Differences in Susceptibility to Predation During Nesting Between Pied and Black Stilts (Himantopus Spp.)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Differences in Susceptibility to Predation During Nesting Between Pied and Black Stilts (Himantopus Spp.) DIFFERENCES IN SUSCEPTIBILITY TO PREDATION DURING NESTING BETWEEN PIED AND BLACK STILTS (HIMANTOPUS SPP.) RAYMOND J. PIERCE1 Departmentof Zoology,University of Otago,Dunedin, New Zealand ABSTRACT.--Thenesting success of the Pied Stilt (Himantopushimantopus leucocephalus) and the endangeredBlack Stilt (H. novaezealandiae)was studiedfor three consecutivebreeding seasons(1977-1979) in New Zealand. Black Stilts had a breeding successof lessthan t%, comparedwith over 8% for Pied Stilts. Predation by fetal mammalswas the main causeof nest failure for both species,but the impact was greater on Black Stilts. Direct and indirect evidence (including trapping predators)suggests that these introduced ground predators kill manychicks. Several factors made Black Stilts vulnerable, particularly their nestingalong streambanks that were often frequentedby predators;Pied Stiltsnested in swampswhere predatorswere few. BlackStilt chickstook up to 2 weekslonger to fledgeand their foraging patternsmade them more vulnerablethan Pied Stilt chicks.Other factorsthat possibly increasedpredation risk of BlackStilts include nestingat times of high predatoractivity, solitarynesting, high site fidelity, ineffectivedistraction displays, and lack of a disruptive camouflagepattern in adults.Introduced ground predators probably have contributed great- ly to the declineof BlackStilts. Pied Stiltshave not beenaffected similarly, because their evolutionarypast has included long exposureto groundpredators. Received 27 February1984, acceptedI July 1985. Two speciesof stilts (Recurvirostridae) occur data for most speciesare lacking. In this study in New Zealand: the endemic Black Stilt (Hi- of stilt ecology in South Canterbury, I exam- mantopusnovaezealandiae) and the Pied Stilt (H. ined the nesting successof Pied and Black stilts himantopusleucocephalus), which is the Austral- and comparedtheir susceptibilityto predation. asianrace of the widespreadBlack-winged Stilt. The BlackStilt probably has occurredin New STUDY AREA AND METHODS Zealand for many thousandsof years,but the Pied Stilt is a more recentimmigrant, probably Mostdata were collectedduring three field seasons having arrived in the late 18th or early 19th (1977-1978, 1978-1979, and 1979-1980) in the lower century (Fleming 1962, Pierce 1984a).During 15 km of the CassRiver Valley, LakeTekapo at 710- the 19th century Black Stilts were widespread 850 m (Fig. t). in New Zealand riverbeds and nested at least The study site is a glaciated valley flanked by as far north as central North Island, but they mountains,with tussocks(Festuca spp., Poaspp., and declined rapidly. Since the 1950's a small Chionochloaspp.) and other grassesand small shrubs breeding population has remained only in cen- on the lower slopes.Stilts of both speciesnested in four habitats: riverbed, side streams, ponds, and tral South Island (Pierce 1984a). By contrast, swamps.The riverbed consistedof bare shingle and Pied Stiltshave expandedrecently and are now had braided channelswith widely varying flows common in most types of wetland throughout (mean annual flow was about t0 m•/s). The side New Zealand. streamshad relatively constantflows, and a variety Stilts are ground nesters and are therefore of grassesand other small plants grew on theirbanks. vulnerable to predation by mammals. The in- Muddy ponds were surroundedby grasslandand troduction of carnivorous mammals in the 19th usually containedwater all year. The swampswere century often is claimed to have had a delete- small (<t0 ha), and the dominant plants were Juncus rious effect on New Zealand wildlife, particu- spp. and Carex spp. I previously described some larly forestbirds (e.g. see Moors 1983), but good physicaland biologicalaspects of thesehabitats and the seasonaluse of eachhabitat by stilts and other charadriiformspecies (Pierce 1983). Supplementary data on Black Stilts were collected in the Cass River aPresent address: P.O. Box69, Lake Tekapo,South Valley from 1970 to 1982 and in the neighboring Island, New Zealand. GodleyRiver Valley from 1977 to 1979. 