Final Copy 2020 01 23 Kenn

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Final Copy 2020 01 23 Kenn This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from Explore Bristol Research, http://research-information.bristol.ac.uk Author: Kennedy, Clare L Title: An investigation into the genomic actions of glucocorticoid binding receptors in the rat brain following acute stress and circadian influences General rights Access to the thesis is subject to the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International Public License. A copy of this may be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode This license sets out your rights and the restrictions that apply to your access to the thesis so it is important you read this before proceeding. Take down policy Some pages of this thesis may have been removed for copyright restrictions prior to having it been deposited in Explore Bristol Research. However, if you have discovered material within the thesis that you consider to be unlawful e.g. breaches of copyright (either yours or that of a third party) or any other law, including but not limited to those relating to patent, trademark, confidentiality, data protection, obscenity, defamation, libel, then please contact [email protected] and include the following information in your message: •Your contact details •Bibliographic details for the item, including a URL •An outline nature of the complaint Your claim will be investigated and, where appropriate, the item in question will be removed from public view as soon as possible. An investigation into the genomic actions of glucocorticoid binding receptors in the rat brain following acute stress and circadian influences Clare Linda Kennedy A thesis submitted to the University of Bristol in accordance with the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School September 2019 Word Count: 63, 581 Abstract Glucocorticoid (GC) hormones secreted upon activation of the HPA axis following stress or circadian input are vital regulators of many important physiological processes. In the brain, genomically acting mineralocorticoid receptors (MRs) and glucocorticoid receptor (GRs), orchestrate the cellular and molecular effects of GCs. Upon receptor occupancy, MRs and GRs translocate to the nucleus where they bind the DNA to transactivate or transrepress GC-target gene expression. Here, we conducted hippocampal ChIP- and RNA-seq to investigate the genome-wide binding of MRs and GRs and the transcriptomic response following elevations in corticosterone, the primary GC in the rat, in response to an acute stressor (Forced swimming – FS) or the circadian rise of GC secretion. ChIP-seq revealed a strikingly distinct profile of MR- and/or GR-binding to over 1,000 loci, while RNA-seq identified transcriptional responses in over 1,000 genes. Cross-correlation of both datasets was carried out for the first time, while extensive pathway analysis highlighted many promising novel targets for further exploration. Of these targets, we further investigated the Krüppel-like factors (KLFs) in a separate cohort of rats while validating findings of ChIP- and RNA-seq. We extended our examination to other brain regions such as the amygdala, PFC and neocortex which showed substantial MR DNA-binding in these regions despite previous reports describing a localised expression of this receptor primarily in the hippocampus. Subsequently, we investigated whether the increases in binding were in fact the underlying events responsible for the observed transcriptional responses by blocking the actions of genomically acting MRs and GRs, using receptor antagonists, inhibitors of corticosterone synthesis and surgical adrenalectomy. This thesis has provided novel insights into the genomic actions of MRs and GRs under physiological conditions of relevance for GC secretion, while providing the groundwork for future experiments aiming to elucidate further the genomic mechanisms underlying GC hormone action in the brain. i Acknowledgements First and foremost, I would like to thank my supervisor, Professor Hans Reul, for the opportunity to carry out my PhD in his research group, and for his guidance, support and input throughout these 4 years. I am incredibly grateful to the Wellcome Trust and BBSRC; who have provided the funding to support my work. I would like to thank our collaborators at the Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, Oxford; especially Silvia. I would like to thank all past and present members of the Reul group. Karen; I could never thank you enough for being my unofficial second supervisor, counsellor