DOCSLIB.ORG

Apache Canyon Fence and Wildlife Guzzler Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-NM-L000-2016-0137-EA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Apache Canyon Fence and Wildlife Guzzler Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-NM-L000-2016-0137-EA U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management March 2017 Apache Canyon Fence and Wildlife Guzzler Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-NM-L000-2016-0137-EA Sierra County, New Mexico /s/ Jesse Bergloff, Rangeland Management Specialist 3/27/2017 Signature and Title of Project Lead Date /s/ Ikumi Doucette 3/14/2017 Signature of Planning & Environmental Coordinator Date Las Cruces District Office 1800 Marquess Street Las Cruces, New Mexico 88005 575-525-4300 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................... 1 1.1. Purpose and Need for Action ........................................................................................... 1 1.2. Decision to be Made ......................................................................................................... 1 1.3. Plan Conformance ............................................................................................................ 1 1.4. Scoping and Issues ........................................................................................................... 2 1.4.1. Internal Scoping ........................................................................................................ 2 1.4.2. External Scoping ....................................................................................................... 2 1.4.3. Issues ......................................................................................................................... 2 CHAPTER 2. PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES .......................................... 5 2.1. Proposed Action ............................................................................................................... 5 2.1.1. Design Features ......................................................................................................... 8 2.2. No Action Alternative ...................................................................................................... 9 CHAPTER 3. AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ... 9 3.1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 9 3.2. Cumulative Actions .......................................................................................................... 9 3.2.1. Past and Present Actions ........................................................................................... 9 3.2.2. Reasonably Foreseeable Future Actions ................................................................... 9 3.3. Issue 1: How would construction of the proposed wildlife guzzler and fence impact vegetation? ................................................................................................................................ 10 3.3.1. Affected Environment ............................................................................................. 10 3.3.2. Environmental Impacts ........................................................................................... 11 3.3.2.1. Impacts of the Proposed Action ....................................................................... 11 3.3.2.2. Impacts of the No Action Alternative .............................................................. 12 3.4. Issue 2: How would the proposed fence influence grazing distribution? ..................... 12 3.4.1. Affected Environment ............................................................................................. 12 3.4.2. Environmental Impacts ........................................................................................... 14 3.4.2.1. Impacts of the Proposed Action ....................................................................... 14 3.4.2.2. Impacts of No Action Alternative ................................................................... 14 3.5. Issue 3: What would be the effects of the projects on special status species habitat? .. 14 3.5.1. Affected Environment ............................................................................................. 14 3.5.2. Environmental Impacts ........................................................................................... 15 3.5.2.1. Impacts of the Proposed Action ....................................................................... 15 3.5.2.2. Impacts of No Action Alternative ................................................................... 15 Apache Canyon Fence and Wildlife Guzzler Environmental Assessment i March 2017 3.6. Issue 4: How does providing permanent water in the Caballo Mountains improve habitat for desert bighorn sheep? .............................................................................................. 15 3.6.1. Affected Environment ............................................................................................. 15 3.6.2. Environmental Impacts ........................................................................................... 16 3.6.2.1. Impacts of the Proposed Action ....................................................................... 