DOCSLIB.ORG

Architect – Engineer Qualifications

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Architect – Engineer Qualifications ARCHITECT – ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS PART I – CONTRACT SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS A. CONTRACT INFORMATION 1. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) SAO -Claims Analysis and Dispute Resolution Consultant List , Columbus OHIO 2. PUBLIC NOTICE DATE 3. SOLICITATION OR PROJECT NUMBER March 4,2011 DAS-11D888 B. ARCHITECT – ENGINEER POINT OF CONTACT 4. NAME AND TITLE Jack Kelly, III, Vice President 5. NAME OF FIRM URS Corporation 6. TELEPHONE NUMBER 7. FAX NUMBER 8. E-MAIL ADDRESS 215.587.9000 215.587.0668 john [email protected] C. PROPOSED TEAM (Complete this section for the prime contractor and all key subcontractors.) (Check) 11. ROLE IN THIS 9. FIRM NAME 10. ADDRESS J-V J-V CONTRACT PRIME SUBCON- SUBCON- PARTNER TRACTOR 8 Penn Center, 21st Floor Claims Assessment Consultant URS 1628 John F. Kennedy Blvd And Damages Assessment – a. Philadelphia, PA 19103 Overall Management of Contract [ ] CHECK IF EDGE CERTIFIED [] CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE URS 277 West Nationwide Blvd. Architectural and Engineering b. Columbus, OH 43215 Technical Support [ ] CHECK IF EDGE CERTIFIED [] CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE Foster Plaza 4 Specialized Cost Estimating for URS 501 Holiday Drive Trade Disciplines c. Suite 300 [ ] CHECK IF EDGE CERTIFIED [] CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE URS 400 Northpark Town Center Claims Analysis Consultant 1000 Abernathy Road, NE d. Suite 900 Atlanta, GA 30328 [ ] CHECK IF EDGE CERTIFIED [ ] CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE e. [ ] CHECK IF EDGE CERTIFIED [ ] CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE The URS team offers State Architect’s Office unmatched accessibility and capabilities. With a staff comprised of more than 700 professional and technical employees in the State of Ohio alone, we are able to provide our clients the full range of professional services utilizing our extensive in- house resources. In order to provide State Architect’s Office with the best possible team, we have selected team members that specialize in each of the disciplines identified in the Request for Qualifications dated March 4,20011. URS’s extensive relevant experience, coupled with URS’s depth of resources makes us the ideal firm to manage the proposed SAO -Claims Analysis and Dispute Resolution Consultant List project. D. ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF PROPOSED TEAM [] (Attached) F110-330v0208 – STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS (SF330) Page 12 of 19 Claims Analysis & Dispute Resolution Services PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE John W. Kelly, III PROJECT MANAGER Fran Sabatino, PSP TECHNICAL SUPPORT CLAIM COST ANALYSIS CONSULTANTS SERVICES Architectural Edward Vella Senior Manager Michael Burkey, AIA, NCARB John Lamutt, PE Donald Lange Carol Repoley Structural Vince Vaulman, CCE Structural Andy Knapke, PE, SE Rob D’Onofrio, PE Eric Link Paul Bough Mechanical John Orr, PSP Mechanical Joe Riddle, PE, LEED AP, NCEE Wayne Rowbotham, PE Leonard Calianno Electrical Electrical David Bals, PE Larry Baranowski F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S 20. EXAMPLE PROJECT QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT KEY NUMBER 01 21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED World Trade Center Reconstruction PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) New York, New York Ongoing Ongoing 23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Port Authority of New York & Lucy Foster 212-435-5526 New Jersey Assistant Director of WTC Construction 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and cost) Relevance to the Proposed Project: . On Call Construction Claims Analysis . Schedule Review and Delay Impact Analysis . Change Order Impacts . Labor Productivity Analysis . Cost and Damage Analysis of Claim Damages Project Description: URS serving as an ex tension of staff for the Port Authority is responsible for the review, analysis, and evaluation of all construction claims made against the Owner. To date claims have be en reviewed relating to One World Trade Center (formerly “The Freedom Tower”), the new Transportation Hub, the September 11 th Memorial and various r elated infrastructure projects. The enormous scope of the pro ject and the high cost of each trade contract require real time evaluation and r esolution of construction claims. This is not project that can wait until the end to resolve claims. The current overall estimated cost of the project is in the range of $16 Billion. The issues that have given rise to cla ims include differing subsurface conditions, denied access, design and program change s, changing regu latory requ irements, adjacent projects, and other common causes of claims. The logistically challenging sixteen acre in Lower Manhattan afford s no lay down ar eas and requires clo se working proximity of ad jacent projects. Several projects share common structural elements requiring precise coordination and scheduling. In addition the Port Authority operates the active Port Authority Trans Hudson (PATH) subway line from New Jersey to a temporary station in the midst of the WTC Construction site bringing thousands of commuters through the site on a daily basis. URS works closely Port Autho rity Constru ction, Legal and A ccounting Perso nnel, Program Managers, Construction Manag ers, the claiming trade contractors and their consultants in order develop a comprehensive analysis of each claim. Using the latest CPM Schedule Analysis techniques URS has b een able to id entify the real critical path delay s to the project and the parties responsible for causing delays. URS has taken a proactive role by attending project scheduling and coordination in order to provide early identification of issues that may give rise to claims. W e have also provided claims iden tification training to WTC Construction personnel through a ser ies of lunch time seminars. 