and general life saver. Thank you for offering me so much support and guidance and being a fantastic colleague and friend. Emily; these past few years would not have been half as enjoyable without you there to make me laugh. Thank you for always listening to me vent and for proofreading my thesis with your eagle eye. I am going to miss dancing around the lab to Radio1 together and being the victim of your sarcasm! I would also like to thank my lovely colleagues at the Dorothy Hodgkin Building. Dagmara and Paul; without you both, we would all be lost! Astrid, thank you for your kindness and encouragement. Ben, Matt and George, our Friday pub trips, and general excursions have kept me sane; we make a truly fantastic clique. Mom and Dad, thank supporting me throughout this PhD and in my next academic adventure (Bioemphemetics is a far better spelling). Fred, my winning ticket, thank you for everything. ii Author’s Declaration I declare that the work in this thesis was carried out in accordance with the requirements of the University’s Regulations and Code of Practice for Research Degree Programmes and that it has not been submitted for any other academic award. Except where indicated by specific reference in the text, the work is the candidate’s own work. Work done in collaboration with, or with the assistance of, others, is indicated as such. Any views expressed in the dissertation are those of the author. SIGNED:……………………………………………………………..DATE:…………………………. iii Abbreviations 3C Chromatin conformation capture 6-FAM 6-Carboxyfluorescein A Adenine Aβ Amyloid-beta ACTH Adrenocorticotropic hormone ACTHR ACTH receptor ADX Adrenalectomy AEBSF 4-(2-Aminoethyl) benzenesulfonyl fluoride hydrochloride AF-1 Activation function-1 AF-2 Activation function-2 AmPFC Anterior mPFC AP1 Activation protein 1 ASM Airway smooth muscle ATOH1 Atonal BHLH Transcription Factor AVP Arginine vasopressin Bace1 Beta-Secretase 1 BAFs BRM/BRG1 associated factors BBB Blood-brain barrier Bdnf Brain-derived neurotrophic factor BLA Basolateral nucleus of the amygdala BLAM Baseline a.m. BLPM Baseline p.m. Bmal1 Brain and Muscle ARNT-Like 1 BOLD Blood oxygenation level dependent Bps Base pairs BRM Brahma BRG1 Brahma-related gene 1 iv BTEB Basic transcription element-binding protein C Cytosine CA Cornu ammonis cAMP Cyclic adenosine mono phosphate CBG Corticosteroid-binding globulin CBP CREB binding protein CCK Cholecystokinin CE Circadian exclusive CeA Central nucleus of the amygdala CFL1 Cofilin 1 ChIP Chromatin immunoprecipitation ChIP-seq ChIP-sequencing CLOCK Clock circadian regulator CNS Central nervous system CON Constitutive CORT Corticosterone CREB cAMP response element binding protein CRH Corticotropin-releasing hormone CRX Con-Rod Homeobox CRY Cryptochrome circadian regulator CRY2 Cryptochrome circadian regulator 2 CSF Cerebrospinal fluid CYP Cytochrome P450 family CyPA Cyclophilin A DAVID Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery DBD DNA-binding domain DEX Dexamethasone DG Dentate gyrus v Disc1 Disrupted-in-schizophrenia 1 DHEA Dehydroepiandrosterone DHEAS Dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate ester DOC 11-deoxycorticosterone Dlx2 Distal-Less Homeobox 2 DNA Deoxyribonucleic acid dNTP deoxyribonucleotide triphosphate DST Dexamethasone suppression test EC Endothelial cell EDTA Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid EGR Early growth response EMAS Electrophoretic mobility shift assay Erbb4 Erb-B2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinase 4 ERK Extracellular regulated kinase ERK1/2 Extracellular regulated kinase ½ ESR Estrogen Receptor EWSR1-FLI1 EWS RNA Binding Protein 1-Fli-1 Proto-Oncogene, ETS transcription factor exRNA exonic RNA FAIRE Formaldehyde assisted isolation of regulatory elements FDR False discovery rate Fkbp4 FK506 binding protein 52 Fkbp5 FK506 binding protein 51 fMRI Functional magnetic resonance imaging Fos Fos Proto-Oncogene AP-1 Transcription Factor Subunit FOX Forkhead box FOXO3A Forkhead box O3A FS Forced swimming G Guanine vi GC Glucocorticoid GABA Gamma aminobutyric acid GABAA Gamma aminobutyric acid subunit A GAD Glutamic acid decarboxylase GAD65 Glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 GAD67 Glutamic acid decarboxylase 67 Gapdh Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase GFAP Glial fibrillary acidic protein GO Gene Ontology GR Glucocorticoid receptor GRox Glucocorticoid receptor over-expressing GRE Glucocorticoid response element GRIA2 Glutamate ionotropic receptor AMPA type subunit 2 GRIN1 Glutamate ionotropic receptor NMDA type subunit 1 GRIN2B Glutamate ionotropic receptor NMDA type subunit 2B H Histone HAT Histone acetyltransferase HBMEC Human brain microvascular endothelial cells HDAC Histone deacetylase hGR human GR hnRNA Heteronuclear RNA Homer3 Homer Scaffold Protein 3 HR Hinge region HSD3B Hydroxy-delta-5-steroid-dehydrogenase, 3-beta Hsp Heat shock protein HPA Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal Hprt1 Hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase 1 inRNA intronic RNA vii i.p. Intraperitoneal IPA Ingenuity pathway analysis K Lysine Kbs
