DOCSLIB.ORG

Window to the Inner Workings of The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Window to the Inner Workings of The A WINDOW INTO THE INNER WORKINGS OF THE UNITED STATES SUSAN LINDAUER AND THE SECRET GOVERNMENT Come Carpentier de Gourdon The “mysteries” surrounding the September 11th, 2001 attacks and many other momentous events in modern American history seem to be bottomless. After so many layers have been peeled, one sees that so many more remain. Many insufficiently informed people think that those who believe in “conspiracy theories” fail to explain why no insider from the US supposedly democratic government has come out to expose the lies propagated by the successive administrations. Skeptics also wonder why the surviving victims of the 911 attacks and their families seem to meekly accept the official version instead of challenging it, on the basis of the obvious inconsistencies and impossibilities that detractors have pointed out almost since that tragic day. Let us clarify that both those objections are invalid because they are wrong. Several people working inside the US Government at various levels –including, exceptionally military officers - have spoken out against their superiors on the truth behind those terrible events, at great personal cost and risk and numerous relatives of 911 victims have joined legal and public awareness campaigns to expose the truth. Others however accepted substantial financial rewards as a price for their silence and a few have died in suspicious circumstances after being too outspoken and affirmative in their conviction that the WTC had been destroyed by controlled demolition. No single source of information on the conspiracy of 911 seems to possess all the facts, as can be logically expected in view of the systematic compartmentalization of information on the “Need to Know” basis practiced by the government, all the more so in its clandestine agencies. We are hence forced to build a puzzle with many separate pieces and some of the most valuable and impressive ones are provided by Susan Lindauer, daughter of a Republican candidate for the Governorship of her native Alaska, a cousin of President G W Bush’s Chief of Staff, Andy Card, who was employed as an asset by both the CIA and the DIA (Defence Intelligence Agency) for nine years, up to September 2011 and as a backchannel to Iraq and Libya following the first Gulf War. Her account, which she had to wait ten years to publish in her book “Extreme Prejudice – The Terrifying Story of the Patriot Act and the Cover Ups of 911 and Iraq” (2010), reads in part like a detective thriller and it also plants one more nail, after so many, into the coffin of so-called “American democracy”. Susan Lindauer, a former Reporter and Press Secretary and Speech writer to Senator Moseley Braun of Illinois with an MS from the London School of Economics, reported to her CIA “handler”, a rather well known figure in the shadowy area where business and espionage overlap. Richard Fuisz, MD, a millionaire of Slovenian-American origin holds the rank of Lt-Commander in the US Navy and is known to be a CIA agent. He is also rumoured to work for the Mossad as a Sayan (plant and informant) like many other high- ranking members of the American Intelligence community and is an inventor holding some 200 patents. Among the companies he founded is Fuizs Tobacco, Fuisz Technology, Medcom, Kosmos Pharma and a Russian modeling agency (in partnership with subsequently jailed Israeli-Russian oligarch Mikhail Khodorkovsky, of Yukos fame). That agency, which he later sold to a larger one, specialized in bringing Russian models to America. Fuisz was also an active monitor of US companies on behalf of the Israeli government, tracking down those that in any way violated the stringent US laws against boycott of Israeli goods. When he sold Medcom to Baxter Pharmaceutical in 1981, he became the head of the company’s operations in Syria and at the same time reportedly the top US CIA agent in Damascus. After being recalled and “fired” by Baxter in 1985 he reported the company for violating the stringent US legislation against companies boycotting Israel. His testimony led to Baxter being fined 6,5 millions in 1993 for collaborating with Syria. Later he also accused Terex, another US firm of selling components for Scud missiles to Iraq, a charge which could not be proven at the time. Fuisz was allegedly put in charge of the back channel that the Clinton Administration had opened with Saddam Hussain’s government in 1997 when the US sanctions regime, which had already brought about the deaths of over one million Iraqis, half of them children, was generating a growing backlash around the world. By then Baghdad had already destroyed all its “weapons of mass destruction” but Washington was unwilling to lift the sanctions for reasons that will be made clearer in the course of this article, and the CIA was working behind the scene to leverage the US stranglehold over Iraq into highly lucrative benefits