A Cultural Historical Study of Land Use in Dade County, Florida James R

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Cultural Historical Study of Land Use in Dade County, Florida James R Florida International University FIU Digital Commons FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations University Graduate School 4-4-1995 A Cultural Historical Study of Land Use in Dade County, Florida James R. Riach Florida International University, Department of Environmental Studies, [email protected] DOI: 10.25148/etd.FI07091101 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd Part of the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation Riach, James R., "A Cultural Historical Study of Land Use in Dade County, Florida" (1995). FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 1. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/1 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the University Graduate School at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY Miami, Florida A CULTURAL HISTORICAL STUDY OF LAND USE IN DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA A thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS IN COMPARATIVE SOCIOLOGY by James Robert Riach 1995 To: Dean Arthur W. Herriott College of Arts and Sciences This thesis, written by James Robert Riach, and entitled A CULTURAL HISTORICAL STUDY OF LAND USE IN DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, having been approved in respect to style and intellectual content, is referred to your judgement. We have read this thesis and recommend that it be approved. Bradley C. Bennett Alex Stepidk ennis W. Wiedman William T. Vickers, Major Professor Date of Defense: April 4, 1995 The thesis of James Robert Riach is approved. Dean Ar hur W. Herriott Col ge of Arts and Sciences Dr. Richard L. Campbell Dean of Graduate Studies Florida International University, 1995 ii ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS A CULTURAL HISTORICAL STUDY OF LAND USE IN DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA by James Robert Riach Florida International University, 1995 Miami, Florida Professor William T. Vickers, Major Professor Humans have used the land within the area currently defined as Dade County, Florida since around 11,000 B.P., but did not significantly alter the local environment until less than one hundred years ago. These recent changes greatly affected many critical ecological factors, thereby reducing the sustainability of many types of life, including humans. This study explains how land use evolved from earlier sustainable systems for satisfying human needs into the current menacing patterns. This is done by examining the environmental, technological, social, and cognitive contexts of land use through time. Changes in all these areas have followed a general trend leading to increasing intensity of land use and environmental change driven by population growth and technological innovation. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE I. INTRODUCTION .................... ........................ 1 Foreword............................... ................ 1 Dade County ........................................... 2 Land Use and Environmental Problems...................2 The Need for an Anthropological Perspective...........6 History of Ecological Anthropology and Related Theories...................................... 8 Environmental Determinism ........................... 9 Environmental Possibilism.........................13 Environmental Challenge............................14 Culture Area Approach..............................15 Cultural Evolutionism ..............................17 Cultural Ecology..................................19 Ecosystemic Approach ............................... 21 Neo-Darwinian Evolutionary Ecology................22 Adaptive Dynamics ................................. 22 Cultural Materialism..............................24 Concepts of Environmental Risks and Hazards..........26 The Concept of Maladaptation..........................27 Research Design...................................... 29 Methods................................... *.......... 31 The Significance of this Research.................... 34 iv II. ENVIRONMENTAL DESCRIPTION OF DADE COUNTY..............36 Biogeography ......................................... 36 Sea Level Changes....................................37 Climate...............................................41 Physiographic Regions and Geographical Zones.........43 Soils................................................. 47 Vegetation Communities of Physiographic Regions......49 Everglades Region.................................50 Marsh Flora and Fauna...........................59 Tree Island Flora and Fauna....................63 Changes to the Everglades......................64 Miami Rock Ridge Region............................66 Hammock Flora and Fauna.........................68 Pineland Flora and Fauna........................70 Changes to the Miami Rock Ridge................ 