Australian Sharks and Rays
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
SYNOPSIS of BIOLOGICAL DATA on the SCHOOL SHARK Galeorhinus Australis (Macleay 1881)
FAO Fisheries Synopsis No. 139 FHVS139 (Distribution restricted) SAST - School shark - 1,O8(O4)O1LO S:OPSIS 0F BIOLOGICAL EATA )N THE SCHOOL SHARK Galeorhinus australis (Macleay 1881]) F 'O FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF E UNITED NATIONS FAO Fisheries Synopsis No. 139 FIR/S139 (Distributíon restricted) SAST - School shark - 1,08(04)011,04 SYNOPSIS OF BIOLOGICAL DATA ON THE SCHOOL SHARK Galeorhinus australis (Macleay 1881) Prepared by A.M. Olsen* 11 Orchard Grove Newton, S.A. 5074 Australia FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome 1984 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization oftheUnited Nationsconcerning thelegal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. M-43 ISBN 92-5-1 02085-X Allrightsreserved. No part ofthispublicationmay be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic,mechanical, photocopyingor otherwise, withouttheprior permíssion of the copyright owner. Applications for such permission, with a statement of the purpose and extent of the reproduction, should be addressed to the Director, Publications Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Via delle Terme di Caracalla, 00100 Rome, Italy. © FAO 1984 FIR/5l39 School shark PREPARATION OF THIS SYNOPSIS The authors original studies on school shark were carried out while being a Senior Research Scientist with the CSIRO, Division of Fisheries and Oceanography, Cronulla, New South Wales, and continued during his service as Director of the Department of Fisheries and Fauna Conservation, South Australia. -
Rapid Assessment of Sustainability for Ecological Risk of Shark and Other
Rapid assessment of sustainability for ecological risk of shark and other chondrichthyan bycatch species taken in the Southern and Eastern Scalefish and Shark Fishery Terence I. Walker, John D. Stevens, J. Matias Braccini, Ross K. Daley, Charlie Huveneers, Sarah B. Irvine, Justin D. Bell, Javier Tovar‐Ávila, Fabian I. Trinnie, David T. Phillips, Michelle A. Treloar, Cynthia A. Awruck, Anne S. Gason, John Salini, and William C. Hamlett Project No. 2002/033 Rapid assessment of sustainability for ecological risk of shark and other chondrichthyan bycatch species taken in the Southern and Eastern Scalefish and Shark Fishery Terence I. Walker, John D. Stevens, J. Matias Braccini, Ross K. Daley, Charlie Huveneers, Sarah B. Irvine, Justin D. Bell, Javier Tovar‐ Ávila, Fabian I. Trinnie, David T. Phillips, Michelle A. Treloar, Cynthia A. Awruck, Anne S. Gason, John Salini, and William C. Hamlett July 2008 Project Number 2002/033 Rapid assessment of sustainability for ecological risk of shark and other chondrichthyan bycatch species taken in the Southern and Eastern Scalefish and Shark Fishery FRDC Report 2002/033 Terence I. Walker, John D. Stevens, J. Matias Braccini, Ross J. Daley, Charlie Huveneers, Sarah B. Irvine, Justin D. Bell, Javier Tovar‐ Ávila, Fabian I. Trinnie, David T. Phillips, Michelle A. Treloar, Cynthia A. Awruck, Anne S. Gason, John Salini, and Hamlett, W. C. Published by Department of Primary Industries, Fisheries Research Brand, Queenscliff, Victoria, 3225. © Fisheries Research and Development Corporation, and Fisheries Victoria. 2008 This work is copyright. Except as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), no part of this publication may be reproduced by any process, electronic or otherwise, without the specific written permission of the copyright owners. -
Giveflakeabreak
WHY WE SHOULD #GiveFlakeABreak Cover Image: Shark with school of fish by Alex Kydd. 1 Written by Dr Leonardo Guida Shark scientist & shark campaign lead Australian Marine Conservation Society January 2021 This report was funded by the Shark Conservation Fund, a philanthropic collaborative pooling expertise and resources to meet the threats facing the world’s sharks and rays. The Shark Conservation Fund is a project of Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors. 