Year 2018 (PDF, 2.42
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
OPENING of the LEGAL YEAR 2019 Speech by Attorney-General
OPENING OF THE LEGAL YEAR 2019 Speech by Attorney-General, Mr Lucien Wong, S.C. Monday, 7 January 2019 Supreme Court Building, Level Basement 2, Auditorium May it please Your Honours, Chief Justice, Judges of Appeal, Judges and Judicial Commissioners of the Supreme Court, Introduction: AGC in Support of the Government, for the People 1 2018 was a fast-paced year for the Government and for the Attorney-General’s Chambers. The issues occupying the thoughts of Singapore’s leaders were complex and varied, with several key themes coming to the fore. These themes shaped our work over the past year, as we strove to be a strategic partner in support of the Government’s plans and initiatives, for the benefit of our country and its citizens. I will touch on three of these themes. 2 The first theme was our Smart Nation. This initiative aims to tap on the ongoing digital revolution in order to transform Singapore through technology. The Smart Nation vision is for Singapore to be a world-class leader in the field of digital innovation, resting on the triple pillars of a digital economy, digital government, and digital society. The Smart Nation revolution will play a critical part in ensuring our continued competitiveness on the world stage, powered by digital innovation. 1 3 Data sharing was and continues to be a critical aspect of this initiative. To this end, a new law was passed in 2018 which introduced a data sharing regime among different agencies in the Singapore Government. The Public Sector (Governance) Act 2018, which was drafted by our Chambers in support of this initiative, underpins and formalises a data sharing framework for the Singapore public sector. -
Chief Justice's Foreword
CHIEF JUSTICE’S FOREWORD As I have said on previous occasions, the Judiciary together with community partners, launched the is the custodian of the sacred trust to uphold first part of a Witness Orientation Toolkit to help the rule of law. To this end, it must not only hand prepare vulnerable witnesses for their attendance down judgments which are fair and well-reasoned, in court. Similarly, the Family Justice Courts worked but also ensure that justice is accessible to all, closely with the Family Bar to publish, earlier this for it is only by so doing that it can command the January, the second edition of The Art of Family trust, respect and confidence of the public. This Lawyering, which is an e-book that hopes to is indispensable to the proper administration of encourage family lawyers to conduct proceedings justice. in a manner that reduces acrimony between the parties, focuses on the best interests of the child, This One Judiciary Annual Report will provide an and conduces towards the search for meaningful overview of the work done by the Supreme Court, long-term solutions for families. the State Courts and the Family Justice Courts in 2018 to enhance our justice system to ensure that it On the international front, we continued to continues to serve the needs of our people. expand our international networks. Regionally, we deepened our engagement with ASEAN by playing host to a series of events involving the ASEAN legal community and will continue our outreach as Strengthening Our Justice System Both of Social Sciences School of Law to develop the I see through the rest of my term as President of The Road Ahead Within and Without law school’s curriculum and the design of its Legal the ASEAN Law Association. -
5Th ASIA-PACIFIC JUDICIAL COLLOQUIUM LITIGATION CONFERENCE 2019 FAMILY CONFERENCE 2019: SUPPORTING, HEALING & RECONSTRUCTING
ISSUE 02 • SEP 2019 5th ASIA-PACIFIC JUDICIAL LITIGATION FAMILY CONFERENCE COLLOQUIUM CONFERENCE 2019 2019: SUPPORTING, HEALING & RECONSTRUCTING SEP 2019 02 HIGHLIGHTS HIGHLIGHTS 5th Asia-Pacific Judicial Colloquium 01 Litigation Conference 2019 03 Family Conference 2019: 04 Supporting, Healing & Reconstructing th EVENTS & INITIATIVES 5 ASIA-PACIFIC Harnessing Technology to Enhance 05 International Knowledge Exchange JUDICIAL COLLOQUIUM FJC’s Family Judges’ Learning Week 06 The biennial event was attended by Chief Justices and Judges from the apex courts of Australia, Canada, Hong 2019 Kong, New Zealand and Singapore. They had congregated at the Supreme Court of Singapore for a frank, open and rich discussion on issues centred on court administration and recent development in the law of contract and Fundraising Carnivals by the 07 equitable compensation, as well as current issues in Public and International Law. Singapore Courts Some of the topics discussed at the colloquium included – Civil Justice Reforms, Maintaining the Dignity of the Court State Courts Reach Out to 08 in the Face of Criticism, Contractual Interpretation, Equitable Compensation for Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Climate the Community Change and the Law, as well as the Hague Convention and Transnational Custody Disputes. th State Courts Strive for a 09 The 5 Asia-Pacific Judicial Colloquium commenced with a welcome reception on the evening of 27 May at the Digital-ready Workforce Supreme Court and concluded with a social programme on 30 May at Jewel Changi Airport for all -
