DOCSLIB.ORG

The Matrix Cookbook [ ]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Matrix Cookbook [ ] The Matrix Cookbook [ http://matrixcookbook.com ] Kaare Brandt Petersen Michael Syskind Pedersen Version: November 14, 2008 What is this? These pages are a collection of facts (identities, approxima- tions, inequalities, relations, ...) about matrices and matters relating to them. It is collected in this form for the convenience of anyone who wants a quick desktop reference . Disclaimer: The identities, approximations and relations presented here were obviously not invented but collected, borrowed and copied from a large amount of sources. These sources include similar but shorter notes found on the internet and appendices in books - see the references for a full list. Errors: Very likely there are errors, typos, and mistakes for which we apolo- gize and would be grateful to receive corrections at [email protected]. Its ongoing: The project of keeping a large repository of relations involving matrices is naturally ongoing and the version will be apparent from the date in the header. Suggestions: Your suggestion for additional content or elaboration of some topics is most welcome at [email protected]. Keywords: Matrix algebra, matrix relations, matrix identities, derivative of determinant, derivative of inverse matrix, differentiate a matrix. Acknowledgements: We would like to thank the following for contributions and suggestions: Bill Baxter, Brian Templeton, Christian Rishøj, Christian Schr¨oppel Douglas L. Theobald, Esben Hoegh-Rasmussen, Glynne Casteel, Jan Larsen, Jun Bin Gao, J¨urgen Struckmeier, Kamil Dedecius, Korbinian Strim- mer, Lars Christiansen, Lars Kai Hansen, Leland Wilkinson, Liguo He, Loic Thibaut, Miguel Bar˜ao,Ole Winther, Pavel Sakov, Stephan Hattinger, Vasile Sima, Vincent Rabaud, Zhaoshui He. We would also like thank The Oticon Foundation for funding our PhD studies. 1 CONTENTS CONTENTS Contents 1 Basics 5 1.1 Trace and Determinants . 5 1.2 The Special Case 2x2 . 5 2 Derivatives 7 2.1 Derivatives of a Determinant . 7 2.2 Derivatives of an Inverse . 8 2.3 Derivatives of Eigenvalues . 9 2.4 Derivatives of Matrices, Vectors and Scalar Forms . 9 2.5 Derivatives of Traces . 11 2.6 Derivatives of vector norms . 13 2.7 Derivatives of matrix norms . 13 2.8 Derivatives of Structured Matrices . 14 3 Inverses 16 3.1 Basic . 16 3.2 Exact Relations . 17 3.3 Implication on Inverses . 19 3.4 Approximations . 19 3.5 Generalized Inverse . 20 3.6 Pseudo Inverse . 20 4 Complex Matrices 23 4.1 Complex Derivatives . 23 4.2 Higher order and non-linear derivatives . 26 4.3 Inverse of complex sum . 26 5 Solutions and Decompositions 27 5.1 Solutions to linear equations . 27 5.2 Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors . 29 5.3 Singular Value Decomposition . 30 5.4 Triangular Decomposition . 32 5.5 LU decomposition . 32 5.6 LDM decomposition . 32 5.7 LDL decompositions . 32 6 Statistics and Probability 33 6.1 Definition of Moments . 33 6.2 Expectation of Linear Combinations . 34 6.3 Weighted Scalar Variable . 35 Petersen & Pedersen, The Matrix Cookbook, Version: November 14, 2008, Page 2 CONTENTS CONTENTS 7 Multivariate Distributions 36 7.1 Cauchy . 36 7.2 Dirichlet . 36 7.3 Normal . 36 7.4 Normal-Inverse Gamma . 36 7.5 Gaussian . 36 7.6 Multinomial . 36 7.7 Student’s t . 36 7.8 Wishart . 37 7.9 Wishart, Inverse . 38 8 Gaussians 39 8.1 Basics . 39 8.2 Moments . 41 8.3 Miscellaneous . 43 8.4 Mixture of Gaussians . 