DOCSLIB.ORG

Retail Performance Florida

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Retail Performance Florida RETAIL PERFORMANCE FLORIDA Retailer Performance Overview Burger Grill (35.0%), Zoe’s Kitchen (33.3%), Del Frisco’s Grille (31.9%), and Diversified Restaurant Holdings (30.2%) In terms of overall revenue growth by segment, restaurants whose brands include Buffalo Wild Wings. were dominant with four of the top five performers coming from this industry. Entertainment and Dining Restaurants According to a forecast by the National Restaurant saw the largest uptick in growth, experiencing a 12.2% Association, Florida is projected to experience the largest increase over the past twelve months. Furniture and Home increase in sales growth in 2016 (7.4%), outpacing Nevada Furnishing Stores (12.1%), Quick Service Restaurants (7.3%), Washington (7.0%), and California (6.6%). The NRA (12.0%), Fast Casual Restaurants (11.8%), and Fine Dining anticipates that growth amongst the Quick Service segment Restaurants (10.0%) rounded out the top five. should continue to outpace table service sales. On the opposite end of the spectrum, Convenience, Over the past several years there has been a push to Electronic, and Department Stores were the only segments downsize across retail segments and experimentation with to experience a contraction over the last year. smaller format stores is underway. Retailers from Target, to Dollar General, Best Buy, and the like have embraced this In terms of specific retailers experiencing the largest gains push and many locations have sprouted up in more densely in revenue, restaurants unsurprisingly made up a majority populated urban areas. Notwithstanding the move by big of the top 10. Establishments in the top 10 with a Florida box retailers to smaller footprints, the usual suspects top presence include Shake Shack (63.3%), The Habit the list of most efficient retailers in terms of sales per sq. ft. Figure 1: Avg. Revenue Growth by Segment Entertainment & Dining Restaurants 12.2% Furniture & Home Furnishing Stores 12.1% Quick Service Restaurants 12.0% Fast Casual Restaurants 11.8% Fine Dining Restaurants 10.0% Shoe Stores 8.5% Off-Price Stores 6.3% Family Dining Restaurants 6.0% Luxury, Jewelry & Accessories Stores 6.0% Grocery Stores For 5.9% Sporting Goods Stores details 5.8% Casual Dining Restaurants click 5.7% Discount & Variety Stores segment 5.7% Auto & Marine Parts Stores on left 5.5% Leisure & Entertainment Venues 5.2% Home Improvement Stores 4.7% Beverage & Snack Shops 4.0% Brand Manufacturers 3.1% Drug, Health & Beauty Stores 2.7% Miscellaneous Stores 1.5% Apparel Stores 0.6% Department Stores -0.1% Electronic Stores -1.9% Convenience Stores -12.7% (13.0)% (8.0)% (3.0)% 2.0% 7.0% 12.0% Source: eMarketer & CBRE Research, Q1 2016. Q1 2016 CBRE Research ©2016 CBRE, Inc. | 1 RETAIL PERFORMANCE FLORIDA Luxury, Jewelry, and Accessories retailers accounted for 20% Figure 2: Revenue Growth (Year-over-Year) , Top 10 National Companies of the 50 most efficient firms. The high price of jewelry coupled with the smaller footprints (2,540 sq. ft. average) TOTAL contributed to the strong ranking. REVENUE COMPANY SEGMENT GROWTH Good Times Restaurants Quick Service Restaurants 68.2% Following the Luxury, Jewelry, and Accessories segment, Mattress Firm Home Furnishing Stores 65.7% Brand Manufacturers (10%) and Casual Dining Restaurants Shake Shack Quick Service Restaurants 63.3% (10%) rounded out the top three in terms of space Walgreens Drug, Health & Beauty Stores 45.5% efficiency. The Habit Burger Grill Fast Casual Restaurants 35.0% Boot Barn Shoe Stores 34.8% Drilling