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE a. URS Corporation New York, New York Primary Claims Analysts (1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE b. (1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE c. (1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE d. (1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE e. (1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE f. F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S 20. EXAMPLE PROJECT QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT KEY NUMBER 02 21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED Robert Schnatter Center at the University of Pennsylvania PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) Dental School, Philadelphia, PA 2005 2005 23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER University of Pennsylvania Mark Breitenbach 215-898-0665 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and cost) Relevance to the Proposed Project: . Healthcare Facility . Termination of General Contractor . Schedule Analysis . Defended Surety’s Improper Termination Claim Project Description: URS was originally retained by the University of Pennsylvania to assist the U niversity with contract adm inistration and schedule review for the construction of the $25 Million R obert Sch attner C enter for th e Den tal School at t he U niversity o f P ennsylvania. P rior to URS ’ i nitial p roject involvement, the University terminated the general contractor for cause. URS’ role ch anged af ter th e ter mination in t hat the con tract administration involved evaluating the entitlement, pricing and schedule impact of numerous alleged changes claimed by the co mpleting co ntractor r etained b y t he s urety. I n ad dition, UR S acted as a n exte nsion o f t he U niversity’s sta ff and performed co nstruction inspections and reviewed the monthly schedule updates submitted by the co mpleting contractor. Many of the changes alleged by the completing contractor resulted from the surety’s failure to disclose the complete scope of remaining work including correction of defective or incomplete work. In res ponse t o t he su rety’s c laim o f improper t ermination, the U niversity requ ested U RS to eva luate the U niversity’s decision to ter minate t he con tractor. T he caus e for ter mination was the co ntractor’s failure to p erform the work i n accordance with th e proj ect schedule. UR S als o deter mined that t he orig inal con tractor w as res ponsible for ex tensive defective and deficient work during the time that it performed construction at the project. UR S evaluated the impacts on the project schedule caused by the various delaying events and actions or inactio n, including the potential i mpact of th e correction of defective work on the project schedule. URS su pported an d p rovided cl aims ass istance t o ou tside Co unsel f or t he Uni versity in t he def ense o f a $21M cl aim asserted by the surety for improper termination. The surety alleged that the ter mination was improper due to the primary issues of involved alleged defective design, excessive owner changes and construction delay caused by the owner. URS played a key role in negotiating a r esolution of the surety’s claim. T he end result was a settlement that was favorable for the University. 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE URS Corporation Philadelphia, PA Claims consultant, owner’s a. representative, schedule analyst, and litigation support (1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE b. (1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE c. (1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE d. (1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE e.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bradley D. Giles
    BRADLEY D. GILES EDUCATION: M.S., Industrial Safety Southern Illinois University, 1978 B.S., Education Southern Illinois University, 1976 SUMMARY: Mr. Giles has over 40 years of experience in management and leadership in Environmental, Safety, Health and Security Services in multi-national engineering, construction, mining and government management industries. He is the Principal for Bradley Giles and Associates, providing experienced safety counsel to industry. CERTIFICATIONS: Board of Certified Safety Professionals Certified Safety Professional 1988 Institution of Occupational Safety and Health Graduate Member 2012 Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Board of Registration of Professional Engineers and of Land Surveyors, P.E., 1993 Board of Certified Safety Professionals, Safety Trained Supervisor 2009 Illinois Department of Mines and Minerals, Surface Supervisor, 1979 MSHA Underground and Surface Instructor (G.A. and G.B.), 1976 CLEARANCE: DOE “Q” Clearance ASSOCIATIONS: American Society of Safety Engineers National Construction Safety Executives Council National Safety Council American Industrial Hygiene Association National Society of Professional Engineers YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 40 CAREER OVERVIEW: Mr. Giles has over 40 years of Environmental, Safety, Health & Security (ESH&S) management and engineering experience. He is a professional member of the American Society of Safety Engineers (ASSE), a Certified Safety Professional (CSP), a Registered Professional Engineer (PE), a Graduate member of IOSH, a Safety Trained Supervisor (STS) and possesses a Master of Science Degree in Industrial Safety. He was elected as a Director at Large for the ASSE Board of Directors, 2015-2018. Mr. Giles was elected to the Board of Directors for the Board of Certified Safety Professionals, 2004-2010 and elected Vice President for 2008 and President for 2009, currently serves as an ambassador and is a member of the National Safety Advisory Committee for the Associated General Contractors (AGC) of America.
