DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 75, No. 77/Thursday, April 22, 2010/Notices

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register/Vol. 75, No. 77/Thursday, April 22, 2010/Notices 21046 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 77 / Thursday, April 22, 2010 / Notices Biology, University of North Dates: October 1, 2010 to September 30, Note: A portion of this session may be Carolina, Wilmington, NC 28403. 2012. closed to protect information that is Nadene G. Kennedy, proprietary to General Electric-Hitachi Activity for Which Permit is Permit Officer, Office of Polar Programs. pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4). Requested: Take and Import into the 4:15 p.m.–7 p.m.: Preparation of U.S.A. The applicant plans to salvage [FR Doc. 2010–9319 Filed 4–21–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7555–01–P ACRS Reports (Open)—The Committee sediments from abandoned and active will discuss proposed ACRS reports on penguin colonies by excavation of small matters discussed during this meeting. pits, no larger than 1x1 meter, in each area. In addition, the applicant will NUCLEAR REGULATORY Friday, May 7, 2010, Conference Room collect 10 each organic remains (bones, COMMISSION T2–B1, Two White Flint North, Rockville, Maryland tissue, feathers, eggshell fragments, Advisory Committee on Reactor otoliths, squid beaks, and other prey Safeguards 8:30 a.m.–8:35 a.m.: Opening remains) from sediments in abandoned Remarks by the ACRS Chairman colonies of Adelie, Chinstrap, Gentoo, In accordance with the purposes of (Open)—The ACRS Chairman will make Emperor, and Macaroni penguins, Sections 29 and 182b of the Atomic opening remarks regarding the conduct Southern Giant Petrel, Antarctic Petrel, Energy Act (42 U.S.C. 2039, 2232b), the of the meeting. Cape Petrel, Snow Petrel, Blue Petrel, Advisory Committee on Reactor 8:35 a.m.–10 a.m.: Future ACRS Antarctic Fulmar, White-chinned petrel, Safeguards (ACRS) will hold a meeting Activities/Report of the Planning and Sooty shearwater, Wilson’s Storm- on May 6–8, 2010, 11545 Rockville Pike, Procedures Subcommittee (Open/ petrel, Black-bellied storm-petrel, Blue- Rockville, Maryland. The date of this Closed)—The Committee will hear eyed shag, Greater sheathbill, South meeting was previously published in presentations by and hold discussions Polar Skua, Brown Skua, Kelp gull, and the Federal Register on Monday, with representatives of the NRC staff Antarctic Tern. October 14, 2009, (74 FR 52829–52830). regarding items proposed for consideration by the Full Committee The applicant also plans to capture Thursday, May 6, 2010, Conference during future ACRS meetings, and 100 each of adult or juvenile Adelie, Room T2–B1, Two White Flint North, Report of the Planning and Procedures Chinstrap and Gentoo penguins to Rockville, Maryland Subcommittee on matters related to the collect some breast feathers and blood 8:30 a.m.–8:35 a.m.: Opening conduct of ACRS Business, including samples for analysis of carbon and Remarks by the ACRS Chairman anticipated workload and member nitrogen isotope values to examine (Open)—The ACRS Chairman will make assignments. diets, and for mercury (Hg). All capture opening remarks regarding the conduct bird will be released. Note: A portion of this session may be of the meeting. closed pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(2) and (6) Location: 8:35 a.m.–9:30 a.m.: Revision 1C to to discuss organizational and personnel NUREG–1536, ‘‘Standard Review Plan ASPA 102–Rookery Islands, Holme Bay, matters that relate solely to internal for Spent Fuel Storage Systems at a ASPA 103–Ardery and Odbert Islands, ASPA personnel rules and practices of ACRS, and General License Facility’’ (Open)—The 104–Sabrina Island, Balleny Island, ASPA information the release of which would Committee will hear presentations by constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 105–Beaufort Island, ASPA 106–Cape Hallett, personal privacy. Victoria Land, ASPA 107–Dion Islands, and hold discussions with ASPA 108–Green Island, Berthelot Islands, representatives of the NRC staff 10 a.m.