Formal Discussion Of: Somatic Mutations and Carcinogenesis'
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Formal Discussion of: Somatic Mutations and Carcinogenesis' HOWARD J. CURTIS Biology Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York SUMMARY A great deal of evidence is now available indicating that mutations play a dominant role in the aging process. Because carcinogenesis is one facet of the aging process, mu tations must play a major role here also. However, carcinogenesis certainly does not consist of the simple induction of a mutation in one cell which confers the property of uncontrolled growth on that cell and its progeny. There must be some general condi tions, as well as a specific event, before carcinogenesis can take place. It is postulated that mutations in one form or another are responsible for both conditions. The mutation theory of carcinogenesis is old and well of the 1st generation (3). We then scored chromosome known to all workers in the field. It is an extremely aberrations in liver cells of mice by inducing cell division attractive theory, and there are many pieces of evidence by partial hepatectomy and examining anaphase figures which argue in its favor. Radiation, which is a very po (14). (Fig. 1). The percentage of cells containing aberra tent mutagenic agent, is also a very effective carcinogen. tions is taken as an index of the mutations present in these Most, if not all, of the chemical carcinogens are also muta cells. gens. The virus theory of carcinogenesis is well estab With the use of this technic a number of different situa lished in certain special cases, and in a very real sense it is tions have been investigated. First it was found that a facet of mutation theory. aberrations increase steadily with age (Chart 1). Next, On the other hand, there are many puzzling phenomena following a dose of X-radiation, there are a large increase which cause one to doubt this theory. For example, if in aberrations and a very slow return to normal (Chart 1). the theory is true, why does it take as long as 40 years It is known that chronic X- or ‘y-radiationis only about after a person receives a dose of radiation for a tumor to 25 % as effective in shortening the life-span as an acute appear? If a mutation to carcinogenicity is produced, dose of the same total size. It is found that the same is one would expect it to manifest itself very soon thereafter. true for the production of chromosome aberrations (Chart There is also the question of whether mutations, especially 2). It is also known that for neutron irradiation, chronic spontaneous mutations, can be produced in somatic cells. irradiation is just as effective in shortening the life-span A number of years ago it was noted that the life expec as acute irradiation. The same has been found for the tancies of animals exposed to ionizing radiation are short production of chromosome aberrations (8) (Chart 3). ened in proportion to the radiation dose received. It It is well known that some inbred strains of mice are appears that the animals die from the same diseases and quite short-lived and some quite long-lived. It was in about the same proportion as normal animals, but they found that chromosome aberrations increase quite rapidly contract the diseases sooner. In investigating this phe in one short-lived strain and quite slowly in a long-lived nomenon, it seemed that a very likely explanation would strain (4) (Chart 4). be that the radiation induced mutations in the somatic Thus in every situation tried so far there is a direct cells which caused a lack of efficiency and, thus, deteriora correlation between the degree of life shortening and the tion in organs whose cells are not capable of cell division development of somatic mutations. It should be kept in and cancer in organs whose cells regularly undergo mitosis. mind that irradiated animals die, to a very considerable In order to test this idea, it was necessary to develop a extent, from cancer, so that one can equally well say that method for estimating mutations in somatic cells. For this we made an analogy with plants, where, because factors which cause increased somatic mutations also quan somatic cells differentiate to form germ cells, chromosome titatively increase cancer production. aberrations in somatic cells can be related to true muta One of the problems raised by this work is the long de tions scored in the next generation. It was found that lay between cause and effect. Thus a dose of radiation the mutations scored in the 2nd generation are propor given to a young adult mouse may produce serious chro tional to chromosome aberrations scored in somatic cells mosomal damage in almost every cell in the body; yet the mouse appears unaffected and may not show signs of 1 The research reported in this paper was carried out at Brook havenNational Laboratoryunder the auspices ofthe U. S. Atomic aging until many months later. At first glance, this situa Energy Commission. tion seems to contradict the theory, but in the light of 1305 Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on October 3, 2021. © 1965 American Association for Cancer Research. 