273 The Auk 103:273-280. April 1986 274 RAYMONDJ. PIERCE [Auk,Vol. 103 TABLE1. Breeding successof Pied and Black stilts. Black Stilt Unpro- Pro- Pied Stilt tected tected Total nests 125 27 23 Nest days (N) 1,374 305.5 353 aodley % Total failed nests(F) 49 19 12 Total eggshatched a 260 33 40 CassLake • Total fledged young 69 2 13 RiverTekapo Probability of nest surviving to hatchingb (A) 0.349 0.155 0.367 Probability of egg hatching in a sur- viving nest• (B) 0.903 0.971 0.909 Probability of chick surviving to fledg- ing (C) 0.265 0.061 0.325 Breeding successd 0.084 0.009 0.108 Wamonc ' Mean clutch size of Pied Stilts was 3.8 (range 3- 4); mean clutchsize of BlackStilts was 4.0 (range 3- 6). b(1 - F/N) 29.The duration of egg-layingand in- cubationwas 29 days for both species. "'•• cThe remaining eggswere infertile or addled. a Probabilityof egg producingflying young (= A x Fig. 1. Location of study areas. The main study BxC). area was in the CassRiver Valley. On every sixth day of the breeding seasonI walked Wildlife Service. I found no evidence of mammals the wetland nesting grounds to check whether in- scavengingon desertedstilt eggs.Deserted eggs of dividual pairs were laying, incubating, or guarding stilts (3 clutches)and of other charadriiform species chicks. Other data collected were habitat, substrate, were usually still intact two weeks after having been distanceto water (all after the eggshad hatched),and abandoned. proximityof other nestingstilts. Inevitably somenests To test the hypothesisthat breeding successwould would have been abandoned before I found them, so increaseif predator numberswere reducednear nests, I used the Mayfield (1975) method for calculating I set traps around 23 randomly selectedBlack Stilt breeding success.Because nest checkswere frequent, territories. Gin or Fenn traps were set at intervals of I used the midpoint assumptionrather than the May- 40-90 m (average 60 m) and no closer than 30 m to field -40% method (Miller and Johnson 1978, John- nests.Each trap was placed under a Discariabush or son 1979). Failed nests were examined for evidence covered with a wooden tunnel 30-45 cm long x 20- of the causeof failure. I identified nest predators as 24 cm wide x 16-20 cm high. The traps were baited (1) ferret (Mustelafuro), 13 nestsin which the eggs with rabbit flesh and checkedevery secondday. The were taken whole (no eggshellleft), 10 of which had successof these "protected" Black Stilt nests was ferret footprints leading to or from the nest and 4 of comparedwith 27 Black Stilt nests without traps which had ferret faeces at the nest; (2) feral cat (Felis ("unprotected").In casepredators followed my scent catus),11 nests in which 4-6 large and many small to nests (Bart 1977), I visited only those nests that eggshell fragments were in or near the nest, 6 of could be approached through water. When I was which had catfootprints and 5 of which had catfaeces within 10 m of these nests I recorded the reactions nearby;(3) Norway rat (Rattusnorvegicus), 14 nestsin of the adult birds to my presence,as well as their which very small shell fragmentswere scatteredin nesting stage. Nocturnal observationsof breeding and around the nest, 3 of which had rat footprints behavior were made using an NVC night vision sys- and 2 of which had rat faecesnearby; or (4) Austra- tem with 500-mm lens from a hide or tent 60-200 m lasian Harrier (Circusapproximans), 2 nests in which away. more than half of each eggshellremained in or near To establish chick survival, observations of brood the nest, eachshell with one or two puncturemarks; size were made with a telescopeabout every 10 days 1 