Rising to the Challenge

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rising to the Challenge Conservation across the Commonwealth Spring 2007 ©Kenneth J. Howard ©Kenneth Humpback whale in Silver Shoals Bank, Dominican Republic Rising to the Challenge “For all at last returns to the sea – to Oceanus, A new wave of conservation strategies emerges the ocean river, like the The Massachusetts coast meanders for 1,500 miles across everfl owing stream a patchwork of diverse landscapes, attracting millions of people to live and play at its inviting edges. From beaches to marshes to of time, the beginning eelgrass beds to shellfi sh reefs, our coasts and near shore seascapes and the end.” provide essential services. (continues on page 4) Rachel Carson in this issue Rising to the Challenge . 1 Early 2007 Milestones . 3 Friends in the Field . 8 From the Director . 2 A Tale of Two Seas . 6 Events and Field Trips. 10 New Trustees . 2 Beyond our Borders . 7 Awards . 12 From the Director Oceans contain 90% of Earth’s framework designed to restore Wayne Klockner life, yet scientists estimate that less and sustain the health, productiv- than 10% of that life has been ity and biodiversity of ecosystems. measured—a statistic once com- This process integrates economic, Taking pared to exploring land by dragging social and economic goals, recog- a butterfl y net behind an airplane. nizes people as key components of Conservation Our diverse coastal habitats act as ecosystems, works across political to the Sea biological engines for this vast net- boundaries, engages multiple work of life. Our salt marshes and stakeholders and incorporates the seagrass beds provide nutrients and dynamic interplay between nurseries that support the entire terrestrial, freshwater and marine marine food web; our shellfi sh reefs systems. are the cold-water equivalents of I believe that by taking this corals from a biodiversity perspec- holistic approach to the sea, we tive; and estuaries, where rivers can protect ocean and coastal meet the sea, support the most habitats in ways that benefi t marine productive waters we know. life, local communities and coastal Our Chapter’s Marine Program economies. Just as ocean species are has spent its fi rst year assessing the dynamic and wide-ranging, so must challenges to these vital ecosystems we be in our approach. With scien- and identifying important ways tists and staff in every state and 32 that conservation of tidelands (sub- countries developing and piloting ©Angela Ellis, TNC merged lands and tidal fl ats) differs innovative conservation tools in Wayne Klockner, Massachusetts State Director from the work we excel at on shore. their own communities, we are In Massachusetts all lands from ideally positioned to contribute to I keep a topographical map of the low tide mark seaward are held this vital effort. the Massachusetts coastline close in trust by the State for the pub- Oceans are downstream from at hand. I like maps, and this is a lic good; each of us has access to all of us—from the highest peaks good one. The detail reminds me these lands for fi shing, fowling and to the fl attest plains. I encourage that our coasts and the seabed navigation. One of many questions you to explore this new realm with beyond are contiguous with the ahead is how best to apply legal us. And remember, your support is land we walk every day. Our land- mechanisms for the conservation what makes this work possible—at scapes and seascapes were both of these tidelands—an end that is every scale and in every landscape. formed by the same glacial events surely in the public good. millennia ago. And while largely There are striking similarities out of view, the underwater terrain as well. As on land, The Nature is as varied and complex as the Conservancy’s approach to marine land itself, with diversity that tests conservation is guided by Eco- the bounds of imagination. system Based Management—a Chapter Welcomes Three Trustees to Board The Massachusetts Chapter is proud to announce he founded the Biodiversity Initiative, protected the addition of three well-regarded members of the 150,000 acres of open space and developed an scientifi c and business communities to its Board of environmental justice policy and global warming Trustees. These volunteer leaders are an integral part of strategy for the Commonwealth. Prior to that, the Chapter’s work, providing guidance and generating Bob served as Majority Whip in the State Senate support for our mission in Massachusetts and around and authored landmark environmental legislation the world. including The Rivers Protection Act, The Community Preservation Act and The Brownfi elds Act. Bob has Bob Durand is a cofounder of Durand & Anastas received countless awards for his environmental Environmental Strategies, Inc. a strategic planning achievements, and we look forward to his continued fi rm for projects subject to environmental review advocacy as a Board member. and permitting. Bob is the former Secretary of Environmental Affairs of Massachusetts and former Paul Elias is an