down to the specific companies, a leading Zoes Kitchen Fast Casual Restaurants 33.3% electronics company recorded the highest sales per sq. ft. Skechers Brand Manufacturers 32.6% figure over the last twelve months , averaging over $5,800. Del Frisco's Grille Fine Dining Restaurants 31.9% Convenience Store operator, Murphy USA, also had a strong Diversified Restaurant Holdings Casual Dining Restaurants 30.2% efficiency showing, coming in at over $3,700 in sales per sq. ft. With an average store size of 500 sq. ft., Murphy USA has Source: eMarketer & CBRE Research, Q1 2016. the smallest footprint of all the eMarketer tracked retailers. Figure 3: Retailer Segment as % of Top 50 National Firms by Sales per Sq. Ft. Also faring well with regard to sales per sq. ft., Tiffany & Co. Luxury, Jewelry & Accessories Stores 2%2% registered at over $2,900. The Luxury, Jewelry and Accessory 4% Brand Manufacturers 4% 20% Casual Dining Restaurants retailer, which averages a 4,100 sq. ft. footprint, has made a 6% Apparel Stores recent push to better cater to its more affluent customers by Fast Casual Restaurants 6% Quick Service Restaurants introducing additional “ultra-high-end” pieces. Drug, Health & Beauty Stores 10% 6% Electronic Stores Fine Dining Restaurants Those stores experiencing the lowest sales per sq. ft. over 6% Grocery Stores 10% the last year predominantly fell within the Leisure and Discount & Variety Stores 8% Furniture & Home Furnishing Stores Entertainment segment. Carmike Cinemas was at the 8% Beverage & Snack Shops 8% Convenience Stores bottom of the list, bringing in an average of $68 per sq. ft. This figure is nearly 35% below sales per sq. ft. by AMC, Source: eMarketer & CBRE Research, Q1 2016. which recently acquired the company creating the largest movie theater chain in the United States. Figure 4: Sales per Sq. Ft., Top 10 National Companies $7,000 Hancock Fabrics, who filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection this year, was also on the low end of the $6,000 spectrum coming in at $77 in sales per sq. ft. Hancock $5,000 Fabrics is expected to close 70 stores as part of its $4,000 restructuring plan. $3,000 $2,000 Moving forward, the National Retail Federation is predicting $1,000 2016 growth in retail sales to surpass the 10-year average of $0 2.7%. Current estimates forecast growth of 3.1% which will be aided by continued job creation, rising wages, and an associated increase in discretionary income. Source: eMarketer & CBRE Research, Q1 2016. Q1 2016 CBRE Research ©2016 CBRE, Inc. | 2 RETAIL PERFORMANCE FLORIDA Addendum: Retailer Performance Data* HOME Apparel Stores TOTAL REVENUES TOTAL REVENUE AVG. STORE AVG. SALES AVG. SALES COMPANY (MM) GROWTH STORES SQ FT PER STORE (M) PER SQ FT Abercrombie & Fitch (Abercrombie & Fitch Co.) $1,449.9 -6.3% 279 9,600 $3,888 $401 Abercrombie & Fitch Co. $3,525.2 -10.2% 965 7,700 $2,798 $361 abercrombie kids (Abercrombie & Fitch Co.) $321.4 -7.3% 122 5,500 $1,793 $339 Aeropostale $1,602.6 -16.3% 824 3,900 $1,601 $418 American Apparel $538.2 0.0% 227 3,100 $1,285 $418 American Eagle Outfitters $3,487.9 7.2% 1068 6,300 $2,658 $424 Ann Inc. $2,540.6 1.2% 1034 5,700 $2,049 $361 Ann Taylor (Ann Inc.) $944.2 -1.7% 360 5,400 $1,999 $369 Anthropologie (Urban Outfitters, Inc.) $1,441.3 5.1% 214 9,000 $4,764 $527 Ascena Retail Group $5,280.7 10.3% 4818 5,500 $1,117 $204 Banana Republic (Gap Inc.) $2,768.0 -4.7% 679 8,100 $3,483 $431 bebe stores $415.7 -1.9% 203 3,900 $1,508 $383 Ben Sherman (Oxford Industries) $77.5 15.3% 21 2,200 $1,815 $795 Body Central $225.8 -24.3% 272 4,300 $733 $172 Cache $203.4 -8.2% 236 2,000 $753 $372 Carter's (Carter's, Inc.) $2,266.4 8.2% 577 4,400 $1,665 $378 Catherines (Ascena Retail Group) $345.1 2.9% 377 4,000 $763 $187 Chico’s FAS, Inc. $2,671.8 1.6% 1546 2,900 $1,523 $530 Chico's/Soma Intimates (Chico’s FAS, Inc.) $1,693.3 1.7% 1018 3,000 $1,516 $512 Christopher & Banks $387.2 -9.0% 538 3,900 $632 $167 Citi Trends $688.9 6.5% 520 13,400 $1,338 $100 Claire’s Stores $1,412.7 -6.9% 2926 1,000 $463 $454 Danier Leather $115.3 -12.6% 87 3,200 $1,281 $407 dELiA's $120.0 -28.8% 95 3,800 $848 $220 Destination Maternity $548.9 -4.8% 554 2,200 $584 $270 Destination XL Group $437.7 8.7% 354 5,800 $1,028 $181 dressbarn (Ascena Retail Group) $1,011.4 -1.3% 828 8,000 $1,167 $147 Express $2,310.4 7.2% 654 8,700 $2,950 $337 francesca's $412.4 13.9% 619 1,400 $686 $506 Frederick's of Hollywood $83.0 -14.6% 105 2,000 $473 $242 Free People (Urban Outfitters, Inc.) $583.7 16.5% 112 2,200 $1,452 $705 Gap (Gap Inc.) $5,824.0 -7.2% 1422 10,100 $3,379 $335 Gap Inc. $16,120.0 -1.1% 3346 11,500 $3,998 $345 Hollister (Abercrombie & Fitch Co.) $1,867.7 -8.4% 570 7,300 $2,637 $361 J.Crew $2,500.2 -2.4% 536 5,600 $3,173 $565 Jos. A. Bank $1,053.5 0.9% 578 4,600 $1,535 $332 Justice (Ascena Retail Group) $1,225.2 -10.5% 828 4,000 $978 $233 L Brands $11,827.4 5.6% 3003 4,900 $3,259 $672 Lands' End $1,489.4 -6.4% 243 7,900 $870 $111 Lane Bryant (Ascena Retail Group) $1,106.4 2.6% 772 5,600 $1,161 $209 Lids (Genesco) $969.8 12.8% 1347 1,200 $542 $461 Lilly Pulitzer (Oxford Industries) $202.5 24.2% 34 2,800 $2,431 $869 Loft (Ann Inc.) $1,596.4 3.1% 674 5,800 $2,077 $356 lululemon athletica $1,958.7 14.2% 354 2,900 $4,589 $1,560 maurices (Ascena Retail Group) $1,091.4 11.2% 964 5,200 $1,046 $204 Q1 2016 CBRE Research ©2016 CBRE, Inc.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fuel Forecourt Retail Market
    Fuel Forecourt Retail Market Grow non-fuel Are you set to be the mobility offerings — both products and Capitalise on the value-added mobility mega services trends (EVs, AVs and MaaS)1 retailer of tomorrow? Continue to focus on fossil Innovative Our report on Fuel Forecourt Retail Market focusses In light of this, w e have imagined how forecourts w ill fuel in short run, concepts and on the future of forecourt retailing. In the follow ing look like in the future. We believe that the in-city but start to pivot strategic Continuously pages w e delve into how the trends today are petrol stations w hich have a location advantage, w ill tow ards partnerships contemporary evolve shaping forecourt retailing now and tomorrow . We become suited for convenience retailing; urban fuel business start by looking at the current state of the Global forecourts w ould become prominent transport Relentless focus on models Forecourt Retail Market, both in terms of geographic exchanges; and highw ay sites w ill cater to long customer size and the top players dominating this space. distance travellers. How ever the level and speed of Explore Enhance experience Innovation new such transformation w ill vary by economy, as operational Next, w e explore the trends that are re-shaping the for income evolutionary trends in fuel retailing observed in industry; these are centred around the increase in efficiency tomorrow streams developed markets are yet to fully shape-up in importance of the Retail proposition, Adjacent developing ones. Services and Mobility. As you go along, you w ill find examples of how leading organisations are investing Further, as the pace of disruption accelerates, fuel their time and resources, in technology and and forecourt retailers need to reimagine innovative concepts to become more future-ready.