44 9 Special Matrices 45 9.1 Block matrices . 45 9.2 Discrete Fourier Transform Matrix, The . 46 9.3 Hermitian Matrices and skew-Hermitian . 47 9.4 Idempotent Matrices . 48 9.5 Orthogonal matrices . 48 9.6 Positive Definite and Semi-definite Matrices . 50 9.7 Singleentry Matrix, The . 51 9.8 Symmetric, Skew-symmetric/Antisymmetric . 53 9.9 Toeplitz Matrices . 54 9.10 Transition matrices . 55 9.11 Units, Permutation and Shift . 56 9.12 Vandermonde Matrices . 57 10 Functions and Operators 58 10.1 Functions and Series . 58 10.2 Kronecker and Vec Operator . 59 10.3 Vector Norms . 61 10.4 Matrix Norms . 61 10.5 Rank . 62 10.6 Integral Involving Dirac Delta Functions . 62 10.7 Miscellaneous . 63 A One-dimensional Results 64 A.1 Gaussian . 64 A.2 One Dimensional Mixture of Gaussians . 65 B Proofs and Details 67 B.1 Misc Proofs . 67 Petersen & Pedersen, The Matrix Cookbook, Version: November 14, 2008, Page 3 CONTENTS CONTENTS Notation and Nomenclature A Matrix Aij Matrix indexed for some purpose Ai Matrix indexed for some purpose Aij Matrix indexed for some purpose An Matrix indexed for some purpose or The n.th power of a square matrix A−1 The inverse matrix of the matrix A A+ The pseudo inverse matrix of the matrix A (see Sec. 3.6) A1/2 The square root of a matrix (if unique), not elementwise (A)ij The (i, j).th entry of the matrix A Aij The (i, j).th entry of the matrix A [A]ij The ij-submatrix, i.e. A with i.th row and j.th column deleted a Vector ai Vector indexed for some purpose ai The i.th element of the vector a a Scalar <z Real part of a scalar <z Real part of a vector <Z Real part of a matrix =z Imaginary part of a scalar =z Imaginary part of a vector =Z Imaginary part of a matrix det(A) Determinant of A Tr(A) Trace of the matrix A diag(A) Diagonal matrix of the matrix A, i.e. (diag(A))ij = δijAij eig(A) Eigenvalues of the matrix A vec(A) The vector-version of the matrix A (see Sec. 10.2.2) sup Supremum of a set ||A|| Matrix norm (subscript if any denotes what norm) AT Transposed matrix A−T The inverse of the transposed and vice versa, A−T = (A−1)T = (AT )−1. A∗ Complex conjugated matrix AH Transposed and complex conjugated matrix (Hermitian) A ◦ B Hadamard (elementwise) product A ⊗ B Kronecker product 0 The null matrix. Zero in all entries. I The identity matrix Jij The single-entry matrix, 1 at (i, j) and zero elsewhere Σ A positive definite matrix Λ A diagonal matrix Petersen & Pedersen, The Matrix Cookbook, Version: November 14, 2008, Page 4 1 BASICS 1 Basics (AB)−1 = B−1A−1 (1) (ABC...)−1 = ...C−1B−1A−1 (2) (AT )−1 = (A−1)T (3) (A + B)T = AT + BT (4) (AB)T = BT AT (5) (ABC...)T = ...CT BT AT (6) (AH )−1 = (A−1)H (7) (A + B)H = AH + BH (8) (AB)H = BH AH (9) (ABC...)H = ...CH BH AH (10) 1.1 Trace and Determinants P Tr(A) = iAii (11) P Tr(A) = iλi, λi = eig(A) (12) Tr(A) = Tr(AT ) (13) Tr(AB) = Tr(BA) (14) Tr(A + B) = Tr(A) + Tr(B) (15) Tr(ABC) = Tr(BCA) = Tr(CAB) (16) Q det(A) = iλi λi = eig(A) (17) n n×n det(cA) = c det(A), if A ∈ R (18) det(AT ) = det(A) (19) det(AB) = det(A) det(B) (20) det(A−1) = 1/ det(A) (21) det(An) = det(A)n (22) det(I + uvT ) = 1 + uT v (23) det(I + εA) =∼ 1 + εTr(A), ε small (24) 1.2 The Special Case 2x2 Consider the matrix A A A A = 11 12 A21 A22 Determinant and trace det(A) = A11A22 − A12A21 (25) Tr(A) = A11 + A22 (26) Petersen & Pedersen, The Matrix Cookbook, Version: November 14, 2008, Page 5 1.2 The Special Case 2x2 1 BASICS Eigenvalues λ2 − λ · Tr(A) + det(A) = 0 Tr(A) + pTr(A)2 − 4 