The Nucleolus As a Multiphase Liquid Condensate

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Nucleolus As a Multiphase Liquid Condensate REVIEWS The nucleolus as a multiphase liquid condensate Denis L. J. Lafontaine 1 ✉ , Joshua A. Riback 2, Rümeyza Bascetin 1 and Clifford P. Brangwynne 2,3 ✉ Abstract | The nucleolus is the most prominent nuclear body and serves a fundamentally important biological role as a site of ribonucleoprotein particle assembly, primarily dedicated to ribosome biogenesis. Despite being one of the first intracellular structures visualized historically, the biophysical rules governing its assembly and function are only starting to become clear. Recent studies have provided increasing support for the concept that the nucleolus represents a multilayered biomolecular condensate, whose formation by liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) facilitates the initial steps of ribosome biogenesis and other functions. Here, we review these biophysical insights in the context of the molecular and cell biology of the nucleolus. We discuss how nucleolar function is linked to its organization as a multiphase condensate and how dysregulation of this organization could provide insights into still poorly understood aspects of nucleolus-associated diseases, including cancer, ribosomopathies and neurodegeneration as well as ageing. We suggest that the LLPS model provides the starting point for a unifying quantitative framework for the assembly, structural maintenance and function of the nucleolus, with implications for gene regulation and ribonucleoprotein particle assembly throughout the nucleus. The LLPS concept is also likely useful in designing new therapeutic strategies to target nucleolar dysfunction. Protein trans-acting factors Among numerous microscopically visible nuclear sub- at the inner core where rRNA transcription occurs and Proteins important for structures, the nucleolus is the most prominent and proceeding towards the periphery (Fig. 1). ribosomal subunit biogenesis represents a functionally and biophysically distinct body In addition to the ribosome, other ribonucleoprotein that interact only transiently or compartment. The nucleolus is, in fact, so promi- particles are assembled, at least in part, in the nucleolus2. with maturing ribosomal subunits; they are not found nent that it drew the attention of early biologists over This is notably the case for the signal recognition par- on mature ribosomes. 200 years ago, in light microscopy studies by Fontana, ticle, involved in protein secretion and targeting to the Valentin and Wagner1. Following these early descriptions endoplasmic reticulum of transmembrane proteins, and 1 came the understanding of the functional importance for telomerase, required for the maintenance of chromo- RNA Molecular Biology, 4 Fonds de la Recherche of the nucleolus, including its primary role as the site for some ends . There have also been reports of precur- Scientifique (F.R.S./FNRS), the initial steps of ribosome biogenesis, including RNA sors of tRNAs, and even of mRNAs, transiting through Université Libre de Bruxelles polymerase I (Pol I)-driven transcription, processing and the nucleolus1. Although it is not entirely clear why Cancer Research Center modification of ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and the assem- non-rRNAs transit through the nucleolus during their life (ULB-CRC), Center for bly of rRNA-containing complexes2 (FIG. 1). These pro- cycle, it is largely assumed that they do so to benefit from Microscopy and Molecular Imaging (CMMI), Gosselies, cesses involve several hundred protein trans-acting factors the abundant assembly and modification machineries Belgium. and small nucleolar RNAs3, which serve to guide the speci- present there. 