investment manager and trustee Chair of the Water Resources Authority. As Secretary, in his role as Partner at J.M. Forbes & Co. He has a 2 Conservation Across the Commonwealth Spring 2007 Local Results Chapter Welcomes Three Trustees Early 2007 Milestones to Board Nature may take it easy in (continued from previous page) the winter, but the Massa- chusetts Chapter has been history of close collaboration as active as ever. Thanks to with the Conservancy, the generous support of our coordinating conservation donors and members, we can research and grassland already report some major restoration efforts on several of conservation achievements. the Elizabeth Islands. A special We wish to convey special interest of Paul’s is defi ning the thanks to Jane’s Trust, The goals of conservation in places, Kohlberg Foundation, like coastal New England, Lowe’s Educational and that have been subject to long Charitable Foundation, the histories of human activity, Sheehan Family Foundation, geological change and evolving Fields Pond Foundation and state Aquifer, a 199-square-mile under- climate. With graduate degrees Senators Therese Murray and Marc ground resource that nourishes in organismal biology from Pacheco for their leadership in seven rivers and supplies clean and U.C. Berkeley and Harvard helping us to reach these milestones: healthy drinking water to hundreds and professional experience in of thousands of area citizens. science publishing, Paul’s broad Partnered with the Massachusetts knowledge of conservation will Riverways Project to remove the Initiated the Martha’s Vineyard be a great asset as we identify Ballou Dam in Becket, Massachu- Prescribed Fire Partnership, a and implement effective land setts, helping to restore approxi- collaborative including The Nature stewardship strategies. mately 30 miles of river and Conservancy, The Trustees of stream continuity downstream Reservations, Sheriff’s Meadow Katharine Parsons is a on the Westfi eld River and eight Foundation, Polly Hill Arboretum senior scientist at Manomet miles of the Yokum Brook and its and Mass Audubon’s Felix Neck Center for Conservation tributaries, signifi cantly improving sanctuary, designed to share Science, where she serves as movement for Atlantic salmon and resources and apply safe and Director for the Wildlife and eastern brook trout. effective ecological fi re management. Wetlands program. After obtaining an A.B. in Biological Protected an additional 30 acres Inaugurated the Westfi eld Sciences from Smith College, at our Greene Swamp Preserve Highlands Forest Partnership, a her interest in avian ecology at Mt. Toby in Sunderland, coalition of community organiza- led her to Rutgers University, Massachusetts. The preserve is tions, landowners and other where she earned her Ph.D. in home to several types of forest, stakeholders working toward Ecology. Katharine has worked spring ephemerals, rare salamanders a shared vision: a healthy, free- extensively on issues affecting and turtles. fl owing Westfi eld River surrounded coastal and colonial waterbirds, by a connected network of forest and has been widely published Helped Manchester Essex reserves and sustainably-managed in that fi eld. Dr. Parsons was Conservation Trust preserve 100 working woodlands. drawn to The Nature Conser- acres of oak and pine woodland, vancy’s commitment to using wetlands and vernal pools in Essex, Helped launch the Taunton River scientifi c data to identify, Massachusetts. Watershed Study, which will help manage and protect essential local communities, state agencies habitat. The Board welcomes Re-launched the Plymouth and river and land use advocates her outstanding science back- Carver Aquifer Advisory determine how to manage additio- ground, critical reasoning and Committee, which is developing nal wastewater and storm water strong conservation ethic. a regional plan to manage the while sustaining river fl ow and Plymouth Carver Sole Source water supply. Conservation Across the Commonwealth Spring 2007 3 Marine Conservation Rising to the Challenge (continued from page 1) They are our principal ports of Franks Taylor, “must therefore ©Robb Johnson, TNC commerce, our fi rst lines of defense work across the entire watershed.” against storm systems and a key The Chapter’s advocacy for source of food and economic reducing nitrogen inputs into livelihood. And the oceans contain ponds and estuaries on Martha’s 90% of Earth’s life. Vineyard benefi ts marine vegetation The Massachusetts Chapter is working with “With so many functions, the and shellfi sh, and our efforts to partners to restore natural tidal fl ow to 1,100 acres pressures on our ocean resources restore and maintain fl ow in the of salt marsh along the Herring River in Wellfl eet. are intense,” says the Massachu- Westfi eld, Connecticut and Taunton setts Chapter’s Marine Program Rivers improves movement for strategy is the Chapter’s work Manager Rachael Franks Taylor. diadromous fi sh, like alewife and to restore the Herring River salt And with new proposals for Atlantic salmon, which travel marsh on Cape Cod.