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Aussie sharks and the humble piece of flake Australian waters are home to one quarter of the world’s sharks and rays. More than 320 species live in Australian waters, half of them aren’t found anywhere else in the world but in our blue backyard (1). Aussie sharks end up in our fish and chips shops as the humble serving of ‘flake’. Since around the 1920s it’s been an Australian staple of many meals at the beach or a Friday night dinner with the family. Despite its popularity, one third of Australians don’t know that ‘flake’ is actually shark meat! (2) This report surveyed 70 fish and chip shops across Australia that sell shark meat and found that less than one third (29%) of shark meat on offer was labelled as a species. The rest were labelled generically as ‘flake’ and in one case, ‘boneless baby shark’. Species labelled included, hammerhead, bronze whaler, thresher shark, and the critically endangered school shark. Why should we #GiveFlakeABreak? Endangered sharks are being sold as ‘flake’ and you could be eating/selling them without knowing. Flake should only refer to shark meat from gummy and rig sharks which aren’t endangered. -
The Ecology and Biology of Wobbegong Sharks
THE ECOLOGY AND BIOLOGY OF WOBBEGONG SHARKS (GENUS ORECTOLOBUS) IN RELATION TO THE COMMERCIAL FISHERY IN NEW SOUTH WALES, AUSTRALIA © Lindsay Marshall Orectolobus maculatus BY CHARLIE HUVENEERS B.SC. (HONS.) Thesis submitted as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate School of the Environment Macquarie University February 2007 2 Table of Contents Table of Contents.................................................................................................................3 List of Figures......................................................................................................................9 List of Tables .....................................................................................................................13 Summary............................................................................................................................17 Declaration.........................................................................................................................21 Acknowledgements............................................................................................................23 Chapter acknowledgments.................................................................................................27 Dedication..........................................................................................................................29 CHAPTER 1 : General Introduction..............................................................................31 -
2009 Shark Assessment Report for the Australian National Plan of Action for the Conservation and Management of Sharks
2009 Shark Assessment Report for the Australian National Plan of Action for the Conservation and Management of Sharks Bensley N, Woodhams J, Patterson HM, Rodgers M, McLoughlin K, Stobutzki I, and Begg GA March 2010 ISBN 978-1-921192-44-9 Bensley N, Woodhams J, Patterson HM, Rodgers M, McLoughlin K, Stobutzki I, and Begg GA 2009, Shark Assessment Report for the Australian National Plan of Action for the Conservation and Management of Sharks, final report to the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra. © Commonwealth of Australia 2010 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Commonwealth. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Commonwealth Copyright Administration, Attorney General’s Department, Robert Garran Offices, National Circuit, Barton ACT 2600 or posted at http://www.ag.gov.au/cca. The Australian Government acting through the Bureau of Rural Sciences has exercised due care and skill in the preparation and compilation of the information and data set out in this publication. Notwithstanding, the Bureau of Rural Sciences, its employees and advisers disclaim all liability, including liability for negligence, for any loss, damage, injury, expense or cost incurred by any person as a result of accessing, using or relying upon any of the information or data set out in this publication to the maximum extent permitted by law. Postal address: Bureau of Rural Sciences GPO Box 858 Canberra, ACT 2601 Ph: +61 2 6272 4282 Fax: +61 2 6272 4747 Email: [email protected] Internet: www.brs.gov.au Publication sales: 1800 020 157 Acknowledgements This research project was funded by the Natural Heritage Trust (NHT) and the Bureau of Rural Sciences (BRS). -
Shark Utilization, Marketing and Trade FAO Shark Utilization, FISHERIES TECHNICAL Marketing and Trade PAPER 389