1 Response by Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon Opening
RESPONSE BY CHIEF JUSTICE SUNDARESH MENON OPENING OF THE LEGAL YEAR 2020 Monday, 6 January 2020 Mr Attorney, Mr Vijayendran, Honoured Guests, Members of the Bar, Ladies and Gentlemen: I. INTRODUCTION 1. It gives me great pleasure, on behalf of the Judiciary, to welcome you to this morning’s proceedings. I am especially grateful to the Honourable Prof Dr M Hatta Ali, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, the Right Honourable Tan Sri Tengku Maimun binti Tuan Mat, Chief Justice of Malaysia, the Honourable Slaikate Wattanapan, President of the Supreme Court of Thailand, and our other guests from abroad for being with us this morning. 2. Over the past year, the Judiciary has been involved in a number of significant reforms in both its domestic and international fields of work. This morning, I will provide a broad overview of our progress and outline some anticipated 1 changes, before turning to some broader issues concerning the future of our profession. Let me begin by briefly reviewing the changes within the Judiciary. II. FELICITATIONS 3. Justices Pang Khang Chau, Audrey Lim, Ang Cheng Hock and Vincent Hoong were appointed as Judges of the High Court following their terms as Judicial Commissioners. We have also just welcomed Judicial Commissioner Mohan S/O Ramamirtha Subbaraman, who brings years of experience in admiralty practice as one of our first Senior Accredited Specialists in Maritime and Shipping law. These appointments will enhance the quality and the diversity of the Bench. 4. In addition to the extensions I foreshadowed in my Response last year, we retained the deep experience of Justices Woo Bih Li and Tan Siong Thye, each of whom has been re-appointed for a term of two years. -
Opening of the Legal Year 2021 Speech
RESPONSE BY CHIEF JUSTICE SUNDARESH MENON OPENING OF THE LEGAL YEAR 2021 Monday, 11 January 2021 Mr Attorney, Mr Vijayendran, Honoured Guests, Members of the Bar, Ladies and Gentlemen: I. INTRODUCTION 1. On behalf of the Judiciary, I am delighted to welcome you to the Opening of this Legal Year. I am very grateful to all of you, including those from abroad, for taking the time to join us for today’s proceedings by way of video- conference. 2. The Opening of this Legal Year is historic in two senses at least. First, this marks the first time the Opening of the Legal Year is being hosted in the premises of the State Courts. Second, these proceedings, in common with many court hearings this past year, are being conducted using an internet- based remote conferencing platform. As routine as this might seem today, it would have been simply inconceivable just a year ago. This is a sign of the 1 far-reaching effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on nearly every aspect of our personal and professional lives. 3. Over the past year, we have all had to adapt rapidly in order to contend with the challenges foisted upon us by the pandemic. Amidst our collective efforts to cope with this, we were also confronted with a case that both of you, Mr Attorney and Mr Vijayendran, have spoken of, that seemed to challenge the foundations of our criminal justice system. As we look back on all this, I think it can safely be said that all of us have had a challenging year and the outlook is likely to remain somewhat difficult for the immediate future. -
Annex a WRITE-UPS on the JUDICIAL COMMISSIONERS Mr
Annex A WRITE-UPS ON THE JUDICIAL COMMISSIONERS Mr Chua Lee Ming 1 Mr Chua, age 55, joined the Legal Service in 1984, and has considerable and varied legal experience. He held various appointments including as a Deputy Registrar, Magistrate and Coroner of the then-Subordinate Courts in 1984, and also served in the Supreme Court Registry. He was appointed a Deputy Public Prosecutor in the Attorney-General’s Chambers in 1989. Mr Chua left for private practice in 1990 and became a Partner of the law firm, Lee & Lee, in 1991. He joined the GIC Pte Ltd in 1998 and later became the General Counsel. He is currently still with the company, serving as an advisor. Mr Chua obtained his Bachelor of Laws from the National University of Singapore in 1983 and received his Master of Laws from Cambridge University in 1988. Mr Chua is married with two children. Mr Foo Chee Hock 2 Mr Foo, age 54, joined the Legal Service in 1984 and has had more than 25 years’ experience in the judicial branch of the Legal Service, holding various appointments in the then Subordinate Courts (as Magistrate and District Judge) and the Supreme Court. Mr Foo was appointed as an Assistant Registrar of the Supreme Court from 1985 to 1989. He was appointed Deputy Registrar of the Supreme Court in 2001 and assumed the role of Registrar in 2009. He has also held the post of Registrar of the Appeals Board (Land Acquisition) and Assistant Director at the Legal Aid Bureau. Mr Foo obtained his Bachelor of Laws from the National University of Singapore in 1984 and received his Master of Laws from Queen’s College, Cambridge University in 1989. -