–10:15 a.m.: Reconciliation of ASPA 109–Moa Island, South Orkneys, regarding proposed Revision 1C to ACRS Comments and ASPA 110–Lynch Island, South Orkneys, NUREG–1536, ‘‘Standard Review Plan Recommendations (Open)—The ASPA 111–Southern Powell Island and for Spent Fuel Storage Systems at a Committee will discuss the responses adjacent islands, South Orkneys, ASPA 112– General License Facility,’’ and the NRC from the NRC Executive Director for Coppermine Peninsula, Robert Island, ASPA staff’s resolution of public comments. Operations to comments and 113–Litchfield Island, Arthur Harbor, Palmer 9:45 a.m.–11:15 a.m.: Preparation for recommendations included in recent Archipelago, ASPA 114–North Coronation Meeting with the Commission on June 9, ACRS reports and letters. Island, ASPA 115-Lagotellerie Island, 2010 (Open)—The Committee will 10:30 a.m.–7 p.m.: Preparation of Marguerite Bay, ASPA 116–New College discuss the topics for meeting with the ACRS Reports (Open)—The Committee Valley, Caughley Beach, Cape Bird ASPA Commission on June 9, 2010. will continue its discussion of proposed 117–Avian Island, northwest Marguerite Bay, 11:30 a.m.–12 p.m.: Meeting with the ACRS reports. NRC Chairman (Open)—The Committee ASPA 121–Cape Royds, Ross Island, ASPA Saturday, May 8, 2010, Conference 124–Cape Crozier, Ross Island, ASPA 125– will hold discussions with the NRC Room T2–B1, Two White Flint North, Fildes Peninsula, King George Island, South Chairman to discuss topics of mutual Rockville, Maryland Shetland Islands, ASPA 126–Byers interest. Peninsula, Livingston Island, ASPA 127– 1 p.m.–4 p.m.: Boiling Water Reactor 8:30 a.m.–12:30 p.m.: Preparation of Haswell Island, ASPA 128-Western shore of (BWR) Owners Group (BWROG) Topical ACRS Reports (Open)—The Committee Admiralty Bay, King George Island, ASPA Report NEDC–33347P, ‘‘Containment will continue its discussion of proposed 129–Rothera Point, Adelaide Island, ASPA Overpressure (COP) Credit for Net ACRS reports. 132–Potter Peninsula, King George Island, Positive Suction Head (NPSH)’’ and the 12:30 p.m.–1 p.m.: Miscellaneous ASPA 133–Harmony Point, Nelson Island, Staff’s Proposed Guidance for the Use of (Open)—The Committee will continue ASPA 134–Cierva Point, Danco Coast, ASPA COP (Open/Closed)—The Committee its discussion related to the conduct of 135–Bailey Peninsula, Budd Coast, ASPA will hold discussions with Committee activities and specific issues 136–Clark Peninsula, Budd Coast, ASPA representatives of the NRC staff and the that were not completed during 139–Biscoe Point, Anvers Island, Palmer BWROG regarding the staff’s review of previous meetings. Archipelago, ASPA 143–Marine Plain, Mule Revision 0 to Topical Report NEDC– Procedures for the conduct of and Peninsula, Vestfold Hills, ASPA 149–Cape 33347P, ‘‘COP Credit for Net Positive participation in ACRS meetings were Shirreff, Livingston Island and ASPA 150– Suction Head,’’ and the NRC staff’s published in the Federal Register on Ardley Island, King George Island. proposed guidance for the use of COP. October 14, 2009, (74 FR 52829–52830). VerDate Nov<24>2008 18:25 Apr 21, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00070 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22APN1.SGM 22APN1 srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 77 / Thursday, April 22, 2010 / Notices 21047 In accordance with those procedures, responsible for telephone line charges Week of May 17, 2010—Tentative oral or written views may be presented and for providing the equipment and There are no meetings scheduled for by members of the public, including facilities that they use to establish the the week of May 17, 2010. representatives of the nuclear industry. video teleconferencing link. The Persons desiring to make oral statements availability of video teleconferencing Week of May 24, 2010—Tentative should notify Mr. Derek Widmayer, services is not guaranteed. Thursday, May 27, 2010 Cognizant ACRS Staff (Telephone: 301– Dated: April 16, 2010. 