det(A) Tr(A) − pTr(A)2 − 4 det(A) λ = λ = 1 2 2 2 λ1 + λ2 = Tr(A) λ1λ2 = det(A) Eigenvectors A12 A12 v1 ∝ v2 ∝ λ1 − A11 λ2 − A11 Inverse 1 A −A A−1 = 22 12 (27) det(A) −A21 A11 Petersen & Pedersen, The Matrix Cookbook, Version: November 14, 2008, Page 6 2 DERIVATIVES 2 Derivatives This section is covering differentiation of a number of expressions with respect to a matrix X. Note that it is always assumed that X has no special structure, i.e. that the elements of X are independent (e.g. not symmetric, Toeplitz, positive definite). See section 2.8 for differentiation of structured matrices. The basic assumptions can be written in a formula as ∂Xkl = δikδlj (28) ∂Xij that is for e.g. vector forms, ∂x ∂x ∂x ∂x ∂x ∂x = i = = i ∂y i ∂y ∂y i ∂yi ∂y ij ∂yj The following rules are general and very useful when deriving the differential of an expression ([19]): ∂A = 0 (A is a constant) (29) ∂(αX) = α∂X (30) ∂(X + Y) = ∂X + ∂Y (31) ∂(Tr(X)) = Tr(∂X) (32) ∂(XY) = (∂X)Y + X(∂Y) (33) ∂(X ◦ Y) = (∂X) ◦ Y + X ◦ (∂Y) (34) ∂(X ⊗ Y) = (∂X) ⊗ Y + X ⊗ (∂Y) (35) ∂(X−1) = −X−1(∂X)X−1 (36) ∂(det(X)) = det(X)Tr(X−1∂X) (37) ∂(ln(det(X))) = Tr(X−1∂X) (38) ∂XT = (∂X)T (39) ∂XH = (∂X)H (40) 2.1 Derivatives of a Determinant 2.1.1 General form ∂ det(Y) ∂Y = det(Y)Tr Y−1 (41) ∂x ∂x " " # ∂ ∂ det(Y) ∂ ∂Y ∂x = det(Y) Tr Y−1 ∂x ∂x ∂x ∂Y ∂Y +Tr Y−1 Tr Y−1 ∂x ∂x # ∂Y ∂Y −Tr Y−1 Y−1 (42) ∂x ∂x Petersen & Pedersen, The Matrix Cookbook, Version: November 14, 2008, Page 7 2.2 Derivatives of an Inverse 2 DERIVATIVES 2.1.2 Linear forms ∂ det(X) = det(X)(X−1)T (43) ∂X X ∂ det(X) Xjk = δij det(X) (44) ∂Xik k ∂ det(AXB) = det(AXB)(X−1)T = det(AXB)(XT )−1 (45) ∂X 2.1.3 Square forms If X is square and invertible, then ∂ det(XT AX) = 2 det(XT AX)X−T (46) ∂X If X is not square but A is symmetric, then ∂ det(XT AX) = 2 det(XT AX)AX(XT AX)−1 (47) ∂X If X is not square and A is not symmetric, then ∂ det(XT AX) = det(XT AX)(AX(XT AX)−1 + AT X(XT AT X)−1) (48) ∂X 2.1.4 Other nonlinear forms Some special cases are (See [9, 7]) ∂ ln det(XT X)| = 2(X+)T (49) ∂X ∂ ln det(XT X) = −2XT (50) ∂X+ ∂ ln | det(X)| = (X−1)T = (XT )−1 (51) ∂X ∂ det(Xk) = k det(Xk)X−T (52) ∂X 2.2 Derivatives of an Inverse From [27] we have the basic identity ∂Y−1 ∂Y = −Y−1 Y−1 (53) ∂x ∂x Petersen & Pedersen, The Matrix Cookbook, Version: November 14, 2008, Page 8 2.3 Derivatives of Eigenvalues 2 DERIVATIVES from which it follows −1 ∂(X )kl −1 −1 = −(X )ki(X )jl (54) ∂Xij ∂aT X−1b = −X−T abT X−T (55) ∂X ∂ det(X−1) = − det(X−1)(X−1)T (56) ∂X ∂Tr(AX−1B) = −(X−1BAX−1)T (57) ∂X ∂Tr((X + A)−1) = −((X + A)−1(X + A)−1)T (58) ∂X From [32] we have the following result: Let A be an n × n invertible square matrix, W be the inverse of A, and J(A) is an n × n -variate and differentiable function with
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Information-Theoretic Approaches to Portfolio Selection
    Information-theoretic approaches to portfolio selection Nathan LASSANCE Doctoral Thesis 2 | 2020 Université catholique de Louvain LOUVAIN INSTITUTE OF DATA ANALYSIS AND MODELING IN ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS (LIDAM) Universite´ catholique de Louvain Louvain School of Management LIDAM & Louvain Finance Doctoral Thesis Information-theoretic approaches to portfolio selection Nathan Lassance Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Docteur en sciences ´economiques et de gestion Dissertation committee: Prof. Fr´ed´ericVrins (UCLouvain, BE), Advisor Prof. Kris Boudt (Ghent University, BE) Prof. Victor