for the American economy. Susan Lindauer, as a NOC (Non Official Cover agent) was Fuisz’s envoy and spokesperson at the Iraqi and Libyan diplomatic missions to the UN in New York and over the years she developed a good personal rapport with her contacts. On behalf of the CIA she was able to secure a smorgasbord of appealing concessions from Baghdad for the US corporate sector. According to her testimony for which there are numerous corroborations, by December 2000, Saddam Hussain’s government had agreed to give American companies an almost unlimited access to the Iraqi market, especially in the priority areas of oil and gas exploration and development, telecommunications, air and road infrastructure and transportation, heavy industry, healthcare and pharmaceuticals. Iraq was willing to commit to buy one million American cars a year for ten years and also provide full access to the FBI on its soil so as to enable the USA to carry out the anti- terrorist struggle with its cooperation. The initial sign of Baghdad’s commitment was to invite in the UN weapons inspectors so that they might complete their report and confirm that there were no more WMD stocks in the country. In a sentence, Saddam Hussain was apparently willing to become a new Saudi Arabia, a client state of Uncle Sam in the Middle East. As one who went to Iraq several times in the mid-nineties for work-related reasons, I can confirm that Saddam’s government desperately wanted to make peace with the USA in order to have the punishing sanctions lifted, realising that Washington DC alone had the power to remove them, since other western countries were behaving as American satellites devoid of any real autonomy in the matter. By February 2001, always monitored by Fuizs, Lindauer had a confirmation that Baghdad was ready to invite the FBI on its soil to start formal cooperation in the anti- terrorist struggle but by then the new Republican administration of George W Bush was in place and, contrary to Clinton, who had resisted, if mainly through inertia, the pressing calls of the Neo-Conservative Faction, led by Norman Podhoretz, Elliot Abrams, Paul Wolfovitz, Bill Kristol and Richard Perle to attack Iraq, the new tenant of the White House had a personal grudge against Saddam Hussain, accused of having tried to kill his father and he also wanted to increase his stature by becoming a victorious war president. He was hence ready to listen to the “Vulcans” in his Party who were baying for blood. Richard Fuisz also appeared to Lindauer increasingly ill disposed towards Iraq, whereas he was on the contrary seemingly favourable to Qaddafi’s Libya as he claimed to have proof of Libya’s innocence in the 1988 Lockerbie bombing plot and even had offered some years earlier to testify in favour of the two Libyan agents Fhima and Megrahi accused of planting the bomb on Pan Am Flight 103. For that reason, Fuisz had been placed under a permanent gag order by a US Court in 1994 with a ten year prison sentence if he broke it. The government’s concern is that he would “reveal information damaging to the national security and military interests of the United States”. Fuisz told Lindauer that he could “confirm absolutely that no Libyan national was involved in planning or executing the bombing of PanAm 103” and further that “could identify who orchestrated and executed the bombing”. Although this is another story, Fuisz’s allegation corroborates the circumstantial evidence pointing to a shadowy Palestinian terrorist cell located in Syria as probable executor of the PanAm bombing on behalf of Iran which was seeking revenge for the destruction of its own airliner by an American missile in the Persian Gulf during the Iran-Iraq war some years earlier. In the early nineties however the Americans needed the cooperation of Syria and Iran for success in their first war against Iraq and their Intelligence community accordingly decided to shift the blame for the bombing to Libya which had taken Saddam’s side. Another reason for the obvious US cover up is that the perpetrator was known to be a Palestinian “rogue” unit thoroughly infiltrated and controlled by the CIA and the Mossad. There are thus reasons to believe that the US might have tacitly agreed to let the terrorists have their way with Flight 103 in exchange for an agreement that this would be the last retaliation for America’s own terrorist strike against Iranian civilians. In 2007, accordingly, the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission ruled that “exculpatory evidence for Megrahi had been suppressed at the trial” which was “a miscarriage of justice”. The knowledge at high levels that the Libyans were innocent of Lockerbie led the Scottish government to release him on “compassionate grounds” in 2010, reportedly in exchange for some attractive oil deals in Libya for British Petroleum.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Extreme Prejudice, by Susan Lindauer
