain of the Presidio of Fronteras and Provisional Governor of the State of I Sonora. I Don Juan Bautiste de Anza started his military career in 1752, enlisting I as a volunteer against Apache raids, and attained the grade of lieutenant in 1758. IrA the same year, in July, he assisted in the. campaign against the Apaches in Gila valley, and earned, for his services, an increase in rank to captain, being also named at the same time Comuamiant of the Presidio of !i!ubac . He started numerous effective ccmpaigns sgainst the Apaches, who were the eternal frontier enemies, and stifled an uprising of more than 3,000 Indians. Ee inherited a desire from his ancestors to open a route to California, and , under the influence of the missionary Garces, he took the leadership of an expedition to the Pacific coast, in order to open communication between Sonora and Upper California. He received the appropri&te permission on -2- January 8, 1774, leaving at the head of 34 men.
    [Show full text]