415–7366, e-mail: 9:30 a.m. Briefing on the Results of the Andrew L. Bates, [email protected]), five days Agency Action Review Meeting, before the meeting, if possible, so that Advisory Committee Management Officer. (AARM) (Public Meeting), (Contact: appropriate arrangements can be made [FR Doc. 2010–9299 Filed 4–21–10; 8:45 am] Nathan Sanfilippo, 301–415–3951). to allow necessary time during the BILLING CODE 7590–01–P This meeting will be Webcast live at meeting for such statements. In view of the Web address: http://www.nrc.gov. the possibility that the schedule for * * * * * ACRS meetings may be adjusted by the NUCLEAR REGULATORY * The schedule for Commission Chairman as necessary to facilitate the COMMISSION meetings is subject to change on short conduct of the meeting, persons notice. To verify the status of meetings, planning to attend should check with [NRC–2010–0002] call (recording)—(301) 415–1292. the Cognizant ACRS staff if such Contact person for more information: rescheduling would result in major Sunshine Act; Meeting Notice Rochelle Bavol, (301) 415–1651. inconvenience. * * * * * AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETINGS: Nuclear Thirty-five hard copies of each The NRC Commission Meeting Regulatory Commission [NRC–2010– presentation or handout should be Schedule can be found on the Internet 0002]. provided 30 minutes before the meeting. at: http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/policy- In addition, one electronic copy of each DATES: Weeks of April 19, 26, May 3, 10, making/schedule.html. presentation should be emailed to the 17, 24, 2010. * * * * * Cognizant ACRS Staff one day before PLACE: Commissioners’ Conference The NRC provides reasonable meeting. If an electronic copy cannot be accommodation to individuals with provided within this timeframe, Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. disabilities where appropriate. If you presenters should provide the Cognizant need a reasonable accommodation to STATUS: Public and Closed. ACRS Staff with a CD containing each participate in these public meetings, or presentation at least 30 minutes before Week of April 19, 2010 need this meeting notice or the the meeting.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Management Plan for Specially Protected Area No. 8 Dion Islands, Marguerite Bay, Antarctic Peninsula
    ANNEX TO RECOMMENDATION XVI-6 Management Plan for Specially Protected Area No. 8 Dion Islands, Marguerite Bay, Antarctic Peninsula 1. Geographical location The Dion Islands (67°52'S, 68°43'W) are a small group of low-lying rocky islands lying about 13 km south of the southern end of Adelaide Island, in the north- western part of Marguerite Bay. 2. Management Plan (i) Description of Area The Area comprises all of the Dion Islands archipelago, which lie within an area of about 12 km2, together with the intervening sea. The islands and islets are small, rocky and often precipitous, notably Emperor Island which is also the highest (46 m altitude). The main islands are the largest of the Courtier Islands group (c. 8 ha), Emperor Island (c. 5 ha) and the largest of the Consort Islands group (c. 3 ha). Low lying areas occur on the two largest islands. There are a few small permanent ice patches, but there are no streams or permanent pools. (ii) Reason for designation The Area possesses the only known breeding population of Emperor penguins (Aptenodytes forsteri) on the west side of the Antarctic Peninsula. It is situated on a low-lying raised beach and rocky headland in the south-eastern part of Emperor Island. It is also the most northerly and probably the smallest colony (annual numbers fluctuate between about 50 and 500 pairs), and is one of only two in which breeding occurs on land (see also SPA No. 1). It is also the most isolated Emperor colony, being about 2,500 km (by sea) from the nearest other known rookery.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Status Assessment Emperor Penguin (Aptenodytes Fosteri)
    SPECIES STATUS ASSESSMENT EMPEROR PENGUIN (APTENODYTES FOSTERI) Emperor penguin chicks being socialized by male parents at Auster Rookery, 2008. Photo Credit: Gary Miller, Australian Antarctic Program. Version 1.0 December 2020 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ecological Services Program Branch of Delisting and Foreign Species Falls Church, Virginia Acknowledgements: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Penguins are flightless birds that are highly adapted for the marine environment. The emperor penguin (Aptenodytes forsteri) is the tallest and heaviest of all living penguin species. Emperors are near the top of the Southern Ocean’s food chain and primarily consume Antarctic silverfish, Antarctic krill, and squid. They are excellent swimmers and can dive to great depths. The average life span of emperor penguin in the wild is 15 to 20 years. Emperor penguins