DOCSLIB.ORG

Planning Commission 433 River St., Ste

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Planning Commission 433 River St., Ste Wm. Patrick Madden Steven Strichman Mayor Commissioner of Planning Monica Kurzejeski Phone: (518) 279-7166 Deputy Mayor [email protected] Planning Commission 433 River St., Ste. 5001 Troy, New York 12180 Meeting Minutes January 28th, 2021 @ 6:00 pm The Planning Commission of the City of Troy, New York conducted a public hearing on Thursday, 28 January, 2021 at 6:00pm via Zoom Conferencing, in order to hear and decide on proposals for development as follows: 6:00pm – Meeting called to order Commissioners in Attendance Deirdre “Dede” Rudolph (DR), Anthony Mohen (AM), Sara Wengert (SW) Commissioners Absent Suzanne Spellen (SS), Barbara Higbee (BH) Also in Attendance Andy Brick (Planning and Zoning Attorney), Aaron Vera (Executive Secretary) Consent PLPC 2021 0001 – St. Peter’s Parish at 5th and Hutton (101.30-8-32 & 101.30-8-33) Change of Use (SEQR Type II) (101 .30-8-32) Renovate an existing 6-unit residential building (rectory) into an 8-unit apartment building. Existing footprint to remain. (101 .30-8-33) Renovate an existing 3-unit apartment building. Existing footprint to remain. • Applicant Presentation. • BH in attendance. • Request for public comment. No comment. • SS in attendance. • AM motion to approve, SW seconded. Absent Yes No Abstain Recused Deirdre Rudolph X Sara Wengert X Suzanne Spellen X Barbara Higbee X Anthony Mohen X Motion to approve passed, 5-0. Page 1 of 4 City of Troy Meeting Minutes Planning Commission 28 January, 2021 Old Business PLPC 2020 0046 – 770 Pawling Ave. (112.84-4-2) Site Plan Review (Type II SEQR) J & J Apartments, LLC is proposing to occupy an existing commercial space with three (3) residential units. • Applicant presentation. • Request for public comment. No comment. • Comments from SW. Improvements are not satisfactory. • Comments from DR. • SW motion to deny, DR seconded. Absent Yes No Abstain Recused Deirdre Rudolph X Sara Wengert X Suzanne Spellen X Barbara Higbee X Anthony Mohen X Motion to deny passed, 3-2. PLPC 2020 0011 – Kings Landing II (101.38-9-10) Site Plan Review and SEQR Determination (Type I) BDC Holdings, LLC is proposing to demolish three (3) existing structures and construct a new five-story building with 62 residential units and two levels of parking (68 spaces). The applicant is represented by Nicholas Costa, P.E. of Advance Engineering. • Applicant presentation. • SW motion to open public comment, AM seconded the sentiment. th Drea Leanza 2227 5 Ave. – Discussed SHPO letter from October. o nd o Joe Fama 160 2 Ave. – Various comments on the EAF. Doris Day Bethel Baptist Church – Discussed impact to neighborhood. o th o John Waite 1920 5 Ave. – Discussed historic significance and rehab of existing buildings. o Tom Kutcher – In favor. o Bill Hughes – In favor. o Matt Baumgartner – In favor. o Barbara Nelson – Discussed historic significance and rehab of existing buildings. o Catherine Skopic – Wrong project. Brad Lewis – Applicant working with salvaging companies. o th Barbara Higbee 2167 5 Ave. – Not enough parking, not in character with neighborhood. o th o Trudy Hanmer 2142 5 Ave. – Echoed comments against the project. • AM motion to close the public hearing, SW seconded. Absent Yes No Abstain Recused Deirdre Rudolph X Sara Wengert X Suzanne Spellen X Barbara Higbee X Anthony Mohen X Motion to close public hearing passed, 4-0. Page 2 of 4 City of Troy Meeting Minutes Planning Commission 28 January, 2021 • AM motion to table, SW seconded. Absent Yes No Abstain Recused Deirdre Rudolph X Sara Wengert X Suzanne Spellen X Barbara Higbee X Anthony Mohen X Motion to table indefinitely passed, 4-0. PLPC 2020 0031 – 101-119 County Garden Apartments (112.-4-36.411 & 112.