DOCSLIB.ORG

Kv17 Report Study Tour for Dipd Partners

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

KV17 REPORT STUDY TOUR FOR DIPD PARTNERS KV17 STUDY TOUR FOR DIPD PARTNERS “If politicians view leadership as a responsibility as many Danish politicians do, unlike some of the leaders in other parts of the world who view leadership as a chance for looting people’s resources, then we will be able to reduce conflicts especially in many developing countries.” Doris Cornell Gillius, Tanzania 2 KV17 STUDY TOUR FOR DIPD PARTNERS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 4 2. OBJECTIVES AND PROGRAMME .......................................................................................... 5 OBJECTIVES............................................................................................................................. 5 PROGRAMME ........................................................................................................................... 5 3. SPECIAL FOCUS: YOUTH INCLUSION IN POLITICS ............................................................ 6 REFLECTIONS ON THE 2017 LOCAL ELECTIONS................................................................ 6 TURNOUT .............................................................................................................................. 7 NEW PARTIES ...................................................................................................................... 7 WOMEN IN LOCAL POLITICS .............................................................................................. 8 4. THE VENUE: JOHAN BORUP’S FOLK HIGH SCHOOL ........................................................ 10 5. VISITING THE DANISH MUNICIPALITIES ............................................................................ 11 LOCAL PROGRAMMES .......................................................................................................... 11 TRAVELOGUE: GLIMPSES FROM THE VISITS IN THE MUNICIPALITIES ......................... 13 STORIES FROM THE FIELD: THE EXPERIENCE OF VISITING A MUNICIPALITY ............ 15 STORIES FROM THE FIELD: THE EXPERIENCE OF BEING A LOCAL HOST ................... 18 6. THE DANISH MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS IN A GLOBAL MIRROR ......................................... 21 7. ACTION LAB: THE FRUITFULNESS OF EXCHANGING IDEAS AND EXPERIENCES ....... 23 BEHIND THE SCENES ........................................................................................................... 23 FREE, FAIR AND CREDIBLE ELECTIONS? .......................................................................... 23 ACTION LAB IN PICTURES .................................................................................................... 25 GLOBAL ACTION POINTS ..................................................................................................... 26 SHARING ACTION POINTS ................................................................................................ 26 ACTION POINTS ELABORATED............................................................................................ 27 8. THANK YOU............................................................................................................................ 31 ANNEX 1: PROGRAMME ........................................................................................................... 32 ANNEX 2: SEMINAR PRESENTERS ......................................................................................... 36 ANNEX 3: MEDIA COVERAGE .................................................................................................. 37 ANNEX 4: THE DELEGATIONS ................................................................................................. 38 ANNEX 5: LIST OF PARTICIPANTS .......................................................................................... 41 ANNEX 6: LIST OF DIPD STAFF ............................................................................................... 47 3 KV17 STUDY TOUR FOR DIPD PARTNERS 1. INTRODUCTION In late November, we received 70 representatives from DIPD partners around the world here in Denmark. They came from far reaches of the world with one collective purpose; to observe the 2017 Danish local elections. We happily received representatives from 13 different countries, namely Tanzania, Kenya, Malawi, Bhutan, Myanmar, Palestine, Nepal, Egypt, Columbia, Ukraine, Bolivia, Philippines and Malaysia The KV17 Study Tour has been an opportunity to share, inspire and learn – not only from the Danish local democracy but also by fostering relations and knowledge sharing across delegations. At the same time, it was also an occasion for DIPD and the Danish political parties to learn from the delegates experiences with local politics in their home countries. The overall purpose of the study tour was to strengthen the capacity to work with local level politics by studying the Danish Municipality Elections and bringing home useful knowledge, experiences and skills. The focus of this year’s study tour was youth inclusion in local politics. This includes a special attention to young candidates, youth as an important force in campaigning and the mobilization of young voters. The Danish democratic system is no blueprint. DIPD is not interested in exporting the Danish way of conducting local elections. The aim of this study tour was simply to share what Denmark has developed over many decades, and for the Danish local politicians to learn from the delegates in return. When we look across the many DIPD programs, they have one thing in common: it is in the meeting and mirroring between politically active people, across cultures and nationalities, that the useful idea generation takes place. This was very much what happened in the course of a week, a cold, windy, heartwarming weeklong gathering of friends, united in election observation. Christiansborg Castle, home of the Danish parliament, Folketinget. Photo: Jorge Láscar 4 KV17 STUDY TOUR FOR DIPD PARTNERS 2. OBJECTIVES AND PROGRAMME The overall purpose of the study tour is to strengthen the capacity of partners in their work with youth inclusion in local level politics, based on inspirations from the ‘Danish Way’. At the same time the presence of multiple parties, representing countries with different political situations, enables a productive south-south environment. The KV17 programme consists of three overarching elements: an introductory seminar, a local community programme and an action lab seminar. OBJECTIVES The objectives of the introductory seminar are the following: 1. Provide the delegates with an introduction to the most important aspects of the local election system, the Danish local democracy, the history and how council members are elected. 2. Provide an understanding of the most important issues (political and substantive) at stake in this election and how parties are positioned on these issues. 3. Explain the role of the Danish youth in politics and what past, present and future obstacles they might be facing. The objectives of the local community programme are the following: 1. To serve as a reality check and link between the introductory seminar and the action lab seminar. 2. To provide an opportunity to experience how the electoral process and the Election Day is managed at the local community level in different parts of the country and partake in the electoral activities. 3. To experience how ordinary members and officials of the political parties engage with their constituencies, and to learn about the multiparty negotiations and coalition building, taking place through dialogue. The objectives of the action lab seminar are the following: 1. To challenge and share existing perspectives regarding youth in politics and local democracy by engaging in discussions on different procedures and believes. 2. To discuss how the lessons learned can be relevant in the very different local level political settings, which the delegates are representing. 3. For each delegate to develop his/her own action points to solve the problems and challenges upon return home. PROGRAMME The development of this year’s programme was all about creating a dynamic and inspirational package for the delegates. We wanted the programme to invite the delegates to reflect, to engage, to question and to listen. The aim was to create a programme that was useful as well as meaningful for every single participant, being an academic or not, being an MP or not, being woman or man, being young or old. The main focus of the programme has been on the democratic functioning and structure of parties and how to establish sustainable political dialogues. One of the key ingredients in a seminar like KV17 is contributions from the participants. The programme thus aimed at encouraging debate and dialogue, providing everyone with responsibility for a fruitful seminar outcome. See the programme in annex 1. 5 KV17 STUDY TOUR FOR DIPD PARTNERS 3. SPECIAL FOCUS: YOUTH INCLUSION IN POLITICS Women and youth inclusion are important areas, as we in Denmark have a lot of useful inspiration and experiences to offer in this regard. DIPD believe that women, young people and dialogue are extremely important ingredients to foster democracy. During the previous DIPD study tour back in 2013 the focus of the seminar was on women in politics. For the 2017 study tour DIPD chose to focus on youth inclusion. There are more new than established democracies in the world today, and in transition countries the inclusion of youth in politics is particularly important.
Recommended publications
  • Liberalism, Social Democracy, and Tom Kent Kenneth C