1306 Cancer Research Vol. 25, September 1965 I I @I I 70 - 0 92 rods NEUTRONS -SINGLE DOSE *31 rods NEUTRONS PER WEEK @ 0 X-RAY 100 - @260 - £ CONTROL I- :i 700r 4 50 - 0 2 40 - @ 30- @4O- ,,-‘ - @ - ., 20 - 10 - @ 2@ £T@TTIITTT DAYSFROMSTARTOF EXPERIMENT 8 9 0 IF 2 CHART 3.—Chromosome aberrations in liver cells of (a) mice AGE - MONTHS subjected to chronic neutron irradiation, (b) mice subjected to CHART 1.—Chromosome aberrations in liver cells as a function acute neutron irradiation, and (c) control mice. The dashed line of age in normal mice and in mice that had received a large dose of gives the rate of build-up of aberrations in Group a mice which X-rays. The curves show the steady increase in the number of would be expected if chronic irradiation were as effective in pro chromosome aberrations (mutations) with natural aging and the ducing aberrations as acute is, and it will be seen that the experi dramatic increase and slow return to normal following X-rays mental points fall closely on this line. The data show that there is no chromosomal healing following even small doses of neutrons [from Stevenson and Curtis (14)]. [from Curtis et at. (8)1. IIIIII •STRAIN A/HEJ 100 - 0STRAIN C57BL/6J U) 100 z (I)z YOUNG MICE 0 0 ————OLDBREEDERS I- 80 - ,fr—-—.---@ @ 80 w w , 60 - , @ 60 Ui 0 U) 0 40 - -@ —. ._o— —-0@ 0 U) 0 0 40 o—___o_•@__ 1' I 0 C) I 20 - C) 20 a! <@T@7TI I _0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 AGE - DAYS 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 CHART4.—Chromosome aberrations in liver cells of normal mice AGE - DAYS of 2 different inbred strains as a function of age. The median life CHART 2.—Chromosome aberrations in liver cells of (a) mice span of each strain is indicated by the arrows. In each case the solid lines represent animals 8 weeks of age at the start of the ex subjected to chronic 7-irradiation, (b) mice given a single dose of periment, and the broken lines, old breeding animals about 1 year X-rays, (c) normal mice. The dashed line shows the rate of old at the start of the experiment [from Crowley and Curtis (4)]. build-up which would be expected for mice of Group a if chronic irradiation were as effective in producing chromosome aberrations (DNA)1 —ø'(RNA)1-—e@(Protein)1 as acute irradiation is. Since the experimental curve has a much smaller slope, it is concluded that chromosome healing takes place following small doses of radiation [from Curtis and Crowley (7)]. (DNA)2 —@(RNA)2 —@(Protein)2 modern theory of the role of the nucleus in cell function, (DNA)3 —@(RNA)3 —.@(Protein)3 it may actually strengthen it. A schematic representation of the control of cellular I I I @ function is given in Chart 5. It is believed that there is I I 1 DNA2 molecule of each species, 10—100RNA molecules (DNA)@—.@(RNA)@---.'@ (Protein)@ of each, and more than 1000 protein molecules of each. CHART5.—Schematic representation of the control of cell func Thus if a mutation occurs which destroys a single DNA tion. The chromosomes contain the different individual DNA molecule, the cell can still function for a long time on molecules, each of which synthesizes the corresponding RNA molecules, which in turn synthesize the corresponding proteins. 2 The abbreviations used are: DNA, deoxyribonucleic acid; A mutation can be considered as the elimination of 1 or more DNA RNA, ribonucleic acid. molecules, which eventually eliminates that molecular line. Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on October 3, 2021. © 1965 American Association for Cancer Research. CURTIS—Formal Discuss-ion of Somatic Mutations and Carcinogenesis 1307 (I) z 0 I- L.J 4 0 U) 0 0 I C) a! DAYS FROM START OF EXPERIMENT CHART6.—Chromosome aberrations in liver cells of both irradiated and control mice, and with and without carbon tetrachloride injections every 45 days (arrows) , which destroyed about half the liver. The standard error of each point is indicated. This induced mitosis caused a relatively slow return to control levels [from Curtis et al. (9)]. stored RNA and proteins. Indeed this seems to be the plant cells, and it now seems even more potent for animal case, and one can cite a number of instances in which cells.