Unit Origami: Star-Building on Deltahedra Heidi Burgiel Bridgewater State University, [email protected]

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Unit Origami: Star-Building on Deltahedra Heidi Burgiel Bridgewater State University, Hburgiel@Bridgew.Edu Bridgewater State University Virtual Commons - Bridgewater State University Mathematics Faculty Publications Mathematics Department 2015 Unit Origami: Star-Building on Deltahedra Heidi Burgiel Bridgewater State University, [email protected] Virtual Commons Citation Burgiel, Heidi (2015). Unit Origami: Star-Building on Deltahedra. In Mathematics Faculty Publications. Paper 47. Available at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/math_fac/47 This item is available as part of Virtual Commons, the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts. Proceedings of Bridges 2015: Mathematics, Music, Art, Architecture, Culture Unit Origami: Star-Building on Deltahedra Heidi Burgiel Dept. of Mathematics, Bridgewater State University 24 Park Avenue, Bridgewater, MA 02325, USA [email protected] Abstract This workshop provides instructions for folding the star-building unit – a modification of the Sonobe module for unit origami. Geometric questions naturally arise during this process, ranging in difficulty from middle school to graduate levels. Participants will learn to fold and assemble star-building units, then explore the structure of the eight strictly convex deltahedra. Introduction Many authors and educators have used origami, the art of paper folding, to provide concrete examples moti- vating mathematical problem solving. [3, 2] In unit origami, multiple sheets are folded and combined to form a whole; the Sonobe unit is a classic module in this art form. This workshop describes the construction and assembly of the star-building unit1, highlights a small selection of the many geometric questions motivated by this process, and introduces participants to the strictly convex deltahedra. Proficiency in geometry and origami is not required to enjoy this event. About the Unit Three Sonobe units interlock to form a pyramid with an equilateral triangular base as shown in Figure 1. Erecting these pyramids over the faces of structures built from equilateral triangles yields attractive models and provides insight into the composition of such structures [3]. By folding from 6 to 30 star-building units, participants may augment each of the strictly convex deltahedra [1] in turn. Figure 1 : Three star-building units interlock to cover an equilateral triangular face. 1Franco’s star-building unit is structurally equivalent to the Sonobe unit first published in 1968. [5] 585 Burgiel Folding the Unit To fold the unit, start with a regular 5 inch square of origami paper.2 Place it colored side down in front of you, and fold it in half vertically. Then fold the right side in to meet the fold you just made. 1 Exercise: The distance from the left side of the paper to the first fold is 2 the width of the paper. The 1 1 distance from the left side to the second fold is 2 + 4 paper widths. Imagine opening the right side out again, 1 1 1 then folding it in to create a fold 2 + 4 + 8 paper widths from the left side. A perfect folder with ideal paper 1 1 1 1 could fold forever to get a distance of 2 + 4 + 8 + 16 + ··· paper widths. What would that look like? Figure 2 : Fold vertically, then fold the right side in. Fold the left side in to the center, then lay the paper out flat again. You will use the creases just formed as guides for your next four folds. Fold the upper left corner along the dotted line shown in Figure 3 and crease, so that the top of the paper aligns with the leftmost fold. Then fold the crease you just made down to the leftmost vertical fold. Repeat on the lower right; do not unfold. This folding pattern should be familiar from paper airplane construction. Figure 3 : Paper airplane folds take upper left and lower right corners to the guide creases. Exercise: What are the angles of the shaded triangle on the left side of Figure 3? Side lengths? Area? What about the shaded triangle on the right? Fold the left and right sides in again to form a rectangle, then fold the top right quarter of the rectangle down to its midline and the lower left quarter up. Exercise: Can you prove that the figure on the left side of Figure 4 must be a rectangle? That the figure on the right will fold into a parallelogram? 2Experienced folders may prefer to use a three inch square for sturdier results, and smaller squares may be used in jewelry making. 