DOCSLIB.ORG

Evaluation of Tribal Food Security in Mysuru District-Karnataka

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evaluation of Tribal Food Security in Mysuru District-Karnataka International Journal of Research and Review www.ijrrjournal.com E-ISSN: 2349-9788; P-ISSN: 2454-2237 Original Research Article Evaluation of Tribal Food Security in Mysuru District-Karnataka Akash Raj D P1, Mahesh T M2 1Research Scholar, 2Professor, Institute of Development Studies, University of Mysore, Mysuru, Karnataka, India. Corresponding Author: Akash Raj D P ABSTRACT The paper was aimed to assess the food experience and food security in tribal areas of Mysuru district. Three taluks of the Mysuru district were selected for the study; H D Kote, Periyapatna and Hunsur. Primary survey of 500 households was carried with the set of different questions such as: a) household cannot afford balanced meals, b) food purchased does not last and no money for more food, c) household cuts meal size, d) household skips meal and e) one or more family members remain hungry all the day or night. Food security was assessed by set of questions like; a) Entitlement provided by FPS is enough or not; b) only a single meal in a day; c) households eat meals without vegetable, d) cereals, pulses and vegetables are not always available, e) members get less than the amount satisfying hunger. The survey revealed that 64.8% households often do not afford balanced meals; 53.6% of the households do not have money for more food to purchase and the purchased food does not last long; 70% of the population cuts meal size, 51% population skip meals and the 44% of the families have members hungry all day or night. The survey revealed that selected tribes experience inadequate food in their day to day life and hence causes severe food insecurity. Key words: Food insecurity, Tribes, Mysuru, food experience, Karnataka. INTRODUCTION not reach tribe population as they live Food is basic need for survival of isolated in few numbers. In India food any organism on earth and sufficient food is security is mainly focused on distribution of necessary to lead a healthy life. Food food grains through the public distribution security is an important means to realize the system (Nair K T, 2008). As per the socio right to food (Bhagatet al., 2010), which economic status of population living in the means the access to sufficient food to all country, tribes are more vulnerable who live persons of the household throughout the in poverty with higher malnutrition (Sinha, year. Government of India has been taking A K, 2014), the expenditure and living several initiatives to guarantee the food standard are poor than general population security of population through several (Kijima Y, 2006), higher illiteracy, lack of schemes like Mahatma Gandhi National awareness about the welfare schemes, poor Rural Employment Guarantee Act, Rural health status and poor sanitation are Landless Employment Guarantee common among the tribe community Programme; and distribution of entitlements (Mishra M, 2012). Hence the present study for reasonable price or free of cost. was taken up as it would help to understand Generally these developmental schemes do International Journal of Research & Review (www.gkpublication.in) 109 Vol.4; Issue: 1; January 2017 Akash Raj D P et al. Evaluation of Tribal Food Security in Mysuru District-Karnataka the weaker section of the society andthe consists of seven taluks such as Periyapatna, status of their livelihood. Heggadadevana Kote, Nanjangud, Hunsur, Tirumakudal Narsipur, Krishnarajanagara STUDY AREA and Mysore. As per the Census of India The study area lies in southern part 2011, the district ranks in 3rd place in total of Karnataka between 11° 44' 12.81" N and population, 2nd in density of population. 12° 39' 15.47" N latitude; and between 77° Among the total population of district 8' 6.94" E and 75° 54' 34.26" E longitude. scheduled caste comprises of 17.9 percent The area extension is 6,307 Sq.km. which and scheduled tribe consists of 11.1 percent. 