Recommended publications
  • KLF6 Depletion Promotes NF-Κb Signaling in Glioblastoma
    OPEN Oncogene (2017) 36, 3562–3575 www.nature.com/onc ORIGINAL ARTICLE KLF6 depletion promotes NF-κB signaling in glioblastoma AP Masilamani1,2, R Ferrarese1,2, E Kling1,2, NK Thudi3, H Kim4, DM Scholtens5, F Dai1,2, M Hadler1,2, T Unterkircher1,2, L Platania1,2, A Weyerbrock1,2, M Prinz6,7, GY Gillespie8, GR Harsh IV9, M Bredel3,10 and MS Carro1,2,10 Dysregulation of the NF-κB transcription factor occurs in many cancer types. Krüppel-like family of transcription factors (KLFs) regulate the expression of genes involved in cell proliferation, differentiation and survival. Here, we report a new mechanism of NF- κB activation in glioblastoma through depletion of the KLF6 tumor suppressor. We show that KLF6 transactivates multiple genes negatively controlling the NF-κB pathway and consequently reduces NF-κB nuclear localization and downregulates NF-κB targets. Reconstitution of KLF6 attenuates their malignant phenotype and induces neural-like differentiation and senescence, consistent with NF-κB pathway inhibition. KLF6 is heterozygously deleted in 74.5% of the analyzed glioblastomas and predicts unfavorable patient prognosis suggesting that haploinsufficiency is a clinically relevant means of evading KLF6-dependent regulation of NF-κB. Together, our study identifies a new mechanism by which KLF6 regulates NF-κB signaling, and how this mechanism is circumvented in glioblastoma through KLF6 loss. Oncogene (2017) 36, 3562–3575; doi:10.1038/onc.2016.507; published online 6 February 2017 INTRODUCTION coding region have been controversial.16,18–22 KLF6 has been The NF-κB transcription factor family is oncogenic through proposed to perform its tumor suppression function by promoting suppression of programmed cell death, and promotion of tumor G1 cell cycle arrest mainly through cyclin-dependent kinase 15 growth and invasion.1 In tumors, NF-κB can be activated by inhibitor 1A (CDKN1A) promoter transactivation.
    [Show full text]
  • KLF6-SV1 Overexpression Accelerates Human and Mouse Prostate Cancer Progression and Metastasis
    KLF6-SV1 overexpression accelerates human and mouse prostate cancer progression and metastasis Goutham Narla, … , Mark A. Rubin, John A. Martignetti J Clin Invest. 2008;118(8):2711-2721. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI34780. Research Article Oncology Metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the leading causes of death from cancer in men. The molecular mechanisms underlying the transition from localized tumor to hormone-refractory metastatic PCa remain largely unknown, and their identification is key for predicting prognosis and targeted therapy. Here we demonstrated that increased expression of a splice variant of the Kruppel-like factor 6 (KLF6) tumor suppressor gene, known as KLF6-SV1, in tumors from men after prostatectomy predicted markedly poorer survival and disease recurrence profiles. Analysis of tumor samples revealed that KLF6-SV1 levels were specifically upregulated in hormone-refractory metastatic PCa. In 2 complementary mouse models of metastatic PCa, KLF6-SV1–overexpressing PCa cells were shown by in vivo and ex vivo bioluminescent imaging to metastasize more rapidly and to disseminate to lymph nodes, bone, and brain more often. Interestingly, while KLF6-SV1 overexpression increased metastasis, it did not affect localized tumor growth. KLF6-SV1 inhibition using RNAi induced spontaneous apoptosis in cultured PCa cell lines and suppressed tumor growth in mice. Together, these findings demonstrate that KLF6-SV1 expression levels in PCa tumors at the time of diagnosis can predict the metastatic behavior of the tumor; thus, KLF-SV1 may represent a novel therapeutic target. Find the latest version: https://jci.me/34780/pdf Research article KLF6-SV1 overexpression accelerates human and mouse prostate cancer progression and metastasis Goutham Narla,1,2 Analisa DiFeo,1 Yolanda Fernandez,1 Saravana Dhanasekaran,3 Fei Huang,1 Jaya Sangodkar,1,2 Eldad Hod,2 Devin Leake,4 Scott L.
