Anatolian Peninsula Map

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Anatolian Peninsula Map Anatolian peninsula map Continue From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository Jump to jump navigation in search of English: Ancient Anatolian maps. Anatolia is a geographical region bordered by the Black Sea to the north, the Mediterranean Sea to the south, the Aegean Sea to the west, and much of mainland Asia to the east. Anatolia consists mostly of modern Turkey. Asian part of Turkey For other uses, see Anatolia (disambiguation). Asia Minor redirects here. For other uses, see Asia Kecil (disambiguation). Asia Turkey redirects here. It will not be confused with Turkey in Asia. Anatolian Traditional Definition of Anatolia in modern Turkey, excluding most of Southeast and Eastern Anatolian Regions[1][2]GeographyLocation Western Asia Coordinates39°N 35°E / 39°N 35°E / 39; 35Coordinate: 39°N 35°E/39°N 35°E/39; 35Area756,000 km2 (292,000 sq mi)[3](included. Southeast and Eastern Anatolian Regions)AdministrationTurkeyLargest cityAnkara (pop. 5,700,000[4])DemographicdemonymAnatolianLanguagesTurkish, Kurdish, Armenian, Greek, Kabardian, various other Ethnic groupsTurks, Kurds, Armenians, Greeks, Assyrians, Laz, various other informationTime zoneFET (UTC+3) Anatolia[a] is a major peninsula in Western Asia and the westernmost bulge of the Asian continent. It makes up the majority of modern Turkey. It is bordered by the Turkish Channel to the northwest, the Black Sea to the north, the Armenian Highlands (part of the Eastern Anatolian Region) to the east, the Southeast Anatolian Region (which borders Iraq and Syria) to the southeast, the Mediterranean Sea to the south, and the Aegean Sea to the west. The Marmara Sea forms the link between the Black and Aegean seas through the Bosphorus and Dardanelles straits and separates Anatolia from Thrace on the Balkan peninsula of Southeast Europe. Anatolia's eastern border has been held to be the line between Alexandretta Bay and the Black Sea, bordered by the Armenian Highlands to the east and Mesopotamia to the southeast. Today, however, Anatolia is often considered synonymous with Asian Turks; [5] Its eastern and southeastern borders were widely taken to become Turkey's eastern border. [6] [7] [8] The ancient Anatolians spoke the now extinct Anatolian language of the Indo-European language family, which was largely replaced by Greek from classical antiquity and during the Hellenistic, Roman, and Byzantine periods. Major Anatolian languages include Hittite, Luwian, and Lydian, while other untested local languages include Phrygian and Mysian. The Hurro-Urartia language was used in the southeastern kingdom of Mitanni, while Galatians, Celtic, were used in Galatia, central Anatolia. Anatolian Turkification began under the Seljuk Empire in the late 11th century and continued under the Ottomans between the late 13th and early 20th centuries. However, various non-Turkish languages continue to be spoken by minorities in Anatolia today, including Kurdish, Neo-Syrian, Armenian, Arabic, Laz, Georgian and Greek. Other ancient people in the region included galatians, Hurrias, Assyrians, Hattians, Cimmerians, as well as Ionian, Dorian and Aeolic Greeks. Main Article Geography: Geography of Turkey Location Turkey (in rectangle) refers to continental Europe. Anatolia roughly corresponds to the Asian part of the 1907 Turkish map of Asia Minor, which shows local ancient kingdoms, including the Eastern Aegean Islands and the island of Cyprus. [dubious - discuss] Traditionally, Anatolia was considered to extend east to the infinite line that runs from Alexandretta Bay to the Black Sea,[9] comtermining the Anatolian Highlands. This traditional geographical definition is used, for example, in the latest edition of the Merriam-Webster Geographic Dictionary. [1] Under this definition, Anatolia was bounded to the east by the Armenian Highlands, and the Euphrates before the river bowed to the southeast to enter Mesopotamia. [2] To the southeast, it is limited by the range separating it from the Orontes valley in Syria and the Plains of Mesopotamia. [2] After the Armenian genocide, Ottoman Armenia was renamed East Anatolia by the newly established Turkish government. [11] Vazken Davidian cited the expanded use of Anatolia to apply to what was formerly referred to as Armenia as an ahistoric imposition, and noted that the literary body grew uncomfortable with referring to the Ottoman East as Eastern Anatolia. The highest mountain in