Einstein for the 21St Century

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Einstein for the 21St Century Einstein for the 21st Century Einstein for the 21st Century HIS LEGACY IN SCIENCE, ART, AND MODERN CULTURE Peter L. Galison, Gerald Holton, and Silvan S. Schweber, Editors princeton university press | princeton and oxford Copyright © 2008 by Princeton University Press Published by Princeton University Press, 41 William Street, Princeton, New Jersey 08540 In the United Kingdom: Princeton University Press, 6 Oxford Street, Woodstock, Oxfordshire OX20 1TW All Rights Reserved Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Einstein for the twenty-first century: His legacy in science, art, and modern culture / Peter L. Galison, Gerald Holton, and Silvan S. Schweber, editors. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-691-13520-5 (hardcover : acid-free paper) 1. Einstein, Albert, 1879–1955—Influence. I. Galison, Peter Louis. II. Holton, Gerald James. III. Schweber, S. S. (Silvan S.) IV. Title: Einstein for the 21st century. QC16.E5E446 2008 530.092—dc22 2007034853 British Library Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available This book has been composed in Aldus and Trajan Printed on acid-free paper. ∞ press.princeton.edu Printed in the United States of America 13579108642 Contents Introduction ix part 1 Solitude and World 1 Who Was Einstein? Why Is He Still So Alive? 3 Gerald Holton 2 A Short History of Einstein’s Paradise beyond the Personal 15 Lorraine Daston 3 Einstein’s Jewish Identity 27 Hanoch Gutfreund 4 Einstein and God 35 Yehuda Elkana 5 Einstein’s Unintended Legacy: The Critique of Common-Sense Realism and Post-Modern Politics 48 Yaron Ezrahi 6 Subversive Einstein 59 Susan Neiman 7 Einstein and Nuclear Weapons 72 Silvan S. Schweber part 2 Art and World 8 Einstein and 20th-Century Art: A Romance of Many Dimensions 101 Linda Dalrymple Henderson 9 Rendering Time 130 Caroline A. Jones 10 Into the Bleed: Einstein and 21st-Century Art 150 Matthew Ritchie 11 Einstein and Music 161 Leon Botstein 12 Seeing the Unseen 176 E. L. Doctorow part 3 Science and World 13 The Assassin of Relativity 185 Peter L. Galison 14 Space, Time, and Geometry: Einstein and Logical Empiricism 205 Michael L. Friedman 15 Einstein as a Student 217 Dudley Herschbach 16 Learning from Einstein: Innovation in Science 239 Jürgen Renn 17 Einstein and ¯h : Advances in Quantum Mechanics 257 Jürg Fröhlich 18 Einstein’s Unknown Contribution to Quantum Theory 270 A. Douglas Stone 19 Einstein and the Quest for a Unified Theory 287 David Gross 20 Energy in Einstein’s Universe 299 Lisa Randall Notes 311 Contributors 341 Index 349 Introduction Peter L. Galison, Gerald Holton, and Silvan S. Schweber Among the many thousands of Albert Einstein’s letters, very few show him to be really angry. However, a rather fierce one was directed at the publisher of one of his books who had had the temerity to give that volume the title Mein Weltbild. That choice, Einstein wrote, was “tasteless and misleading,” for the book (later available in English as Ideas and Opinions) was only a collection of some of his separate essays on a variety of topics, ranging from science to pol- itics and pacifism. What Einstein had called elsewhere “the proud term Welt- bild” was the essential determinant and goal of one’s intellectual life and character, a deeply held commitment into which, as he put it, “one could place the very center of gravity of one’s emotional life”—thus providing a coherent conception that would explain “every natural process, including life itself.” The book before you, which had its origin in lectures presented at the Berlin Einstein Symposium of 2005, is a unique attempt along two lines: the “inputs” to and “outputs” from Einstein’s worldview. The first line of inquiry garners, from the results of decades of scholarly research across a wide spec- trum of fields, the variety of main elements that, in the cauldron of Einstein’s inner sanctum, formed his unified view of the world. These inputs included, by his own account, his study of the work of scientists from Newton, Faraday, Maxwell, Lorentz to Boltzmann, Planck, and other contemporaries; of philosophers—he referred to Spinoza, Hume, Kant, Schopenhauer, Mach, among others; of literature and music—his love for Goethe, Heine, Bach, Mozart; and of social and political affairs that touched his humanity. The other kind of presentations in these chapters deals with outputs, the effects streaming from Einstein’s work and persona, from his Weltbild, into the active life of his contemporaries and ours. More than any scientist since Newton and Darwin, Einstein has continued to inspire others to draw on his legacies, again across a wide variety of fields: scientists of course, from Minkowski, von Laue, Schrödinger, Born, to some of today’s most distin- guished researchers; philosophers and theologians; writers and visual