Recommended publications
  • Ffy 2019 Annual Listing of Obligated Projects Per 23 Cfr 450.334
    FFY 2019 ANNUAL LISTING OF OBLIGATED PROJECTS PER 23 CFR 450.334 Agency ProjInfo_ID MassDOT _Project Description▼ Obligation FFY 2019 FFY 2019 Remaining Date Programmed Obligated Federal Advance Federal Fund Fund Construction Fund REGION : BERKSHIRE MassDOT 603255 PITTSFIELD- BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, P-10-049, LAKEWAY DRIVE OVER ONOTA 10-Jul-19 $2,919,968.00 $2,825,199.25 Highway LAKE MassDOT 606462 LENOX- RECONSTRUCTION & MINOR WIDENING ON WALKER STREET 15-Apr-19 $2,286,543.00 $2,037,608.80 Highway MassDOT 606890 ADAMS- NORTH ADAMS- ASHUWILLTICOOK RAIL TRAIL EXTENSION TO ROUTE 21-Aug-19 $800,000.00 $561,003.06 Highway 8A (HODGES CROSS ROAD) MassDOT 607760 PITTSFIELD- INTERSECTION & SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS AT 9 LOCATIONS ALONG 11-Sep-19 $3,476,402.00 $3,473,966.52 Highway SR 8 & SR 9 MassDOT 608243 NEW MARLBOROUGH- BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, N-08-010, UMPACHENE FALLS 25-Apr-19 $1,281,618.00 $1,428,691.48 Highway OVER KONKAPOT RIVER MassDOT 608263 SHEFFIELD- BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, S-10-019, BERKSHIRE SCHOOL ROAD OVER 20-Feb-19 $2,783,446.00 $3,180,560.93 Highway SCHENOB BROOK MassDOT 608351 ADAMS- CHESHIRE- LANESBOROUGH- RESURFACING ON THE 25-Jun-19 $4,261,208.00 $4,222,366.48 Highway ASHUWILLTICOOK RAIL TRAIL, FROM THE PITTSFIELD T.L. TO THE ADAMS VISITOR CENTER MassDOT 608523 PITTSFIELD- BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, P-10-042, NEW ROAD OVER WEST 17-Jun-19 $2,243,952.00 $2,196,767.54 Highway BRANCH OF THE HOUSATONIC RIVER BERKSHIRE REGION TOTAL : $20,053,137.00 $19,926,164.06 Wednesday, November 6, 2019 Page 1 of 20 FFY 2019 ANNUAL LISTING OF OBLIGATED PROJECTS PER
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Revisions to 314 CMR 4.00 (Tables and Figures, Clean)
    Please see the 314 CMR 4.00 Summary and Notice to Reviewers document, as well as the Fact Sheets on particular topics for additional information and explanatory detail associated with these proposed regulatory changes. These documents are available on the MassDEP Website. 314 CMR: DIVISION OF WATER POLLUTION CONTROL 4.06: continued LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES* TABLE & TABLE AND CORRESPONDING FIGURE TITLE Page # FIGURE # A (Figure only) River Basins and Coastal Drainage Areas TF-2 1 Blackstone River Basin TF-3 2 Boston Harbor Drainage Area (formerly Boston Harbor Drainage System and Mystic, Neponset and Weymouth & Weir River Basins) TF-8 3 Buzzards Bay Coastal Drainage Area TF-17 4 Cape Cod Coastal Drainage Area TF-22 5 Charles River Basin TF-30 6 Chicopee River Basin TF-34 7 Connecticut River Basin TF-40 8 Deerfield River Basin TF-49 9 Farmington River Basin TF-58 10 French River Basin TF-60 11 Housatonic River Basin TF-62 12 Hudson River Basin (formerly Hoosic, Kinderhook and Bashbish) TF-70 13 Ipswich River Basin TF-76 14 Islands Coastal Drainage Area (formerly Martha's Vineyard and Nantucket) TF-79 15 Merrimack River Basin TF-81 16 Millers River Basin TF-86 17 Narragansett Bay and Mount Hope Bay Drainage Area TF-90 18 Nashua River Basin TF-93 19 North Coastal Drainage Area TF-103 20 Parker River Basin TF-109 21 Quinebaug River Basin TF-113 22 Shawsheen River Basin TF-116 23 South Coastal Drainage Area TF-118 24 Sudbury, Assabet, and Concord (SuAsCo) River Basin (formerly Concord) TF-123 25 Taunton River Basin TF-128 26 Ten Mile River Basin TF-132 27 Westfield River Basin TF-134 28 (Table only) Site-Specific Criteria TF-144 29 (Table only) GenerallyApplicable Criteria: 29a.
