Appendix I Landscape and Visual Appraisal, prepared by FPCR

gva.co.uk

Trebor Developments LLP

White Hill, Kinver

LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL APPRAISAL

24 February 2017

FPCR Environment and Design Ltd Registered Office: Lockington Hall, Lockington, Derby DE74 2RH Company No. 07128076. [T] 01509 672772 [F] 01509 674565 [E] [email protected] [W] www.fpcr.co.uk

This report is the property of FPCR Environment and Design Ltd and is issued on the condition it is not reproduced, retained or disclosed to any unauthorised person, either wholly or in part without the written consent of FPCR Environment and Design Ltd. Ordnance Survey material is used with permission of The Controller of HMSO, Crown copyright 100018896.

Rev Issue Status Prepared / Date Approved/Date

Draft IDR 17/2/17 MGH/19/2/17 Rev A MGH 24/2/17 MGH 24/2/17

White Hill, Kinver - Landscape & Visual Appraisal fpcr

CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION ...... 2

2.0 METHODOLOGY ...... 3

3.0 PLANNING POLICY ...... 6

4.0 BASELINE CONDITIONS ...... 10

5.0 LANDSCAPE PROPOSALS ...... 19

6.0 LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL EFFECTS ...... 20

7.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ...... 26

FIGURES

Figure 1: Site Location Plan

Figure 2: Landscape Character

Figure.3: Topography Plan

Figure 4: Aerial Photograph

Figure 5: Visual Appraisal

Figure 6: Photo Viewpoints

APPENDICES

Appendix A: LVIA Methodology & Assessment Criteria

Appendix B: Landscape Effects Table

Appendix C: Visual Effects Table

Appendix D: Sketch Appraisal Plans 1244-12 Rev A & B and 1244 - 02

J:\7600\7686\LANDS\LVIA\7686 LVA Report.docx 1 White Hill, Kinver - Landscape & Visual Appraisal fpcr

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 This Landscape and Visual Appraisal (LVA) has been carried out for the proposed development allocation by FPCR Environment and Design Ltd (FPCR). The purpose of this LVA study is to provide an assessment of the likely landscape and visual effects of the proposed development site. The landscape and visual effects have been considered in relation to the indicative proposals detailed in the Sketch Appraisals 1244-12 Rev A & B and 1244 - 02 (Refer to Appendix D).

1.2 FPCR are a multi-disciplinary environmental and design consultancy with over 50 years’ experience of architecture, landscape, ecology, urban design, masterplanning and environmental impact assessment. The practice is a member of the Landscape Institute and Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment and are frequently called upon to provide expert evidence on landscape and visual issues at Public and Local Plan Inquiries.

Site Location

1.3 The site is situated on land to the south of White Hill along the western settlement edge of Kinver, a large village in South Staffordshire.

1.4 Figure 1 shows the location and context of the site.

Proposed Development

1.5 The proposal is for a residential development of 30 dwellings (Area A 3.57 acres shown on Sketch Appraisal 1244-12 Rev A) on land with a draft allocation, incorporating areas of public open space and structural landscape planting.

1.6 A second option is also considered in this LVIA showing an increased area of development which would yield up to 57 dwellings and would include comprehensive green infrastructure (Area A 6.57 acres shown on Sketch Appraisal 1244-12 Rev B).

1.7 A third option showing Approximately 100 dwellings is shown on drawing 122 – 02.

J:\7600\7686\LANDS\LVIA\7686 LVA Report.docx 2 White Hill, Kinver - Landscape & Visual Appraisal fpcr

2.0 METHODOLOGY

2.1 This LVA has been prepared based upon the Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment, third edition (GLVIA3), published by the Landscape Institute and the Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment, in 2013.

2.2 In summary the GVLIA3 states:

“Landscape and Visual impact assessment (LVIA), is a tool used to identify and assess the significance of and the effects of change resulting from development on both landscape as an environmental resource in its own right and on people’s views and visual amenity.”

2.3 There are two components of LVIA:

 Assessment of landscape effects; assessing effects on the landscape as a resource in its own right;

 Assessment of visual effects: assessing effects on specific views and on the general visual amenity experienced by people.

2.4 The components of this report include: baseline studies; description and details of the landscape proposals and mitigation measures to be adopted as part of the scheme; identification and description of likely effects arising from the proposed development; and an assessment of the significance of these effects.

2.5 In terms of baseline studies the assessment provides an understanding of the landscape in the area to be affected, its constituent elements, character, condition and value. For the visual baseline this includes an understanding of the area in which the development may be visible, the people who may experience views, and the nature of views.

Assessment of Landscape Effects

2.6 GLVIA3 states that “An assessment of landscape effects deals with the effects of change and development on landscape as a resource”. The baseline landscape is described by reference to existing landscape character assessments and by a description of the site and its context.

2.7 A range of landscape effects can arise through development. These can include:

 Change or loss of elements, features, aesthetic or perceptual aspects that contribute to the character and distinctiveness of the landscape

 Addition of new elements that influence character and distinctiveness of the landscape

 Combined effects of these changes

2.8 The characteristics of the existing landscape resource are considered in respect of the susceptibility of the landscape resource to the change arising from this development. The value of the existing landscape is also considered.

2.9 Each effect on landscape receptors is assessed in terms of size or scale, geographical extent of the area influenced and its duration and reversibility. In terms of size or scale, the judgement takes account of the extent of the existing landscape elements that will be lost or changed, and the degree to which the aesthetic or perceptual aspects or key characteristics of the landscape will be altered by removal or addition of new elements.

J:\7600\7686\LANDS\LVIA\7686 LVA Report.docx 3 White Hill, Kinver - Landscape & Visual Appraisal fpcr

2.10 The overall landscape effect is determined by considering the sensitivity of the landscape receptors and the magnitude of effect on the landscape. Final conclusions on the overall landscape effects are drawn from the assessment components described.

2.11 This appraisal describes the nature of the landscape effects. The criteria used in the appraisal are set out in Appendix A.

Assessment of Visual Effects

2.12 An assessment of visual effects deals with the effects of change and development on the views available to people and their visual amenity.

2.13 The first stage in the assessment is to map approximate visibility. This can be done by a computer Zone of Theoretical Visibility (ZTV), or by manual methods, using map study and field evaluation. A series of viewpoints are included within the assessment that are representative of views towards the site from surrounding visual receptors. Other views of the site are included where it supports the description and understanding of the site`s landscape and visual characteristics.

2.14 The views also typically represent what can be seen from a variety of distances from the development and different viewing experiences.

2.15 It is important to remember that visual receptors are all people. For each affected viewpoint, the assessment considers both susceptibility to change in views and the value attached to views. The visual receptors most susceptible to change are generally likely to include:

 residents at home

 people engaged in outdoor recreation, including use of public rights of way, whose attention or interest is likely to be focused on the landscape or particular views;

 visitors to heritage assets or other attractions, where views of surroundings are an important contributor to the experience;

 communities where views contribute to the landscape setting enjoyed by residents in the area.

2.16 Travellers on road, rail or other transport routes tend to fall into an intermediate category of susceptibility to change. Where travel involves recognised scenic routes awareness of views is likely to be particularly high.

2.17 Visual receptors likely to be less sensitive to change include:

 People engaged in outdoor sport or recreation which does not involve or depend upon appreciation of views of the landscape;

 People at their place of work whose attention may be focused on their work or activity, not on their surroundings.

2.18 Each of the visual effects is evaluated in terms of its size or scale, the geographical extent of the area influenced and its duration or reversibility.

2.19 In terms of size or scale, the magnitude of visual effects takes account of:

 The scale of the change in the view with respect to the loss or addition of features in the view and changes in its composition, including proportion of the view occupied by the proposed development;

J:\7600\7686\LANDS\LVIA\7686 LVA Report.docx 4 White Hill, Kinver - Landscape & Visual Appraisal fpcr

 The degree of contrast or integration of any new features or changes in the landscape with the existing or remaining landscape elements and characteristics in terms of form, scale and mass, line height, colour and texture;

 The nature of the view of the proposed development, in terms of the relative amount of time over which it will be experienced and whether views will be full, partial or glimpses.

2.20 The geographical extent of the visual effect in each viewpoint is likely to reflect:

 The angle of view in relation to the main activity of the receptor

 The distance of the viewpoint from the proposed development

 The extent of the area over which the changes would be visible.

2.21 As with landscape effects, the duration of the effect could be short to long term or permanent and the same definitions apply. The criteria used in this appraisal are included at Appendix A.

Overall Landscape and Visual Effects

2.22 The final conclusions on effects, whether adverse or beneficial, are drawn from the separate judgements on the sensitivity of the receptors and the magnitude of the effects. This overall judgement involves a reasoned professional overview of the individual judgements against the criteria, to then make the overall judgement.

2.23 For this appraisal, the following descriptive thresholds have been used with regard to effects:-

 Major: An effect that will fundamentally change and be in direct contrast to the existing landscape or views;

 Moderate: An effect that will markedly change the existing landscape or views but may retain or incorporate some characteristics/ features currently present;

 Minor: An effect that will entail limited or localised change to the existing landscape/ views or will entail more noticeable localised change but including both adverse and beneficial effects and is likely to retain or incorporate some characteristics/ features currently present;

 Negligible: An effect that will be discernible yet of very limited change to the existing landscape or views.

J:\7600\7686\LANDS\LVIA\7686 LVA Report.docx 5 White Hill, Kinver - Landscape & Visual Appraisal fpcr

3.0 PLANNING POLICY

National Planning Policy

National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF, 2012)

3.1 The NPPF sets out the Government’s planning polices for England and how these are expected to be applied. At the heart of the NPPF is the presumption in the favour of sustainable development. Paragraph 6 states:

“The purpose of the planning system is to contribute to the achievement of sustainable development.”

3.2 The three dimensions to delivering sustainable development are: economic, social and environmental.

 “an environmental role - contributing to protecting and enhancing our natural, built and historic environment; and, as part of this, helping to improve biodiversity, use natural resources prudently, minimise waste and pollution, and mitigate and adapt to climate change including moving to a low carbon economy.” (para 7)

3.3 The core planning principles include the following:

 “always seek to secure high quality design and a good standard of amenity for all existing and future occupants of land and buildings”;

 take account of the different roles and character of different areas, promoting the vitality of our main urban areas, protecting the Green Belts around them, recognising the intrinsic character and beauty of the countryside and supporting thriving rural communities within it” (para 17)

3.4 The NPPF supports good design to enhance the quality of the built and natural environment.

 “The Government attaches great importance to the design of the built environment. Good design is a key aspect of sustainable development, is indivisible from good planning, and should contribute positively to making places better for people” (para 56)

3.5 “Planning polices and decisions should aim to ensure that development:

 Establishes a strong sense of place, using streetscapes and buildings to create attractive and comfortable places to live, work and visit;

 Optimise the potential of the site to accommodate development, create and sustain an appropriate mix of uses (including incorporation of green and other public space as part of developments) and support local facilities and transport networks;

 Respond to local character and history, and reflect the identity of local surroundings and materials, while not preventing or discouraging appropriate innovation; and

 Are visually attractive as a result of good architecture and appropriate landscaping.” (para 58)

3.6 The NPPF seeks to conserve and enhance the natural environment – protecting and enhancing valued landscapes, and affording great weight to the protection of areas of natural and scenic beauty, such as National Parks, the Broads and Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

J:\7600\7686\LANDS\LVIA\7686 LVA Report.docx 6 White Hill, Kinver - Landscape & Visual Appraisal fpcr

“The planning system should contribute to and enhance the natural and local environment by:

Protecting and enhancing valued landscapes, geological conservation interests and soils’” (para

109)

“Local planning authorities should set criteria based policies against which proposals for a development on or affecting protected wildlife or geodiversity sites or landscape areas will be judged. Distinctions should be made between the hierarchy of international, national and locally designated sites so that protection is commensurate with their status and gives appropriate weight to their importance and the contribution that they make to wider ecological networks.” (para 113)

“Local planning authorities should:

Set out a strategic approach in their Local Plans, planning positively for the creation, protection, enhancement and management of networks of biodiversity and green infrastructure;” (para 114)

National Planning Practice Guidance (NPPG, 2014)

3.7 The NPPG came into force on the 6th March 2014 and is an online planning resource which provides guidance on the NPPF and the planning system. The NPPF continues to be the primary document for decision making.