currently breed at 61 colonies located around Antarctica, with the largest colonies in the Ross Sea and Weddell Sea. The total population size is estimated at approximately 270,000–280,000 breeding pairs or 625,000–650,000 total birds. Emperor penguin depends upon stable fast ice throughout their 8–9 month breeding season to complete the rearing of its single chick. They are the only warm-blooded Antarctic species that breeds during the austral winter and therefore uniquely adapted to its environment. Breeding colonies mainly occur on fast ice, close to the coast or closely offshore, and amongst closely packed grounded icebergs that prevent ice breaking out during the breeding season and provide shelter from the wind. Sea ice extent in the Southern Ocean has undergone considerable inter-annual variability over the last 40 years, although with much greater inter-annual variability in the five sectors than for the Southern Ocean as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Emperor Island, Dion Islands, Marguerite Bay, Antarctic Peninsula
    From Measure 1 (2002) Management Plan for Antarctic Specially Protected Area No. 107 EMPEROR ISLAND, DION ISLANDS, MARGUERITE BAY, ANTARCTIC PENINSULA 1. Description of values to be protected The Dion Islands (Latitude 67°52’ S, Longitude 68°42’ W), on the western side of the central Antarctic Peninsula in north-western Marguerite Bay, were originally designated as Specially Protected Area (SPA) No. 8 through Recommendation IV-8 in 1966 after a proposal by the United Kingdom. All of the islands in the Dion Islands archipelago were included. Values protected under the original designation were described as the presence of the only colony of emperor penguins (Aptenodytes forsteri) known to exist on the west side of the Antarctic Peninsula and that the isolation of this colony from others of the same species makes it of outstanding scientific interest. A management plan for the Area was adopted through Recommendation XVI-6 (1990), which reaffirmed the values of the Area. The boundaries were extended to include the intervening sea between the islands to ensure protection of the emperors at sea or on sea-ice in the immediate vicinity. Attention was drawn to the additional important value of the colony being one of only two known in which breeding occurs on land. It was also noted as the most northerly and probably the smallest of Emperor colonies, with annual numbers fluctuating around 150 pairs. The values of the emperor penguin colony are reaffirmed in this revised management plan. The boundaries of the Area are now defined more precisely.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Plan for Antarctic Specially Protected Area No. 116 NEW COLLEGE VALLEY, CAUGHLEY BEACH, CAPE BIRD, ROSS ISLAND
    Management Plan For Antarctic Specially Protected Area No. 116 NEW COLLEGE VALLEY, CAUGHLEY BEACH, CAPE BIRD, ROSS ISLAND 1. Description of values to be protected In 1985, two areas at Cape Bird, Ross Island were designated as SSSI No. 10, Caughley Beach (Recommendation XIII-8 (1985)) and SPA No. 20, New College Valley (Recommendation XIII-12 (1985)), following proposals by New Zealand that these areas should be protected because they contained some of the richest stands of moss and associated microflora and fauna in the Ross Sea region of Antarctica. This is the only area on Ross Island where protection is specifically given to plant assemblages and associated ecosystems. At that time, SPA No. 20 was enclosed within SSSI No. 10, in order to provide more stringent access conditions to that part of the Area. In 2000, SSSI No. 10 was incorporated with SPA No. 20 by Measure 1 (2000), with the former area covered by SPA No. 20 becoming a Restricted Zone within the revised SPA No. 20. The boundaries of the Area were revised from the boundaries in the original recommendations, in view of improved mapping and to follow more closely the ridges enclosing the catchment of New College Valley. Caughley Beach itself was adjacent to, but never a part of, the original Area, and for this reason the entire Area was renamed as New College Valley, which was within both of the original sites. The Area was redesignated by Decision 1 (2002) as Antarctic Specially Protected Area (ASPA) No. 116 and a revised Management Plan was adopted through Measure 1 (2006).