    [Show full text]
  • WPA Form 3 - Instructions and Supporting Materials
    Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection – Wetlands & Waterways Notice of Intent BRP WPA Form 3 - Instructions and Supporting Materials Instructions for Completing Application WPA Form 3 – Notice of Intent NOTICE: As of 3/1/05, the Department of Environmental Protection has a new Simplified Review Procedure for projects involving only work in the Buffer Zone Please review 310 CMR 10.02(2)(b)(2) for project eligibility. Please read these instructions before completing the Notice of Intent application form (WPA Form 3). These instructions cover certain items on the Notice of Intent form that are not self-explanatory. Purpose of the Notice of Intent (NOI) To protect the Commonwealth's wetland resources, the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act (General Law Chapter 131, Section 40) prohibits the removal, dredging, filling, or altering of wetlands without a permit. To obtain a permit (called an Order of Conditions), a project proponent must submit an application to the Conservation Commission and the Department of Environmental Protection (the Department). The Notice of Intent application provides the Conservation Commission and the Department with a complete and accurate description of the: • Site: including the type and boundaries of resource areas under the Wetlands Protection Act, and • Proposed work: including all measures and designs proposed to meet the performance standards described in the Wetlands Protection Act Regulations, 310 Code of Massachusetts Regulations (CMR) 10.00, for each applicable resource area. The applicant is responsible for providing the information required for the review of this application to the permit issuing authority (Conservation Commission or the Department). The submittal of a complete and accurate description of the site and project will minimize requests for additional information by the issuing authority that may result in an unnecessary delay in the issuance of an Order of Conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Connecticut Watersheds
    Percent Impervious Surface Summaries for Watersheds CONNECTICUT WATERSHEDS Name Number Acres 1985 %IS 1990 %IS 1995 %IS 2002 %IS ABBEY BROOK 4204 4,927.62 2.32 2.64 2.76 3.02 ALLYN BROOK 4605 3,506.46 2.99 3.30 3.50 3.96 ANDRUS BROOK 6003 1,373.02 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.09 ANGUILLA BROOK 2101 7,891.33 3.13 3.50 3.78 4.29 ASH CREEK 7106 9,813.00 34.15 35.49 36.34 37.47 ASHAWAY RIVER 1003 3,283.88 3.89 4.17 4.41 4.96 ASPETUCK RIVER 7202 14,754.18 2.97 3.17 3.31 3.61 BALL POND BROOK 6402 4,850.50 3.98 4.67 4.87 5.10 BANTAM RIVER 6705 25,732.28 2.22 2.40 2.46 2.55 BARTLETT BROOK 3902 5,956.12 1.31 1.41 1.45 1.49 BASS BROOK 4401 6,659.35 19.10 20.97 21.72 22.77 BEACON HILL BROOK 6918 6,537.60 4.24 5.18 5.46 6.14 BEAVER BROOK 3802 5,008.24 1.13 1.22 1.24 1.27 BEAVER BROOK 3804 7,252.67 2.18 2.38 2.52 2.67 BEAVER BROOK 4803 5,343.77 0.88 0.93 0.94 0.95 BEAVER POND BROOK 6913 3,572.59 16.11 19.23 20.76 21.79 BELCHER BROOK 4601 5,305.22 6.74 8.05 8.39 9.36 BIGELOW BROOK 3203 18,734.99 1.40 1.46 1.51 1.54 BILLINGS BROOK 3605 3,790.12 1.33 1.48 1.51 1.56 BLACK HALL RIVER 4021 3,532.28 3.47 3.82 4.04 4.26 BLACKBERRY RIVER 6100 17,341.03 2.51 2.73 2.83 3.00 BLACKLEDGE RIVER 4707 16,680.11 2.82 3.02 3.16 3.34 BLACKWELL BROOK 3711 18,011.26 1.53 1.65 1.70 1.77 BLADENS RIVER 6919 6,874.43 4.70 5.57 5.79 6.32 BOG HOLLOW BROOK 6014 4,189.36 0.46 0.49 0.50 0.51 BOGGS POND BROOK 6602 4,184.91 7.22 7.78 8.41 8.89 BOOTH HILL BROOK 7104 3,257.81 8.54 9.36 10.02 10.55 BRANCH BROOK 6910 14,494.87 2.05 2.34 2.39 2.48 BRANFORD RIVER 5111 15,586.31 8.03 8.94 9.33 9.74
