Mcdowell County Comprehensive Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mcdowell County Comprehensive Plan MCDOWELL COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WVULAW Land Use and Sustainable Development Law Clinic ADOPTED _ WVULAW Land Use and Sustainable Development Law Clinic “McDowell County, West Virginia, a community on the rise, is INTRODUCTION rich in history, outdoor recreation, and friendly, hardworking, and ery few places in West Virginia have the history welcoming people. The county attracts visitors from all over the and mystique of McDowell County. The south- world to adventure, leading the way as the backbone of southern ernmost county in the Mountain State, McDow- Vell County has left an indelible mark on the region. West Virginia’s tourism industry.” With a past that often seems bigger than life, the tales of this beautiful and rugged place are now tempered by the challenges of today. Once the bustling epicenter —McDowell County’s Vision Statement of coal country, McDowell County now faces complex and longstanding issues. The vision statement serves as the foundation for Issues include high levels of substance abuse, lack future planning and decision-making in McDowell of infrastructure, a dwindling economy, lack of jobs, a County. The vision statement is forward-thinking and large number of abandoned and dilapidated structures, can help ensure that future decisions align with the and inadequate health care. While there are no easy goals and objectives set forth in the plan. Further- ways to address these issues, the community can de- more, recommendations and actions steps in the com- velop a plan that acknowledges the issues, identifies prehensive plan should be consistent with the vision methods to address the issue, and prioritizes the meth- statement. Developing a comprehensive plan would ods so there is structure and guidance moving forward. allow the community to determine how to address the Some of the recommendations that have been iden- most important issues facing McDowell County. tified during the comprehensive plan process include At the beginning of the comprehensive plan process developing a countywide inventory of abandoned and in 2016, county officials reached out to all the -mu dilapidated structures and continuing to seek resourc- nicipalities and asked if the municipalities wanted to es for water and wastewater service, upgrades, and ex- participate in the comprehensive plan process. All ten pansion. Other comprehensive plan objectives include (10) communities agreed to participate in the compre- exploring the use of public/private partnerships as an hensive plan process with the idea that each munici- option for responsible development growth, encourag- pality could adopt the county comprehensive plan as ing the growth of the tourism industry, and focusing on their own. As part of this process, the municipalities prevention and education related to substance abuse. have discussed strengths and weaknesses, and map- In order to have a roadmap for where the community ping that will help inform the entire plan. This Chap- wants to go, there needs to be a vision. As part of the ter highlights the framework of the plan and explains comprehensive plan process, McDowell County Offi- why the county and the municipalities are completing cials created the following vision statement: a comprehensive plan. 2 McDowell County Comprehensive Plan — 3 Berwind Lake ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The comprehensive plan is not one person or one group’s plan, the plan speaks for and represents the entire county. In fact, McDowell County will become one of the first counties in the state to develop a truly countywide comprehensive plan, as all ten municipal- ities participated in the development of the county’s comprehensive plan. While impossible to acknowledge all people, or- ganizations, and groups that participated in the comprehensive plan process, the following list identifies those who have provided significant in- Contents put into the plan’s development: McDowell County Commission McDowell County Planning Commission 2 Chapter One: Introduction Municipalities: Advantages of creating a comprehensive plan 12 Chapter Two: County and Town of Anawalt City of Keystone Prepares a community for the future Municipal Overview Town of Bradshaw Town of Kimball Promotes coordination between various levels of Town of Davy Town of Northfork government 64 Chapter Three: Critical Issues City