Eastern Anatolia (in the Armenian Highlands) is Mount Ararat (5123 m). [13] The Euphrates, Araxes, Karasu, and Murat rivers connect the Armenian Highlands to the South Caucasus and the Upper Euphrates Valley. Along with Çoruh, these rivers are the longest in Eastern Anatolia. [14] The etymology of the Anatolian English name comes from the Greek (Anatolḗ) meaning East because from the Greek point of view Anatolia is an area that stretches to the east. The Greek word refers to the direction in which the sun rises, from the direction in which the sun rises, comparable to terms in other a-a-midnaḥ from the to rise, to shine. [15] Exact references to the term have varied over time, perhaps initially referring to the Aeolian, Ionian and Dorian coloniesמaמ aa-mizraḥ 'east' from the to rise, to shine, Aramמ languages such as levant of the Latin levo 'to rise', orient of the Latin orior 'to appear, to begin', Hebrew on the west coast of Asia Minor. In the Byzantine Empire, the Anatolic Theme (A.D.) was a theme that included the west and part of turkey's central Anatolian Region today, centered around Iconium, but ruled from the city of Amorium. [17] The term Anatolia, with its s ending, may have been a Medieval Latin innovation. [16] The modern Turkish form of Anadolu is derived directly from the Greek name Aνατολa (Anatolḗ). The names anatoly Russian, French Anatole and plain Anatol are all derived from the saints Anatolius of Laodicea (d. 283) and Anatolius of Constantinople (d. 458; The First Patriarch of Constantinople), shared the same linguistic origin. The oldest known Reference Name for Anatolia - as the Land of Hatti - appeared on mesopotamian cuneiform tablets from the Akkadian Imperial period (2350–2150 BC). [Citation needed] The first recorded Greek name used for the Anatolian peninsula, though not very popular at the time, was Asía,[19] perhaps from the Akkadian expression for sunrise, or perhaps the name of the Assuwa league in western Anatolia. [Citation needed] The Romans used it as the name of their province, which consisted of the west of the peninsula plus the nearby Aegean islands. When the Asian name expanded its scope to be applied to a wider area in the east of the Mediterranean, some Greeks in the Late Antiquities came to use the name Asia Minor (Μικρὰ, Mikrà Asía), meaning Smaller Asia, to refer to present-day Anatolia, while the Imperial administration prefers the description of The East Anatolḗ. Endonym Of The Roman Empire is understood to be another name for the province by the invading Seljuq Turks, who founded the Sultanate of Rûm in 1077. Thus (the land) of Rûm became another name for Anatolia. By the 12th century Europeans had begun to refer to Anatolia as Turchia. [20] During the Ottoman Empire, mapmakers outside the Empire referred to the mountainous highlands of eastern Anatolia as Armenian. Another contemporary source is called the same area of Kurdistan. [21] Geographers have used various eastern Anatolian highland terms and the Armenian highlands to refer to the region, although the area covered by each term largely overlaps with the others. According to archaeologist Lori Khatchadourian, these terminological differences are primarily the result of a shift in political wealth and the cultural trajectory of the region since the nineteenth century. [22] Turkey's First Geographical Congress in 1941 created two geographical regions of Turkey to the east of the Black Sea Gulf line named The Eastern Anatolian Region and the Southeast Anatolian Region,[23] which were previously largely in line with the western part of the Armenian Highlands, the latter to the northern part of the Mesopotamian plain. According to Richard Hovannisian, this toponim change is necessary to armenia's presence as part of a genocide denial campaign started by the newly established Turkish government and what hovannisian calls its foreign collaborators. [24] More information: Geographical name changes in the Turkish Historical Mural of aurochs, deer, and humans at Çatalhöyük, which is the largest and most preserved Neolithic site found to date. The site was listed as a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 2012. [25] The Sphinx Gate at Hattusa, the capital of the Hittite Empire. The history of the city dates back to before 2000 BC. Main article: History of Anatolian Prehistoric Main Article: Prehistory of anatolian human dwellings in Anatolia comes from paleolithic. [26] Neolithic Anatolia has been proposed as the homeland of Indo-European-speaking families, although language experts tend to like its later origins in the steppes north of the Black Sea. However, it is clear that the Anatolian language, the earliest proven Branch of Indo-Europe, has been used in Anatolia since at least the 19th century BC. [Citation needed] Ancient Near East (Bronze and Iron Age) Hattians and Hurrians The earliest historical records of Anatolia originated in the southeastern region and originated from the Mesopotamian-based Akkadian Empire during the reign of Sargon Akkad in the 24th century BC. Scholars generally believe the earliest indigenous populations of Anatolia were hattians and Hurrians. The Hattians spoke
