DOCSLIB.ORG

What Will Happen to God? Part 11 GERALD BRAY

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

What will happen to God? Part 11 GERALD BRAY This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased These are famous words attributed to the Father, who, as the Synoptic Gospels record, pronounced them at the moment when the Holy Spirit descended on Jesus immediately after his baptism. The event is also recorded in the Fourth Gospel, but there we are told only that John the Baptist bore witness to the fact that Jesus was the Son of God. John's relative reticence is an argument in favour of granting him priority over the Synoptic account because it is so much less expansive on the subject of these extraordinary happenings. At the same time, John's account confirms that there is an important link between the Baptism of Jesus and the revelation that he is the Son of God. Students of early Church history may recall that Paul of Samosata was condemned at a Synod of Antioch in 268, apparently because he believed that the Baptism of Jesus was the point at which God adopted Jesus of Nazareth as his Son. The descent of the Holy Spirit, according to Paul's interpretation, was the seal which God put on this new relationship into which Jesus had entered. It is not difficult, of course, to see why Paul of Samosata should have fallen into this particular error. Paul was a firm believer in baptismal regeneration, and it seemed to him to be only logical that Jesus' baptism should have the same effect on him as it does on us. Jesus was therefore a man like us who acquired eternal life in the same way we do, by baptism. His uniqueness lay only in the fact that as a man he had never sinned, and therefore had earned the special grace which God had bestowed on him, whereas we are dependent on his mercy for forgiveness. Empowered by this grace, Jesus was able to live the kind of life and die the kind of death which would attract many more sons to glory, as they sought to experience the same grace of adoption which was first revealed in Jesus. It would not really be worth mentioning this rather strange heresy were it not for the fact that a curious version of it survives, and even flourishes, in academic circles today. Very numerovs are the scholars, theologians and bishops who believe that the uniqueness of Christ consists mainly of the fact that he introduced mankind to a new type of religious understanding and experience. Usually this belief is coupled with the statement that Jesus himself drew nearer to God than any man before him or since, though Dennis Nineham, writing 22 What will happen to God? Part II in the Epilogue to that once-notorious symposium, The Myth of God Incarnate, at least had the honesty to say that this assertion did not follow logically from the former, and might still not be true. As he pointed out, there were many things about the teaching of Jesus-his views on hell, for example-which his heavenly Father could not have been well-pleased about, and we may legitimately wonder whether Jesus' rather cramped moral vision has not been superseded by quite ordinary people-Dennis Nineham, for example-in our own time. This modern form of adoptionism which, if pressed to its logical conclusion, would dissolve historical Christianity into contemporary spirituality, and remove the few remaining links between the Person of Jesus Christ and the modern Church, is a danger far greater than anything ever imagined by the likes of Paul of Samosata. We must combat it at the most fundamental level if we hope to survive as a witnessing community of believers in our modern world. How can we do this? We ought, I think, to begin with the Gospel account of the Baptism of Jesus, even though modern adoptionism ·has generally abandoned this starting-point in favour of the so-called 'Easter event'. According to the Fourth Gospel, when John the Baptist saw Jesus coming, he cried out: 'Behold the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world'. This verse, which may be familiar in what seems to be a more appropriate, but which is in fact a less Biblical, sacramental context, makes a very clear statement about who Jesus is in relation to the rite of Baptism. It is my belief that the sacraments are intended as a means of preaching the Gospel. This belief of mine, is remarkably borne out in this verse, because John recognises immediately that his baptism is inapplicable to Jesus; indeed, he realises that the shoe, which he is unworthy to unloose, is really on the other foot-he is the one who ought to be receiving baptism from Jesus, not the other way round. The Fourth Gospel is so