2Department of Chemical ficity of rRNA chemical modifications, pre-rRNA folding The nucleolus is physically separated from the and Biological Engineering, and cleavage. Once precursor subunits are released from rest of the nuclear space, yet is accessible for dynamic Princeton University, the nucleolar structure, they undergo further maturation exchange due to the absence of a delimiting membrane. Princeton, NJ, USA. in the nucleoplasm and cytoplasm prior to becoming Hence, it is an ideal locale for fine regulation of cell home- 3 HHMI, Princeton University, fully functional ribosomal subunits, ready to engage in ostasis, for example, through the transient sequestration Princeton, NJ, USA. translating mRNA into protein. This nucleolar function of key regulators of the cell cycle5. The nucleolus also ✉e-mail: denis.lafontaine@ ulb.ac.be; cbrangwy@ is accompanied by organization of the nucleolus into plays important roles in sensing diverse stresses, includ- princeton.edu distinct subcompartments. In mammalian cells, nucleoli ing genotoxic and oxidative stress, heat shock, nutrient 6 https://doi.org/10.1038/ display three layers, nested like Russian dolls, where suc- deprivation, oncogene activation and viral infection . s41580-020-0272-6 cessive steps of ribosome production take place, starting Although these diverse nucleolar functions have been NATURE REVIEWS | MOLECULAR CELL BIOLOGY REVIEWS Nucleolar interstice a b Nucleolar functions in ribosome biogenesis FC Nuclear envelope DFC rRNA synthesis rDNA RNA Pol I Paraspeckle Nuclear pore Nascent pre-rRNA FBL complex 5′ ETS P granule Gem GC Phase separation and DFC phase GAR (IDRs) RBD establishment Cajal α-Helix Processing body 1 rRNA sorting body FC into DFC phase DFC ITS1 ITS2 Nuclear 5′ ETS 3′ ETS spleckles Stress 18S 5.8S 28S granule PC rRNA processing Nucleolus: rRNA modification FC DFC GC PC c FC (RPA194) DFC (FBL) GC (PES1) Overlay rRNP assembly GC uL18 2 uL5 2.5 m rRNP transport Central μ protuberance assembly Pre-40S 5S rRNA (small subunit) Mathematical modelling d SIM of FC–DFC core of FBL 'beads' Central protuberance FBL rRNP surveillance Pre-60S DFC (large subunit) 20 nm DFC (FBL) PC FC (Pol I) Fig. 1 | Nucleolar organization and its role in ribosome biogenesis. central protuberance assembly by depletion of uL5, uL18 or factors a | Schematic of a eukaryotic cell with representative cytoplasmic and important for their assembly severely disrupts the nucleolar phase nuclear condensates important for gene expression regulation. (see FIg. 6a). Interestingly, depletion of the vast majority of the other The nucleolus is represented with its three subcompartments: the fibrillar 78 ribosomal proteins, in particular those belonging to the small ribosomal centre (FC), the dense fibrillar component (DFC) and the granular subunit, has no, or little, effect on nucleolar phase behaviour. c | The three component (GC). b | Coordination of the nucleolar substructure with its subnucleolar compartments detected by immunofluorescence in roles in ribosome biogenesis. The main functions of the nucleolus in confocal microscopy: the FC detected with RNA polymerase I (Pol I) ribosome biogenesis are indicated in boxes. In cells, these steps are subunit RPA194, the DFC with FBL and the GC with the protein Pescadillo largely concomitant. The importance of the liquid–liquid phase ribosomal biogenesis factor 1 (PES1). d | Each human nucleolus consists separation model in understanding the connections between nucleolar of several dozen FC–DFC modules. Interestingly, the number of these functions and phase behaviour is illustrated with two examples: modules is relatively constant within a particular cell type but varies nascent pre-ribosomal rRNA (pre-rRNA) sorting (step 1)23 and central considerably between cell types, making it a powerful biomarker for protuberance assembly (step 2)81. (1) As nascent transcripts emerge from cell classification. Each FC–DFC module contains two or three the FC–DFC interface where they are synthesized, they are bound by the transcriptionally active ribosomal DNAs (rDNAs) at the FC–DFC interface RNA binding domain (RBD) of fibrillarin (FBL). FBL self-associates through where Pol I complexes are enriched and where transcription occurs its Gly–Arg-rich domain (GAR domain), which consists of intrinsically (left panel; image of FC–DFC interface in a HeLa cell obtained with disordered regions (IDRs). This promotes establishment of the DFC phase, structured illumination microscopy (SIM)). Ribosome assembly factors, sorting of the nascent transcript from the FC–DFC interface to the DFC such as FBL (present at roughly 3,600 copies per FC–DFC unit), form a and initial pre-rRNA processing. Note that whereas the