Local Planning Policy

A Local Plan for South Staffordshire: Core Strategy DPD (Adopted 2012)

3.8 The following policies are of relevance to landscape and visual matters and the proposed development:

Core Policy 2: Protecting and Enhancing the Natural and Historic Environment

Core Policy 3: Sustainable Development and Climate Change

Core Policy 4: Promoting High Quality Design

Policy OC1: Development in the Open Countryside Beyond the West Midlands Green Belt

Policy EQ1: Protecting, Enhancing and Expanding Natural Assets

Policy EQ4: Protecting and Enhancing the Character and Appearance of the Landscape

Policy EQ12: Landscaping

J:\7600\7686\LANDS\LVIA\7686 LVA Report.docx 7 White Hill, Kinver - Landscape & Visual Appraisal fpcr

Emerging Site Allocations Document The Publication Plan January 2017

3.9 The SAD, once adopted, will set out site specific proposals and policies for the use of land to guide future development, in order to help deliver the vision and objectives of the Core Strategy.

3.10 This is a consultation document which represents the Council’s final draft plan before it is sent to the Secretary of State.

3.11 The following policies are of relevance to landscape and visual matters and the proposed development:

Policy SAD2: The Housing Allocations

3.12 The northern section of the site has been strategically allocated for residential development to meet the housing needs of Kinver settlement, described as Kinver (a) Site Ref 274 Land South of White Hill, with a minimum dwelling delivery of 30 units.

Policy SAD3: Safeguarded Land for Longer Term Development Needs

3.13 The southern section of the site has been strategically allocated for Safeguarded Land as Kinver (b) Site Ref 274 Land South of White Hill, 3.9ha. This safeguarded land will be retained for longer term development needs to meet the Core Strategy plan requirements.

Policy SAD6 Green Belt, Open Countryside and Development Boundary Amendments

3.14 In order to facilitate the above strategic allocation, the site area has been taken out of the Green Belt Designation and the Settlement Boundary of Kinver amended as appropriate.

3.15 The following SAD policies are also considered relevant with regard to new developments;

Policy SAD7: Open Space Standards

Policy SAD9: Key Development Requirements

 Design & Access

 Historic Environment

 Open Space, Green Infrastructure & Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SUDs)

Other Relevant Strategies, Guidelines or Documents

Village Design Guide SPD South Staffordshire Council (2009)

3.16 This sets out the detailed considerations which the Council expects applicants and developers to take into account in the design of new developments. It is due to be revised for integration with the adopted Core Strategy.

3.17 Kinver Village is defined as a main service village and the following are the specific Key Design Principles relevant to landscape and visual implications for any new development within the settlement;

 Materials

 Enhancement of [Village] Entrances

 Density of Development

J:\7600\7686\LANDS\LVIA\7686 LVA Report.docx 8 White Hill, Kinver - Landscape & Visual Appraisal fpcr

 Retention of Views of the Parish Church

 Enhancement of The Green Space Character

3.18 Of particular significance to the site is the key design principle of;

 Roof scape: materials and details.

3.19 It states that; ‘Its valley bottom setting, below Kinver Edge, gives an unusual focus on roofscapes, consequently requiring careful attention in building design. Particular attention should therefore be given to the coherence of the village roofscape,’

3.20 The section on Village Entrances mentions the junction of Compton Road and Meddins Lane as being of particular importance. Views of the site from here are well contained by intervening structural vegetation.

Policy Summary

3.21 The Proposed Policies Map relating to the emerging Site Allocations Publication Plan strategically allocates White Hill for residential development as SAD2 274 and shows the site within the Development Boundary. Beyond this plot and directly south lies a further allocation of land SAD3 274 designated as Safeguarded Land, this however not shown within the Development Boundary. Both SAD2 & SAD3 are shown as taken out of the Green Belt Designation.

J:\7600\7686\LANDS\LVIA\7686 LVA Report.docx 9 White Hill, Kinver - Landscape & Visual Appraisal fpcr

4.0 BASELINE CONDITIONS

Landscape Character

National Character

4.1 National Character Area (NCA) profiles have prepared by Natural England for the 159 NCA`s defined across England. These NCA profiles include a description of the natural and cultural features that shape the landscape, how the landscape has changed over time, the current key drivers for ongoing change, and a broad analysis of each area’s characteristics. Figure 2 illustrates the NCA`s and other defined character areas within the context of the site.

4.2 At this very broad landscape scale, the site, lies within Natural England's National Character Area (NCA) 66 ‘Mid Severn Sandstone Plateau’. This NCA stretches from Telford in the north to Stourport on Severn in the south and therefore covers a very extensive landscape tract. Under Key Characteristics the NCA description includes the following references which are broadly relevant to the site;

 ‘Extensive sandstone plateau in the core and east of the NCA underpins an undulating landscape with tree-lined ridges; this contrasts with the irregular topography and steep, wooded gorges of the Severn Valley in the west.

 Permian and Triassic sandstones erode to free-draining, slightly acid mineral soils which historically supported extensive heathland and grassland. In contrast, marls and sandstones associated with Coal Measures erode to clayey (argillic) brown earth soils.

 The plateau is drained by the rivers Worfe and Stour and fast-flowing streams in small wooded, steep-sided streamside dells, locally known as dingles.

 The main river is the fast-flowing Severn, flowing north to south in the west of the NCA, often through steep, wooded gorges, the largest being the Ironbridge Gorge.

 Interlocking blocks of mixed woodland and old orchards provide a well-wooded landscape and conifer plantations combine with parklands to give an estate character.

 Large, open arable fields with a weak hedgerow pattern on the plateau contrast with mixed arable and pasture land with smaller, irregular shaped fields bounded by hedgerows with hedgerow oaks in the west.

 Traditional buildings constructed of brick vary in colour. The local Kidderminster and Bromsgrove Sandstone features extensively. Its characteristic red colouration provides local distinctiveness to many towns and villages and estate boundary walls.

 The Stour and Severn valleys contain frequent villages and there are a number of attractive historic towns, for example Bridgnorth and Bewdley with cores of Georgian and earlier buildings; there are fine individual examples of timber-framed buildings in Kinver, Bewdley and Bridgnorth.

 Important manmade features include the Roman road Watling Street, the Staffordshire and Worcestershire Canal, the M54 and the railway line that links the urban areas of Birmingham and the Black Country in the east with Shrewsbury in the neighbouring NCA in the west.’

J:\7600\7686\LANDS\LVIA\7686 LVA Report.docx 10 White Hill, Kinver - Landscape & Visual Appraisal fpcr

4.1 The NCA description also states;

‘…To the east, the land rises out of the Stour Valley and the sandstone ridge at Kinver Edge provides views across the Cannock Chase and Cank Wood and Arden NCAs.’

4.2 The following Statement of Opportunity is relevant to the site;

‘SEO 1: Protect, expand and appropriately manage the characteristic habitats of the NCA, specifically lowland heathland, acid grasslands and woodland including orchards and hedgerows, thus reinforcing the sense of history and reducing habitat fragmentation for the benefits that this will bring to resource protection, biodiversity, climate regulation and the recreational and experiential qualities of the NCA.’

Regional Landscape Character Assessment – Planning for Landscape Change: Supplementary Planning Guidance 2001 Staffordshire County Council

4.3 The Planning for Landscape Change SPG was undertaken at Regional Level for the Staffordshire and Stoke on Trent Structure Plan 1996-2011. It subdivides the landscape into Landscape Character Types and the site lies within the ‘Sandstone Estatelands’ LCT, specifically with a landscape character sub-category of ‘Estatelands’.

4.4 The following are extracts of this landscape character sub-type;

‘This is a varied agricultural landscape of intensive arable production but with pockets of less intensive pastoral farming. The rolling landform gives way to flatter land along the river valleys, but there are dominant ridge features with scarp slopes. Prominent large-scale hill and ridge top woodlands visually dominate the area, whilst on the mid-slopes, woodlands are sparser and of medium scale. Many of the woodlands have a heathy character to them.

This is a landscape that appears far more wooded than it actually is, with prominent positioning of woodlands and the coalescence of mature hedgerow oaks in places. The slopes in turn give way to well-treed valleys where lines of poplars can occasionally be found. Increased numbers of mature hedgerow oaks locally provide filtered views of three to four fields distance.

The unifying feature of this varied landscape is the dominance of landform over a weak medium scale regular and irregular field pattern, although that pattern is very visible because of its position on the slopes.

This is an area that is influenced by a number of halls, with attendant parkland and associated estatelands. Farms are large, with extensive modern buildings and there are characteristic home farms and estate cottages. Villages are expanding with the increase in commuter dwellings and small lanes show the obvious signs of becoming well used rat-runs.

Where farmland abuts the conurbation the landscape reflects this influence, hedgerow deterioration being more evident and horsey culture becoming frequent.’

4.5 The SPG provides specific guidance on tree and woodland planting for this sub-category LCT;

‘The existing ridge planting should be extended down the slopes, reflecting their heathy character. Woodlands should be of large scale to fit into the land-cover pattern, but predominantly shaped to landform and increasing in scale up the slopes. Field corner planting is not appropriate. On the lower ground large scale broadleaved or mixed woodlands, shaped to field pattern or localised landform, would fit into the existing character of the landscape. Overall a large amount of additional woodland would be appropriate, provided long belts alongside roads are avoided, views through

J:\7600\7686\LANDS\LVIA\7686 LVA Report.docx 11 White Hill, Kinver - Landscape & Visual Appraisal fpcr

the landscape are retained and care is taken not to enclose areas completely with additional woodland.’

4.1 The SPG proposes a landscape policy objective as ‘Maintenance’ for this LCT and the site does not occupy any zones classified as ‘Areas of highest landscape sensitivity’ or ‘Landscape at risk of rapid loss of character or quality’.

4.2 The Planning for Landscape Change character assessment can be considered as broadly appropriate to the characteristics of the site and its immediate context.

District Landscape Sensitivity Study – South Staffordshire Landscape Sensitivity Study Update 2017 by South Staffordshire Council

4.3 The South Staffordshire Landscape Sensitivity Study has been undertaken at a District level to inform the Sites Allocation Document January 2017, which forms part of the Local Plan. The study sub-divides the landscape into land parcels with potential for residential development. The site has been assessed as land parcel ‘Kinver KV11’, which describes Kinver as follows;

‘The village is located along the valley of the River Stour, below the heath and wooded sandstone escarpment of Kinver Edge which dominate and overlooks the settlement. The village’s landscape setting is enclosed by the woodland and river valley with the Staffordshire and Worcestershire Canal roughly following the course of the river….A ribbon development extends from the main body of the settlement to the west along White Hill.

The core of the village is focussed on High Street… Later residential development has grown out to create a series of lower density suburban areas. There remains a strong historic character from the many timber framed buildings in High Street and the rock houses on Kinver Edge.

The village can be seen as sitting within a ‘bowl’ and has a well treed character in views form higher land. From the settlement views are dominated by the wooded escarpment and St. Peter’s Church that rises above the village. There are also very significant areas of mainly coniferous woodland to the north and north-west.’

4.4 The Land Cover Parcel Kinver KV11 is described thus;

‘The LCP comprises a number of regular shaped fields subdivided by hedgerows containing prominent hedgerow trees. The land is gently undulating with an overall fall from west to east towards the settlement edge. The eastern edge of the LCP is provided by the rear gardens of residential dwellings in Windsor Crescent with the northern boundary being White Hill. A significant area of woodland known as Redcliff Covert is located immediately beyond the southern LCP boundary and wraps around to the west. The remainder of the western boundary is formed by the end of a ribbon development along White Hill. The Staffordshire Way crosses east-west the southernmost field. A small complex of pre-20th century buildings is located in the north eastern corner of the LCP.’

4.5 Key characteristics are stated as;

Smooth rolling landform

Intensive arable farmland with a remnant field pattern of large, open, regular fields

Broadleaved and mixed woodlands with silver birch

Well treed stream valleys

J:\7600\7686\LANDS\LVIA\7686 LVA Report.docx 12 White Hill, Kinver - Landscape & Visual Appraisal fpcr

Plantations and game coverts

Parkland

Straight roads

Heathy remnants and roadside bracken

Red brick farmsteads and estate cottages

4.6 Landscape sensitivity to housing development is stated as: Medium

4.7 It goes on to justify this evaluation;

‘The LCP is subject to significant urban influences and is completely contained by built form on the northern and eastern boundaries with further built form along part of the western boundary. The LCP has visual appeal and there are views to the south to a wooded backdrop. The hedgerow between the two fields in the northern part of the LCP is a significant feature as are its hedgerow trees.’