reticent at this point that it does not even say that John baptized Jesus; for this we must turn to the Synoptic Gospels which mention the same details, more or less, and also stress John's unwillingness to baptize the Son of God. Jesus, as Matthew records the event (3: 15), agreed with John's estimate of the situation but pressed him for baptism in order that he might be seen to fulfil all righteousness. Since there was no righteousness for Jesus himself to fulfil, this must be a reference to his atoning work as the Lamb of God, who became sin for us that we might be set free from all sin. The Baptism of Jesus is therefore both the beginning and the summary of his teaching message-that he had become a man on earth in order that we might be set free to reign with him in heaven. Moreover, by this act, Jesus revealed the meaning of John's baptism for repentance, which would find its fulfilment in the baptism 23 Churchman of blood at Calvary. We are now in a pos1t10n to understand, I think, that the extraordinary events which followed the Baptism of Jesus cannot be dissociated from the unique conditions which preceded it-indeed, which would have prevented it, had Jesus not intervened. It was precisely when Jesus demonstrated by this act who he really was and what he had come to do that the heavens were opened and the barrier separating earth from heaven was visibly and audibly penetrated. That the result should be the descent of the Holy Spirit in the form of the dove of pure sacrifice and by the voice of the invisible Father is only to be expected, because where the Atonement is preached, there the Trinity is also revealed. The Atonement is after all, a work of the Son of God inside the trinitarian Godhead; it is a sacrifice presented-to the Father, the effects of which are then brought to us by the descent of the Holy Spirit at Pentecost-no longer the spotless dove, but tongues of fire to cleanse and renew the spirit of each believer. In the baptism of Jesus then, we are given a foretaste of the glory of heaven-we are given, in short, a revelation of God. From what the Gospels record, it must therefore be obvious that the Baptism of Jesus was in no sense the adoption of man into the Godhead, nor did it make the slightest difference to the relationship which the Son already enjoyed with his Father. The voice from heaven was not establishing the Sonship of Christ, but merely revealing it to the world, and confirming that the pattern of Incarnation was the one the Father had approved for the fulfilment of his plan. For although the Baptism of Jesus is tied to the fact that he is Son of God, we must never forget that it was in the human nature which he had assumed that this Son of God was baptized and commended by the Father. There is another ancient heresy, also called adoptionism, but associated with Elipandus of Toledo, an eighth-century Spanish bishop and his colleague Felix of Urgel who wanted to argue that though Christ was Son of God in his divine nature, he was only an adopted son in his human nature, a belief which effectively reduced the latter to an optional extra. No doubt Elipandus and Felix, as mediaeval male chauvinists, would have been shocked to see the female Christ crucified which was recently on display in the Episcopalian cathedral in New York, but in principle there is no reason why they should have been. Indeed, the idea of a female Christ is very prominent in mediaeval mystical literature, a genre which reflects a type of experience in which the physical world was most devalued. Elipandus and Felix were propounding a doctrine which ultimately denied the historicity of the Incarnation because it divided the unity of the Person of Christ manifested in his two natures. Once that happened, once it was claimed that the term 'Son of God' did not 24 What will happen to God? Part II really apply to the humanity of Jesus-or applied only in the sense in which it applies to us-the way was opened for the spread of a purely mystical, non-historical religion. That is precisely what happened! Today, we are familiar with this same process which we see developing all around us. Having demythologised the God-out-there, we are now remythologising the man-down-here. Nor should we be surprised that the remythologisation involves a considerable dose of the feminine. For having disposed of the agent of creation, who is the cosmic Christ of Colossians I: 16-17, we are driven inexorably towards the agent of procreation, and Christ becomes a woman as he did in mediaeval mysticism.
Recommended publications
  • The Arian Controversy, Its Ramifications and Lessons for the Ghanaian Church