-4-36.412) Site Plan Review and SEQR Determination (Unlisted) Country Garden Acres Limited is proposing 21 new low rise structures containing 144 new dwelling units. The applicant is represented by Roger Keating of Chazen Companies. • Applicant presentation. • SW motion to table, SS seconded. Absent Yes No Abstain Recused Deirdre Rudolph X Sara Wengert X Suzanne Spellen X Barbara Higbee X Anthony Mohen X Motion to table indefinitely passed, 5-0. PLPC 2020 0073 – Taylor Apartments (100.68-1-1./1) Site Plan Review and SEQR Determination (Type I) Taylor I, LLC is proposing to demolish the vacant Taylor 1 and 2 towers and construct a 90-unit, 96,400 sq. ft. mixed-use, mixed income building that includes 64 replacement affordable housing units set aside for existing residents of the currently occupied Taylor 4 building. The applicant is represented by Roger Keating of Chazen Companies. • Applicant presentation. • Request for public comment. o Liz Malone – How is parking being provided? o Joe Fama – Questions regarding pedestrian circulation. • Discussion of building elevations. • Motion to table to next meeting 2/17, BH seconded. Absent Yes No Abstain Recused Deirdre Rudolph X Sara Wengert X Suzanne Spellen X Barbara Higbee X Anthony Mohen X Motion to table until 2/17 passed, 4-0. Page 3 of 4 City of Troy Meeting Minutes Planning Commission 28 January, 2021 Recommendations 1011 2nd Ave. (101.38-9-10) Planning Commission Recommendation to the City Council for Zone Change Kevin Vandenburgh is proposing a zone change from R-1 (Single-Family Residential Detached, §285-52) to P (Planned Development, §285-57). Pursuant to §285-27 of the City Code a public hearing is required. The applicant is represented by Jamie Easton, P.E. Applicant presentation. SW motion to close public hearing, AM seconded. Absent Yes No Abstain Recused Deirdre Rudolph X Sara Wengert X Suzanne Spellen X Barbara Higbee X Anthony Mohen X Motion to close public hearing passed, 5-0. Commissioner discussion. SW motion to recommend against zoning change AM seconded. Absent Yes No Abstain Recused Deirdre Rudolph X Sara Wengert X Suzanne Spellen X Barbara Higbee X Anthony Mohen X Motion to recommend against zoning change passed, 4-1. SS motion to adjourn, AM seconded. All in favor. Page 4 of 4 TROY’s SACRED FOREST Its culture, ecology, history, archaeology, and signifi cance to the community. SPECIAL THANKS TO THE MEMBERS OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE, AND CONTRIBUTORS Leo Matteo Bachinger, PhD (Environment, Climate, Community Development) Jessica Bennett (Neighbor, Friends of the Mahicantuck) Dr. Brandon Costelloe-Kuehn (Science, Technology and Society, Sustainable Design) Dr. David Hunt (Ecology) James Kruegler (Water Resources) Sarah Pezdek (Friends of the Mahicantuck) Hined Rafeh, MS (Public Health & Policy) Prof. Don Rittner (Archaeology) Bethany Yarrow (Waterfall Unity Alliance) TROY’s SACRED FOREST Its culture, ecology, history, archaeology, and significance to the community. compiled and published by The Friends of the Mahicantuck www.save1011.org [email protected] and submitted for consideration to Mayor of the City of Troy, Patrick Madden President of the City Council of Troy, Carmella Mantello Planning Commissioner of the City of Troy, Steven Strichman The Members of the Troy City Council The Members of the Planning Commission January 22, 2020 Troy, NY COVER LETTER Dear Mayor Patrick Madden, With this report, the Friends of the Mahicantuck provide City Council President Carmella Mantello, comprehensive analysis of the signifi cance of the “Sacred Members of the City Council, Forest” located at 1011 2nd Avenue. We provide an assessment Planning Commissioner Steven Strichman, of adverse impacts associated with the potential change in and Members of the Planning Commission, zoning code as well as potential development of the site. The fi ndings underscore the unique importance of the “Sacred Forest” and highlight its economic, cultural, ecological, archaeological and historical, and social value. In its signifi cance, this site is unique to the entire region. This report shows the site’s benefi ts to human health; its natural setting; social, cultural, historic, archaeological and recreational values; and inherent ecological sensitivity. The site at 1011 2nd Avenue thereby warrants designation as Critical Environmental Area (CEA), exceeding the designation criteria established in CRR-NY 617.14(g) — which we request the City of Troy to pursue as soon as possible. The report provides an ecosystem service analysis, detailing the signifi cant benefi ts to health and wellbeing for the resi- dents of Troy, Pleasantdale as well as downstream communi- ties. The site is an important indigenous heritage and cultural site of national signifi cance (National Register eligible) and is an important green-space within the designated “Potential Environmental Justice area” that it is located in. Ecological surveys, conducted in December 2020 and January 2021 and included in this report, document several county- rare as well as one state-rare