Local Environment Agency Plan
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Suffolk Moth Group Newsletter
Suffolk Moth Group Newsletter Issue 24 - November 2001 Edited by Tony Prichard In this issue Editorial Suffolk Moth Group Indoor Meeting 2002 Directory of Suffolk moth recorders - update Phyllonorcyter platani - a new moth for Suffolk Gelechia senticetella - another new moth for Suffolk National Moth Night 2002 Suffolk Moth Group - Email group set up Exporting Data from Mapmate for Submission of Moth Records Records and Intellectual Property Rights A Great Moth Trapping Expedition in Suffolk - by Jon Clifton A few Loxostege sticticalis records in September Of Marriage and Micro's - The Further Trials and Tribulations of the Thurston Recorder - Paul Bryant Reports from recorders around the county Eye, August - October - Paul Kitchener Ipswich Golf Course, June - Neil Sherman Ipswich Golf Course, July - Neil Sherman Fressingfield, Eye - P Vincent Moths at Parham - August - Tony Prichard Field reports Contact details Adverts Editorial Another season draws to an end and a bit of an odd one at that (as they all seem to be at the moment). Yet another warm spring enabled a few of us to get out and about around the county a few times in February. This came to abrupt end with the restrictions imposed by the outbreak of Foot and Mouth. The restrictions only started easing in May meaning that the SMG larval hunt at West Stow had to be transferred to Milden Hall farm (thanks to Juliet Hawkins for allowing us on her farm at short notice). Poor weather over this period meant that species were quite late in emerging giving the impression that flight periods were late and extended with numbers of moths recorded down. -
233 08 SD50 Environment Permitting Decision Document
Environment Agency permitting decisions Bespoke permit We have decided to grant the permit for Didlington Farm Poultry Unit operated by Mr Robert Anderson, Mrs Rosamond Anderson and Mr Marcus Anderson. The permit number is EPR/EP3937EP. We consider in reaching that decision we have taken into account all relevant considerations and legal requirements and that the permit will ensure that the appropriate level of environmental protection is provided. Purpose of this document This decision document: • explains how the application has been determined • provides a record of the decision-making process • shows how all relevant factors have been taken into account • justifies the specific conditions in the permit other than those in our generic permit template. Unless the decision document specifies otherwise we have accepted the applicant’s proposals. Structure of this document • Key issues • Annex 1 the decision checklist • Annex 2 the consultation, web publicising responses. EPR/EP3937EP/A001 Page 1 of 12 Key Issues 1) Ammonia Impacts There are two Special Areas for Conservation (SAC) within 3.4km, one Special Protection Area (SPA) within 850m, seven Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) within 4.9km and six Local Wildlife Sites (LWS) within 1.4km of the facility, one of which is within 250m. Assessment of SAC and SPA If the Process Contribution (PC) is below 4% of the relevant critical level (CLe) or critical load (CLo) then the farm can be permitted with no further assessment. Initial screening using Ammonia Screening Tool (AST) v4.4 has indicated that the PC for Breckland SAC, Norfolk Valley Fens SAC and Breckland SPA is predicted to be greater than 4% of the CLe for ammonia. -
Coarse Fishing Close Season on English Rivers
Coarse fishing close season on English rivers Appendix 1 – Current coarse fish close season arrangements The close season on different waters In England, there is a coarse fish close season on all rivers, some canals and some stillwaters. This has not always been the case. In the 1990s, only around 60% of the canal network had a close season and in some regions, the close season had been dispensed with on all stillwaters. Stillwaters In 1995, following consultation, government confirmed a national byelaw which retained the coarse fish close season on rivers, streams, drains and canals, but dispensed with it on most stillwaters. The rationale was twofold: • Most stillwaters are discrete waterbodies in single ownership. Fishery owners can apply bespoke angling restrictions to protect their stocks, including non-statutory close times. • The close season had been dispensed with on many stillwaters prior to 1995 without apparent detriment to those fisheries. This presented strong evidence in favour of removing it. The close season is retained on some Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs) and the Norfolk and Suffolk Broads, as a precaution against possible damage to sensitive wildlife - see Appendix 1. This consultation is not seeking views on whether the close season should be retained on these stillwaters While most stillwater fishery managers have not re-imposed their own close season rules, some have, either adopting the same dates as apply to rivers or tailoring them to their waters' specific needs. Canals The Environment Agency commissioned a research project in 1997 to examine the evidence around the close season on canals to identify whether or not angling during the close season was detrimental to canal fisheries. -