Recommended publications
  • First Capitals of Armenia and Georgia: Armawir and Armazi (Problems of Early Ethnic Associations)
    First Capitals of Armenia and Georgia: Armawir and Armazi (Problems of Early Ethnic Associations) Armen Petrosyan Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography, Yerevan The foundation legends of the first capitals of Armenia and Georgia – Armawir and Armazi – have several common features. A specific cult of the moon god is attested in both cities in the triadic temples along with the supreme thunder god and the sun god. The names of Armawir and Armazi may be associated with the Anatolian Arma- ‘moon (god).’ The Armenian ethnonym (exonym) Armen may also be derived from the same stem. The sacred character of cultic localities is extremely enduring. The cults were changed, but the localities kept their sacred character for millennia. At the transition to a new religious system the new cults were often simply imposed on the old ones (e.g., the old temple was renamed after a new deity, or the new temple was built on the site or near the ruins of the old one). The new deities inherited the characteristics of the old ones, or, one may say, the old cults were simply renamed, which could have been accompanied by some changes of the cult practices. Evidently, in the new system more or less comparable images were chosen to replace the old ones: similarity of functions, rituals, names, concurrence of days of cult, etc (Petrosyan 2006: 4 f.; Petrosyan 2007a: 175).1 On the other hand, in the course of religious changes, old gods often descend to the lower level of epic heroes. Thus, the heroes of the Armenian ethnogonic legends and the epic “Daredevils of Sasun” are derived from ancient local gods: e.g., Sanasar, who obtains the 1For numerous examples of preservation of pre-Urartian and Urartian holy places in medieval Armenia, see, e.g., Hmayakyan and Sanamyan 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • IMPACT of a MILITARISTIC SOCIETY: a STUDY on the HITTITES by Amber N. Hawley Submitted to the Faculty of the Archaeological Stud
    IMPACT OF A MILITARISTIC SOCIETY: A STUDY ON THE HITTITES By Amber N. Hawley Submitted to the Faculty of The Archaeological Studies Program Department of Sociology and Archaeology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science University of Wisconsin – La Crosse 2012 Copyright © 2012 by Amber N. Hawley All rights reserved ii THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF A MILITARISTIC SOCIETY: A STUDY ON THE HITTITES Amber N. Hawley, B.S. University of Wisconsin-La Crosse, 2012 The purpose of this study is to better understand the relationship between the military, the economy, and the societal collapse of the Hittites, a militaristic society. The Hittite empire suffered from many problems near the end of its existence, but this research supports the idea that the military‟s demand for subsistence goods was too great for the economy to provide. By analyzing historical documentation, many aspects of the Hittite culture can be examined, such as trade networks as well as military campaign reports. The study also looks at the archaeological excavations of Hattusa, the Hittite capital, and Kaman-Kalehöyük, a supply city that would restock the campaigning military. By examining these cities and historical documentation, better understanding of the economy and military will be attained for militaristic societies; and in the case of the Hittites, their relationship to the societal collapse is determined to be strong. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I would like to thank my advisors, Dr. David Anderson and Dr. Mark Chavalas for providing me with feedback throughout my research. I would also like to thank my reading group, which consisted of Mitchell Johnson and Maximilian Pschorr for giving me great advice.
    [Show full text]
  • History, Archaeology, Ethnology ისტორია, არქეოლოგია, ეთნოლოგია
    HISTORY, ARCHAEOLOGY, ETHNOLOGY ისტორია, არქეოლოგია, ეთნოლოგია POLITICAL UNIFICATION OF THE EAST PERIPHERYES OF HITTITES – FOR SEARCHING OF ISMIRIKA ხეთების აღმოსავლეთ პერიფერიის პოლიტიკური გაერთიანების – ისმირიქას კვლევისათვის Charekishvili Nino Professor, Georgian Institute of Public Affairs (GIPA) Gorgasali street #101, Tbilisi, Georgia ORCID: 0000-0002-9568-2926 [email protected] Abstract: The article discusses one of the important geographical points of the political units on the Eastern Periphery of Hittites, this is Ismirika. Especially it’s important to mention here the Ismirika’s Treaty, which the king of Hittites made with the people of Ismirika. The Treaty is published in the series of KUB and ABot, these texts and fragments are preserved in the Boğazköy archive. The innovation is the fact that Ismirika’s special research was carried out for the first time. History of Hittites is discussed based on the Georgian translation and analyses of Ismirika’s Treaty and presents the controversial issues of this period in a new way. The article analyzes the issue of dating the Treaty, either it is related to the reign of the king - Arnuwanda I or Arnuwanda II. We have tried to bring additional arguments and facts about the possibility that military operations in South-East Anatolia are associated with the name Arnuwanda I and the Treaty with Ismirika is signed by him. In the article we are talking about the approximate location, toponymy, etymology and other important issues of Ismirika, according to which it is stated the opinion regarding its relation with historical Speri. This opinion once again states the idea that Ismirika might be one of the states of Kaskians-Mushki, settled by Kartvelian tribes.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study on the Sea Names of the Korean and Anatolian Peninsulas
    A study on the sea names of the Korean and Anatolian peninsulas KIM Shin* 1 1. Introduction This paper aims to comparatively analyze the seas of Turkey and the seas of Korea. Geographically, there are a number of similarities between Turkey's Anatolian Peninsula and the Korean Peninsula. First, the two peninsulas are similar in shape; although Anatolian Peninsula is larger in size, similarities can be found in terms of the climate and natural conditions. Second, to the extent of being referred to as brother nations, Turkey and Korea share many similarities even in terms of the customs and ethnicity. Third, whereas Anatolian Peninsula is located at the western end of the Eurasian continent, Korean Peninsula is located at the eastern end of the Eurasian continent; the two peninsulas are at the eastern and western ends of the Eurasian continent. Fourth, the two peninsulas play the roles of being the starting point and the terminus of the Silk Road. Fifth, due to geographical environment, the two peninsulas historically have been active in trades with neighboring countries and, even now, trading is at the center of the industry for the two nations. Sixth, Anatolian Peninsula is surrounded by many nations, including Greece, Russia, Bulgaria, Syria, etc.; on the other hand, Korean Peninsula borders with Japan, Russia, North Korea and China. Seventh, Anatolian Peninsula is surrounded on three sides by seas: the Black Sea, Aegean Sea and the Mediterranean Sea. Korean Peninsula is surrounded by the South China Sea, Yellow Sea and the East Sea. * Professor, Kyung Hee University, Korea 221 KIM Shin Based on the views limited to seas, there are differences between the two peninsulas: the designations of seas offer differences.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNEX O Cultural Heritage Site Assessment Report