RBD of FBL is spherical network of 18–24 regularly spaced ‘beads’ ~130 nm in diameter located in its methyltransferase domain, this methylation function is not that assemble into the DFC around the FC (right panel; 3D in silico model required either for rRNA sorting or for processing. (2) A complex of the clustered FBL distribution in the DFC). ETS, external transcribed consisting of the ribosomal proteins uL5 and uL18 and the 5S rRNA spacer; ITS, internal transcribed spacer; PC, perinucleolar chromatin; (produced in the nucleoplasm by RNA polymerase III, not shown) is rRNP, ribosomal ribonucleoprotein. Images in part c are unpublished and assembled late on the maturing pre-60S subunits to form the central a courtesy of D.L.J.L. and R.B. Part d adapted with permission from protuberance, a structure essential for ribosome function. Inhibition of REF. 23, Elsevier. www.nature.com/nrm REVIEWS Small nucleolar RNAs largely perceived as uncoupled from biophysical mod- yet coherent shape — are reconciled by the LLPS model, Antisense small RNAs involved els of nucleolar assembly, they are increasingly being which provides a predictive biophysical framework in RNA modification, pre-rRNA revisited through the lens of nucleolar
Recommended publications
  • Chloroplast Transit Peptides: Structure, Function and Evolution
    reviews Chloroplast transit Although the first demonstration of precursor trans- port into chloroplasts was shown over two decades peptides: structure, ago3,4, only now is this area of cell biology becom- ing well understood. Many excellent reviews have been published recently on the evolution of plas- function and tids5, the evolution of organelle genomes6, the mechanism of gene transfer from organelles to the nucleus7 and the mechanism of protein import into evolution chloroplasts8,9. Proteins destined to plastids and other organ- elles share in common the requirement for ‘new’ Barry D. Bruce sequence information to facilitate their correct trafficking within the cell. Although in most cases this information resides in a cleavable, N-terminal sequence often collectively referred to as signal It is thought that two to three thousand different proteins are sequence, the different organelle-targeting se- targeted to the chloroplast, and the ‘transit peptides’ that act as quences have distinct properties and names: ‘signal peptides’ for the endoplasmic reticulum, chloroplast targeting sequences are probably the largest class of ‘presequences’ for the mitochondria and ‘transit peptides’ for chloroplasts and other plastids. This targeting sequences in plants. At a primary structural level, transit review focuses on recent progress in dissecting peptide sequences are highly divergent in length, composition and the role of the stromal-targeting domain of chloro- plast transit peptides. I will consider briefly the organization. An emerging concept suggests that transit peptides multitude of distinct functions that transit peptides contain multiple domains that provide either distinct or overlapping perform, provide an update on the limited struc- tural information of a number of transit peptides functions.
    [Show full text]
  • Novel Nesprin-1 Mutations Associated with Dilated
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of East Anglia digital repository Human Molecular Genetics, 2017, Vol. 0, No. 0 1–19 doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddx116 Advance Access Publication Date: 7 April 2017 Original Article ORIGINAL ARTICLE Novel nesprin-1 mutations associated with dilated cardiomyopathy cause nuclear envelope disruption and defects in myogenesis Can Zhou1,2,†, Chen Li1,2,†, Bin Zhou3,4, Huaqin Sun4,5, Victoria Koullourou1,6, Ian Holt7, Megan J. Puckelwartz8, Derek T. Warren1, Robert Hayward1, Ziyuan Lin4,5, Lin Zhang3,4, Glenn E. Morris7, Elizabeth M. McNally8, Sue Shackleton6, Li Rao2, Catherine M. Shanahan1,‡ and Qiuping Zhang1,*,‡ 1King’s College London British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence, Cardiovascular Division, London SE5 9NU, UK, 2Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China, 3Laboratory of Molecular Translational Medicine, 4Key Laboratory of Obstetric & Gynecologic and Pediatric Diseases and Birth Defects of Ministry of Education, 5SCU-CUHK Joint Laboratory for Reproductive Medicine, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China, 6Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 9HN, UK, 7Wolfson Centre for Inherited Neuromuscular Disease, RJAH Orthopaedic Hospital, Oswestry SY10 7AG, UK and Institute for Science and Technology in Medicine, Keele University, ST5 5BG, UK and 8Center for Genetic Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg
    [Show full text]
  • Centrosome-Nuclear Envelope Tethering and Microtubule Motor
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/442368; this version posted October 12, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Centrosome-nuclear envelope tethering and microtubule motor-based pulling forces collaborate in centrosome positioning during mitotic entry Vincent Boudreau1, Richard Chen1, Alan Edwards1, Muhammad Sulaimain1, Paul S. Maddox1* 1 Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill * Direct all correspondence to this author at [email protected]. Centrosome positioning relative to the nucleus and cell nuclear envelope and at the cortex to ensure proper centrosome shape is highly regulated across cell types, during cell migration positioning (De Simone et al., 2016). Dynein regulators including and during spindle formation in cell division. Across most sexual- LIS-1 are also required for centrosome separation in the embryo ly reproducing animals, centrosomes are provided to the oocyte (Cockell et al., 2004), although their spatio-temporal contributions through fertilization and must be positioned properly to establish remain elusive. Despite our understanding of microtubule cyto- the zygotic mitotic spindle. How centrosomes are positioned in skeleton-based pulling forces, the contribution of key mitotic kinas- space and time through the concerted action of key mitotic en- es and phosphatases to centrosome positioning remains unclear. try biochemical regulators including Protein Phosphatase 2A The net effect of molecular regulators is a biophysical (PP2A-B55/SUR-6), biophysical regulators including Dynein mechanism required for positioning centrosomes during mitotic and the nuclear lamina is unclear.
    [Show full text]
  • Parameters of Starch Granule Genesis in Chloroplasts of Arabidopsis Thaliana
    Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät Irina Malinova | Hadeel M. Qasim | Henrike Brust | Joerg Fettke Parameters of Starch Granule Genesis in Chloroplasts of Arabidopsis thaliana Suggested citation referring to the original publication: Frontiers in Plant Science 9 (2018) Art, 761 DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00761 ISSN (online) 1664-462X Postprint archived at the Institutional Repository of the Potsdam University in: Postprints der Universität Potsdam Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe ; 478 ISSN 1866-8372 http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-419295 fpls-09-00761 June 3, 2018 Time: 11:48 # 1 MINI REVIEW published: 05 June 2018 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00761 Parameters of Starch Granule Genesis in Chloroplasts of Arabidopsis thaliana Irina Malinova†, Hadeel M. Qasim, Henrike Brust† and Joerg Fettke* Biopolymer Analytics, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany Starch is the primary storage carbohydrate in most photosynthetic organisms and allows the accumulation of carbon and energy in form of an insoluble and semi-crystalline particle. In the last decades large progress, especially in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana, was made in understanding the structure and metabolism of starch and its conjunction. The process underlying the initiation of starch granules remains obscure, Edited by: although this is a fundamental process and seems to be strongly regulated, as in Yasunori Nakamura, Akita Prefectural University, Japan Arabidopsis leaves the starch granule number per chloroplast is fixed with 5-7. Several Reviewed by: single, double, and triple mutants were reported in the last years that showed massively Christophe D’Hulst, alterations in the starch granule number per chloroplast and allowed further insights in Lille University of Science and Technology, France this important process.