16 3.6.2.2. Impacts of the No Action Alternative .............................................................. 17 CHAPTER 4. CONSULTATION AND COORDINATION .............................................. 17 CHAPTER 5. LIST OF PREPARERS................................................................................. 17 CHAPTER 6. REFERENCES .............................................................................................. 18 TABLES Table 1-1. Issues Identified for Detailed Analysis......................................................................... 2 Table 1-2. Issues Not Included in Further Detail in the Environmental Assessment ........... Error! Bookmark not defined. Table 5-1. Identifies the BLM staff consulted in the preparation of this EA .............................. 17 APPENDICIES APPENDIX A - List and Description of BLM Sensitive Species and Bird Species of Conservation Concern Occurring in the Project Area………………………………………… A-1 Apache Canyon Fence and Wildlife Guzzler Environmental Assessment ii March 2017 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION This environmental assessment is being prepared to address a proposed fence and wildlife watering facility or guzzler, on the Apache Canyon Allotment No. 16023. The Apache Canyon Allotment is located in Sierra County, New Mexico and is approximately 18 miles south of Truth or Consequences or approximately 52 miles north of Las Cruces. The allotment totals 15,036 acres with 12,135 acres of public land, 2,267 acres of state land, 160 acres of deeded land, 384 acres of uncontrolled private, and 90 acres of Bureau of Reclamation. A Coordinated Resource Management Plan (CRMP) was developed between Duane Woods, the permittee, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), the Caballo Soil and Water Conservation District, the New Mexico State Land Office, and the New Mexico Association of Conservation Districts (NMACD). The plan outlined the opportunity to combine efforts and resources from the land management agencies with the overall goal of improving the productivity of rangeland resources through implementation of proposed conservation practices. 1.1. Purpose and Need for Action The purpose of the proposed action is to facilitate better livestock management practices on the allotment and provide water for wildlife, specifically bighorn sheep. The proposed action is needed to provide increased options for livestock rotation and grazing deferment. Additionally, the action is needed to: provide water on a consistent dependable basis to benefit wildlife in the arid habitat of the Caballo Mountains; keep bighorn sheep out of flats/terraces and away from watering sources utilized by livestock to reduce exposure to disease and predation; reduce potential for forage competition between livestock and bighorn sheep by locating water higher up on hills/backslopes; and keep bighorn sheep away from the interstate to reduce both sheep and human injury/mortality. 1.2. Decision to be Made The decision to be made by the BLM is whether to authorize the construction of the cross-fence and wildlife guzzler for the Apache Canyon Allotment No. 16023 on public lands or to reject the proposed action. For projects which occur on or cross state lands, the applicant would need to obtain authorization from the State Land Office. 1.3. Plan Conformance This allotment is currently listed in the improve (I) category and management is in conformance with the White Sands Resource Area/Resource Management Plan (BLM 1986) as follows: (p. 31) The extent, location and timing of rangeland improvements will be based on allotment specific objectives developed through the resource management process, interdisciplinary development and review of proposed actions, contributions from operators and others, and BLM funding capability. Apache Canyon Fence and Wildlife Guzzler Environmental Assessment 1 March 2017 (p. 31) When rangeland improvements are constructed on public land, the BLM will adhere to procedures and design specifications to protect all resources. (p. 32) Disturbance of soil and vegetation at all project sites will be held to a minimum (BLM Policy and BLM Manual 6300). (p. 33) All refuse will be removed from work areas on public land and be disposed of in approved sanitary landfills. (p. 33) Visual resource contrast ratings would be completed as part of site-specific EAs prior to construction of all proposed rangeland improvements and implementation of grazing
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Lower Permian Abo Formation in the Fra Cristobal and Caballo Mountains, Sierra County, New Mexico Spencer G
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/63 The Lower Permian Abo Formation in the Fra Cristobal and Caballo Mountains, Sierra County, New Mexico Spencer G. Lucas, Karl Krainer, Dan S. Chaney, William A. DiMichele, Sebastian Voigt, David S. Berman, and Amy C. Henrici, 2012, pp. 345-376 in: Geology of the Warm Springs Region, Lucas, Spencer G.; McLemore, Virginia T.; Lueth, Virgil W.; Spielmann, Justin A.; Krainer, Karl, New Mexico Geological Society 63rd Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 580 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 2012 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download.