    [Show full text]
  • The Antarctic Treaty
    The Antarctic Treaty Measures adopted at the Thirty-ninth Consultative Meeting held at Santiago, Chile 23 May – 1 June 2016 Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs by Command of Her Majesty November 2017 Cm 9542 © Crown copyright 2017 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3 Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/government/publications Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at Treaty Section, Foreign and Commonwealth Office, King Charles Street, London, SW1A 2AH ISBN 978-1-5286-0126-9 CCS1117441642 11/17 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majestyʼs Stationery Office MEASURES ADOPTED AT THE THIRTY-NINTH ANTARCTIC TREATY CONSULTATIVE MEETING Santiago, Chile 23 May – 1 June 2016 The Measures1 adopted at the Thirty-ninth Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting are reproduced below from the Final Report of the Meeting. In accordance with Article IX, paragraph 4, of the Antarctic Treaty, the Measures adopted at Consultative Meetings become effective upon approval by all Contracting Parties whose representatives were entitled to participate in the meeting at which they were adopted (i.e. all the Consultative Parties). The full text of the Final Report of the Meeting, including the Decisions and Resolutions adopted at that Meeting and colour copies of the maps found in this command paper, is available on the website of the Antarctic Treaty Secretariat at www.ats.aq/documents.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 84, No. 78/Tuesday, April 23, 2019/Rules
    Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 78 / Tuesday, April 23, 2019 / Rules and Regulations 16791 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., nor does it require Agricultural commodities, Pesticides SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The any special considerations under and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978, as Executive Order 12898, entitled requirements. amended (‘‘ACA’’) (16 U.S.C. 2401, et ‘‘Federal Actions to Address Dated: April 12, 2019. seq.) implements the Protocol on Environmental Justice in Minority Environmental Protection to the Richard P. Keigwin, Jr., Populations and Low-Income Antarctic Treaty (‘‘the Protocol’’). Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16, Director, Office of Pesticide Programs. Annex V contains provisions for the 1994). Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is protection of specially designated areas Since tolerances and exemptions that amended as follows: specially managed areas and historic are established on the basis of a petition sites and monuments. Section 2405 of under FFDCA section 408(d), such as PART 180—[AMENDED] title 16 of the ACA directs the Director the tolerance exemption in this action, of the National Science Foundation to ■ do not require the issuance of a 1. The authority citation for part 180 issue such regulations as are necessary proposed rule, the requirements of the continues to read as follows: and appropriate to implement Annex V Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371. to the Protocol. et seq.) do not apply. ■ 2. Add § 180.1365 to subpart D to read The Antarctic Treaty Parties, which This action directly regulates growers, as follows: includes the United States, periodically food processors, food handlers, and food adopt measures to establish, consolidate retailers, not States or tribes.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Plan for Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 135 NORTH-EAST BAILEY PENINSULA, BUDD COAST, WILKES LAND
    Management Plan for Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 135 NORTH-EAST BAILEY PENINSULA, BUDD COAST, WILKES LAND Introduction North-East Bailey Peninsula (66°16’59.9"S, 110°31’59.9"E) is located approximately 200m east of Australia’s Casey station, in the Windmill Islands region of the Budd Coast, Wilkes Land, East Antarctica. It was designated as Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) No 16 under Recommendation XIII-8 (1985), after a proposal by Australia. In accordance with Decision 1 (2002) the site was redesignated and renumbered as Antarctic Specially Protected Area (ASPA) No 135. Revised management plans for the Area were adopted under Measure 2 (2003) and Measure 8 (2008). The ASPA is designated primarily as a scientific reference site which, since the early 1980s, has supported a range of studies into the diverse assemblage of vegetation found in the area. The close proximity of the Area to Casey station allows ease of access for field research but also creates the potential for disturbance of study areas. 1. Description of values to be protected The North-east Bailey Peninsula Antarctic Specially Protected Area (the Area) is representative of a diverse assemblage of the Windmill Islands region flora. As such, the Area has intrinsic ecological value and scientific importance, particularly to botanists, microbiologists, soil scientists and glacial geomorphologists. The Area contains three extensive and contrasting moss fields that have been the subject of taxonomic, ecological and physiological studies since the summer of 1982/83. Additional studies have included population ecology of invertebrates associated with the vegetation, and soil/water chemistry.