    [Show full text]
  • URS Fact Sheet 2008-06.Indd
    Fact Sheet Key Facts Business Sectors z More than 50,000 employees Infrastructure z Operations in more than 30 countries z Air Transportation z A professional staff of engineers and technical z Surface Transportation specialists with expertise in the full spectrum z Rail and Transit of engineering and environmental disciplines, z Ports and Harbors as well as planners, scientists, information z Water/Wastewater management specialists, architects, program z Facilities and construction managers, and construction Power contractors z Coal-fi red z Serves U.S. state and local agencies, and z Nuclear governments in Europe, Asia-Pacifi c and the z Hydroelectric Middle East on infrastructure projects involving z Renewable surface, air, mass transit and rail transportation; ports and harbors; public buildings and water/ Industrial and Commercial wastewater facilities z Oil and Gas z Provides complete services from front-end z Chemical and Pharmaceutical studies through engineering, procurement z Mining and construction to facility management and z Manufacturing Overview production maintenance for industrial clients worldwide Federal URS Corporation is a fully integrated z z Serves industrial clients in the automotive, Defense engineering, construction and chemical, consumer products, food and z Homeland Security technical services organization with beverage, forest products, manufacturing, z Environmental and Nuclear Management the capabilities to support the full mining, oil and gas, pharmaceutical, power and project life cycle—from inception
    [Show full text]
  • Final Assessment Urs Corporation
    FINAL ASSESSMENT URS CORPORATION The following pages contain the detailed scoring for your company based on public information. The following table represents a summary of your scores: Topic Number of % score based questions on public information Leadership, Governance and Organisation 10 60% Risk Management 5 50% Company Policy and Codes 12 75% Training 5 40% Personnel and Helplines 7 71.4% Total 39 62.8% TI has found no evidence that the company is involved in offsets and has therefore removed the two relevant questions (A13a and A13b). URS CORPORATION 10/05/14 WWW.URS.COM A1: Does the company publish a statement from the Chief Executive Officer or the Chair of the Board supporting the ethics and anti-corruption agenda of the company? Score: 0 Comments: Based on public information, there is no readily available evidence that the company publishes a statement from the CEO or Chairman supporting the ethics and anti-corruption agenda of the company. TI notes the statement in the Annual Report but does not assess this to be a strong enough statement to score here. References: Public: TI notes: Annual Report (2013), p.2: ‘Message from Martin M. Koffel, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. We have a diversified business, with competitive positions in a balanced mix of long-term markets— federal, oil and gas, infrastructure, power, and industrial—and an unrelenting focus on professional excellence, client service, quality, safety, and ethics.’ http://media.corporate- ir.net/media_files/IROL/89/89381/2013%20URS%20Annual%20Report.pdf URS CORPORATION 10/05/14 WWW.URS.COM A2: Does the company’s Chief Executive Officer or the Chair of the Board demonstrate a strong personal, external facing commitment to the ethics and anti-corruption agenda of the company? Score: 0 Comments: Based on public information, there is no readily available evidence that the company’s CEO or Chairman demonstrate a strong personal, external facing commitment to the ethics and anti-corruption agenda of the company.