DeMiguel (London Business School, UK) Prof. Guofu Zhou (Washington University, USA) Prof. Marco Saerens (UCLouvain, BE), President Academic year 2019-2020 \Find a job you enjoy doing, and you will never have to work a day in your life." Mark Twain Contents Abstract vii Acknowledgments ix Research accomplishments xii List of Figures xii List of Tables xv List of Notation xvii Introduction1 1 Research background7 1.1 Mean-variance approaches..........................7 1.1.1 Definitions...............................8 1.1.2 Estimation risk............................ 10 1.1.3 Robust mean-variance portfolios................... 13 1.2 Higher-moment approaches.......................... 19 1.2.1 Efficient portfolios.......................... 21 1.2.2 Downside-risk criteria......................... 23 1.2.3 Indirect approaches.......................... 25 1.3 Risk-parity approaches............................ 25 1.3.1 Asset-risk parity........................... 26 1.3.2 Factor-risk parity........................... 28 1.3.3 Criticisms............................... 29 1.4 Information-theoretic approaches...................... 30 1.5 Thesis contributions............................. 32 2 Minimum R´enyi entropy portfolios 35 2.1 Introduction.................................. 35 2.2 The notion of entropy............................ 36 2.2.1 Shannon entropy........................... 37 2.2.2 R´enyi entropy............................
    [Show full text]
  • Margrabe Formulas for a Simple Bivariate Exponential Variance-Gamma Price Process (II) Statistical Estimation and Application
    International Journal of Scientific and Innovative Mathematical Research (IJSIMR) Volume I, Issue I, August- 2013, PP 33-44 www.arcjournals.org Margrabe Formulas for a Simple Bivariate Exponential Variance-Gamma Price Process (II) Statistical Estimation and Application Werner Hürlimann Wolters Kluwer Financial Services, Seefeldstrasse 69, CH-8008 Zürich, Switzerland. [email protected] Received: 20-06-2013 Revised: 21-07-2013 Accepted: 24-07-2013 Abstract: A multivariate moment method for the simple multivariate variance-gamma distribution is considered. It takes into account the star products of both the coskewness and cokurtosis tensors. The model parameters depend upon the solution of a sextic equation, and the covariance matrix is functionally dependent upon coskweness and cokurtosis. The method enables simultaneous estimation of the parameters given sample estimates of the mean vector, coskewness vector and cokurtosis matrix. Application to the estimation of the bivariate variance-gamma model for the Standard & Poors 500 and NASDAQ 100 stock market indices is undertaken. The statistical fitting results are used to compare the original Margrabe formula with a variance-gamma exchange option pricing formula derived through application of the state- price deflator approach. Keywords: multivariate variance-gamma, coskewness, cokurtosis, exchange option, stock market. 1. INTRODUCTION In the first part of the present study, a simple multivariate exponential variance-gamma price process has been considered as alternative to the usual multivariate exponential Gaussian process. Based on it a state-price deflator has been constructed and applied to derive pricing formulas for the exchange option with a bivariate exponential variance-gamma deflated price process. It has been observed that the simple model is easy to work with but has some serious drawbacks.