4.8 It makes the following comments on any proposed residential development;

‘Any development would need to be located in the western part of the site to protect skyline and to follow the topography of the LCP. The PRoW (Staffordshire Way) would need sufficient stand-off from development and could form the basis for on-site open space provision. This would also create a buffer area between any development and Redcliff Covert.’

4.9 Since Kinver is an historic settlement, it is considered pertinent to reference the published Historical Environment Character Assessment South Staffordshire 2011, by South Staffordshire Council.

4.10 The site is shown within KVHECZ5, with land associated with Potter’s Cross Farm shown as 18/19th Century Planned Enclosure, with Redcliff Covert to the south and west of the site identified as woodland plantations.

4.11 It states ’An Act of Parliament to enclose the former common land to the west of Kinver was passed in 1774, which resulted in a planned enclosure pattern comprising straight field boundaries and straightened or re-aligned road.’

Landscape Designations

4.12 The site does not lie within any national or local designation. The following designations are however within the site’s immediate context;

4.13 Enville Hall RGP is located approximately 1km to the north west of the site. The English Heritage records the designation as grade II listed and states;

‘A landscape park of c 1750 designed with the assistance of William Shenstone and remains of extensive gardens of mid C19, associated with a country house.’

4.14 Kinver Camp Scheduled Ancient Monument is located 430m south of the site along the plateau of Kinver Edge. The EH records the monument as the buried remains and earthworks of an Iron Age univallate hill fort.

4.15 Kinver Edge National Trust Estate is located 250m south of the site. The estate incorporates Holly Austin Rock Houses, Nanny’s Rock and a network of walking trails range across the slopes and

J:\7600\7686\LANDS\LVIA\7686 LVA Report.docx 13 White Hill, Kinver - Landscape & Visual Appraisal fpcr

plateau of the wooded ridgeline. A Toposcope facility is sited at the summit to interpret the panoramic 360 degree views.

4.16 Kinver Conservation Area is located approximately 750m to the south east of the site, and is concentrated predominantly around the medieval core of the settlement’s High Street and also extends up along the high ground taking into account the Parish Church and Kinver’s historical landscape of early field patterns to the south eastern settlement edge. There is no inter-visibility between the site and the CA due to built form and structural vegetation.

4.17 The Public Right of Way ‘Staffordshire Way’ traverses west-east across the southern section of the site, running parallel and within close proximity of Redcliff Covert.

Topography

4.18 The following should be read in conjunction with Figure 2.

Context – Landform

4.19 The village is located along the valley of the River Stour, below the heath and wooded sandstone escarpment of Kinver Edge, which dominates and overlooks the settlement.

4.20 The topography of the site`s context is defined by the high wooded ridgeline of Kinver Edge whose plateau ranges between 145-160m AOD. This ridgeline overlooks the site which lies within a lowland valley depression and characterised by localised rolling and undulating landform before the land rises to higher ground to the north and north west of the site in the vicinity of Enville, circa 200m AOD.

Site - Landform

4.21 The site generally comprises an east facing terrain, over the lower foot slopes of the rising Kinver Edge ridgeline. The higher ground in the west of the site broadly falls towards the eastern perimeter of the site, but with localised bluffs and hollows forming a pronounced character for the site.

4.22 A distinctive feature of the site is the centrally located bluff which straddles both the northern and southern fields, along which runs a hedgerow structure and mature hedgerow trees.

4.23 The north western site corner is approximately 81.7m falling to 71.0m AOD in the north eastern corner, with the south western corner approximately 87m falling to 76.7m AOD in the south east.

Site and Immediate Context

4.24 An assessment of landscape character of the site and its immediate context has been carried out, providing a finer level of assessment than the published studies.

4.25 The site is located on land south of White Hill, a residential development extending westwards from the village core towards the open countryside. The character of the site is evident as a break within built form affording immediate views opening up to the south of open pastoral farmland, and defined by the distinctive backdrop of the wooded escarpment of Kinver Edge.

4.26 The vergeside along White Hill is defined by a continuous trimmed hedgerow with access to the site afforded by a farm gate adjacent the Potter’s Cross Farm Building complex to the eastern corner of the site.

J:\7600\7686\LANDS\LVIA\7686 LVA Report.docx 14 White Hill, Kinver - Landscape & Visual Appraisal fpcr

4.27 The site itself comprises three medium scale pastoral regular shaped fields enclosed by a robust structure of hedgerow, with some lost sections infilled with timber rail agricultural fencing.

4.28 Low voltage overhead transmission lines traverse the site diagonally southwest to northeast forming a low level visual intrusion but which does not interfere with the wooded ridgeline skyline.

4.29 The distinctive localised landform of bluffs and hollows described in the previous section is characteristic of the site and indeed of the surrounding landscape context, this character being clearly evident and pronounced from both White Hill and along the public footpath Staffordshire Way, which traverses the southern section of the site.

4.30 Another intrinsic feature of the site is the number of mature hedgerow trees within the field enclosures imparting a strong contribution to the site character.

4.31 The experience along Staffordshire Way is initially influenced by the urbanised quality of the adjacent housing estate of Windsor Crescent but which then opens out into open pastoral farmland defined on both sides of the footpath corridor by undulating landform and a sense of enclosure enhanced by the strong woodland edge of Redcliff Covert to the south and west.

4.32 The continuation of the residential development is evident to the north west with distinctive red brick dwellings to the high ground as White Hill passes over a pronounced undulation of the rising Kinver Edge foot slope. Additionally, a tract of land used for equine pasture lies adjacent to the north west perimeter boundary and to the rear of residential properties along White Hill. There are distant views north towards sequential wooded ridgelines north in the vicinity of Enville and beyond. There is a ‘wedge’ of mid to late 20th century residential development occupying the land immediately beyond White Hill and Enville Road.

4.33 Views from White Hill encompass the undulating farm land punctuated by mature tree canopies and framed by development. The wooded backdrop is provided by the distinctive Kinver Edge escarpment with residential dwellings seen nestled along the upper slopes of Comber.

Site Features

Landscape Value

4.34 In terms of "landscape value" it is appropriate to examine the role of the site and its immediate context in terms of the range of local factors set out in the GLVIA3 (Box 5.1, page 84), and summarised in the methodology. This considers the landscape in terms of a range of factors as set out below. As a starting point, landscape designations have been considered.

4.35 Landscape Designations: The site and adjacent land is not subject to any national, local or other landscape designations. The wider landscape context includes the National Trust Estate at Kinver Edge, Kinver Camp SAM, , Enville Registered Park and Garden and Kinver Conservation Area.

4.36 Landscape Quality (Condition): The landscape of the site encompasses pastoral farmland with a relatively intact and continuous field enclosure incorporating well maintained hedgerow and post and rail agricultural fencing. There are many mature hedgerow trees with well formed canopies. Overall the landscape can be considered to be in good condition and evidentially well stewarded.

4.37 Scenic Quality: Although the site is a settlement edge site, its intrinsic site features incorporating its distinctive localised rolling landform, mature trees and well trimmed field hedgerows presents a

J:\7600\7686\LANDS\LVIA\7686 LVA Report.docx 15 White Hill, Kinver - Landscape & Visual Appraisal fpcr

rural scene, which when combined with the wooded backdrop of Kinver Edge escarpment, portray a medium scenic quality

4.38 Rarity and Representativeness: The site and its immediate context are not rare and are typical of settlement edge in the locality.

4.39 Conservation Interest: The site’s immediate context does not contain features of particular conservation value. Kinver camp and Holly Austin Rock House are beyond the immediate site context.

4.40 Recreational Value: The Staffordshire Way public footpath traverses through the site along its southern section and therefore enables access and enjoyment by the public. Other than the footpath, the site is not used for recreational uses.

4.41 Perceptual Aspects and Associations: The site is not particularly wild or tranquil, which are the perceptual aspects identified in GLVIA. No intrinsic cultural associations relating to the site are known. It is accessible via a public footpath which connects to a wider right of way network. The site is overlooked by visitors to Kinver Edge plateau and the Holly Austin Rock House.

4.42 In conclusion and having appraised the above factors it is judged that the site and the immediate landscape is of medium landscape value.

Visual Baseline

4.43 A visual appraisal has been undertaken for the site. This has explored the nature of the existing visual amenity of the area and sought to establish the approximate visibility of the site from surrounding locations and receptors. A series of photo viewpoints have been selected which support this analysis.

4.44 Photographs have been taken to illustrate a view from a specific vantage point, or to demonstrate a representative view for those receptors that are moving through the landscape, e.g. rights of way users. The photographs may demonstrate varying degrees of visibility and include both short and long range views. The photographs were taken in January 2017 and seasonal differences have been taken into account when determining the visual effects on these receptors.

Photo Viewpoints

4.45 An assessment of the likely visual effects of the proposed development upon surrounding receptors is detailed in the subsequent section. Figure 5 details the location of the viewpoints and different receptor types, and Figure 6 illustrates the Photo Viewpoints. They are briefly described below;

Viewpoint 1, 2 and 3: Short Range Views from White Hill

4.46 Viewpoint 1 is a glimpsed immediate view of the site from White Hill verge through the opening of Potter’s Cross farm gate. The robust hedgerow is prominent in the foreground with the site’s open pastoral land beyond, with residential development evident in the background at the base of the rising wooded ridgeline of Kinver Edge. Viewpoint 2 is an open view across the site with gently rolling landform commanding the foreground and an internal field enclosure dissecting the site north-south. An abundance of mature hedgerow trees punctuate the hedgerow structure, with a low voltage overhead transmission line providing a visual intrusion within the scene. Residential housing relating to Windsor Crescent is evident in the middle distance along with a tract of land

J:\7600\7686\LANDS\LVIA\7686 LVA Report.docx 16 White Hill, Kinver - Landscape & Visual Appraisal fpcr

used as equine pasture to the higher terrain in the west. Redcliff Covert and the distinctive ridgeline of Kinver Edge frame the background scene.

4.47 Viewpoint 3 is an open view looking across from the higher terrain along White Hill looking south east towards the site and Kinver. The site’s main features comprising robust hedgerows, mature hedgerow trees and undulating landform are all evident within the fore and middle grounds. The western urban edge of Kinver is clearly apparent filtered beyond mature tree canopies. The residential dwellings of Comber can be seen integrated within the rising wooded ridgeline of Kinver which commands the skyline to the south east.

Viewpoint 4 and 5: Short Range Views from Staffordshire Way

4.48 Viewpoint 4 is an open view of the southern section of the site as viewed from the Staffordshire Way public footpath traversing westwards from the urban context of Kinver. The site’s rolling localised topography channels views along the direction of travel with views of the residential development along White Hill contained, equine pasture can be seen along the higher terrain in the west along with the woodland edge of Redcliff Covert forming the background and skyline.

4.49 Viewpoint 5 is also taken from along Staffordshire Way public footpath looking back towards Kinver. The open pastoral land of the site is evident with the mature hedgerow trees and rolling topography containing longer range views. Filtered views of residential housing associated with Windsor Crescent are afforded through mature trees in the background, with the rising escarpment lying to the south.

Viewpoint 6 and 7: Mid Range Views from Kinver Edge

4.50 Viewpoint 6 is taken from the National Trust Holly Austin Rock House looking northwards across the site. The site is partially visible in the middleground, being mostly contained by intervening vegetation of Redcliff Covert at the base of Kinver Edge. The central section of the site is visually contained both by residential builtform associated with Windsor Crescent and associated garden vegetation, as well as the site’s own mature hedgerow tree canopies. Existing residential development to the north of White Hill forms a pronounced section of urban context surrounded by a well wooded scene, with the rolling hills towards Enville forming the skyline beyond.