    [Show full text]
  • Building the Interphase Nucleus: a Study on the Kinetics of 3D Chromosome Formation, Temporal Relation to Active Transcription, and the Role of Nuclear Rnas
    University of Massachusetts Medical School eScholarship@UMMS GSBS Dissertations and Theses Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences 2020-07-28 Building the Interphase Nucleus: A study on the kinetics of 3D chromosome formation, temporal relation to active transcription, and the role of nuclear RNAs Kristin N. Abramo University of Massachusetts Medical School Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Follow this and additional works at: https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/gsbs_diss Part of the Bioinformatics Commons, Cell Biology Commons, Computational Biology Commons, Genomics Commons, Laboratory and Basic Science Research Commons, Molecular Biology Commons, Molecular Genetics Commons, and the Systems Biology Commons Repository Citation Abramo KN. (2020). Building the Interphase Nucleus: A study on the kinetics of 3D chromosome formation, temporal relation to active transcription, and the role of nuclear RNAs. GSBS Dissertations and Theses. https://doi.org/10.13028/a9gd-gw44. Retrieved from https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/ gsbs_diss/1099 Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 License This material is brought to you by eScholarship@UMMS. It has been accepted for inclusion in GSBS Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of eScholarship@UMMS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BUILDING THE INTERPHASE NUCLEUS: A STUDY ON THE KINETICS OF 3D CHROMOSOME FORMATION, TEMPORAL RELATION TO ACTIVE TRANSCRIPTION, AND THE ROLE OF NUCLEAR RNAS A Dissertation Presented By KRISTIN N. ABRAMO Submitted to the Faculty of the University of Massachusetts Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Worcester in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSPOPHY July 28, 2020 Program in Systems Biology, Interdisciplinary Graduate Program BUILDING THE INTERPHASE NUCLEUS: A STUDY ON THE KINETICS OF 3D CHROMOSOME FORMATION, TEMPORAL RELATION TO ACTIVE TRANSCRIPTION, AND THE ROLE OF NUCLEAR RNAS A Dissertation Presented By KRISTIN N.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to the Cell Cell History Cell Structures and Functions
    Introduction to the cell cell history cell structures and functions CK-12 Foundation December 16, 2009 CK-12 Foundation is a non-profit organization with a mission to reduce the cost of textbook materials for the K-12 market both in the U.S. and worldwide. Using an open-content, web-based collaborative model termed the “FlexBook,” CK-12 intends to pioneer the generation and distribution of high quality educational content that will serve both as core text as well as provide an adaptive environment for learning. Copyright ©2009 CK-12 Foundation This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/us/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA. Contents 1 Cell structure and function dec 16 5 1.1 Lesson 3.1: Introduction to Cells .................................. 5 3 www.ck12.org www.ck12.org 4 Chapter 1 Cell structure and function dec 16 1.1 Lesson 3.1: Introduction to Cells Lesson Objectives • Identify the scientists that first observed cells. • Outline the importance of microscopes in the discovery of cells. • Summarize what the cell theory proposes. • Identify the limitations on cell size. • Identify the four parts common to all cells. • Compare prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. Introduction Knowing the make up of cells and how cells work is necessary to all of the biological sciences. Learning about the similarities and differences between cell types is particularly important to the fields of cell biology and molecular biology.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Bodies Reorganize During Myogenesis in Vitro and Are
    Homma et al. Skeletal Muscle (2016) 6:42 DOI 10.1186/s13395-016-0113-7 RESEARCH Open Access Nuclear bodies reorganize during myogenesis in vitro and are differentially disrupted by expression of FSHD-associated DUX4 Sachiko Homma1, Mary Lou Beermann1, Bryant Yu1, Frederick M. Boyce2 and Jeffrey Boone Miller1,3* Abstract Background: Nuclear bodies, such as nucleoli, PML bodies, and SC35 speckles, are dynamic sub-nuclear structures that regulate multiple genetic and epigenetic processes. Additional regulation is provided by RNA/DNA handling proteins, notably TDP-43 and FUS, which have been linked to ALS pathology. Previous work showed that mouse cell line myotubes have fewer but larger nucleoli than myoblasts, and we had found that nuclear aggregation of TDP-43 in human