artists; and the whole range of people, from humble individuals to statesmen, touched by Einstein’s beliefs and action in social and political affairs. One may well say that Einstein’s continuing influences on our culture are of a quality and quantity not less than those on which he himself drew. Part I: Solitude and World Our guiding question for this volume is this: How is it that Einstein, a physicist of the early 20th century, remains such a figure of fascination for so many fields of work, from the sciences to the humanities? Gerald Holton’s essay opens our volume with some reflections on how Einstein saw himself at that world histor- ical moment just after the Nazis came to power: “A man, a good European, a Jew.” And as Holton swiftly adds, a scientist—these four overlapping identities return in many of the chapters that follow. As a man, Einstein saw himself as singularly isolated, never quite able, at least in his later, world-famous life, to form the human bonds he saw linking others. Perhaps that separateness, that life apart, speaks to others’ fears and romantic wishes. As a good European, he both absorbed deep currents of central European culture and furiously resisted being enlisted to nationalistic strivings. He maintained that internationalism even un- der the enormous pressure of two world wars and a cold one. Later in life he found a cultural significance in Judaism, always resisting both too literal a God or too exclusivist a national striving within Zionism. To the rest of us, Einstein became a magnet by his constant battle to navigate alone while absorbing so much from—and giving back so much to—the broader world. Lorraine Daston takes up Holton’s first announced identity: Einstein’s search for a “paradise beyond the personal.” This life-long quest for relief from the “merely personal” was, for Einstein, surely in part a psychological liberation. It was also a feature of his science and his philosophy. Schopen- hauer, one of Einstein’s favorite philosophers, emphasized over and over how important it was for true knowledge to be had through a kind of will to will- lessness, a removal of the individual’s wants. Einstein’s own physics bore the mark of this desire to find an objective world not dependent on us, neither our particular perspective (frame of reference), nor more broadly still, our con- sciousness or measurement decisions. These struggles over objectivity in quantum mechanics, and in the broader world, are with us still. By contrast, Gutfreund, Elkana, and Ezrahi reveal Einstein’s striking sub- jectivity, as in his relationship with what he called his “tribe,” in his need to speak out on the social and intellectual issues of the day, and in the influence introduction x his work and that of other 20th-century scientists have had on democratic institutions. Thus Hanoch Gutfreund traces, in terms of roots and conse- quences, Einstein’s “discovery” of being a Jew outside doctrinal orthodoxies. As in most of his other attitudes, Einstein again surprises us by his idiosyn- cratic responses, both in his analysis of the causes of rampant anti-Semitism and in his growing attachment to a special version of Zionism. On that last point, Isaiah Berlin once wrote with admiration about the fact that “Einstein lent the prestige mondial of his great name, and in fact gave his heart, to the movement which created the state of Israel.” Yehuda Elkana, drawing also on the treasure trove of Einstein’s correspon- dence and nonscientific publications, daringly entitled his essay simply Ein- stein and God. He presents, with commentary, a coherent series of Einstein’s own public remarks that document his life-long struggle to sense the tran- scendental, beckoning to him from beyond mere natural phenomena. As in some other respects, on this task, too, Einstein and Newton agreed. When Niels Bohr once famously asked Einstein to stop referring so often in the same breath to science and to God, Bohr simply revealed one of the many deep-seated thematic differences between those two great scientists. But on at least one other topic, the major scientists largely agreed. Yaron Ezrahi takes up that topic in his challenging essay on Einstein’s Unintended Legacy: the changing relevance of modern science for the culture and epistemo- logical framework of democratic politics. His analysis begins with reference to the “Newtonian moment” characterizing earlier centuries, when the authority of a largely independent, consensual polity could be said to rest in good part on the concept that authority, both in society as well as in the understanding of na- ture itself, rested “not on hypotheses but on evidence”—on the widely accessi- ble evidence considered to operate within the frame of commonsense realism. Hence one could argue, as politicians of the time did, for a mutually rein- forcing bond between the laws and worldview of their science and those of their democratic society.