    [Show full text]
  • Schenob Brook
    Sages Ravine Brook Schenob BrookSchenob Brook Housatonic River Valley Brook Moore Brook Connecticut River North Canaan Watchaug Brook Scantic RiverScantic River Whiting River Doolittle Lake Brook Muddy Brook Quinebaug River Blackberry River Hartland East Branch Salmon Brook Somers Union Colebrook East Branch Salmon Brook Lebanon Brook Fivemile RiverRocky Brook Blackberry RiverBlackberry River English Neighborhood Brook Sandy BrookSandy Brook Muddy Brook Freshwater Brook Ellis Brook Spruce Swamp Creek Connecticut River Furnace Brook Freshwater Brook Furnace Brook Suffield Scantic RiverScantic River Roaring Brook Bigelow Brook Salisbury Housatonic River Scantic River Gulf Stream Bigelow Brook Norfolk East Branch Farmington RiverWest Branch Salmon Brook Enfield Stafford Muddy BrookMuddy Brook Factory Brook Hollenbeck River Abbey Brook Roaring Brook Woodstock Wangum Lake Brook Still River Granby Edson BrookEdson Brook Thompson Factory Brook Still River Stony Brook Stony Brook Stony Brook Crystal Lake Brook Wangum Lake Brook Middle RiverMiddle River Sucker BrookSalmon Creek Abbey Brook Salmon Creek Mad RiverMad River East Granby French RiverFrench River Hall Meadow Brook Willimantic River Barkhamsted Connecticut River Fenton River Mill Brook Salmon Creek West Branch Salmon Brook Connecticut River Still River Salmon BrookSalmon Brook Thompson Brook Still River Canaan Brown Brook Winchester Broad BrookBroad Brook Bigelow Brook Bungee Brook Little RiverLittle River Fivemile River West Branch Farmington River Windsor Locks Willimantic River First
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1 Areas of Critical Concern in Massachusetts
    NCCW GP Appendix 1 APPENDIX 1 Areas of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC) in Massachusetts If the project is proposed in one of the communities listed in the following pages, the project may be located in an Area of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC). Please refer to the Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR) website at http://www.mass.gov/eea/agencies/dcr/conservation/acec/ for more information and the most current listing of ACECs. To confirm whether the project is located in an ACEC, contact the community’s conservation commission OR the Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation ACEC program: Director of Ecology & ACEC Programs Department of Conservation & Recreation 251 Causeway St Boston, MA 02114 Current Director: Nancy Putnam E: [email protected] T: (617) 626-1394 Page 1 of 4 NCCW GP Appendix 1 MASSACHUSETTS AREAS OF CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN – November 2010 Total Approximate Acreage: 268,000 acres Bourne Back River (1,850 acres, 1989) Bourne Canoe River Aquifer and Associated Areas (17,200 acres, 1991) Easton, Foxborough, Mansfield, Norton, Sharon, and Taunton Cedar Swamp (1,650 acres, 1975) Hopkinton and Westborough Central Nashua River Valley (12,900 acres, 1996) Bolton, Harvard, Lancaster, and Leominster Cranberry Brook Watershed (1,050 acres, 1983) Braintree and Holbrook Ellisville Harbor (600 acres, 1980) Plymouth Fowl Meadow and Ponkapoag Bog (8,350 acres, 1992) Boston, Canton, Dedham, Milton, Norwood, Randolph, Sharon, and Westwood Golden Hills (500 acres, 1987) Melrose,