    [Show full text]
  • Urs Corp /New/ (Urs) 10-K/A
    URS CORP /NEW/ (URS) 10-K/A Annual report pursuant to section 13 and 15(d) Filed on 02/28/2008 Filed Period 02/27/2008 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 _________________________ FORM 10-K/A Amendment No. 1 _________________________ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 28, 2007 OR TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the Transition Period from _____ to _____ Commission file number 1-7567 _________________________ URS CORPORATION (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 94-1381538 (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 600 Montgomery Street, 26th Floor San Francisco, California 94111-2728 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) (415) 774-2700 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Name of each exchange on Title of each class: which registered: Common Shares, par value $.01 per share New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes x Noo Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes o Nox Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Apptis Press Release
    Contacts: URS Corporation Sard Verbinnen & Co Sam Ramraj Hugh Burns/Jamie Tully/Meghan Stafford Vice President (212) 687-8080 Investor Relations (415) 774-2700 Apptis Roddy Young MSLGROUP on behalf of Apptis, Inc. (202) 261-2867 URS TO ACQUIRE FEDERAL IT SERVICES PROVIDER APPTIS HOLDINGS, INC. Transaction Enables URS to Provide High-Growth Cyber Security and Cloud Computing Services Apptis Expected to Expand Opportunities with Existing and New Federal Clients SAN FRANCISCO, CA and CHANTILLY, VA– April 27, 2011 – URS Corporation (NYSE: URS) and Apptis Holdings, Inc., a leading provider of information technology and communications services to the federal government, announced today that they have signed a definitive agreement under which URS will acquire Apptis for a net purchase price of approximately $260 million in cash. Apptis, which is majority owned by affiliates of New Mountain Capital and headquartered in Chantilly, Virginia, provides high-end IT services to the U.S. Department of Defense, including all four branches of the military and the Defense Information Systems Agency, and to other federal entities, including the Departments of State, Transportation, Justice, and Homeland Security. The company has staff of approximately 1,000 seasoned professionals working from offices in 35 states and nine international locations. In 2010, Apptis had revenues of $298.2 million. Apptis specializes in high-end professional IT services, which are expected to be among the highest growth areas within the broader federal IT market. These services include network management, software engineering, IT infrastructure design and implementation, identity management, cyber defense and cloud computing technologies. The company has full range of integrated cyber security capabilities for computer and telephony networks, including engineering support, and communication, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance services.
    [Show full text]
  • Anticipated Acquisition by AECOM Technology Corporation of URS Corporation
    Anticipated acquisition by AECOM Technology Corporation of URS Corporation ME/6464-14 The CMA’s decision on reference under section 33(1) given on 14 October 2014. Full text of the decision published on 12 November 2014. Please note that the square brackets indicate figures or text which have been deleted or replaced in ranges at the request of the parties for reasons of commercial confidentiality. Summary 1. The parties concerned are AECOM Technology Corporation (AECOM) and URS Corporation (URS), together the ‘Parties’. The Parties provide a range of engineering design and construction consultancy services to public and private clients globally. The effect of the transaction (hereafter referred to as the ‘Merger’) is that URS will become a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of AECOM. 2. The Merger results in the creation of a relevant merger situation as the two enterprises, AECOM and URS, will cease to be distinct and the Merger satisfies the turnover test. 3. In the UK, the Parties overlap in engineering consultancy services across four general areas: General Building, Environmental, Water and Transportation. For the purposes of the competitive assessment, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) considered these general areas and 18 subsectors into which they can be divided. Based on the evidence available to it, the CMA considers that there are many competitors in each subsector, with several companies offering a similar range of services as the Parties. Based on share of supply data from an industry market report submitted by the Parties, the combined shares of the Parties when considering a narrow frame of reference would be 11% in all but one subsector, or there would be only a small incremental increase in supply post-Merger.