    [Show full text]
  • National Retailer & Restaurant Expansion Guide Spring 2016
    National Retailer & Restaurant Expansion Guide Spring 2016 Retailer Expansion Guide Spring 2016 National Retailer & Restaurant Expansion Guide Spring 2016 >> CLICK BELOW TO JUMP TO SECTION DISCOUNTER/ APPAREL BEAUTY SUPPLIES DOLLAR STORE OFFICE SUPPLIES SPORTING GOODS SUPERMARKET/ ACTIVE BEVERAGES DRUGSTORE PET/FARM GROCERY/ SPORTSWEAR HYPERMARKET CHILDREN’S BOOKS ENTERTAINMENT RESTAURANT BAKERY/BAGELS/ FINANCIAL FAMILY CARDS/GIFTS BREAKFAST/CAFE/ SERVICES DONUTS MEN’S CELLULAR HEALTH/ COFFEE/TEA FITNESS/NUTRITION SHOES CONSIGNMENT/ HOME RELATED FAST FOOD PAWN/THRIFT SPECIALTY CONSUMER FURNITURE/ FOOD/BEVERAGE ELECTRONICS FURNISHINGS SPECIALTY CONVENIENCE STORE/ FAMILY WOMEN’S GAS STATIONS HARDWARE CRAFTS/HOBBIES/ AUTOMOTIVE JEWELRY WITH LIQUOR TOYS BEAUTY SALONS/ DEPARTMENT MISCELLANEOUS SPAS STORE RETAIL 2 Retailer Expansion Guide Spring 2016 APPAREL: ACTIVE SPORTSWEAR 2016 2017 CURRENT PROJECTED PROJECTED MINMUM MAXIMUM RETAILER STORES STORES IN STORES IN SQUARE SQUARE SUMMARY OF EXPANSION 12 MONTHS 12 MONTHS FEET FEET Athleta 46 23 46 4,000 5,000 Nationally Bikini Village 51 2 4 1,400 1,600 Nationally Billabong 29 5 10 2,500 3,500 West Body & beach 10 1 2 1,300 1,800 Nationally Champs Sports 536 1 2 2,500 5,400 Nationally Change of Scandinavia 15 1 2 1,200 1,800 Nationally City Gear 130 15 15 4,000 5,000 Midwest, South D-TOX.com 7 2 4 1,200 1,700 Nationally Empire 8 2 4 8,000 10,000 Nationally Everything But Water 72 2 4 1,000 5,000 Nationally Free People 86 1 2 2,500 3,000 Nationally Fresh Produce Sportswear 37 5 10 2,000 3,000 CA
    [Show full text]
  • For the Fuel & Convenience Store Industry
    FOOT TRAFFIC REPORT FOR THE FUEL & CONVENIENCE STORE INDUSTRY Q1 2017 A NEW ERA FOR THE CONVENIENCE STORE As the convenience store industry adapts to meet customer needs and grow market share, location intelligence is becoming increasingly critical to understanding consumer habits and behaviors. GasBuddy and Cuebiq teamed up in the first quarter of 2017 to issue the first foot traffic report for the fuel and convenience store industry. Highlights: GasBuddy and Cuebiq examined 23.5 million consumer trips to the pumps and convenience stores between January 1 and March 31. In Q1, more than half of GasBuddies visited locations within six miles of their homes or places of employment, giving retailers the opportunity to leverage their greatest resource—knowing their customer base—to localize and personalize their product selection. Weekdays between 11:00 a.m. and 1:00 p.m. were highly-trafficked hours in Q1. Convenience stores are poised to lure business away from QSRs and grocery stores now that customers can eat quality meals at the same place and time they choose to fill up their tanks. With filling a gas tank clocking in at an efficient 2-3 minutes, the 73% of GasBuddies who spent more than five minutes at locations in Q1 demonstrated that consumers are likely willing to spend some time in store before or after visiting the pumps. QUARTERLY FOOT TRAFFIC REPORT 1 GasBuddy examined nearly 23.5 million consumer trips to gas Indiana-based gas station and stations and c-stores in Q1 2017 convenience store chain Ricker’s enjoys a loyal GasBuddy customer Which fuel brands captured the base—the nearly 50-station brand highest ratio of footfall per station? captured more than 4x the industry average footfall per location in Q1.