    [Show full text]
  • Phd Dissertation
    ©Copyright 2010 Minfeng Zhu Portfolio Optimization with Tail Risk Measures and Non-Normal Returns Minfeng Zhu A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2010 Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Department of Statistics University of Washington Graduate School This is to certify that I have examined this copy of a doctoral dissertation by Minfeng Zhu and have found that it is complete and satisfactory in all respects, and that any and all revisions required by the final examining committee have been made. Chair of the Supervisory Committee: R. Douglas Martin Reading Committee: R. Douglas Martin Andrew Clark Eric W Zivot Date: In presenting this dissertation in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the doctoral degree at the University of Washington, I agree that the Library shall make its copies freely available for inspection. I further agree that extensive copying of the dissertation is allowable only for scholarly purposes, consistent with “fair use” as prescribed in the U.S. Copyright Law. Requests for copying or reproduction of this dissertation may be referred to ProQuest Information and Learning, 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48106- 1346, 1-800-521-0600, to whom the author has granted “the right to reproduce and sell (a) copies of the manuscript in microform and/or (b) printed copies of the manuscript made from microform.” Signature ________________________ Date ____________________________ University of Washington Abstract Portfolio Optimization with Tail Risk Measures and Non-Normal Returns Minfeng Zhu Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Professor R. Douglas Martin Department of Statistics The traditional Markowitz mean-variance portfolio optimization theory uses volatility as the sole measure of risk.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Class of Tests of Contagion with Applications
    A New Class of Tests of Contagion with Applications % Renée Fry , Vance L. Martin∗ and Chrismin Tang∗ %CAMA, Australian National University & CERF, University of Cambridge ∗University of Melbourne January 2008 Abstract A new class of tests of contagion is proposed which identifies transmission channels of financial market crises through changes in higher order moments of the distribution of returns such as coskewness. Applying the framework to test for contagion in real estate and equity markets following the Hong Kong crisis in 1997-1998 and the US subprime mortgage crisis in 2007 shows that the coskew- ness based tests of contagion detect additional channels that are not identified by the correlation based tests. Implications of contagion in pricing exchange options where there is a change in higher order comoments of returns on the underlying assets, are also investigated. Keywords: Contagion testing, coskewness, Lagrange multiplier tests, Hong Kong crisis, subprime mortgage crisis, exchange options. ∗We would like to thank the editor, associate editor and two referees of the journal. Special thanks to Shaun Bond for providing the real estate data. Also thanks to Ross Maller and partici- pants at the FIRN Doctoral Conference, Sydney, 2005; the Global Finance Conference, Melbourne, 2007; ESAM07, Brisbane 2007; and the Singapore Econometrics Study Group, Singapore 2007. Fry acknowledges funding from ARC grant DP0556371. Corresponding author is Vance L. Martin, email: [email protected]. 1 Introduction A common empirical characteristic of financial crises is that asset return volatility increases during a crisis while average returns fall. This phenomenon is highlighted in the top panel of Table 1 which shows average daily returns on a Hong Kong securitized real estate index decreasing from 0.08% prior to the Hong Kong crisis in October 1997, to 0.45% during the crisis, whilst daily volatility increases respectively from 1.94%2 − to 15.47%2.