586 Unit Origami: Star-Building on Deltahedra Figure 4 : Fold into a rectangle, then a parallelogram. As shown on the left in Figure 5, take the corners you just folded down and gently tuck them under the paper airplane folds. This creates reinforced points at the upper left and lower right corners of your unit which will be inserted into pockets formed by the paper airplane folds. Figure 5 : Gently tuck corners under paper airplane folds to form pockets and reinforced flaps. Flip your unit upside-down; you should see a plain parallelogram with a faint diagonal crease, as shown on the left in Figure 6. Fold the corners of the parallelogram in to make a square. This square will form one face of your cube. Fold six more units, then assemble them into a cube by inserting reinforced points into central pockets as shown on the right in Figure 5. Exercise: How are the dimensions of the unit origami cube related to the dimensions of the paper you started with? What size paper would you need to start with to create a cube whose sides have length one centimeter? Whose sides have length one foot? Figure 6 : Flip, then fold corners in. Exercise: Look closely at this cube; in particular, notice the pattern of folds and overlaps on each face. What symmetries does the cube have? What symmetries of the cube preserve the colors of the units that make up the cube—i.e., send each colored unit to one of the same color? How many different symmetry groups can you represent using different colored units? (See Franco [3] for some solutions to this exercise.) 587 Burgiel Augmented Convex Deltahedra... Figure 1 shows three star-building units combined to cover an equilateral triangle; the cube you constructed is built on the skeleton of a tetrahedron or triangular pyramid. Exercise: Visualize the tetrahedron which was augmented to form your cube. A natural next step is to use the star-building unit to augment the faces of other structures constructed from equilateral triangles. This class of structures is referred to as deltahedra; the strictly convex deltahedra were classified by Rausenberger [6] in 1915 and, independently, by Freundenthal and van der Waerden [4] in 1947. There are exactly 8 such polyhedra: the tetrahedron, triangular bipyramid, octahedron, pentagonal bipyramid, snub disphenoid, triaugmented triangular prism or tetracaidecadeltahedron, gyroelongated square bipyramid, and icosahedron. Exercise: Use the Euler characteristic (number of vertices) − (number of edges) + (number of faces) = 2 and the fact that all faces of a deltahedron are triangles to explain why there are at most 9 strictly convex deltahedra. Hint: At most five faces may meet at each vertex. Exercise: Show that there is no strictly convex deltahedron with 18 faces by attempting to draw the edge graph of such an object. After creasing the star-building unit along the diagonals of the cube’s faces and folding three new units, one has the components to build an augmented triangular bipyramid. Models of the strictly convex deltahedra will be provided at the workshop and their images are readily available online [7]; folding new units three at a time permits a leisurely exploration of the strictly convex deltahedra and their properties. ...and Beyond As long as the dihedral angles between triangles provide space to erect pyramids above or below the faces, star building units can be assembled to cover any structure made up of equilateral — or nearly equilateral — triangles. Participants are encouraged to explore these structures beyond the workshop, on their own or in collaboration with others. Exercise (unsolved?): Characterize structures which can be assembled using only star-building units. References [1] H. M. Cundy, Deltahedra, The mathematical gazette, 36.318 (1952), pp. 263-266. [2] N. Fout, J. Marker, Folding Your Way to Understanding, Bridges 2011: Mathematics, Music, Art, Architecture, Culture, (2011), pp. 671-678. [3] B. Franco, Unfolding Mathematics with Unit Origami (1999), Key Curriculum Press. [4] H. Freudenthal, B. L. van der Waerden, Over een bewering van Euclides, Simon Stevin 25 (1947), pp. 115–128. [5] D. Lister, Origins of the Sonobe Module, http://www.britishorigami.info/academic/ lister/sonobe.php (as of April 17, 2015). [6] O. Rausenberger, Konvexe pseudoregulare¨ Polyeder, Zeitschrift fur¨ mathematischen und naturwis- senschaftlichen Unterricht 45 (1915), pp. 135-142. [7] H. Schepker, The Convex Deltahedra, http://glassgeometry.com/polyhedra/slides/ deltahedra.htm (as of April 17, 2015). 588.
Recommended publications
  • How to Make an Origami Octahedron Ball
    How to make an Origami Octahedron Ball Introduction: These instructions will teach you how to make an origami octahedron. The ball is constructed by assembling 12 folded units together. A unit This is called a Sonobe unit, named after the person who invented them. The process of using identical units and assembling them in a pattern to create large, complex, beautiful structures is considered modular origami. This type of origami requires multiple sheets of paper to make a model. By varying the number of units, you can make several other shapes. A cube requires 6 units and an icosahedron requires 30. Time Frame: 30 minutes Materials: 2- 8.5”x11” sheets of paper (Multi-colored ball: use 3 different colored sheets of paper) Scissors Ruler (measures inches) Pencil Preparation: Make sure you have enough space and a flat surface to fold the origami. Procedure: Step 1. Cut 12 – 3”x3” square pieces of paper Note: The size of the squares depends on your preference of how large you want the ball to be. These instructions create a ball that fits in your hand. To save time, origami squares (4”x4”) can be used and step 1 skipped. 1.1. Draw 6 squares that are 3”x3” on a sheet of paper with the pencil and ruler. Note: For a multi-color effect, as depicted in these instructions, use 3 different colors of paper and cut 4 squares from each. 1.2.Stack the second sheet of paper behind the first. 1.3. Cut out 12 squares of paper with the scissors.