myotubes was induced by expression of DUX4-FL, a transcription factor that is aberrantly expressed and causes pathology in facioscapulohumeral dystrophy (FSHD). However, questions remained about nuclear bodies in human myogenesis and in muscle disease. Methods: We examined nucleoli, PML bodies, SC35 speckles, TDP-43, and FUS in myoblasts and myotubes derived from healthy donors and from patients with FSHD, laminin-alpha-2-deficiency (MDC1A), and alpha-sarcoglycan- deficiency (LGMD2D). We further examined how these nuclear bodies and proteins were affected by DUX4-FL expression. Results: We found that nucleoli, PML bodies, and SC35 speckles reorganized during differentiation in vitro, with all three becoming less abundant in myotube vs. myoblast nuclei. In addition, though PML bodies did not change in size, both nucleoli and SC35 speckles were larger in myotube than myoblast nuclei. Similar patterns of nuclear body reorganization occurred in healthy control, MDC1A, and LGMD2D cultures, as well as in the large fraction of nuclei that did not show DUX4-FL expression in FSHD cultures.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Domains
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Institutional Repository CELL SCIENCE AT A GLANCE 2891 Nuclear domains dynamic structures and, in addition, nuclear pore complex has been shown to rapid protein exchange occurs between have a remarkable substructure, in which David L. Spector many of the domains and the a basket extends into the nucleoplasm. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, One Bungtown nucleoplasm (Misteli, 2001). An The peripheral nuclear lamina lies Road, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724, USA extensive effort is currently underway by inside the nuclear envelope and is (e-mail: [email protected]) numerous laboratories to determine the composed of lamins A/C and B and is biological function(s) associated with thought to play a role in regulating Journal of Cell Science 114, 2891-2893 (2001) © The Company of Biologists Ltd each domain. The accompanying poster nuclear envelope structure and presents an overview of commonly anchoring interphase chromatin at the The mammalian cell nucleus is a observed nuclear domains. nuclear periphery. Internal patches of membrane-bound organelle that contains lamin protein are also present in the the machinery essential for gene The nucleus is bounded by a nuclear nucleoplasm (Moir et al., 2000). The expression. Although early studies envelope, a double-membrane structure, cartoon depicts much of the nuclear suggested that little organization exists of which the outer membrane is envelope/peripheral lamina as within this compartment, more contiguous with the rough endoplasmic transparent, so that internal structures contemporary studies have identified an reticulum and is often studded with can be more easily observed.
    [Show full text]
  • Biogenesis of Nuclear Bodies
    Downloaded from http://cshperspectives.cshlp.org/ on September 30, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Biogenesis of Nuclear Bodies Miroslav Dundr1 and Tom Misteli2 1Department of Cell Biology, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, Ilinois 60064 2National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 Correspondence: [email protected]; [email protected] The nucleus is unique amongst cellular organelles in that it contains a myriad of discrete suborganelles. These nuclear bodies are morphologically and molecularly distinct entities, and they host specific nuclear processes. Although the mode of biogenesis appears to differ widely between individual nuclear bodies, several common design principles are emerging, particularly, the ability of nuclear bodies to form de novo, a role of RNA as a struc- tural element and self-organization as a mode of formation. The controlled biogenesis of nuclear bodies is essential for faithful maintenance of nuclear architecture during the cell cycle and is an important part of cellular responses to intra- and extracellular events. he mammalian cell nucleus contains a mul- seems to act indirectly by regulating the local Ttitude of discrete suborganelles, referred to concentration of its components in the nucleo- as nuclear bodies or nuclear compartments plasm. (reviewed in Dundr and Misteli 2001; Spector In many ways, nuclear bodies are similar 2001; Lamond and Spector 2003; Handwerger to conventional cellular organelles in the cy- and Gall 2006; Zhao et al. 2009). These bodies toplasm. Like cytoplasmic organelles, they con- are an essential part of the nuclear landscape tain a specific set of resident proteins, which as they compartmentalize the nuclear space defines each structure molecularly.