74°0'0"E 76°0'0"E 78°0'0"E 70°0'0"E 80°0'0"E 90°0'0"E 100°0'0"E Districts States 18°0'0"N 18°0'0"N Karnataka India 30°0'0"N ± 30°0'0"N 20°0'0"N 20°0'0"N Karnataka 16°0'0"N 16°0'0"N 10°0'0"N 10°0'0"N 0 355 710 Km 70°0'0"E 80°0'0"E 90°0'0"E 100°0'0"E 76°0'0"E 76°20'0"E 76°40'0"E 77°0'0"E 12°40'0"N 12°40'0"N Taluks ± Mysore 14°0'0"N 14°0'0"N Piriyapatna 12°20'0"N 12°20'0"N Hunsur 12°0'0"N 12°0'0"N HD Kote MysoreMysore 12°0'0"N 12°0'0"N 0 87.5 175 Km 0 25 50 Km Selected Taluks 11°40'0"N 11°40'0"N 76°0'0"E 76°20'0"E 76°40'0"E 77°0'0"E 74°0'0"E 76°0'0"E 78°0'0"E Fig: 1 Study Area METHODOLOGY last and no money for more food, c) For the purpose of study, three household cuts meal size, d) household taluks in Mysuru district such as Priyapatna, skips meal and e) one or more family Hunsur and H D Kote were selected. The members hungry all the day or night. necessary data was collected through Further, to determine the food primary survey using well-structured security the related questions raised were; a) questionnaire. Totally, 500 households were Entitlement provide by FPS is not enough, surveyed to obtain the information about b) Only a single meal in a day, c) Household household experience and determination of eats meals without vegetables, d) Cereals, food security. To understand the experience Pulses, and Vegetable are not always of food security among the tribal available, e) Members get only less than the households, the related questions were amount satiating hunger, with two options raised such as, a) household cannot afford as YES or NO in the questionnaire. Based balance meals, b) food purchased does not on the response, the food security was International Journal of Research & Review (www.gkpublication.in) 110 Vol.4; Issue: 1; January 2017 Akash Raj D P et al. Evaluation of Tribal Food Security in Mysuru District-Karnataka measured among the five questions if “Yes” no money for more food”, 3 (0.6%) was mentioned for more than 4 questions it households represented always, 268 (53.6 was considered as food insecure, “Yes” for %) households stated often and 229 (45.8 three questions was considered as %) represented sometimes. Then for the chronically food insecure and “Yes” to two question “Household cuts meal size”, 2 (0.4 questions or below than that was considered %) households revealed always, 351 (70.2 as mildly insecure and “No” to all the %) represented often and 147 (29.4 %) questions was considered as food secured. stated sometimes. Further, for the question EXPERIENCE OF FOOD SECURITY “Household skips meal”, 1 (0.2 %) The result obtained from the household represented always, 259 (51.8 %) households represent that among the 500 represented often and 240 (48 %) revealed families, “for the question “Household sometimes. Then for the question “One or cannot afford balanced meals”, 15 (3 %) more family members hungry all day or households represented always, 324 (64.8) night”, 2 (0.4 %) households represented families represented often and 161 (32.2 %) always, 220 (44 %) represented often and households represented sometimes. The 278 (55.6 %) represented sometimes question “Food purchased does not last and (Table:1 and Fig:2). Table 1 Household Experience in Food security Experience Always Often Sometimes Total Household cannot afford balanced meals 15 324 161 500 (3) (64.8) (32.2) (100) Food purchased does not last and no money for more food 3 268 229 500 (0.6) (53.6) (45.8) (100) Household cuts meal size 2 351 147 500 (0.4) (70.2) (29.4) (100) Household skips meal 1 259 240 500 (0.2) (51.8) (48) (100) One or more family members hungry all day or night 2 220 278 500 (0.4) (44) (55.6) (100) Source: Primary Survey – 2015 Fig: 2 Household Experience in Food security 70.2 80 64.8 70 53.6 51.8 55.6 60 45.8 48 44 50 32.2 40 29.4 30 20 Percentof HH 3 10 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.4 Always 0 Often Household Food Household Household One or Sometimes cannot purchased cuts meal skips meal more family afford does not size members balanced last and no hungry all meals money for day or night more food Experience From the Table:1 it is visible that, households are not experienced always, more than 50 percent of households major proportion of households’ represented often for all the first four