    Liberalism, Social Democracy, and Tom Kent Kenneth C

    Liberalism, Social Democracy, and Tom Kent Kenneth C. Dewar Journal of Canadian Studies/Revue d'études canadiennes, Volume 53, Number/numéro 1, Winter/hiver 2019, pp. 178-196 (Article) Published by University of Toronto Press For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/719555 Access provided by Mount Saint Vincent University (19 Mar 2019 13:29 GMT) Journal of Canadian Studies • Revue d’études canadiennes Liberalism, Social Democracy, and Tom Kent KENNETH C. DEWAR Abstract: This article argues that the lines separating different modes of thought on the centre-left of the political spectrum—liberalism, social democracy, and socialism, broadly speaking—are permeable, and that they share many features in common. The example of Tom Kent illustrates the argument. A leading adviser to Lester B. Pearson and the Liberal Party from the late 1950s to the early 1970s, Kent argued for expanding social security in a way that had a number of affinities with social democracy. In his paper for the Study Conference on National Problems in 1960, where he set out his philosophy of social security, and in his actions as an adviser to the Pearson government, he supported social assis- tance, universal contributory pensions, and national, comprehensive medical insurance. In close asso- ciation with his philosophy, he also believed that political parties were instruments of policy-making. Keywords: political ideas, Canada, twentieth century, liberalism, social democracy Résumé : Cet article soutient que les lignes séparant les différents modes de pensée du centre gauche de l’éventail politique — libéralisme, social-démocratie et socialisme, généralement parlant — sont perméables et qu’ils partagent de nombreuses caractéristiques.
  • The Committee of the Regions and the Danish Presidency of the Council of the European Union 01 Editorial by the President of the Committee of the Regions 3