    [Show full text]
  • Module IV Nucleus
    Module IV Nucleus Structure and functions of interphase nucleus, Nuclear membrane, pore complex, structure and functions of nucleolus Chromosomes – Structure; Heterochromatin, Euchromatin, Nucleosomes, Nucleus is the most important part of the cell situated in the cytoplasm. All the cellular activities are controlled by it. Nucleus is a directing and organizing unit without which the cell could not exist. It was discovered by Robert Brown (1831) in flowering plants and is now recognized as the structure that contains the hereditary material of the cell. The study of nucleus or karyosome constitutes karyology. The location of nucleus varies in the cell depending upon the species. Usually it is situated in the centre of the cell surrounded on all sides by cytoplasm. In green algae, Acetabularia, it shows various positions, though mainly present in the basal part of cell. Generally the nuclei are scattered in the cytoplasm. Morphology: 1. Shape: The shape of nucleus is variable according to cell type. It is generally spheroid but ellipsoid or flattened nuclei may also occur in certain cells. The nuclear margins are generally smooth but they may be lobulated bearing small infoldings of nuclear membrane as in leucocytes. In certain white blood corpuscles the nucleus is dumbbell-shaped and exhibits variation during life history stages. In human neutrophil, it is trilobed. 2. Number: Mostly cell contains a single nucleus, known as mononucleate cell. Cells containing two nuclei are known as binucleate cells (e.g., Paramecium), and cells of cartilage and liver. Sometimes more than two nuclei (3 to 100 nuclei) are present in a single cell.
    [Show full text]
  • The Splicing Factor XAB2 Interacts with ERCC1-XPF and XPG for RNA-Loop Processing During Mammalian Development
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.20.211441; this version posted July 21, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. The Splicing Factor XAB2 interacts with ERCC1-XPF and XPG for RNA-loop processing during mammalian development Evi Goulielmaki1*, Maria Tsekrekou1,2*, Nikos Batsiotos1,2, Mariana Ascensão-Ferreira3, Eleftheria Ledaki1, Kalliopi Stratigi1, Georgia Chatzinikolaou1, Pantelis Topalis1, Theodore Kosteas1, Janine Altmüller4, Jeroen A. Demmers5, Nuno L. Barbosa-Morais3, George A. Garinis1,2* 1. Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Foundation for Research and Technology- Hellas, GR70013, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, 2. Department of Biology, University of Crete, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, 3. Instituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida Professor Egas Moniz, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal, 4. Cologne Center for Genomics (CCG), Institute for Genetics, University of Cologne, 50931, Cologne, Germany, 5. Proteomics Center, Netherlands Proteomics Center, and Department of Biochemistry, Erasmus University Medical Center, the Netherlands. Corresponding author: George A. Garinis ([email protected]) *: equally contributing authors bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.20.211441; this version posted July 21, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Abstract RNA splicing, transcription and the DNA damage response are intriguingly linked in mammals but the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. Using an in vivo biotinylation tagging approach in mice, we show that the splicing factor XAB2 interacts with the core spliceosome and that it binds to spliceosomal U4 and U6 snRNAs and pre-mRNAs in developing livers.
    [Show full text]
  • Liquid Network Connectivity Regulates the Stability and Composition Of
    Liquid network connectivity regulates the stability and composition of biomolecular condensates with many components Jorge R. Espinosaa,b,c, Jerelle A. Josepha,b,c , Ignacio Sanchez-Burgosa,b,c , Adiran Garaizara,b,c , Daan Frenkelb , and Rosana Collepardo-Guevaraa,b,c,1 aMaxwell Centre, Cavendish Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0HE, United Kindgdom; bDepartment of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1EW, United Kingdom; and cDepartment of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EH, United Kingdom Edited by Ken A. Dill, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, and approved April 17, 2020 (received for review October 8, 2019) One of the key mechanisms used by cells to control the spatiotem- 10), cellular bodies (11), or otherwise (8)—are ubiquitous within poral organization of their many components is the formation and the cell interior. Biomolecular condensates account for numer- dissolution of biomolecular condensates through liquid–liquid ous highly diverse domains, both inside the cytoplasm [e.g., P phase separation (LLPS). Using a minimal coarse-grained model granules (12) and RNA granules/bodies (13–15)] and in the cell that allows us to simulate thousands of interacting multivalent nucleus [e.g., Cajal bodies (16), nucleoli (17), heterochromatin proteins, we investigate the physical parameters dictating the domains (18, 19), the transport channels in the nuclear pore stability and composition of multicomponent biomolecular con- complex (20), and possibly superenhancers
    [Show full text]