71 Biscayne Bay Region .............................. 72 Estuarine Flora and Fauna.......................73 Changes to Biscayne Bay........................ 75 Coastal Region.................................... 76 Mangrove Flora and Fauna....................... 77 Salt Marsh Flora and Fauna .................... 79 Beach Strand Flora and Fauna................... 79 Changes to the Coast........................... 80 Big Cypress Spur Region........................... 82 Cypress Forest Flora and Fauna................. 83 Changes in the Big Cypress Spur................ 84 v Southern Slope Region..................... .... ..... 85 Changes to the Southern Slope .................. 86 Atlantic Ocean Region. ............................ 87 Groundwater .............. ............................ 91 Summary of Chapter .................................. 92 III. THE PRE-COLUMBIAN ERA (14,000 B.P.-A.D. 1512)........94 Overview of the Pre-Columbian Era...................94 Paleo-Indian Period (14,000-8,500 B.P.)............. 98 Environment........................................... 99 Technology........................................... 101 Subsistence Selectivity ....................... 103 Tools ...... .................................... 105 Social Dimension.................................. 105 Cognitive Dimension............................... 106 Archaic Period (8,500-2,500 B.P.) .................. 106 Sites in Dade County.............................. 107 Environment ...................................... 109 Technology............... ......................... 109 Subsistence Selectivity....................... 110 Tools .............. ..... ...................... 112 House Structures .............. ............... 112 Social Dimension..... ............................. 112 Cognitive Dimension............................... 113 Formative Period (2,500 B.P.-A.D. 1512)............ 114 Sites in Dade County... ................ ...........115 vi Technology ......... .. ......................... .119 Coastal Zone Faunal Subsistence............... 120 Habitat-Specific Selectivity ............... 120 Coastal Zone Floral Subsistence...............124 Habitat-Specific Selectivity............... 125 Inland Zone Faunal Subsistence................126 Habitat-Specific Selectivity............... 127 Inland Zone Floral Subsistence................129 Procurement and Use of Flora.................. 130 Procurement and Use of Aquatic Fauna..........131 Sharks ..................................... 131 Rays ....................................... 132 Manatees ................................... 133 Whales ..................................... 133 Small Bony Fish............................ 134 Turtles..................................... 135 Invertebrates..............................135 Procurement and Use of Terrestrial Fauna......136 Deer ....................................... 137 Small Mammals.............................. 137 Tortoises...................................138 Snakes, Alligators, Amphibians, and Birds..138 House Structures...............................138 Social Dimension..................................139 Migratory Patterns............................141 Population................ ... ................ 142 vii Socio-Political Organization...................143 Cognitive Dimension: Religion .................... 145 Summary of Chapter..................................148 IV. PRE-URBAN POST-COLUMBIAN ERA (A.D. 1513-1895)........157 Introduction........................................157 Spanish Contact Period: A.D. 1513-1789.............. 158 Environmental Risks and Hazards .................. 159 Social Dimension: Population and Socio-Political Relations.........................................161 Technology ....................................... 162 Plant and Animal Use.......................... 162 Fishing........................................164 Agriculture and Drainage.......................164 Land Surveys...................................165 Cognitive Dimension: Mythology and Religion......165 Pioneer Settlement Period: A.D. 1790-1895........... 166 Environmental Risks and Hazards .................. 168 Social Dimension..................................170 Settlement.................................... 170 Population .................................... 174 Technology....................................... 174 Subsistence................................... 175 Houses ............................... ......... 177 Transportation..................... .......... 178 Coontie Starch Industry....................... 179 viii Hunting and Trading ........................... 181 Agriculture...................................... 183 Wrecking........................................