    The Committee of the Regions and the Danish Presidency of the Council of the European Union 01 Editorial by the President of the Committee of the Regions 3

    EUROPEAN UNION Committee of the Regions The Committee of the Regions and the Danish Presidency of the Council of the European Union 01 Editorial by the President of the Committee of the Regions 3 02 Editorial by the Danish Minister for European Aff airs 4 03 Why a Committee of the Regions? 6 Building bridges between the local, the regional and 04 the global - Danish Members at work 9 05 Danish Delegation to the Committee of the Regions 12 06 The decentralised Danish authority model 17 EU policy is also domestic policy 07 - Chairmen of Local Government Denmark and Danish Regions 20 08 EU-funded projects in Denmark 22 09 The 5th European Summit of Regions and Cities 26 10 Calendar of events 28 11 Contacts 30 EUROPEAN UNION Committee of the Regions Editorial by the President of 01 the Committee of the Regions Meeting the challenges together We have already had a taste of Danish culture via NOMA, recognised as the best restaurant in the world for two years running by the UK’s Restaurants magazine for putting Nordic cuisine back on the map. Though merely whetting our appetites, this taster has confi rmed Denmark’s infl uential contribution to our continent’s cultural wealth. Happily, Denmark’s contribution to the European Union is far more extensive and will, undoubtedly, be in the spotlight throughout the fi rst half of 2012! A modern state, where European and international sea routes converge, Denmark has frequently drawn on its talents and fl ourishing economy to make its own, distinctive mark. It is in tune with the priorities for 2020: competitiveness, social inclusion and the need for ecologically sustainable change.
  • 99. Møde Per Larsen (KF) Onsdag Den 21

    99. Møde Per Larsen (KF) Onsdag Den 21

    Onsdag den 21. april 2021 (D) 1 (Spm. nr. S 1325). 4) Til sundhedsministeren af: 99. møde Per Larsen (KF) Onsdag den 21. april 2021 kl. 13.00 Hvad er ministerens holdning til, at den nye vaccinationsplan i ud‐ gangspunktet ikke sikrer yngre personer med f.eks. alvorlige eller kroniske sygdomme, som nu må vente med at blive vaccineret, da Dagsorden man er gået over til at vaccinere efter alder? (Spm. nr. S 1326). 1) Besvarelse af oversendte spørgsmål til ministrene (spørgetid). (Se nedenfor). 5) Til sundhedsministeren af: Pernille Skipper (EL) 2) 1. behandling af lovforslag nr. L 194: Hvad kan ministeren oplyse om konsekvenserne for landets fødegan‐ Forslag til lov om ændring af lov om almene boliger m.v., lov om le‐ ge, hvis hver fjerde jordemoder vælger ikke at tage arbejde i den je af almene boliger og lov om leje. (Tidligere hårde ghettoområder, offentlige sektor, jf. artiklen »Mere end hver fjerde af landets jorde‐ som er omfattet af en udviklingsplan). mødre nægter at arbejde i den offentlige sektor« fra Berlingske den Af indenrigs- og boligministeren (Kaare Dybvad Bek). 8. april 2021, og hvad vil ministeren gøre for at forhindre, at et stort (Fremsættelse 24.03.2021). antal jordemødre fravælger at arbejde på landets fødegange på grund af de nuværende løn- og arbejdsvilkår? 3) Forhandling om redegørelse nr. R 13: (Spm. nr. S 1334). Udenrigsministerens redegørelse om udvalgte internationale organi‐ sationer (OSCE, Europarådet og Østersørådet). 6) Til sundhedsministeren af: (Anmeldelse 10.03.2021. Redegørelse givet 10.03.2021. Meddelelse Peter Juel-Jensen (V) om forhandling 10.03.2021).
  • Betænkning Over Forslag Til Lov Om Ændring Af Retsplejeloven

    Betænkning Over Forslag Til Lov Om Ændring Af Retsplejeloven

    Retsudvalget (2. samling) L 13 - Bilag 5 Offentligt Til lovforslag nr. L 13 Folketinget 2004 -05 (2. samling) Betænkning afgivet af Retsudvalget den 28 . april 2005 Betænkning over Forslag til lov om ændring af retsplejeloven (Underretnings - og formkrav ved justitsministerens pålæg til anklagemyndigheden i straff esager) [af justitsministeren (Lene Espersen)] 1. Ud valgsarbejdet Lovforslaget blev fremsat den 23. februar 2005 og var til 1. behandling den 3. marts 2005. Lo v- forslaget blev efter 1. behandling henvist til behandling i Retsudvalget . Tidligere behandling Lovforslaget er en genfremsættelse af lovforslag nr. L 146 fra folk etingsåret 2004-05, 1. samling. Møder Udvalget har behandlet lovforslaget i 3 møder. Høring Et udkast til lovforslaget har inden fremsættelsen været sendt i høring. Den 23. februar 2005 sen d- te justitsministeren de indkomne høringssvar samt et notat herom til udvalget. 2. Indstillinger og politiske bemærkninger Udvalget indstiller lovforslaget til vedtagelse uændret. Enhedslisten betragter forslaget, som jo oprindelig bygger på et beslutningsforslag fremsat af S o- cialistisk Folkeparti, Det Radik ale Venstre og Enhedslisten (B 46, folketingsåret 2003-04), som et lillebitte skridt i den rigtige retning hen imod en mere selvstændig anklagemyndighed. Men Enhed s- listen vil fortsat arbejde for en større og klarere adskillelse. Tjóðveldisflokkurin, Inuit Ataqatigiit, Siumut, og Fólkaflokkurin var på tidspunktet for betæn k- ningens afgivelse ikke repræsenteret med medlemmer i udvalget og havde dermed ikke adgang til at komme med indstillinger eller politiske udtalelser i betænkningen. En oversigt over Folketi ngets sammensætning er optrykt i betænkningen. 2 Birthe Rønn Hornbech (V) Michael Aastrup Jensen (V) Karsten Nonbo (V) Søren Pind (V) Peter Skaarup (DF) fmd.
  • Beretning Til Statsrevisorerne Om Adgangen Til It-Systemer, Der Under- Støtter Samfundsvigtige Opgaver

    Beretning Til Statsrevisorerne Om Adgangen Til It-Systemer, Der Under- Støtter Samfundsvigtige Opgaver

    Beretning til Statsrevisorerne om adgangen til it-systemer, der under- støtter samfundsvigtige opgaver Oktober 2015 BERETNING OM ADGANGEN TIL IT-SYSTEMER, DER UNDERSTØTTER SAMFUNDSVIGTIGE OPGAVER Indholdsfortegnelse 1. Introduktion og konklusion ............................................................................................ 1 1.1. Formål og konklusion ............................................................................................ 1 1.2. Baggrund .............................................................................................................. 3 1.3. Revisionskriterier, metode og afgrænsning .......................................................... 5 2. Styring, kontrol og logning af udvidede administratorrettigheder .................................. 8 2.1. Styring og kontrol af betroede it-medarbejderes udvidede administrator- rettigheder ............................................................................................................. 8 2.2. Styring og kontrol af udvidede administratorrettigheder for system- og servicekonti ......................................................................................................... 11 2.3. Sikring af logning af udvidede administratorrettigheder ...................................... 13 Bilag 1. Metode ................................................................................................................... 19 Bilag 2. Ordliste ..................................................................................................................
  • Betænkning Over Forslag Til Folketingsbeslutning Om Folkeafstemning Vedrørende Dansk Deltagelse I EU­Samarbejdet Om Asyl Og Indvandring

    Betænkning Over Forslag Til Folketingsbeslutning Om Folkeafstemning Vedrørende Dansk Deltagelse I EU­Samarbejdet Om Asyl Og Indvandring