4.51 Viewpoint 7 is taken from the high vantage point along the plateau of Kinver Edge at approximately 150m AOD looking north. There are long ranging broad panoramic views across different regions, with the settlement of Kinver abutting the base of the escarpment in the fore to middleground. The site is clearly evident with its open pastoral land and mature hedgerow trees, surrounded by the woodland of Redcliff Covert to the south and west and existing housing relating to west Kinver to the north and east. The rolling and well wooded hills around Enville form sequential ridgelines in the mid distance with more distant hills beyond extending to the skyline.

Viewpoint 8: Long Range Views from Sheepwalks Lane

4.52 This is a long range panoramic view from the high ground along Sheepwalks Lane looking across the valley towards the settlement of Kinver and its distinctive escarpment. The view is representative from the perimeter edge of Enville Hall RGP, whose boundary is formed by the rural lane’s hedgerow. The foreground view comprises a valley depression with rolling landform punctuated by hedgerow trees and field boundaries. Kinver Edge wooded ridgeline is dominant to the middleground with longer distance views of rolling hillsides extending into the background

J:\7600\7686\LANDS\LVIA\7686 LVA Report.docx 17 White Hill, Kinver - Landscape & Visual Appraisal fpcr

culminating with the Clent Hills on the horizon. The western settlement edge of Kinver is just discernible and the village is well integrated within a seemingly well wooded context.

Summary of Visual Baseline

4.53 The baseline analysis results in a number of reasoned conclusions which are summarised below:

 The site has a well contained visual envelope due to surrounding topography, built form and structural vegetation. The wooded Kinver Edge escarpment provides a mid-range visual backdrop to the south and south west whilst longer distance views towards rolling hills are evident on the horizon towards the north beyond the settlement roofscape.

 From an elevated position along the western realms of West Hill looking back towards the settlement, there are glimpses afforded of the Parish Church lying along the ridgeline to the south east, these views being filtered through the mature trees within the site.

 Receptors in the vicinity of the site include residential properties, road users and users of the Staffordshire Way public rights of way.

 Receptors within mid-range are visitors to Kinver Edge National Trust site, specifically from those trails along the plateau which allows 360 degree panoramic views across the region and also visitors of Holly Austin Rock House.

 Long distance views are mostly contained by topography, builtform and woodland but would most likely be from the higher ground in the north west around Enville.

J:\7600\7686\LANDS\LVIA\7686 LVA Report.docx 18 White Hill, Kinver - Landscape & Visual Appraisal fpcr

5.0 LANDSCAPE PROPOSALS

Introduction

5.1 The development proposals are not yet developed, but plans 1244-12 Rev A and Rev B and 1244 – 02 show how the development could take place. The existing landscape resource and the visual receptors and amenity of the site have been considered by the planning and design process and have informed the resultant scheme. The landscape components of the scheme are an important integral part of the proposals.

Landscape Design and GI Objectives

5.2 The key landscape and GI proposals for the scheme are;

 Public Open Space (POS) along both the northern edge with White Hill, and to the southern section of the site acting as a buffer to Redcliff Covert and Kinver Edge and facilitating a green corridor for Staffordshire Way. The White Hill POS will provide a development set back to the residents along White Hill and facilitate mid-range views over towards Kinver Edge helping to retain the distinctive skyline.

 A centrally located Community Green which will provide a neighbourhood pocket park and local play amenity. It is recommended that this area of open space should be carefully considered in the detailed design stage in order to accommodate the distinctive localised topography together with the existing hedgerow structures and mature hedgerow trees.

 Mitigate for the loss of any hedgerow, particularly along the site’s northern boundary with White Hill to accommodate safe vehicular access, through new hedgerow re-alignment and amenity planting within the POS.

 The provision of POS, play and habitat related proposals.

 The retention and enhancement of the site’s many mature hedgerow trees and hedgerow structures.

 The provision of robust site boundary vegetation to provide a landscape buffer between existing neighbouring residential development.

 A comprehensive network of tree planting across the site particularly along the primary streets, public open space and individual plots.

Landscape Management

5.3 All of the landscape areas and public open space features will be managed and maintained. This would be achieved through the implementation of a comprehensive Landscape Management Plan (LMP), to ensure the successful establishment and continued thriving of the landscape proposals.

J:\7600\7686\LANDS\LVIA\7686 LVA Report.docx 19 White Hill, Kinver - Landscape & Visual Appraisal fpcr

6.0 LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL EFFECTS

6.1 The following section outlines the likely landscape and visual effects that would arise from proposed development on the site. Schedules detailing these likely landscape and visual effects for the receptors are included in Appendices B and C respectively. Please refer to these in conjunction with the following descriptions.

Landscape Effects

Construction

6.2 The location and design of temporary site compounds, lighting, signage and perimeter screen fencing, combined with effective project management would seek to ensure that potential landscape effects are mitigated and minimised during the construction phase. It is anticipated that the construction working methods would adopt best practices wherever practicable and be agreed with the Local Planning Authorities and Statutory Bodies where necessary.

6.3 During construction, there would be some short term adverse landscape effects, resulting from the construction work. None of these effects would be greater than the effects arising through the operational phase of the development as described below.

Operation (following Completion)

6.4 At a national level the site lies well within the boundaries of NCA 66 ‘Mid Severn Sandstone Plateau’. The NCA covers an extensive area of landscape and there will be localised variations in landscape sensitivity. The proposed development would not result in any discernible change to landscape character at this broad geographical scale and therefore has negligible effects on the NCA as a whole both at completion and year 10.

6.5 The site lies within the ‘Sandstone Estate Lands Regional Character Area’ (Planning for Landscape Change 2001 SPG South Staffordshire Council). Whilst the characteristics of the site itself are consistent with a number of the key characteristics of the wider character area in which it lies, it is considered that the site is closely related to the existing urban fabric of Kinver, with residential development present to the west, north and all along its eastern flank.

6.6 Development will lead to the loss of three pastoral fields and the introduction of new housing elements within an existing settlement edge context, it effectively being an infill consolidation of an existing development along White Hill.

6.7 It is proposed that the site’s intrinsic landscape features such as the site’s landform, hedgerow boundaries and mature trees, will be retained and integrated within the new development. In combination with proposed GI, including public open space and new tree planting, it is considered the development will be readily integrated within the well wooded wider landscape character.

6.8 The regional level landscape receptor will be minimally changed and the scale of effect is deemed to be negligible. Overall effects will be discernible to a localised area only lessening in time as public open space proposals mature.

6.9 At sub-regional level the site lies within Land Cover Parcel ‘Kinver KV11’ of the South Staffordshire Landscape Sensitivity Study. The Study makes a number of comments for any new development to consider, namely protection of skyline views, respecting the site’s topography and other landscape features, including accommodation of a green corridor for the Staffordshire Way public

J:\7600\7686\LANDS\LVIA\7686 LVA Report.docx 20 White Hill, Kinver - Landscape & Visual Appraisal fpcr

footpath. The proposed outline scheme attempts to sensitively address these issues, an iterative design process which will continue through to the detailed design stage.

6.10 It is the intention where appropriate to retain the site’s existing landscape fabric to help ameliorate the impact upon local landscape character.

6.11 It is recommended that the new development respects the views towards the wooded backdrop of Kinver Edge, as seen from White Hill lane, and a generous development set back from the street frontage is proposed to accommodate this. A substantial section of POS is also proposed for the southern section of the site which will respect Redcliff Covert and the Staffordshire Way public footpath corridor. It is recommended that the detailed design takes into account the distinctive internal site features such as the localised landform, hedgerows and mature hedgerow trees.

6.12 The proposed GI for the site also incorporates enhanced site boundary structural vegetation and proposed new street and plot trees, which upon maturation will provide a net benefit within the site, helping the character of the new development to be integrated within an already well wooded landscape context. Landscape effects would be moderate adverse at completion reducing to moderate/minor adverse by year 10 as public open space matures helping to assimilate new housing in to the receiving landscape.

Landscape Effects upon Designations

6.13 In regard to the Registered Park Enville Hall which is located 1km to the north west, the site is effectively on the southern settlement edge of Kinver, and consequently more readily relates to the existing urban fabric rather than a landscape which can be associated with the setting of this Park. Builtform, structural vegetation and topography provide a significant disconnect between the receptor and the site.

6.14 The National Trust managed estate of Kinver Edge incorporates the Iron Age Hillfort and Toposcope along the plateau in addition to the geomorphic and heritage earth features of Holly Austin Rock Houses and Nanny’s Rock. There are also a network of Woodland Walks and Heathland Trails across the summit and lower slopes.

6.15 Panoramic views from the summit’s Toposcope are sweeping 360 degree long distance horizon views encompassing five different counties and spanning the Black Country, The Cotswolds, The Malverns, Clee Hills and Long Mynd.

6.16 Views of Kinver settlement are very much secondary and do not contribute to the panoramic viewpoint as a visitor attraction. The urban character of this small town is clearly evident at the base of the wooded ridgeline, nestling within a well wooded landscape scene. The localised landscape character around the base of Kinver Edge is predominantly woodland and urban context, the site comprising pastoral farmland.

6.17 The development of this open farm land to residential use will be evident but will not however introduce any new or contrasting character close to Kinver Edge. The site will effectively be consolidated as settlement edge abutting the wooded footslopes of Kinver ridgeline, as is already the present situation.

J:\7600\7686\LANDS\LVIA\7686 LVA Report.docx 21 White Hill, Kinver - Landscape & Visual Appraisal fpcr

Visual Effects

Visual Envelope

6.18 The site has a visual envelope which is restricted to the mid-range from most aspects due to a combination of surrounding topography, built form and structural vegetation. The wooded Kinver Edge escarpment provides a mid-range visual backdrop to the south and south west of the site.

Construction

6.19 During construction, there would be some short term adverse visual effects, resulting from the construction work, and views to partially completed works and associated activity, particularly from the public footpath that passes along the site’s southern section, Staffordshire Way, and for residents along White Hill and Windsor Crescent.

6.20 The retention of vegetation around the site boundary will help to mitigate visual effects of activity at lower levels. Where this is not possible, for example along White Hill where a section of hedgerow is proposed to be removed to allow access, then mitigation measures could include the careful location and design of hoarding, temporary site compounds, lighting, signage and perimeter screen fencing, combined with effective project management. It is anticipated that the construction working methods would adopt best practices wherever practicable and be agreed with the Local Planning Authorities and Statutory Bodies where necessary.

6.21 Short term construction effects will be greatest for receptors in the immediate vicinity of the site and from the high vantage point of Kinver Edge escarpment. None of these effects would be greater than the effects arising through the operational phase of the development as described below.

Operation (following Completion)

6.22 The following provides a summary of the visual effects assessment included at Appendix C.

6.23 The effects on visual amenity vary depending on distance from the development, the existing views and the degree of screening provided by topography, vegetation and existing builtform.

6.24 The distance between receptors and the site is important, as visual effects reduce with distance. Within this appraisal receptors located within a short distance of the site are defined as being located within 250m, while medium distance constitutes between 250m and 1km, and anything beyond that is termed as long distance.

Residential Properties and Settlement (Ref A in Figure 5)

6.25 The nature of the views was determined from publicly accessible locations and so the nature of views for specific properties cannot be described.

6.26 Viewpoints 1 & 3 have been considered as broadly representative of the views from residential dwellings located along White Hill (approximately 15 dwellings).

6.27 Permanent views afforded from dwellings along the opposite side of the street will be primarily from those rooms occupied during the daylight hours, which in most cases will be from ground floor rooms.

J:\7600\7686\LANDS\LVIA\7686 LVA Report.docx 22 White Hill, Kinver - Landscape & Visual Appraisal fpcr

6.28 Views from these receptors will be partial, being ameliorated by intervening front garden vegetation and then mostly truncated by the dense hedgerow structure forming the site’s northern perimeter.

6.29 First floor bedroom windows are likely to have more open views of the development but these rooms are generally occupied less during the waking hours and therefore have reduced significance.

6.30 In addition to this partial screening described above, the development set back forms an approximate 50m buffer from the existing dwellings along White Hill (northern carriageway). It is likely that only the upper elevations and roof lines of new dwellings will be discernible beyond the hedgerow from these receptors, apart from at the site access. Both existing and proposed trees within the POS will filter and soften views of the development roofline, with visual amelioration increasing in the longer term.