species at the site. The survey also documents the site as potentially sensitive habitat for several species, including as feeding habitat of the Bald Eagle. An economic cost-benefi t analysis shows disproportionate direct as well as indirect costs resulting from the rezoning and associated development of the site. This includes a negative revenue assessment for the school district as well as for the City of Troy. 4 “Lost opportunity costs” must be expected particularly Over 2300 signatures to our petition, more than eight hours regarding the development of the city’s vacant housing stock. of testimony against the rezoning at three public hearings, as Allowing for high density development on this undeveloped well as countless written submissions show that your site would significantly impact Troy’s capacities to develop its constituents are united across party-lines in opposition to vacant housing stock due to insufficient demand. This is con- the proposed rezoning and subsequent development of the firmed through the most recent forecast issued by US HUD Sacred Forest at 1011 2nd Avenue in Lansingburgh. for the region. What is more, the public also shows clear and unbroken Therefore, a rezoning would undermine the strategic support for our vision to protect and preserve this land.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Adapted from the Senior Year Thesis of Roselyne Laboso
    Loading of elements and anions to the St. Lawrence River from tributaries in St. Lawrence County, New York Report‡ June 25, 2014 ‡Adapted from the Senior Year Thesis of Roselyne Laboso TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 2 2. GEOLOGIC SETTING .............................................................................................................................. 9 3. METHODS .............................................................................................................................................. 11 3.1 Instrument calibration .................................................................................................................... 11 3.2 Sampling Collection ......................................................................................................................... 11 3.3 Instrument and chromatographic conditions ................................................................................. 12 3.4 Standard preparation for Ion Chromatography .............................................................................. 12 3.5 Acid Neutralizing Capacity and Alkalinity ........................................................................................ 12 3.6 Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP‐MS) analysis .............................................. 14 3.7 Quality Assurance analysis ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Event of 5/27/1946 - 5/29/1946
    Flood Event of 5/27/1946 - 5/29/1946 Chemung Site Flood Stage Date Crest Flow Category Basin Stream County of Gage County of Forecast Point Chemung 16.00 5/28/1946 23.97 132,000 Moderate Chemung Chemung River Chemung Chemung Corning 29.00 5/28/1946 37.74 -9,999 Major Chemung Chemung River Steuben Steuben Elmira 12.00 5/28/1946 21.20 -9,999 Major Chemung Chemung River Chemung Chemung Lindley 17.00 5/28/1946 22.87 75,000 Major Chemung Tioga River Steuben Steuben West Cameron 17.00 5/28/1946 18.09 17,600 Moderate Chemung Canisteo River Steuben Steuben Juniata Site Flood Stage Date Crest Flow Category Basin Stream County of Gage County of Forecast Point Spruce Creek 8.00 5/27/1946 9.02 5,230 Minor Juniata Little Juniata River Huntingdon Huntingdon Main Stem Susquehanna Site Flood Stage Date Crest Flow Category Basin Stream County of Gage County of Forecast Point Bloomsburg 19.00 5/29/1946 25.20 234,000 Moderate Upper Main Stem Susquehanna River Columbia Columbia Susquehanna Danville 20.00 5/29/1946 25.98 234,000 Moderate Upper Main Stem Susquehanna River Montour Montour Susquehanna Harper Tavern 9.00 5/28/1946 9.47 7,620 Minor Swatara Swatara Creek Lebanon Lebanon Harrisburg 17.00 5/29/1946 21.80 494,000 Moderate Lower Main Stem Susquehanna River Dauphin Dauphin Susquehanna Hogestown 8.00 5/28/1946 9.43 8,910 Minor Conodoguinet Conodoguinet Creek Cumberland Cumberland Created On: 8/16/2016 Page 1 of 4 Marietta 49.00 5/29/1946 54.90 492,000 Major Lower Main Stem Susquehanna River Lancaster Lancaster Susquehanna Penns Creek 8.00 5/27/1946 9.79