nest also had a harrier pellet present. I identified for 9 protectedBlack Stilt broods'and 6 unprotected mammalsigns from the guide of Lawrenceand Brown Black Stilt nests over 3 yr. I abandonedsimilar at- (1973) or with help from staff of the New Zealand temptswith Pied Stilt chicks,because family groups April1986] PredationonStilts 275 were usually closely spacedand therefore easy to T^BLE 2. Cause of nest failure of Pied and Black stilts. confuse. It was not until juvenile Pied Stilts were flying (and lesswary) that family sizescould be es- Side tablished. Adult Pied Stilts were individually rec- stream River Pond Swamp Total ognizable all seasonby their plumage markings Pied Stilt (Pierce 1984b),and many were also banded with in- Total nests 16 24 15 70 125 dividual color combinations. Family parties with Preyedon 5 2 6 11 24 flying youngusually stayed near the nestingarea for Flooded 0 13 0 3 16 a few days at least. To be certain that the correct Other a 3 2 0 4 9 number of young was established,however, I made Black Stilt unprotected more visits than usual to pairs about to fledgeyoung. Total nests 15 2 3 7 27 Preyedon 7 0 3 1 11 Flooded 1 0 0 0 1 Other a 4 1 0 2 7 RESULTS Black Stilt protected BREEDING SUCCESS AND CAUSES OF FAILURE Total nests 13 0 6 4 23 Preyed on 3 0 2 0 5 The breeding successof BlackStilts was much Flooded 3 0 0 0 3 Other a 2 0 1 1 4 lower than that of Pied Stilts (Table I). The probability that an egg present at the begin- a"Other" includesdesertion, damage by stockand ning of incubation would produce a fledgling wind, and unknown causes, some of which could have been predation. was 0.084 for Pied Stilts and 0.009 for unpro- tectedBlack Stilts. Eggsin protectedBlack Stilt nests had a much higher probability of pro- and chick mortality. I had no direct evidence ducing a fledgling (0.108) than those in unpro- of predatorstaking Pied Stilt chicksbut found tected nests. two cases in which Black Stilt chicks were tak- Predation by mammalsand birds accounted en by a ferret and a cat. for 49% of Pied Stilt failures and 64% of Black Indirect evidence of the impact of predators Stilt failures for which the cause was estab- on BlackStilt chickscame from using two pred- lished (Table 2).
Recommended publications
  • Growth Patterns of Hawaiian Stilt Chicks
    Wilson Bull., 11 l(4), 1999, pp. 478487 GROWTH PATTERNS OF HAWAIIAN STILT CHICKS J. MICHAEL REED,,2,8‘ ELIZABETH M. GRAY,334 DIANNE LEWIS3 LEWIS W. ORING,3 RICHARD COLEMAN,5 TIMOTHY BURR,6 AND PETER LUSCOMB7 ABSTRACT-We studied chick growth and plumage patterns in the endangered Hawaiian Stilt (Himantopus mexicanus knudseni). Body mass of captive chicks closely fit a Gompertz growth curve, revealing a growth coefficient (K) of 0.065 day- ’ and point of inflection (T) of 17 days. When chicks fledged about 28 days after hatching, they weighed only 60% of adult body mass; at 42 d, birds still were only 75% of adult mass; culmen, tarsus, and wing chord at fledging also were less than adult size. This trend of continued growth to adult size after fledging is typical for most shorebirds. After hatching, captive chicks grew more rapidly than wild chicks, probably because of an unlimited food supply. We found no evidence for adverse effects of weather on the growth of wild chicks. As with other shorebirds, the tarsus started relatively long, with culmen and then wing chord growing more rapidly in later development. Tarsal and wing chord growth were sigmoidal, whereas culmen growth was linear. We describe plumage characteristics of weekly age classes of chicks to help researchers age birds in the wild. Received 28 Dec. 1998, accepted 20 April 1999. Avian growth patterns have been studied (Himantopus mexicanus knudseni), a precocial primarily because of their relationships to the bird that is an endangered subspecies of the ecology and evolutionary history of different Black-necked Stilt.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Predation by Introduced Mammals on Endemic Shorebirds in New Zealand: a Conservation Perspective