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 Annual Report WE DELIVER I 2009 KBR Annu a L Repo
    WE DELIVER WE 2009 Annual Report WE DELIVER I 2009 KBR AnnuAl RepoRt www.kbr.com I 713-753-2000 I Houston, Texas 77002 Texas Houston, I 601 Jefferson Street 601 Jefferson t Board of Directors (back row, from left to right) Lester L. Lyles – Audit Committee; Health, Safety and Environment Committee John R. Huff – Compensation Committee; Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Jeffrey E. Curtiss – Audit Committee (Chair); Health, Safety and Environment Committee Richard J. Slater – Health, Safety and Environment Committee (Chair); Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (front row, from left to right) Loren K. Carroll – Audit Committee; Compensation Committee (Chair) William P. Utt – Chairman W. Frank Blount – Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (Chair); Compensation Committee Business Group Officers Corporate Officers Hydrocarbons: tim Challand – President, Technology Mitch Dauzat – President, Gas Monetization Roy oelking – President, Oil & Gas John Quinn – President, Downstream Infrastructure, Government, and Power: Bill Bodie – President, North America Government & Defense Colin elliott – President, Infrastructure & Minerals Andrew pringle – President, International Government & Defence 2009 KBR Awards William P. Utt Klaudia J. Brace tom Vaughn – President, Power & Industrial Chairman of the Senior Vice President, KBR Honored with Construction Users Roundtable KBR Ranked #19 in the Houston Chronicle’s Services: Board, President, and Administration Chief Executive Officer Workforce Development Award Top 100 Companies luther Cochrane – Senior Vice President and Chairman, Building Group Brian Cole – Vice President, Canada Operations Darrell Hargrave – Senior Vice President, Industrial Services KBR Awarded Safety Excellence Awards KBR Ranked as Sixth Largest Healthcare Randy Walker – Senior Vice President, U.S. Construction Builder in the U.S. Jim parson – Vice President, International Construction KBR Named to Fortune’s Top 500 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Service and Post-Pandemic Planning for Capital Programs PROGRAM and PROJECT MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS
    Return to Service and Post-Pandemic Planning for Capital Programs PROGRAM AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS Partnering with clients to safely deliver capital programs and projects in a pandemic environment, with a safe return to operations and solutions for the new normal. Americas SECTIONADDRESSING TITLE THE CHALLENGES OF OUR NEW NORMAL ◀ RETURN TO SERVICE: PROGRAM AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT As program management operations begin or resume in the new normal, and construction sites become active once again, owners are ADDRESSING THE facing unprecedented return-to-operations challenges. New safety procedures often indicate a possible need for renewed program planning and program reassessment to avoid cost and schedule impacts. These activities may include project re-prioritization, reassessment of CHALLENGES OF the program risk analysis and risk mitigation strategies, and schedule adjustments associated with revised construction durations and sequencing. OUR NEW NORMAL: Managing capital programs during a pandemic also comes with a new measure of success: safely guiding the delivery of projects in a pandemic environment. Employees and contractors must adhere to PROGRAM PLANNING program-specific, local, state and federal COVID-19-related safety guidelines. AECOM program managers keep pace with these ever- evolving guidelines, and facilitate the establishment and implementation of procedures for various program participants, to assist in overseeing AND REASSESSMENT safety compliance. We have the expertise and technologies to rapidly provide a program
    [Show full text]
  • Urs Corporation
    Created on : 08/10/2011 12:58:41 © FEDMINE™ All Rights Reserved Email: [email protected] URL: www.fedmine.us ● Hyperlinks in FEDMINE HTML & PDF documents work for subscribers only. You may request a FREE TRIAL to view all reports in the system ● Parent & subsidiary company relationships are no longer included in the FPDS-NG data in order to honor the Federal Government’s licensing agreement with Dun & Bradstreet. For that reason it is possible those relationships do not reflect the most current status in our system Contracts Data Updated on: FEDMINE.US™ Parent Company Profile 2011-07-30 01:31:39 URS CORPORATION AWARDS IN FEDBIZOPPS CONTRACT AWARDS BY CONTRACTING OFFICE CONTRACT AWARDS BY PLACE OF PERFORMANCE LAST 30 DAYS CONTRACT AWARDS ORGANIZATION DETAILS COMPARATIVE 7-YEAR FEDERAL CONTRACTS VIEW - BY EACH SUBSIDIARY DUNS 043271568 2011 2010 2009 Parent DUNS 043271568 SUBSIDIARIES Fedmine ID F00270223 007507879 - URS GROUP, INC. $0 $0 $246,377 Address 600 MONTGOMERY ST FL 26 SAN FRANCISCO 007900517 - URS ENERGY & CONSTRUCTION, INC. CA 94111-2702 $40,889,740 $142,178,502 $22,971,023 USA 009290573 - URS GROUP, INC. GEO LOCATION : FEDPOINT $1,836,242 $25,247,438 $720,681 009338377 - URS GROUP, INC County San Francisco $196,406 $1,842,650 $0 010852259 - URS GROUP, INC. Incorporation DE $0 $0 $0 Organization CORPORATE NOT TAX 019095806 - WASHINGTON GROUP INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED Type EXEMPT - $0 $0 $0 020981218 - WASHINGTON INTERNATIONAL, INC. Employees 45,000 $0 $0 $0 Annual Revenue $ 8,241,000,000 023879831 - LEAR SIEGLER SERVICES, INC. CCR Regist. 