    [Show full text]
  • Sonobe Origami Units
    Sonobe Origami Units Crease paper down the middle Fold edges to center line and Fold top right and bottom left Fold triangles down to make and unfold unfold corners | do not let the sharper triangles | do not triangles cross crease lines cross the crease lines Fold along vertical crease lines Fold top left corner down to Fold bottom right corner up to Undo the last two folds right edge left edge Tuck upper left corner under Turn the paper over, crease Corners of one module ¯t into along dashed lines as shown to flap on opposite side and pockets of another A cube requires six modules repeat for lower right corner complete the module Sonobe modules also make many other polyhedra Where's the Math in Origami? Origami may not seem like it involves very much mathematics. Yes, origami involves symmetry. If we build a polyhedron then, sure, we encounter a shape from geometry. Is that as far as it goes? Do any interesting mathematical questions arise from the process of folding paper? Is there any deep mathematics in origami? Is the mathematics behind origami useful for anything other than making pretty decorations? People who spend time folding paper often ask themselves questions that are ultimately mathematical in nature. Is there a simpler procedure for folding a certain ¯gure? Where on the original square paper do the wings of a crane come from? What size paper should I use to make a chair to sit at the origami table I already made? Is it possible to make an origami beetle that has six legs and two antennae from a single square sheet of paper? Is there a precise procedure for folding a paper into ¯ve equal strips? In the last few decades, folders inspired by questions like these have revolutionized origami by bringing mathematical techniques to their art.
    [Show full text]
  • Barn-Raising an Endo-Pentakis-Icosi-Dodecaherdon
    BRIDGES Mathematical Connections in Art, Music, and Science Barn-Raising an Endo-Pentakis-Icosi-Dodecaherdon Eva Knoll and Simon Morgan Rice University Rice University School Mathematics Project MS-172 6100 Main Street Houston, Texas 77005 [email protected] Abstract The workshop is planned as the raising of an endo-pentakis-icosi-dodecaherdon with a 1 meter edge length. This collective experience will give the participants new insights about polyhedra in general. and deltahedra in particular. The specific method of construction applied here. using kite technology and the snowflake layout allows for a perspective entirely different from that found in the construction of hand-held models or the observation of computer animations. In the present case. the participants will be able to pace the area of the flat shape and physically enter the space defined by the polyhedron. Introduction 1.1 The Workshop. The event is set up so that the audience participates actively in the construction. First, the triangles are laid out by six groups of people in order to complete the net. Then the deltahedron is assembled collectively, under the direction of the artist. The large scale of the event is designed expressly to give the participant a new point of view with regards to polyhedra. Instead of the "God's eye view" of hand held shapes, or the tunnel vision allowed by computer modelling, the barn-raising will give the opportunity to observe the deltahedron on a human scale, where the shape's structure is tangible in terms of the whole body, not limited to the finger tips and the eye.