    Udskriftsdato: 26. september 2021 2015/1 BTB 3 (Gældende) Betænkning over Forslag til folketingsbeslutning om folkeafstemning vedrørende dansk deltagelse i EU­samarbejdet om asyl og indvandring Ministerium: Folketinget Betænkning afgivet af Europaudvalget den 6. november 2015 Betænkning over Forslag til folketingsbeslutning om folkeafstemning vedrørende dansk deltagelse i EU-samarbejdet om asyl og indvandring [af Rasmus Nordqvist (ALT) m.fl.] 1. Udvalgsarbejdet Beslutningsforslaget blev fremsat den 7. oktober 2015 og var til 1. behandling den 20. oktober 2015. Beslutningsforslaget blev efter 1. behandling henvist til behandling i Europaudvalget. Møder Udvalget har behandlet beslutningsforslaget i 2 møder. Spørgsmål Udvalget har stillet 5 spørgsmål til udlændinge-, integrations- og boligministeren til skriftlig besvarel- se, som denne har besvaret. 2. Indstillinger og politiske bemærkninger Et flertal i udvalget (udvalget med undtagelse af EL og ALT) indstiller beslutningsforslaget til forkas- telse. Dansk Folkepartis medlemmer af udvalget bemærker, at forslagsstillerne med beslutningsforslaget øn- sker at pålægge regeringen at sikre, at den kommende folkeafstemning om omdannelse af retsforbeholdet til en tilvalgsordning omfatter spørgsmålet om Danmarks deltagelse i EU᾽s samarbejde om asyl og ind- vandring. Med lovforslag nr. L 29 om omdannelse af retsforbeholdet til en tilvalgsordning tilvejebringes imidlertid mulighed for, at et flertal i Folketinget allerede derved kan forpligte Danmark til at afgive suverænitet på asyl- og udlændingeområdet, som forslagsstillerne ønsker. Beslutningsforslaget er således med DF’s øjne overflødigt. DF ønsker ikke, at Danmark afgiver suverænitet på asyl- og udlændingeområdet og har af samme årsag anvist indgåelse af en parallelaftale eller anvendelse af en tilvalgsordning i begrænset form som alternativ til vedtagelse af lovforslag nr. L 29.
  • 1. Debbie Abrahams, Labour Party, United Kingdom 2

    1. Debbie Abrahams, Labour Party, United Kingdom 2

    1. Debbie Abrahams, Labour Party, United Kingdom 2. Malik Ben Achour, PS, Belgium 3. Tina Acketoft, Liberal Party, Sweden 4. Senator Fatima Ahallouch, PS, Belgium 5. Lord Nazir Ahmed, Non-affiliated, United Kingdom 6. Senator Alberto Airola, M5S, Italy 7. Hussein al-Taee, Social Democratic Party, Finland 8. Éric Alauzet, La République en Marche, France 9. Patricia Blanquer Alcaraz, Socialist Party, Spain 10. Lord John Alderdice, Liberal Democrats, United Kingdom 11. Felipe Jesús Sicilia Alférez, Socialist Party, Spain 12. Senator Alessandro Alfieri, PD, Italy 13. François Alfonsi, Greens/EFA, European Parliament (France) 14. Amira Mohamed Ali, Chairperson of the Parliamentary Group, Die Linke, Germany 15. Rushanara Ali, Labour Party, United Kingdom 16. Tahir Ali, Labour Party, United Kingdom 17. Mahir Alkaya, Spokesperson for Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation, Socialist Party, the Netherlands 18. Senator Josefina Bueno Alonso, Socialist Party, Spain 19. Lord David Alton of Liverpool, Crossbench, United Kingdom 20. Patxi López Álvarez, Socialist Party, Spain 21. Nacho Sánchez Amor, S&D, European Parliament (Spain) 22. Luise Amtsberg, Green Party, Germany 23. Senator Bert Anciaux, sp.a, Belgium 24. Rt Hon Michael Ancram, the Marquess of Lothian, Former Chairman of the Conservative Party, Conservative Party, United Kingdom 25. Karin Andersen, Socialist Left Party, Norway 26. Kirsten Normann Andersen, Socialist People’s Party (SF), Denmark 27. Theresa Berg Andersen, Socialist People’s Party (SF), Denmark 28. Rasmus Andresen, Greens/EFA, European Parliament (Germany) 29. Lord David Anderson of Ipswich QC, Crossbench, United Kingdom 30. Barry Andrews, Renew Europe, European Parliament (Ireland) 31. Chris Andrews, Sinn Féin, Ireland 32. Eric Andrieu, S&D, European Parliament (France) 33.
  • High-Level Statement1

    High-Level Statement1

    HIGH-LEVEL STATEMENT1 We made promises which we intend to keep. We promised that women and girls would be at the center of many of the Sustainable Development Goals which the world came together to agree in 2016. America’s Global Gag Rule breaks that promise as it has a chilling effect on health services for the world’s most vulnerable women and girls. It will imperil millions of women and girls’ lives by increasing unintended pregnancies and unsafe abortions. It will also reverse decades of progress on reproductive, maternal and child health by putting critical health and family planning services and supplies out of reach for those who most need them. There are currently 225 million women in developing countries who want to avoid pregnancy but are not using modern contraception. Maternal mortality is the second‐leading cause of death for girls aged 15 to 19 years old, and the burden of unsafe abortion also falls overwhelmingly on the poorest. The evidence shows that access to contraception is transformative for girls, women and their families and communities. It is linked to greater gender equality, educational attainment and economic development. Health providers around the world face a painful choice between losing their US funding and losing the freedom to offer a full range of reproductive health services. We’ve been here before. Since its inception in 1984, the Global Gag Rule has been put into place at the start of every Republican administration and promptly rescinded under each Democratic administration. It’s time to take politics out of gender rights.
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed

    ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed

    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
  • Liberal Parties in Europe and Human Rights Emphasis

    Liberal Parties in Europe and Human Rights Emphasis

    LIBERAL PARTIES IN EUROPE AND HUMAN RIGHTS EMPHASIS by ŞEYMA KOÇ Submitted to the Graduate School of Social Sciences in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Sabancı University August 2020 LIBERAL PARTIES IN EUROPE AND HUMAN RIGHTS EMPHASIS Approved by: Assoc. Prof Özge Kemahlıoğlu . (Thesis Supervisor) Prof. Ali Çarkoğlu . Asst. Prof. Mert Moral . Date of Approval: August 5, 2020 ŞEYMA KOÇ 2020 c All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT LIBERAL PARTIES IN EUROPE AND HUMAN RIGHTS EMPHASIS ŞEYMA KOÇ POLITICAL SCIENCE M.A. THESIS, AUGUST 2020 Thesis Supervisor: Assoc.Prof. Özge Kemahlıoğlu Keywords: Political Parties, Liberal Party Family, Human Rights Emphasis, Economic Conditions Liberal parties are mostly neglected by the literature on political parties despite their central role in establishing European liberal democracies. This thesis aims to contribute to the contemporary literature on liberal parties by examining 33 Eu- ropean democracies and covering a time period including observations of 75 years. The empirical analysis shows that liberal parties are distinguishable from the other party families on their emphasis on human rights and freedom. Then, this thesis investigates the impact of economic conditions on liberal parties’ relative emphasis on human rights and freedom. The findings illustrate that higher levels of unemploy- ment rate decrease liberal parties’ relative emphasis on human rights and freedom and increase their relative emphasis on economic issues. Its effect on the relative em- phasis on human rights and freedom issue and economic issues is substantive when the distributions of the dependent variables are considered. This finding may demon- strate the liberal parties’ responsiveness to changing needs of the electorate and a value change in politics too.
  • Pdf Dokument