Recommended publications
  • Anthropic Measure of Hominid (And Other) Terrestrials. Brandon Carter Luth, Observatoire De Paris-Meudon
    Anthropic measure of hominid (and other) terrestrials. Brandon Carter LuTh, Observatoire de Paris-Meudon. Provisional draft, April 2011. Abstract. According to the (weak) anthropic principle, the a priori proba- bility per unit time of finding oneself to be a member of a particular popu- lation is proportional to the number of individuals in that population, mul- tiplied by an anthropic quotient that is normalised to unity in the ordinary (average adult) human case. This quotient might exceed unity for conceiv- able superhuman extraterrestrials, but it should presumably be smaller for our terrestrial anthropoid relations, such as chimpanzees now and our pre- Neanderthal ancestors in the past. The (ethically relevant) question of how much smaller can be addressed by invoking the anthropic finitude argument, using Bayesian reasonning, whereby it is implausible a posteriori that the total anthropic measure should greatly exceed the measure of the privileged subset to which we happen to belong, as members of a global civilisation that has (recently) entered a climactic phase with a timescale of demographic expansion and technical development short compared with a breeding gen- eration. As well as “economist’s dream” scenarios with continual growth, this finitude argument also excludes “ecologist’s dream” scenarios with long term stabilisation at some permanently sustainable level, but it it does not imply the inevitability of a sudden “doomsday” cut-off. A less catastrophic likelihood is for the population to decline gradually, after passing smoothly through a peak value that is accounted for here as roughly the information content ≈ 1010 of our genome. The finitude requirement limits not just the future but also the past, of which the most recent phase – characterised by memetic rather than genetic evolution – obeyed the Foerster law of hyperbolic population growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Oral History Interview with Nicholas Krushenick, 1968 Mar. 7-14
    Oral history interview with Nicholas Krushenick, 1968 Mar. 7-14 Contact Information Reference Department Archives of American Art Smithsonian Institution Washington. D.C. 20560 www.aaa.si.edu/askus Transcript Preface The following oral history transcript is the result of a tape-recorded interview with Nicholas Krushenick on March 7, 1968. The interview was conducted in New York by Paul Cummings for the Archives of American Art, Smithsonian Institution. Interview PAUL CUMMINGS: This is March 7, 1968. Paul Cummings talking to Nicholas Krushenick. You’re a rare born New Yorker? NICHOLAS KRUSHENICK: Yes. One of the last. PAUL CUMMINGS: Let’s see, May 31, 1929. NICHOLAS KRUSHENICK: Very Young. PAUL CUMMINGS: That’s the year to do it. NICHOLAS KRUSHENICK: That’s the year of the zero, the crash. PAUL CUMMINGS: Well, why don’t you tell me something about your family, what part of New York you were born in. NICHOLAS KRUSHENICK: I was born up in the Bronx in a quiet little residential neighborhood. Luckily enough my father actually brought me into the world. The doctor didn’t get there soon enough and my father did the operation himself; he ties the knot and the whole thing. When the doctor got there he said it was a beautiful job. And I went to various public schools in the Bronx. PAUL CUMMINGS: You have what? –one brother? More brothers? Any sisters? NICHOLAS KRUSHENICK: Just one brother. PAUL CUMMINGS: What did you live in – a house? Or an apartment? NICHOLAS KRUSHENICK: No. Actually it was the Depression days. And we were the superintendents of a building.