    [Show full text]
  • Uniform Panoploid Tetracombs
    Uniform Panoploid Tetracombs George Olshevsky TETRACOMB is a four-dimensional tessellation. In any tessellation, the honeycells, which are the n-dimensional polytopes that tessellate the space, Amust by definition adjoin precisely along their facets, that is, their ( n!1)- dimensional elements, so that each facet belongs to exactly two honeycells. In the case of tetracombs, the honeycells are four-dimensional polytopes, or polychora, and their facets are polyhedra. For a tessellation to be uniform, the honeycells must all be uniform polytopes, and the vertices must be transitive on the symmetry group of the tessellation. Loosely speaking, therefore, the vertices must be “surrounded all alike” by the honeycells that meet there. If a tessellation is such that every point of its space not on a boundary between honeycells lies in the interior of exactly one honeycell, then it is panoploid. If one or more points of the space not on a boundary between honeycells lie inside more than one honeycell, the tessellation is polyploid. Tessellations may also be constructed that have “holes,” that is, regions that lie inside none of the honeycells; such tessellations are called holeycombs. It is possible for a polyploid tessellation to also be a holeycomb, but not for a panoploid tessellation, which must fill the entire space exactly once. Polyploid tessellations are also called starcombs or star-tessellations. Holeycombs usually arise when (n!1)-dimensional tessellations are themselves permitted to be honeycells; these take up the otherwise free facets that bound the “holes,” so that all the facets continue to belong to two honeycells. In this essay, as per its title, we are concerned with just the uniform panoploid tetracombs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geometry Junkyard: Origami
    Table of Contents Table of Contents 1 Origami 2 Origami The Japanese art of paper folding is obviously geometrical in nature. Some origami masters have looked at constructing geometric figures such as regular polyhedra from paper. In the other direction, some people have begun using computers to help fold more traditional origami designs. This idea works best for tree-like structures, which can be formed by laying out the tree onto a paper square so that the vertices are well separated from each other, allowing room to fold up the remaining paper away from the tree. Bern and Hayes (SODA 1996) asked, given a pattern of creases on a square piece of paper, whether one can find a way of folding the paper along those creases to form a flat origami shape; they showed this to be NP-complete. Related theoretical questions include how many different ways a given pattern of creases can be folded, whether folding a flat polygon from a square always decreases the perimeter, and whether it is always possible to fold a square piece of paper so that it forms (a small copy of) a given flat polygon. Krystyna Burczyk's Origami Gallery - regular polyhedra. The business card Menger sponge project. Jeannine Mosely wants to build a fractal cube out of 66048 business cards. The MIT Origami Club has already made a smaller version of the same shape. Cardahedra. Business card polyhedral origami. Cranes, planes, and cuckoo clocks. Announcement for a talk on mathematical origami by Robert Lang. Crumpling paper: states of an inextensible sheet. Cut-the-knot logo.
    [Show full text]
  • Order in Space
    Order in space A.K. van der Vegt VSSD Other textbooks on mathematics, published by VSSD Mathematical Systems Theory, G. Olsder and J.W. van der Woude, x + 210 pp. See http://www.vssd.nl/hlf/a003.htm Numerical Methods in Scientific Computing, J. van Kan, A. Segal and F. Vermolen, xii + 279 pp. See http://www.vssd.nl/hlf/a002.htm By the author of Order in space: From Plastics to Polymers, A.K. van der Vegt, 268 pp. See http://www.vssd.nl/hlf/m028.htm © VSSD Edition on the internet, 2001 Printed edition 2006 Published by: VSSD Leeghwaterstraat 42, 2628 CA Delft, The Netherlands tel. +31 15 27 82124, telefax +31 15 27 87585, e-mail: [email protected] internet: http://www.vssd.nl/hlf URL about this book: http://www.vssd.nl/hlf/a017.htm A collection of digital pictures and/or an electronic version can be made available for lecturers who adopt this book. Please send a request by e-mail to [email protected] All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photo-copying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. NUR 918 ISBN-10: 90-71301-61-3 ISBN-13: 978-90-71301-61-2 Keywords: geometry 3 PREFACE This book deals with a very old subject. Many centuries ago some people were already fascinated by polyhedra, and they spent much time in investigating regular spatial structures. In the terminology of polyhedra we, therefore, meet the names of Archimedes, Pythagoras, Plato, Kepler etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Assembly of One-Patch Colloids Into Clusters Via Emulsion Droplet Evaporation
    materials Article Assembly of One-Patch Colloids into Clusters via Emulsion Droplet Evaporation Hai Pham Van 1,2, Andrea Fortini 3 and Matthias Schmidt 1,* 1 Theoretische Physik II, Physikalisches Institut, Universität Bayreuth, Universitätsstraße 30, D-95440 Bayreuth, Germany 2 Department of Physics, Hanoi National University of Education, 136 Xuanthuy, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam; [email protected] 3 Department of Physics, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +49-921-55-3313 Academic Editors: Andrei V. Petukhov and Gert Jan Vroege Received: 23 February 2017; Accepted: 27 March 2017; Published: 29 March 2017 Abstract: We study the cluster structures of one-patch colloidal particles generated by droplet evaporation using Monte Carlo simulations. The addition of anisotropic patch–patch interaction between the colloids produces different cluster configurations. We find a well-defined category of sphere packing structures that minimize the second moment of mass distribution when the attractive surface coverage of the colloids c is larger than 0.3. For c < 0.3, the uniqueness of the packing structures is lost, and several different isomers are found. A further decrease of c below 0.2 leads to formation of many isomeric structures with less dense packings. Our results could provide an explanation of the occurrence of uncommon cluster configurations in the literature observed experimentally through evaporation-driven assembly. Keywords: one-patch colloid; Janus colloid; cluster; emulsion-assisted assembly; Pickering effect 1. Introduction Packings of colloidal particles in regular structures are of great interest in colloid science. One particular class of such packings is formed by colloidal clusters which can be regarded as colloidal analogues to small molecules, i.e., “colloidal molecules” [1,2].