    [Show full text]
  • Market Cap Close ADV 1598 67Th Pctl 745,214,477.91 $ 23.96
    Market Cap Close ADV 1598 67th Pctl $ 745,214,477.91 $ 23.96 225,966.94 801 33rd Pctl $ 199,581,478.89 $ 10.09 53,054.83 2399 Ticker_ Listing_ Effective_ Revised Symbol Security_Name Exchange Date Mkt Cap Close ADV Stratum Stratum AAC AAC Holdings, Inc. N 20160906 M M M M-M-M M-M-M AAMC Altisource Asset Management Corp A 20160906 L M L L-M-L L-M-L AAN Aarons Inc N 20160906 H H H H-H-H H-H-H AAV Advantage Oil & Gas Ltd N 20160906 H L M H-L-M H-M-M AB Alliance Bernstein Holding L P N 20160906 H M M H-M-M H-M-M ABG Asbury Automotive Group Inc N 20160906 H H H H-H-H H-H-H ABM ABM Industries Inc. N 20160906 H H H H-H-H H-H-H AC Associated Capital Group, Inc. N 20160906 H H L H-H-L H-H-L ACCO ACCO Brand Corp. N 20160906 H L H H-L-H H-L-H ACU Acme United A 20160906 L M L L-M-L L-M-L ACY AeroCentury Corp A 20160906 L L L L-L-L L-L-L ADK Adcare Health System A 20160906 L L L L-L-L L-L-L ADPT Adeptus Health Inc. N 20160906 M H H M-H-H M-H-H AE Adams Res Energy Inc A 20160906 L H L L-H-L L-H-L AEL American Equity Inv Life Hldg Co N 20160906 H M H H-M-H H-M-H AF Astoria Financial Corporation N 20160906 H M H H-M-H H-M-H AGM Fed Agricul Mtg Clc Non Voting N 20160906 M H M M-H-M M-H-M AGM A Fed Agricultural Mtg Cla Voting N 20160906 L H L L-H-L L-H-L AGRO Adecoagro S A N 20160906 H L H H-L-H H-L-H AGX Argan Inc N 20160906 M H M M-H-M M-H-M AHC A H Belo Corp N 20160906 L L L L-L-L L-L-L AHL ASPEN Insurance Holding Limited N 20160906 H H H H-H-H H-H-H AHS AMN Healthcare Services Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • FIC-Prop-65-Notice-Reporter.Pdf
    FIC Proposition 65 Food Notice Reporter (Current as of 9/25/2021) A B C D E F G H Date Attorney Alleged Notice General Manufacturer Product of Amended/ Additional Chemical(s) 60 day Notice Link was Case /Company Concern Withdrawn Notice Detected 1 Filed Number Sprouts VeggIe RotInI; Sprouts FruIt & GraIn https://oag.ca.gov/system/fIl Sprouts Farmers Cereal Bars; Sprouts 9/24/21 2021-02369 Lead es/prop65/notIces/2021- Market, Inc. SpInach FettucIne; 02369.pdf Sprouts StraIght Cut 2 Sweet Potato FrIes Sprouts Pasta & VeggIe https://oag.ca.gov/system/fIl Sprouts Farmers 9/24/21 2021-02370 Sauce; Sprouts VeggIe Lead es/prop65/notIces/2021- Market, Inc. 3 Power Bowl 02370.pdf Dawn Anderson, LLC; https://oag.ca.gov/system/fIl 9/24/21 2021-02371 Sprouts Farmers OhI Wholesome Bars Lead es/prop65/notIces/2021- 4 Market, Inc. 02371.pdf Brad's Raw ChIps, LLC; https://oag.ca.gov/system/fIl 9/24/21 2021-02372 Sprouts Farmers Brad's Raw ChIps Lead es/prop65/notIces/2021- 5 Market, Inc. 02372.pdf Plant Snacks, LLC; Plant Snacks Vegan https://oag.ca.gov/system/fIl 9/24/21 2021-02373 Sprouts Farmers Cheddar Cassava Root Lead es/prop65/notIces/2021- 6 Market, Inc. ChIps 02373.pdf Nature's Earthly https://oag.ca.gov/system/fIl ChoIce; Global JuIces Nature's Earthly ChoIce 9/24/21 2021-02374 Lead es/prop65/notIces/2021- and FruIts, LLC; Great Day Beet Powder 02374.pdf 7 Walmart, Inc. Freeland Foods, LLC; Go Raw OrganIc https://oag.ca.gov/system/fIl 9/24/21 2021-02375 Ralphs Grocery Sprouted Sea Salt Lead es/prop65/notIces/2021- 8 Company Sunflower Seeds 02375.pdf The CarrIngton Tea https://oag.ca.gov/system/fIl CarrIngton Farms Beet 9/24/21 2021-02376 Company, LLC; Lead es/prop65/notIces/2021- Root Powder 9 Walmart, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • March 31, 2021