2002-01-15 $167,685,348 $190,873,552 $154,817,895 CCR Renewal 2010-11-10 030192541 - EG&G TECHNICAL SERVICES INC $0 $1,127,180 $220,040 Company NONE Security 042628664 - WASHINGTON DEMILITARIZATION COMPANY, LLC Employee $96,753,232 $-60,001,664 $0 NONE Security 043271568 - URS CORPORATION $390,282 $8,648,380 $3,174,017 Contact Information 049208940 - WASHINGTON DEMILITARIZATION COMPANY, LLC CEO Name: MARTIN M KOFFEL $0 $0 $0 CEO Phone: (415) 774-2700 049575285 - URS GROUP, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Securities and Exchange Commission Washington, D.C
    Use these links to rapidly review the document TABLE OF CONTENTS ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K (Mark one) ☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 OR o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission file number 0-52423 AECOM (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 61-1088522 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or Identification No.) organization) 1999 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 2600 Los Angeles, California 90067 (Address of principal executive offices, including zip code) (213) 593-8000 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of Each Class Name of Exchange on Which Registered Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. ☒ Yes o No Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. o Yes ☒ No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release
    Press Release Amsterdam, the Netherlands / 1 August 2013 8:30 AM URS / Weitz Joint Company Awarded Mechanical, Electrical and Instrumentation Erection Works Contract for Iowa Fertilizer Company Orascom E&C USA Inc. (OEC USA), OCI N.V’s wholly owned engineering and construction subsidiary based in the United States, announced today that it has awarded RW Constructors LLC a subcontract to execute Mechanical, Electrical, and Instrumentation (MEI) erection works at the Iowa Fertilizer Company (Iowa Fertilizer). RW Constructors is a 50/50 special purpose company formed between Rust Constructors Inc., a URS Corporation subsidiary, and The Weitz Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of OCI N.V., to execute the MEI erection works for the ammonia, urea, ammonium nitrate, nitric acid, and urea ammonium nitrate Inside Battery Limit plants at Iowa Fertilizer. Robert W. Zaist, President of Energy & Construction for URS Corporation, stated, “URS and OCI have an outstanding record of cooperation and project delivery, and we are pleased to bring the combined experience and resources of our two companies together to deliver Iowa Fertilizer and other major industrial projects to clients in the North American market.” Osama Bishai, OCI Construction Group Chief Operating Officer, commented: “This is the last major construction subcontract to be awarded at Iowa Fertilizer, and we are on track to complete construction works in the summer of 2015. Having worked extensively with URS in the Middle East on 16 projects valued at nearly US$ 720 million over more than 20 years, we are proud to capitalize on our long-standing legacy of successful partnerships with URS.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release
    For Immediate Release NR 14-0903 Media Contact: Investor Contact: Press Release Paul Gennaro Paul Cyril SVP & Chief Communications Officer SVP, Investor Relations 212.973.3167 213.593.8322 [email protected] [email protected] AECOM announces the offering of US$1.6 billion in senior unsecured notes maturing during 2022 and 2024 LOS ANGELES (Sept. 10, 2014) — AECOM Technology Corporation (NYSE:ACM), the world’s #1-ranked engineering design firm, announced today its intention to offer, subject to market and other conditions, US$1.6 billion in aggregate principal amount of its senior notes maturing in 2022 and 2024 (the “senior notes”). AECOM intends to use the net proceeds from the offering of the senior notes, together with cash on hand and borrowings under its new senior secured credit facilities, to repay certain existing indebtedness and to fund all of the cash consideration of the proposed acquisition of URS Corporation pursuant to the merger agreement dated July 11, 2014. The senior notes will be issued in a private offering to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and to non-U.S. persons in offshore transactions in reliance on Regulation S under the Securities Act. Any offer of the senior notes will be made only by means of a private offering memorandum. The senior notes are not being registered under the Securities Act, or the securities laws of any other jurisdiction, and, unless so registered, may not be offered or sold in the United States without registration or an applicable exemption from registration requirements.
    [Show full text]