    [Show full text]
  • Editorial Note To: Brandon Carter, Large Number Coincidences and the Anthropic Principle in Cosmology
    Gen Relativ Gravit (2011) 43:3213–3223 DOI 10.1007/s10714-011-1257-8 GOLDEN OLDIE EDITORIAL Editorial note to: Brandon Carter, Large number coincidences and the anthropic principle in cosmology George F. R. Ellis Published online: 27 September 2011 © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011 Keywords Cosmology · Confrontation of cosmological theories with observational data · Anthropic principle · World ensemble · Golden Oldie Editorial The anthropic principle is one of the most controversial proposals in cosmology. It relates to why the universe is of such a nature as to allow the existence of life. This inevitably engages with the foundations of cosmology, and has philosophical as well as technical aspects. The literature on the topic is vast—the Carter paper reprinted here [10] has 226 listed citations, and the Barrow and Tipler book [3] has 1,740. Obviously I can only pick up on a few of these papers in this brief review of the impact of the paper. While there were numerous previous philosophical treatises on the topic, stretching back to speculations about the origin of the universe in ancient times (see [3]fora magisterial survey), scientific studies are more recent. A well known early one was by biologist Alfred Russell Wallace, who wrote in 1904: “Such a vast and complex uni- verse as that which we know exists around us, may have been absolutely required … in order to produce a world that should be precisely adapted in every detail for the orderly development of life culminating in man” [50]. But that was before modern cosmology was established: the idea of the expanding and evolving universe was yet to come.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 201720172017
    2017 2017 2017 2017 Fall Fall Fall Fall This content downloaded from 024.136.113.202 on December 13, 2017 10:53:41 AM All use subject to University of Chicago Press Terms and Conditions (http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/t-and-c). American Art SummerFall 2017 2017 • 31/3 • 31/2 University of Chicago Press $20 $20 $20 $20 USA USA USA USA 1073-9300(201723)31:3;1-T 1073-9300(201723)31:3;1-T 1073-9300(201723)31:3;1-T 1073-9300(201723)31:3;1-T reform reform reform reform cameras cameras cameras cameras “prints” “prints” “prints” “prints” and and and and memory memory memory memory playground playground playground playground of of of Kent’s of Kent’s Kent’s Kent’s guns, guns, guns, guns, abolitionism abolitionism abolitionism abolitionism art art art art and and and and the the the the Rockwell literary Rockwell Rockwell literary literary Rockwell issue literary issue issue issue Group, and Group, and Group, and Group, and in in in in this this this this Homer—dogs, Homer—dogs, Homer—dogs, Place Homer—dogs, Place Place Place In In In In nostalgia Park nostalgia nostalgia Park Park nostalgia Park Duncanson’s Duncanson’s Duncanson’s Duncanson’s Christenberry the Christenberry S. Christenberry the S. the S. Christenberry the S. Winslow Winslow Winslow Winslow with with with with Robert Robert Robert Robert Suvero, Suvero, Suvero, Suvero, William William William William di di di Technological di Technological Technological Technological Hunting Hunting Hunting Hunting Mark Mark Mark Mark Kinetics of Liberation in Mark di Suvero’s Play Sculpture Melissa Ragain Let’s begin with a typical comparison of a wood construction by Mark di Suvero with one of Tony Smith’s solitary cubes (fgs.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report to Industry Canada Covering The
    Annual Report to Industry Canada Covering the Objectives, Activities and Finances for the period August 1, 2008 to July 31, 2009 and Statement of Objectives for Next Year and the Future Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics 31 Caroline Street North Waterloo, Ontario N2L 2Y5 Table of Contents Pages Period A. August 1, 2008 to July 31, 2009 Objectives, Activities and Finances 2-52 Statement of Objectives, Introduction Objectives 1-12 with Related Activities and Achievements Financial Statements, Expenditures, Criteria and Investment Strategy Period B. August 1, 2009 and Beyond Statement of Objectives for Next Year and Future 53-54 1 Statement of Objectives Introduction In 2008-9, the Institute achieved many important objectives of its mandate, which is to advance pure research in specific areas of theoretical physics, and to provide high quality outreach programs that educate and inspire the Canadian public, particularly young people, about the importance of basic research, discovery and innovation. Full details are provided in the body of the report below, but it is worth highlighting several major milestones. These include: In October 2008, Prof. Neil Turok officially became Director of Perimeter Institute. Dr. Turok brings outstanding credentials both as a scientist and as a visionary leader, with the ability and ambition to position PI among the best theoretical physics research institutes in the world. Throughout the last year, Perimeter Institute‘s growing reputation and targeted recruitment activities led to an increased number of scientific visitors, and rapid growth of its research community. Chart 1. Growth of PI scientific staff and associated researchers since inception, 2001-2009.