    Extreme Prejudice, by Susan Lindauer A review, and important substantive selections Dick Atlee, 30 May 2013 (http://dickatlee.com/issues/911/lindauer_extreme_prejudice.html) (Lindauer site/blog -- http://extremeprejudiceusa.wordpress.com/) "Extreme Prejudice" as a military/intelligence term refers to a person marked for destruction, a usage not inappropriate here. Susan Lindauer, the second cousin -- and eventual victim -- of George W. Bush's chief-of-staff Andrew Card (and others), is an anti-war and anti-Iraq-sanctions activist. Bur she was also the "backdoor" intelligence Asset for the U.S. government, under handlers from the CIA and Defense Intelligence Agency, for communication with the Libyan government regarding the Lockerbie plane bombing (they didn't do it), and with the Iraqi government in the year prior to 9/11 and in the lead-up to the Iraq War. She had come to the intelligence community's attention for having earlier passed on a warning -- unheeded -- about the 1993 WTC bombing. Throughout 2001 she personally communicated to the Bush administration a series of increasingly specific and frantic intelligence warnings about an impending attack in NYC involving hijacked airplanes and the World Trade Center. She was also the backdoor negotiator with the Iraqi regime over "WMDs," and had managed to obtain Iraq agreement with all U.S. demands, only to have that agreement ignored and suppressed by an administration intent on war. Angered by the administration's and Republican leadership's subsequent attempts to blame 9/11 and the eventual Iraq quagmire on the failure of the intelligence community to provide adequate intelligence, she went to Congress to lay out what she knew, and was promptly arrested, accused of being an Iraqi spy, and eventually sent to prison for "psychiatric evaluation" and an attempt at stereotypically Stalinist forced drugging.
    [Show full text]
  • Theranos As a Legal Ethics Case Study
    Vanderbilt University Law School Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications Faculty Scholarship 2021 How and Why Did It Go So Wrong?: Theranos as a Legal Ethics Case Study G. S. Hans Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/faculty-publications Part of the Legal Education Commons, and the Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons DATE DOWNLOADED: Mon May 24 12:25:08 2021 SOURCE: Content Downloaded from HeinOnline Citations: Bluebook 21st ed. G. S. Hans, How and Why Did It Go So Wrong?: Theranos as a Legal Ethics Case Study, 37 GA. St. U. L. REV. 427 (2021). ALWD 6th ed. Hans, G. G., How and why did it go so wrong?: Theranos as a legal ethics case study, 37(2) Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 427 (2021). APA 7th ed. Hans, G. G. (2021). How and why did it go so wrong?: Theranos as legal ethics case study. Georgia State University Law Review, 37(2), 427-470. Chicago 17th ed. G. S. Hans, "How and Why Did It Go So Wrong?: Theranos as a Legal Ethics Case Study," Georgia State University Law Review 37, no. 2 (Winter 2021): 427-470 McGill Guide 9th ed. G S Hans, "How and Why Did It Go So Wrong?: Theranos as a Legal Ethics Case Study" (2021) 37:2 Ga St U L Rev 427. AGLC 4th ed. G S Hans, 'How and Why Did It Go So Wrong?: Theranos as a Legal Ethics Case Study' (2021) 37(2) Georgia State University Law Review 427. MLA 8th ed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Law of Mental Illness
    DEVELOPMENTS IN THE LAW THE LAW OF MENTAL ILLNESS “[D]oing time in prison is particularly difficult for prisoners with men- tal illness that impairs their thinking, emotional responses, and ability to cope. They have unique needs for special programs, facilities, and extensive and varied health services. Compared to other prisoners, moreover, prisoners with mental illness also are more likely to be ex- ploited and victimized by other inmates.” HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH, ILL-EQUIPPED: U.S. PRISONS AND OFFENDERS WITH MENTAL ILLNESS 2 (2003), available at http://www.hrw.org/reports/2003/usa1003/usa1003.pdf. “[I]ndividuals with disabilities are a discrete and insular minority who have been faced with restrictions and limitations, subjected to a history of purposeful unequal treatment, and relegated to a position of political powerlessness in our society, based on characteristics that are beyond the control of such individuals and resulting from stereotypic assumptions not truly indicative of the individual ability of such indi- viduals to participate in, and contribute to, society . .” Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101-336, § 2(a)(7), 104 Stat. 327, 329 (codified at 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (2000)). “We as a Nation have long neglected the mentally ill . .” Remarks [of President John F. Kennedy] on Proposed Measures To Combat Mental Illness and Mental Retardation, PUB. PAPERS 137, 138 (Feb. 5, 1963). “[H]umans are composed of more than flesh and bone . [M]ental health, just as much as physical health, is a mainstay of life.” Madrid v. Gomez, 889 F. Supp. 1146, 1261 (N.D. Cal.
    [Show full text]
  • Biovail Corporation U.S.$300,000,000 6.75% Convertible Subordinated Preferred Equivalent Debentures Due March 31, 2025 (U.S.$50 Principal Amount Per Security)
    Prospectus March 17, 2000 Biovail Corporation U.S.$300,000,000 6.75% Convertible Subordinated Preferred Equivalent Debentures due March 31, 2025 (U.S.$50 principal amount per security) The Company: · Interest Deferral Option: we have the right, at any time · We are an international, fully-integrated pharmaceutical and from time to time, to defer payment of interest on company that specializes in the development, the Securities by extending the interest payment period manufacture, marketing and licensing of drugs utilizing up to 20 consecutive quarters. advanced controlled-release, rapid dissolve, enhanced · Conversion Price: U.S.$60.675 per common share (equal absorption and taste masking technologies. to an initial conversion ratio of .8241 common shares per Security, subject to adjustment). · Biovail Corporation 2488 Dunwin Drive · Conversion Right: convertible at any time into our Mississauga, Ontario common shares at the applicable conversion price. Canada L5L 1J9 · Optional Redemption: beginning on March 31, 2003, we (416) 285-6000 may redeem the Securities, in whole or in part, at any time (except during an interest deferral period) at the · NYSE and TSE symbol for our common shares: BVF redemption prices stated herein, plus accrued and unpaid The Offering: interest. · Special Redemption: we may redeem the Securities, in · The Convertible Subordinated Preferred Equivalent whole or in part, at a redemption price of 106.75%, plus Debentures (the ``Securities'') are convertible accrued and unpaid interest, at any time and from time subordinated debentures bearing an interest rate, payable to time (except during an interest deferral period) prior in U.S. dollars, of 6.75% per year.
    [Show full text]
  • The Midwest 9/11 Truth Conference, 2013 Event Videos Now on Youtube
    This version of Total HTML Converter is unregistered. NewsFollowup Franklin Scandal Omaha Sitemap Obama Comment Search Pictorial index home Midwest 9/11 Truth Go to Midwest 9/11 Truth Conference The Midwest 9/11 Truth Conference 2014 page Architects & Engineers Conference, 2013 for 9/11 Truth Mini / Micro Nukes 9/11 Truth links Event videos now on YouTube, World911Truth Cheney, Planning and Decision Aid System speakers: Sonnenfeld Video of 9/11 Ground Zero Victims and Rescuers Wayne Madsen , Investigative Journalist, and 9/11 Whistleblowers AE911Truth James Fetzer, Ph.D., Founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth Ed Asner Contact: Steve Francis Compare competing Kevin Barrett, co-founder Muslim Jewish Christian Alliance for 9/11 Truth [email protected] theories The Midwest 9/11 Truth Conference 2014 is now in the planning stages. Top 9/11 Documentaries US/British/Saudi/Zionists Research Speakers: The Midwest 9/11 Wayne Madsen Truth Conference Jim Fetzer Wayne Madsen is a Washington, DC-based investigative James H. Fetzer, a former Marine Corps officer, is This version of Total HTML Converter is unregistered. journalist, author and columnist. He has written for The Village Distinguished McKnight Professor Emeritus on the Duluth Voice, The Progressive, Counterpunch, Online Journal, campus of the University of Minnesota. A magna cum CorpWatch, Multinational Monitor, News Insider, In These laude in philosophy graduate of Princeton University in Times, and The American Conservative. His columns have 1962, he was commissioned as a 2nd Lieutenant and appeared in The Miami Herald, Houston Chronicle, became an artillery officer who served in the Far East. Philadelphia Inquirer, Columbus Dispatch, Sacramento Bee, After a tour supervising recruit training in San Diego, he and Atlanta Journal-Constitution, among others.
    [Show full text]
  • Navigating Troubled Waters a History of Commercial Fishing in Glacier Bay, Alaska
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Glacier Bay National Park and Preserve Navigating Troubled Waters A History of Commercial Fishing in Glacier Bay, Alaska Author: James Mackovjak National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Glacier Bay National Park and Preserve “If people want both to preserve the sea and extract the full benefit from it, they must now moderate their demands and structure them. They must put aside ideas of the sea’s immensity and power, and instead take stewardship of the ocean, with all the privileges and responsibilities that implies.” —The Economist, 1998 Navigating Troubled Waters: Part 1: A History of Commercial Fishing in Glacier Bay, Alaska Part 2: Hoonah’s “Million Dollar Fleet” U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Glacier Bay National Park and Preserve Gustavus, Alaska Author: James Mackovjak 2010 Front cover: Duke Rothwell’s Dungeness crab vessel Adeline in Bartlett Cove, ca. 1970 (courtesy Charles V. Yanda) Back cover: Detail, Bartlett Cove waters, ca. 1970 (courtesy Charles V. Yanda) Dedication This book is dedicated to Bob Howe, who was superintendent of Glacier Bay National Monument from 1966 until 1975 and a great friend of the author. Bob’s enthusiasm for Glacier Bay and Alaska were an inspiration to all who had the good fortune to know him. Part 1: A History of Commercial Fishing in Glacier Bay, Alaska Table of Contents List of Tables vi Preface vii Foreword ix Author’s Note xi Stylistic Notes and Other Details xii Chapter 1: Early Fishing and Fish Processing in Glacier Bay 1 Physical Setting 1 Native Fishing 1 The Coming of Industrial Fishing: Sockeye Salmon Attract Salters and Cannerymen to Glacier Bay 4 Unnamed Saltery at Bartlett Cove 4 Bartlett Bay Packing Co.
    [Show full text]
  • This Post As Tangentially Related to Leveymg's Most Excellent Recent Diary
    This post as tangentially related to leveymg's most excellent recent diary "Larger CIA and DoD Privatization Scandal Emerging from Walter Reed Story, US Attorneys Firing" which centers around hedge fund giant Cerberus. If you haven't had a chance to check that diary out, be sure to do so because it is a very worthwhile read. In this diary, we're going to delve into the intertwined, and quite convoluted scandals involving, among st other things: - Alleged bribes to Ariel Sharon by Martin Schlaff, an Austrian industrialist, that were used to pay back illegal campaign contributions Sharon used in 1999. - The scandalous collapse of Refco, the commodity futures giant, and the related collapse of BAWAG, one of Austria's largest banks (Cerberus recently bought BAWAG, BTW). - Martin Schlaff's investment in Yasser Arafat's "Oasis Casino", and that casino was tied into by the BAWAG/Refco scandals AND Ariel Sharon's right-hand-man Dov Weissman. - Martin Schlaff's and George "Macaca" Allen's involvement with the "Xybernaut" pump-and-dump stock fraud. - Martin Schlaff's apparent financier of far-Right Israeli politician Avigdor Lieberman - and finally, the potential for a crisis in Israel's democracy due to endemic corruption, and the chilling figures that could take advantage of such a crisis. Get to know your BAWAG So, let's get started with a look at the BAWAG scandal that rocked Austria's politics: Austrian Bank Scandal: When Socialists Play With Money From the desk of Chris Gillibrand on Tue, 2006-04-04 22:53 A major banking scandal is rocking the Austrian political elites – left and right.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrorism: a False Threat
    TERRORISM: A FALSE THREAT John Scales Avery December 15, 2019 Introduction Terrorism, a pseudothreat This book consists mainly of chapters and articles that I have previously pub- lished, although a considerable amount of new material has been added. The book deals with the terrible consequences of the so-called “War on Terror” which followed the 9/11 attacks. Is the threat of terrorism real? Or is it like the barking of a dog driving a herd? The threat of catastrophic climate change is very real indeed. The threat to future global food security is real too. Already 11 million children die every year from malnutrition and poverty-related causes. The threat to human civilization and the biosphere posed by a possible Third World War is real. The threat of exhaustion of non-renewable resources and economic collapse is real. The dangers associated with our unstable fractional reserve banking system are also real. Beside these all too real threats to our future, the threat of terrorism is vanishingly small. Millions starve. Millions die yearly from preventable diseases. Millions die as a consequence of wars. Compared with these numbers, the total count of terrorist victims is vanishingly small. It is even invisible compared with the number of people killed yearly in automobile accidents. The official story of 9/11 is untrue There is strong evidence, available to everyone who is willing to look at it on the Internet, which shows that the official version of 9/11 is untrue, and that the US government made the disaster worse than it otherwise would have been in order to justify not only an unending “War on Terror”, but also the abridgement of civil liberties within the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Radical Road Maps
    RADICAL ROAD MAPS JamesJames H.H. HansenHansen RADICAL ROAD MAPS Uncovering the Web of Connections Among Far-Left Groups in America WND BOOKS AN IMPRINT OF CUMBERLAND HOUSE PUBLISHING, INC. NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE RADICAL ROAD MAPS A WND BOOK PUBLISHED BY CUMBERLAND HOUSE PUBLISHING, INC. 431 Harding Industrial Drive Nashville, Tennessee 37211 Copyright © 2006 by James H. Hansen All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher, except for brief quotations in critical reviews and articles. Cover design by Linda Daly Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Hansen, James H. Radical road maps : uncovering the web of connections among far-left groups in America / James Hansen. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN-13: 978-1-58182-530-5 (hardcover : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 1-58182-530-7 (hardcover : alk. paper) 1. Radicalism—United States. 2. Left-wing extremists—United States. I. Title. HN90.R3H37 2006 320.530973—dc22 2005032881 Printed in the United States of America 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10—10 09 08 07 06 CONTENTS Introduction 7 List of Abbreviations 13 1 What’s at Stake Now 21 2 Lessons from the Cold War 37 3 It Has All Happened Before 59 4 Get the Right Tools 81 5 Groups, Leaders, and Their Linkages: Before 1960 93 6 Groups, Leaders, and Their Linkages: 1960–99 113 7 Groups, Leaders, and Their Linkages: 2000–Present 153 8 In Step with Other Institutions 169 9 What They Say and Carry 195 10 Losing the Compass: Episodes from John Kerry’s Career 205 11 The Road Ahead 211 Conclusion 233 Appendix: Outrageous Quotations 241 Notes 247 Bibliography 271 Index 275 INTRODUCTION HIS BOOK EXAMINES THE significant groups of the Far Left in America Ttoday and discusses how they connect and interact, how they oper- ate, what they profess, and why this matters.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Utah V. Wanda Eileen Barzee : Brief of Appellant Utah Court of Appeals
    Brigham Young University Law School BYU Law Digital Commons Utah Court of Appeals Briefs 2006 State of Utah v. Wanda Eileen Barzee : Brief of Appellant Utah Court of Appeals Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/byu_ca2 Part of the Law Commons Original Brief Submitted to the Utah Court of Appeals; digitized by the Howard W. Hunter Law Library, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah; machine-generated OCR, may contain errors. Christine Soltis; Assistant Attorney General; Attorneys for State of Utah. David V. Finlayson; Scott .C Williams; Jennifer K. Gowans; Randall K. Spencer; Fillmore Spencer, LLC; Attorneys for Wanda Eileen Barzee. Christine Soltis (3039) Assistant Attorney General Appeals Division 160 East 300 South 6th Floor P.O. Box 140854 Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-0854 Attorneys for State of Utah David V. Finlayson (6540) Scott .C Williams (6687) 43 East 400 South Saltlakr Citv.Uta! 1 Jennifer K. Gowans (7538) Randall K. Spencer (6992) Fillmore Spencer, LLC 3301 North University Avenue Provo, Utah 84604 Attorneys for Wanda Eileen Barzee Recommended Citation Brief of Appellant, Utah v. Barzee, No. 20060627 (Utah Court of Appeals, 2006). https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/byu_ca2/6670 This Brief of Appellant is brought to you for free and open access by BYU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Utah Court of Appeals Briefs by an authorized administrator of BYU Law Digital Commons. Policies regarding these Utah briefs are available at http://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/utah_court_briefs/policies.html. Please contact the Repository Manager at [email protected] with questions or feedback.