    Biological Conservation 99 (2001) 47±64 www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon The impact of predation by introduced mammals on endemic shorebirds in New Zealand: a conservation perspective John E. Dowding a,*, Elaine C. Murphy b aPO Box 36-274, Merivale, Christchurch 8030, New Zealand bScience and Research Unit, Department of Conservation, Private Bag 4715, Christchurch, New Zealand Abstract The avifauna of New Zealand has been severely depleted since human colonisation and currently contains a disproportionately high number of threatened species. Of the 23 threatened shorebird species worldwide, six are endemic to New Zealand. We review the status of New Zealand's endemic shorebirds and examine the impact on them of various threats, particularly predation by introduced mammals. The conservation status of the 10 extant species (three oystercatchers, one stilt, four plovers and two snipe) is outlined and the factors that predisposed them to predation by introduced mammals are summarised. Individual species accounts are presented, including data on population trends, known or suspected impacts of predation, identi®cation of important predator species, other threats, and conservation measures currently in place or required. One species and two subspecies are extinct, three species are con®ned to predator-free islands and another is found only on the Chatham Islands group. Six survive on the mainland but three have declined to varying degrees and are assigned threatened status by Collar et al. (1994). Only one plover and two oystercatchers are still relatively numerous and/or widespread. Rats, cats and mustelids have had the greatest overall impacts. Conservation measures in place to mitigate the eects of introduced predators include the formulation of recovery plans, predator control around breeding areas, captive breeding and rearing programmes and the founding of new populations by translocation.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand Comprehensive III 16Th November – 2Nd December 2017 Trip Report
    New Zealand Comprehensive III 16th November – 2nd December 2017 Trip Report Gibson’s Wandering Albatross off Kaikoura by Erik Forsyth Trip Report compiled by Tour Leader Erik Forsyth Rockjumper Birding Tours | New Zealand www.rockjumperbirding.com Trip Report – RBL New Zealand - Comprehensive III 2017 2 Daily Diary New Zealand is a must for the serious seabird enthusiast. Not only will you see a variety of albatrosses, petrels and shearwaters, but there are good chances of getting out on the high seas and finding something unusual. Seabirds dominate this tour, and views of most birds are right alongside the boat. There are also several land birds which are unique to these islands: the kiwis – terrestrial nocturnal inhabitants; the huge swamp-hen like takahe – prehistoric in its looks and movements; and then the wattlebirds (the saddlebacks and kokako) – poor flyers with short wings, which bound along the branches and on the ground. We had so many highlights on this tour, including close encounters with Little Spotted Kiwi, walk-away views of a pair of North Island Kokako, both North and South Island Saddlebacks and a pair of the impressive South Island Takahe. With many boat trips, the pelagic list was long, with Wandering, Northern and Southern Royal, Salvin’s, Black-browed, Campbell and White-capped Albatrosses, Westland, Cook’s and White- chinned Petrels, Buller’s, Flesh-footed and New Zealand (Red-breasted) Plover by Erik Forsyth Hutton’s Shearwaters, and Common Diving Petrel being a few of the highlights. Other major highlights included twelve New Zealand King Shag, a pair of Blue Duck with one chick, nine of the critically endangered Black Stilt, the rare Stitchbird, New Zealand Kaka, the entertaining Kea, range- restricted New Zealand Rockwren, the tiny Rifleman and lastly the striking Yellowhead, to name a few.