    [Show full text]
  • PEN (Organization)
    PEN (Organization): An Inventory of Its Records at the Harry Ransom Center Descriptive Summary Creator: PEN (Organization) Title: PEN (Organization) Records Dates: 1912-2008 (bulk 1926-1997) Extent: 352 document boxes, 5 card boxes (cb), 5 oversize boxes (osb) (153.29 linear feet), 4 oversize folders (osf) Abstract: The records of the London-based writers' organizations English PEN and PEN International, founded by Catharine Amy Dawson Scott in 1921, contain extensive correspondence with writer-members and other PEN centres around the world. Their records document campaigns, international congresses and other meetings, committees, finances, lectures and other programs, literary prizes awarded, membership, publications, and social events over several decades. Call Number: Manuscript Collection MS-03133 Language: The records are primarily written in English with sizeable amounts in French, German, and Spanish, and lesser amounts in numerous other languages. Non-English items are sometimes accompanied by translations. Note: The Ransom Center gratefully acknowledges the assistance of the National Endowment for the Humanities, which provided funds for the preservation, cataloging, and selective digitization of this collection. The PEN Digital Collection contains 3,500 images of newsletters, minutes, reports, scrapbooks, and ephemera selected from the PEN Records. An additional 900 images selected from the PEN Records and related Ransom Center collections now form five PEN Teaching Guides that highlight PEN's interactions with major political and historical trends across the twentieth century, exploring the organization's negotiation with questions surrounding free speech, political displacement, and human rights, and with global conflicts like World War II and the Cold War. Access: Open for research. Researchers must create an online Research Account and agree to the Materials Use Policy before using archival materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert Morris, Minimalism, and the 1960S
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 1988 The Politics of Experience: Robert Morris, Minimalism, and the 1960s Maurice Berger Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/1646 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] INFORMATION TO USERS The most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this manuscript from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book.
    [Show full text]
  • A Quasicrystal for Cherry Valley-1
    The Visual and Structural Properties of Quasicrystals Key words: Quasicrystal Sculpture, Quasicrystal Architecture, Stability A Quasicrystal for Cherry Valley A visually rich and complex quasicrystal sculpture is quickly assembled with relatively few standard parts of only three types. Quasicrystals fill space with a non-repeating pattern; parts repeat, but not at regular intervals. In two dimensions, the pattern might be a Penrose tessellation, although other similar patterns could also be in this category. In three dimensions, the units are two skewed cubes, and in a lattice structure these can be made with rods and dodecahedral nodes. All the rods are of the same length; all the nodes are the same and in the same orientation; all the faces of the lattice are the same rhomb, and can be filled with identical plates. For the Cherry Valley Sculpture Exhibition of 2012, I made a quasicrystal sphere. It has a triacontahedral hull – a 30 sided figure that derives from the fusion of a regular dodecahedron and a regular icosahedron. Nested inside my hull is a rhombic icosahedron and nested inside that is a rhombic dodecahedron. Even though all the parts are standard, the sculpture has 2-fold symmetry (of squares), 3-fold symmetry (of triangles and hexagons), and 5-fold symmetry (of star pentagons), depending on the location of the viewer. This wonderful complexity of aspect is also apparent in the shadows that the sculpture casts. Structural considerations As an artist, I am primarily concerned with the visual properties of quasicrystals; for a wider application to architecture, however, the structural and rigidity properties of these structures must be understood.