of Gary City of War Helps establish short- and long-term priorities Town of Iaeger City of Welch Increases the chances for successful grant 104 Chapter Four: Action Plan applications Region I Planning and Development Council 136 Appendices McDowell County Citizens and Stakeholders WHY MCDOWELL The Land Use and Sustainable Development COUNTY DEVELOPED A Law Clinic, WVU College of Law COMPREHENSIVE PLAN McDowell County Public Library The comprehensive plan process provides an op- portunity for residents, business owners, and local McDowell County Planning Commission elected officials to examine the current conditions in their community and decide how to address identified Mr. Cecil Mr. Mack Davis issues. Over the last several decades, McDowell Coun- Patterson, ty has experienced a significant decline in population, President Ms. Emily Miller high unemployment rates, and high levels of substance abuse. Due to these challenges, and with an eye to the Mr. John Derek Mr. Harold future, the county decided to develop a comprehensive Tyson, Vice Patterson plan. Many studies and plans have already been gen- President erated for McDowell County. Therefore, the planning Mr. David Rudolph commission attempted to incorporate pertinent parts Mr. Jay Chatman of those studies and plans without causing overlap or duplication. 4 McDowell County Comprehensive Plan — 5 During the comprehensive plan process, county and terviews, and visioning exercises. The Land Use and municipal officials analyzed components such as land Sustainable Development Law Clinic at West Virginia LEGAL REQUIREMENTS PUBLIC HEARINGS use, transportation, housing, economic development, University College of Law (“Land Use Clinic”) has fa- The West Virginia Code, Chapter 8A: Land Use The West Virginia Code requires that the planning recreation, and community facilities. Preparing for the cilitated the comprehensive plan process and assisted Planning, establishes the requirements that local gov- commission give notice and hold a public hearing. Af- future via a comprehensive plan allows local govern- in drafting the comprehensive plan. ernments must follow when developing a comprehen- ter the public hearing, the McDowell County Planning ments to make informed decisions on issues that are Each municipality was involved throughout the sive plan. Chapter 8A, Article 3 details the required Commission must submit the recommended plan to relevant to its citizens. While numerous advantages planning process and provided input regarding their elements of a comprehensive plan. Tables 1.1 and 1.2 the county commission and present the draft to the exist for developing a comprehensive plan, one of the specific needs and goals. Upon adoption of the com- (pages 5-6) of Chapter 1 direct readers to where they county commission. The McDowell County Commis- greatest advantages is the creation of a blueprint for prehensive plan by McDowell County, each of these can find the components and objectives required un- sion is then required to hold another public hearing how McDowell County should move forward in the municipalities’ governing bodies can decide whether der Chapter 8A, Article 3 in the comprehensive plan. prior to adopting the comprehensive plan. Each of the next 10-15 years. Not only does the comprehensive to adopt the county comprehensive plan as their own. Chapter 8, Article 3, of the West Virginia Code municipalities must also hold a public hearing before plan provide guidance as to what to do, but the plan enables county comprehensive plans to include the consenting to the comprehensive plan. also recommends who will do the work, and how . planning of municipalities within the county. Munic- much the projects will cost to complete. ipalities can adopt a county-wide comprehensive plan As McDowell County prepares to move forward in as their own, but only with consent of the governing otherwise difficult economic times, residents, local of- WHAT INFORMATION body of the municipality. Each municipality needs to ficials, and business owners have an opportunity to be Town of Anawalt participate in the comprehensive plan process, which DOES A COMPREHENSIVE a force of positive change in their community. The in- includes meeting to analyze current conditions, dis- formation gathered throughout the planning process Town of Bradshaw cuss issues, mapping, and soliciting for public input. PLAN INCLUDE? has been carefully integrated into the comprehensive Each of the following ten municipalities in McDowell