Suffolk Wildlife Trust Limited
Registered number: 00695346 Charity number: 262777 SUFFOLK WILDLIFE TRUST LIMITED TRUSTEES' REPORT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2020 SUFFOLK WILDLIFE TRUST LIMITED CONTENTS Page Reference and administrative details of the Trust, its Trustees and advisers 1 Trustees' report 2 - 14 Independent auditors' report on the financial statements 15 - 17 Consolidated statement of financial activities 18 Consolidated balance sheet 19 Trust balance sheet 20 Consolidated statement of cash flows 21 Notes to the financial statements 22 - 45 SUFFOLK WILDLIFE TRUST LIMITED REFERENCE AND ADMINISTRATIVE DETAILS OF THE TRUST, ITS TRUSTEES AND ADVISERS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2020 Trustees Nigel Farthing, Chairman Peter Holborn (resigned 26 October 2019) Stephanie Jones John Cousins (resigned 26 October 2019) Pip Goodwin Simon Roberts James Alexander, Treasurer Rachel Eburne (resigned 5 September 2019) David Alborough Anna Saltmarsh Philip Newton Susan Hooton (appointed 26 October 2019) Company registered number 00695346 Charity registered number 262777 Registered office Brooke House The Green Ashbocking Ipswich Suffolk IP6 9JY Chief executive officer Julian Roughton (resigned 29 May 2020) Independent auditors Larking Gowen LLP Chartered Accountants 1 Claydon Business Park Great Blakenham Ipswich IP6 0NL Bankers Barclays Bank PLC Princes Street Ipswich IP1 1PB Solicitors Birketts Providence House 141-145 Princes Street Ipswich IP1 1QJ Page 1 SUFFOLK WILDLIFE TRUST LIMITED TRUSTEES' REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2020 The Trustees present their annual report together with the audited financial statements of the Suffolk Wildlife Trust Limited for the year 1 April 2019 to 31 March 2020. The Annual report serves the purposes of both a Trustees' report and a directors' report under company law. -
2019 No.146 August
The Norfolk Natterjack AUGUST 2019 Number 146 . Researching The quarterly bulletin Norfolk s Wildlife of the Norfolk & Norwich Naturalists’ Society www.nnns.org.uk Norfolk & Norwich Naturalists’ Society Founded 1869 Reg. Charity No. 291604 Officers of the Society 2019/20 President: S. Barnes Vice Presidents: Dr R E Baker,A L Bull, R C Hancy, P W Lambley, D I Richmond Chairman: C Chapman, 14 Travers Court, Runton House Close, West Runton, Cromer, NR27 9RA. Tel: 01263 837038 Mobile: 07833463034 Email: [email protected] Secretary: J Emerson, 108 Sleaford Green, Norwich, NR3 3JT. Tel: 01603 961939 Email: [email protected] Assistant Secretary: F J L Farrow (address below) Treasurer: Position vacant Assistant Treasurer: J Froud (address below) Membership Committee: J Hubbard, 30 Church Lane, Hindolveston, Dereham, Norfolk, NR20 5BT Tel: 07713 681406 Email: [email protected] Secretary: J Froud, Westward Ho, 4 Kingsley Road, Norwich, NR1 3RB. Tel: 01603 440444 Email: [email protected] Programme Committee: Ms D L Cheyne, Wood House, Free Lane, Ditchingham, Bungay, NR35 2DW. Tel: 01986 894277 Secretary: Dr S R Martin, 3 St John's Close, Hethersett, Norwich, NR9 3DQ. Tel: 01603 810327 Email: [email protected] Publications Committee: Dr A R Leech, 3 Eccles Road, Holt, NR25 6HJ. Tel: 01263 712282 Email: [email protected] Secretary: Dr J Parmenter, Alpha House, 37 Station Road, Reedham, Norfolk NR13 3TB. Tel: 07710252468 Email: [email protected] Editor, Transactions: Dr N W Owens, 22 Springfield Close, Weybourne, Holt, NR25 7TB. Tel: 01263 588410 Email: [email protected] Editors, Bird & Mammal Report: Birds: A M Stoddart, 7 Elsden Close, Holt, NR25 6JW. -
Display PDF in Separate
environment agency plan ELY OUSE LEAP FIRST ANNUAL REVIEW DECEMBER 2000 E n v i r o n m e n t A g e n c y NATIONAL LIBRARY & INFORMATION SERVICE ANGLIAN REGION Kingfisher House, Goldhay Way. Orton Goldhay, Peterborough PE2 SZR En v ir o n m e n t Ag e n c y Ely Ouse LEAP First Annual Review Map 1 E n v ir o n m e n t A g e n c y Ely Ouse Area Location KEY Plan boundary Main river Built up area Ely Ouse Plan Area Regional Boundary LEAP boundary Produced from Ordnance Survey Maps under licence granted by the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. Licence No GD03177G0001 © Ordnance Survey 1998 TF qo TC 10 20 Ely Ouse Local Environment Agency Plan JOkm _ | -----1-----1-----L TF oo -00TC TL TM Sw a n g ey I °™in ATTLEBOROUGH ! - SO Plan boundary Main river Built up area Ely Ouse LEAP - First Annual Review November 2000 Recreation and navigation enhancements in the Ely Ouse LEAP area New moorings have been constructed on the Ely Ouse as part of the Littleport Riverside Regeneration Scheme (Section 2.8.3 refers) Work in progress on the new lock at Denver, which is due to open in spring 2001. (Section 2.8.3 refers) The new Cuckoo Bridge is lowered into place near Ely, to form part of the Fen Rivers Way and Hereward Way footpaths. (Section 2.8.2 refers) ENVIRONMENT AGENCY 090099 VISION Most societies want to achieve economic development to secure a better quality of life, now and in the future, whilst still protecting the environment. -