Recommended publications
  • University of Michigan Radiocarbon Dates Xii H
    [Ru)Ioc!RBo1, Vol.. 10, 1968, P. 61-114] UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN RADIOCARBON DATES XII H. R. CRANE and JAMES B. GRIFFIN The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan The following is a list of dates obtained since the compilation of List XI in December 1965. The method is essentially the same as de- scribed in that list. Two C02-CS2 Geiger counter systems were used. Equipment and counting techniques have been described elsewhere (Crane, 1961). Dates and estimates of error in this list follow the practice recommended by the International Radiocarbon Dating Conferences of 1962 and 1965, in that (a) dates are computed on the basis of the Libby half-life, 5570 yr, (b) A.D. 1950 is used as the zero of the age scale, and (c) the errors quoted are the standard deviations obtained from the numbers of counts only. In previous Michigan date lists up to and in- cluding VII, we have quoted errors at least twice as great as the statisti- cal errors of counting, to take account of other errors in the over-all process. If the reader wishes to obtain a standard deviation figure which will allow ample room for the many sources of error in the dating process, we suggest doubling the figures that are given in this list. We wish to acknowledge the help of Patricia Dahlstrom in pre- paring chemical samples and David M. Griffin and Linda B. Halsey in preparing the descriptions. I. GEOLOGIC SAMPLES 9240 ± 1000 M-1291. Hosterman's Pit, Pennsylvania 7290 B.C. Charcoal from Hosterman's Pit (40° 53' 34" N Lat, 77° 26' 22" W Long), Centre Co., Pennsylvania.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6 City of North Port Comprehensive Plan ______Recreation & Open Space
    CHAPTER 6 CITY OF NORTH PORT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ____________________________________ RECREATION & OPEN SPACE Recreation and Open Space Element Table of Contents Chapter 6 Recreation & Open Space Page Introduction 6-3 Needs and Priorities 6-4 Relationship to the EAR 6-4 Parks and Recreation Master Plan 6-5 Parks and Recreation Division Recommendations 6-10 Local Option One Percent Infrastructure Surtax 6-11 Myakkahatchee Creek Greenway Master Plan 6-12 Other Recreational Opportunities 6-16 List of Illustrations TABLES 6-1 Parks Inventory 6-18 Goals, Objectives, & Policies 6-21 Maps follow GOP’s Map 6-1 Parks 6-2 Recreation and Open Space Element RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT Introduction The management of City-owned parks, recreational amenities and open space has undergone significant change since the 1997 10-year update of the City of North Port’s Comprehensive Plan. In 1997, the population of North Port was 16,708, by 2008, the City’s population had more than tripled to 56,316 (Bureau of Economic and Business Research estimate). The City’s explosive growth within that period of time is attributable to the large numbers of young families who moved to the City because of its affordable housing and good schools. As a consequence of this continuing trend, the average age of a typical resident has fallen from the 50s to the mid- to late 30s. Under the terms of the City’s 1993 Interlocal Agreement with Sarasota County Government, the City’s recreational programs, activities and facilities had been consolidated and placed under the direction of the County.
    [Show full text]
  • Composite of State of Florida Division of Historic Preservation Office Letter and Cultural Resource Reports
    ATTACHMENT 1 Composite of State of Florida Division of Historic Preservation Office Letter and Cultural Resource Reports Environmental Assessment for the Coral Reef Commons Project Incidental Take Permit Application Frozune Xlspenrli{ENT o RICK SCOTT KEN DETZNER Govemor Secretary of State Mr. Roberl Carr December 9,2015 Archaeological and Historical Conservancv, Inc. 4800 S.W. 64m Ave., Suire 107 Davie, Florida 33314 Re: DHR Project File No.: 2015-5923 / Received by DHR: November 9, 2015 A Phase II Cttltural Resource Assessment of SDA11320, BDAl432l, BDA I 13 22, and SDAI I 3 96. Dade County, Florida Dear Mr. Carr: Our office received and reviewed the above re1'erenced surve), report in accordance rvith Chapters 267 and313 of the Florida Statutes, and the applicable Dacle County ordinances, for possible advLrse impact to cultural resources (any prehistoric or histolrc district, site. building, structure, or object) listed, or eligible for listing, in the National Register of l-listoric places (NRHP). In June and July 2015, Archaeological