Gatekeepers of Addiction?
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Welcome to the New Open Access Neurosci
Editorial Welcome to the New Open Access NeuroSci Lucilla Parnetti 1,* , Jonathon Reay 2, Giuseppina Martella 3 , Rosario Francesco Donato 4 , Maurizio Memo 5, Ruth Morona 6, Frank Schubert 7 and Ana Adan 8,9 1 Centro Disturbi della Memoria, Laboratorio di Neurochimica Clinica, Clinica Neurologica, Università di Perugia, 06132 Perugia, Italy 2 Department of Psychology, Teesside University, Victoria, Victoria Rd, Middlesbrough TS3 6DR, UK; [email protected] 3 Laboratory of Neurophysiology and Plasticity, Fondazione Santa Lucia, and University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00143 Rome, Italy; [email protected] 4 Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Perugia, 06132 Perugia, Italy; [email protected] 5 Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy; [email protected] 6 Department of Cell Biology, School of Biology, University Complutense of Madrid, Av. Jose Antonio Novais 12, 28040 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] 7 School of Biological Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Hampshire PO1 2DY, UK; [email protected] 8 Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, University of Barcelona, 08035 Barcelona, Spain; [email protected] 9 Institute of Neurosciences, University of Barcelona, 08035 Barcelona, Spain * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 6 August 2020; Accepted: 17 August 2020; Published: 3 September 2020 Message from Editor-in-Chief: Prof. Dr. Lucilla Parnetti With sincere satisfaction and pride, I present to you the new journal, NeuroSci, for which I am pleased to serve as editor-in-chief. To date, the world of neurology has been rapidly advancing, NeuroSci is a cross-disciplinary, open-access journal that offers an opportunity for presentation of novel data in the field of neurology and covers a broad spectrum of areas including neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, neuropharmacology, clinical research and clinical trials, molecular and cellular neuroscience, neuropsychology, cognitive and behavioral neuroscience, and computational neuroscience. -
The Creation of Neuroscience
The Creation of Neuroscience The Society for Neuroscience and the Quest for Disciplinary Unity 1969-1995 Introduction rom the molecular biology of a single neuron to the breathtakingly complex circuitry of the entire human nervous system, our understanding of the brain and how it works has undergone radical F changes over the past century. These advances have brought us tantalizingly closer to genu- inely mechanistic and scientifically rigorous explanations of how the brain’s roughly 100 billion neurons, interacting through trillions of synaptic connections, function both as single units and as larger ensem- bles. The professional field of neuroscience, in keeping pace with these important scientific develop- ments, has dramatically reshaped the organization of biological sciences across the globe over the last 50 years. Much like physics during its dominant era in the 1950s and 1960s, neuroscience has become the leading scientific discipline with regard to funding, numbers of scientists, and numbers of trainees. Furthermore, neuroscience as fact, explanation, and myth has just as dramatically redrawn our cultural landscape and redefined how Western popular culture understands who we are as individuals. In the 1950s, especially in the United States, Freud and his successors stood at the center of all cultural expla- nations for psychological suffering. In the new millennium, we perceive such suffering as erupting no longer from a repressed unconscious but, instead, from a pathophysiology rooted in and caused by brain abnormalities and dysfunctions. Indeed, the normal as well as the pathological have become thoroughly neurobiological in the last several decades. In the process, entirely new vistas have opened up in fields ranging from neuroeconomics and neurophilosophy to consumer products, as exemplified by an entire line of soft drinks advertised as offering “neuro” benefits. -
Modafinil and Modafinil Analogues: Free Radical Mechanism of the Eugeroic and Cognitive Enhancment Effect Clifford Fong
Modafinil and modafinil analogues: free radical mechanism of the eugeroic and cognitive enhancment effect Clifford Fong To cite this version: Clifford Fong. Modafinil and modafinil analogues: free radical mechanism of the eugeroic and cognitive enhancment effect. [Research Report] Eigenenergy. 2018. hal-01933737 HAL Id: hal-01933737 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01933737 Submitted on 24 Nov 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Modafinil and modafinil analogues: free radical mechanism of the eugeroic and cognitive enhancment effect Clifford W. Fong Eigenenergy, Adelaide, South Australia. Keywords: Modafinil, modafinil-like analogues, eugeroic effect, cognitive enhancement, free radicals, quantum mechanics Abbreviations Dopamine DA, dopamine transporter DAT, Dissociative electron transfer or attachment DET, Linear free energy relationship LFER, free energy of water desolvation ΔG desolv,CDS , lipophilicity free energy ΔG lipo,CDS, cavity dispersion solvent structure of the first solvation shell CDS, highest occupied molecular orbital HOMO, lowest unoccupied molecular orbital LUMO, multiple correlation coefficient R 2, the F test of significance, standards errors for the estimate (SEE) and standard errors of the variables SE(ΔG desolCDS ), SE(ΔG lipoCDS ), SE(Dipole Moment), SE (Molecular Volume), transition state TS, reactive oxygen species ROS. -
Patterns Of, and Motivations for Illicit Drug Use Among Long Haul
Fatigue and beyond: Patterns of, and motivations for illicit drug use among long haul truck drivers Naomi Richards BPsych (Hons) This thesis is submitted for the degree of Masters of Applied Science (Research) within the Centre for Accident Research and Road Safety-Queensland (CARRS-Q), School of Psychology and Counselling, Queensland University of Technology 2004 Key words Drug use Drug use career Illicit drug use Road safety Truck drivers Abstract Long distance truck drivers are considered a special interest group in terms of drug driving research and policy due to high rates of use, involvement of drugs in truck accidents and the link between drug use and work related fatigue. Qualitative interview data was collected from 35 long haul truck drivers in South East Queensland and analysed using NVivo 2.0. High rates of licit and illicit drug use (particularly amphetamines) were reported. However, unlike previous studies which focus on fatigue, this research found overlapping and changing motivations for drug use during individual lifetimes. Using Becker’s model of a drug use ‘career’ it was revealed that some drivers begin illicit drug use before they begin truck driving. As well as fatigue, powerful motives such as peer pressure, wanting to fit the trucking ‘image’, socialisation, relaxation and addiction were reported. These may need to be considered along side fatigue in the development of effective drug prevention or cessation policies for truck drivers. Contents Page 1. Introduction 1 2. Literature Review 5 2.1. Drugs of concern to road safety 5 2.1.1. Cannabis 6 2.1.1.1. Effects of cannabis on driving performance 7 2.1.2. -
Glutamatergic Synaptic Plasticity in the Mesocorticolimbic System in Addiction
REVIEW ARTICLE published: 20 January 2015 CELLULAR NEUROSCIENCE doi: 10.3389/fncel.2014.00466 Glutamatergic synaptic plasticity in the mesocorticolimbic system in addiction Aile N. van Huijstee and Huibert D. Mansvelder * Department of Integrative Neurophysiology, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands Edited by: Addictive drugs remodel the brain’s reward circuitry, the mesocorticolimbic dopamine (DA) Arianna Maffei, SUNY Stony Brook, system, by inducing widespread adaptations of glutamatergic synapses. This drug-induced USA synaptic plasticity is thought to contribute to both the development and the persistence Reviewed by: Christian Luscher, Geneva of addiction. This review highlights the synaptic modifications that are induced by in vivo University Hospital, University of exposure to addictive drugs and describes how these drug-induced synaptic changes may Geneva, Switzerland contribute to the different components of addictive behavior, such as compulsive drug Fereshteh S. Nugent, Uniformed use despite negative consequences and relapse. Initially, exposure to an addictive drug Services University, USA induces synaptic changes in the ventral tegmental area (VTA). This drug-induced synaptic *Correspondence: Huibert D. Mansvelder, Department potentiation in the VTA subsequently triggers synaptic changes in downstream areas of of Integrative Neurophysiology, the mesocorticolimbic system, such as the nucleus accumbens (NAc) and the prefrontal Center -
Internal State Dependent Odor Processing and Perception—The Role of Neuromodulation in the Fly Olfactory System
REVIEW published: 30 January 2018 doi: 10.3389/fncel.2018.00011 Internal State Dependent Odor Processing and Perception—The Role of Neuromodulation in the Fly Olfactory System Sercan Sayin 1†, Ariane C. Boehm 1,2†, Johanna M. Kobler 1,2†, Jean-François De Backer 1 and Ilona C. Grunwald Kadow 1,2* 1 Neural Circuits and Metabolism, School of Life Sciences, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany, 2 Chemosensory Coding, Max Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Martinsried, Germany Animals rely heavily on their sense of olfaction to perform various vital interactions with an ever-in-flux environment. The turbulent and combinatorial nature of air-borne odorant cues demands the employment of various coding strategies, which allow the animal to attune to its internal needs and past or present experiences. Furthermore, these internal needs can be dependent on internal states such as hunger, reproductive state and sickness. Neuromodulation is a key component providing flexibility under such conditions. Understanding the contributions of neuromodulation, such as sensory neuron sensitization and choice bias requires manipulation of neuronal activity on a local Edited by: and global scale. With Drosophila’s genetic toolset, these manipulations are feasible Christiane Linster, and even allow a detailed look on the functional role of classical neuromodulators Cornell University, United States such as dopamine, octopamine and neuropeptides. The past years unraveled various Reviewed by: mechanisms adapting chemosensory processing and perception to internal states such Thomas Dieter Riemensperger, Department of Molecular as hunger and reproductive state. However, future research should also investigate Neurobiology of Behaviour, Germany the mechanisms underlying other internal states including the modulatory influence Markus Rothermel, RWTH Aachen University, Germany of endogenous microbiota on Drosophila behavior. -
Neurobiology and Behavior (NEURBIO) 1
Neurobiology and Behavior (NEURBIO) 1 Neurobiology and Behavior (NEURBIO) Courses NEURBIO 200A. Research in Neurobiology and Behavior. 2-12 Units. Individual research with Neurobiology and Behavior faculty. Repeatability: Unlimited as topics vary. Restriction: Graduate students only. Neurobiology and Behavior Majors only. NEURBIO 200B. Research in Neurobiology and Behavior. 2-12 Units. Individual research with Neurobiology and Behavior faculty. Prerequisite: NEURBIO 200A Repeatability: Unlimited as topics vary. Restriction: Graduate students only. Neurobiology and Behavior Majors only. NEURBIO 200C. Research in Neurobiology and Behavior. 2-12 Units. Individual research with Neurobiology and Behavior faculty. Prerequisite: NEURBIO 200B Repeatability: Unlimited as topics vary. Restriction: Graduate students only. Neurobiology and Behavior Majors only. NEURBIO 201A. Research in Neurobiology and Behavior. 2-12 Units. Individual research with Neurobiology and Behavior faculty. Grading Option: Satisfactory/unsatisfactory only. Repeatability: Unlimited as topics vary. Restriction: Graduate students only. Neurobiology and Behavior Majors only. NEURBIO 201B. Research in Neurobiology and Behavior. 2-12 Units. Individual research with Neurobiology and Behavior faculty. Prerequisite: NEURBIO 201A Grading Option: Satisfactory/unsatisfactory only. Repeatability: Unlimited as topics vary. Restriction: Graduate students only. Neurobiology and Behavior Majors only. NEURBIO 201C. Research in Neurobiology and Behavior. 2-12 Units. Individual research with Neurobiology and Behavior faculty. Prerequisite: NEURBIO 201B Grading Option: Satisfactory/unsatisfactory only. Repeatability: Unlimited as topics vary. Restriction: Graduate students only. Neurobiology and Behavior Majors only. NEURBIO 202A. Foundations of Neuroscience. 2 Units. Intended to expose students to critical reading and analysis of the primary neuroscience literature. Instructors from departments associated with the Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program participate and discuss topics of current interest. -
Neuroscience Major Requirements (Fall 2017 Or Later)
Neuroscience Major Requirements (Fall 2017 or later) Undergraduate Program in Neuroscience : 1140 Undergrad. Science Bldg. (USB) : http://www.lsa.umich.edu/neurosci : [email protected] : 734-763-7984 (front desk) Why study Neuroscience? Neuroscience is the study of the nervous system. Neuroscientists aim to understand how the nervous system develops and functions on a cellular level as well as the mechanisms that underlie behavior, mental disorders and disease. The faculty teaching courses in the major include cellular and molecular neuroscientists appointed in the Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology (MCDB) and behavioral and cognitive neuroscientists appointed in the Department of Psychology. This interdisciplinary program gives students the best of both of these worlds. Who should major in Neuroscience? Any student who wishes to pursue a career studying the nervous system or behavior. This is an excellent major for anyone interested in pre-health careers, graduate studies, or careers in the biotech industry. Exclusions: Students who elect a major in Neuroscience may not elect the following majors: Biochemistry Biology Biology, Health & Society (BHS) Biomolecular Science (BMS) Biopsychology, Cognition and Neuroscience (BCN) Cellular & Molecular Biology (CMB) CMBS (formerly CMB:BME) Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology (MCDB) Microbiology Plant Biology Students who elect a major in Neuroscience may not elect a minor in Biology, Plant Biology, Chemistry, or Biochemistry. Students can double major in Psychology and Neuroscience or Cognitive Science and Neuroscience, but may only share a maximum of 3 courses between their two programs. How do I declare? Students interested in neuroscience are encouraged to meet with an advisor to discuss their academic plans as soon as possible! Students need not have completed all of the prerequisites of the major to declare, but should usually have completed the biology introductory sequence with a 2.0 or better and be in good academic standing. -
Neuromodulation Shapes Interneuron Communication in the Mouse Striatum
From DEPARTMENT OF NEUROSCIENCE Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden NEUROMODULATION SHAPES INTERNEURON COMMUNICATION IN THE MOUSE STRIATUM Matthijs Constantijn Dorst Stockholm 2020 All previously published papers were reproduced with permission from the publisher. Published by Karolinska Institutet. Printed by US-AB © Matthijs Constantijn Dorst, 2020 ISBN 978-91-7831-908-4 Neuromodulation shapes interneuron communication in the mouse Striatum THESIS FOR DOCTORAL DEGREE (Ph.D.) By Matthijs Constantijn Dorst Principal Supervisor: Opponent: Professor Gilad Silberberg Professor Hagai Bergman Karolinska Institutet The Hebrew University of Jerusalem Department of Neuroscience Edmond & Lily Safra Center for Brain Sciences Co-supervisor(s): Examination Board: Professor Per Uhlén Professor Per Svenningsson Karolinska Institutet Karolinska Institutet Department of Medical Biochemistry and Department of Clinical Neuroscience Biophysics Division of Neuropharmacology - movement disorders Senior lecturer Karima Chergui Karolinska Institutet Department of Physiology and Pharmacology Division of Molecular Neurophysiology Professor Klas Kullander Uppsala Universitet Department of Neuroscience Research group Formation and Function of Neuronal Circuits Included Studies The following studies are included in this thesis, and will be referenced through- out the text as such: Study 1 Garas, F.N., Shah, R.S., Kormann, E., Doig, N.M., Vinciati, F., Nakamura, K.C., Dorst, M.C., Smith, Y., Magill, P.J. and Sharott, A., 2016. Sec- retagogin expression delineates functionally-specialized populations of striatal parvalbumin-containing interneurons. Elife, 5, p.e16088. Study 2 Lindroos, R., Dorst, M.C., Du, K., Filipović, M., Keller, D., Ketzef, M., Kozlov, A.K., Kumar, A., Lindahl, M., Nair, A.G., Pérez-Fernández, J., Grillner, S., Silberberg, G., Kotaleski, J.H., 2018. Basal Ganglia Neuromodulation Over Multiple Temporal and Structural Scales—Simulations of Direct Pathway MSNs Investigate the Fast Onset of Dopaminergic Effects and Predict the Role of Kv4. -
Why Millennials Are Consuming the Best Stimulants at an Accelerating Rate
Why Millennials are Consuming the Best Stimulants at an Accelerating Rate Author : Bruno Souza The sudden spike of internet searches on the best places online to buy modafinil are mainly attributed to millennials. This data seems out of place right next to another statistic that says that millennials are sleeping more hours, compared to other generations. Since Modafinil is one of the best wakefulness promoting agents or stimulants currently available, these two statistics seem inconsistent. Before dismissing one or both of these findings, a closer look at the stats and other variables involved do support these findings. So why are millennials consuming the best stimulants at an accelerating rate? Are Millennials Really Sleeping Better? 1 / 8 A study by the United States Bureau of Labor and statistics show that millennials, or those who were born between 1981 and 1996 (approximately), sleep some 25 minutes longer each night. With an average duration of sleep each night for Americans at 6.8 hours, millennials are within the recommended seven to eight hours of sleep. Another positive data for millennials that came out of this study is that, despite the longer sleep hours, those who are employed are putting in more hours at work. This side data may support the data about stimulants, but more on that later. What may appear as improved sleep quality for millennials does have its naysayers. Some attribute the longer hours of sleep to unemployment as unemployment and underemployment rate among millennials are twice the national average. According to naysayers, this supposed better sleep quality may not be better at all because unemployment is causing an artificial spike in the data. -
Dan Zekzer, M
SHOSHANA EITAN, PH.D. ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR Behavioral and Cellular Neuroscience • Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences Texas A&M University • College Station, TX 77843 Positions and Employment: 1997-2000 Trainee, Norman Cousin Center of Psychoneuroimmunology, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA - Rothschild Foundation Scholar 2000-2002 Post-Doctoral Fellow, Neuropsychiatric Institute, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 2002-2005 Assistant Researcher, Neuropsychiatric Institute, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 2005-2013 Assistant Professor, Behavioral and Cellular Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 2008-present Faculty Member, Texas A&M Institute for Neuroscience (TAMIN), College Station, TX 2013-2017 Associate Professor, Behavioral and Cellular Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 2017-present Associate Professor, Behavioral and Cellular Neuroscience, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX Education: 1997 Ph.D. in Neurobiology, Clore Distinguished Scholar, Neurobiology Department, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel – Clore Distinguished Scholar for Graduate Students 1992 M.Sc. in Neurobiology, Neurobiology Department, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel – Wolf Prize Award for Master Students 1990 B.A. in Biology, Open University, Tel-Aviv, Israel Professional Experiences and Memberships: 1992- present Society of Neuroscience 2005- present Society of Neuroscience, Texas A&M chapter 2005- present Member of the Graduate Faculty at Texas A&M University 2008- present Faculty of Neuroscience, Texas A&M Institute for Neuroscience 2009 Texas A&M-CONACYT: Collaborative Research Grant Program Review Committee 2013-present Editorial Board member, Pain Studies and Treatment (PST) 2014-15 PESCA Peer Review Committee Research Interests: I. Understanding the effects of psychosocial environment and stress on drug abuse, with specific focus on the vulnerabilities of adolescents to opioid abuse. -
Regional Complexity in Enteric Neuron Wiring Reflects Diversity of Motility
RESEARCH ARTICLE Regional complexity in enteric neuron wiring reflects diversity of motility patterns in the mouse large intestine Zhiling Li1, Marlene M Hao2, Chris Van den Haute3,4, Veerle Baekelandt3, Werend Boesmans1,5,6*, Pieter Vanden Berghe1* 1Laboratory for Enteric NeuroScience (LENS), Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; 2Department of Anatomy and Neuroscience, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; 3Laboratory for Neurobiology and Gene Therapy, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; 4Leuven Viral Vector Core, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; 5Department of Pathology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands; 6Biomedical Research Institute (BIOMED), Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium Abstract The enteric nervous system controls a variety of gastrointestinal functions including intestinal motility. The minimal neuronal circuit necessary to direct peristalsis is well-characterized but several intestinal regions display also other motility patterns for which the underlying circuits and connectivity schemes that coordinate the transition between those patterns are poorly understood. We investigated whether in regions with a richer palette of motility patterns, the underlying nerve circuits reflect this complexity. Using Ca2+ imaging, we determined the location *For correspondence: and response fingerprint of large populations of enteric neurons upon focal network