    ANNEX O Cultural Heritage Site Assessment Report HEMA Hard Coal Mine Project HA1144 Final Draft ESIA Report September 2015 Amasra HEMA Hard Coal Mine Project Cultural Heritage Assessment Report Sevket Donmez, Ph.D., Assoc. Prof. Ferudun Ozgumus, Ph.D., Assoc. Prof. Ayse Didem Ozger-Bayvas, Art Historian 1 1. INTRODUCTION This report was written on archaeological and archaeologically potential sites of HEMA Hard Coal Mine Project and it was prepared on the demand of ELC Group Consulting & Engineering Inc. a company of Royal Haskoning DHV. All sites and single monuments had their own references which may be found at the end of this report. The report itself was made not only as table based work but also with an archaeological field survey made by Art Historian Ayse Didem Ozger-Bayvas on Jan. 15-17, 2015. She took the photographs as well. In the beginning possible archaeological sites were fixed on the map of 1:25.000 which was provided by ELC Group and referances of these sites obtained scanning major periodicals and books related to the archaeology of the construction site. The minutes of the Ministry of Culture and Tourism, Karabük Regional Council Directorate of Protection of Cultural were of a great help during the work. 2 2. BIBLIOGRAPHY Çilsüleymanoğlu, S. 1999 Kuşkayası, Devran Matbaası, İstanbul Eyice, S. 1965 Küçük Amasra Tarihi ve Eski Eserler Kılavuzu, Milli Eğitim Basımevi, Ankara Evliya Çelebi ? Seyahatname, (1935), İstanbul French, D.H. 1981 Roman Roads and Milestones Asia Minor, Vol. 1-3, British Archaeological Reports, Oxford Ramsay, W.M. 1960 Anadolu’nun Tarihi Coğrafyası, 95, 201, 211, 352, 480, 508, İstanbul Sakaoğlu, N.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Turkey Ondokuz Mayis University International Relations Office Erasmus Office
    REPUBLIC OF TURKEY ONDOKUZ MAYIS UNIVERSITY INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS OFFICE ERASMUS OFFICE SAMSUN GUIDE Samsun is a distinctive and important tourism destination which is home to the thousand year cultural heritage of the Anatolia and the Black Sea Region dating from the time of Amazons to the Ottoman Period. With its natural beauties 1 including streams, waterfalls, lakes and forests, its therapeutic thermal springs, its local architecture, its rich cuisine and rousing festivals, Samsun is a place of great interest. Situated in the northernmost part of Anatolia, along the shores of the Black Sea, the Samsun region comprises a fertile land cut through by the deltas of the Kizilirmak and Yeşilirmak rivers. Samsun (ancient Amisos) was founded on a spot known colloquially as the 'Mesopotamia of the Black Sea'. Administratively it is subdivided into the counties of Alacam, Asarcik, Ayvacik, Bafra, Çarsamba, Havza, Kavak, Ladik, Ondokuzmayis, Salipazari, Tekkekoy, Terme, Vezirkoprü, Yakakent, İlkadım, Canik and Atakum. The city is a hub for rail, air, sea and road transport systems, with easy links to the cities along the Black Sea coast as well as the central parts of Turkey. HISTORY Samsun was one of the important cities of the region which was known as Paphlagonia in antiquity. The earliest settlements in Samsun dates back to the Old Stone Age (Palaeolithic Era) according to the findings from the caves situated to the south of Tekkekoy. Samsun also fostered settlements in the Middle Stone Age (Mesolithic Era) and the New Stone Age (Neolithic Era); and the Dundar Tepe Mound indicates that a civilisation flourished there during the Chalcolithic (Copper) and Bronze ages.