    [Show full text]
  • ~©L%~Bulletin No
    The International Council for Science ~©L%~bulletin No. 150 July 2003 Measures, Decisions and Resolutions adopted at the Twenty-fifth Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting Warsaw, Poland, 10-20 September 2002 p 1 = Published by the SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE ON ANTARCTIC RESEARCH at the Scott Polar Research Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom THE INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR SCIENCE SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE ON ANTARCTIC RESEARCH SCAR BULLETIN No 150, July 2003 Twenty-fifth Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting Warsaw, Poland, 10-20 September 2002 Decisions, Resolutions and Measures MEASURE 1 (2002) Antarctic Protected Area System: Management Plans Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 124, Cape for Antarctic Specially Protected Areas Crozier, Ross Island; The Representatives, Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 126, Byers Recalling Resolution 1 (1998) allocating responsibility Peninsula, Livingston Island; among Consultative Parties for the revision of Management Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 130, "Tram­ Plans for Protected areas; way Ridge", Mount Erebus, Ross Island; Noting that the draft Management Plans appended to this • Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 137, North­ Measure have been endorsed by the Committee for west White Island, McMurdo Sound; Environmentqal Protection and the Scientific Committee • Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 147, Abla­ on Antarctic Research (SCAR); tion Point - Ganymede Heights; Recognizing that these Areas support outstanding natural Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 148, Mount features and biota of scientific interest; Flora, Hope Bay; Recommend to their Governments the following Measure Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 157, Back­ for approval in accordance with paragraph 1 of Article 6 of door Bay, Cape Royds, Ross Island. Annex V to the Protocol on Environmental Protection to and which are annexed to this Measure, be adopted.
    [Show full text]
  • The Antarctic Treaty
    Miscellaneous No. 7 (2007) The Antarctic Treaty Measures adopted at the Twenty-ninth Consultative Meeting held at Edinburgh 12 – 23 June 2006 Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs by Command of Her Majesty July 2007 Cm 7167 £17.00 Miscellaneous No. 7 (2007) The Antarctic Treaty Measures adopted at the Twenty-ninth Consultative Meeting held at Edinburgh 12 – 23 June 2006 Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs by Command of Her Majesty July 2007 Cm 7167 £17.00 © Crown copyright 2007 The text in this document (excluding the Royal Arms and departmental logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the title of the document specified. Any enquiries relating to the copyright in this document should be addressed to the Licensing Division, HMSO, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ. Fax 01603 723000 or e-mail: [email protected] MEASURES ADOPTED AT THE TWENTY-NINTH CONSULTATIVE MEETING HELD AT EDINBURGH 12 - 23 JUNE 2006 The Measures1 adopted at the Twenty-ninth Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting are reproduced below from the Final Report of the Meeting. In accordance with Article IX, paragraph 4, of the Antarctic Treaty, the Measures adopted at Consultative Meetings become effective upon approval by all Contracting Parties whose representatives were entitled to participate in the meeting at which they were adopted (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • 1- 7555-01 NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION Notice of Permit Applications Received Under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 09/28/2015 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2015-24522, and on FDsys.gov 7555-01 NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION Notice of Permit Applications Received Under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978 AGENCY: National Science Foundation ACTION: Notice of Permit Applications Received under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978, P.L. 95-541. SUMMARY: The National Science Foundation (NSF) is required to publish a notice of permit applications received to conduct activities regulated under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978. NSF has published regulations under the Antarctic Conservation Act at Title 45 Part 670 of the Code of Federal Regulations. This is the required notice of permit applications received. DATES: Interested parties are invited to submit written data, comments, or views with respect to this permit application by [INSERT 30 DAYS FROM DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. This application may be inspected by interested parties at the Permit Office, address below. ADDRESSES: Comments should be addressed to Permit Office, Room 755, Division of Polar Programs, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22230. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Li Ling Hamady, ACA Permit Officer, at the above address or [email protected] or (703) 292-7149. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The National Science Foundation, as directed by the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978 (Public Law 95-541), as amended by the Antarctic Science, Tourism and Conservation Act of 1996, has developed regulations for the establishment of a permit system for various activities in Antarctica and designation of certain animals and certain geographic areas a requiring special protection.