    The Arian Controversy, Its Ramifications and Lessons for the Ghanaian Church

    International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention ISSN (Online): 2319 – 7722, ISSN (Print): 2319 – 7714 www.ijhssi.org Volume 2 Issue 11ǁ November. 2013ǁ PP.48-54 The Arian Controversy, its Ramifications and Lessons for the Ghanaian Church IDDRISSU ADAM SHAIBU Department of Religion & Human Values, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast-Ghana ABSTRACT: The thrust of this paper is to explore the Arian controversy, the ramifications of decisions taken by the various councils on the body of Jesus Christ and the possible lessons that the Ghanaian Church can learn from these ramifications. This was done by reviewing literature on the Arian controversy. It came out that Arianism was condemned at the council of Nicaea. However, this did not end the controversy due to the inclusion of a word that was deemed unbiblical and the interferences of some Roman Emperors.The paper concludes that it is advisable that the church ought to have the capacity to deal with her internal problems without the support of a third party, especially those without any theological insight to issues of the Church. It seldom leads to cribbing, leads to negativity, breeds tension and sometimes fighting/civil war which then lead to destruction of lives and properties. I. THE GREACO-ROMAN WORLD Although, Christianity emerged in the Roman world, it matured in the world of Greek philosophy and ideas. The Greek world was one that paid much respect to philosophical sophistication. The Early Church was thus permeated and penetrated by this philosophical sophistication (Hellenism) (Weaver, 1987). The religion in its earliest form can be said to be a hellenistic movement that attracted hellenised people from different ethnic groups.
  • Gerald Bray, "What Will Happen to God? {Part II)," Churchman 101.1

    Gerald Bray, "What Will Happen to God? {Part II)," Churchman 101.1

    What will happen to God? Part II GERALD BRAY This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased These are famous words attributed to the Father, who, as the Synoptic Gospels record, pronounced them at the moment when the Holy Spirit descended on Jesus immediately after his baptism. The event is also recorded in the Fourth Gospel, but there we are told only that John the Baptist bore witness to the fact that Jesus was the Son of God. John's relative reticence is an argument in favour of granting him priority over the Synoptic account because it is so much less expansive on the subject of these extraordinary happenings. At the same time, John's account confirms that there is an important link between the Baptism of Jesus and the revelation that he is the Son of God. Students of early Church history may recall that Paul of Samosata was condemned at a Synod of Antioch in 268, apparently because he believed that the Baptism of Jesus was the point at which God adopted Jesus of Nazareth as his Son. The descent of the Holy Spirit, according to Paul's interpretation, was the seal which God put on this new relationship into which Jesus had entered. It is not difficult, of course, to see why Paul of Samosata should have fallen into this particular error. Paul was a firm believer in baptismal regeneration, and it seemed to him to be only logical that Jesus' baptism should have the same effect on him as it does on us.
  • Antioch Ian Legacy for Today I

    Antioch Ian Legacy for Today I

    ANTIOCHANTIOCH IANIAN LEGACYLEGACY FORFOR TODAYTODAY II Fr.Fr. MichelMichel NajimNajim www.Frmichel.najim.netwww.Frmichel.najim.net COURSECOURSE DESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTION •• YEARYEAR ONE:ONE: SeeSee ofof Antioch.Antioch. TheThe importanceimportance ofof AntiochianAntiochian historyhistory andand legacy.legacy. AntiochAntioch duringduring thethe GrecoGreco--RomanRoman period.period. EarlyEarly AntiochianAntiochian Councils.Councils. AntiochAntioch andand thethe EcumenicalEcumenical Councils.Councils. EarlyEarly AntiochianAntiochian writers:writers: GreekGreek literature,literature, SyriacSyriac literature.literature. AntiochianAntiochian LiturgicalLiturgical tradition.tradition. AntiochainAntiochain Monasticism.Monasticism. MissionaryMissionary rolerole ofof Antioch.Antioch. TheThe ChaliceChalice ofof AntiochAntioch TheThe OldestOldest LiturgicalLiturgical ChaliceChalice •• ThisThis chalicechalice waswas foundfound inin 19101910 nearnear Antioch.Antioch. ItIt goesgoes toto 2th2th centurycentury AD.AD. ItIt isis 77 1/21/2 inchesinches (19(19 cm)cm) high.high. TheThe innerinner cupcup isis mademade ofof plainplain silver,silver, andand thethe outerouter cupcup isis silversilver gilded.gilded. ThisThis cupcup isis decorateddecorated withwith 1212 figuresfigures twotwo representrepresent Christ,Christ, thethe othersothers representrepresent thethe EvangelistsEvangelists andand thethe Apostles.Apostles. ChristChrist thethe SaviorSavior andand thethe YouthfulYouthful ChristChrist TheThe Apostles:Apostles: Andrew,Andrew, JamesJames thethe Greater,Greater,
  • Introduction and Index