    [Show full text]
  • Partnership to Examine the Condition of Regional Lakes and Their Influence on Tributaries of the St
    Partnership to Examine the Condition of Regional Lakes and their Influence on Tributaries of the St. Lawrence River Brad Baldwin St. Lawrence University Introduction The lakes of northern New York (NNY) support abundant and diverse wildlife communities as well as a variety of valuable human uses. Given the relatively remote and undisturbed condition of our region, these water bodies are attractive and appear to be healthy and thriving. However, certain of these regional ecosystems are showing signs of human impact and degradation and need to be carefully managed. For example, the US Environmental Protection Agency found that over 60% of nearly 350 lakes across 8 New England states (including NY) showed one to several types of ecosystem stress (Whittier et al. 2002). Two of the most familiar forms of disturbance are lake acidification and cultural eutrophication. Many lakes in our Adirondack region are acidified while eutrophication is common in lowland lakes situated in drainage basins with high levels of agriculture (Whittier et al. 2002, Carpenter et al. 2007). Shoreline development can also cause eutrophication (Whittier et al. 2002, Moore et al. 2003) and, along with clearance of natural riparian vegetation, lake fish communities have become degraded (Whittier et al. 2002, Carpenter et al. 2007). More recent work also stresses the impacts of atmospheric mercury deposition and exotic species invasions. Mercury is biomagnifying in many lake food webs and causing certain sport fish to become so toxic that humans need to limit their consumption of these fish (Whittier et al. 2002, Evers et al. 2007). Also, as humans move between lakes we spread non-native species (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Susquehanna Riyer Drainage Basin
    'M, General Hydrographic Water-Supply and Irrigation Paper No. 109 Series -j Investigations, 13 .N, Water Power, 9 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIRECTOR HYDROGRAPHY OF THE SUSQUEHANNA RIYER DRAINAGE BASIN BY JOHN C. HOYT AND ROBERT H. ANDERSON WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1 9 0 5 CONTENTS. Page. Letter of transmittaL_.__.______.____.__..__.___._______.._.__..__..__... 7 Introduction......---..-.-..-.--.-.-----............_-........--._.----.- 9 Acknowledgments -..___.______.._.___.________________.____.___--_----.. 9 Description of drainage area......--..--..--.....-_....-....-....-....--.- 10 General features- -----_.____._.__..__._.___._..__-____.__-__---------- 10 Susquehanna River below West Branch ___...______-_--__.------_.--. 19 Susquehanna River above West Branch .............................. 21 West Branch ....................................................... 23 Navigation .--..........._-..........-....................-...---..-....- 24 Measurements of flow..................-.....-..-.---......-.-..---...... 25 Susquehanna River at Binghamton, N. Y_-..---...-.-...----.....-..- 25 Ghenango River at Binghamton, N. Y................................ 34 Susquehanna River at Wilkesbarre, Pa......_............-...----_--. 43 Susquehanna River at Danville, Pa..........._..................._... 56 West Branch at Williamsport, Pa .._.................--...--....- _ - - 67 West Branch at Allenwood, Pa.....-........-...-.._.---.---.-..-.-.. 84 Juniata River at Newport, Pa...-----......--....-...-....--..-..---.-
    [Show full text]
  • Cohoes-Waterford Concept Plan.Pub
    Cohoes—Waterford Canalway Trail Connection Study Prepared for New York State Canal Corporation By Parks and Trails New York Final Draft Version Cohoes-Waterford Canalway Trail Connection Study Final Draft Version September 2004 Page 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................ 2 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ 3 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 5 Existing trail initiatives in the study area ...................................................................... 6 Purpose of Study .......................................................................................................... 7 Inventory and Analysis of Study Area ................................................................................. 7 Canalway Trail Resources ........................................................................................... 7 Waterford Canal Harbor Visitor Center ........................................................................9 Hudson Valley Greenway Trail ...................................................................................10 Street System Resources ................................................................................................. 11 Streets .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The New York State Flood of July 1935