experienced often. questions and more than 40 percent of DETERMINATION OF FOOD household represented often for last SECURITY question, it clearly indicates, even though International Journal of Research & Review (www.gkpublication.in) 111 Vol.4; Issue: 1; January 2017 Akash Raj D P et al. Evaluation of Tribal Food Security in Mysuru District-Karnataka As mentioned earlier, to determine “Households eat meals without vegetables”, the food security of households, five 321 (64.2 %) households represented “Yes” questions were asked with “Yes” or “No” and 179 (35.8 %) represented “No”. Then choice, from the survey it was revealed that for the question “Cereals, Pulses, and for the question “Entitlement provide by Vegetable are not always available”, 437 FPS is not enough”, 377 (75.4 %) of (87.4 %) households represented “Yes” and households represented “Yes” and 123 (34.6 63 (12.6 %) represented “No”.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Land Identified for Afforestation in the Forest Limits of Mysuru District Μ
    Land identified for afforestation in the forest limits of Mysuru District µ Bettahalli Guluvina Attiguppe Hosuru Hosuru Mudiguppe Munjanahalli Mundur Kallikoppalu Dodda Koppalu Kanchanahalli Chikka Bherya Kallikoppalu Tandre Salekoppalu Tandrekoppalu Sankanahalli Somanahalli Bherya Melur Haradanahali Bachahalli Badiganahalli Madapura Katnalu Kurubarahalli Sugganahalli Abburu Doddadahalli Ramapura Mudlabidu Elemuddanahalli Harumballikoppalu Basavanahalli Kallimuddanahalli Karatalu Lakkikuppe Yaladahalli Kodiyala Manugonahalli Hebsuru Harumballi Lakkikuppekoppalu Ankanahalli Kanagalu Saligrama Hosa Agrahara Sarguru Hale Mirle Tandere Gayanahalli Honnenahalli Kottayanakoppalu Cummanahalli Natnahalli Hanumanahalli Dodda Vaddaragudi Honnapura Alchanahalli Dodda Hanasoge Kanchinakere Pasupati Kakanahalli Subbayyanakoppalu Kedaga Chiknayakanahalli Adaguru PasupatikoppaluMavanuru Mirle Chikka Vaddaragudi Rajanabilugull Bichanahalli Galigekere Balluru C Koppalu Malnayakanahalli Ganganahalli Arjunahalli KD Kambipura Yaremanuganahalli Koluru Ganganahallikoppalu Chikka Hanasage Kaggala Adaguru Halaganahalli Chennamgere Ganganakuppe Kavalanahalli Bandahalli Kalyanapura Sannegaudanakoppalu Dammanahalli Byalakuppe Suragahalli Hadya Baluru Doddakoppalu Harinahalli Sakkare Dod Kamarhalli Kumarikoppalu Karadipura Nadappanahalli K.R.Nagar Badakanakoppalu Anivalu Meluru Halgegaudankoppalu Baluru Chapparadahalli Sangarashettihalli Maraduru Kanaganahalli Ambalare Dammanahallikoppalu Diddahalli Chunchanakatte Chik Kamarhalli Manchinahalli Maradur Koppalu Mayigaudanahalli
    [Show full text]
  • Reservation for Women in Karnataka Gram Panchayats: the Implications Of
    Reservation for Women in Karnataka Gram Panchayats: The Implications of Non-Random Reservation and the Effect of Women Leaders Janhavi Nilekani Economics Senior Essay Yale College 2010 Acknowledgements: I am grateful to Professors T.N. Srinivasan and Thad Dunning of Yale University for guidance and support throughout this project. A 2008 Democracy and Development Fellowship from the Whitney and Betty MacMillan Center at Yale University enabled me to collect some of the data on government performance. Reservation data collected by Dunning and Nilekani (2009) was extremely helpful. I thank U. A. Vasanth Rao and the Chief Decentralization Analysis Cell of the Gram Swaraj Project for providing fiscal data. Janhavi Nilekani Table of Contents: Abstract 1. Introduction 1.1. Karnataka’s Panchayati Raj 2. Theoretical Background 2.1. Theoretical Support and Criticisms of Political Reservation for Women 2.2. The Impact of Reservation for Women and Minorities in Indian Panchayats 3. Methodological Critique: Non-random Reservation in Indian States. 