    [Show full text]
  • Klf6 Is a Zinc Finger Protein Expressed in a Cell-Specific Manner During Kidney Development
    J Am Soc Nephrol 12: 726–735, 2001 Klf6 Is a Zinc Finger Protein Expressed in a Cell-Specific Manner during Kidney Development EVELYNE A. FISCHER,* MARIE-CHRISTINE VERPONT,* LEE ANN GARRETT-SINHA,† PIERRE M. RONCO,* and JEROME A. ROSSERT* *INSERM U 489 and University of Paris VI, AP-HP, Paris, France; and †The University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. Abstract. Molecular mechanisms that are responsible for the expressed in the Wolffian duct but not in the mesonephric development of the renal collecting duct system during embry- mesenchyme. Thereafter, Klf6 was expressed in the ureteric ogenesis are still poorly understood. A mouse cDNA encoding bud and its branches and in the collecting ducts, whereas it was a zinc finger protein, called Klf6, which is a member of the not expressed in tubular structures that derive from the meta- Kru¨ppel-like family of transcription factors, has been cloned. nephric mesenchyme. Glomeruli were not labeled during early Northern blot analyses showed that Klf6 was already expressed stages of differentiation, and it is only at the capillary stage that in 11.5-d postconception mouse embryos and that its expres- a staining of the mesangial area was observed, which persisted sion persisted after birth. They also disclosed that Klf6 had a after birth. This pattern of expression is strikingly similar to the restricted pattern of expression. In situ hybridization experi- one of GATA-3, which is another zinc finger protein. It sug- ments using mouse embryos showed that during kidney devel- gests that Klf6 may play a role during kidney development and opment, Klf6 was expressed selectively in the Wolffian duct in particular during the development of the renal collecting and in its derivatives.
    [Show full text]
  • A Germline DNA Polymorphism Enhances Alternative Splicing of the KLF6 Tumor Suppressor Gene and Is Associated with Increased Prostate Cancer Risk
    Research Article A Germline DNA Polymorphism Enhances Alternative Splicing of the KLF6 Tumor Suppressor Gene and Is Associated with Increased Prostate Cancer Risk Goutham Narla,1 Analisa DiFeo,2 Helen L. Reeves,1 Daniel J. Schaid,3 Jennifer Hirshfeld,2 Eldad Hod,1 Amanda Katz,1 William B. Isaacs,5 Scott Hebbring,4 Akira Komiya,5 Shannon K. McDonnell,3 Kathleen E. Wiley,5 Steven J. Jacobsen,3 Sarah D. Isaacs,5 Patrick C. Walsh,5 S. Lilly Zheng,10 Bao-Li Chang,10 Danielle M. Friedrichsen,6 Janet L. Stanford,7 Elaine A. Ostrander,6 Arul M. Chinnaiyan,8 Mark A. Rubin,9 Jianfeng Xu,10 Stephen N. Thibodeau,4 Scott L. Friedman,1 and John A. Martignetti2 Departments of 1Medicine and 2Human Genetics, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York; 3Departments of Health Sciences Research and 4Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota; 5Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Medical Institution, Baltimore, Maryland; 6Divisions of Clinical Human Biology and 7Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington; 8Department of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan; 9Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; and 10Center for Human Genomics, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina Abstract identifying the molecular pathways involved in other major cancers Prostate cancer is a leading and increasingly prevalent cause (2, 3), few candidate prostate cancer–associated genes have of cancer death in men. Whereas family history of disease is emerged (4). One approach to identify prostate cancer genes has one of the strongest prostate cancer risk factors and suggests focused on the use of linkage studies in hereditary prostate cancer a hereditary component, the predisposing genetic factors families.