    Units Cost Market Value US Equity Index Fund US Equities 95.82% Domestic Common Stocks 10X GENOMICS INC 126 10,868 24,673 1LIFE HEALTHCARE INC 145 6,151 4,794 2U INC 101 5,298 4,209 3D SYSTEMS CORP 230 5,461 9,193 3M CO 1,076 182,991 213,726 8X8 INC 156 2,204 4,331 A O SMITH CORP 401 17,703 28,896 A10 NETWORKS INC 58 350 653 AAON INC 82 3,107 5,132 AARON'S CO INC/THE 43 636 1,376 ABBOTT LABORATORIES 3,285 156,764 380,830 ABBVIE INC 3,463 250,453 390,072 ABERCROMBIE & FITCH CO 88 2,520 4,086 ABIOMED INC 81 6,829 25,281 ABM INDUSTRIES INC 90 2,579 3,992 ACACIA RESEARCH CORP 105 1,779 710 ACADIA HEALTHCARE CO INC 158 8,583 9,915 ACADIA PHARMACEUTICALS INC 194 6,132 4,732 ACADIA REALTY TRUST 47 1,418 1,032 ACCELERATE DIAGNOSTICS INC 80 1,788 645 ACCELERON PHARMA INC 70 2,571 8,784 ACCO BRANDS CORP 187 1,685 1,614 ACCURAY INC 64 483 289 ACI WORLDWIDE INC 166 3,338 6,165 ACTIVISION BLIZZARD INC 1,394 52,457 133,043 ACUITY BRANDS INC 77 13,124 14,401 ACUSHNET HOLDINGS CORP 130 2,487 6,422 ADAPTHEALTH CORP 394 14,628 10,800 ADAPTIVE BIOTECHNOLOGIES CORP 245 11,342 10,011 ADOBE INC 891 82,407 521,805 ADT INC 117 716 1,262 ADTALEM GLOBAL EDUCATION INC 99 4,475 3,528 ADTRAN INC 102 2,202 2,106 ADVANCE AUTO PARTS INC 36 6,442 7,385 ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS INC 116 3,153 13,522 ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES INC 64 1,704 7,213 ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 2,228 43,435 209,276 ADVERUM BIOTECHNOLOGIES INC 439 8,321 1,537 AECOM 283 12,113 17,920 AERIE PHARMACEUTICALS INC 78 2,709 1,249 AERSALE CORP 2,551 30,599 31,785 AES CORP/THE 1,294 17,534 33,735 AFFILIATED
    [Show full text]
  • Dollar Tree, Inc
    Feltl and Company Research Department 225 South Sixth Street, Suite 4200 Minneapolis, MN 55402 1.866.655.3431 Brent R. Rystrom [email protected] | 612.492.8810 Dollar Tree, Inc. Consumer- Retail Au gust 12, 2009 Company Description: Dollar Tree is the leading participant in the Extreme Value Retailing sector, one of the strongest sectors in the US retailing. DLTR operates over 3700 stores in 48 states, and is growing its units by 6% annually while delivering double-digit earnings growth. DLTR is based in Chesapeake, Virginia. Initiating Coverage (DLTR - $46.03) Strong Buy Key Points Financial Summary We are initiating research coverage of Dollar Tree with a Strong Buy rating and a $62 price target. Dollar Tree (DLTR) is the leading participant in the Extreme Value Retailing category. DLTR delivers strong unit growth, generally healthy same-store sales Rev(mil) 2008A 2009E 2010E results, compelling margins, and exceptional EPS growth and return on investment. Apr $1,051 $1,201A $1,281E In almost every one of these metrics, it outperforms almost all peers, both direct in Jul $1,093 $1,220A $1,320E the EVR category and in other major retailing sectors. Oct $1,114 $1,206E $1,311E Jan $1,387 $1,522E $1,662E DLTR operates one of the most profitable store concepts in retail. Its Dollar FY $4,645 $5,140E $5,573E Tree stores generate sales in excess of $1.3 million, contribution margins near P/Sales 0.90x 0.81x .83x $140,000, and earn about 100% annually on store-level investment. This generates substantial cash flows that easily fund operations while providing excess cash flows for other purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Family Presentation