3.1. Introduction 3.2. Evidence Against Reservation Being Random in All Indian States 3.3. Data Collection 3.4. The Karnataka Panchayati Raj Reservation Process 3.5. Implications of Karnataka’s Reservation Process 3.6. Conclusion: Misestimation of the Effect of Reservation in Previous Research 4. Random Assignment at the Margin of Reservation 4.1. Data Collection 4.2. Empirical Design 4.3. Results and Discussion 5. Conclusion Works Cited Appendix A: Further Details on the Research Design Appendix B: Rural Development and Panchayati Raj Data Independent T-test Results Appendix C: Gram Swaraj Project Fiscal Data Independent T-test Results 2 Janhavi Nilekani Abstract: Do women leaders of Indian village councils govern differently than their male counterparts? The literature finds that the election of women presidents through electoral quotas shifts public goods provision towards female preferences and improves overall governance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rural Working Population of Karnataka State – a Geographical Analysis
    Volume : 4 | Issue : 12 | December 2015 ISSN - 2250-1991 Research Paper Geography The Rural Working Population of Karnataka State – A Geographical Analysis Assistant Professor, Dept. of Geography, Karnatak Science Col- G.N. Kummur lege, Dharwad Karnataka State Professor & Chairman, Dept. of Studies in Geography, Mysore Dr. Nagaraj H. University, Mysore Karnataka State The total geographical area of Karnataka is 1,91,773 sq.kms., which is 5.83% of the total area of India. The total population of Karnataka during 1991 census, Karnataka state had total population of 4,49,77,201. During 2001 census, Karnataka state had total population of 5,28,50,562. The total population of Karnataka can be divided into rural and urban to understand the role of population. During 1991 census, the total rural population in Karnataka was 3,10,69,403 (69.07%), while its total population was 4,49,77,201. During 2001 census, the total rural population increased to 3,48,89,033 (66.01%), while its total population was ABSTRACT 5,28,50,562. During 1991 period the total rural working population in Karnataka was 1,44,31,584 (40%). This rural working population during 2001 census increased to 1,71,27,803 (50%). KEYWORDS Rural, Working Population, Primary, Secondary Workers Introduction A worker is a person whose main activity is participation in 68° 72° 76° 80° 84° 88° 92° 96° any economically productive work by his physical or mental 36° ability. There are contrasting differences in the participation ra- tio of women, children and old people living in rural areas in comparison to urban areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Geography Talukawise Analysis of Main Working Population In
    Volume : 5 | Issue : 3 | March 2016 • ISSN No 2277 - 8179 | IF : 3.508 | IC Value : 69.48 Research Paper Geography Talukawise Analysis of Main Working KEYWORDS : Total Working Population, Main Working Population, Karnataka, Population In Karnataka Talukawise Assistant Professor, Dept. of Geography, Karnatak Science College, Dharwad Karnataka G.N. Kummur State ABSTRACT The total working population of Karnataka can be divided into main workers and marginal workers to under- stand the role of working population. During 1991 census the total population of Karnataka was 4,49,77,201, of which the total workers were 1,88,86,798, which was 41.99% of the total population. The total population of Karnataka during 2001 census was 5,28,50,562, of which the total workers were 2,35,34,791 which was 44.53%. During 1991 census, Karnataka state had 1,72,92,117 main working population (91.55% to the total working population). During 2001 census, Karnataka state had 1,92,64,759 main working population which was 82.28% of the total working population. Introduction Work was defined as participation in any economically produc- Taluka-wise Analysis of Main Working Population in Karnataka tive activity. Such participation could be physical or mental in nature. Work involved not only actual work but also effective su- According to 1991 census, 9 types of working population were pervision and direction of work. It also included unpaid work on recorded. Whereas, during 2001 census, 4 types of working pop- farm or in family enterprise. ulation were observed. For the uniformity of the data 9 class of 1991 census working population is converted into 4 types of According to 2001 census the working population of Karnataka working population (as mentioned in the 2001 census records) is divided into “main workers” and “marginal workers”.