    [Show full text]
  • Discovery of Biased Orientation of Human DNA Motif Sequences
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/290825; this version posted January 27, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 1 Discovery of biased orientation of human DNA motif sequences 2 affecting enhancer-promoter interactions and transcription of genes 3 4 Naoki Osato1* 5 6 1Department of Bioinformatic Engineering, Graduate School of Information Science 7 and Technology, Osaka University, Osaka 565-0871, Japan 8 *Corresponding author 9 E-mail address: [email protected], [email protected] 10 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/290825; this version posted January 27, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 11 Abstract 12 Chromatin interactions have important roles for enhancer-promoter interactions 13 (EPI) and regulating the transcription of genes. CTCF and cohesin proteins are located 14 at the anchors of chromatin interactions, forming their loop structures. CTCF has 15 insulator function limiting the activity of enhancers into the loops. DNA binding 16 sequences of CTCF indicate their orientation bias at chromatin interaction anchors – 17 forward-reverse (FR) orientation is frequently observed. DNA binding sequences of 18 CTCF were found in open chromatin regions at about 40% - 80% of chromatin 19 interaction anchors in Hi-C and in situ Hi-C experimental data.
    [Show full text]
  • In Vivo Regulation of P21 by the Kruppel-Like Factor 6 Tumor-Suppressor Gene in Mouse Liver and Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Oncogene (2007) 26, 4428–4434 & 2007 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0950-9232/07 $30.00 www.nature.com/onc SHORT COMMUNICATION In vivo regulation of p21 by the Kruppel-like factor 6 tumor-suppressor gene in mouse liver and human hepatocellular carcinoma G Narla1,2,3,4,7, S Kremer-Tal1,3,7, N Matsumoto1,3, X Zhao1,3, S Yao5, K Kelley6, M Tarocchi1,3 and SL Friedman1,3 1Department of Medicine, The Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; 2Department of Human Genetics, The Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; 3Division of Liver Diseases, The Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; 4Division of Hematology/Oncology, The Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; 5Department of Oncological Sciences, The Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA and 6Brookdale Department of Molecular, Cell and Developmental Biology, The Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA Kruppel-like factor (KLF) 6 is a tumor-suppressor gene Kruppel-like factor 6 (KLF6) belongs to the Kruppel- functionally inactivated by loss of heterozygosity, somatic like family of transcription factors, which play roles in mutation and/or alternative splicing that generates a the regulationof diverse cellular processes including dominant-negative splice form, KLF6-SV1. Wild-type development, differentiation, proliferation and apopto- KLF6 (wtKLF6) expression is decreased in many human sis (Bieker, 2001). Functional inactivation of the KLF6 malignancies, which correlates with reduced patient gene occurs through several mechanisms, including loss survival. Additionally, loss of the KLF6 locus in the of heterozygosity (LOH), somatic mutationand/or absence of somatic mutation in the remaining allele occurs increased alternative splicing that yields a dominant- in a number of human cancers, raising the possibility that negative splice isoform, KLF6-SV1.
    [Show full text]
  • A Module of Negative Feedback Regulators Defines Growth Factor
    ARTICLES A module of negative feedback regulators defines growth factor signaling Ido Amit1,9, Ami Citri1,8,9, Tal Shay2, Yiling Lu3, Menachem Katz1, Fan Zhang3, Gabi Tarcic1, Doris Siwak3, John Lahad3, Jasmine Jacob-Hirsch4, Ninette Amariglio4, Nora Vaisman5, Eran Segal6, Gideon Rechavi4, Uri Alon7, Gordon B Mills3, Eytan Domany2 & Yosef Yarden1 Signaling pathways invoke interplays between forward signaling and feedback to drive robust cellular response. In this study, we address the dynamics of growth factor signaling through profiling of protein phosphorylation and gene expression, demonstrating the presence of a kinetically defined cluster of delayed early genes that function to attenuate the early events of growth factor signaling. Using epidermal growth factor receptor signaling as the major model system and concentrating on regulation of transcription and mRNA stability, we demonstrate that a number of genes within the delayed early gene cluster function as feedback regulators of immediate early genes. Consistent with their role in negative regulation of cell signaling, genes within http://www.nature.com/naturegenetics this cluster are downregulated in diverse tumor types, in correlation with clinical outcome. More generally, our study proposes a mechanistic description of the cellular response to growth factors by defining architectural motifs that underlie the function of signaling networks. Cells