    Introduction and Index

    Th e Practical Christology of Philoxenos of Mabbug DAVID A. MICHELSON Preview - Copyrighted Material 1 1 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP, United Kingdom Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries © David A. Michelson 2014 Th e moral rights of the author have been asserted First Edition published in 2014 Impression: 1 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above You must not circulate this work in any other form and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press 198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available Library of Congress Control Number: 2014940446 ISBN 978–0–19–872296–0 Printed and bound by CPI Group (UK) Ltd, Croydon, CR0 4YY Links to third party websites are provided by Oxford in good faith and for information only. Oxford disclaims any responsibility for the materials contained in any third party website referenced in this work.
  • CHAPTER 4 the CHURCH in the THIRD CENTURY Roman

    CHAPTER 4 the CHURCH in the THIRD CENTURY Roman

    The Early Church Christopher K. Lensch, S.T.M. Western Reformed Seminary (www.wrs.edu) CHAPTER 4 THE CHURCH IN THE THIRD CENTURY Roman emperors in the first half of the century Severi dynasty 1. Septimius Severus (193-211) [already discussed under second century] renewed persecution in AD 200: Leonidas (Origen’s father) beheaded Potamiaena (young girl) boiled in oil Petpetua and baby burned; her slave Felicitas killed also died on campaign in Britain 2. Caracalla (211-217) brutal and cruel; murdered family members, including brother Geta; favored the army; built baths; extended Roman citizenship to all, in order to tax all; dropped persecution in middle of reign; was assassinated by his army on a Parthian campaign 3. Macrinus (217-218) prefect of the guard; removed by Caracalla’s cousin and his family 4. Heliogabalus (218-222) cousin of Caracalla, controlled by his mother Soaemias and grandmother Maesa (Caracalla’s aunt); real name was Elagabalus; Latin authors name Heliogabalus 14-year old priest of Syrian sun god; brought Syrian “Baal” (conical black stone) to Rome; unbelievable sexual depravity; grandmother convinced him to adopt cousin Alexander; slain by Guard 5. Alexander Severus (222-235) 4.1 14 years old; well trained and prepared; ruled by mother; temperate and modest, opposite of Heliogabalus; private chapel icons: Jupiter, Orpheus, Apollonius, Abraham, Christ; *put golden rule in house and many public buildings; very efficient administrator, lowered taxes; weak against Germans, bribed them; assassinated in tent by army, under Maximinus Anarchy; army control 6. Maximinus (235-238) huge soldier (they say 8 feet tall); hated culture and education; never entered Rome; confiscated property of upper classes; murdered by soldiers he punished 7.
  • The Background and Meaning of the Image of the Beast in Rev. 13:14, 15

    The Background and Meaning of the Image of the Beast in Rev. 13:14, 15

    Andrews University Digital Commons @ Andrews University Dissertations Graduate Research 2016 The Background and Meaning of the Image of the Beast in Rev. 13:14, 15 Rebekah Yi Liu [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations Part of the Biblical Studies Commons Recommended Citation Liu, Rebekah Yi, "The Background and Meaning of the Image of the Beast in Rev. 13:14, 15" (2016). Dissertations. 1602. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations/1602 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Research at Digital Commons @ Andrews University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Andrews University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ABSTRACT THE BACKGROUNDS AND MEANING OF THE IMAGE OF THE BEAST IN REV 13:14, 15 by Rebekah Yi Liu Adviser: Dr. Jon Paulien ABSTRACT OF GRADUATE STDUENT RESEARCH Dissertation Andrews University Seventh-day Adventist Theological Seminary Title: THE BACKGROUNDS AND MEANING OF THE IMAGE OF THE BEAST IN REV 13:14, 15 Name of researcher: Rebekah Yi Liu Name and degree of faculty adviser: Jon Paulien, Ph.D. Date Completed: May 2016 Problem This dissertation investigates the first century Greco-Roman cultural backgrounds and the literary context of the motif of the image of the beast in Rev 13:14, 15, in order to answer the problem of the author’s intended meaning of the image of the beast to his first century Greco-Roman readers. Method There are six steps necessary to accomplish the task of this dissertation.
  • 'Solved by Sacrifice' : Austin Farrer, Fideism, and The