    [Show full text]
  • Census of India 2001 General Population Tables Karnataka
    CENSUS OF INDIA 2001 GENERAL POPULATION TABLES KARNATAKA (Table A-1 to A-4) DIRECTORATE OF CENSUS OPERATIONS KARNATAKA Data Product Number 29-019-2001-Cen.Book (E) (ii) CONTENTS Page Preface v Acknowledgement Vll Figure at a Glance ]X Map relating to Administrative Divisions Xl SECTION -1 General Note 3 Census Concepts and Definitions 11-16 SECTION -2 Table A-I NUMBER OF VILLAGES, TOWNS, HOUSEHOLDS, POPULATION AND AREA Note 18 Diagram regarding Area and percentage to total Area State & District 2001 19 Map relating to Rural and Urban Population by Sex 2001 20 Map relating to Sex ratio 2001 21 Diagram regarding Area, India and States 2001 22 Diagram regarding Population, India and States 2001 23 Diagram regarding Population, State and Districts 2001 24 Map relating to Density of Population 25 Statements 27-68 Fly-Leaf 69 Table A-I (Part-I) 70- 82 Table A-I (Part-II) 83 - 98 Appendix A-I 99 -103 Annexure to Appendix A-I 104 Table A-2 : DECADAL VARIATION IN POPULATION SINCE 1901 Note 105 Statements 106 - 112 Fly-Leaf 113 Table A-2 114 - 120 Appendix A-2 121 - 122 Table A-3 : VILLAGES BY POPULATION SIZE CLASS Note 123 Statements 124 - 128 Fly-Leaf 129 Table A-3 130 - 149 Appendix A-3 150 - 154 (iii) Page Table A-4 TOWNS AND URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS CLASSIFIED BY POPULATION SIZE CLASS IN 2001 WITH VARIATION SINCE 1901 Note 155-156 Diagram regarding Growth of Urban Population showing percentage (1901-2001) 157- 158 Map showing Population of Towns in six size classes 2001 159 Map showing Urban Agglomerations 160 Statements 161-211 Alphabetical list of towns.
    [Show full text]
  • India City Gas Distribution (CGD) Financing AG&P
    Environmental and Social Management Planning AGP City Gas Pvt. Ltd. Framework: India City Gas Distribution (CGD) Financing AG&P Final 9 December 2020 Project No.: 0541083 The business of sustainability Document details The details entered below are automatically shown on the cover and the main page footer. PLEASE NOTE: This table must NOT be removed from this document. Document title Environmental and Social Management Planning Framework: India City Gas Distribution (CGD) Financing AG&P Document subtitle Final Project No. 0541083 Date 9 December 2020 Version 5.0 Author ERM India Private Limited Client Name AGP City Gas Private Limited Document history ERM approval to issue Version Revision Author Reviewed by Name Date Comments Draft 1.0 Nidhi S., and Ajay Pillai Ajay Pillai 04.05.2020 -- Reela M. Draft 2.0 Nidhi S., and Ajay Pillai Ajay Pillai 08.06.2020 Addressal of AIIB Reela M. comments Draft 3.0 Nidhi S., and Ajay Pillai Ajay Pillai 21.07.2020 Addressal of AIIB Reela M. and OeEB comments Final 4.0 Reela M., Ajay Pillai Ajay Pillai 28.10.2020 Addressal of AIIB Karishma S., and OeEB Juhi P. comments Final 5.0 Reela M., Ajay Pillai Ajay Pillai 09.12.2020 Addressal of AIIB Karishma S., comments Juhi P. www.erm.com Version: 5.0 Project No.: 0541083 Client: AGP City Gas Private Limited 9 December 2020 Signature Page 9 December 2020 Environmental and Social Management Planning Framework: India City Gas Distribution (CGD) Financing AG&P Final Name: Ajay Pillai Job title: Partner ERM India Private Limited Building 10A 4th Floor, DLF Cyber City Gurgaon, NCR – 122002 Tel: 91 124 417 0300 Fax: 91 124 417 0301 © Copyright 2020 by ERM Worldwide Group Ltd and / or its affiliates (“ERM”).