respond in a stereotypic and highly reproducible manner to phosphorylation and gene expression, with the aim of uncovering external stimuli. A major focus of current research is elucidation of the mechanisms of transcription-dependent signal attenuation. Conse- mechanisms underlying the regulation of this response. In the past, quently, we can now identify a cluster of coexpressed genes that considerable effort was invested in characterizing ‘forward-signaling’ function in feedback attenuation of growth factor signaling at specific components activated by external stimuli, with successful identifica- nodes within the network (for an overview, see Supplementary Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Glucocorticoid Receptor and Klf4 Co-Regulate Anti-Inflammatory Genes in Keratinocytes
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Digital.CSIC Glucocorticoid receptor and Klf4 co-regulate anti-inflammatory genes in keratinocytes Lisa M. Sevilla1, Víctor Latorre1,2, Elena Carceller1, Julia Boix1, Daniel Vodák3, Ian Geoffrey Mills4, 5, 6, and Paloma Pérez1 1 Instituto de Biomedicina de Valencia-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (IBV- CSIC), Jaime Roig 11, E-46010 Valencia, Spain. 2 Faculty of Human and Medical Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester UK 3 Bioinformatics Core Facility, Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Norway 4 Prostate Cancer Research Group, Centre for Molecular Medicine (Norway), University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospitals, Oslo, Norway 5 Department of Cancer Prevention, Oslo University Hospitals, Oslo, Norway. 6 Department of Urology, Oslo University Hospitals, Oslo, Norway. Corresponding autor and person to whom reprint requests should be addressed: Paloma Pérez, PhD Instituto de Biomedicina de Valencia-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (IBV- CSIC) Jaime Roig 11, E-46010, Valencia, Spain Phone: +34-96-339-1766 Fax: +34-96-369-0800 e-mail: [email protected] Grants and fellowships supporting the writing of paper: SAF2011-28115 of the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad from the Spanish government. EC and JB are recipients of FPU and FPI fellowships of the Spanish Ministery, respectively Disclosure Statement: The authors have nothing to disclose. Abstract The glucocorticoid (GC) receptor (GR) and Kruppel-like factor Klf4 are transcription factors that play major roles in the skin homeostasis by regulating the expression of overlapping gene subsets.
    [Show full text]
  • Activating Transcription Factor 3 (ATF3) Promotes Sublytic C5b-9-Induced
    G Model IMBIO-50689; No. of Pages 11 ARTICLE IN PRESS Immunobiology xxx (2011) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Immunobiology journal homepage: www.elsevier.de/imbio Activating transcription factor 3 (ATF3) promotes sublytic C5b-9-induced glomerular mesangial cells apoptosis through up-regulation of Gadd45␣ and KLF6 gene expression Kuanfeng Xu, Ying Zhou, Wen Qiu, Xin Liu, Mei Xia, Lisha Liu, Xiaomei Liu, Dan Zhao, Yingwei Wang ∗ Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Nanjing Medical University, 140 Nanjing Hanzhong Road, Nanjing, PR China article info abstract Article history: The sublytic C5b-9 complexes can result in glomerular mesangial cells (GMCs) apoptosis, which involved Received 29 November 2010 in the initiation and development of rat Thy-1 nephritis. Activating transcription factor 3 (ATF3) is an Received in revised form 13 January 2011 immediate early gene for cells to cope with a variety of stress signals, and our previous study revealed that Accepted 15 February 2011 ATF3 could promote GMCs apoptosis attacked by sublytic C5b-9. But the mechanism of ATF3 promoting GMCs apoptosis triggered by sublytic C5b-9 attack has not been elucidated. In this study, the data showed Keywords: that the expression of ATF3, growth arrest and DNA damage-45 alpha (Gadd45␣), Krüppel-like factor 6 Sublytic C5b-9 (KLF6) and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) in the GMCs in response to sublytic C5b-9 stimulation ATF3 Gadd45␣ for the indicated time was significantly increased, and ATF3 expression could lead to GMCs apoptosis ␣ ␣ KLF6 through up-regulation of Gadd45 and KLF6, but not up-regulation of PCNA. Furthermore, Gadd45 was PCNA identified as a downstream target gene regulated by ATF3 directly, and KLF6 might be regulated by ATF3 in an indirect manner.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF-Document