    [Show full text]
  • Southwest NM Publication List
    Southwest New Mexico Publication Inventory Draft Source of Document/Search Purchase Topic Category Keywords County Title Author Date Publication/Journal/Publisher Type of Document Method Price Geology 1 Geology geology, seismic Southwestern NM Six regionally extensive upper-crustal Ackermann, H.D., L.W. 1994 U.S. Geological Survey, Open-File Report 94- Electronic file USGS publication search refraction profiles, seismic refraction profiles in Southwest New Pankratz, D.P. Klein 695 (DJVU) http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/usgspubs/ southwestern New Mexico ofr/ofr94695 Mexico, 2 Geology Geology, Southwestern NM Magmatism and metamorphism at 1.46 Ga in Amato, J.M., A.O. 2008 In New Mexico Geological Society Fall Field Paper in Book http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/g $45.00 magmatism, the Burro Mountains, southwestern New Boullion, and A.E. Conference Guidebook - 59, Geology of the Gila uidebooks/59/ metamorphism, Mexico Sanders Wilderness-Silver City area, 107-116. Burro Mountains, southwestern New Mexico 3 Geology Geology, mineral Catron County Geology and mineral resources of York Anderson, O.J. 1986 New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Electronic file (PDF) NMBGMR search $10.00 for resources, York Ranch SE quadrangle, Cibola and Catron Resources Open File Report 220A, 22 pages. <http://geoinfo.nmt.edu/publicatio CD Ranch, Fence Counties, New Mexico ns/openfile/details.cfml?Volume=2 Lake, Catron, 20A> Cibola 4 Geology Geology, Zuni Salt Catron County Geology of the Zuni Salt Lake 7 1/2 Minute Anderson, O.J. 1994 New Mexico Bureau of Mines and
    [Show full text]
  • Plan for the Recovery of Desert Bighorn Sheep in New Mexico 2003-2013
    PLAN FOR THE RECOVERY OF DESERT BIGHORN SHEEP IN NEW MEXICO 2003-2013 New Mexico Department of Game and Fish August 2003 Executive Summary Desert bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis mexicana) were once prolific in New Mexico, occupying most arid mountain ranges in the southern part of the state. Over-hunting, and disease transmission from livestock are 2 primary reasons for the dramatic decline in bighorn sheep numbers throughout the west during the early 1900s. In 1980, desert bighorn were placed on New Mexico’s endangered species list. From 1992-2003, approximately 25% of bighorn were radiocollared to learn causes of mortality driving this species towards extinction. Approximately 85% of all known-cause non-hunter killed radiocollared individuals have been killed by mountain lions. Despite the lack of a native ungulate prey base in desert bighorn range, mountain lion populations remain high, leading to the hypothesis that mountain lions are subsidized predators feeding on exotic ungulates, including cattle. Lack of fine fuels from cattle grazing have resulted in a lack of fire on the landscape. This has lead to increased woody vegetation which inhibits bighorn’s ability to detect and escape from predators. Bighorn numbers in spring 2003 in New Mexico totaled 213 in the wild, and 91 at the Red Rock captive breeding facility. This is in spite of releasing 266 bighorn from Red Rock and 30 bighorn from Arizona between 1979 and 2002. Several existing herds of desert bighorn likely need an augmentation to prevent them from going extinct. The presence of domestic sheep and Barbary sheep, which pose risks to bighorn from fatal disease transmission and aggression, respectively, preclude reintroduction onto many unoccupied mountain ranges.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Mineral Resources in the Zuni Mountains Mining District, Cibola County, New Mexico: Revisitied Virginia T
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/64 Geology and mineral resources in the Zuni Mountains mining district, Cibola County, New Mexico: Revisitied Virginia T. McLemore, 2013, pp. 131-142 in: Geology of Route 66 Region: Flagstaff to Grants, Zeigler, Kate; Timmons, J. Michael; Timmons, Stacy; Semken, Steve, New Mexico Geological Society 64th Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 237 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 2013 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks. Copyright Information Publications of the New Mexico Geological Society, printed and electronic, are protected by the copyright laws of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Watershed Assessment El Paso- Las Cruces Watershed
    El Paso-Las Cruces Watershed (HUC8 13030102) Rapid Watershed Assessment El Paso- Las Cruces Watershed 1 El Paso-Las Cruces Watershed (HUC8 13030102) The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. 2 El Paso-Las Cruces Watershed (HUC8 13030102) Table of Contents Overview ......................................................................................................................................... 5 Physical Setting ............................................................................................................................... 7 Precipitation .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • EPGS Guidebook
