<<

SHOWCASE SPECIES: SOUTHEAST

PIPING IN THE SOUTHEAST

The Issue early counts of piping plover breeding pairs indi- Ycate that the population is increasing along the Atlantic Coast as the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service works with private organizations and with state, county and other federal agencies to protect the species’ habi- tat from development and harmful human intrusion.

Natural History Typical shorebirds, piping have - colored backs and crowns contrasting with white CRAIG BIHRLE, NDGFD underbellies. Breeding bear a single black breast band, a black bar across the forehead, bright orange legs loss and human disturbance of nesting and a bright orange bill tipped with black. In winter, adults and chicks are key threats to these birds. the birds lose the black bands, the legs fade to pale Recreational and commercial development have yellow, and the beak turns mostly black. Adults weigh brought people and predatory pets into nesting areas, 1.5 to 2 ounces and are about seven inches long from and dune stabilization has resulted in the loss of the beak to tail tip, with a wingspan of 15 inches. open, sandy the piping plover requires. In the , the breeds in three Invasive, nonnative plants, such as a Pacifi c Rim distinct areas—the Northern , the Great ornamental called vitex, have overgrown Lakes and the Atlantic Coast. The Atlantic Coast stretches of shore, crowding out native plant species population nests on sandy beaches from south such as sea beach amaranth that, like the piping to . The birds scrape out shallow plover, inhabit recently disturbed beaches, such as depressions that they line with light-colored pebbles those washed over and swept clean by storms. Human and shell fragments, against which the mottled eggs— activities also have attracted wild predators in search average clutch size is four eggs—are well camoufl aged. of food to beaches used by piping plovers, increasing Eggs hatch within a month and the young can fl y about predation from , gulls and crows and causing 30 days after hatching. abandonment of plover nesting sites and reductions in After nesting, Atlantic Coast plovers move south plover productivity. to spend eight to ten months—from July or even late Measures to counteract these threats (see section June through March or April, with a few lingering on “Management”) seem to be helping, however, as into early May—along the coast from North Carolina the estimate of breeding pairs on the U.S. Atlantic through and in parts of the , joined Coast indicates a 10.5 percent increase between 2001 there by piping plovers from all populations (North and 2002 and a 0.4 percent gain in 2003. Preliminary Carolina holds a unique position as the only state fi gures for 2004 and 2005 suggest that these gains have where the breeding and wintering ranges overlap remained stable. Recovery measures that the U.S. Fish and where the birds are present year-round.). The and Wildlife Service and other agencies take for piping extensive use the plovers make of the Southeast plover recovery help a host of other species that use the Atlantic Coast indicates the region’s importance to same habitat, including the northeastern beach tiger the species’ survival. beetle, loggerhead sea turtle and seabeach amaranth, all federally listed as threatened.

FAIR FUNDING FOR WILDLIFE 33 PIPING PLOVER

Listing Service. “Plovers are a The U.S. Fish and Wild- shining example of a life Service in 1986 listed the successful, well-funded Atlantic Coast piping plover recovery program,” says as threatened. John Kostyack, director of Wildlife Conservation Management Campaigns at the National The U.S. Fish and Wild- Wildlife Federation. life Service has focused on “Increasing funding to the habitat protection as the key Service for recovery will approach to piping plover undoubtedly give us more recovery. Working with of these success stories.” state, county and private CRAIG BIHRLE, NDGFD groups, the Service seeks to Local Contacts minimize human disturbance of the birds by limiting F.G. Courtney, National Wildlife Federation the use of motor vehicles in nesting and roosting areas Southeastern Natural Resource Center, Atlanta, and by requiring visitors with pets to keep dogs leashed, Georgia, 404-876-8733; Fish and Wildlife Region Four as dogs will chase the birds and disturb nests. The Offi ce, Division, 404-697-7100; agency has developed beach management plans that John Fussel, NC bird expert, 252-240-1046 include controlling human beach activity, protecting nests from predators such as raccoons and crows, and Other Threats restoring natural beach vegetation while allowing Beach development and recreation are persistent natural processes, such as overwashing by storms, to threats. produce and maintain the open stretches of beach vital to the birds. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service also has worked with local authorities, the U.S. Army Corps THREATS FROM of Engineers and state coastal agencies to ensure that beach replenishment projects, which involve dredging GLOBAL WARMING sand from offshore and relocating it on eroding beaches in developed areas, are accomplished in ways that Rising sea levels caused by minimize damage to piping plover habitat. Removal global warming will jeopardize the of beach vitex and other invasive plants also is helping piping plover by eliminating or to restore beaches to conditions more favorable to the damaging nesting and feeding habitat. plover and other open-beach species. A signifi cant increase in the rate of sea- level rise due to melting glaciers and ice caps and to Funding thermal expansion of the oceans is one of the most Funding from all government sources for piping direct consequences of global warming. plover recovery outside the area ranks the species at 58 out of 1,311 species, according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service fi scal year 2004 report (the most recent available) to Congress, Federal and State Endangered and Expenditures. Total * The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Federal and State Endangered and Threatened recovery funding for piping plovers outside the Great Species Expenditures report incorporates subjective estimates provided by regulated entities without any independent verifi cation and without effort to Lakes area, from all state and federal sources that year, segregate Endangered Species Act expenditures from other related expendi- was about $3.5 million, with $496,000 coming from the tures. However, for most listed species, no other funding data is available.

34 NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION