Salisbury Reconnaissance Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Salisbury Reconnaissance Report SALISBURY RECONNAISSANCE REPORT ESSEX COUNTY LANDSCAPE INVENTORY MASSACHUSETTS HERITAGE LANDSCAPE INVENTORY PROGRAM Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation Essex National Heritage Commission PROJECT TEAM Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation Jessica Rowcroft, Preservation Planner Division of Planning and Engineering Essex National Heritage Commission Bill Steelman, Director of Heritage Preservation Project Consultants Shary Page Berg Gretchen G. Schuler Virginia Adams, PAL Local Project Coordinator Lisa Pearson Local Heritage Landscape Participants Jerry Klima Maria Miles Katrina O’Leary Tim Olkahe Lisa Pearson Carolyn Sargent Rachel Toomey May 2005 INTRODUCTION Essex County is known for its unusually rich and varied landscapes, which are represented in each of its 34 municipalities. Heritage landscapes are places that are created by human interaction with the natural environment. They are dynamic and evolving; they reflect the history of the community and provide a sense of place; they show the natural ecology that influenced land use patterns; and they often have scenic qualities. This wealth of landscapes is central to each community’s character; yet heritage landscapes are vulnerable and ever changing. For this reason it is important to take the first steps towards their preservation by identifying those landscapes that are particularly valued by the community – a favorite local farm, a distinctive neighborhood or mill village, a unique natural feature, an inland river corridor or the rocky coast. To this end, the Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR) and the Essex National Heritage Commission (ENHC) have collaborated to bring the Heritage Landscape Inventory program (HLI) to communities in Essex County. The primary goal of the program is to help communities identify a wide range of landscape resources, particularly those that are significant and unprotected. The focus is on landscapes that have not been identified in previous survey efforts in a given community. Another important goal of the program is to provide communities with strategies for preserving heritage landscapes. The methodology for the Heritage Landscape Inventory program was developed in a Pilot Project conducted in southeast Massachusetts. It is outlined in the DCR publication Reading the Land which has provided guidance for the program in Essex County. In short, each participating community appoints a Local Project Coordinator (LPC) to assist the DCR-ENHC consulting team. The LPC organizes a heritage landscape identification meeting at which interested residents and town officials offer community input by identifying potential heritage landscapes. This meeting is followed by a fieldwork session including the consulting team and the LPC, usually accompanied by other community members. This group visits the priority landscapes identified in the meeting and gathers information about the community. The final product is the Reconnaissance Report, prepared for each participating community. It outlines the history of the community; identifies the resources and documentation that provide background information; provides a short description of the priority heritage landscapes visited; discusses planning issues identified by the community; and concludes with a brief discussion of survey and planning recommendations. A list of all of the heritage landscapes identified by the community is included in the Appendix. SALISBURY HISTORY Salisbury’s distinctive inland and coastal landscape features were instrumental in shaping the history of the community from the earliest Native American use of the land to the 19th century farming and later resort activities along the miles of beach front. Massachusetts Heritage Landscape Inventory Program 1 Salisbury Reconnaissance Report Salisbury is home to confirmed Native American sites over the last 3,000 years and it is presumed that there are Contact period sites from the 1500s or early 1600s along the Merrimack River, an inland transportation route. Native Americans that lived in this region were part of the Pawtucket group, locally called Penacook or Pentuckets. The first European settlement occurred in 1638, when the area was called Colchester. In 1640 the name was changed to Salisbury and included a large area of northern Essex County as well as territory in southern New Hampshire. There have been several boundary changes with the last in 1886 when Salisbury Falls and Rocky Hill were annexed to Amesbury to the west. The first meetinghouse was built ca. 1638 at Salisbury Green and a second was constructed in 1665. Agriculture, particularly the production of hay and corn and animal husbandry, were the mainstay of the economy into the early 19th century along with the ancillary grist mills and slaughter houses, of which eight were reported in 1791. Early industries included lumbering (saw mills), ship building and fishing which remained viable until after the War of 1812 when small ports such as Salisbury gave way to larger shipping areas along the New England seacoast. Maritime industries were replaced by textile manufacturing which harnessed the waterpower of the Powwow and Merrimack Rivers. Salisbury Manufacturing Company’s first woolen mill opened in 1812 and had three mills by the 1830s. Most of the textile industry was at Salisbury Falls which eventually was annexed to Amesbury. Small boat building, carriage making and shoe and hat manufacturing contributed to the economy into the late 19th century with carriage and hat manufacturing emerging as significant industries at the turn of the 20th century. In the late 19th century Salisbury Beach became a resort town with hotels, summer cottages and an early amusement park. Some of the early “thrill” rides, such as the Dodgem Car, debuted at Salisbury Beach. Recreational activities continue today along the miles of barrier beach. The shoe industry also was sustained in Salisbury into the mid 1900s with Kristine Shoe Company and Sandlee-Goodman Shoe Company. Early transportation routes followed Native American trails along the north-south Elm Street and the east-west Ferry Road and Seabrook Road. Water travel played a significant role into the 19th century. Ferry boats crossed the Merrimack from Newburyport to Carr Island and Salisbury until the end of the 18th century when the Essex Merrimac Bridge (to Amesbury) and the Newburyport Bridge (Bridge Road) were built over the Merrimack. Bridge Road (Rt. 1), a major north-south route was laid out in 1804 connecting Boston with New Hampshire. The Eastern Railroad line arrived in Newburyport in 1840 and was extended to western Salisbury soon thereafter. In 1847-48 a spur led from this line to East Salisbury parallel to Elm Street. And by 1890 Salisbury’s villages were linked by street railway lines including one that ran the length of Salisbury Beach. Bridges carrying Rt. 1, Rt. 1A and the railroad over the Merrimack River were improved in the early 1900s. In the 1950s Rt. 95 was one more transportation improvement providing faster access to and from Salisbury. Massachusetts Heritage Landscape Inventory Program 2 Salisbury Reconnaissance Report Salisbury’s population in the 1700s rose from about 380 in 1710 to 1,667 at the time of the American Revolution. The population figures fluctuated, rising dramatically to nearly 5,000 in the late 19th century; however these figures are misleading due to several boundary changes resulting in a reduced area of Salisbury by 1886, the main reason for a dramatic population decline from 4,840 residents in 1885 to 1,316. Immigrant groups in the late 19th century were predominately Irish, English, Canadians and Scots. By 1915 there were 1,717 persons and the largest immigrant groups represented were Italians and Canadians. By the mid 20th century population climbed to over 3,000 and more than doubled by the late 1980s to 6,645. Population figures continue to increase substantially to 7,827 reported in 2004. Much of this increase is due to improved access with opportunity to work in Boston or other parts of Essex County and to the conversion of many summer cottages to year-round residences. RESOURCES AND DOCUMENTATION This section of the Reconnaissance Report identifies planning documents and tools that provide information relevant to the Heritage Landscape Inventory program. Inventory of Historic Assets The Massachusetts Historical Commission’s (MHC) Inventory of Historic and Archaeological Assets is a statewide list that identifies significant historic resources throughout the Commonwealth. In order to be included in the inventory, a property must be documented on an MHC inventory form, which is then entered into the MHC database. This searchable database, known as MACRIS, is now available online at http://www.sec.state.ma.us/mhc. According to the MHC, Salisbury’s inventory documents 155 resources dating from 1662 to 1953. Many of the resources are described in area forms that link their histories and context providing a unified history of the town’s development. Documentation was completed in 2001 by professional preservation consultants. State and National Registers of Historic Places The National Register of Historic Places is the official federal list of districts, sites, buildings, structures and objects that have been determined significant in American history, architecture, archaeology, engineering and culture. Salisbury has one property listed in the National Register (NR); Ann’s Diner is listed as part of the Diners of Massachusetts
Recommended publications
  • Newbury Salisbury Ipswich Essex Gloucester
    DEP Environmental Sensitivity Map !Þ Bac k R iv k er o o r B cy Lu NOAA Sensitive Habitat and Biological Resources !Þ !Þ WW S S S S S S S S S S S BSATT HSILL S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S Merrimack River - Ipswich Bay Bla ck w ater Riv S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S erS S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S WRIGHTS S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S ISLANSD S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S SALISBURY PLAINS MUNDY S S S S HISLL S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S TRSUESS S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S ISSLANDS S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S Shoreline Habitat Rankings Human Use Features ver Little Ri S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S
    [Show full text]
  • Town History
    HISTORY OF THE TOWN OF MASON, N.H. FROM THE FIRST GRANT IN 1749, TO THE YEAR 1858 BY JOHN B. HILL __________ BOSTON: LUCIUS A. ELLIOT & CO. D. BUGBEE & CO., BANGOR 1858. HISTORY OF MASON. CHAPTER 1. Captain John Mason; Grants to him of Lands in New Hampshire; Settlements commenced by him; Controversies with Massachusetts respecting the title and jurisdiction; how settled; Title vested in the Masonian proprietors. THE town of Mason is situated in the county of Hillsborough, in the State of New Hampshire. It lies upon the southern border of the State, about midway between the eastern and western extremities of its southern boundary. On the south it bounds upon Townsend and Ashby, on the west upon New Ipswich, on the north upon Temple and Wilton and on the east upon Milford and Brookline. It is in that portion of the State of New Hampshire which was granted by the council of Plymouth in 1621 to Capt. John Mason. As the town derives its name from that gentleman, and the title to the soil therein is in fact derived: and claimed under this grant to him, and sundry subsequent grants in confirmation thereof, and as the State is also indebted to him for its name, it being derived from that Of the county of Hampshire, in England, of whose principal town, Portsmouth, Mason was at one time governor, a brief sketch of his life and of the titles granted to him, and of the various and long-continued controversies to which the uncertain and indefinite descriptions of the boundaries of the original and subsequent grants gave rise, and of the manner in which they were finally settled will not be deemed an inappropriate introduction to these memorials of the place and its people.
    [Show full text]
  • Maps Collection Index
    Martha's Vineyard Museum 59 School Street, Post Office Box 1310, Edgartown, MA 02539 Phone: 508.627.4441 Fax: 508.627.4436 www.mvmuseum.org Maps Collection Aquinnah / Gay Head Region Title Date Description Object ID Location Map of Gay Head that was developed by Joseph T. Pease, Richard L. Pease, and John H. Mullin to show the partition of the common lands. It shows numbered lots, major roads, a dividing line between beach land and up land, and a town boundary line between Gay Head and Chilmark. The last names of land owners shown on the map include Cuff, Peters, Cooper, Manning, Johnson, Rodman, Mingo, Tobey, Vanderhoop, Sanderhook, Map of Gay Head Showing the Genochio, Eagleston, Randolph, Attaquin, Madison, Belain, Smalley, Aquinnah / Gay Head 1870 1976.023 Rolled Maps Partition of the Common Lands Williams, Duff, Powell, James, Nevers, Devine, Cook, Jeffers, Weeks, Dodge, Richardson, Bound, Bassett, Allen, Haskins, Mayhew, Merrill, Norton, Spencer, Anthony, Foster, Williams, Cooper, Look, James, Laley, Hammond, Cromwell, Gersham, and Francis. It also identifies a lighthouse, church, grave yard, post office, school house, the Gay Head cliffs, Zachery's Cliffs, and the locations of ponds, a brook, and a stone wall. The map is a blueprint of a 1931 tracing of the original 1870 map. Map of Lobsterville Road in Aquinnah that gives the names and locations of property owners. The last names include Porter, Saunders, Merrill, Flat Files Cabinet 2 Aquinnah / Gay Head Lobsterville Road land divisions 1938 Manning, Draper, Jeffers, Mayhew, and Smalley. It also shows a proposed 2012.030.001 Drawer 3 road that branches off of Lobsterville Road near the Vineyard Sound.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Energy Production Potential from Tidal Streams in the United States
    Assessment of Energy Production Potential from Tidal Streams in the United States Final Project Report June 29, 2011 Georgia Tech Research Corporation Award Number: DE-FG36-08GO18174 Project Title: Assessment of Energy Production Potential from Tidal Streams in the United States Recipient: Georgia Tech Research Corporation Award Number: DE-FG36-08GO18174 Working Partners: PI: Dr. Kevin A. Haas - Georgia Tech Savannah, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, [email protected] Co-PI: Dr. Hermann M. Fritz - Georgia Tech Savannah, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, [email protected] Co-PI: Dr. Steven P. French – Georgia Tech Atlanta, Center for Geographic Information Systems, [email protected] Co-PI: Dr. Brennan T. Smith – Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Environmental Sciences Division, [email protected] Co-PI: Dr. Vincent Neary – Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Environmental Sciences Division, [email protected] Acknowledgments: Georgia Tech’s contributions to this report were funded by the Wind & Water Power Program, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE- FG36-08GO18174. The authors are solely responsible for any omissions or errors contained herein. This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • Salisbury Beach State Reservation Barrier Beach Management Plan
    SALISBURY BEACH STATE RESERVATION BARRIER BEACH MANAGEMENT PLAN EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION & RECREATION September 2008 i SALIBURY BEACH STATE RESERVATION BARRIER BEACH MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE I. PURPOSE OF THE PLAN 1 II. BACKGROUND 3 A. General 3 B. History of Salisbury Beach 3 C. Description of Salisbury Beach State Reservation 5 1. Recreational Opportunities 2. Natural Resources D. Improvements at Salisbury Beach Reservation 8 1. Recreational Improvements 2. Natural Resources E. Department of Conservation and Recreation 9 F. Geological History and Processes 10 III. ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS 12 A. MA Wetlands Protection Act (MGL c. 131 s.40) 12 B. Additional Regulations 12 1. State 2. Federal IV. BEACH MANAGEMENT AREAS 14 A. Beach Management Area 1 – Reservation 14 B. Beach Management Area 2 – Residential 14 C. Beach Management Area 3 – Beach Center 16 V. PUBLIC USE, ACCESS AND SAFETY 17 A. Public Use 17 1. Facilities 2. Beach and Dune Areas 3. Public Use Beach Permits B. Public Access 19 1. General 2. Pedestrian Access 3. Maintenance of Public Access Ways 4. Vehicular Access 5. Beach Access Authorization C. Public Safety 27 1. Lifeguards ii 2. Emergency Response 3. Beach Patrols 4. Bathing Beach Water Quality D. Public Access Ways and Facility Management Recommendations 31 VI. RESOURCE AREA MANAGEMENT AND PROTECTION 36 A. General Description 36 B. Barrier Beach (310 CMR 10.29) 36 1. Definition 2. Functions 3. Critical Characteristics 4. Performance Standards C. Coastal Beach (310 CMR 10.27) 37 1. Definition 2. Functions 3. Critical Characteristics 4. Performance Standards 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Energy Production Potential from Tidal Streams in the United States
    Assessment of Energy Production Potential from Tidal Streams in the United States Final Project Report June 29, 2011 Georgia Tech Research Corporation Award Number: DE-FG36-08GO18174 Project Title: Assessment of Energy Production Potential from Tidal Streams in the United States Recipient: Georgia Tech Research Corporation Award Number: DE-FG36-08GO18174 Working Partners: PI: Dr. Kevin A. Haas - Georgia Tech Savannah, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, [email protected] Co-PI: Dr. Hermann M. Fritz - Georgia Tech Savannah, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, [email protected] Co-PI: Dr. Steven P. French – Georgia Tech Atlanta, Center for Geographic Information Systems, [email protected] Co-PI: Dr. Brennan T. Smith – Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Environmental Sciences Division, [email protected] Co-PI: Dr. Vincent Neary – Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Environmental Sciences Division, [email protected] Acknowledgments: Georgia Tech’s contributions to this report were funded by the Wind & Water Power Program, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE- FG36-08GO18174. The authors are solely responsible for any omissions or errors contained herein. This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • Finding of Adverse Effect for the Vineyard Wind Project Construction and Operations Plan
    Finding of Adverse Effect for the Vineyard Wind Project Construction and Operations Plan Revised June 20, 2019 The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) has made a Finding of Adverse Effect (Finding) for the Vineyard Wind Construction and Operations Plan (COP) on the Gay Head Lighthouse, the Nantucket Island National Historic Landmark (Nantucket NHL), and submerged paleolandforms as contributing elements to the Nantucket Sound Traditional Cultural Property (Nantucket Sound TCP), pursuant to 36 CFR 800.5. Resolution of all adverse effects to historic properties will be codified in a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA), pursuant to 36 CFR 800.6(c). 1 Description of the Undertaking On December 19, 2017, BOEM received a COP from Vineyard Wind, LLC (Vineyard Wind) proposing development of an 800-megawatt (MW) offshore wind energy project within Lease OCS-A 0501 offshore Massachusetts. If approved by BOEM, Vineyard Wind would be allowed to construct and operate wind turbine generators (WTGs), an export cable to shore, and associated facilities for a specified term. BOEM is now conducting its environmental and technical reviews of the COP and has published a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) for its decision regarding approval of the plan. The Draft EIS and information on the Vineyard Wind Project, including the COP are available at https://www.boem.gov/Vineyard-Wind/. The EIS considers reasonably foreseeable effects of the proposal, including impacts to historic resources. BOEM has determined that approval, approval with modification, or disapproval of the Vineyard Wind COP constitutes an undertaking subject to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA; 54 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]