SAL Annual Report 2013
ANNUAL REPORT 2013/14 Edge SINGAPORE ACADEMY OF LAW Contents 02 03 05 Our Mission & Vision The President’s Review The Senate 07 11 The Executive Committee Leading Learning: Legal Knowledge 19 27 Leading Performance: Legal Industry Leading Change: Corporate Services 31 33 Key Executives Financial Review MCI (P) 028/10/2014 Our Mission & Vision VISION Singapore – The legal hub of Asia MISSION Driving legal excellence through thought leadership, world-class infrastructure and solutions. The Singapore Academy of Law (“the Academy”) is the promotion and development agency for Singapore’s legal industry. Our vision is to make Singapore the legal hub of Asia. We aim to drive legal excellence through developing thought leadership, world-class infrastructure and legal solutions. We do this by building up the intellectual capital of the legal profession by enhancing legal knowledge, raising the international profile of Singapore law, promoting Singapore as a centre for dispute resolution and improving the efficiency of legal practice through the use of technology. As a body established by statute, the Academy also undertakes statutory functions such as stakeholding services and the appointment of Senior Counsel, Commissioners for Oaths and Notaries Public. The Academy is headed by the Honourable the Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon. We have over 10,000 members comprising members of the Bench, the Bar, Legal Service Officers, corporate counsel, legal academics and foreign lawyers. The President’s Review 2013 was a watershed year for the Singapore Academy of Law (“the Academy”). It marked 25 years of the Academy’s existence as a membership body of the legal profession in Singapore. -
Opening of the Legal Year 2020 Speech by the President of the Law Society
Opening of the Legal Year 2020 Speech by the President of the Law Society 1. May it please Your Honours, Chief Justice, Judges of Appeal, Judges and Judicial Commissioners. WELCOME AND INTRODUCTION 2. First, let me extend a warm welcome to our overseas Bar leaders who have travelled from Australia, Brunei, Guangzhou, Hong Kong, Japan, Malaysia and England to join us for this Ceremony. 3. In 2019, we witnessed several appointments and reappointments to the Supreme Court Bench :- (i) Justices Woo Bih Li and Tan Siong Thye extended; (ii) Judicial Commissioners Pang Khang Chau, Audrey Lim and Ang Cheng Hock appointed as High Court Judges; and (iv) boosting the stature of the Singapore International Commercial Court, Arjan Kumar Sikri and Douglas Samuel Jones appointed International Judges. 4. The international recognition of our first class judiciary was further evidenced by Justice Kannan Ramesh’s appointment as Judicial Commissioner of the Brunei Supreme Court on 7 October 2019. 5. This year, congratulations are in order to former Supreme Court Registrar and erstwhile Judicial Commissioner Vincent Hoong on his days old appointment as Judge. We also warmly welcome Mohan Subbaraman, a leading light of the maritime bar, as Judicial Commissioner who will add ballast to the Bench. 6. On behalf of my Council, I extend my best wishes to the new and renewed judicial appointees. We are confident that they will judge with just judgment and demonstrate judicial excellence. The track record of serving members of Your Honour’s judiciary exemplify humility, integrity and dispatch – qualities singled out by US Chief Justice John Roberts in his 2019 year-end report. -
Vision Contents to Establish and Maintain a World Class Judiciary Chief Justice’S Message 04
02 SUPREME COURT OF SINGAPORE VisioN Contents To establish and maintain a world class Judiciary Chief Justice’s Message 04 2016 Supreme Court Key Initiatives 06 MissioN The Supreme Court Bench 11 To superintend the administration of justice Organisational Structure 19 Constitution & Jurisdiction 24 VALUes Event Highlights 31 Fairness Accessibility Performance & Statistics 43 Independence, Integrity, Impartiality Responsiveness ANNUAL report 2016 05 CHief Justice’S Message It gives me great pleasure to present for the very first time, Courts “future-ready” while the Singapore Academy of Law a One Judiciary annual report boxed set, which showcases has launched the Legal Technology Vision to help the legal the work of the Supreme Court, the State Courts and sector adopt and implement technological changes. the Family Justice Courts sharing a common mission to superintend the administration of justice and make justice The Supreme Court and State Courts, together with NTU accessible to all. Themed “Upholding Our Values”, SPIRIT Centre, have embarked on the development of the reports detail the work of the three Courts and their an Intelligent Case Retrieval System. The aim is to have a initiatives that are underpinned by the values of fairness, more effective retrieval of key legal documents in decided accessibility, independence, integrity and impartiality. cases for road traffic accidents and personal injury matters. Besides making it easier and quicker for legal research to The Judiciary will have to respond to an increasingly be performed, it will add to the quality of decision making challenging global and economic climate. We must enhance and judgment writing for judges. The technology developed the quality of our work even as we look to reduce the cost through this platform may even perform other legal of litigating by simplifying processes where possible. -