plan so that future decision makers will understand The Land Use Clinic ensured that the McDowell County will need to consent to adopting the McDow- the reasoning behind the recommendations of the Town of Davy County Comprehensive Plan fully complied with the ell County Comprehensive Plan as their own munici- plan. West Virginia Code. A comprehensive plan is required City of Gary pal comprehensive plan. to address certain components; however, a community may choose to focus on specific issues in their plan. Town of Iaeger This comprehensive plan focuses on the issues most WHO DEVELOPED THE important to McDowell County, while complying with the general requirements of Chapter 8A of the West COMPREHENSIVE PLAN? City of Keystone Virginia
Recommended publications
  • Calendar No. 822
    Calendar No. 822 110TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! 2d Session SENATE 110–390 AMERICA’S HISTORICAL AND NATURAL LEGACY STUDY ACT JUNE 16, 2008.—Ordered to be printed Mr. BINGAMAN, from the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, submitted the following R E P O R T [To accompany H.R. 3998] The Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, to which was referred the Act (H.R. 3998) to authorize the Secretary of the Inte- rior to conduct special resources studies of certain lands and struc- tures to determine the appropriate means for preservation, use, and management of the resources associated with such lands and structures, having considered the same, reports favorably thereon with an amendment and recommends that the Act, as amended, do pass. The amendment is as follows: Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert in lieu thereof the following: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as ‘‘America’s Historical and Natural Legacy Study Act’’. SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF SECRETARY. In this Act, the term ‘‘Secretary’’ means the Secretary of the Interior. SEC. 3. HARRY S TRUMAN NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY. (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall conduct a special resource study of the Harry S Truman Birthplace State Historic Site (referred to in this section as the ‘‘birthplace site’’) in Lamar, Missouri, to determine— (1) the suitability and feasibility of— (A) adding the birthplace site to the Harry S Truman National Historic Site; or (B) designating the birthplace site as a separate unit of the National Park System; and (2) the methods and means for the protection and interpretation of the birth- place site by the National Park Service, other Federal, State, or local govern- ment entities, or private or nonprofit organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief Study of the Levisa Fork and Russell Fork Of
    A BRIEF STUDY OF THE LEVISA FORK AND RUSSELL FORK OF THE BIG SANDY RIVER by James B. Kirkwood INTRODUCTION The Levisa Fork of the Big Sandy River arises in Buchanan County', Virginia, and flows northwestward through Pike County, Floyd County, Johnson County and into Lawrence County, Kentucky, where the direction of flow becomes northward. The confluence of the Levisa Fork and Tug Fork at Louisa, Kentucky, forms the Big Sandy River which flows into the Ohio River at Catlettsburg, Kentucky. The Big Sandy River drains parts of Kentucky, West Virginia and Virginia. The basin covers an area of 4,281 square miles, of which 2,280 square miles are in Kentucky. Levisa Fork was chosen for study because of its importance as a fishing stream. Numerous centers of population are located along this stream. Accord- ing to the 1952 edition of the Rand McNally Reference Map, populations of the major centers were; Paintsville in Johnson County with a population of 4309, Prestonsburg in Floyd County with 3585 population, Pikeville in Pike County with 5154 population, and Elkhorn City, located on Russell Fork in Pike County, with 1349 population. The major tributaries of the Levisa Fork are: Paint Creek arising in Morgan and Magof fin Counties, Kentucky and entering Levisa Fork at Paintsville; John's Creek, on which Dewey Lake was formed, arises in Pike County and enters Levisa Fork near Prestonsburg; Beaver Creek begins in Knott County, Kentucky and enters Levisa Fork near Martin, Kentucky; Mud Creek is located entirely in Floyd County; Shelby Creek is located in Pike County; Russell Fork, which is reported on in this study, starts in Virginia and flows northwestward to its confluence with Levisa Fork at Millard, Kentucky.