    Pdf Dokument

    Udskriftsdato: 27. september 2021 2020/1 BTL 195 (Gældende) Betænkning over Forslag til lov om ændring af lov om ændring af straffeloven, retsplejeloven, lov om konkurrence­ og forbrugerforhold på telemarkedet, våbenloven, udleveringsloven samt lov om udlevering af lovovertrædere til Finland, Island, Norge og Sverige (Ændring af revisionsbestemmelse) Ministerium: Folketinget Betænkning afgivet af Retsudvalget den 20. maj 2021 Betænkning over Forslag til lov om ændring af lov om ændring af straffeloven, retsplejeloven, lov om konkurrence- og forbrugerforhold på telemarkedet, våbenloven, udleveringsloven samt lov om udlevering af lovovertrædere til Finland, Island, Norge og Sverige (Ændring af revisionsbestemmelse) [af justitsministeren (Nick Hækkerup)] 1. Indstillinger Et flertal i udvalget (S, V, KF, DF, NB, SIU, JF og Inger Støjberg (UFG)) indstiller lovforslaget til vedtagelse uændret. Et mindretal i udvalget (SF, EL, RV, KD og Sikandar Siddique (UFG)) indstiller lovforslaget til forkastelse ved 3. behandling. Et andet mindretal i udvalget (IA) vil ved 3. behandling stemme hverken for eller imod lovforslaget. Et tredje mindretal i udvalget (Simon Emil Ammitzbøll-Bille (UFG)) vil redegøre for sin stilling til lovforslaget ved 3. behandling. Liberal Alliance, Alternativet og Sambandsflokkurin havde ved betænkningsafgivelsen ikke medlem- mer i udvalget og dermed ikke adgang til at komme med indstillinger eller politiske bemærkninger i betænkningen. En oversigt over Folketingets sammensætning er optrykt i betænkningen. 2. Politiske bemærkninger Socialistisk Folkeparti Socialistisk Folkepartis medlemmer af udvalget bemærker, at SF ikke kan støtte forslaget om at udskyde revisionen af de ulovlige logningsregler. Det er regler, som vi siden 2016 har vidst er i strid med EU-retten, fordi generel og udifferentieret logning udgør et indgreb navnlig i retten til respekt for privatli- vet og til beskyttelse af personoplysninger.
  • Betænkning Over Forslag Til Lov Om Ændring Af Værnepligtsloven (Fritagelse for Værnepligtstjeneste for Visse Personer, Der Er Blevet Udskrevet Til Tjeneste Før 2010)

    Betænkning Over Forslag Til Lov Om Ændring Af Værnepligtsloven (Fritagelse for Værnepligtstjeneste for Visse Personer, Der Er Blevet Udskrevet Til Tjeneste Før 2010)

    Udskriftsdato: 27. september 2021 2018/1 BTL 4 (Gældende) Betænkning over Forslag til lov om ændring af værnepligtsloven (Fritagelse for værnepligtstjeneste for visse personer, der er blevet udskrevet til tjeneste før 2010) Ministerium: Folketinget Betænkning afgivet af Forsvarsudvalget den 22. november 2018 Betænkning over Forslag til lov om ændring af værnepligtsloven (Fritagelse for værnepligtstjeneste for visse personer, der er blevet udskrevet til tjeneste før 2010) [af forsvarsministeren (Claus Hjort Frederiksen)] 1. Indstilling Udvalget indstiller lovforslaget til vedtagelse uændret. Nunatta Qitornai, Tjóðveldi og Javnaðarflokkurin havde ved betænkningsafgivelsen ikke medlemmer i udvalget og dermed ikke adgang til at komme med indstillinger eller politiske bemærkninger i betænknin- gen. En oversigt over Folketingets sammensætning er optrykt i betænkningen. 2. Politiske bemærkninger Enhedslisten og Inuit Ataqatigiit Enhedslistens og Inuit Ataqatigiits medlemmer af udvalget bemærker, at der er en principiel udfordring i, at regeringen fremsætter ændringslovforslag til en lov, der gælder i hele rigsfællesskabet. Det fremgår i høringsoversigten, at regeringen har til hensigt at udarbejde en kongelig anordning for Grønland og Færøerne senere. Når dette sker, vil Inatsisartut komme med en udtalelse, jf. selvstyreloven, men det er uskøn proces, når der er tale om en lov, der omhandler hele rigsfællesskabet, som ændres i forskellige tempi, afhængigt af hvor i rigsfællesskabet man som borger befinder sig. 3. Udvalgsarbejdet Lovforslaget blev fremsat den 3. oktober 2018 og var til 1. behandling den 11. oktober 2018. Lovfor- slaget blev efter 1. behandling henvist til behandling i Forsvarsudvalget. Oversigt over lovforslagets sagsforløb og dokumenter Lovforslaget og dokumenterne i forbindelse med udvalgsbehandlingen kan læses under lovforslaget på Folketingets hjemmeside www.ft.dk.