    Please do not destroy or throw away this publication. If you have no further use for it write to the Geological Survey at Washington and ask for a frank to return it UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Harold L. Ickes, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. C. Mendenhall, Director Water-Supply Paper 773 E THE NEW YORK STATE FLOOD OF JULY 1935 BY HOLLISTER JOHNSON Prepared in cooperation with the Water Power and Control Commission of the Conservation Department and the Department of Public Works, State of New York Contributions to the hydrology of the United States, 1936 (Pages 233-268) UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1936 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. C. -------- Price 15 cents CONTENTS Page Introduction......................................................... 233 Acknowledgments...................................................... 234 Rainfall,............................................................ 235 Causes.......................................................... 235 General features................................................ 236 Rainfall records................................................ 237 Flood discharges..................................................... 246 General features................................................ 246 Field work...................................................... 249 Office preparation of field data................................ 250 Assumptions and computations.................................... 251 Flood-discharge records........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Community Relations Plan
    f COMMUNITY RELATIONS PLAN HUDSON RIVER PCB REASSESSMENT RI/FS EPA WORK ASSIGNMENT NO. 013-2N84 DECEMBER, 1990 c»o REGION II ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE REMEDIAL SERVICES 3B » ^ EPA Contract No. 68-89-2001 o TAMS CONSULTANTS, Inc. u> 00 77 TAMS CONSULTANTS, INC. COMMUNITY RELATIONS PLAN HUDSON RIVER PCB REASSESSMENT RI/FS Contents Page 1. OVERVIEW OF THE COMMUNITY RELATIONS PLAN 1 2. SITE BACKGROUND 3 2.1 Site and Problem Description 2.2 Site History 3. AREA PROFILE 9 3.1 Geographic Characterization 3.2 Land Use, Facilities, and Lifestyle 4. COMMUNITY RELATIONS/PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROFILE 12 4.1 History of Community Involvement 4.2 Key Concerns and Anticipated issues 5. OBJECTIVES AND DESCRIPTION OF THE COMMUNITY INTERACTION PROGRAM (CIP) FOR THE HUDSON RIVER PCB REASSESSMENT RI/FS 16 5.1 Program Objectives 5.2 Program Description 6. COMMUNITY RELATIONS/PUBLIC PARTICIPATION ACTIVITIES 22 6.1 Basic Community Relations Activities 6.2 CiP-Specific Community Relations/Public Participation Activities 6.3 Optional Community Relations/Public 0 Participation Activities ^ o o CO (O HR-PCB.CRP/CONTENTS TAMS CONSULTANTS, INC. COMMUNITY RELATIONS PLAN HUDSON RIVER PCB REASSESSMENT RI/FS Appendices Page Appendix A Section 1 Governmental Liaison Group Committee Participation Mailing List 27 Section 2 Governmental Liaison Group Information Mailing List 35 Section 3 Citizen Liaison Group Committee Participation Mailing List 47 Section 4 Citizen Liaison Group Information Mailing List 54 Section 5 Environmental
    [Show full text]
  • Restorative Environments Through Holistic Sensory Impressions
    With all my senses: Restorative environments through holistic sensory impressions by Brid Sona A thesis presented to the University of Hohenheim in partial fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Doctor rerum socialium (Dr. rer. soc.) in Psychology Supervisor and primary reviewer of the doctoral thesis: Prof. Dr. Anna Steidle Secondary reviewer of the doctoral thesis: Prof. Dr. Sabine Trepte Chair of the defense: Prof. Dr. Marion Büttgen Dean of the Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences: Prof. Dr. Karsten Hadwich Submitted on 14.07.2017 Thesis defense on 07.11.2017 1 Acknowledgments Acknowledgments I would like to acknowledge the contribution of