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. DEPARTMENT of the INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director For additional information, write to: U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Division 10 Bearfoot Road Northborough, MA 01532 2000 PREFACE This volume of the annual hydrologic data report of Massachusetts and Rhode Island is one of a series of annual reports that document hydrologic data gathered from the U.S Geological Survey’s surface- and ground-water data-collection networks in each State, Puerto Rico, and the Trust Territories. These records of streamflow, ground-water levels, and quality of water provide the hydrologic information needed by State, local, and Federal agencies, and the private sector for developing and managing our Nation’s land and water resources. Hydrologic data for Massachusetts and Rhode Island are contained in one volume. This report is the culmination of a concerted effort by dedicated personnel of the U.S. Geological Survey who collected, compiled, analyzed, verified, and organized the data, and who typed, edited, and assembled the report. In addition to the authors, who had primary responsibility for assuring that the information contained herein is accurate, complete, and adheres to Geological Survey policy and established guidelines, the following individuals contributed significantly to the collection, processing, and tabulation of the data: Kimberly W. Campo Britt O. Stock Linda Y. Comeau Joan S. Whitley Charles R. Leighton Joseph F. Whitley Domenic Murino, Jr. Joseph L. Zanca Anne M. Weaver was responsible for the word processing and publishing phases of the report and Mark V. Bonito prepared the illustrations. Jason R.
    [Show full text]
  • The River and Its Valley, Conserving Biodiversity In
    River and Its Valley Conserving Biodiversity in the Housatonic River Watershed of Western Massachusetts Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Fish & Game I Division of Fisheries & Wildlife I Notuml Hentage & Endangered Species Program 2011 The River and Its VaHey The Housatonic River watershed is highly valued for its native biodh"ersity. distinct habitats, and natural beauty. A remarkably high number of state-listed plants and animals (112) occur in low elevations of rhe HOllsamnic Rive r watershed. Only 15 percent of the land area in the watershed that is below 1,000 feet in elevation is protected; therefore, land protection in this aTea is a high priority for the Commonwealth of Massachuset[S and irs conservation partners. Consen"ation partners are encouraged {Q use (h is report and associated documents to help establish priorities for habitat protectio n, restoratio n, and manage illenc The RIVer end 11$ Volley; ,, Introduction There is something special about the Housatonic River protected , yet these areas include habitats for 112 species watershed in western Massachuse[[s, with irs broad river of state-listed plants and animals, as well as some of the va ll ey and the backdrop of the Berkshire Hills and Tacon­ state's least common natural communities, such as calcar­ ic Mountains. The forests, rich soils, and waterways of the eous fens. In contrast, 61 percent of lands in the water­ watershed helped shape the remarkable natural diversiry shed higher than 2,500 fee t in elevation are protected, but and special character of the region, as well as influence only 25 species of state-listed plants and animals inhabit how humans senled and used the land.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix J. Table of Historical Ice Jam Events