    [Show full text]
  • Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 116 (New College Valley, Caughley Beach, Cape Bird, Ross Island): Revised Management Plan
    Measure 1 (2011) Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 116 (New College Valley, Caughley Beach, Cape Bird, Ross Island): Revised Management Plan The Representatives, Recalling Articles 3, 5 and 6 of Annex V to the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty providing for the designation of Antarctic Specially Protected Areas (“ASPA”) and approval of Management Plans for those Areas; Recalling Recommendation XIII-8 (1985), which designated Caughley Beach as Site of Special Scientific Interest (“SSSI”) No 10 and annexed a Management Plan for the site; Recommendation XIII-12 (1985), which designated New College Valley as Specially Protected Area (“SPA”) No 20; Recommendation XVI-7 (1991), which extended the expiry date of SSSI 10 to 31 December 2001; Recommendation XVII-2 (1992), which annexed a Management Plan for SPA 20; Measure 1 (2000), which expanded SPA 20 to incorporate Caughley Beach, annexed a revised Management Plan for the Area, and provided that thereupon SSSI 10 shall cease to exist; Decision 1 (2002), which renamed and renumbered SPA 20 as ASPA 116; Measure 1 (2006), which adopted a revised Management Plan for ASPA 116; Recalling that Recommendation XVI-7 (1991) and Measure 1 (2000) have not become effective, and that Recommendation XVII-2 (1992) was withdrawn by Measure 1 (2010); Recalling that Recommendation XIII-12 (1985) and Recommendation XVI-7 (1991) are designated as no longer current by Decision E (2011); Noting that the Committee for Environmental Protection has endorsed a revised Management Plan for ASPA 116; Desiring to replace the existing Management Plan for ASPA 116 with the revised Management Plan; Recommend to their Governments the following Measure for approval in accordance with paragraph 1 of Article 6 of Annex V to the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty: That: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Antarctic Treaty
    ! ! ! ! ! ! The Antarctic Treaty ! ! ! ! Measures adopted at the Thirty-ninth Consultative Meeting held at Santiago, Chile 23 May – 1 June 2016 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs by Command of Her Majesty November 2017! Cm 9542 © Crown copyright 2017 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3 Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/government/publications Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at Treaty Section, Foreign and Commonwealth Office, King Charles Street, London, SW1A 2AH ISBN 978-1-5286-0126-9 CCS1117441642 11/17 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty!s Stationery Office MEASURES ADOPTED AT THE THIRTY-NINTH ANTARCTIC TREATY CONSULTATIVE MEETING Santiago, Chile 23 May – 1 June 2016 The Measures1 adopted at the Thirty-ninth Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting are reproduced below from the Final Report of the Meeting. In accordance with Article IX, paragraph 4, of the Antarctic Treaty, the Measures adopted at Consultative Meetings become effective upon approval by all Contracting Parties whose representatives were entitled to participate in the meeting at which they were adopted (i.e. all the Consultative Parties). The full text of the Final Report of the Meeting, including the Decisions and Resolutions adopted at that Meeting and colour copies of the maps found in this command paper, is available on the website of the Antarctic Treaty Secretariat at www.ats.aq/documents.
    [Show full text]