and Historical Conservancy, Inc. (AFIC) conducted a phase II assessment of the Coral Reef Cornmons parcel on behalf of Johnson Engineering,Inc. AHC investigated resources 8DA14320,SDA14321,8DA14322, and identified archaeological site 8DA14396, It is the opinion of AHC that resources BDAl4321,BDA|4322, and8DA143g6 are eligible forthe NRHP. AHC had insufficient information to determine the eligibility of site 8DA14320. Resources 8DA14320 and 8DA14396 are located within natural areas of the project parcel, and AHC recommends that they are preserved, Based on tlie ir,fonnation providecl, or-rr office finds the submitted report complete and sufficient in accordance rvitllthapter lA-46, Florida Administrative Code.It is our opinion that resources DA14321, 8D4I4322, and 8DA14396 are ineligible for the NRHP.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael O. Woodburne1,* Alberto L. Cione2,**, and Eduardo P. Tonni2,***
    Woodburne, M.O.; Cione, A.L.; and Tonni, E.P., 2006, Central American provincialism and the 73 Great American Biotic Interchange, in Carranza-Castañeda, Óscar, and Lindsay, E.H., eds., Ad- vances in late Tertiary vertebrate paleontology in Mexico and the Great American Biotic In- terchange: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Geología and Centro de Geociencias, Publicación Especial 4, p. 73–101. CENTRAL AMERICAN PROVINCIALISM AND THE GREAT AMERICAN BIOTIC INTERCHANGE Michael O. Woodburne1,* Alberto L. Cione2,**, and Eduardo P. Tonni2,*** ABSTRACT The age and phyletic context of mammals that dispersed between North and South America during the past 9 m.y. is summarized. The presence of a Central American province of cladogenesis and faunal differentiation is explored. One apparent aspect of such a province is to delay dispersals of some taxa northward from Mexico into the continental United States, largely during the Blancan. Examples are recognized among the various xenar- thrans, and cervid artiodactyls. Whereas the concept of a Central American province has been mentioned in past investigations it is upgraded here. Paratoceras (protoceratid artio- dactyl) and rhynchotheriine proboscideans provide perhaps the most compelling examples of Central American cladogenesis (late Arikareean to early Barstovian and Hemphillian to Rancholabrean, respectively), but this category includes Hemphillian sigmodontine rodents, and perhaps a variety of carnivores and ungulates from Honduras in the medial Miocene, as well as peccaries and equids from Mexico. For South America, Mexican canids and hy- drochoerid rodents may have had an earlier development in Mexico. Remarkably, the first South American immigrants to Mexico (after the Miocene heralds; the xenarthrans Plaina and Glossotherium) apparently dispersed northward at the same time as the first Holarctic taxa dispersed to South America (sigmodontine rodents and the tayassuid artiodactyls).
    [Show full text]
  • Jockey Club ——-”A Community Helping to Build a City”
    Jockey Club ——-”a community helping to build a city” Jockey Club of North Port Property Owners’ Association, Inc. A Covenant Protected Community Board of Directors JANUARY—EDITION 2016 VOLUME 38 ISSUE 1 Officers Fred McMahan, Pres 16 David Casarsa, VP 16 Guenter Recknagel, Treasurer ‘18 Bil Carlock, Secretary/ City Liaison ‘16 Loretta Stephenson, Beautification 18 Margarete Haefele, Clarion Editor 16 Bill Iiams 16, Maintenance Director Sean Seward16 CONTENTS Board Meeting ————–—pg 2 Performing Arts———-——-pg 2 Updates ———-———-——pg 2 Did you Know————-——pg 2 Snow Flake Dance—---——pg 3 Important Notice—--——-—-pg 3 Report from City Liaison——pg3 Best Christmas Décor—--—pg 3 Comments President———pg 4 Friends Lttle Salt Springs—-pg 4 Recreation Update————pg 5 Cmmunication Loretta——--pg 5 Booster Page—–——-——-pg 6 Elections——————–-—–pg 7 Info /Volunteer Request—–pg 11 Money Talks——————-pg12 Splash News————–—-pg 12 Election 2016——–———-pg 13 Code Enforcement———--pg 14 This is your Community—--pg 15 THE NEXT CLARION IS OUR FEBRUARY ISSUE Our Board meetings are very interesting! Come and check it out. Page2 2 We are free. We are the Board of members of 2016 North Port Performing Arts Events the Jockey Club. We run this Club. You voted us North Port Performing Arts Association tick- in. We have succeeded in taking back our Club. ets may be purchased by calling the box of- Things went smoothly, and we are ironing out the fice at 426-8479 or 866-406-7722, or by going wrinkles. There are many deficiencies, worn out between 10am-1pm and one hour prior to the equipment, and disarrayed files which we have in house box office.