    [Show full text]
  • David Boies, Esq. BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 333
    Case4:11-cv-05236-YGR Document84 Filed07/17/12 Page1 of 26 1 David Boies, Esq. BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 2 333 Main Street Armonk, N.Y. 10504 3 Telephone: (914) 749-8200 Facsimile: (914) 749-8300 4 Email: [email protected] (admitted pro hac vice) 5 David W. Shapiro, Esq., SBN 219265 6 BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 1999 Harrison Street, Suite 900 7 Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: (510) 874-1000 8 Facsimile: (510) 874-1460 Email: [email protected] 9 10 Counsel for Plaintiffs, 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 OAKLAND DIVISION 14 P L L 15 R CASE NO.: CV-11-5236-YGR E N X THERANOS, INC. and ELIZABETH E L F 16 HOLMES, & SECOND AMENDED R E L COMPLAINT AND L I 17 Plaintiffs, H C JURY DEMAND S , S E 18 v. I O B 19 FUISZ PHARMA LLC, RICHARD C. 20 FUISZ, and JOSEPH M. FUISZ, 21 Defendants. 22 23 24 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 25 Plaintiffs Theranos, Inc. (“Theranos”) and Elizabeth Holmes, by and 26 through their undersigned counsel, state, with knowledge of their own acts and 27 status and acts taking place in their presence, and upon information and belief as 28 to all other matters, as follows: 1 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND Case No.: CV-11-05236-YGR Case4:11-cv-05236-YGR Document84 Filed07/17/12 Page2 of 26 1 Nature of the Action 2 1. This is an action for damages and equitable relief arising from the 3 wrongful conduct of Defendants Fuisz Pharma LLC, Richard C.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents ‐ Explanatory Notes ‐ Document 1: Letter from Defence
    Contents ‐ Explanatory notes ‐ Document 1: Letter from defence solicitor Eddie MacKechnie to Brian Murtagh of the US Department of Justice, 31 May 2000 ‐ Document 2: Letter from Murtagh to MacKechnie, 12 July 2000 ‐ Document 3: Letter from MacKechnie to Murtagh, 25 August 2000 ‐ Document 4: Letter from Murtagh to MacKechnie, 28 August 2000 ‐ Document 5: Letter from MacKechnie to Murtagh, 8 September 2000 ‐ Document 6: Letter from Robert J Eatinger, CIA Office of General Counsel to Murtagh, 12 October 2000 ‐ Document 7: Letter from Eatinger to Richard Fuisz, 13 October 2000 ‐ Document 8: Defence lawyer’s note of Fuisz’s first sworn deposition 6 December 2000 ‐ Document 9 Transcript of Fuisz’s second sworn deposition Explanatory notes Dr Richard Fuisz’s was an international businessman and deep‐cover CIA spy, who worked in the USSR and across the Middle East during the Eighties and Nineties. As well as having a very successful medical technology company, he ran training programmes for the Saudi military, supplied computers with a secret spying capability to the unwitting Soviets (via Raisa Gorbachev) and had a model agency that supplied the first Miss USSR. In May 2000, not long after the start of the Lockerbie trial, the defence lawyers got wind of Fuisz, via an associate of his, Susan Lindauer, who said that he had been based in Syria in 1988 and had irrefutable intelligence that Lockerbie was the work of the PFLP‐GC. Lindauer also said that he was the subject of a gagging order, a breach of which would result in a significant prison sentence.
    [Show full text]