    Investor Presentation May 2019 Murphy USA Inc. 1 Cautionary Statement This presentation contains forward-looking statements. These statements, which express management’s current views concerning future events or results, are subject to inherent risks and uncertainties. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in our forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the volatility and level of crude oil and gasoline prices, the pace and success of our expansion plan, our relationship with Walmart, political and regulatory uncertainty, uncontrollable natural hazards, and adverse market conditions or tax consequences, among other things. For further discussion of risk factors, see “Risk Factors” in the Murphy USA registration statement on our latest form 10-K. Murphy USA undertakes no duty to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements. The Murphy USA financial information in this presentation is derived from the audited and unaudited consolidated financial statements of Murphy USA, Inc. for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015, and 2014. Please reference our most recent 10-K, 10-Q, and 8-K filings for the latest information. If this presentation contains non-GAAP financial measures, we have provided a reconciliation of such non- GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable measures prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP in the Appendix to this presentation. Christian Pikul, CFA Senior Director of Investor Relations and FP&A Office: 870-875-7683
    [Show full text]
  • Jan Bormeth Vilhelmsen Og Ma
    0 ucvbnmqwertyuiopåasdfghjklæøzxcv Executive Summary The master thesis at hand is a study of the Danish retail store chain Tiger and EQT’s decision to acquire a 70% stake in the company. The aim in this thesis is twofold. Firstly, a valuation of Zebra per June 30, 2015, will be conducted. Secondly, an analysis of the value creation during EQT’s ownership period is performed. The main objective in this thesis is to estimate the fair Enterprise Value per June 30, 2015, through a DCF-analysis. Based on Zebra’s strategic position and its historical financial performance, the expected future earnings and cash flow generations were forecasted and resulted in an Enterprise Value of DKK 8,864 million from which the Group accounted for DKK 8,350 million and the Japanese Joint Venture for DKK 515 million. Based on these figures, Zebra’s fair value of equity comprises DKK 7,789 million. Of this figure, EQT’s share of the equity amounts to DKK 5,219 million and DKK 2,874 million when correcting for the 50/50 owned subsidiaries. At EQT’s entry in the beginning of 2013, the purchase price for its stake was DKK 1,600 million, according to different sources, resulting in an IRR for EQT on 26.48% per year. This IRR is satisfying since it is above the expected return for Private Equity investments which historically has a threshold for an IRR on over 20% per year, and in more recent time a threshold between 12-17% per year. The objective in the second part of this thesis is to analyze how EQT has created or destroyed value during its ownership period based on an IRR for Zebra, excluding the Japanese Joint Venture.