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2105.14305V1 [Cs.CG] 29 May 2021
    Efficient Folding Algorithms for Regular Polyhedra ∗ Tonan Kamata1 Akira Kadoguchi2 Takashi Horiyama3 Ryuhei Uehara1 1 School of Information Science, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (JAIST), Ishikawa, Japan fkamata,[email protected] 2 Intelligent Vision & Image Systems (IVIS), Tokyo, Japan [email protected] 3 Faculty of Information Science and Technology, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido, Japan [email protected] Abstract We investigate the folding problem that asks if a polygon P can be folded to a polyhedron Q for given P and Q. Recently, an efficient algorithm for this problem has been developed when Q is a box. We extend this idea to regular polyhedra, also known as Platonic solids. The basic idea of our algorithms is common, which is called stamping. However, the computational complexities of them are different depending on their geometric properties. We developed four algorithms for the problem as follows. (1) An algorithm for a regular tetrahedron, which can be extended to a tetramonohedron. (2) An algorithm for a regular hexahedron (or a cube), which is much efficient than the previously known one. (3) An algorithm for a general deltahedron, which contains the cases that Q is a regular octahedron or a regular icosahedron. (4) An algorithm for a regular dodecahedron. Combining these algorithms, we can conclude that the folding problem can be solved pseudo-polynomial time when Q is a regular polyhedron and other related solid. Keywords: Computational origami folding problem pseudo-polynomial time algorithm regular poly- hedron (Platonic solids) stamping 1 Introduction In 1525, the German painter Albrecht D¨urerpublished his masterwork on geometry [5], whose title translates as \On Teaching Measurement with a Compass and Straightedge for lines, planes, and whole bodies." In the book, he presented each polyhedron by drawing a net, which is an unfolding of the surface of the polyhedron to a planar layout without overlapping by cutting along its edges.
    [Show full text]
  • Hexagonal Antiprism Tetragonal Bipyramid Dodecahedron
    Call List hexagonal antiprism tetragonal bipyramid dodecahedron hemisphere icosahedron cube triangular bipyramid sphere octahedron cone triangular prism pentagonal bipyramid torus cylinder square­based pyramid octagonal prism cuboid hexagonal prism pentagonal prism tetrahedron cube octahedron square antiprism ellipsoid pentagonal antiprism spheroid Created using www.BingoCardPrinter.com B I N G O hexagonal triangular square­based tetrahedron antiprism cube prism pyramid tetragonal triangular pentagonal octagonal cube bipyramid bipyramid bipyramid prism octahedron Free square dodecahedron sphere Space cuboid antiprism hexagonal hemisphere octahedron torus prism ellipsoid pentagonal pentagonal icosahedron cone cylinder prism antiprism Created using www.BingoCardPrinter.com B I N G O triangular pentagonal triangular hemisphere cube prism antiprism bipyramid pentagonal hexagonal tetragonal torus bipyramid prism bipyramid cone square Free hexagonal octagonal tetrahedron antiprism Space antiprism prism square­based dodecahedron ellipsoid cylinder octahedron pyramid pentagonal icosahedron sphere prism cuboid spheroid Created using www.BingoCardPrinter.com B I N G O cube hexagonal triangular icosahedron octahedron prism torus prism octagonal square dodecahedron hemisphere spheroid prism antiprism Free pentagonal octahedron square­based pyramid Space cube antiprism hexagonal pentagonal triangular cone antiprism cuboid bipyramid bipyramid tetragonal cylinder tetrahedron ellipsoid bipyramid sphere Created using www.BingoCardPrinter.com B I N G O
    [Show full text]
  • Paper Pentasia: an Aperiodic Surface in Modular Origami
    Paper Pentasia: An Aperiodic Surface in Modular Origami a b Robert J. Lang ∗ and Barry Hayes † aLangorigami.com, Alamo, California, USA, bStanford University, Stanford, CA 2013-05-26 Origami, the Japanese art of paper-folding, has numerous connections to mathematics, but some of the most direct appear in the genre of modular origami. In modular origami, one folds many sheets into identical units (or a few types of unit), and then fits the units together into larger constructions, most often, some polyhedral form. Modular origami is a diverse and dynamic field, with many practitioners (see, e.g., [12, 3]). While most modular origami is created primarily for its artistic or decorative value, it can be used effectively in mathematics education to provide physical models of geometric forms ranging from the Platonic solids to 900-unit pentagon-hexagon-heptagon torii [5]. As mathematicians have expanded their catalog of interesting solids and surfaces, origami designers have followed not far behind, rendering mathematical forms via folding, a notable recent example being a level-3 Menger Sponge folded from 66,048 business cards by Jeannine Mosely and co-workers [10]. In some cases, the origami explorations themselves can lead to new mathematical structures and/or insights. Mosely’s developments of business-card modulars led to the discovery of a new fractal polyhedron with a novel connection to the famous Snowflake curve [11]. One of the most popular geometric mathematical objects has been the sets of aperiodic tilings developed by Roger Penrose [14, 15], which acquired new significance with the dis- covery of quasi-crystals, their three-dimensional analogs in the physical world, in 1982 by Daniel Schechtman, who was awarded the 2011 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for his discovery.