    [Show full text]
  • Police Station List
    PS CODE POLOCE STATION NAME ADDRESS DIST CODEDIST NAME TK CODETALUKA NAME 1 YESHWANTHPUR PS BANGALORE 20 BANGALORE 1 Bangalore North 2 JALAHALLI PS BANGALORE 20 BANGALORE 1 Bangalore North 3 RMC YARD PS BANGALORE 20 BANGALORE 1 Bangalore North 4 PEENYA PS BANGALORE 20 BANGALORE 1 Bangalore North 5 GANGAMMAGUDI PS BANGALORE 20 BANGALORE 1 Bangalore North 6 SOLADEVANAHALLI PS BANGALORE 20 BANGALORE 1 Bangalore North 7 MALLESWARAM PS BANGALORE 20 BANGALORE 1 Bangalore North 8 SRIRAMPURAM PS BANGALORE 20 BANGALORE 1 Bangalore North 9 RAJAJINAGAR PS BANGALORE 20 BANGALORE 1 Bangalore North 10 MAHALAXMILAYOUT PS BANGALORE 20 BANGALORE 1 Bangalore North 11 SUBRAMANYANAGAR PS BANGALORE 20 BANGALORE 1 Bangalore North 12 RAJAGOPALNAGAR PS BANGALORE 20 BANGALORE 1 Bangalore North 13 NANDINI LAYOUT PS BANGALORE 20 BANGALORE 1 Bangalore North 14 J C NAGAR PS BANGALORE 20 BANGALORE 1 Bangalore North 15 HEBBAL PS BANGALORE 20 BANGALORE 1 Bangalore North 16 R T NAGAR PS BANGALORE 20 BANGALORE 1 Bangalore North 17 YELAHANKA PS BANGALORE 20 BANGALORE 1 Bangalore North 18 VIDYARANYAPURA PS BANGALORE 20 BANGALORE 1 Bangalore North 19 SANJAYNAGAR PS BANGALORE 20 BANGALORE 1 Bangalore North 20 YELAHANKA NEWTOWN PS BANGALORE 20 BANGALORE 1 Bangalore North 21 CENTRAL PS BANGALORE 20 BANGALORE 2 Bangalore South 22 CHAMARAJPET PS BANGALORE 20 BANGALORE 2 Bangalore South 23 VICTORIA HOSPITAL PS BANGALORE 20 BANGALORE 2 Bangalore South 24 SHANKARPURA PS BANGALORE 20 BANGALORE 2 Bangalore South 25 RPF MANDYA MANDYA 22 MANDYA 5 Mandya 26 HANUMANTHANAGAR PS BANGALORE
    [Show full text]
  • Survey Results
    4 Survey Results 59 5. Survey Results RANKING OF 47 ULBS BASED ON TOTAL SCORE (More than 10 Lakh Population) Part - I: SLP Average PART - III PART - IV Part - II and SS2020 Direct Citizen Overall Total SS2020 Certifications State Name ULB Name League Observation Feedback Score (6000 Rank Total Score Rankings Total Score Total Score M) (1500 M) Total Score (1500 M) (1500 M) (1500 M) Madhya 1 Pradesh Indore 1431.44 1300.00 1500.00 1416.12 5647.56 2 Gujarat Surat 1350.27 1300.00 1500.00 1369.32 5519.59 3 Maharashtra Navi Mumbai 1373.08 1300.00 1467.00 1327.80 5467.89 Andhra 4 Pradesh Vijayawada 1329.09 1100.00 1493.00 1348.23 5270.32 5 Gujarat Ahmedabad 1367.14 1100.00 1498.72 1241.26 5207.13 6 Gujarat Rajkot 1357.01 1300.00 1315.00 1185.35 5157.36 Madhya 7 Pradesh Bhopal 1347.39 1100.00 1474.47 1144.45 5066.31 8 Chandigarh Chandigarh 1144.99 1100.00 1452.77 1272.32 4970.07 Andhra GVMC 9 Pradesh Visakhapatnam 1188.88 1100.00 1468.85 1160.71 4918.44 10 Gujarat Vadodara 1269.20 1100.00 1497.00 1004.13 4870.34 11 Maharashtra Nashik 1332.41 700.00 1441.00 1256.05 4729.46 12 Uttar Pradesh Lucknow 1248.40 700.00 1493.62 1286.26 4728.28 Madhya 13 Pradesh Gwalior 1151.03 1100.00 1177.78 1267.55 4696.36 14 Maharashtra Thane 1170.90 1100.00 1112.00 1223.45 4606.35 15 Maharashtra Pune 1269.61 1100.00 1103.00 1004.70 4477.31 16 Uttar Pradesh Agra 1214.43 500.00 1485.78 1191.30 4391.51 Madhya 17 Pradesh Jabalpur 1294.97 500.00 1261.00 1312.57 4368.55 18 Maharashtra Nagpur 1207.95 500.00 1354.00 1283.11 4345.06 19 Uttar Pradesh Ghaziabad 1069.15 700.00
    [Show full text]
  • April to December