    [Show full text]
  • Amasya Maid of the Mountains
    Amasya Maid of the Mountains Filiz Özdem (İstanbul, 1965) After graduating from the Italian High School she studied philosophy at Istanbul University and went on to take a master’s degree in the same department. Her translations, poems, articles and essays on art have been published in a number of magazines and newspapers, and her essays have been included in several anthologies. She translated the works of Pier Paolo Pasolini, Luigi Malerba, Carlo Collodi, Edmondo de Amicis, Italo Calvino, Gianni Rodari and Lucia Tumiati. She has written numerous catalogue texts for exhibitions at Maltepe Art Gallery, Milli Reasürans Art Gallery, Sevimce Art Gallery and Artisan Art Gallery. She has also prepared monographies of several Turkish cities for Yapı Kredi Publications: Uygarlıklar Kapısı Urfa (2002), Bitek Kent: Balıkesir (2003), Sırtı Dağ, Yüzü Deniz: Mersin (2004), Taşın Belleği: Mardin (2005), Kars: “Beyaz, Uykusuz, Uzakta” (2006), Karaların ve Denizlerin Sultanı İstanbul (2009), Dağların Gazeli Maraş (2010), Denizli: Tanrıların Kutsadığı Vadi (2011) and Aşklar, Savaşlar, Kahramanlar ve Çanakkale [City of Legends and Epics: Çanakkale] (2012); Erciyes’in Rüyası: Kayseri [City of the Caesars: Kayseri] (2013). Publications: Saydam ve Seyirci (poems), Maltepe Art Gallery, 1999; Korku Benim Sahibim (novel), Yapı Kredi Publications, 2007; Düş Hırkası (novel), Yapı Kredi Publications, 2009; Yalan Sureleri (novel), Yapı Kredi Publications, 2010; Rüya Bekleyen Adam (novel), Yapı Kredi Publications, 2013. Beside her novels she is one of the prominent writers in children literature. Ali Konyalı (Istanbul, b. 1960) studied graphic art at Mimar Sinan University and began working as a professional photographer during the same period. He produced multivision shows for the 1985 Anatolian Civilisations exhibition, and these were followed by audiovisual presentations, books and other publications.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Educational Videos Used in History Education on Academic Success
    Journal of Education and e-Learning Research Vol. 5, No. 3, 193-207, 2018 ISSN(E) 2410-9991 / ISSN(P) 2518-0169 DOI: 10.20448/journal.509.2018.53.193.207 The Effect of Educational Videos Used in History Education on Academic Success Sefa YILDIRIM1 1Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen University Faculty of Science and Letters, Department of History, Ağrı-Turkey Abstract The purpose of the research is to examine and assess the videos used in history education. In the study, the academic success levels of the students who received their history education through videos that comprise of voice, text, animation and sound components. Also, answers to the question of whether there is any difference in the academic success levels of students who received their education through video components were looked for, via 50 multiple-choice questions. Furthermore, the views and experiences of students on the topic of the education given were researched through 7 semi-structured qualitative questions. In the research; three short videos used in history education that were prepared in different styles were used. Two of these videos were merged due to them sharing the same topic. The study universe consists of about 400 students at high school (9th grade) level in Ağrı province. The sample was chosen by using purposeful sampling method. According to the acquired findings; history education videos were noted to be of vital contribution to motivation and learning. While it may make it easier to determine which topics and styles cause gaps in learning, the results obtained in this research, it may also contribute greatly to improve and solve these.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Prehistoric Settlement Near Heraclea Pontica on the Western