    THE EL PAS0 GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY GUIDEBOOK FOURTH ANNUAL FIELD TRIP CENOZOIC STRATIGRAPHY Of THE RIO GRANDE VALLEY AREA DORA ANA COUNTY NEW MEXICO MARCH 14, 1970 CENOZOIC STRATIGRAPHY OF THE RIO GRANDE VALLEY AREA DQk ANA COUNTY, NEW MEXICO John W. Hawley - Editor and Cmpi ler GUIDEBOOK FOURTH ANNUAL FIELD TRIP of the EL PAS0 GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY March 14, 1970 Compiled in Cooperati on with: Department of Geological Sciences, University of Texas at El Paso Earth Sciences and Astronomy Department, New Mexi co State University Soi 1 Survey Investigations, SCS, USDA, University Park, New Mexico New Mexico State Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources, Socorro, New Mexico EL PAS0 GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OFFICERS Charles J. Crowley Presi dent El Paso Natural Gas C. Tom Hollenshead Vice President El Paso Natural Gas Carl Cotton Secretary El Paso Indpt. School Dist. Thomas F. Cliett Treasurer El Paso Water Utilities Wi11 iam N. McAnul ty Counci lor Dept. Geol. Sci., UTEP Robert D. Habbit Councilor El Paso Natural Gas FIELD TRIP COMMITTEES Guidebook John W. Hawley Edi tor and compi 1er Soi 1 Survey Invest., SCS Jerry M. Hoffer Contributor and editing Dept. Geol. Sci., UTEP William R. Seager Contributor and editing Earth Sci. Dept. NMSU Frank E. Kottlowski Contributor and editing N. M. Bur. Mines & Min. Res. Earl M.P. Lovejoy Contributor and editing Dept. Geol. Sci., UTEP William S. Strain Contributor and editing Dept. Geol. Sci., UTEP Paul a Blackshear Typing Dept. Geol . Sci ., UTEP Robert Sepul veda Drafting Dept. Geol . Sci ., UTEP Caravan Earl M. P. Lovejoy Pub1 icity and Regi stration Charles J.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphy of the Big Hatchet Mountains-Florida Mountains Region Zeller, Robert A., Jr., 1970, Pp
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/21 Stratigraphy of the Big Hatchet Mountains-Florida Mountains region Zeller, Robert A., Jr., 1970, pp. 44-58 in: Tyrone, Big Hatchet Mountain, Florida Mountains Region, Woodward, L. A.; [ed.], New Mexico Geological Society 21st Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 176 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 1970 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks. Copyright Information Publications of the New Mexico Geological Society, printed and electronic, are protected by the copyright laws of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphy of the San Andres Mountains in South-Central New Mexico Frank E
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/26 Stratigraphy of the San Andres Mountains in south-central New Mexico Frank E. Kottlowski, 1975, pp. 95-104 in: Las Cruces Country, Seager, W. R.; Clemons, R. E.; Callender, J. F.; [eds.], New Mexico Geological Society 26th Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 376 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 1975 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks. Copyright Information Publications of the New Mexico Geological Society, printed and electronic, are protected by the copyright laws of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Mesozoic–Paleogene Structural Evolution of the Southern U.S. Cordillera As Revealed in the Little and Big Hatchet Mountains, GEOSPHERE; V
    Research Paper GEOSPHERE Mesozoic–Paleogene structural evolution of the southern U.S. Cordillera as revealed in the Little and Big Hatchet Mountains, GEOSPHERE; v. 14, no. 1 southwest New Mexico, USA doi:10.1130/GES01539.1 Christopher A. Clinkscales1 and Timothy F. Lawton2 1 12 figures; 1 table; 1 supplemental file Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, 1040 4th Street, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA 2Centro de Geociencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Boulevard Juriquilla 3001, Campus Juriquilla, Juriquilla, QRO 76230, México CORRESPONDENCE: clinkscales@ email .arizona .edu ABSTRACT Upper Eocene–Oligocene ignimbrites and volcaniclastic rocks of the Boot Heel volcanic field of southwestern New Mexico unconformably overlie Lara- CITATION: Clinkscales, C.A., and Lawton, T.F., 2018, Mesozoic–Paleogene structural evolution A Mesozoic to Paleogene polyphase tectonic model presented here for mide syntectonic strata and bury eroded Laramide structures. The distribution of the southern U.S. Cordillera as revealed in the the southern United States (U.S.) Cordillera provides new insight into style of the Paleogene volcanic rocks in the Little Hatchet and Big Hatchet Moun- Little and Big Hatchet Mountains, southwest New and timing of Mesozoic–Paleogene deformation and basin formation in the tains is in part controlled by synmagmatic east-west and northwest-south- Mexico, USA: Geosphere, v. 14, no. 1, p. 162–186, doi:10.1130/GES01539.1. region south of the Colorado Plateau and Mogollon-Datil volcanic field. The east normal faults active from ca. 34 to 27 Ma, the age range of rhyolite dikes model proposes reverse reactivation of Jurassic normal faults during Late intruded along the faults.