    ANNEXURE-2 LIST OF FACILITIES ELIGIBLE FOR PAYMENT OF INCENTIVES FOR DATA ENTRY IN HMIS / MCTS (APRIL TO DECEMBER - 2013) CRITERIA : 1)HMIS DATA SHOULD BE UPLOADED WITH IN THE DATE OF 5TH 2)FACILITIES SHOULD UPLOAD DATA WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE USER ID 3) TALUK PERFORMANCE IN MCTS ANC REGISTRATION SHOULD BE MORE THAN 70% COMPARED TO HMIS No. Total TALUK Unit SlNo District Sub District PHC NAME User ID Type of Amount PERCENTAG JUL SEP JUN DEC APR OCT AUG NOV MAY Amount mo to pay E IN MCTS 1 Bagalkote Bagalkot BAGALKOTE DISTRICT HOSPITAL nrhm-KA.BK.Bag.DH.BAG DH ü ü 2 400 800 88.72 2 Bagalkote Bagalkot BENNUR (24X7) nrhm-KA.BK.Bag.phc.BEN PHC ü ü 2 400 800 88.72 3 Bagalkote Bagalkot BEWOOR (24X7) nrhm-KA.BK.Bag.phc.BEW PHC ü ü 2 400 800 88.72 4 Bagalkote Bagalkot KALADAGI (24X7) nrhm-KA.BK.Bag.phc.KAL PHC ü ü 2 400 800 88.72 5 Bagalkote Bagalkot RAMPUR (24X7) nrhm-KA.BK.Bag.phc.RAM PHC ü ü 2 400 800 88.72 6 Bagalkote Bagalkot SHIRUR (24X7) nrhm-KA.BK.Bag.phc.SHI PHC ü ü 2 400 800 88.72 7 Bagalkote Bagalkot SUTAGUNDAR (24X7) nrhm-KA.BK.Bag.phc.SUT PHC ü ü 2 400 800 88.72 8 Bagalkote Bilagi (FRU) BILAGI TALUK HOSPITAL nrhm-KA.BK.Bil.SDH.BIL SDH ü ü ü 3 400 1200 105.71 9 Bagalkote Bilagi GIRISAGARA nrhm-KA.BK.Bil.CHC.GIR CHC ü ü ü 3 400 1200 105.71 10 Bagalkote Bilagi GALAGALI (24X7) nrhm-KA.BK.Bil.phc.GAL PHC ü ü 2 400 800 105.71 11 Bagalkote Bilagi KUNDARAGI (24X7) nrhm-KA.BK.Bil.phc.KUN PHC ü ü 2 400 800 105.71 12 Bagalkote Mudhole (FRU) MUDHOL TALUK HOSPITAL nrhm-KA.BK.Mud.SDH.MUD SDH ü ü 2 400 800 82.82 13 Bagalkote Mudhole (FRU) MAHALINGAPUR
    [Show full text]
  • MYSURU, MANDYA and CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICTS N N " " 0 0 ' ± ' 0 0 ° ° 3 3 1 ! Belluru 1 Á! KEY MAP ¤£75
    76°0'0"E 76°10'0"E 76°20'0"E 76°30'0"E 76°40'0"E 76°50'0"E 77°0'0"E 77°10'0"E 77°20'0"E 77°30'0"E 77°40'0"E GEOGRAPHICAL AREA MYSURU, MANDYA AND CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICTS N N " " 0 0 ' ± ' 0 0 ° ° 3 3 1 ! Belluru 1 Á! KEY MAP ¤£75 CA-09 N N " " 0 0 ' NAGAMANGALA ' 0 0 5 5 ° ° 2 !( 2 1 Nagamangala 1 ¤£85 K A R N A T A K A Á! CA-08 KRISHNARAJPET ! Kesthur N CA-13 N " " 0 0 ' M A N D Y A ' 0 Á! MADDUR 0 4 !( 150 A 4 ° Krishnarajpet ° 2 ¤£ 2 1 ¤£47 1 ¤£7 ! Keregodu ! Besagarahalli Á! Á! Total Geographical Area (Sq Km) 16,917 Á! ¤£84 Total Population 58,27,687 CA-12 ! Keelara ! MANDYA Á!( Maddur Total Household 13,54,715 Á! CA-10 No. of Charge Area ! Saligrama Á! 18 ! Holalu PANDAVAPURA ! Budanur ! ! ! ! Gummanahalli ! CA-02 ! GanÁ!dhanahalli !(Á! CHARGE CHARGE N !. Mandya N " " NAME NAME 0 0 ' KRISHNARAJANAGARA Á! ! Doddarasinakere ' 0 !( 0 AREA ID AREA ID 3 PandavapuÁ!ra 3 ° ! Haleyuru ° 2 ! !( 2 1 Á K ! Mellahalli 1 ris Á! Santhekasalagere CA-01 Piriyapatna CA-10 Pandavapura ! Bettadapura hna ! Kennalu ! R Kestur a Á! Á! ja S CA-11 CA-02 Krishnarajanagara CA-11 Shrirangapattana ag !(Á! ara Krishnarajanagara Res SRIRANGAPATNA ! CA-03 Hunsur CA-12 Mandya e Á! ! Halaguru Á! r v ! Á! o !( ! Á i Á! Shrirangapattana Gamanahalli r CA-04 Heggadadevankote CA-13 Maddur CA-01 !( ! ! Arakere Á! Hongalli Á!Palahalli PIRIYAPATNA ! Belagola ! Mahadevapura CA-05 Nanjangud CA-14 Malavalli Á! Á! !( Malavalli ! ¤£117 ! CA-06 Tirumakudal Narsipur CA-15 Kollegal Doddaharve ¤£21 Á! Kirugavalu ! !( !( ! CA-14 N Kattemalalavadi Elwa!(la!( Kesare N CA-07 Mysuru