    [Show full text]
  • West Papua Expedition
    The fabulous Spangled Kookaburra was one of the many highlights (Mark Van Beirs) WEST PAPUA EXPEDITION 22/28 OCTOBER – 10 NOVEMBER 2019 LEADER: MARK VAN BEIRS 1 BirdQuest Tour Report: West Papua Expedition www.birdquest-tours.com The cracking Kofiau Paradise Kingfisher posed ever so well (Mark Van Beirs) This unusual trip was set up to fill in some of the remaining gaps in the Birdquest New Guinea lifelist, so the plan was to visit several hard to reach venues in West Papua. The pre-trip was aiming to climb to the top of 2 BirdQuest Tour Report: West Papua Expedition www.birdquest-tours.com Mount Trikora in the Snow Mountains, but because of recent rioting and civil unrest (whereby several dozen people had been killed), access to the town of Wamena was totally denied to foreign visitors by the authorities. So, sadly, no Snow Mountain Robin… We did manage to visit the famous Wasur National Park, which produced the fantastic Spangled Kookaburra and Grey-crowned and Black Mannikins (all Birdquest lifers) and we reached the island of Kofiau, where the fabulous Kofiau Paradise Kingfisher and the modestly- plumaged Kofiau Monarch (two more Birdquest lifers) showed extremely well. The fabulous lowland rainforest site of Malagufuk gave us a long list of exquisite species amongst which a truly impressive Northern Cassowary, a cute Wallace’s Owlet-nightjar, a sublime Papuan Hawk-Owl and a tremendous Red- breasted Paradise Kingfisher stood out. Kingfishers especially performed extremely well on this tour as we saw no fewer than 15 species, including marvels like Hook-billed, Common Paradise, Blue-black, Beach, Yellow-billed and Papuan Dwarf Kingfishers and Blue-winged and Rufous-bellied Kookaburras.
    [Show full text]
  • Order CHARADRIIFORMES: Waders, Gulls and Terns Family
    Text extracted from Gill B.J.; Bell, B.D.; Chambers, G.K.; Medway, D.G.; Palma, R.L.; Scofield, R.P.; Tennyson, A.J.D.; Worthy, T.H. 2010. Checklist of the birds of New Zealand, Norfolk and Macquarie Islands, and the Ross Dependency, Antarctica. 4th edition. Wellington, Te Papa Press and Ornithological Society of New Zealand. Pages 191 & 211-212. Order CHARADRIIFORMES: Waders, Gulls and Terns The family sequence of Christidis & Boles (1994), who adopted that of Sibley et al. (1988) and Sibley & Monroe (1990), is followed here. Family RECURVIROSTRIDAE Bonaparte: Stilts and Avocets Subfamily RECURVIROSTRINAE Bonaparte: Stilts and Avocets Recurvirostrinae Bonaparte, 1831: Saggio dist. Metodica Anim. Vert.: 59 – Type genus Recurvirostra Linnaeus, 1758. Genus Himantopus Brisson Himantopus Brisson, 1760: Ornithologie 1: 46, 5: 33 – Type species (by tautonymy) Charadrius himantopus Linnaeus = Himantopus himantopus (Linnaeus). Hypsibates Nitzsch, 1827: in Ersch & Gruber, Allgem. Ency. Wiss. Künste 16: 150 – Type species (by monotypy) Charadrius himantopus Linnaeus = Himantopus himantopus (Linnaeus). Himantopus himantopus (Linnaeus) Pied Stilt Charadrius Himantopus Linnaeus, 1758: Syst. Nat., 10th edition 1: 151 – southern Europe. Almost cosmopolitan, five subspecies recognised. Himantopus himantopus leucocephalus Gould Pied Stilt Himantopus leucocephalus Gould, 1837: Synop. Birds Australia 2: pl. 34 (fide McAllan 2004, Notornis 51: 127) – New South Wales, Australia. Himantopus albus Ellman, 1861: Zoologist 19: 7470 – New Zealand. Himantopus picatus Ellman, 1861: Zoologist 19: 7470 – New Zealand. Himantopus albicollis Buller, 1875: Trans. Proc. N.Z. Inst. 7: 224 – Orari, Canterbury. Junior primary homonym of Himantopus albicollis Vieillot, 1817. Himantopus seebohmi picata Ellman; Hartert 1891, Kat. Vogel. Mus. Senckenb. Natur. Gesell. Frankfurt Main: 220.