6.31 It is likely that views of the backdrop of Kinver Edge will still be visible above the new development roofscape.

6.32 Residential dwellings from Windsor Crescent (approximately 22 dwellings) will have views overlooking the new built development within the two northernmost fields, whilst 10 dwellings will overlook the undeveloped zone of Public Open Space to the southern section of the site.

6.33 For ground floor receptors, adjacent to the northern plots, views will be truncated by rear garden boundaries and filtered by garden vegetation and trees.

6.34 Only views of upper elevations and roof lines of semi-detached dwellings will be afforded, with gaps between houses allowing a depth of vision further into the site, where the retained mature tree canopies in combination with proposed street and plot trees will serve to soften the new built form.

6.35 The development proposals show a landscape buffer between the residential boundaries and the development which in time will further assist in mitigating the visual effects of the new development.

Public Rights of Way Staffordshire Way (Ref B in Figure 5)

6.36 The views along the Staffordshire Way whilst traversing though the southern section of the site are predominantly short range views within the site with views out of the site predominantly curtailed by the well wooded base of Kinver Edge and the localised landform of the site’s topography (Viewpoint 4).

6.37 Filtered views of the existing settlement edge of west Kinver associated with Windsor Crescent are afforded though garden and field boundary vegetation (Viewpoint 5).

6.38 Generally, Redcliff Covert woodland edge, mature hedgerow trees and prominent localised topography channel views along the direction of travel.

6.39 The route of the Staffordshire Way public footpath will be retained, traversing the southern section of the site allocated as Public Open Space. The immediate visual experience along this footpath will remain open and relatively unaltered, with housing beyond, which is the current experience.

Users of White Hill rural lane (Ref C in Figure 5)

6.40 There are short distance views of the site from the verge of White Hill with longer views to the wooded Kinver Edge ridgeline.

J:\7600\7686\LANDS\LVIA\7686 LVA Report.docx 23 White Hill, Kinver - Landscape & Visual Appraisal fpcr

6.41 The proposed layout provides a development set back of approximately 30m from the White Hill street frontage, allowing a buffer zone comprising public open space.

6.42 Views afforded to vehicular users will be predominantly truncated by the continuous hedgerow boundary, with filtered and glimpsed views of new development afforded during the winter months only (Viewpoint 2) and through the site access (Viewpoint 1).

6.43 Views afforded by pedestrian users looking across the trimmed hedgerow will be of a series of semi-detached residential dwellings and woodland beyond. Existing mature and proposed trees within the intervening POS will filter and soften these views to glimpsed and partial, this ameliorating effect increasing in the long term. It is likely that the wooded backdrop of Kinver Edge will be glimpsed through the gaps between dwellings and above the dwellings.

Visitors to National Trust Holly Austin Rock Houses (Ref D in Figure 5)

6.44 The foreground is dominated by Redcliff Covert along the footslopes of Kinver Edge. From this high vantage point, the northern section of the site is partially visible with intervening vegetation and builtform associated with Windsor Crescent containing further views of the site.

6.45 The site’s mature trees also filter views in the dormant season, and will provide further containment during summer months. White Hill residential development and the western settlement edge of Kinver is visible with the rolling landform of The Million woodland block and Enville Common providing the background scene with distant hills on the horizon.

6.46 The development will only be partially visible with filtered views predominantly of the roofscape of the northern most new dwellings, and Public Open Space visible beyond acting as development setback along White Hill. The settlement edge of Kinver will be seen to extend slightly, but in a location where the existing settlement edge is already closer to the viewpoint.

Visitors to National Trust Kinver Edge Viewpoint (Ref E in Figure 5)

6.47 From the high ground of the escarpment plateau there are sweeping panoramic long distance views across the surrounding regional landscape through west-north-east.

6.48 The settlement of Kinver dominates the fore to middleground extending up to wooded base of Kinver Edge. The well wooded ridgelines of Enville RGP lie to the north of Kinver with the distant rolling landscape of north Staffordshire extending into the horizon.

6.49 The site is visible from this vantage point except for the section of land south of the public footpath, which is proposed as Public Open Space.

6.50 Whilst the development would be visible, it would not introduce new elements or bring development closer to the edge.

Users of Sheepwalks Lane (Ref F in Figure 5)

6.51 There are long range panoramic views theoretically possible from high ground to the north west of the site.

6.52 Within Viewpoint 8 the foreground view comprises a valley depression with rolling landform punctuated by hedgerow trees and field boundaries. Kinver Edge wooded ridgeline is dominant to the middle ground with longer distance views of rolling hillsides extending into the background culminating with the Clent Hills on the horizon. Views of the western settlement edge of Kinver are

J:\7600\7686\LANDS\LVIA\7686 LVA Report.docx 24 White Hill, Kinver - Landscape & Visual Appraisal fpcr

well contained by woodland blocks. The settlement edge of White Hill is just discernible on the footslopes of Kinver Edge,’ sandwiched’ between a coniferous plantation and the broadleaf woodland Redcliff Covert. Long distance views of the site are contained by intervening topography, structural vegetation and built form.

Night – time Visual Effects

6.53 The proposed site is located in an area with existing built development including lighting on three sides. It is not expected that any night time impacts would exceed those experienced with day time effects.

J:\7600\7686\LANDS\LVIA\7686 LVA Report.docx 25 White Hill, Kinver - Landscape & Visual Appraisal fpcr

7.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

7.1 The site is located on land south of White Hill, and comprises three pastoral fields with existing development to the north, east and west. The site itself comprises three medium scale pastoral regular shaped fields intersected by a robust structure of hedgerow, with some lost sections infilled with timber rail agricultural fencing.

7.2 The site has a distinctive localised landform which is characteristic of the surrounding landscape context, this character being clearly evident and pronounced from both White Hill and along the public footpath Staffordshire Way. Another intrinsic feature of the site are the number of mature hedgerow trees prevailing along the field enclosures imparting a strong contribution to the site character.

7.3 Three indicative layouts have been prepared, one for 30 dwellings (Sketch Appraisal 1244-12 Rev B), one for 57 dwellings (Sketch Appraisal 1244-12 Rev A) and a larger scheme of approximately 100 dwellings on 1244 - 02 with accompanying green infrastructure of public open spaces and structural planting.

Landscape Effects

7.4 During construction there would be some short term adverse landscape effects, resulting from the construction work. None of these effects would be greater than the effects arising through the operational phase of the development.

7.5 The site has been assessed as having a landscape sensitivity of medium.

7.6 At a national scale, landscape effects during the operational phases of development will be no greater than negligible at completion and year 10.

7.7 At a regional scale the significance of effect is considered to be minor adverse falling to negligible in year 10.

7.8 At a local district level, landscape effects will be moderate adverse upon completion reducing to minor adverse in year 10.

7.9 The development would lead to the loss of pastoral farmland to residential use resulting in a medium/high degree of change for the site and its immediate context overall. However, housing is already an evident characteristic of the site’s immediate context and as such effects are deemed to be moderate adverse at completion. Effects would lessen by year 10 to moderate/minor adverse as structural planting within public open space matures to further integrate the new housing in to the landscape.

Visual Effects

7.10 The site has a visual envelope which is restricted to the mid-range from most aspects due to a combination of surrounding topography, builtform and structural vegetation. The wooded Kinver Edge escarpment provides a distinctive visual backdrop to the south and south west of the site.

7.11 During construction, there would be some short term adverse visual effects, resulting from the construction work, and views to partially completed works and associated activity, particularly from the public footpath that passes along the site’s southern section and for residents off White Hill and Windsor Crescent.

J:\7600\7686\LANDS\LVIA\7686 LVA Report.docx 26 White Hill, Kinver - Landscape & Visual Appraisal fpcr

7.12 The site is well contained by a combination of surrounding topography, builtform and structural vegetative structures, such that the site’s intervisibility is restricted to the short and mid-range receptors.

7.13 Visual effects for residential receptors are limited to localised dwellings adjoining the site boundary such as those on Windsor Crescent and along White Hill. The significance of effect is considered to be moderate adverse falling to moderate/minor adverse in year 10, with both retained and proposed green infrastructure helping the development to integrate well within its surroundings.

7.14 Transient users of White Hill rural lane will have glimpsed and partial views producing moderate adverse significance of effect reducing to minor adverse in year 10.

7.15 Visual effects from public rights of way are restricted to a short stretch of Staffordshire Way which traverses across the southern section of the site. The significance of effect is considered to be moderate adverse falling to minor adverse in year 10.

7.16 Visual effects from the high ground of the National Trust receptor Kinver Edge are considered to be moderate/minor adverse falling to minor/negligible adverse in year 10.

7.17 Theoretical long distance views from the higher ground to the northwest in and around Enville have been tested during a site visit, however the site was found to be extremely well contained.

Comparison of Landscape and Visual Effects of Development Options

7.18 In terms of landscape effects, it is considered that the 30 dwelling option would introduce development to the existing gap on White Hill, retaining a green frontage to the road. There would be development in depth, not just alongside the road. The 57 house option would extend further back into the site, taking more land out of agricultural use, but overall there would be little different landscape or visual effects. The third option with approximately 100 dwellings, would result in a greater proportion of the site being developed, up to the footpath. The northern side of the footpath towards Kinver Edge towards Kinver Edge would remain open. From the higher ground of Kinver Edge, all three development options will be perceived as a minor change within the landscape, with houses infilling a small parcel of land, already surrounded by existing houses. Overall whilst there would be an incremental increase in landscape effects resulting from each of the options with an increased residential area, this would not be enough to result in any change to the overall level of landscape or visual effects assessed.

Conclusion

7.19 The development proposals demonstrate a considered and sensitive approach towards the local landscape character and will seek to retain the site’s existing landscape features where feasible within the detail design process. The development will have limited effect on the wider landscape character. In visual terms, notable effects would be limited to receptors that border the site. Views from the higher ground of Kinver Edge, would change little in overall composition, and with no detriment to the wider panoramic views.

7.20 It is considered that the application site and receiving environment have the capacity to accommodate the proposals. The proposals will not result in significant harm to the landscape character or visual environment. It is considered that the proposed development can be successfully integrated in this location.

J:\7600\7686\LANDS\LVIA\7686 LVA Report.docx 27 This drawing is the property of FPCR Environment and Design Ltd and is issued on the condition it is not reproduced, retained or disclosed to any unauthorised person, either wholly or in part without written consent of FPCR Environment and Design Ltd.

Ordnance Survey material - Crown Copyright. All rights reserved. Licence Number: 100019980 (Centremapslive.com)

Site Boundary

client Trebor Development

project White Hill, Kinver

drawing title fpcr SITE LOCATION PLAN

scale drawn issue date N 1:12,500 A3 RGL/IDR 13 February 2017 500m 1000m drawing / figure number rev Figure 1 - FPCR Environment and Design Ltd, Lockington Hall, Lockington, Derby, DE74 2RH t: 01509 672772 f: 01509 674565 e: [email protected] w: www.fpcr.co.uk masterplanning environmental assessment landscape design urban design ecology architecture arboriculture

7686- Fig 1 Site Location.indd This drawing is the property of FPCR Environment and Design Ltd and is issued on the condition it is not reproduced, retained or disclosed to any unauthorised person, either wholly or in part without written consent of FPCR Environment and Design Ltd.

Ordnance Survey material - Crown Copyright. All rights reserved. Licence Number: 100019980 (Centremapslive.com)

Site Boundary

Staffordshire County Boundary

Planning for Landscape Change SPG : Staffordshire and Stoke on Trent Structure Plan 1996-2011

Sandstone Estateland

Ancient Redlands Estateland

Urban

Landscape Sensitivity Plan 2017 update : South Staffordshire Council

Kinver KV11: Medium Landscape Sensitivity

All of area shown lies within National Character Area 66: Mid Severn Sandstone Plateau

client Trebor Development

project White Hill, Kinver

drawing title fpcr LANDSCAPE CHARACTER

scale drawn issue date N 1:20,000 A3 RGL/IDR 14 February 2017 500m 1000m drawing / figure number rev Figure 2 - FPCR Environment and Design Ltd, Lockington Hall, Lockington, Derby, DE74 2RH t: 01509 672772 f: 01509 674565 e: [email protected] w: www.fpcr.co.uk masterplanning environmental assessment landscape design urban design ecology architecture arboriculture

J:\7600\7686\LANDS\LVIA\7686- Fig 2 Landscape Character.indd This drawing is the property of FPCR Environment and Design Ltd and is issued on the condition it is not reproduced, retained or disclosed to any unauthorised person, either wholly or in part without written consent of FPCR Environment and Design Ltd.