    [Show full text]
  • Research Paper Spatial Pattern of Rural Main
    Volume : 5 | Issue : 3 | March 2016 ISSN - 2250-1991 | IF : 5.215 | IC Value : 77.65 Research Paper Geography Spatial Pattern of Rural Main Agricultural Labourers in Karnataka : A Geographical Analysis Assistant Professor, Dept. of Geography, Karnatak Science Col- G.N. Kummur lege, Dharwad, Karnataka State The total rural population in Karnataka during 1991 census was 3,10,69,403 (60.07%), while its population was 4,49,77,201. During 2001 census, the total rural population increased to 3,48,89,033 (66.01%), while its total population was 5,28,50,562. During 1991 period the total rural working population in Karnataka was 1,44,31,584 (40%). This rural working population during 2001 census increased to 1,71,27,803 (50%). During 1991 census the rural main agricultural ABSTRACT labourers was 46,42,907 (35.93%). During 2001 census rural main agricultural labourers decreased to 35,50,288 (26.37%). KEYWORDS Rural, Working Population, Male Working Population, Main Agricultural Labourers, Talukawise Introduction The present study is to make taluka-wise analysis of rural main Rural main agricultural labourers were those who had worked agricultural labourers of Karnataka state with its 5 classifica- for the major part of the year i.e. 183 days or more. A per- tion such as rural working population. son who works on another person’s land for wages in money or kind or share is regarded as an agricultural labourer. She/ Methodology he has no risk in the cultivation, but merely works on another The present study is based on secondary data, data collected person’s land for wages.
    [Show full text]
  • Varuna Assembly Karnataka Factbook
    Editor & Director Dr. R.K. Thukral Research Editor Dr. Shafeeq Rahman Compiled, Researched and Published by Datanet India Pvt. Ltd. D-100, 1st Floor, Okhla Industrial Area, Phase-I, New Delhi- 110020. Ph.: 91-11- 43580781-84 Email : [email protected] Website : http://www.indiastatelections.com Online Book Store : www.indiastatpublications.com Report No. : AFB/KA-219-0121 ISBN : 978-93-86370-52-5 First Edition : January, 2018 Third Updated Edition : January, 2021 Price : Rs. 11500/- US$ 310/- © Datanet India Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, mechanical photocopying, photographing, scanning, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of the publisher. Please refer to Disclaimer at page no. 190 for the use of this publication. Printed in India Contents No. Particulars Page No. Introduction 1 Assembly Constituency - (Vidhan Sabha) at a Glance | Features of Assembly 1-2 as per Delimitation Commission of India (2008) Location and Political Maps Location Map | Boundaries of Assembly Constituency - (Vidhan Sabha) in 2 District | Boundaries of Assembly Constituency under Parliamentary 3-10 Constituency - (Lok Sabha) | Town & Village-wise Winner Parties- 2019, 2018, 2014, 2013 and 2009 Administrative Setup 3 District | Sub-district | Towns | Villages | Inhabited Villages | Uninhabited 11-18 Villages | Village Panchayat | Intermediate Panchayat Demographics 4 Population | Households | Rural/Urban Population
    [Show full text]