Newsletter No.7 January 2011 Promoting Suffolk's Earth Heritage
Newsletter No.7 January 2011 Welcome to GeoSuffolk Times , keeping you up- Have you visited …. to-date with geodiversity news, achievements Butley Forest pit in winter? and activities in Suffolk. Please pass it on to On the forest’s edge near Butley lies a colourful anyone who may be interested. surprise – a pit where the Red Crag is exposed Caroline Markham 14.01.11 against a backdrop of blue sky. www.geosuffolk.co.uk There are vertical 5m faces (at right angles) of Bob’s New Year Message horizontally bedded, iron-stained sand. Careful A true tale……‘twas many years ago when I was inspection reveals ‘cross bedding’ indicating sand Geologist at Norwich Castle Museum. Christmas banks on the 2.5 million year old sea bed. In the was just past, the annual fair had gone from upper layers, tube-like trace fossils (perhaps of outside the castle gates, Santa had gone from the lug-worms) are clearly visible. Fossil molluscs shops, and then it happened. Three (I think it from the Red Crag sea - Neptunea contraria, was three from memory) fossil reindeer antlers Glycimeris, Chlamys opercularis and Macoma were brought to me by different people. Was it obliqua and praetenuis , many of them fragile and coincidence or, well, might there have been a real broken, all occur in the talus of the quarry floor . Santa in the Devensian cold stage of the Ice This Forestry Commission open access land may Age? With best wishes for 2011 – RM. be reached by footpath from the road just to the south of Butley Corner (TM367494). -
A Review of the Ornithological Interest of Sssis in England
Natural England Research Report NERR015 A review of the ornithological interest of SSSIs in England www.naturalengland.org.uk Natural England Research Report NERR015 A review of the ornithological interest of SSSIs in England Allan Drewitt, Tristan Evans and Phil Grice Natural England Published on 31 July 2008 The views in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of Natural England. You may reproduce as many individual copies of this report as you like, provided such copies stipulate that copyright remains with Natural England, 1 East Parade, Sheffield, S1 2ET ISSN 1754-1956 © Copyright Natural England 2008 Project details This report results from research commissioned by Natural England. A summary of the findings covered by this report, as well as Natural England's views on this research, can be found within Natural England Research Information Note RIN015 – A review of bird SSSIs in England. Project manager Allan Drewitt - Ornithological Specialist Natural England Northminster House Peterborough PE1 1UA [email protected] Contractor Natural England 1 East Parade Sheffield S1 2ET Tel: 0114 241 8920 Fax: 0114 241 8921 Acknowledgments This report could not have been produced without the data collected by the many thousands of dedicated volunteer ornithologists who contribute information annually to schemes such as the Wetland Bird Survey and to their county bird recorders. We are extremely grateful to these volunteers and to the organisations responsible for collating and reporting bird population data, including the British Trust for Ornithology, the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, the Joint Nature Conservancy Council seabird team, the Rare Breeding Birds Panel and the Game and Wildlife Conservancy Trust. -
Haverhill Sustainability Appraisal Appendices
St Edmundsbury Borough Council Local Plan Haverhill Vision 2031 Submission Draft Document Sustainability Appraisal Report Appendices June 2013 St Edmundsbury Borough Council Local Development Framework Haverhill Vision 2031 Document Sustainability Appraisal Report Appendices June 2013 Notice This report was produced by Atkins for St Edmundsbury Borough Council for the specific purpose of the Haverhill Vision 2031 Document Sustainability Appraisal. This report may not be used by any person other than St Edmundsbury Borough Council without St Edmundsbury Borough Council's express permission. In any event, Atkins accepts no liability for any costs, liabilities or losses arising as a result of the use of or reliance upon the contents of this report by any person other than St Edmundsbury Borough Council. Document History JOB NUMBER: 5081433 DOCUMENT REF: Haverhill Vision Appendices SAR V4.0 4 Updated final MB/ZG ZG/OP OP JF 30/04/13 3 Updated MB OP OP JF 19/03/13 2 Final ZG OP CW CW 23/02/12 1 Draft for Comment OP/CW/Z OP CW CW 13/02/12 G/TH Revisio Purpose Description Originate Checked Reviewed Authorise Date n d d St Edmundsbury Borough Council Local Plan: Haverhill Vision 2031 Document Sustainability Appraisal Report Appendices Contents Appendices Appendix A – Relevant Plans and Policies & Key Sustainability Issues 8 Appendix B – Baseline Data 24 Appendix C – Key Sustainability Issues 44 Appendix D – Assessment of Concept Plan Options, 2012 56 Appendix E – Assessment of Generic Policies 69 Appendix F – Assessment of Policies Relating to -
The Suffolk Hedgerow Survey
THE SUFFOLK HEDGEROW SURVEY By Guy Ackers IT ALL BEGAN IN RIO • The 1992 Rio Earth Summit signed by 172 Nations & included amongst a number of other commitments “The Convention on Biological Diversity” • The British Government response was to require Local Councils to consider how to best safeguard biodiversity in their areas. THE COUNTY RESPONSE. • Suffolk County Council together with a number of other bodies set up the “Suffolk Biodiversity Partnership” (SBP) in order to assess what needed to be done to protect landscape & habitats. • The Partnership produced a number of Action Plans relating to specific habitats & species which were known to be at risk. • One of those Action Plans relates specifically to Hedgerows SUFFOLK COASTAL DISTRICT COUNCIL’S RESPONSE • In order to meet it’s environmental commitments SCDC set up the “Greenprint Forum” • It included a Wide range of representatives from organisations – the Business Sector – Environmental Groups – the Tourist Sector - from Farming – & from Parishes • The Forum wanted to be more than a “talking shop” • The Forum decided that as little was known about how many hedgerows exist, or what species they contained, it should ask a small sub-group of its members to produce guidance that could be used by any community or interest group within the Suffolk Coastal area to undertake a parish-wide hedgerow survey. THE BEGINNINGS OF THE SURVEY • By 1998 the sub-group [The Hedgerow Working Group ] had produced it’s Guidance & Methodology to be it used in parishes in the Suffolk Coastal area. • Parham was the first parish to complete it’s survey & went on to produce a parish Biodiversity Action Plan. -
Last Call for Membership Renewal. Subscriptions Are Now Overdue
Last call for membership renewal. Subscriptions are now overdue. You can find a form on the back page . Two pictures by Alan Baldry—both taken in Christchurch Park. A male goosander and our much loved local tawny owl ‘Mabel,’ together with a grey squirrel that wanted to get in on the shot! The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) is a registered charity: England and Wales—No. 207076, Scotland No. SC037654 WILD IPSWICH -SWIFTS & HOUSE SPARROW PROJECT 2016 from Chris Courtney t’s all just so exciting; the time has that the numbers of sparrows they have I finally arrived, the spring has sprung, seen in their garden, park or allotments the sparrows are chirping and soon the have dramatically reduced from what they swifts will be here too! Screaming away remember five, 10 or 15 years ago. Then as only swifts can! they may recall having noticed just two or three birds, when suddenly one day they And RSPB Ipswich Local Group’s brand realise they haven’t seen as single new Wild Ipswich Swift’s ‘n’ Sparrows sparrow for months! conservation project is now LIVE ! Absence of nest sites due to better So don’t hesitate, grab your House maintained roofs, plastic soffits and Sparrow Questionnaire (copy included bargeboards, loss or degradation of with this magazine), get out there and tell habitats due to over tidy gardens, the loss us what you see and hear! of hedges, shrubs and front gardens paved over for car parking, have all Everyone of our members should at the played their role. -
Non-Technical Summary
St Edmundsbury Borough Council Core Strategy Submission Document Sustainability Appraisal Report Non-Technical Summary Overview of Process and Purpose of Sustainability Appraisal St Edmundsbury Borough Council is preparing a Local Development Framework (LDF) for the Borough, comprising a number of Development Plan Documents (DPDs) that set out the policies and proposals for the development and use of land. As part of the LDF, the Core Strategy DPD will set out the vision, objectives and key policies for the future development of St Edmundsbury. It will supersede the Replacement St Edmundsbury Borough Local Plan. This SA Report has been prepared to fulfil the requirements for SA arising from the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 and the requirements for Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) arising from the SEA Directive. The purpose of SA is to promote sustainable development through better integration of sustainability (economic, social and environmental) considerations in the preparation and adoption of plans. The SEA Directive requires that certain plans and programmes undergo an environmental assessment, due to the likelihood that they will have significant environmental effects once implemented. This Sustainability Appraisal Report (SA Report) accompanies the Core Strategy Submission Document. It builds on the earlier SA work undertaken by the Council for the SA Scoping Report, the initial SA of the Core Strategy Issues and Options document (March 2008) and the SA Report of the Core Strategy Preferred Options and Strategic