    Supplementary Material Investigating the role of microRNA and Transcription Factor co-regulatory networks in Multiple Sclerosis pathogenesis Nicoletta Nuzziello1, Laura Vilardo2, Paride Pelucchi2, Arianna Consiglio1, Sabino Liuni1, Maria Trojano3 and Maria Liguori1* 1National Research Council, Institute of Biomedical Technologies, Bari Unit, Bari, Italy 2National Research Council, Institute of Biomedical Technologies, Segrate Unit, Milan, Italy 3Department of Basic Sciences, Neurosciences and Sense Organs, University of Bari, Bari, Italy Supplementary Figure S1 Frequencies of GO terms and canonical pathways. (a) Histogram illustrates the GO terms associated to assembled sub-networks. (b) Histogram illustrates the canonical pathways associated to assembled sub-network. a b Legends for Supplementary Tables Supplementary Table S1 List of feedback (FBL) and feed-forward (FFL) loops in miRNA-TF co-regulatory network. Supplementary Table S2 List of significantly (adj p-value < 0.05) GO-term involved in MS. The first column (from the left) listed the GO-term (biological processes) involved in MS. For each functional class, the main attributes (gene count, p-value, adjusted p-value of the enriched terms for multiple testing using the Benjamini correction) have been detailed. In the last column (on the right), we summarized the target genes involved in each enriched GO-term. Supplementary Table S3 List of significantly (adj p-value < 0.05) enriched pathway involved in MS. The first column (from the left) listed the enriched pathway involved in MS. For each pathway, the main attributes (gene count, p-value, adjusted p-value of the enriched terms for multiple testing using the Benjamini correction) have been detailed. In the last column (on the right), we summarized the target genes involved in each enriched pathway.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterising Mechanisms of Aberrant Mutant Androgen Receptor Signalling in Advanced Prostate Cancer
    Characterising mechanisms of aberrant mutant androgen receptor signalling in advanced prostate cancer Wenrui Guo 120444241 Supervisors: Dr. Luke Gaughan Prof. Craig Robson Surgical Oncology Research Group Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle. September 2018 1 Abstract Prostate cancer (PC) is the most commonly diagnosed disease in the UK which causes approximately 10,000 deaths annually. Although an initially effective response to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) occurs in most patients, the tumour normally recurs in a more aggressive form of the disease termed castrate resistant PC (CRPC) and is largely untreatable at this stage. In many cases, disease is driven by inappropriate androgen receptor (AR) signalling. It is therefore vital to have better understanding of mechanisms that re-activate AR and promote ADT resistance in the clinic and hence better treatments for advanced tumour. Activation of AR by testosterone is crucial for prostate growth and transformation. Anti- androgens, the second most common PC therapy after surgery, antagonise ligand binding to the receptor and hence deactivate AR signalling. In 2012, enzalutamide, a more potent agents in terms of availability to block AR was approved by the FDA and ENA as a second-generation anti- androgen for clinical usage. Although it demonstrated several advantages over its pervious counterpart bicalutamide, response rates of just 50% in CRPC patients and subsequent resistance observed in responders has limited its effectiveness. Critically, several lines of evidence from pre- clinical models and patient samples indicate that one particular resistant mechanism is the emergence of AR mutant(s), in part, driven by a specific AR mutation F876L that enables the compound to act as an agonist.
    [Show full text]
  • KLF6 Suppresses Metastasis of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Via
    Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on October 25, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0348 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. KLF6 suppresses metastasis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma via transcriptional repression of E2F1 Yu Gao 1,2#, Hongzhao Li1,2#, Xin Ma1,2#, Yang Fan1,2, Dong Ni1,2, Yu Zhang1,2, Qingbo Huang1,2,Kan Liu1,2 , Xintao Li1,2 , Lei Wang1,2 , Liangyou Gu1,2 ,Yuanxin Yao1,2 , Qing Ai1,2 , Qingshan Du1,2 , Erlin Song3 and Xu Zhang1,2* 1. Department of Urology, Chinese PLA General Hospital/ Chinese PLA Medical School, Beijing, 100853, P. R. China 2. State Key Laboratory of Kidney Diseases, Chinese PLA General Hospital/ Chinese PLA Medical School, Beijing, 100853, P. R. China 3. Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China. # All authors contributed equally to this paper. *Corresponding author at: Department of Urology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, 28, Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100853, People’s Republic of China Tel: 86-10-66938008; Fax: 86-10-68223575 E-mail address: [email protected] (Xu Zhang) Running title: KLF6 transcriptionally represses E2F1 in ccRCC metastasis Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed. Grant Support This work was financially supported by National Nature Science Foundation (No. 81572878 1 Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 23, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on October 25, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0348 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
    [Show full text]