Judiciary / Annual Report 2019 One Judiciary
ONE JUDICIARY / ANNUAL REPORT 2019 ONE JUDICIARY Annual Report 2019 SUPREME COURT, SINGAPORE STATE COURTS, SINGAPORE FAMILY JUSTICE COURTS, SINGAPORE ONE JUDICIARY / ANNUAL REPORT 2019 02 CHIEF JUSTICE’S FOREWORD 2019 was a significant year both for our nation, which celebrated Court of Appeal, the new Appellate Division of the High Court time-honoured practices within the legal community, ranging its bicentennial, and for the Judiciary, which saw the State Courts was established last year and is expected to become operational from the way in which we educate and train aspiring lawyers to move into the new State Courts Towers in December 2019 after in the second half of 2020. The Criminal Procedure Rules the role and function of the courts within a more complex and some four decades in the iconic Octagon building. The 173m tall Committee also commenced its work to codify and streamline diverse society. State Courts Towers is not only a striking new landmark but also criminal procedure and practice, and the Committee to Review a purpose-built institution that is fully equipped to meet the legal and Enhance Reforms in the Family Justice System submitted a Out of these challenges, the COVID-19 situation has undoubtedly needs of an evolving society. Technology is pervasive throughout set of recommendations on how principles of therapeutic justice been one of the most difficult and urgent to have beset us, the Towers, which are outfitted with digital recording facilities, may be infused into our system of family justice to achieve better certainly within the span of most of our lifetimes. -
Opening of the Legal Year 2010 Speeches
RESPONSE BY CHIEF JUSTICE SUNDARESH MENON OPENING OF THE LEGAL YEAR 2015 Monday, 5 January 2015 Mr Attorney, Mr Thio Shen Yi SC, Members of the Bar, Ladies and Gentlemen: I. Introduction 1. It gives me great pleasure to welcome all of you to this morning’s proceedings. I am especially grateful to the Right Honourable Tun Arifin bin Zakaria, Chief Justice of Malaysia, and the Honourable Truong Hoa Binh, Chief Justice of the Supreme People’s Court of Vietnam, and our many guests from abroad who have travelled to be with us this morning. 2. Mr Attorney and Mr Thio, you have both alluded to the particular importance of this, the 50th year of our nationhood. What a distance we have travelled as a people in that time! Accompanying our progression as a nation has been the development of our legal system, which, as I observed in my Response at my Welcome Reference, is foundational to liberty and to order in our society. We have very much to be grateful for as we look back and very much to anticipate as we look ahead. 1 A. Farewells 3. Let me begin with a brief retrospective of the year just past, which saw a significant number of changes to the Bench with four departures and six arrivals. Foremost among these was your appointment, Mr Attorney, following a decade of great distinction on the Bench. I congratulate you on your appointment and look forward to your continuing service to our community. I am certain that both the Attorney-General’s Chambers, and more generally, the Singapore public, will benefit from your leadership. -
Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon
RESPONSE BY CHIEF JUSTICE SUNDARESH MENON OPENING OF THE LEGAL YEAR 2017 MONDAY, 9 JANUARY 2017 Mr Attorney Mr Vijayendran Members of the Bar Ladies and Gentlemen, I. Introduction 1. On behalf of the Judiciary, it gives me great pleasure to welcome you to this morning’s proceedings. I am especially grateful to the Honourable Chief Justice James Allsop of the Federal Court of Australia, the Honourable Chief Justice Prof Dr M Hatta Ali and Justice Takdir Rahmadi of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, and the Right Honourable Tun Arifin bin Zakaria, Chief Justice of Malaysia, for joining us this morning. II. Felicitations 2. As you have each already noted, we enter this New Year amidst notable changes in the composition of the Bench and also in the leadership of the Attorney-General’s Chambers and the Law Society. 1 3. Justice Judith Prakash and Justice Tay Yong Kwang were appointed as Judges of Appeal last year. Justice Prakash served more than two decades in the High Court and many of her judgments, in particular on arbitration and commercial law, have been influential both domestically and internationally. Justice Tay, who served almost two decades in the High Court, has deep experience in criminal and public law and also commands immense respect in all matters of civil procedure. Both of them will add to the collective strength and diversity of the Court of Appeal, which now has a complement of 5 judges. I look forward to their contributions to the jurisprudence of our apex court. 4. Justice Chao Hick Tin’s term was extended until the later part of this year.