my supervisor, Prof. Dr. Anna Steidle, for her support and commitment throughout all stages of my thesis. We learned together to manage stressful days with a lot of humor and serenity, without losing sight of the essentials. Thank you so much for this experience! In addition, sincere thanks go to Prof. Dr. Sabine Trepte, the secondary reviewer of my doctoral thesis. Thank you for your interest in my work! I would also like to express my appreciation to Prof. Dr. Lioba Werth, who gave me the opportunity to be part of the interdisciplinary research team ‘People Inside’ and the chair of Industrial and Organizational Psychology at the University of Hohenheim. Without her support, this doctoral thesis could not have been achieved. Thank you very much indeed! Special thanks go to my awesome colleagues at the University of Hohenheim and the Graduate Program ‘People Inside’ for the scientific exchanges and countless hilarious lunches. I definitely learned what it means to share responsibility and that I can always rely on your encouragement.
    [Show full text]
  • IOB Evaluations
    IOB Evaluation | no. 324 IOB Evaluation | no. The economic and social infrastructure of many least developed countries is severely inadequate or even non-existent. One reason for this is the difficulty in obtaining long-term capital for IOB Evaluation investment in infrastructure. That is why the Dutch Minister for Development Cooperation established the Least Developed Countries (LDC) Infrastructure Fund in 2002. The Fund, which is managed by the Netherlands Development Finance Company (FMO), aims to stimulate private investment in infrastructure in LDCs. This report presents the results of an evaluation of the Fund’s first five years. Investing in infrastructure Policy and Operations Evaluation Department | IOB Evaluations | no. 324 | July 2009 | Policy and Operations Evaluation Department | IOB Evaluations | no. 324 | July 2009 Policy and Operations Evaluation Department | IOB Evaluations | no. 324 | July 2009 | Policy and Operations Evaluation Department | IOB Evaluations | no. 324 | July 2009 | EvaluationEvidence of the fromLDC Infrastructure developing Fund countries Investing in infrastructure Published by: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands P.O.Box 20061 | 2500 eb The Hague | The Netherlands www.minbuza.nl © Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands | July 2009 | OSDR/6642/E AbuDhabiAbujaAccraAddisAbebaAlgiersAlmatyAmmanAnkaraAntwerpenAsmaraAstanaAtheneBagdadBamakoBangkokBarcelonaBeiroetBelgradoBerlijnBernBoedapestBoekarestBogotáBrasiliaBratislavaBrusselBuenosAiresBujumburaCairoCanberraCaracasChicagoColomboCotonouDakarDamascusDarEsSalaamDenHaagDhakaDohaDublinDüsseldorfFrankfurt/MainGenèveGuangzhouGuatemalaHamburgHanoiHarareHavanna
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Annual Report
    Erie Canalway National Heritage Corridor t 2016 Annual Report 2016 Annual Report Annual e love the story of the Erie Canal: Building the Future its heroic engineering and Wconstruction; its hard-working laborers; its visionary leaders; its transfor- mative impact on New York and the nation. Wrapped in the history of the Erie Canal is the story of America itself: a nation that imagined big, pursued a bold agenda, and persevered to achieve greatness. At the end of the day though, the story resonates only if it rings true. The story lives on if we envision how this iconic waterway will serve the next century and if we are the architects and laborers that build the canal’s future. That is what we strive to do every day at the Erie Canalway National Heritage Corridor. Drawing from the canal’s playbook and our own award-winning Established in 2000 management plan, we are championing by an Act of Congress, the Corridor’s distinctive sense of place the Corridor spans 524 miles across the and protecting its heritage resources. full expanse of upstate We are working to maximize recreational New York. It includes the opportunities for those who live here and Erie, Cayuga-Seneca, for visitors from afar. And we are fostering Oswego, and Champlain economic sustainability and vibrant canals and their historic communities connected by our treasured alignments. The waterways. Corridor encompasses Together with our partners and thousands 4,834 square miles in of people across the state and nation who 23 counties and is home care deeply about this place, we are making to 3.2 million people.