Shark utilization, marketing and trade FAO Shark utilization, FISHERIES TECHNICAL marketing and trade PAPER 389 by Stefania Vannuccini FAO Consultant Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome, 1999 Cf"''.!!-; material The des»gnaik>ns employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of rtsauthorities. or cofKeming the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. M^7 ISBN 92-5-104361-2 All rights resen/ed. No part of this pubitcation may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. Applications for such permission, with a statement of the purpose and extent of the reproduction, should be addressed to the Director, Information Division. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Viale delle Termed! Caracalla. 00100 Rome. Italy. © FAO 19»9 Copyrighted material PREPARATION OF THE DOCUMENT The population dynamics of sharks arc not well know n, in particular their biology and stock assessment, except for certain species. In general many shark species arc particularly vulnerable to over-exploitation due to their biological characteristic of low reproductive potential and therefore limited capacity to recover from overfishing. Over the last twenty years the increase in demand for and value of fins and cartilage and the expansion of the market for shark meat have caused a consistent growth of recreational and commercial shark fisheries. -
When Predator Becomes Prey
www.ecosmagazine.com Published: 2010 When predator becomes prey Robin Taylor Shark attacks on swimmers or surfers have a tendency to make headlines. But, there has been less public interest in the insidious depletion of the world’s shark populations due to overfishing and other human activities. Robin Taylor reports. Credit: Greenpeace. Photo by Jeremy Sutton-Hibbert. Conservation groups such as the Australian Marine Conservation Society (AMCS) and its patron, well-known writer Tim Winton, are campaigning to save Australia’s sharks. Already, they have successfully lobbied to reduce shark quotas in Queensland. According to the Society, 100 million sharks are killed each year around the world, and shark numbers have declined by 90 per cent. As a top predator, sharks are known as a keystone species. They maintain the balance of prey species, which sets up a cascading effect across the entire marine food web. For this reason, reducing the numbers of sharks has significant and unpredictable impacts on marine ecosystems. Shark fins and bycatch Compared with other fish species, the flesh of sharks is considered as low value and hardly worth the cost of freezing and transportation. However, the huge consumer demand for shark fins – largely driven by Hong Kong and an increasingly affluent Chinese market – has made sharks among the most valuable animals in the sea. In Asian markets, fins are sold for up to AU$500 per kg, and fins from the large whale and basking sharks can fetch more than $10 000. In Australian waters, the brutal practice of shark finning – where fins are removed and the shark, often still alive, is thrown back into the sea – is banned. -
AC25 Doc. 17 Annex 2 Australia – P
AC25 Doc. 17 Annex 2 Australia – p. 1 Australia’s response to CITES Notification 2010/027 The Australian Government is providing the following information to the Animals Committee, in response to CITES Notification 2010/027 part (a) Sharks. Parties are invited to report on trade in specimens of these species and to provide information on the implementation of National Plans of Action for sharks or regional plans and other available relevant data and information on the species [see Resolution Conf. 12.6 (Rev. CoP15)]. Australia’s National Plan of Action for the Conservation and Management of Sharks As a member of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and in response to the FAO International Plan of Action for the Conservation and Management of Sharks, Australia developed its own National Plan of Action for the Conservation and Management of Sharks (NPOA- Sharks). The NPOA-Sharks was endorsed by all Australian Governments on 16 April 2004 and was officially launched on 26 May 2004. Australia’s 2004 NPOA-Sharks is based on the findings of a 2001 Shark Assessment Report. The NPOA-Sharks directs action relating to the conservation and management of sharks within Australian waters. Responsibility for implementing actions under the NPOA-Sharks, as well as broader responsibility for shark conservation and management, lies with each jurisdiction (i.e. the states, Northern Territory and the Commonwealth). In 2009 the Shark Assessment Report was updated to assess the status of shark conservation and management in Australia. The 2009 Shark Assessment Report contributed to a review of the 2004 NPOA-Sharks and has assisted in the development of a revised NPOA-Sharks.