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Statistics Objective
    Basic Statistics Objective Interpret and apply the mean, standard deviation, and variance of a random variable. Calculate the mean, standard deviation, and variance of a discrete random variable. Interpret and calculate the expected value of a discrete random variable. Calculate and interpret the covariance and correlation between two random variables. Calculate the mean and variance of sums of variables. Describe the four central moments of a statistical variable or distribution: mean, variance, skewness, and kurtosis. Interpret the skewness and kurtosis of a statistical distribution, and interpret the concepts of coskewness and cokurtosis. Describe and interpret the best linear unbiased estimator. riskmacro.com 3 Basic Statistics ➢ Introduction: ➢The word statistic is used to refers to data and the methods we use to analyze data. ➢Descriptive statistics are used to summarize the important characteristics of large data sets. ➢Inferential statistic, pertain to the procedures used to make forecasts, estimates, or judgments about a large set of data on the basis of the statistical characteristics of a smaller set ( a sample). ➢A population is defined as the set of all possible members of a stated group. ➢Measures of central tendency identify the center, or average, of a data set. Median Mode Population Mean Sample Mean Example: Calculate Mean, Mode & Median from the following data set: 12%, 25%, 34%, 15%, 19%, 44%, 54%, 34%, 22%, 28%, 17%, 24%. riskmacro.com 4 Basic Statistics ➢ Introduction: Geometric Mean of Returns Example: Geometric mean return For the last three years, the returns for Acme Corporation common stock have been -9.34%, 23.45%, and 8.92%. compute the compound rate of return over the 3-year period.
    [Show full text]
  • Idiosyncratic Coskewness and Equity Return Anomalies by Fousseni Chabi-Yo and Jun Yang
    Working Paper/Document de travail 2010-11 Idiosyncratic Coskewness and Equity Return Anomalies by Fousseni Chabi-Yo and Jun Yang Bank of Canada Working Paper 2010-11 May 2010 Idiosyncratic Coskewness and Equity Return Anomalies by Fousseni Chabi-Yo1 and Jun Yang2 1Fisher College of Business Ohio State University Columbus, Ohio, U.S.A. 43210-1144 [email protected] 2Financial Markets Department Bank of Canada Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0G9 [email protected] Bank of Canada working papers are theoretical or empirical works-in-progress on subjects in economics and finance. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors. No responsibility for them should be attributed to the Bank of Canada. 2 ISSN 1701-9397 © 2010 Bank of Canada Acknowledgements We are grateful to Bill Bobey, Oliver Boguth, Jean-Sébastien Fontaine, Scott Hendry, Kewei Hou, Michael Lemmon, Jesus Sierra-Jiménez, René Stulz, Ingrid Werner, and seminar participants at the Bank of Canada, the Ohio State University, and the Northern Finance Association 2009 conference. We thank Kenneth French for making a large amount of historical data publicly available in his online data library. We welcome comments, including references to related papers we have inadvertently overlooked. Fousseni Chabi-Yo would like to thank the Dice Center for Financial Economics for financial support. ii Abstract In this paper, we show that in a model where investors have heterogeneous preferences, the expected return of risky assets depends on the idiosyncratic coskewness beta, which measures the co-movement of the individual stock variance and the market return. We find that there is a negative (positive) relation between idiosyncratic coskewness and equity returns when idiosyncratic coskewness betas are positive (negative).
    [Show full text]
  • The Matrix Cookbook
    The Matrix Cookbook Kaare Brandt Petersen Michael Syskind Pedersen Version: February 16, 2006 What is this? These pages are a collection of facts (identities, approxima- tions, inequalities, relations, ...) about matrices and matters relating to them. It is collected in this form for the convenience of anyone who wants a quick desktop reference . Disclaimer: The identities, approximations and relations presented here were obviously not invented but collected, borrowed and copied from a large amount of sources. These sources include similar but shorter notes found on the internet and appendices in books - see the references for a full list. Errors: Very likely there are errors, typos, and mistakes for which we apolo- gize and would be grateful to receive corrections at [email protected]. Its ongoing: The project of keeping a large repository of relations involving matrices is naturally ongoing and the version will be apparent from the date in the header. Suggestions: Your suggestion for additional content or elaboration of some topics is most welcome at [email protected]. Keywords: Matrix algebra, matrix relations, matrix identities, derivative of determinant, derivative of inverse matrix, differentiate a matrix. Acknowledgements: We would like to thank the following for contribu- tions and suggestions: Christian Rishøj, Douglas L. Theobald, Esben Hoegh- Rasmussen, Lars Christiansen, and Vasile Sima. We would also like thank The Oticon Foundation for funding our PhD studies. 1 CONTENTS CONTENTS Contents 1 Basics 5 1.1 Trace and Determinants . 5 1.2 The Special Case 2x2 . 5 2 Derivatives 7 2.1 Derivatives of a Determinant . 7 2.2 Derivatives of an Inverse .