    [Show full text]
  • Restoring Southern Florida's Native Plant Heritage
    A publication of The Institute for Regional Conservation’s Restoring South Florida’s Native Plant Heritage program Copyright 2002 The Institute for Regional Conservation ISBN Number 0-9704997-0-5 Published by The Institute for Regional Conservation 22601 S.W. 152 Avenue Miami, Florida 33170 www.regionalconservation.org [email protected] Printed by River City Publishing a division of Titan Business Services 6277 Powers Avenue Jacksonville, Florida 32217 Cover photos by George D. Gann: Top: mahogany mistletoe (Phoradendron rubrum), a tropical species that grows only on Key Largo, and one of South Florida’s rarest species. Mahogany poachers and habitat loss in the 1970s brought this species to near extinction in South Florida. Bottom: fuzzywuzzy airplant (Tillandsia pruinosa), a tropical epiphyte that grows in several conservation areas in and around the Big Cypress Swamp. This and other rare epiphytes are threatened by poaching, hydrological change, and exotic pest plant invasions. Funding for Rare Plants of South Florida was provided by The Elizabeth Ordway Dunn Foundation, National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, and the Steve Arrowsmith Fund. Major funding for the Floristic Inventory of South Florida, the research program upon which this manual is based, was provided by the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation and the Steve Arrowsmith Fund. Nemastylis floridana Small Celestial Lily South Florida Status: Critically imperiled. One occurrence in five conservation areas (Dupuis Reserve, J.W. Corbett Wildlife Management Area, Loxahatchee Slough Natural Area, Royal Palm Beach Pines Natural Area, & Pal-Mar). Taxonomy: Monocotyledon; Iridaceae. Habit: Perennial terrestrial herb. Distribution: Endemic to Florida. Wunderlin (1998) reports it as occasional in Florida from Flagler County south to Broward County.
    [Show full text]
  • Testing a Model to Investigate Calusa Salvage of 16Th- and Early-17Th-Century Spanish Shipwrecks
    THEY ARE RICH ONLY BY THE SEA: TESTING A MODEL TO INVESTIGATE CALUSA SALVAGE OF 16TH- AND EARLY-17TH-CENTURY SPANISH SHIPWRECKS by Kelsey Marie McGuire B.A., Mercyhurst University, 2007 A thesis submitted to the Department of Anthropology College of Arts, Social Sciences, and Humanities The University of West Florida In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts 2014 The thesis of Kelsey McGuire is approved: ____________________________________________ _________________ Amy Mitchell-Cook, Ph.D., Committee Member Date ____________________________________________ _________________ Gregory Cook, Ph.D., Committee Member Date ____________________________________________ _________________ Marie-Therese Champagne, Ph.D., Committee Member Date ____________________________________________ _________________ John Worth, Ph.D., Committee Chair Date Accepted for the Department/Division: ____________________________________________ _________________ John R. Bratten, Ph.D., Chair Date Accepted for the University: ____________________________________________ _________________ Richard S. Podemski, Ph.D., Dean, Graduate School Date ! ACKNOWLEDGMENTS If not for the financial, academic, and moral support of dozens of people and research institutions, I could not have seen this project to completion. I would not have taken the first steps without financial support from Dr. Elizabeth Benchley and the UWF Archaeology Institute, the UWF Student Government Association. In addition, this project was supported by a grant from the University of West Florida through the Office of Research and Sponsored Programs. Their generous contributions afforded the opportunity to conduct my historical research in Spain. The trip was also possible through of the logistical support of Karen Mims. Her help at the Archaeology Institute was invaluable then and throughout my time at UWF. Thank you to my research companion, Danielle Dadiego.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 August 6, 2013 VITA JOHN C. WHITTAKER Personal Information