Ordnance Survey material - Crown Copyright. All rights reserved. Licence Number: 100019980 (Centremapslive.com)

Site Boundary

200m - 210m AOD

190m - 200m AOD

180 m - 190m AOD

170m - 180m AOD

160m - 170m AOD

150m - 160m AOD

140m - 150m AOD

130m - 140m AOD

120m - 130m AOD

110m - 120m AOD

100m - 110m AOD

90m - 100m AOD

80m - 90m AOD

70m - 80m AOD

60m - 70m AOD

50m - 60m AOD

40m - 50m AOD

client Trebor Development

project White Hill, Kinver

drawing title fpcr TOPOGRAPHY PLAN

scale drawn issue date N 1:12,500 @ A3 RGL/IDR 14 February 2017 500m 1000m drawing / figure number rev Figure 3 - FPCR Environment and Design Ltd, Lockington Hall, Lockington, Derby, DE74 2RH t: 01509 672772 f: 01509 674565 e: [email protected] w: www.fpcr.co.uk masterplanning environmental assessment landscape design urban design ecology architecture arboriculture

J:\7600\7686\LANDS\LVIA\7686- Fig 3 Topography.indd This drawing is the property of FPCR Environment and Design Ltd and is issued on the condition it is not reproduced, retained or disclosed to any unauthorised person, either wholly or in part without written consent of FPCR Environment and Design Ltd.

Ordnance Survey material - Crown Copyright. All rights reserved. Licence Number: 100019980 (Centremapslive.com)

Site Boundary

client Trebor Development

project White Hill, Kinver

drawing title fpcr AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH

scale drawn issue date N NTS @ A3 RGL/IDR 13 February 2017 500m 1000m drawing / figure number rev Figure 4 - FPCR Environment and Design Ltd, Lockington Hall, Lockington, Derby, DE74 2RH t: 01509 672772 f: 01509 674565 e: [email protected] w: www.fpcr.co.uk masterplanning environmental assessment landscape design urban design ecology architecture arboriculture

J:\7600\7686\LANDS\LVIA\7686- Fig 4 Aerial photograph.indd This drawing is the property of FPCR Environment and Design Ltd and is issued on the condition it is not reproduced, retained or disclosed to any unauthorised person, either wholly or in part without written consent of FPCR Environment and Design Ltd.

Ordnance Survey material - Crown Copyright. All rights reserved. Licence Number: 100019980 (Centremapslive.com)

Site Boundary

1 Viewpoint Location F 8

A Receptor (denoted with LVIA Reference)

A C 3 1 2

5 B A 4

6 D

7 E

client Trebor Development

project White Hill, Kinver

drawing title fpcr VISUAL APPRAISAL

scale drawn issue date N 1:12,500 @ A3 RGL/IDR 20 February 2017 500m 1000m drawing / figure number rev Figure 5 - FPCR Environment and Design Ltd, Lockington Hall, Lockington, Derby, DE74 2RH t: 01509 672772 f: 01509 674565 e: [email protected] w: www.fpcr.co.uk masterplanning environmental assessment landscape design urban design ecology architecture arboriculture

J:\7600\7686\LANDS\LVIA\7686- Fig 5 Visual Appraisal.indd This drawing is the property of FPCR Environment and Design Ltd and is issued on the condition it is not reproduced, retained or disclosed to any unauthorised Kinver Edge The Site person, either wholly or in part without written consent of FPCR Environment and Design Ltd.

Agricultural building Residential dwellings Residential dwellings White Hill associated with associated with associated with White Hill Potter’s Cross Farm Windsor Crescent

PHOTO VIEWPOINT 1: View from White Hill looking north west

Kinver Edge Residential dwellings The Site Low voltage overhead Redcliff Covert Mature trees punctuate Equine pasture adjacent to associated with lines traversing site hedgerow field boundaries site along western perimeter Windsor Crescent

Gently rolling localised topography within site

PHOTO VIEWPOINT 2: View into the site from Potter’s Cross Farm gate client Trebor Developments LLP

project White Hill, Kinver

drawing title fpcr PHOTO VIEWPOINTS 1 & 2

scale drawn issue date NTS @ A3 IDR 10 February 2017 drawing / figure number rev Figure 6 - FPCR Environment and Design Ltd, Lockington Hall, Lockington, Derby, DE74 2RH t: 01509 672772 f: 01509 674565 e: [email protected] w: www.fpcr.co.uk masterplanning environmental assessment landscape design urban design ecology architecture arboriculture

J:\7600\7686\LANDS\LVIA\7686- Fig 6 Photo Viewpoints.indd This drawing is the property of FPCR Environment and Design Ltd and is issued on the condition it is not reproduced, retained or disclosed to any unauthorised person, either wholly or in part without written consent of FPCR Environment and Design Ltd.

Residential dwellings Character of site defined by Windsor Crescent The Site Holly Austin Rock Kinver Edge Redcliff Covert associated with mature trees, hedgerows & Jenks Avenue rolling landform

Comber

White Hill

PHOTO VIEWPOINT 3: View from White Hill looking south east

Low voltage overhead Gently rolling localised Redcliff Covert Staffordshire Way public Equine pasture adjacent to The Site Mature trees punctuate lines traversing site topography within site footpath traversing site site along western perimeter hedgerow field boundaries

PHOTO VIEWPOINT 4: View from Staffordshire Way public footpath looking north west client Trebor Developments LLP

project White Hill, Kinver

drawing title fpcr PHOTO VIEWPOINTS 3 & 4

scale drawn issue date NTS @ A3 IDR 10 February 2017 drawing / figure number rev Figure 6 - FPCR Environment and Design Ltd, Lockington Hall, Lockington, Derby, DE74 2RH t: 01509 672772 f: 01509 674565 e: [email protected] w: www.fpcr.co.uk masterplanning environmental assessment landscape design urban design ecology architecture arboriculture

J:\7600\7686\LANDS\LVIA\7686- Fig 6 Photo Viewpoints.indd This drawing is the property of FPCR Environment and Design Ltd and is issued on the condition it is not reproduced, retained or disclosed to any unauthorised person, either wholly or in part without written consent of FPCR Environment and Design Ltd.

Mature trees punctuate Gently rolling localised The Site Residential dwellings Staffordshire Way public Foot slopes of Kinver Edge hedgerow field boundaries topography within site associated with footpath traversing site Windsor Crescent

PHOTO VIEWPOINT 5: View from Staffordshire Way public footpath looking south east

Redcliff Covert Residential dwellings associated with White Hill Vegetation associated western settlement edge of Kinver with Holly Austin Rock

Approximate Site Extents

PHOTO VIEWPOINT 6: View from Holly Austin Rock Cottages, Kinver Edge client Trebor Developments LLP

project White Hill, Kinver

drawing title fpcr PHOTO VIEWPOINTS 5 & 6

scale drawn issue date NTS @ A3 IDR 10 February 2017 drawing / figure number rev Figure 6 - FPCR Environment and Design Ltd, Lockington Hall, Lockington, Derby, DE74 2RH t: 01509 672772 f: 01509 674565 e: [email protected] w: www.fpcr.co.uk masterplanning environmental assessment landscape design urban design ecology architecture arboriculture

J:\7600\7686\LANDS\LVIA\7686- Fig 6 Photo Viewpoints.indd This drawing is the property of FPCR Environment and Design Ltd and is issued on the condition it is not reproduced, retained or disclosed to any unauthorised person, either wholly or in part without written consent of FPCR Environment and Design Ltd.

Foot slopes of Kinver Edge Redcliff Covert White Hill Residential dwellings associated with western settlement edge of Kinver

Approximate Site Extents

PHOTO VIEWPOINT 7: View from summit of Kinver Edge looking north

Whie Hill settlement edge Long distance views of site contained Kinver Edge by intervening vegetation & builtform

Redcliff Covert Farmland east of Rocky Wall lane

PHOTO VIEWPOINT 8: View from Sheepwalks Lane looking south east client Trebor Developments LLP

project White Hill, Kinver

drawing title fpcr PHOTO VIEWPOINTS 7 & 8

scale drawn issue date NTS @ A3 IDR 10 February 2017 drawing / figure number rev Figure 6 - FPCR Environment and Design Ltd, Lockington Hall, Lockington, Derby, DE74 2RH t: 01509 672772 f: 01509 674565 e: [email protected] w: www.fpcr.co.uk masterplanning environmental assessment landscape design urban design ecology architecture arboriculture

J:\7600\7686\LANDS\LVIA\7686- Fig 6 Photo Viewpoints.indd Appendix A Landscape and Visual Appraisal – Methodology and Assessment Criteria

Introduction

The methodology for the landscape and visual appraisal undertaken for the proposed development is detailed in the appraisal report. The following information should be read in conjunction with this methodology.

As advised in the Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (3rd Edition) (GLVIA3), the judgements made in respect of both landscape and visual effects are a combination of an assessment of the sensitivity of the receptor and the magnitude of the landscape or visual effect. The following details the definitions and criteria used in assessing sensitivity and magnitude for landscape and visual receptors.

Where it is determined that the assessment falls between or encompasses two of the defined criteria terms, then the judgement will be described as High/ Medium or Minor/ Moderate etc. This indicates that the receptor is assessed to lie between the respective definitions or to encompass aspects of both.

Landscape

Landscape Sensitivity

Landscape receptors are assessed in terms of their ‘Landscape Sensitivity’. This combines judgements on the value to be attached to the landscape and the susceptibility to change of the landscape from the type of change or development proposed. The definition and criteria adopted for these contributory factors is detailed below.

There can be complex relationships between the value attached to landscape receptors and their susceptibility to change which can be especially important when considering change within or close to designated landscapes. For example an internationally, nationally or locally valued landscape does not automatically or by definition have a high susceptibility to all types of change. The type of change or development proposed may not compromise the specific basis for the value attached to the landscape.

Landscape Value

Value can apply to a landscape area as a whole, or to the individual elements, features and aesthetic or perceptual dimensions which contribute to the character of the landscape. The following criteria have been used to categorise landscape value. Where there is no clear existing evidence on landscape value, an assessment is made based on the criteria/ factors identified below (based on the guidance in GLVIA3 Box 5.1 Page 84).

 Landscape quality (condition)

 Scenic quality

 Rarity  Representativeness

 Conservation interest

 Recreation value

 Perceptual aspects

 Associations

Landscape Definition Value

High Landscape receptors of high importance based upon factors of quality, rarity, representativeness, conservation interest, recreational value, perceptual qualities and associations. Limited potential for substitution.

Medium Landscape receptors of medium importance based upon factors of quality, rarity, representativeness, conservation interest, recreational value, perceptual qualities and associations. Capable of substitution.

Low Landscape receptors of low importance based upon factors of quality, rarity, representativeness, conservation interest, recreational value, perceptual qualities and associations. Potential for landscape improvement and creation.

Landscape Susceptibility to Change

This means the ability of the landscape receptor (overall character type/ area or individual element/ feature) to accommodate the proposed development without undue consequences for the maintenance of the baseline position and/ or the achievement of landscape planning policies and strategies. The definition and criteria for the assessment of Landscape Susceptibility to Change is as follows:

Landscape Definition Susceptibility to Change

High A highly distinctive and cohesive landscape receptor, with positive characteristics and features and no or very few detracting or intrusive elements. Landscape features intact and in very good condition and/ or rare. Limited capacity to accept the type of change/ development proposed.

Medium Distinctive and more commonplace landscape receptor, with some positive characteristics/ features and some detracting or intrusive elements. Landscape features in moderate condition. Capacity to accept well planned and designed change/ development of the type proposed.

Low Landscape receptor of mixed character with a lack of coherence and including detracting or intrusive elements. Landscape features that may be in poor or improving condition and few that could not be replaced. Greater capacity to accept the type of change/ development proposed.

Magnitude of Landscape Effects

The magnitude of landscape effects is the degree of change to the landscape receptor in terms of its size or scale of change, the geographical extent of the area influenced and its duration and reversibility. The table below sets out the categories and criteria adopted in respect of the separate considerations of Scale or Size of the Degree of Change and Reversibility. The geographical extent and duration of change are described where relevant in the appraisal.