    APPENDIX J. TABLE OF HISTORICAL ICE JAM EVENTS The CRREL database was queried for all ice jam events that occurred in Massachusetts from 1913 through 2012. Based on review of the CRREL database, 226 ice jam events have occurred in the Commonwealth, between 1913 and 2010. These events are listed in Table J-1. Information regarding losses associated with these reported ice jams was limited. No events have occurred since 2010, and the data is current as of the 2013 update. TABLE J-1. ICE JAM EVENTS IN MASSACHUSETTS BETWEEN 1913 AND 2012 River / Event Date Location County Losses Event Write-Up February 28, 1913 Middle Branch Hampshire N/A No reference and/or no damage reported. Westfield River March 2, 1914 Ware River Worcester N/A No reference and/or no damage reported. January 7, 1915 Quaboag River Hampden N/A No reference and/or no damage reported. February 26, 1916 Middle Branch Hampshire N/A No reference and/or no damage reported. Westfield River February 26, 1916 West Branch Berkshire/ N/A No reference and/or no damage reported. Farmington River Hampden January 14, 1917 West Branch Middlesex N/A No reference and/or no damage reported. Farmington River February 28, 1917 Ware River Worcester N/A No reference and/or no damage reported. February 20, 1918 West Branch Berkshire/ N/A No reference and/or no damage reported. Farmington River Hampden March 21, 1918 Deerfield River N/A No reference and/or no damage reported. March 14, 1920 Middle Branch Hampshire N/A No reference and/or no damage reported.
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-Construction Notification January 30, 2017 Volume II: Appendix D Through Appendix G
    Killingly Energy Center – Pre-Construction Notification January 30, 2017 Volume II: Appendix D through Appendix G Attachments Volume I Figures Figure 1: KEC Location Figure 2: KEC Site Plan Figure 3: Delineated Wetlands and Flood Zones Figure 4: FEMA Flood Map Figure 5: Unavoidable and Minimized Wetland Impact Associated with the Utility Switchyard and Lake Road Adjustment A: Applications for Department of Army Application for Department of the Army Permit (ENG Form 4345) DEEP Connecticut Addendum Form (DEP-ACGP-APP-001) B: Wetland and Stream Delineation, Inventory, Characterization & Evaluation B-1: Wetland Report: Existing Conditions B-2: Wetland Report: Proposed Conditions B-3: Area of Impact Forms B-4: Wetland Report: Existing Conditions Along Lake Road C: Stormwater Management C-1: Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan C-2: Lake Road Alteration Volume II D: Biological Field Surveys and Agency Correspondence D-1: Northern Long-eared Bat (NLEB) Presence/Absence Survey D-2: Ecological Assessment Report D-3: Invertebrate Survey D-4: USFWS Species Correspondence D-5: DEEP Species Correspondence E: Archaeological and Cultural Agency Correspondence E-1: SHPO Archaeological and Cultural Correspondence E-2: THPO Archaeological and Cultural Correspondence F: Wetland Mitigation Report G: Invasive Species Control Plan January 30, 2017 Killingly Energy Center U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Attachment D: Biological Field Surveys and Species Correspondence D-1: Northern Long-eared Bat (NLEB) Presence/Absence Survey D-2: Ecological Assessment Report D-3: Invertebrate Survey D-4: USFWS Species Correspondence D-5: DEEP Species Correspondence January 30, 2017 Killingly Energy Center U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Attachment D-1: NLEB Presence/Absence Survey August 12, 2016 Susi von Oettingen USFWS New England Field Office 70 Commercial Street, Suite 30 Concord, NH 03301 Project NTE Connecticut, LLC Killingly Energy Center Northern Long-eared Bat (NLEB) Presence/Absence Survey Town Killingly, Connecticut Surveyor Name/Firm Clinton Parrish/Tetra Tech, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Mass Audubon's