    [Show full text]
  • Decomposing Deltahedra
    Decomposing Deltahedra Eva Knoll EK Design ([email protected]) Abstract Deltahedra are polyhedra with all equilateral triangular faces of the same size. We consider a class of we will call ‘regular’ deltahedra which possess the icosahedral rotational symmetry group and have either six or five triangles meeting at each vertex. Some, but not all of this class can be generated using operations of subdivision, stellation and truncation on the platonic solids. We develop a method of generating and classifying all deltahedra in this class using the idea of a generating vector on a triangular grid that is made into the net of the deltahedron. We observed and proved a geometric property of the length of these generating vectors and the surface area of the corresponding deltahedra. A consequence of this is that all deltahedra in our class have an integer multiple of 20 faces, starting with the icosahedron which has the minimum of 20 faces. Introduction The Japanese art of paper folding traditionally uses square or sometimes rectangular paper. The geometric styles such as modular Origami [4] reflect that paradigm in that the folds are determined by the geometry of the paper (the diagonals and bisectors of existing angles and lines). Using circular paper creates a completely different design structure. The fact that chords of radial length subdivide the circumference exactly 6 times allows the use of a 60 degree grid system [5]. This makes circular Origami a great tool to experiment with deltahedra (Deltahedra are polyhedra bound by equilateral triangles exclusively [3], [8]). After the barn-raising of an endo-pentakis icosi-dodecahedron (an 80 faced regular deltahedron) [Knoll & Morgan, 1999], an investigation of related deltahedra ensued.
    [Show full text]
  • Convex Polytopes and Tilings with Few Flag Orbits
    Convex Polytopes and Tilings with Few Flag Orbits by Nicholas Matteo B.A. in Mathematics, Miami University M.A. in Mathematics, Miami University A dissertation submitted to The Faculty of the College of Science of Northeastern University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy April 14, 2015 Dissertation directed by Egon Schulte Professor of Mathematics Abstract of Dissertation The amount of symmetry possessed by a convex polytope, or a tiling by convex polytopes, is reflected by the number of orbits of its flags under the action of the Euclidean isometries preserving the polytope. The convex polytopes with only one flag orbit have been classified since the work of Schläfli in the 19th century. In this dissertation, convex polytopes with up to three flag orbits are classified. Two-orbit convex polytopes exist only in two or three dimensions, and the only ones whose combinatorial automorphism group is also two-orbit are the cuboctahedron, the icosidodecahedron, the rhombic dodecahedron, and the rhombic triacontahedron. Two-orbit face-to-face tilings by convex polytopes exist on E1, E2, and E3; the only ones which are also combinatorially two-orbit are the trihexagonal plane tiling, the rhombille plane tiling, the tetrahedral-octahedral honeycomb, and the rhombic dodecahedral honeycomb. Moreover, any combinatorially two-orbit convex polytope or tiling is isomorphic to one on the above list. Three-orbit convex polytopes exist in two through eight dimensions. There are infinitely many in three dimensions, including prisms over regular polygons, truncated Platonic solids, and their dual bipyramids and Kleetopes. There are infinitely many in four dimensions, comprising the rectified regular 4-polytopes, the p; p-duoprisms, the bitruncated 4-simplex, the bitruncated 24-cell, and their duals.
    [Show full text]