    DOI: 10.51493/egearkeoloji.811613 ADerg 2021/1, Nisan / April; XXVI:23-46 Araştırma/Research A New Prehistoric Settlement near Heraclea Pontica on the Western Black Sea Coast, İnönü Cave [BATI KARADENİZ KIYISINDA, HERACLEA PONTİKA YAKINLARINDA YENİ BİR PREHİSTORİK YERLEŞİM, İNÖNÜ MAĞARASI] Hamza EKMEN– F. Gülden EKMEN - Ali GÜNEY - Benjamin S. ARBUCKLE – Gökhan MUSTAFAOĞLU – Cemal TUNOĞLU - Caner DİKER – Ercan OKTAN Anahtar Kelimeler Batı Karadeniz Arkeolojisi, Mağara Yerleşimi, Erken Tunç Çağı, Hitit Silahları, Balkan Göçleri. Keywords Western Black Sea Archaeology, Cave Settlement, Early Bronze Age, Hittite Weapons, Balkan Migrations ÖZET Anadolu’nun Batı Karadeniz kıyılarını arkeolojik araştırmalar açısından uzun yıllarıdır ihmal edilmiş- tir. Bölgede yürütülen arkeolojik çalışmaların büyük bir bölümü yüzey araştırmalarından oluşmaktadır. Kastamonu’nun Devrekani ilçesi yakınlarındaki Kınık yerleşiminde yürütülen çalışmalar ve Karadeniz (Kdz.) Ereğli’nin Karadeniz kıyısına yakın bir noktasında bulunan Yassıkaya’da 2000 yılında gerçek- leştirilen tek sezonluk kazı, bölgenin tarihöncesi kültürlerinin anlaşılmasına yönelik veri sağlayan ka- zılar olma özelliklerini uzun yıllar korumuşlardır. 2017 yılında başlayan ve devam etmekte olan İnönü Mağarası kazıları ile birlikte bölgede tabakaya bağlı buluntu elde edilen yerleşimlere bir yenisi eklen- miştir. Bu nedenle, Yassıkaya ve İnönü Mağarası kazıları bölge arkeolojisi açısından önemli bir yere sahiptir. İnönü Mağarası kazıları aynı zamanda Zonguldak ilinde yürütülen ilk çok tabakalı yerleşim
    [Show full text]
  • The Era of Jeremiah: Geography, Regional Politics and Archaeology in the Time of the Prophets
    The Era of Jeremiah: Geography, Regional Politics and Archaeology In the Time of the Prophets I. Geography and Political History during Prophecy of Jeremiah A. Geography (from http://teachmiddleeast.lib.uchicago.edu/) From west to east: Nile River (orange) Eastern Mediterranean (purple) Anatolian Plateau (brown) Arabian Peninsula (red) Mesopotamia (green) Zagros Mountains (yellow) B. Political history during time of Jeremiah 1. Jeremiah’s prophecy spanned about 40 years from A. Begins prophecy in 13th year of King Josiah (abt 627 BCE) B. Finishes in 11th year of King Zedekiah (586 BCE) C. He knows of the destruction of the northern kingdom and predicts the destruction of Judah II Assyria A. Assyria, a major Mesopotamian East Semitic kingdom and empire of the Ancient Near East, ex- isted as an independent state for a period of approximately nineteen centuries, from the 25th century BC to 605 (BC, spanning the mid to Early Bronze Age through to the late Iron Age. (Interestingly, Assyria is mentioned only 3 times in Jeremiah, while Babylon is mentioned 169) 50:17-18 Israel is a scattered sheep, the lions have driven him away; first the king of Assyria hath de- voured him, and last this Nebuchadrezzar king of Babylon hath broken his bones. Therefore thus saith the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel: behold, I will punish the king of Babylon and his land, as I have punished the king of As- syria.) For a further thirteen centuries, from the end of the 7th century BC to the mid-7th century AD, it survived as a geo-political entity, for the most part ruled by foreign powers, although a number of small Neo-Assyrian states such as Assur, Adiabene, Osroene and Hatra arose at different times between the 1st century BC and late 3rd century CE.