Scale or Size of the Degree of Landscape Change

Scale or Size of the Definition Degree of Landscape Change

High Total loss of or major alteration to key characteristics / features and the introduction of new elements totally uncharacteristic to the receiving landscape. Overall landscape receptor will be fundamentally changed.

Medium Partial loss of or alteration to one or more key characteristics / features and the introduction of new elements that would be evident but not necessarily uncharacteristic to the receiving landscape. Overall landscape receptor will be obviously changed.

Low Limited loss of, or alteration to one or more key characteristics/ features and the introduction of new elements evident and/ or characteristic to the receiving landscape. Overall landscape receptor will be perceptibly changed.

Negligible Very minor alteration to one or more key characteristics/ features and the introduction of new elements characteristic to the receiving landscape. Overall landscape receptor will be minimally changed.

None No loss or alteration to the key characteristics/ features, representing ‘no change’.

Reversibility

Reversibility Definition

Irreversible The development would be permanent and the site could not be returned to its current/ former use.

Reversible The development could be deconstructed/ demolished and the site could be returned to broadly its current/ historic use (although that may be subject to qualification depending on the nature of the development).

Visual

Sensitivity of Visual Receptors

Visual sensitivity assesses each visual receptor in terms of their susceptibility to change in views and visual amenity and also the value attached to particular views. The definition and criteria adopted for these contributory factors is detailed below.

Visual Susceptibility to Change

The susceptibility of different visual receptors to changes in views and visual amenity is mainly a function of; firstly, the occupation or activity of people experiencing the view at particular locations; and secondly, the extent to which their attention or interest may therefore be focussed on the views and visual amenity they experience.

Visual Definition Susceptibility to Change

High Residents at home with primary views from ground floor/garden and upper floors. Public rights of way and footpaths where attention is focussed on the landscape and on particular views. Visitors to heritage assets or other attractions whose attention or interest is likely to be focussed on the landscape and/ or on particular views. Communities where views make an important contribution to the landscape setting enjoyed by residents. Travellers on recognised scenic routes.

Medium Residents at home with secondary views (primarily from first floor level). Public rights of way and footpaths where attention is not focussed on the landscape and/ or particular views. Travellers on road, rail or other transport with a focus on the landscape.

Low Users of outdoor recreational facilities where the view is less important to the activities (e.g. sports pitches). Travellers on road, rail or other transport where views are primarily focussed on the transport route. People at their place of work where views of the landscape are not important to the quality of the working life.

Value of Views

The value attached to a view takes account of any recognition attached to a particular view and/ or any indicators of the value attached to views, for example through guidebooks or defined viewpoints or references in literature or art.

Value of Views Definition

High A unique or identified view (eg. shown as such on Ordnance Survey map, guidebook or tourist map) or one noted in literature or art. A view where a heritage asset makes an important contribution to the view.

Medium A typical and/ or representative view from a particular receptor.

Low An undistinguished or unremarkable view from a particular receptor.

Magnitude of Visual Effects

Magnitude of Visual Effects evaluates each of the visual effects in terms of its size or scale, the geographical extent of the area influenced and its duration and reversibility. The table below sets out the categories and criteria adopted in respect of the Scale or Size (including the degree of contrast) of Visual Change. The distance and nature of the view and whether the view will be permanent or transient are also detailed in the Visual Effects Table.

Scale or Size of the Definition Degree of Visual Change

High The proposal will result in a large and immediately apparent change in the view, being a dominant and new and/ or incongruous feature in the landscape.

Medium The proposal will result in an obvious and recognisable change in the view and will be readily noticed by the viewer.

Low The proposal will constitute a minor component of the wider view or a more recognisable component that reflects those apparent in the existing view. Awareness of the proposals will not have a marked effect on the overall nature of the view.

Negligible/ None Only a very small part of the proposal will be discernible and it will have very little or no effect on the nature of the view.

Level of Effect

The final conclusions on effects, whether adverse or beneficial, are drawn from the separate judgements on the sensitivity of the receptors and the magnitude of the effects. This overall judgement involves a reasoned professional overview of the individual judgements against the criteria, to then make the overall judgement.

Whilst GLVIA3 notes at paragraph 5.56 that there are no hard and fast rules about the level of effects, the criteria adopted for this landscape and visual appraisal are defined as follows:

 Major: An effect that will fundamentally change and be in direct contrast to the existing landscape or views;

 Moderate: An effect that will markedly change the existing landscape or views but may retain or incorporate some characteristics/ features currently present;

 Minor: An effect that will entail limited or localised change to the existing landscape/ views or will entail more noticeable localised change but including both adverse and beneficial effects and is likely to retain or incorporate some characteristics/ features currently present;

 Negligible: An effect that will be discernible yet of very limited change to the existing landscape or views.

White Hills, Kinver – Landscape and Visual Appraisal: Landscape Effects Table fpcr

APPENDIX B: LANDSCAPE EFFECTS TABLE (LET)

Landscape Receptor and Judged Sensitivity of Judged Magnitude of Description/ Notes Overall Overall Overall Reference Landscape Landscape Effect Effect at Effect upon Effect at 10 Construction Completion Years post Phase Completion

Susceptibility Landscape Scale or Size of the Where Major Major Major to Change Value Degree of Change applicable, Moderate Moderate Moderate including degree of are the Minor Minor Minor contrast/integration) Effects Negligible Negligible Negligible at Stages of Project Reversible? None None None

High High High Yes Adverse Adverse Adverse Medium Medium Medium No Beneficial Beneficial Beneficial Low Low Low N/A Negligible None

National Landscape

Character

Medium Medium Negligible No Negligible Negligible Natural England, National The site lies well within the boundaries of the Natural England's National Character Area (NCA) 66 Negligible Character Area Profile ‘Mid Severn Sandstone Plateau. (NCA) 66 ‘Mid Severn The profile notes: ‘Extensive sandstone plateau in the core and east of the NCA underpins an Sandstone Plateau’ undulating landscape with tree-lined ridges; this contrasts with the irregular topography and steep,

wooded gorges of the Severn Valley in the west.’

The NCA covers an extensive area of landscape and there will be localised variations in landscape sensitivity. The proposed development would not result in any discernible change to landscape character at this broad geographical scale.

However, the proposed development represents an opportunity to contribute to Statement of Environmental Opportunity 1 by protecting, expanding and appropriately managing the characteristic habitats of the NCA, specifically lowland heathland, acid grasslands and woodland including orchards and hedgerows.

White Hills, Kinver – Landscape and Visual Appraisal: Landscape Effects Table fpcr

APPENDIX B: LANDSCAPE EFFECTS TABLE (LET)

Landscape Receptor and Judged Sensitivity of Judged Magnitude of Description/ Notes Overall Overall Overall Reference Landscape Landscape Effect Effect at Effect upon Effect at 10 Construction Completion Years post Phase Completion

Susceptibility Landscape Scale or Size of the Where Major Major Major to Change Value Degree of Change applicable, Moderate Moderate Moderate including degree of are the Minor Minor Minor contrast/integration) Effects Negligible Negligible Negligible at Stages of Project Reversible? None None None

High High High Yes Adverse Adverse Adverse Medium Medium Medium No Beneficial Beneficial Beneficial Low Low Low N/A Negligible None

Landscape Character Assessment (LCA): County/District

Medium Negligible No Minor Negligible Planning for Landscape Medium Whilst the characteristics of the site itself are consistent with a number of the key characteristics of Minor Change SPG 2001 adverse adverse adverse the wider character area in which it lies, it is considered that the site is closely related to the existing (Staffordshire County urban fabric of Kinver, with residential development present to the west, north and all along its Council) eastern flank. ‘Sandstone Estatelands Regional Character Area’ Development will lead to the loss of three pastoral fields and the introduction of new housing elements within an existing settlement edge context, it effectively being an infill consolidation of an existing development along White Hill.

It is proposed that the site’s intrinsic landscape features such as the site’s landform, hedgerow boundaries and mature trees, will be retained and integrated within the new development. In combination with proposed GI, including public open space and new tree planting, it is considered the development will be readily integrated within the well wooded wider landscape character.

The regional level landscape receptor will be minimally changed and the scale of effect is deemed to be negligible. Overall effects will be discernible to a localised area only and are therefore Minor lessening in time as public open space proposals mature with planting of local provenance as recommended in the guidance.

White Hills, Kinver – Landscape and Visual Appraisal: Landscape Effects Table fpcr

APPENDIX B: LANDSCAPE EFFECTS TABLE (LET)

Landscape Receptor and Judged Sensitivity of Judged Magnitude of Description/ Notes Overall Overall Overall Reference Landscape Landscape Effect Effect at Effect upon Effect at 10 Construction Completion Years post Phase Completion

Susceptibility Landscape Scale or Size of the Where Major Major Major to Change Value Degree of Change applicable, Moderate Moderate Moderate including degree of are the Minor Minor Minor contrast/integration) Effects Negligible Negligible Negligible at Stages of Project Reversible? None None None

High High High Yes Adverse Adverse Adverse Medium Medium Medium No Beneficial Beneficial Beneficial Low Low Low N/A Negligible None

Medium Medium / High No Moderate Minor South Staffordshire Medium The Study describes the site as ‘subject to significant urban influences and is completely contained Major/moderate adverse adverse adverse Landscape Sensitivity Study by built form on the northern and eastern boundaries with further built form along part of the western Update 2017 boundary’ and that ‘[the site] has visual appeal and there are views to the south to a wooded backdrop. The hedgerow between the two fields in the northern part of the LCP is a significant South Staffordshire Council feature as are its hedgerow trees.’ ‘Kinver KV11’ The Study comments that ‘Any development would need to be located in the western part of the site to protect skyline and to follow the topography of the LCP. The PRoW (Staffordshire Way) would need sufficient stand-off from development and could form the basis for on-site open space provision. This would also create a buffer area between any development and Redcliff Covert.’

It is the intention where appropriate to retain the site’s existing landscape fabric to help ameliorate the impact upon local landscape character.

It is recommended that the new development respects the views towards the wooded backdrop of Kinver Edge, as seen from White Hill lane, and a generous development set back from the street frontage is proposed to accommodate this. A substantial section of POS is also proposed for the southern section of the site which will respect Redcliff Covert and the Staffordshire Way public footpath corridor. It is recommended that the detailed design layouts takes into account the distinctive internal site features such as the localised landform, hedgerows and mature hedgerow trees.

The proposed GI for the site also incorporates enhanced site boundary structural vegetation and proposed new street and plot trees, which upon maturation will provide a net benefit within the site, helping the character of the new development to be integrated within an already well wooded landscape context.

Medium Negligible/None No Negligible/None Negligible / Setting of Enville Hall, RGP High The RGP Enville Hall is 1km to the north west of the site at its closet point. The site is effectively on Negligible/None None the southern settlement edge of Kinver, and consequently more readily relates to the existing urban

fabric rather than a landscape which can be associated with the setting of this RGP. Built form, structural vegetation and topography provide a significant disconnect between the receptor and the site, resulting in a negligible effect upon the setting of this heritage landscape.

White Hills, Kinver – Landscape and Visual Appraisal: Landscape Effects Table fpcr

APPENDIX B: LANDSCAPE EFFECTS TABLE (LET)

Landscape Receptor and Judged Sensitivity of Judged Magnitude of Description/ Notes Overall Overall Overall Reference Landscape Landscape Effect Effect at Effect upon Effect at 10 Construction Completion Years post Phase Completion

Susceptibility Landscape Scale or Size of the Where Major Major Major to Change Value Degree of Change applicable, Moderate Moderate Moderate including degree of are the Minor Minor Minor contrast/integration) Effects Negligible Negligible Negligible at Stages of Project Reversible? None None None

High High High Yes Adverse Adverse Adverse Medium Medium Medium No Beneficial Beneficial Beneficial Low Low Low N/A Negligible None

Medium/High Negligible No Minor Minor/ Negligible Negligible Kinver Edge National Trust High The National Trust managed estate of Kinver Edge incorporates the Iron Age Hillfort and Toposcope adverse adverse adverse Managed Estate along the plateau in addition to the geomorphic and heritage earth features of Holly Austin Rock

Houses and Nanny’s Rock. There are also a network of Woodland Walks and Heathland Trails across the summit and lower slopes.