    1 August 6, 2013 VITA JOHN C. WHITTAKER Personal Information Born: September 6, 1953, Richland, Washington Married: Kathryn Kamp Citizenship: USA Dept. of Anthropology Grinnell College Grinnell, IA 50112-0806 641-269-3447 [email protected] Degrees B.A. (1975) Cornell University, cum laude in Anthropology M.A. (1979) University of Arizona, Anthropology PhD. (1984) University of Arizona, Anthropology Dissertation Title: Arrowheads and Artisans: Stone Tool Manufacture and Individual Variation at Grasshopper Pueblo Honors and Grants - New York State Regents Scholarship 1971-1975 - University of Arizona Graduate Research Development Fund Grant 1980 - Comins Fellowship 1981 (Univ. of Arizona, Anthro Dept) - Agnese N. Lindley Foundation: grant in support of Grinnell College Archaeological Field School, 1985 field season - Grinnell College Grant Board Faculty Research Grants yearly since 1987. - Sloan Foundation/Grinnell College Technology Concentration grants to support Bronze Technology experiments in Prehistory class 1988, 1991 - Matching Challenge Grants from Coconino National Forest in support of 1992 and 1994 Archaeological Field Schools - World Atlatl Association Top 10 Award, 2000, 2001, 2006 - Henry Luce Foundation research grant “Four Thousand Years of Environmental Change in a Maya Forest” $500,000 to support five year teaching/research project, with D. Campbell, K. Kamp, 2001 - World Atlatl Association President’s Award, 2012 Teaching Experience Department of Anthropology, Grinnell College, Grinnell, Iowa. Professor, May 2001
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resource Assessment Survey
    CULTURAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT SURVEY FOR THE SEIR FOR WIDENING U.S. 301 FROM FALKENBURG ROAD TO CAUSEWAY BOULEVARD Hillsborough County, Florida Prepared for Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 10117 Princess Palm Ave Suite 300 Tampa, Florida 33610 Prepared by Janus Research 1300 N. Westshore Boulevard, Suite 100 Tampa, Florida 33607 FINAL REPORT CRAS for the SEIR for Widening U.S. 301 from Falkenburg Road to Causeway Boulevard Hillsborough County November 2006 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Cultural Resource Assessment Survey (CRAS) for the State Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) for Widening U.S. 301 from Falkenburg Road to Causeway Boulevard in Hillsborough County, Florida was undertaken at the request of Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. The objective of this survey, which was conducted in November, 2006, was to identify cultural resources within or adjacent to the project area and assess their eligibility for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) according to the criteria set forth in 36 CFR Section 60.4. This assessment was designed and implemented to comply with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) of 1966 (as amended) as implemented by 36 CFR 800 (Protection of Historic Properties, effective January 2001); Section 102 of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended (42 USC 4321 et seq.), as implemented by the regulations of the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) (40 CFR Parts 1500–1508); Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966, as amended (49 USC 303); Chapter 267, Florida Statutes; and the minimum field methods, data analysis, and reporting standards embodied in the Florida Division of Historical Resources’ (FDHR) Cultural Resource Management Standards and Operational Manual (February 2003), and Chapter 1A-46 (Archaeological and Historical Report Standards and Guidelines), Florida Administrative Code.