    [Show full text]
  • Reframing Generated Rhythms and the Metric Matrix As Projections of Higher-Dimensional LaIces in Sco Joplin’S Music *
    Reframing Generated Rhythms and the Metric Matrix as Projections of Higher-Dimensional Laices in Sco Joplin’s Music * Joshua W. Hahn NOTE: The examples for the (text-only) PDF version of this item are available online at: hps://www.mtosmt.org/issues/mto.21.27.2/mto.21.27.2.hahn.php KEYWORDS: meter, rhythm, beat class theory, syncopation, ragtime, poetry, hyperspace, Joplin, Du Bois ABSTRACT: Generated rhythms and the metric matrix can both be modelled by time-domain equivalents to projections of higher-dimensional laices. Sco Joplin’s music is a case study for how these structures can illuminate both musical and philosophical aims. Musically, laice projections show how Joplin creates a sense of multiple beat streams unfolding at once. Philosophically, these structures sonically reinforce a Du Boisian approach to understanding Joplin’s work. Received August 2019 Volume 27, Number 2, June 2021 Copyright © 2021 Society for Music Theory Introduction [1] “Dr. Du Bois, I’ve read and reread your Souls of Black Folk,” writes Julius Monroe Troer, the protagonist of Tyehimba Jess’s 2017 Pulier Prize-winning work of poetry, Olio. “And with this small bundle of voices I hope to repay the debt and become, in some small sense, a fellow traveler along your course” (Jess 2016, 11). Jess’s Julius Monroe Troer is a fictional character inspired by James Monroe Troer (1842–1892), a Black historian who catalogued Black musical accomplishments.(1) In Jess’s narrative, Troer writes to W. E. B. Du Bois to persuade him to help publish composer Sco Joplin’s life story.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report for the Fiscal Year July 1, 1980
    The Institute for Advanced Study .nnual Report 1980 This Annual Report has been made possible by a generous grant from the Union Carbide Corporation. ! The Institute for Advanced Study Annual Report for the Fiscal Year July 1, 1980-June 30, 1981 The Institute for Advanced Study Olden Lane Princeton, New Jersey 08540 U.S.A. Printed by Princeton University Press Designed by Bruce Campbell x4S36 /98I It is fundamental to our purpose, and our Extract from the letter addressed by the express desire, that in the appointments to Founders to the Institute's Trustees, the staff and faculty, as well as in the dated June 6, 1930, Newark, New Jersey. admission of workers and students, no account shall be taken, directly or indirectly, of race, religion or sex. We feel strongly that the spirit characteristic of America at its noblest, above all, the pursuit of higher learning, cannot admit of any conditions as to personnel other than those designed to promote the objects for which this institution is established, and particularly with no regard whatever to accidents of race, creed or sex. /r2- S39 Table of Contents Trustees and Officers Founders Caroline Bamberger Fuld Louis Bamberger Board of Trustees Daniel Bell Howard C. Kauffmann Professor of Sociology President Harvard University Exxon Corporation Charles L. Brown John R. Opel Chairman the Board of and Chief President and Chief Executive Officer Executive Officer IBM Corporation American Telephone and Telegraph Company Howard C. Petersen Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Fletcher L. Byrom Chairman of the Board Martin E. Segal Koppers Company, Inc. Partner, Wertheim & Co.; Chairman, Martin E.