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Empirical Finance Conditional
    Journal of Empirical Finance 58 (2020) 412–435 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Empirical Finance journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jempfin Conditional extreme risk, black swan hedging, and asset pricesI S. Ghon Rhee a,<, Feng (Harry) Wu b,< a Shidler College of Business, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Room D-311b, 2404 Maile Way, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA b Department of Accountancy, Lingnan University, SEK201/3, 8 Castle Peak Road, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China ARTICLEINFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Motivated by the asset pricing theory with safety-first preference, we introduce and oper- Conditional extreme risk ationalize a conditional extreme risk (CER) measure to describe expected stock performance Black swan hedging conditional on a small-probability market downturn (black swan). We document a significant Safety-first CER premium in the cross-section of expected returns. We also demonstrate that CER explains Extreme value theory the premia to downside beta, coskewness, and cokurtosis. CER provides distinct information Asset pricing regarding black swan hedging that cannot be captured by co-crash-based tail dependence measures. As we find that the pricing effect is stronger among black swan hedging stocks, this distinction helps explain the absence of premium to tail dependence. 1. Introduction Financial economists have long recognized the importance of extraordinarily adverse market conditions in asset pricing (Roy, 1952; Menezes et al., 1980; Rietz, 1988). To risk-averse investors, an asset with declining value in a severely deteriorating market should be less valuable, while an asset performing well during rare market downturns (black swans) should be especially desirable. In other words, whether an asset contributes to small-probability (but potentially large) market calamities or hedges against black swans indicates its riskiness under conditions of extreme market drops.
    [Show full text]
  • Conditional Skewness in Asset Pricing Tests
    THE JOURNAL OF FINANCE • VOL. LV, NO. 3 • JUNE 2000 Conditional Skewness in Asset Pricing Tests CAMPBELL R. HARVEY and AKHTAR SIDDIQUE* ABSTRACT If asset returns have systematic skewness, expected returns should include re- wards for accepting this risk. We formalize this intuition with an asset pricing model that incorporates conditional skewness. Our results show that conditional skewness helps explain the cross-sectional variation of expected returns across assets and is significant even when factors based on size and book-to-market are included. Systematic skewness is economically important and commands a risk premium, on average, of 3.60 percent per year. Our results suggest that the mo- mentum effect is related to systematic skewness. The low expected return momen- tum portfolios have higher skewness than high expected return portfolios. THE SINGLE FACTOR CAPITAL ASSET PRICING MODEL ~CAPM! of Sharpe ~1964! and Lintner ~1965! has come under recent scrutiny. Tests indicate that the cross- asset variation in expected returns cannot be explained by the market beta alone. For example, a growing number of studies show that “fundamental” variables such as size, book-to-market value, and price to earnings ratios account for a sizeable portion of the cross-sectional variation in expected returns ~see, e.g., Chan, Hamao, and Lakonishok ~1991! and Fama and French ~1992!!. Fama and French ~1995! document the importance of SMB ~the dif- ference between the return on a portfolio of small size stocks and the return on a portfolio of large size stocks! and HML ~the difference between the return on a portfolio of high book-to-market value stocks and the return on a portfolio of low book-to-market value stocks!.