    Places to Explore A Guide to Mass Audubon’s Wildlife Sanctuaries, Nature Centers, and Museums Table of Contents Introduction 1 Map of Wildlife Sanctuaries, Nature Centers, and Museums 8 Icon Key 10 Greater Boston 11 Central Massachusetts 46 Blue Hills Trailside Museum, Milton 12 Broad Meadow Brook, Worcester 47 Boston Nature Center, Mattapan 13 Burncoat Pond, Spencer 48 Broadmoor, Natick 14 Cook’s Canyon, Barre 49 Drumlin Farm, Lincoln 15 Eagle Lake, Holden 50 Habitat Education Center, Belmont 16 Flat Rock, Fitchburg 51 Moose Hill, Sharon 17 Lake Wampanoag, Gardner 52 Museum of American Bird Art, Canton 18 Lincoln Woods, Leominster 53 Stony Brook, Norfolk 19 Nashoba Brook, Westford 54 Waseeka, Hopkinton 20 Pierpont Meadow, Dudley 55 Poor Farm Hill, New Salem 56 North Shore 21 Rocky Hill, Groton 57 Eastern Point, Gloucester 22 Rutland Brook, Petersham 58 Endicott, Wenham 23 Wachusett Meadow, Princeton 59 Ipswich River, Topsfield 24 Joppa Flats Education Center, Connecticut Newburyport 25 60 River Valley Marblehead Neck, Marblehead 26 Arcadia, Easthampton Nahant Thicket, Nahant 27 & Northampton 61 Rough Meadows, Rowley 28 Conway Hills, Conway 62 Graves Farm, Williamsburg South of Boston 29 & Whately 63 Allens Pond, Dartmouth & Westport 30 High Ledges, Shelburne 64 Attleboro Springs, Attleboro 31 Laughing Brook, Hampden 65 Daniel Webster, Marshfield 32 Lynes Woods, Westhampton 66 Great Neck, Wareham 33 Richardson Brook, Tolland 67 North Hill Marsh, Duxbury 34 Road’s End, Worthington 68 North River, Marshfield 35 West Mountain, Plainfield
    [Show full text]
  • FFY 2019 – 2023 TIP Development
    Berkshire County Metropolitan Planning Organization Route 8 – Adams Skyline Trail – Hinsdale BMC Area Improvements – Pittsfield East Street – Pittsfield HighwaySafetyAnalysisTransitBridgeBe rkshirewertyuiopasdfghjklzeMPO CMAQuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqHSIPioSTTransportation Improvement Program PHPPklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopaSTPENHS October 1, 2018 – September 30, 2023 mqcwertyuiopasdfghjklzxBRNFA5307i opasdfghjklzxcvbnmPede5309sBikeCap acityImprovementsReconstructionReha bilitationResurfacingIntersectionsUpgr adeProgrammedDrainageWideningRest orationRepavingPedestriansFederalFun dingStateLocalRegionalTownsCityCom munitiesProjectPlanningImprovements Berkshire Regional Planning Commission 1 Fenn Street, Suite 201, Pittsfield, MA - 01201 mqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyui opasdfghjklzxcvbnmrtyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxc BERKSHIRE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION BERKSHIRE REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION 1 FENN STREET, SUITE 201, PITTSFIELD, MASSACHUSETTS 01201 TELEPHONE (413) 442-1521 · FAX (413) 442-1523 www.berkshireplanning.org TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR THE BERKSHIRE REGION OCTOBER 1, 2018 - SEPTEMBER 30, 2023 This report was prepared by the Berkshire Regional Planning Commission, in cooperation with the Berkshire Regional Transit Authority, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Transportation, and the U.S. Department of Transportation - Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration. THIS PAGE IS LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY Berkshire Metropolitan Planning Organization:
    [Show full text]