    [Show full text]
  • (Lot of 6) 1966 Chateau Petit-Village Pomerol, Each 750Ml $ 300 - 500 2001 (Lot of 5) 1966 Chateau Petit-Village Pomerol, Each 750Ml $ 300 - 500
    LOW HIGH Lot Description Estimate Estimate 2000 (lot of 6) 1966 Chateau Petit-Village Pomerol, each 750ml $ 300 - 500 2001 (lot of 5) 1966 Chateau Petit-Village Pomerol, each 750ml $ 300 - 500 2002 (lot of 3) French wine group, consisting of a 1970 Domaine Dujac Bonnes-Mares; and (2) 1969 Louis Latour Savigny-les-Beaune Cote de Beaune, each 750ml $ 400 - 600 (lot of 3) French wine group, consisting of a 1959 Chateau Rauzan-Gassies, Margaux; a 2003 1967 Armand Roux Bonnes-Mares; and a 1970 Maison Albert Brenot Bourgogne, each 750ml $ 500 - 700 (lot of 8) French wine group, consisting of a 1967 and (7) 1969 Chateau de la Gardine 2004 Chateauneuf-du-Pape, Rhone, each 750ml $ 400 - 600 (lot of 7) French wine group, consisting of a 1967 and (6) 1969 Chateau de la Gardine 2005 Chateauneuf-du-Pape, Rhone, each 750ml $ 400 - 600 2006 (lot of 15) 1964 Chateau de la Tour Clos-Vougeot, each 750 ml $ 300 - 500 2007 (lot of 18) 1964 Chateau de la Tour Clos-Vougeot, each 750 ml $ 300 - 500 1996 Domaine Drouhin Pinot Noir, Laurène, Oregon, 1.5l. Provenance: From the Ligonier, 2008 PA estate of Richard Mellon Scaife $ 100 - 200 (lot of 17) French, German and California wine group, consisting of (9) NV Tattinger Brut La Francaise; (4) 1969 Robert Mondavi; (3) 1966 Kesselstatt Josephshofer Riesling 2009 Spatlese; 1966 Chateau Moncontour Vouvray Demi-Sec; and a 1971 Grunhauser, each 750ml $ 300 - 500 2010 (lot of 6) 1964 Chateau Bellegrave Gran Vin, Pauillac, each 750ml $ 600 - 900 (lot of 8) French wine group consisting of a 1962 and (7) 1964 Chateau Bellegrave Gran 2011 Vin, Pauillac, each 750ml $ 500 - 700 (lot of 6) French wine group consisting of (2) 1966 Chateau Beychevelle Grand Vin, Saint- 2012 Julien; and (4) 1971 Tytell Europa St.
    [Show full text]
  • Publisher's Notice
    PUBLISHER’S NOTICE PUBLISHER’S NOTICE This newsletter is the official organ of the New Zealand Mathematical Society Inc. This issue was assembled and printed at Massey University. The official address of the Society is: The New Zealand Mathematical Society, c/- The Royal Society of New Zealand, P.O. Box 598, Wellington, New Zealand. However, correspondence should normally be sent to the Secretary: Dr Shaun Hendy Industrial Research Limited Gracefield Research Centre P O Box 31310, Lower Hutt [email protected] NZMS Council and Officers President Associate Professor Mick Roberts (Massey University, Albany) Outgoing Vice President Professor Rod Downey (Victoria University of Wellington) Secretary Dr Shaun Hendy (Industrial Research Limited, Lower Hutt) Treasurer Dr Tammy Smith (Massey University) Councillors Dr Michael Albert (University of Otago), to 2006 Dr Shaun Hendy (Industrial Research Limited), to 2004 Professor Gaven Martin (The University of Auckland), to 2005 Dr Warren Moors (The University of Auckland), to 2006 Dr Charles Semple (University of Canterbury), to 2005 Dr Tammy Smith (Massey University, Palmerston North), to 2005 Professor Geoff Whittle (Victoria University of Wellington), to 2004 Membership Secretary Dr John Shanks (University of Otago) Newsletter Editor Professor Robert McLachlan (Massey University, Palmerston North) Legal Adviser Dr Peter Renaud (University of Canterbury) Archivist Emeritus Professor John Harper (Victoria University of Wellington) Visitor Liaison Dr Stephen Joe (The University of Waikato) Publications Convenor
    [Show full text]