    'Solved by Sacrifice' : Austin Farrer, Fideism, and The

    ‘SOLVED BY SACRIFICE’ : AUSTIN FARRER, FIDEISM, AND THE EVIDENCE OF FAITH Robert Carroll MacSwain A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of St. Andrews 2010 Full metadata for this item is available in the St Andrews Digital Research Repository at: https://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/920 This item is protected by original copyright ‘SOLVED BY SACRIFICE’: Austin Farrer, Fideism, and the Evidence of Faith Robert Carroll MacSwain A thesis submitted to the School of Divinity of the University of St Andrews in candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The saints confute the logicians, but they do not confute them by logic but by sanctity. They do not prove the real connection between the religious symbols and the everyday realities by logical demonstration, but by life. Solvitur ambulando, said someone about Zeno’s paradox, which proves the impossibility of physical motion. It is solved by walking. Solvitur immolando, says the saint, about the paradox of the logicians. It is solved by sacrifice. —Austin Farrer v ABSTRACT 1. A perennial (if controversial) concern in both theology and philosophy of religion is whether religious belief is ‘reasonable’. Austin Farrer (1904-1968) is widely thought to affirm a positive answer to this concern. Chapter One surveys three interpretations of Farrer on ‘the believer’s reasons’ and thus sets the stage for our investigation into the development of his religious epistemology. 2. The disputed question of whether Farrer became ‘a sort of fideist’ is complicated by the many definitions of fideism.
  • The Importance of Athanasius and the Views of His Character

    The Importance of Athanasius and the Views of His Character

    The Importance of Athanasius and the Views of His Character J. Steven Davis Submitted to Dr. Jerry Sutton School of Divinity Liberty University September 19, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter I: Research Proposal Abstract .............................................................................................................................11 Background ......................................................................................................................11 Limitations ........................................................................................................................18 Method of Research .........................................................................................................19 Thesis Statement ..............................................................................................................21 Outline ...............................................................................................................................21 Bibliography .....................................................................................................................27 Chapter II: Background of Athanasius An Influential Figure .......................................................................................................33 Early Life ..........................................................................................................................33 Arian Conflict ...................................................................................................................36
  • Durham E-Theses

    Durham E-Theses

    Durham E-Theses The Meletian schism at antioch Barker, Celia B. How to cite: Barker, Celia B. (1974) The Meletian schism at antioch, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/9969/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk THE MSLETIAN SCHISM AT ANTIOCH THE MELETIAN SCHISM AT ANTIOCH THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF DURHAM BY CELIA B. BARKER, B.A. (Dunelm) FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS Department of Theology, Date: April,1974. University of Durham. (1) The object of this thesis is to examine the schism in the Church of Antioch during the Arian Controversy of the Fourth century, with a view to establishing what coherent order, if any, can be found in the course of events, and to show how the interaction of theological emphases and personal prejudices exacerbated and prolonged the Antiochene divisions.
  • CHRISTOPHER EVANS Christopher Francis Evans 1909–2012