    [Show full text]
  • 10 Men Killed and Others Wounded at Matewan, W. Va
    THE BATTLE OF MATEWAN CENTENNIAL EDITION Original Reprint Courtesy Of Wolfe Williams & Reynolds EXTRA! Black Lung Attorneys Matewan, WV, Logan, WV and Norton, VA Mingo Messenger 304 752-2126 YOUR SOURCE FOR ALL THINGS MINGO EXTRA! VOLUME IX NO. 20 • 28 PAGES MINGO COUNTY • WEEKEND EDITION, MAY 15-17, 2020 50 CENTS 10 MEN KILLED AND OTHERS WOUNDED AT MATEWAN, W. VA. Mayor, Seven Detectives and Two Miners Die in Battle Resulting From Union Troubles Ten men were killed addition to Felts were were widely divergent, ny. Local officials, this affirmative, according to two weeks and the mines and others shot in a bat- killed, and two miners. one report last night was report said, apparently police, and was in the act have been shut down. tle fought between mem- The list of dead fol- that the Baldwin-Felts sympathized with the of reading the Organizers are in bers of the Baldwin-Felts lows: Albert Felts, Cabell men had been the victims efforts which have been warrant when Mullens there organizing a union Detective agency and Testament, L. E. Felts, E. of an ambuscade and made for the unionization shot and killed him. and had stirred up much miners of the P. M. C. A., Powell, A. J. Booker, that most of them fell in of the Norfolk & Western Detective Ferguson, bad feeling. and Stone Mountain Coal J. W. Feguson, L. their tracks with but lit- coal fields, and refused officers say, then killed Gov. Cornwell sent companies in the streets M. Brown, C. B. Cun- tle chance to make a fight to serve the eviction war- Mullens, and the killing soldiers to Matewan of Matewan, Mingo-co., ningham, James Mullen, for their lives.
    [Show full text]
  • Change and Technology in the United States
    Change and Technology in the United States A Resource Book for Studying the Geography and History of Technology Stephen Petrina Including: 12 Printable Maps Showing 700+ Inventions from 1787-1987 279 Technological Events 32 Graphs and Tables of Historical Trends 5 Timelines of Innovation and Labor with Pictures Plus: 3 Tables for Cross-Referencing Standards 50 Links to WWW Resources and Portals 50+ Resource Articles, CDs, Books & Videos Change and Technology in the United States A Resource Book for Studying the Geography and History of Technology Dr. Stephen Petrina Copyright © 2004 by Stephen Petrina Creative Commons License Copies of this document are distributed by: Council on Technology Teacher Education (http://teched.vt.edu/ctte/HTML/Research1.html) International Technology Education Association 1914 Association Drive, Suite 201 Reston, VA 20191-1531 Phone (703) 860-2100 Fax (703) 860-0353 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.iteaconnect.org Note: Cover illustration— "Building New York City's Subway"— is from Scientific American 15 July 1915. Wright Plane Drawing reproduction courtesy of the National Air and Space Museum, Smithsonian Institution. Change and Technology in the United States Preface This project is the result of a project undertaken in my graduate program at the University of Maryland during the late 1980s. When I began, I did not fully realize the scale of the challenge. The research itself was extremely intimidating and time-consuming. It took me a few years to figure out what resources were most helpful in integrating the geography and history of technology. I completed eights maps in 1987 and did a fair amount of writing at the same time.
    [Show full text]
  • Recognition, Carswell Eroding Refuse
    Carswell Eroding Refuse AML Project Location: Kimball, McDowell County, West Virginia Submitted by: Charles J. Miller Assistant Director WV DEP, Abandoned Mine Lands and Reclamation 601 57th St., S.E. Charleston, WV 25304 Phone: (304) 926-0499 Email: [email protected] Project start date: 1/16/2006 Project complete date: 5/15/2007 Construction cost: $2,542,182 Responsible agency for reclamation: WV Department of Environmental Protection Division of Land Restoration Abandoned Mine Lands and Reclamation Contractor: Green Mountain Company Design Engineer: Ackenheil Engineers & Geologists Date Submitted: 5/12/2008 I. Background The Carswell Eroding Refuse project is located along Laurel Branch in the small coal mining community of Carswell Hollow, just north of the Town of Kimball, in West Virginia’s most southerly county of McDowell. This neighborhood is situated about 4 miles east of the City of Welch, the county seat, along US Route 52, and 12 miles north of Tazewell County, Virginia. The project area drains into Elkhorn Creek, which eventually flows into the Tug Fork River as it meanders its way westward to create the state boundary between Kentucky and West Virginia. Carswell, like so many other southern West Virginia communities, is inexorably linked to coal mining activities as they progressed throughout the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. During these periods, many of the mining operators constructed company homes adjacent to or even on top of coal refuse areas due to the severe shortage of flat land in the steep hollows, so often found in this part of West Virginia. Gradually, however, problems began to develop that ultimately threatened both properties and lives.