    [Show full text]
  • Fidelity® Total Market Index Fund
    Quarterly Holdings Report for Fidelity® Total Market Index Fund May 31, 2021 STI-QTLY-0721 1.816022.116 Schedule of Investments May 31, 2021 (Unaudited) Showing Percentage of Net Assets Common Stocks – 99.3% Shares Value Shares Value COMMUNICATION SERVICES – 10.1% World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc. Class A (b) 76,178 $ 4,253,780 Diversified Telecommunication Services – 1.1% Zynga, Inc. (a) 1,573,367 17,055,298 Alaska Communication Systems Group, Inc. 95,774 $ 317,970 1,211,987,366 Anterix, Inc. (a) (b) 16,962 838,941 Interactive Media & Services – 5.6% AT&T, Inc. 11,060,871 325,521,434 Alphabet, Inc.: ATN International, Inc. 17,036 805,292 Class A (a) 466,301 1,099,001,512 Bandwidth, Inc. (a) (b) 34,033 4,025,764 Class C (a) 446,972 1,077,899,796 Cincinnati Bell, Inc. (a) 84,225 1,297,065 ANGI Homeservices, Inc. Class A (a) 120,975 1,715,426 Cogent Communications Group, Inc. (b) 66,520 5,028,912 Autoweb, Inc. (a) (b) 6,653 19,028 Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc. (a) 110,609 1,035,300 Bumble, Inc. 77,109 3,679,641 Globalstar, Inc. (a) (b) 1,067,098 1,707,357 CarGurus, Inc. Class A (a) 136,717 3,858,154 IDT Corp. Class B (a) (b) 31,682 914,343 Cars.com, Inc. (a) 110,752 1,618,087 Iridium Communications, Inc. (a) 186,035 7,108,397 DHI Group, Inc. (a) (b) 99,689 319,005 Liberty Global PLC: Eventbrite, Inc. (a) 114,588 2,326,136 Class A (a) 196,087 5,355,136 EverQuote, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Dollar General: Heavy on Organization, Light on Systems
    Dollar General: Heavy on Organization, Light on Systems Dollar General Corporation, headquartered in Goodlettsville, Tennessee, is an aggressive competitor in the deep discount retail industry, fighting for position with other stores such as Family Dollar, Fred's, 99 Cents Only Stores, and Dollar Tree, as well as with retailers such as Wal-Mart, Kmart, CVS, and Rite Aid. Dollar General stores offer a product line of general merchandise that includes housewares and cleaning supplies, health and beauty aids, clothing, packaged food, stationery, seasonal offerings, and other household consumables. The company has been operating since 1939. Dollar General's most recent annual sales figures total $8.6 billion, placing the chain at the top of the dollar store category of discount retailers. Somewhat surprisingly, the chain is not achieving its success by following the example set by other successful discount retailers. Whereas competitors such as 99 Cents Only Stores consider middle- and high-income customers to be key contributors to their profits, Dollar General caters specifically to customers with low, middle, and fixed incomes. According to data from AC Nielsen, in 2005 48% of Dollar General's customers earned less than $30,000 per year, and 26% earned less than $20,000. Dollar General has kept away from the big box supercenter store model used by Wal-Mart and Kmart. This type of store is often located on the outskirts of cities or outside of particular towns to draw customers from a broad area. When placing new stores, Dollar General prefers to locate them within communities, often targeting municipalities that are home to fewer than 20,000 residents.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020-0040-Se
    BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CASE SUMMARY FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION 2022, 2034, 2040 Marion Street & 1408, 1414, 1420 Elmwood Avenue & 2019 Bull Street September 3, 2020 at 4:00 P.M. Case Number: 2020-0040-SE Subject Property: 2022, 2034, 2040 Marion Street & 1408, 1414, 1420 Elmwood Avenue & 2019 Bull Street (TMS#s 09016-07-01, -02, -03, -04, -06, -17 & -18) Zoning District: C-3 (General Commercial District), -DD (City Center Design/Development District) Applicant: Florence Abrenica, GeenbergFarrow Property Owner: Brownstein Associates, LLC Summary Prepared: July 13, 2020 Requested Action: Special exception to permit a gasoline service station and convenience store Applicable Sections of Zoning Ordinance: §17-258 Gasoline Service Stations (SIC 554) permitted in C-3 districts by special exception §17-258 Convenience Stores (SIC 541.1) permitted in the C-3 districts by special exception §17-297 Additional criteria and standards for special exception approval of convenience stores §17-112 Standard criteria for special exceptions Case History: N/A Staff Comments: The applicant is requesting a special exception to permit a gasoline service station and a special exception to permit convenience store on the parcel. The special exceptions will be reviewed together but voted on individually. Part I: The applicant is requesting a special exception to permit a gasoline service station. The subject property consists of seven commercially developed lots. Once the lots are combined, the proposed property will be +/- 1.7-acres. Applicant intends to construct a ten (10) pump fuel dispenser with canopy. Part II: The applicant is also requesting a special exception to permit a convenience store.
    [Show full text]