    [Show full text]
  • Downside Risk and the Momentum Effect
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES DOWNSIDE RISK AND THE MOMENTUM EFFECT Andrew Ang Joseph Chen Yuhang Xing Working Paper 8643 http://www.nber.org/papers/w8643 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 December 2001 The authors would like to thank Brad Barber, Alon Brav, Geert Bekaert, John Cochrane, Randy Cohen, Kent Daniel, Bob Dittmar, Cam Harvey, David Hirschleiffer, Qing Li, Terence Lim, Bob Stambaugh, Akhtar Siddique and Zhenyu Wang for insightful discussions. We especially thank Bob Hodrick for detailed comments. We thank seminar participants at Columbia University and USC for helpful comments. This paper is funded by a Q-Group research grant. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Bureau of Economic Research. © 2001 by Andrew Ang, Joseph Chen and Yuhang Xing. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. Downside Risk and the Momentum Effect Andrew Ang, Joseph Chen and Yuhang Xing NBER Working Paper No. 8643 December 2001 JEL No. C12, C15, C32, G12 ABSTRACT Stocks with greater downside risk, which is measured by higher correlations conditional on downside moves of the market, have higher returns. After controlling for the market beta, the size effect and the book-to-market effect, the average rate of return on stocks with the greatest downside risk exceeds the average rate of return on stocks with the least downside risk by 6.55% per annum. Downside risk is important for explaining the cross-section of expected returns.
    [Show full text]
  • Skewness and Cokurtosis
    Is RMB a Safe Haven Currency? Evidence from Conditional Coskewness and Cokurtosis • Xin Cheng1 , Hongyi Chen2, Yinggang Zhou1* • Xiamen University, SOE & WISE • Hong Kong Monetary Authority Safe Haven Currencies Habib and Stracca (2012) •Safe-haven currencies are good hedge against financial stress •Traditional safe haven currencies: US dollar, Japanese Yen. Motivation US dollar’s performance in the event of the crisis on Sep. 2008 Motivation Japanese Yen’s performance in the event of the crisis on Sep. 2008 Motivation RMB’s performance in the event of the crisis on Sep. 2008 Motivation Campbell, Medeiros and Viceira (2010) •US dollar, Euro and Swiss franc moved against world equity markets •Their findings are based on correlation only Co-movement is not just correlation •Correlation is linear co-movement Asset returns have long (usually left tail) and fat tails, especially in the case of extreme events •Coskewness and Cokurtosis is nonlinear co- movement Motivation Investors have preferences beyond mean & variance •Skewness preference is about “prudence” (Kimball, 1990) •A prudent investor will seek higher (positive) skewness (Rubinstein, 1973). •Kurtosis preference is about “Temperance” (Denuit and Eeckhoudt, 2010) •A temperate investor will seek lower (negative) kurtosis (Kraus and Litzenberger, 1976) Motivation Higher-order-moment CAPM for stock market •Rubinstein (1973) , Kraus and Litzenberger (1976) •Harvey and Siddque (2000), Dittmar (2002) Recent renewed interest and extension to (international) stock, bond and/or option markets
    [Show full text]
  • Coskewness Risk Decomposition
    Coskewness Risk Decomposition Leon Zolotoy Melbourne Business School, University of Melbourne Petko S. Kalev Centre for Applied Financial Studies, University of South Australia Business School This draft 10 September 2013 Abstract This paper investigates the relative importance of aggregate cash–flow and discount–rate news components in the context of higher–moment asset pricing model of Kraus and Litzenberger (1976) which includes coskewness risk. We break down coskewness of the stock with the market into the coskewness with the cash–flow news, coskewness with the discount–rate news and the covariance with the product of the two — the covariation risk. Using US data from 1963 to 2010, we observe that stocks with high past returns have higher exposure to the covariation risk in comparison to the stocks with low past returns. We also document positive and economically significant market price of the covariation risk, while no such evidence is found for the cash–flow and discount–rate components of the coskewness risk. When augmented with the covariation risk component, the two–beta model of Campbell and Vuolteenaho (2004a) captures about 73% of the return variation across size/book–to– market, size/momentum and industry–sorted portfolios. In addition, we complement our analysis by examining the effects of the coskewness component on the expected rate of return of individual stocks using the implied cost of equity capital approach. Once again, we find the covariation risk to be the dominant factor that drives the positive relation between the expected returns and coskewness risk. JEL classification: G12, G14 Keywords: Asset pricing; Coskewness risk; Cash–flow news; Discount–rate news; Momentum.
    [Show full text]