Panoramic views from the Toposcope are sweeping 360 degree long distance horizon views encompassing five different counties and spanning the Black Country, The Cotswolds, The Malverns, Clee Hills and Long Mynd.

Views of Kinver settlement are very much secondary and do not contribute to the panoramic viewpoint as a visitor attraction. The urban character of this small town is clearly evident at the base of the wooded ridgeline, and as such contributes to the setting of Kinver Edge albeit in a subordinate manner nestling within a well wooded landscape scene. The localised landscape character around the base of Kinver Edge is predominantly woodland and urban context, the site comprising pastoral farmland.

The development of this open farm land to residential use will be evident but will not however introduce any new or contrasting character to the setting of Kinver Edge. The site will effectively be consolidated as settlement edge abutting the wooded footslopes of Kinver ridgeline, as is already the present situation.

As such the development is considered to have a minor/negligible impact upon the National Trust Kinver Edge site, it forming a small component which is not untypical for the existing context. Furthermore, the extensive panoramic views will not be affected. In the longer term the new development will become integrated within the setting of Kinver Edge.

Landscape Character: Site and Immediate Context

White Hills, Kinver – Landscape and Visual Appraisal: Landscape Effects Table fpcr

APPENDIX B: LANDSCAPE EFFECTS TABLE (LET)

Landscape Receptor and Judged Sensitivity of Judged Magnitude of Description/ Notes Overall Overall Overall Reference Landscape Landscape Effect Effect at Effect upon Effect at 10 Construction Completion Years post Phase Completion

Susceptibility Landscape Scale or Size of the Where Major Major Major to Change Value Degree of Change applicable, Moderate Moderate Moderate including degree of are the Minor Minor Minor contrast/integration) Effects Negligible Negligible Negligible at Stages of Project Reversible? None None None

High High High Yes Adverse Adverse Adverse Medium Medium Medium No Beneficial Beneficial Beneficial Low Low Low N/A Negligible None

Medium Medium Medium / High No Major/ moderate Moderate Moderate / Site and Immediate Context The development of the open pastoral farmland for residential use will clearly have an impact on the adverse adverse Minor site and the immediate context. The nature of the development proposals in particular scale and adverse density will respect the prevailing local urban character. The development proposals will provide two

undeveloped zones to soften the edge transition between the rural lane of White Hill to the north

and indeed a larger area of Public Open Space to the southern section of the site adjacent the

wooded footslopes of Kinver Edge, this undeveloped zone also respecting the public footpath corridor of Staffordshire Way.

Additionally there will be an area of POS within the site proposed as a Community Green, within this area it is recommended that the localised rolling landform of the site together with existing hedgerows and mature trees will be retained, thereby preserving the most valued characteristics of the farmland landscape character. The proposed GI for the site also incorporates enhanced site boundary structural vegetation and proposed new street and plot trees, which upon maturation will provide a net benefit within the site.

With regard to the site’s immediate context, the new development will not be introducing a new or contrasting landscape character, since existing residential already exerts an urbanising influences upon the site.

White Hill, Kinver – Landscape and Visual Appraisal: Visual Effects Table fpcr

APPENDIX C: VISUAL EFFECTS TABLE (VET)

Ref Receptor Type Judged Sensitivity Judged Magnitude of Visual Effects Description/ Notes Overall Effect Overall Overall Effect and Location of Visual Receptor at Effect upon 10 Years (including approx no. Construction Completion post of dwellings where Phase Completion applicable) Susceptibi Value Distance from Nature Is the View Size/Scale of Visual Major Major Major lity to Site Boundary of View Permanent or Effect (incl. degree Moderate Moderate Moderate Change (or Built Transient? of contrast/ Minor Minor Minor Development integration) (at Negligible Negligible Negligible where stated) Stages of Project) None None None (approx. m/km) High High Full High Adverse or Adverse or Adverse or Medium Medium Partial Medium Beneficial Beneficial Beneficial Low Low Glimpse Low None Negligible/ None

A Residential dwellings High Medium 50m from built Partial Permanent  The nature of the views was determined from publically accessible Major / Moderate along White Hill development Construction: High locations and so the nature of views for specific properties cannot be moderate adverse Moderate/ minor (approximately 15 adverse adverse Completion: described. dwellings) and  Viewpoints 1 & 3 have been considered as broadly representative of Windsor Crescent High/medium the views from residential dwellings located along White Hill. (approximately 22 Year 10: Medium  Permanent views afforded from dwellings along the opposite side of dwellings) the street will be primarily from those rooms occupied during the daylight hours, which in most cases will be from ground floor rooms.  Views from these receptors will be partial, being ameliorated by intervening front garden vegetation and then mostly truncated by the dense hedgerow structure forming the site’s northern perimeter.  In addition to this partial screening, the development set back forms an approximate 50m buffer from the existing dwellings along White Hill (northern carriageway). It is likely that only the upper elevations and roof lines of new dwellings will be discernible beyond the hedgerow from these receptors. Both existing and proposed trees within the POS will filter and soften views of the development roofline, with visual amelioration increasing in the longer term.  It is likely that views of the backdrop of Kinver Edge will still be visible above the new development roofscape.  Residential dwellings from Windsor Crescent will have views overlooking the new built development within the two northernmost fields, whilst 10 dwellings will overlook the Public Open Space to the southern section of the site.  For ground floor receptors adjacent to the northern plots, views will be truncated by rear garden boundaries and filtered by garden vegetation and trees.  Only views of upper elevations and roof lines of semi-detached dwellings will be afforded, with gaps between units allowing a depth of vision further into the site, where the retained mature tree canopies in combination with proposed street and plot trees will serve to soften the new builtform.  The development proposals show a landscape buffer between the residential boundaries and the development which in time will further assist in mitigating the visual effects of the new development.

Users of Public High Medium Internal site view Partial Transient  Experience along footpath is a medium scale field with views out of Major/ moderate Moderate Minor B Footpath Construction: the site predominantly curtailed by the well wooded base of Kinver adverse adverse adverse Staffordshire Way High/medium Edge and the localised rolling landform of the site’s topography (Viewpoint 4). Completion: Medium  Filtered views of the existing settlement edge of west Kinver Year 10: Medium/Low associated with Windsor Crescent are afforded though garden and field boundary vegetation (Viewpoint 5).  Generally mature hedgerow trees, Redcliff Covert woodland and the prominent localised landform channel views along the direction of travel.  The route of the Staffordshire Way public footpath will be retained, traversing through the southern section of the site allocated as Public Open Space. The immediate visual experience along this

1 White Hill, Kinver – Landscape and Visual Appraisal: Visual Effects Table fpcr

footpath will remain open and relatively unaltered, with housing beyond, which is the current experience.

Users of White Hill, Medium Medium 0-3m Partial / Transient Moderate Moderate Minor adverse C rural lane (pedestrian Glimpsed Construction:  Short distance views of the site from the verge of White Hill with adverse adverse & vehicular) longer views to Kinver Edge providing a well wooded backdrop. High/Medium  The proposed layout provides a development set back of (67.5-75m AOD) Completion: approximately 30m from the White Hill street frontage, allowing a buffer zone comprising public open space. High/Medium  Views afforded to vehicular users will be predominantly truncated by Year 10: Medium the continuous hedgerow boundary, with filtered and glimpsed views of new development afforded during the winter months only

(Viewpoint 2) and through the site access.  Views afforded by pedestrian users looking across the trimmed hedgerow will be of a series of semi-detached residential dwellings and woodland beyond. Existing mature and proposed trees within the intervening POS will filter and soften these views to glimpsed and partial, this ameliorating effect increasing in the long term. It is likely that the wooded backdrop of Kinver Edge will be glimpsed through the gaps between dwellings, and above the dwellings.

Visitors to National High Medium 300m Partial Permanent  The foreground is dominated by Redcliff Covert along the footslopes Moderate Moderate /minor Minor D Trust site, Holly Construction:Medium/ of Kinver Edge. From this high vantage point, the northern section of adverse adverse adverse Austin Rock Houses low the site is partially visible with intervening vegetation and builtform associated with Windsor Crescent containing further views of the Completion: site. (105m AOD) Medium/low  The site’s mature trees also filter views in the dormant season, and will provide further containment during summer months. Year 10: Low  White Hill residential development and the western settlement edge of Kinver is visible with the rolling landform of The Million woodland block and Enville Common providing the background scene with distant hills on the horizon.  The development will only be partially visible with filtered views predominantly of the roofscape of the northern most new dwellings, and Public Open Space visible beyond acting as development setback along White Hill.  The settlement edge of Kinver will be seen to extend slightly, but in a location where the existing settlement edge is already closer to the viewpoint. High High 440m Full Permanent  Extensive sweeping panoramic long distance views across Moderate Moderate/ minor Minor/ negligible Visitors to National E Construction:Medium/ surrounding landscape through west-north-east. adverse adverse adverse Trust site, Kinver  Settlement of Kinver dominates fore to middle ground extending up Edge summit Low to wooded base of Kinver Edge. (145m AOD) Completion: Low  Well wooded ridgeline of The Million and Enville Common lie to the Year 10: north of Kinver with distant rolling landscape of north Staffordshire extending into the horizon. Low/Negligible  The site is visible from this vantage point except for the section of land south of the public footpath, which is proposed as Public Open Space.  Whilst the development would be visible, it would not introduce new elements or bring development closer to the edge. Medium Medium 2.1Km None Transient  Long range panoramic view from high ground to the north west of None None None Users of rural lane F Construction: None the site. Sheepwalks Lane Completion: None  Foreground view comprises a valley depression with rolling landform (155-160m AOD) punctuated by hedgerow trees and field boundaries. Year 10: None  Kinver Edge wooded ridgeline is dominant to the middleground with longer distance views of rolling hillsides extending into the background culminating with the Clent Hills on the horizon.  Views of the western settlement edge of Kinver are well contained by woodland blocks.  The settlement edge of White Hill is just discernible on the footslopes of Kinver Edge,’ sandwiched’ between a coniferous plantation and broadleaf woodland Redcliff Covert.  Long distance views of the site are contained by intervening topography, structural vegetation and builtform.

2 Appendix D

Sketch Appraisal Plans (57 units) 1244-12 Rev A

Sketch Appraisal Plans (30 units) 1244-12 Rev B

Sketch Appraisal Masterplan (104 units) 1244-02 POTENTIAL FOOTPATH LINK SUBJECT TO DISCUSSIONS WITH NATIONAL TRUST

Line of Footpath Retained

POTENTIAL NEW CIRCULAR FOOTPATH ROUTE ON LAND OWNED BY STAYLEY DEVELOPMENTS

Rev B POTENTIAL FOOTPATH LINK SUBJECT TO DISCUSSIONS WITH NATIONAL TRUST

Line of Footpath Retained

POTENTIAL NEW CIRCULAR FOOTPATH ROUTE ON LAND OWNED BY STAYLEY DEVELOPMENTS

Rev A TREBOR DEVELOPMENTS

Innovation Centre, Longbridge Technology Park, 1 Devon Way, Birmingham, B31 2TS

t| 08455 276 981 f| 0121 222 5481 e| [email protected] w| www.trebordevelopments.co.uk

DEVELOPMENT OFF WHITE HILL, KINVER

SKETCH APPRAISAL

1:500@A0 MAY 2014

1244-02

DO NOT SCALE FROM DRAWING. MINOR INACCURACIES MAY OCCUR DUE TO PRINTING PROCESSES. ALL WRITTEN / SCALED DIMENSIONS & FLOOR AREAS ARE SUBJECT TO VERIFICATION BY CONTRACTOR(S) ON SITE.

THIS DRAWING, DESIGN & BUILDING WORKS DEPICTED ARE THE © COPYRIGHT OF KEVIN R. TWIGGER ASSOCIATES LTD & MAY NOT BE AMENDED OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. NO LIABILITY WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR AMENDMENTS OR ALTERATIONS MADE BY OTHERS.

Kevin R.Twigger & Associates Ltd

Rushall House, School Road, Brewood, Staffs, ST19 9DS t| 01902 851 641 f| 01902 851642 e| [email protected] w| www.krtassociates.co.uk 0m 10m 20m 30m 40m 50m METRES SCALE BAR - 1:500 ARCHITECTURAL CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYORS LANDSCAPE DESIGN