    [Show full text]
  • Labor History Theme Study: Phase Ill
    . .. · wl 1 zo D ~JJ.'1S F;Je.:. · /'/PS Genera I . ':'!>7 . · 1 '·,. : .... ' . ·. ,· ••• • /·'. ·,,];. .. .· ··~ji;:;;::::::;;:.~·;:~.. - ::::--:;:3=~ . ·.. • . • .· . .,,...--,;:;:.~.::.;'£/"-::-/ ,?'.:' . Labor.H1storyTheme·Stu.dy:_·Phase Ill· · . Department of the lnte~i~r • National Park Se.rvice •·Denver Ser:'ice Center .•. ; •• . PLEASE RETURN :ro: TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER ~ DENVER SERVICE CENTER ON MICROFILM . C@Il®rr §~ffiIID~. NATIONAL P'ARK. SERVICE 1/31/~3 • Labor History Theme Study: Phase Ill .. August 1997 • I Department of the Interior • National Park Service • Denver Service Center • • This document is dedicated to the memory of Dr. Stuart Kaufman, labor historian, 1942-1997. • • Executive Summary The National Historic Landmark (NHL) Theme Study on American Labor History, Phase Ill, prepared by the Denver Service Center of the National Park Service (NPS), evaluated the following 11 sites associated with the diverse labor history of the United States: • Audiffred Building - San Francisco, California • Butte-Anaconda Mining and Smelting Complex - Butte and Anaconda, Montana • Ford Motor I River Rouge Complex - Dearborn, Michigan • Harmony Mills Historic District- Cohoes, New York1 • Kate Mullany House -Troy, New York1 • Kingsley Plantation - Jacksonville, Florida • Matewan Historic District - Matewan, West Virginia • Puckett Family Farm - Granville County, North Carolina • Pullman Historic District - Chicago, Illinois • Sloss Furnaces - Birmingham, Alabama • Tredegar Iron Works - Richmond, Virginia The National Park Service did not undertake a comprehensive Special Resource Study pro­ cess, but instead it has provided preliminary findings concerning the suitability and feasibility of the 11 sites. Prior to any legislation enacted by Congress regarding one or more of the 11 sites, it is recommended that the National Park Service program special resource studies for these sites.
    [Show full text]
  • The Telling Takes Us Home: Taking Our Place in the Stories That Shape Us a Peopleʼs Pastoral from the Catholic Committee of Appalachia
    ii The Telling Takes Us Home: Taking Our Place in the Stories that Shape Us A Peopleʼs Pastoral from the Catholic Committee of Appalachia CATHOLIC COMMITTEE OF APPALACHIA Spencer, West Virginia A People's Pastoral from the Catholic Committee of Appalachia iii The Telling Takes Us Home: Taking Our Place in the Stories that Shape Us A PEOPLE’S PASTORAL FROM THE CATHOLIC COMMITTEE OF APPALACHIA © 2015 Catholic Committee of Appalachia. This text is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Interna- tional license. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. This license does not apply to photographs or artwork contained herein. Artwork and photographs appearing herein are used with permission and remain the property of the respective artists and photographers. Unless otherwise noted, scripture quotations are from The Inclusive Bible: The First Egalitarian Translation, copyright © 2007 Priests for Equality. Used by permission. All rights reserved. Cover and interior design by Liz Pavlovic, www.lizpavlovic.com Front and back cover art by Christopher Santer, www.christophersanter.com Printed in the USA by Morgantown Printing & Binding, Morgantown, W.Va. First printing, December 2015 Published by the Catholic Committee of Appalachia (CCA) 885 Orchard Run Spencer, WV 25276 [email protected] www.ccappal.org www.peoplespastoral.org Facebook – www.facebook.com/groups/ccappalachia Twitter – @ThisLandIsHome Contact CCA for additional copies. iv The Telling Takes Us Home:
    [Show full text]
  • Lesson 7: the Battles of Matewan and Blair Mountain Objectives: in This
    Lesson 7: The Battles of Matewan and Blair Mountain Objectives: ● In this lesson, the students will develop an understanding of the underlying causes of the Battles of Matewan and Blair Mountain. ● In an interactive role-play with maps and historic accounts, students will be interjected into making a tough decision: should they join the march on Blair Mountain or sit it out? Students will weigh the options. Materials Needed: ● Historical background student handout ● Guiding questions student handout Activity 1: Warm Up (Synchronous) Distribute the handout with the background on the story of the Battle of ​ Matewan and the murder of Sid Hatfield. Ask students to read it, silently, and think about how they would react if they were the miners and their families at Paint Creek and Cabin Creek. Having role-played these characters in previous lessons, encourage them to put themselves in the participants’ shoes in thinking about how they might feel during this event. (Asynchronous) Distribute the handout with the background on the story of the Battle of ​ Matewan and the murder of Sid Hatfield. Ask students to read it, silently, and think about how they would react if they were the miners and their families at Paint Creek and Cabin Creek. Having role-played these characters in previous lessons, encourage them to put themselves in the participants’ shoes in thinking about how they might feel during this event. Activity 2: (Synchronously) 1. Instruct students to read the description of the miners beginning to assemble at Marmet to march on Blair. Explain the points in favor of marching to Mingo armed versus those against, including the resistance being planned by Don Chafin in Logan County.
    [Show full text]
  • POLREP Number 3: Martin County Coal Corp Coal Slurry Release
    Site: HGd'a '9. Break: _.f3g,·""'t,_,o__ _ Othcrr ----- POLREP NUMBER 3 KENTUCKY/WEST VIRGINIA COAL SLURRY SPILL MARTIN COUNTY COAL CORPORATION INEZ, KY EVENT: MULTI-REGIONAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE ATTN: DOUG LAIR, EPA REGION IV CHARLIE KLEEMAN, EPA REGION III I. SITUATION (1700 HOURS, THURSDAY, 19 OCTOBER 2000) A At approximately 0200 hours on Wednesday, 11 October 2000, an estimated 250 million gallons of coal mine fine refuse slurry were released from a 72-acre impoundment operated by Martin County Coal Corporation (MCCC). The release occurred as a result of a sudden and unexpected breach into an underground mine adjacent to MCCC's refuse impoundment. The slurry entered both the WolfCreek and Rockcastle Creek watersheds ofMartin County, Kentucky. The spilled material has impacted more than 75 miles of surface water downstream of the site, including both the Tug Fork and Levisa Fork of the Big Sandy River, a tributary of the Ohio River. The Tug Fork and Big Sandy Rivers border both West Virginia and Kentucky. A Joint Information Center (JIC) has been established on site. The JIC serves to issue a joint press releases from EPA, the state of Kentucky and MCCC. The JIC will issue a press release by 1700 hours regarding analytical findings from samples collected by MCCC and Kentucky Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Cabinet (KYDNREPC). The OSC requests that all media inquiries be directed to the JIC at (606)395-0353. B. Several potable water and industrial intakes have been affected as a result of the spill. The following provides status and current activities being conducted regarding the affected systems: West Virginia: Fort Gay, WV, continues to conserve water by closing car washes and Laundromats.