    [Show full text]
  • ESKİÇAĞDA ALUCRA Alucra in Ancient History Gökhan KALMIŞ Dr
    Kafkas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi Kafkas University Journal of the Institute of Social Sciences Sonbahar Autumn 2017, Sayı Number 20, 609-618 DOI:10.9775/kausbed.2017.035 Gönderim Tarihi: 11.09.2017 Kabul Tarihi: 22.11.2017 ESKİÇAĞDA ALUCRA Alucra in Ancient History Gökhan KALMIŞ Dr. Atatürk Üniversitesi, Türkiyat Araştırmaları Enstitüsü Türk Tarihi Ana Bilim Dalı Eskiçağ Tarihi Bilim Dalı [email protected] Çalışmanın Türü: Araştırma Öz Giresun’un 131 km. güneydoğusunda yer alan Alucra ilçesinin doğusunda Şiran, batısında Şebinkarahisar, güneyinde Refahiye ve Suşehri, kuzeyinde ise Tirebolu ilçeleri bulunmaktadır. Giresun ilinin kuzey-güney doğrultusunda iç kesimle bağlantısını sağlayan birkaç önemli yol güzergâhı bulunmaktadır. Bunlardan en önemlisi, Roma İmparatorluğu zamanında askeri amaçlı kullanılan Giresun-Şebinkarahisar yoludur. Bu yol, Alucra ilçesi üzerinden Gümüşhane’ye; güneyindeki uzantısıyla da Sivas-Erzincan ve Tokat’a bağlanmaktadır. Bölgede, M.Ö. II. binde Azzi-Hayaşa hâkimiyeti görülmektedir. Azzi-Hayaşa dönemi hakkındaki bilgilerimizi, Hitit kayıtlarından edinmekteyiz. Yine M.Ö. II. binde bölgede Kaşkalar’ın var olduğunu bilmekteyiz. Dağınık topluluklar halinde yaşayan Kaşkalar hakkındaki bilgileri de yine Hitit kayıtlarından öğrenmekteyiz. M.Ö. VIII. yüzyıl ile M.Ö. V. yüzyıl arasındaki dönemde Kimmerler, İskit akınları sebebiyle güney ve batı yönünde göç etmişlerdir. Kimmer yayılım alanı içerisinde, çalışma sahamızın da içerisinde yer aldığı, Doğu Karadeniz Bölgesi de bulunmaktadır. İskitler ise Kimmerler’i takip ederek, Anadolu içlerine girmiştir. Araştırma sahasının Eskiçağ Tarihi ile ilgili, günümüze kadar yapılmış olan çalışmaları oldukça yetersizdir. Yapmış olduğumuz çalışmanın, bölgenin Eskiçağ Tarihine bir nebze de ışık tutacağını umut etmekteyiz. Bölgede yaptığımız yüzey araştırmaları neticesinde tespit ettiğimiz arkeolojik merkezlerdeki veriler, bölgenin İlk Tunç Çağı’ndan itibaren yerleşim gördüğünü göstermektedir.
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Examining Late Chalcolithic Cultural Collapse in South-East Europe Harvey Benjamin Smith University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
    University of Arkansas, Fayetteville ScholarWorks@UARK Theses and Dissertations 5-2013 Re-examining Late Chalcolithic Cultural Collapse in South-East Europe Harvey Benjamin Smith University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, Archaeological Anthropology Commons, and the European History Commons Recommended Citation Smith, Harvey Benjamin, "Re-examining Late Chalcolithic Cultural Collapse in South-East Europe" (2013). Theses and Dissertations. 589. http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/589 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. RE-EXAMINING LATE CHALCOLITHIC CULTURAL COLLAPSE IN SOUTH-EAST EUROPE RE-EXAMINING LATE CHALCOLITHIC CULTURAL COLLAPSE IN SOUTHEAST EUROPE A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Anthropology By Harvey Benjamin Smith Bachelor of Science in Geography, 2008 University of Central Arkansas May 2013 University of Arkansas ABSTRACT Research into the Balkan Chalcolithic often overlooks the dramatic changes in society that occurred beginning in the late Fifth Millennium BCE. Most settlements were abandoned along with changes in mortuary customs, ceramic and decorative traditions, domestic rituals, crafts, housing styles, mining, and metallurgy. These changes happened at a time when these Chalcolithic societies seemed to be at their peak. Theories as to what caused these changes include migrations/invasions, anthropogenic environmental degradation, gradual internal changes through innovation and outside contacts, and climate change.
    [Show full text]