    CHRISTOPHER EVANS Christopher Francis Evans 1909–2012

    CHRISTOPHER EVANS Christopher Francis Evans 1909–2012 THREE YOUNG MEN—two Anglican, one Methodist—studying Theology at Cambridge at various times in the 1930s were destined, though they did not know it, to become the three most influential British New Testament scholars of their generation. All were to become Fellows of the British Academy. The first was Charles Francis Digby Moule (always known as ‘Charlie’), who read classics at Emmanuel College, but then studied Theology at Ridley Hall in preparation for ordination; he became Lady Margaret’s Professor of Divinity in 1951. Youngest of the three was Charles Kingsley Barrett (known by his friends as ‘Kingsley’), who stud- ied mathe matics at Pembroke before switching to Theology and preparing for the Methodist ministry at Wesley House; he spent almost all his teach- ing career in Durham, where he became Professor of New Testament.1 In between them, and overlapping with Charlie Moule, was Christopher Francis Evans, who was for a short time Lightfoot Professor at Durham before moving to the University of London, as Professor of New Testament at King’s College. ‘Overlapping with’, and perhaps overshadowed by, Charlie Moule, who had gone up to Cambridge a year before him. In later life Christopher would relate how, as an undergraduate, he had ventured to enter for vari- ous university prizes, but would inevitably recognise Charlie’s slight figure at another desk in the examination room, whereupon his heart would 1 Both have been the subject of memoirs in this series: W. Horbury, ‘Charles Francis Digby Moule, 1908–2007’, Proceedings of the British Academy, 161, Biographical Memoirs of Fellows, VIII, 281–301; J.
  • Bibliography of Occult and Fantastic Beliefs Vol.4: S - Z

    Bibliography of Occult and Fantastic Beliefs Vol.4: S - Z

    Bruno Antonio Buike, editor / undercover-collective „Paul Smith“, alias University of Melbourne, Australia Bibliography of Occult and Fantastic Beliefs vol.4: S - Z © Neuss / Germany: Bruno Buike 2017 Buike Music and Science [email protected] BBWV E30 Bruno Antonio Buike, editor / undercover-collective „Paul Smith“, alias University of Melbourne, Australia Bibliography of Occult and Fantastic Beliefs - vol.4: S - Z Neuss: Bruno Buike 2017 CONTENT Vol. 1 A-D 273 p. Vol. 2 E-K 271 p. Vol. 3 L-R 263 p. Vol. 4 S-Z 239 p. Appr. 21.000 title entries - total 1046 p. ---xxx--- 1. Dies ist ein wissenschaftliches Projekt ohne kommerzielle Interessen. 2. Wer finanzielle Forderungen gegen dieses Projekt erhebt, dessen Beitrag und Name werden in der nächsten Auflage gelöscht. 3. Das Projekt wurde gefördert von der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Sozialamt Neuss. 4. Rechtschreibfehler zu unterlassen, konnte ich meinem Computer trotz jahrelanger Versuche nicht beibringen. Im Gegenteil: Das Biest fügt immer wieder neue Fehler ein, wo vorher keine waren! 1. This is a scientific project without commercial interests, that is not in bookstores, but free in Internet. 2. Financial and legal claims against this project, will result in the contribution and the name of contributor in the next edition canceled. 3. This project has been sponsored by the Federal Republic of Germany, Department for Social Benefits, city of Neuss. 4. Correct spelling and orthography is subject of a constant fight between me and my computer – AND THE SOFTWARE in use – and normally the other side is the winning party! Editor`s note – Vorwort des Herausgebers preface 1 ENGLISH SHORT PREFACE „Paul Smith“ is a FAKE-IDENTY behind which very probably is a COLLCETIVE of writers and researchers, using a more RATIONAL and SOBER approach towards the complex of Rennes-le-Chateau and to related complex of „Priory of Sion“ (Prieure de Sion of Pierre Plantard, Geradrd de Sede, Phlippe de Cherisey, Jean-Luc Chaumeil and others).
  • This Thesis Has Been Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for a Postgraduate Degree (E.G

    This Thesis Has Been Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for a Postgraduate Degree (E.G

    This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. Constructing Paul, (Dis)Placing Ephesians The Pauline Book and the Dilemma of Ephesians Benjamin J. Petroelje Doctor of Philosophy New Testament and Christian Origins The University of Edinburgh 2018 For Amy, Norah, Rose, and Teddy With Love Declaration I declare that this thesis was composed by myself, that the work contained herein is my own except where explicitly stated otherwise in the text, and that this work has not been submitted for any other degree or professional qualification. __________________________________ Benjamin J. Petroelje - iii - Contents Abstract .....................................................................................................................................................