    [Show full text]
  • Floods of March 1964 Along the Ohio River
    Floods of March 1964 Along the Ohio River GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1840-A Prepared in cooperation with the States of Kentucky, Ohio, Indiana, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia, and with agencies of the Federal Government Floods of March 1964 Along the Ohio River By H. C. BEABER and J. O. ROSTVEDT FLOODS OF 1964 IN THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1840-A Prepared in cooperation with the States of Kentucky, Ohio, Indiana, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia, and with agencies of the Federal Government UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1965 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price 65 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Abstract ------------------------------------------------------- Al Introduction.______-_-______--_____--__--_--___-_--__-_-__-__-____ 1 The storms.__---_------------__------------------------_----_--_- 6 The floods.___-__.______--____-._____.__ ._-__-.....__._____ 8 Pennsylvania.. _._-.------._-_-----___-__---_-___-_--_ ..___ 8 West Virginia.--.-._____--_--____--_-----_-----_---__--_-_-__- 11 Ohio.-.------.---_-_-_.__--_-._---__.____.-__._--..____ 11 Muskingum River basin._---___-__---___---________________ 11 Hocking River basin_______________________________________ 12 Scioto River basin______.__________________________________ 13 Little Miami River basin.__-____-_.___._-._____________.__. 13 Kentucky._.__.___.___---___----_------_--_-______-___-_-_-__
    [Show full text]
  • Four County Transit Transit Development Plan FY 2018-2027
    Four County Transit Transit Development Plan FY 2018-2027 Final Plan April 2017 Prepared for Under Contract to Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation Table of Contents Chapter 1 – Overview of Four County Transit Introduction ................................................................................................... 1-1 Purposes of the Transit Development Plan ................................................... 1-1 Planning Horizon ........................................................................................... 1-2 Plan Requirements ........................................................................................ 1-2 Four County Transit Background .................................................................. 1-3 History ........................................................................................................... 1-7 Governance and Organizational Structure .................................................... 1-8 Transit Services Provided and Areas Served ................................................ 1-8 Fare Structure ............................................................................................... 1-8 Existing Fleet and Facilities ........................................................................... 1-11 Transit Security Program .............................................................................. 1-13 Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Program ........................................ 1-14 Data Collection, Ridership and Revenue Reporting Methodology................
    [Show full text]
  • Data Sheet United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Inventory -- Nomination Form
    Form No. 10-300 (Rev. 10-74) DATA SHEET UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY -- NOMINATION FORM SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOWTO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS ____________TYPE ALL ENTRIES -- COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS______ [NAME HISTORIC The Hatfield-McCoy Feud Historic District_______________________ AND/OR COMMON Same _ LOCATION STREET & NUMBER See USGS Maps _NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY, TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT VICINITY OF 07 STATE CODE COUNTY CODE Kentucky 021 Pike 195 CLASSIFI CATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE ^DISTRICT —PUBLIC —OCCUPIED —AGRICULTURE —MUSEUM _BUILDING(S) —PRIVATE —UNOCCUPIED —COMMERCIAL —PARK —STRUCTURE XBOTH —WORK IN PROGRESS —EDUCATIONAL —PRIVATE RESIDENCE —SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE —ENTERTAINMENT —RELIGIOUS —OBJECT —IN PROCESS XYES: RESTRICTED ^GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC —BEING CONSIDERED X.YES: UNRESTRICTED(cemeteries) . —INDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION NO v ' —MILITARY OWNER OF PROPERTY cemetery NAME Multiple Owners (see continuation sheet) STREET & NUMBER CITY. TOWN STATE VICINITY OF LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE. REGISTRY OF DEEDS.ETC. Pike County Courthouse STREET & NUMBER CITY, TOWN STATE Pikeville Kentucky REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE Survey of Historic Sites in Kentucky DATE 1975 —FEDERAL X.STATE —COUNTY _LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS Kentucky Heritage Commission CITY, TOWN STATE JTrankfort Kentuckv DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE —EXCELLENT X.DETERIORATED XuNALTERED ^ORIGINAL SITE _GOOD X.RUINS —ALTERED _MOVED DATE_______ _FAIR X.UNEXPOSED DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE The Hatfield-McCoy Feud Historic District consists of three structures, three sites, and four graveyards in Pike County, Kentucky. The district is not contiguous, but in air distance spans approximately some 30 miles by 10 miles. Pike County is located in eastern Kentucky in the Cumberland Plateau region, an area characterized by sharp mountains and narrow, twisting valleys.
    [Show full text]