    [Show full text]
  • WATERFALLS Guide GUIDE 1 T
    ST. LAWRENCE COUNTY EXPLORE Our Great Outdoors ® NYSDED, used w/permission WaterfallsWATERFALLS Guide GUIDE 1 t. Lawrence County’s waterfalls rank right at the top of the list of our natural attractions. SAcross the county – the biggest in New York State – are gorgeous waterfalls that for 200 years have been magnets for industry and recreation. Today, no matter what season, you can still experience the beauty of these moving waters. At many waterfalls there remain hints of the county’s history, including remnants of long-gone mills that were among the largest in the state. And the falls themselves tell of the area’s past. Some 15,000 years ago, this region lay beneath a two-mile thick sheet of ice. After the glaciers receded, rivers formed new channels, flowing over rock ledges and Waterfallscreating the waterfalls of today. Guide Each waterfall in the county has its own “personality.” If you don’t believe that, make your first stop the Tooley Pond Road section of the south branch of the Grasse River – you’ll find seven major waterfalls, all completely different in form as a response to the county’s geological history. 2 ST. LAWRENCE COUNTY THERE’S SO MUCH MORE TO EXPLORE If you love waterfalls, northern New York State is the place for you. From the 1000 Islands region, to the St. Lawrence River Valley, to the Adirondack Park – where there’s water, we’ve got waterfalls. For a multi-county guide to these natural wonders visit www.nnywaterfalls.com WHERE TO STAY, WHERE TO EAT, WHAT TO DO For everything you need to know to experience the best of St.
    [Show full text]
  • St. Lawrence River at Massena Remedial Action Plan -Stage I- ·
    ST. LAWRENCE RIVER AT MASSENA REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN -STAGE I- · November, 1990 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation MARIO M. CUOMO, Governor THOMAS C. JORLING, Commissioner ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This document was prepared by New York State Department of Environmental Conservation staff under the coordination of the Great Lakes Section, Division of Water. Contributors to the report and the development of the Remedial Action Plan include: Region 6, Watertown: Berton Mead, Charles 0. Nevin Region 6, Utica: James Luz Central Office, Albany: Bureau of Information & Human Resources Ray Faught, Jill Savage, Al Tedrow Great Lakes Section Robert Collin, Thomas Cullen, Richard Draper, Gerald Miko~ Virginia Romanzo Public Participation Section Cynthia Brown, Sue Collamer, Theresa Monaghan, Lois New The NYSDEC would like to acknowledge the valuable contributions of the Massena Citizen Advisory Committee, its subcommittees, and other interested members of the public who helped develop the Massena RAP. TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments .................................................. i. Table of contents . u. List of Tables .................................................... iii. List of Figures . v. Steering Committee Members . VI. Citizen Advisory Committee Members .................................. vii. Technical Subcommittee Members .................................... xi. Public Outreach Subcommittee Members ............................... xu. Chapter I. Introduction . 1-1 - 1-4 II. Setting ........................................ II-1 - II-19 III. Goals and Planning ............................. III-1 - III-10 IV. Use Impairments and Their Causes ................. IV-1 - IV-38 V. Sources of Pollutants Causing Impairments ............ V-1 - V-44 VI. Public Participation .............................. VI-1 - VI-6 VII. Mohawk Community of Akwesasne . VII-1 - VIl-18 Appendix A. Massena AOC Fish Tissue Contaminant Levels. Appendix B. Massena AOC Industrial Facilities and Inactive Hazardous Waste Site Descriptions. Appendix C.
    [Show full text]