    [Show full text]
  • New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources Rockhound Guide
    New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources Socorro, New Mexico Information: 505-835-5420 Publications: 505-83-5490 FAX: 505-835-6333 A Division of New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology Dear “Rockhound” Thank you for your interest in mineral collecting in New Mexico. The New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources has put together this packet of material (we call it our “Rockhound Guide”) that we hope will be useful to you. This information is designed to direct people to localities where they may collect specimens and also to give them some brief information about the area. These sites have been chosen because they may be reached by passenger car. We hope the information included here will lead to many enjoyable hours of collecting minerals in the “Land of Enchantment.” Enjoy your excursion, but please follow these basic rules: Take only what you need for your own collection, leave what you can’t use. Keep New Mexico beautiful. If you pack it in, pack it out. Respect the rights of landowners and lessees. Make sure you have permission to collect on private land, including mines. Be extremely careful around old mines, especially mine shafts. Respect the desert climate. Carry plenty of water for yourself and your vehicle. Be aware of flash-flooding hazards. The New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources has a whole series of publications to assist in the exploration for mineral resources in New Mexico. These publications are reasonably priced at about the cost of printing. New Mexico State Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources Bulletin 87, “Mineral and Water Resources of New Mexico,” describes the important mineral deposits of all types, as presently known in the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter 2019 (PDF)
    New Mexico State University Department of Geological Sciences Newsletter 2019 Editor: Jeff Amato INSIDE THIS ISSUE We now have a depart- Phone: 575-646-3017 | [email protected] Inside this issue 1 mental Twitter account. Department Phone: 575-646-2708 Message from the Dept Head 2-3 Become a follower to keep Hall of Fame Celebration 4-5 track of our activities: Front cover: View of a 7.6 Ma basalt Southern Rift Institute 6-7 dike cutting Permian limestone in Field Trips & Conferences 8-11 @NMSUGeology the Prehistoric Trackways National Faculty Profiles 12-18 Monument. Graduate student Nick Field Camp 19-21 Richard was working on this project for Photos and Degrees 22 his MS degree which he finished in 2018. Giving Tuesday 23 Doña Ana Mountains and Rio Grande in the background. Photo by Jeff Amato. Back cover: Emily Johnson at the 2019 “Space Festival”. This event was designed to educate the public about science and space-related activities. The Starry Night event is sponsored by the College of Arts and Sciences. This year we honored Lee Hubbard, our Departmental Administrative Assitant. Lee Hubbard is, we all agree, the STAR of the Department of Geological Sciences. There is a reason that all of the graduate students thank her in the acknowledgements of their colloquia. There is a reason that every Homecoming event happens flawlessly. There is a reason that faculty and students feel welcome in the geology office. There is a reason that the administrative functions of the department run smoothly. Lee! She is the reason! Lee started at NMSU in 1990 and joined the Department of Geological Sciences in 1996.
    [Show full text]
  • Cooling Histories of Mountain Ranges in the Southern Rio Grande Rift Based on Apatite Fission-Track Analysis—A Reconnaissance Survey
    Cooling histories of mountain ranges in the southern Rio Grande rift based on apatite fission-track analysis—a reconnaissance survey by Shari A. Kelley, Dept. of Earth and Environmental Sciences, New Mexico Institute of Mining & Technology, Socorro, NM 87801-4796; and Charles E. Chapin, New Mexico Bureau of Mines & Mineral Resources, Socorro, NM 87801-4796 Abstract Fifty-two apatite fission-track (AFT) and two zircon fission-track ages were deter- mined during a reconnaissance study of the cooling and tectonic history of uplifts asso- dated with the southern Rio Grande rift in south-central New Mexico. Mack et al. (1994a, b) proposed that the southern rift has been affected by four episodes of extension beginning at about 35 Ma. The main phases of faulting started in the late Eocene, the late Oligocene, the middle Miocene, and the latest Miocene to early Pliocene, with each phase disrupting earlier rift basins and in some cases reversing the dip of the early rift half-grabens found in the vicinity of the southern Caballo Mountains. The timing of denudation derived from AFT data in the Caballo, Mud Springs, San Diego, and Dona Ana mountains are consistent with the episodes of uplift and erosion preserved in the Oligocene to Miocene Hayner Ranch and Rincon Valley Formations in the southern Caballo Mountains. Each mountain block studied in the southern rift has a unique history. AFT ages in the Proterozoic rocks on the east side of the San Andres Mountains record cooling of this mountain block at 21 to 22 Ma in re- sponse to the phase of extension that began in the late Oligocene.
    [Show full text]