    [Show full text]
  • Page/Ladson (8Je591) : Excavation of an Early Holocene Occupation Site
    PAGE/LADSON (8JE591): EXCAVATION OF AN EARLY HOLOCENE OCCUPATION SITE IN THE AUCILLA RIVER, FLORIDA By BRINNEN S. CARTER A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2003 ' r Copyright 2003 by Brinnen S. Carter This document is dedicated to my dead father, Brinly Stewart Carter. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS There are many people who deserve the largest measure of thanks for their patience and support. On the intellectual side, S. David Webb and James (Jim) Dunbar are first and foremost. The Florida Department of State Special Category grants, National Geographic grants, and numerous private donations of money, time, and equipment, to the Aucilla River Prehistory Project, lead by Drs. Webb and Milanich paid for the fieldwork. Grants and salary from the Aucilla River Prehistory Project and discussions with Jim Dunbar have been important in directing the work that follows. Discussions with David Anderson (modeling Paleoindian/Early Archaic American Indian bands and macrobands), Albert Goodyear (tool technology and chronology), Jerald Milanich (hypothesis generation and testing), Louis Tesar (overall Florida Paleoindian site distribution and nature) have also contributed to the quality of work. One could hardly ask for a better archaeology faculty than the University of Florida's for understanding the breadth of New World Archaeology. The archaeology faculty of Florida State University—and especially Rochelle Marrinan—helped me keep my dignity while completing the dissertation. Teaching at FSU added notches to my resume and gave me a better understanding of the pressures under which university-based researchers work.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1: the Everglades to the 1920S Introduction
    Chapter 1: The Everglades to the 1920s Introduction The Everglades is a vast wetland, 40 to 50 miles wide and 100 miles long. Prior to the twentieth century, the Everglades occupied most of the Florida peninsula south of Lake Okeechobee.1 Originally about 4,000 square miles in extent, the Everglades included extensive sawgrass marshes dotted with tree islands, wet prairies, sloughs, ponds, rivers, and creeks. Since the 1880s, the Everglades has been drained by canals, compartmentalized behind levees, and partially transformed by agricultural and urban development. Although water depths and flows have been dramatically altered and its spatial extent reduced, the Everglades today remains the only subtropical ecosystem in the United States and one of the most extensive wetland systems in the world. Everglades National Park embraces about one-fourth of the original Everglades plus some ecologically distinct adjacent areas. These adjacent areas include slightly elevated uplands, coastal mangrove forests, and bays, notably Florida Bay. Everglades National Park has been recognized as a World Heritage Site, an International Biosphere Re- serve, and a Wetland of International Importance. In this work, the term Everglades or Everglades Basin will be reserved for the wetland ecosystem (past and present) run- ning between the slightly higher ground to the east and west. The term South Florida will be used for the broader area running from the Kississimee River Valley to the toe of the peninsula.2 Early in the twentieth century, a magazine article noted of the Everglades that “the region is not exactly land, and it is not exactly water.”3 The presence of water covering the land to varying depths through all or a major portion of the year is the defining feature of the Everglades.
    [Show full text]
  • Variable Impact of Late-Quaternary Megafaunal Extinction in Causing
    Variable impact of late-Quaternary megafaunal SPECIAL FEATURE extinction in causing ecological state shifts in North and South America Anthony D. Barnoskya,b,c,1, Emily L. Lindseya,b, Natalia A. Villavicencioa,b, Enrique Bostelmannd,2, Elizabeth A. Hadlye, James Wanketf, and Charles R. Marshalla,b aDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720; bMuseum of Paleontology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720; cMuseum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720; dRed Paleontológica U-Chile, Laboratoria de Ontogenia, Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Chile; eDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305; and fDepartment of Geography, California State University, Sacramento, CA 95819 Edited by John W. Terborgh, Duke University, Durham, NC, and approved August 5, 2015 (received for review March 16, 2015) Loss of megafauna, an aspect of defaunation, can precipitate many megafauna loss, and if so, what does this loss imply for the future ecological changes over short time scales. We examine whether of ecosystems at risk for losing their megafauna today? megafauna loss can also explain features of lasting ecological state shifts that occurred as the Pleistocene gave way to the Holocene. We Approach compare ecological impacts of late-Quaternary megafauna extinction The late-Quaternary impact of losing 70–80% of the megafauna in five American regions: southwestern Patagonia, the Pampas, genera in the Americas (19) would be expected to trigger biotic northeastern United States, northwestern United States, and Berin- transitions that would be recognizable in the fossil record in at gia. We find that major ecological state shifts were consistent with least two respects.
    [Show full text]