    [Show full text]
  • The Maintenance and Reproductive Behaviour of Black Stilts
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the pennission of the Author. The Maintenance and Reproductive Behaviour of Black Stilts (Himantopus novaezealandiae) in Captivity, and Implications for the Management of this Rare Species. A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Zoology at Massey University Christine Elva Margaret Reed February 1986 ii ABSTRACT In an effort to conserve New Zealand's rarest endemic wading species, the black stilt (Himantopus novaezealandiae), eggs were removed from the wild in October 1979 for establishment of a captive breeding population. Eight chicks fledged following artificial incubation and hand-rearing at the National Wildlife Centre near Masterton. At two years of age, these tentatively sexed stilts were formed into pairs and housed in large outdoor enclosures. I studied their behaviour from December 1982 until February 1986, aiming to i) collate an ethogram for the species under the restrictions of a captive environment ii) describe and quantify behavioural activity, especially that of reproductive behaviour and breeding biology iii) describe vocalisations and iv) on the basis of observed behaviour, examine captive breeding as a management option for black stilts. A repertoire of 38 context-specific behavioural patterns were observed throughout the year and a further 15 stereo-typed species-typical nest-building, copulatory, incubation and chick-rearing patterns occurred during the breeding season. Time-budget analysis of a focal pair of stilts showed foraging and immobility to be the predominant daily activities, peaking during the pre-nesting period.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wrybill Newsletter of the Canterbury Region, Ornithological Society of New Zealand
    The Wrybill Newsletter of the Canterbury Region, Ornithological Society of New Zealand Regional representative: Jan Walker 305 Kennedys Bush Road, Christchurch 8025 Ph 03 322 7187. Email: [email protected] January 2010 Droppings from the Regional Rep him anyway. It was richly deserved. The Ashley/Rakahuri Group also won the Wondering where to start, why not the partiest Canterbury/Aoraki Conservation Award for 2009. party of the bird calendar for OSNZ Canterbury? This is of course the Xmas BBQ at Colin and There are some good outings planned for this Cherry’s Fenland House farm. Around 15 folk year, so do come along even if you haven’t done rose to the occasion. Five teams went out so in the past. We are a friendly lot and not at all around the lake before lunch and two later on, competitive, well perhaps a little…… much later on, to mop up the left-overs. Nothing exceptional was seen except 3 Bitterns and a Some excellent evening meetings took place at small colony of nesting Caspian Terns, neither of the end of last year. Sara Kross, studying which are waders, unfortunately. The event Falcons in a Marlborough vineyard, had a continues to be one of Canterbury’s finest, fascinating video record of the birds to show rivaling the Show, Cup Week and an All-Black their lives in detail. She asked for small-bird Test, put together. If that didn’t get you reading experts to help her identify the prey items shown this, I give up. in the film, not that there was much left to see.
    [Show full text]
  • BLACK STILT RECOVERY PLAN (Himantopus Novaezealandiae)
    THREATENED SPECIES RECOVERY PLAN SERIES NO.4 BLACK STILT RECOVERY PLAN (Himantopus novaezealandiae) Prepared by C.E.M. Reed & D.P. Murray Department of Conservation, Twizel Field Centre Private Bag, Twizel D. J. Butler Department of Conservation, Threatened Species Unit P.O. Box 10-420, Wellington for the Threatened Species Unit Threatened Species Unit Department of Conservation P.O. Box 10-420 Wellington NEW ZEALAND February 1993 ISSN 1170-3806 ISBN 0-478-01459-7 Threatened Species Recovery Plan Series No.4 Keywords: recovery plan, black stilt, Himantopus novaezealandiae, Mackenzie Basin, South Canterbury Frontispiece: Black stilt at the nest. Photo: Dave Murray. CONTENTS 1 ABSTRACT The black stilt is one of the world's rarest wading birds. There has been active management by the NZ Wildlife Service and Department of Conservation since 1984 when the winter population comprised 32 adults. The most recent winter count recorded 52 adults in the wild (July 1992) and there were then a further 32 in captivity. The birds breed only on the braided riverbeds of the Mackenzie Basin, South Canterbury, though last century they bred in both the North and South Islands. The decline of the species was probably largely the result of predation by introduced mammals, but habitat loss and hybridisation with pied stilt have been contributing factors. Management of black stilt has and will continue to centre on the protection of eggs and chicks from loss due to predation or river flooding. Trapping of predators will be carried out in priority areas, and all eggs will be taken for artificial incubation and returned to adults at hatching.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Status of New Zealand Birds, 2008
    Notornis, 2008, Vol. 55: 117-135 117 0029-4470 © The Ornithological Society of New Zealand, Inc. Conservation status of New Zealand birds, 2008 Colin M. Miskelly* Wellington Conservancy, Department of Conservation, P.O. Box 5086, Wellington 6145, New Zealand [email protected] JOHN E. DOWDING DM Consultants, P.O. Box 36274, Merivale, Christchurch 8146, New Zealand GRAEME P. ELLIOTT Research & Development Group, Department of Conservation, Private Bag 5, Nelson 7042, New Zealand RODNEY A. HITCHMOUGH RALPH G. POWLESLAND HUGH A. ROBERTSON Research & Development Group, Department of Conservation, P.O. Box 10420, Wellington 6143, New Zealand PAUL M. SAGAR National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research, P.O. Box 8602, Christchurch 8440, New Zealand R. PAUL SCOFIELD Canterbury Museum, Rolleston Ave, Christchurch 8001, New Zealand GRAEME A. TAYLOR Research & Development Group, Department of Conservation, P.O. Box 10420, Wellington 6143, New Zealand Abstract An appraisal of the conservation status of the post-1800 New Zealand avifauna is presented. The list comprises 428 taxa in the following categories: ‘Extinct’ 20, ‘Threatened’ 77 (comprising 24 ‘Nationally Critical’, 15 ‘Nationally Endangered’, 38 ‘Nationally Vulnerable’), ‘At Risk’ 93 (comprising 18 ‘Declining’, 10 ‘Recovering’, 17 ‘Relict’, 48 ‘Naturally Uncommon’), ‘Not Threatened’ (native and resident) 36, ‘Coloniser’ 8, ‘Migrant’ 27, ‘Vagrant’ 130, and ‘Introduced and Naturalised’ 36. One species was assessed as ‘Data Deficient’. The list uses the New Zealand Threat Classification System, which provides greater resolution of naturally uncommon taxa typical of insular environments than the IUCN threat ranking system. New Zealand taxa are here ranked at subspecies level, and in some cases population level, when populations are judged to be potentially taxonomically distinct on the basis of genetic data or morphological observations.
    [Show full text]
  • Kiwi (Apteryx Spp.) Recovery Plan
    Recovery plans A recovery group has been established for kiwi. This group consists of people with knowledge of the ecology and management needs of the species. The role of the recovery group is to achieve recovery of the species they represent through generation and provision of high-quality technical advice. The recovery group prepared this plan in conjunction with people interested in or affected by this plan, or with an expert knowledge of the species. Drafts have been sent to relevant Conservation Boards for comment and to people or organisations with an interest in conservation management of kiwi. Changes to the plan were made as a result of that consultation. The recovery group will review progress in implementation of this plan and will recommend to Department of Conservation managers any changes that may be required in management. Comments and suggestions regarding conservation of kiwi are welcome and should be directed to the Kiwi Recovery Group via any office of the Department or to the Manager, Biodiversity Recovery Unit, PO Box 10-420, Wellington. The recovery planning process provides opportunities for further consultation between the Department, tangata whenua and others regarding management of this species. Those interested in being more involved in management of kiwi or in receiving information should also contact the recovery group. The Central Regional General Manager of the Department formally approved this plan in 2003. A review of the plan is due in 2006, or sooner if new information or technology leads to a significant change in management direction. This plan will remain operative until a new plan has been prepared and approved, or become redundant if recovery is achieved and management effort enters a ‘maintenance phase’.
    [Show full text]
  • Trip Report January 6 – 24, 2019 | Written by Client Karen Worcester
    New Zealand Birding & Nature | Trip Report January 6 – 24, 2019 | Written by Client Karen Worcester With Guide Greg Smith, and participants Karen, Fiona, Kay, Lesley, Kit, Elena, Jan, and Linda Sun., January 6 | North to Hauraki Gulf Welcome to New Zealand! Some of us met yesterday while getting to know Auckland a little better, and were happy to meet Mark Ayre, our New Zealand guide. We gathered in the lobby of the Grand Millennium Hotel, and then out we went to the comfy Mercedes bus we’d be calling home for the next few weeks. We left Auckland and drove south towards Mangere. Along the freeways here and in other open spaces, restoration plantings of native plants are common, and include New Zealand flax, cabbage tree (Cordyline, reminiscent of Dracaena), putokahwa (or New Zealand Christmas Tree) and toi toi (Austroderia - looks somewhat like pampas grass). The area is dominated by small volcanic peaks, often covered with lush vegetation. Some of the small volcanoes near the coast were used by the Maori as lookouts. Their sides still show the remnants of war trenches they used for cover. We drove along the south edge of Mangere Bay, out onto a causeway towards Puketutu Island. Wastewater ponds parallel the causeway on one side, with tidal mud flats on the other - this made for excellent views of shorebirds and waterfowl. Elegant Black Swans floated in the ponds, along with Mallard/Grey Duck hybrids. Welcome Swallows flew overhead, welcoming us to the first morning of our trip. As always, the first morning of the first day is a rush of new species.
    [Show full text]
  • Of the Inner Hauraki Gulf
    34 N.l. ECOLOGICAL SOCIETY Some Notes on the Sea-Birds and Shore-Birds of the Inner Hauraki Gulf R. B. Sibson The narrow isthmus on which Auckland catcher (Haemutopus reischeki) now nest- stands, deeply penetrated by creeks and in- ing within fifty miles of Auckland are very lets, and the inner Hauraki Gulf with its small but a few breeding pairs linger on many islands and estuaries, are frequented quiet stretches of beach. Otherwise the bird by great numbers of shore-birds and sea- life of the coast remains rich. Some species, birds, both for breeding and feeding. The notably black-backed and red-bi1led gulls, region under discussion is situated-between the pied stilt and probably the white-faced other areas which are well-known for the heron have benefitted from pakeha civilisa- richness of their bird life. Manukau Har- tion. By scavenging on man's waste the gulls bour, to the south-west, and the Firth of appear to be surviving the winter in greater Thames, to the south-east, are unrivalled in numbers than formerly. Even so there is New Zealand for the number and variety of still a heavy mortality of young black-backed waders (charadriiformes) which feed on gulls in their first autumn, many evidently the eutrophic ooze of their tidal flats. To dying of starvation when left to fend for the north are the numerous outer islands themselves. Despite scavenging, the popula- of the Hauraki Gulf on which besides pen- tion seems to have. outstripped the food guins, gulls, terns, shags and gannets, twelve supply.
    [Show full text]