DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Election Campaign Laws

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Election Campaign Laws FEDERAL ELECTION CAMPAIGN LAWS Compiled by the FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION FEBRUARY 2019 FEDERAL ELECTION CAMPAIGN LAWS Compiled by the FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION PREFACE The Federal Election Commission (FEC) has prepared this compilation of Federal campaign laws as an informative service to the general public. There are three major sections of this compilation: 1. FEDERAL ELECTION CAMPAIGN LAWS: The text of the “Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) of 1971,” as amended, the “Presidential Election Campaign Fund Act,” as amended, and the “Presidential Primary Matching Payment Account Act,” as amended, as codified in titles 52 and 26 of the United States Code. (See Amendments in THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 1974, 1976, 1977, 1979, 1981, 1983, 1984, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1999, 2000, 2002, 2004, 2005, 2007, 2008, 2013, 2014 and WASHINGTON, D.C. 20463 2018: Pub. L. No. 93-443, Pub. L. No. 94-283, Pub. L. No. 95-216, Pub. L. No. 96-187, Pub. L. No. 97-51, Pub. L. No. 98-63, Pub. L. No. 98-355, Pub. COMMISSIONERS L. No. 98-620, Pub. L. No. 100-352, Pub. L. No. 101-194, Pub. L. No. 101- 280, Pub. L. No. 102-90, Pub. L. No. 102-393, Pub. L. No. 103-66, Pub. L. ELLEN L. WEINTRAUB, Chair No. 103-272, Pub. L. No. 104-79, Pub. L. No. 104-88, Pub. L. No. 104-287, MATTHEW S. PETERSEN, Vice Chairman Pub. L. No. 106-58, Pub. L. No. 106-346, Pub. L. No. 107-155, Pub. L. No. 107-252, Pub. L. No. 108-199, Pub. L. No. 108-447, Pub. L. No. 109-115, CAROLINE C. HUNTER, Commissioner Pub. L. No. 110-5, Pub. L. No. 110-81, Pub. L. No. 110-433, Pub. L. No. 113- STEVEN T. WALTHER, Commissioner 72, Pub. L. No. 113-94, Pub. L. No. 113-235, Pub. L. No. 115-141, Pub. L. No. 115-244, and Pub. L. No. 115-386, respectively.) SECOND EDITION, FEBRUARY 2019 2. APPENDIX: The text of additional provisions of the United States Code, which are not in the FECA but may be relevant to persons involved with Federal elections, current through February 2019. 3. INDEX TO TITLES 52 and 26: A special index prepared by the FEC. This compilation is presented in codified form, with FECA section numbers converted to United States Code section numbers, in order to facilitate cross- references between this pamphlet, the United States Code, and the United States Code Annotated. Readers should be aware that some terms in the law are defined differently in different titles. Thus, the meaning of a particular term may not be consistent throughout this pamphlet. Note, therefore, the definitions provided in each title or section. PREFACE The Federal Election Commission (FEC) has prepared this compilation of Federal campaign laws as an informative service to the general public. There are three major sections of this compilation: 1. FEDERAL ELECTION CAMPAIGN LAWS: The text of the “Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) of 1971,” as amended, the “Presidential Election Campaign Fund Act,” as amended, and the “Presidential Primary Matching Payment Account Act,” as amended, as codified in titles 52 and 26 of the United States Code. (See Amendments in THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 1974, 1976, 1977, 1979, 1981, 1983, 1984, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1999, 2000, 2002, 2004, 2005, 2007, 2008, 2013, 2014 and WASHINGTON, D.C. 20463 2018: Pub. L. No. 93-443, Pub. L. No. 94-283, Pub. L. No. 95-216, Pub. L. No. 96-187, Pub. L. No. 97-51, Pub. L. No. 98-63, Pub. L. No. 98-355, Pub. COMMISSIONERS L. No. 98-620, Pub. L. No. 100-352, Pub. L. No. 101-194, Pub. L. No. 101- 280, Pub. L. No. 102-90, Pub. L. No. 102-393, Pub. L. No. 103-66, Pub. L. ELLEN L. WEINTRAUB, Chair No. 103-272, Pub. L. No. 104-79, Pub. L. No. 104-88, Pub. L. No. 104-287, MATTHEW S. PETERSEN, Vice Chairman Pub. L. No. 106-58, Pub. L. No. 106-346, Pub. L. No. 107-155, Pub. L. No. 107-252, Pub. L. No. 108-199, Pub. L. No. 108-447, Pub. L. No. 109-115, CAROLINE C. HUNTER, Commissioner Pub. L. No. 110-5, Pub. L. No. 110-81, Pub. L. No. 110-433, Pub. L. No. 113- STEVEN T. WALTHER, Commissioner 72, Pub. L. No. 113-94, Pub. L. No. 113-235, Pub. L. No. 115-141, Pub. L. No. 115-244, and Pub. L. No. 115-386, respectively.) SECOND EDITION, FEBRUARY 2019 2. APPENDIX: The text of additional provisions of the United States Code, which are not in the FECA but may be relevant to persons involved with Federal elections, current through February 2019. 3. INDEX TO TITLES 52 and 26: A special index prepared by the FEC. This compilation is presented in codified form, with FECA section numbers converted to United States Code section numbers, in order to facilitate cross- references between this pamphlet, the United States Code, and the United States Code Annotated. Readers should be aware that some terms in the law are defined differently in different titles. Thus, the meaning of a particular term may not be consistent throughout this pamphlet. Note, therefore, the definitions provided in each title or section. III FEDERAL ELECTION CAMPAIGN LAWS Copies of this compilation are available from the Federal Election Commission, 1050 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20463. IV Copies of this compilation are available from the Federal Election UNITED STATES CODE Commission, 1050 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20463. EDITORIAL RECLASSIFICATION TABLE TITLE 52 — VOTING AND ELECTIONS This table tracks the relocation of federal campaign finance laws from title 2 to title 52 of the U.S. Code, effective September 1, 2014. United States Code Former New Provision of Law Affected Classification Classification Pub. L. 92-225, title III, § 301, Feb. 7, 1972, 86 2:431 52:30101 Stat. 11 Pub. L. 107-155, title IV, § 402, Mar. 27, 2002, 2:431 note 52:30101 note 116 Stat. 112 Pub. L. 106-346, § 101(a) [title V, § 502(d)], 2:431 note 52:30101 note Oct. 23, 2000, 114 Stat. 1356, 1356A-50 Pub. L. 96-187, title III, § 301, Jan. 8, 1980, 93 2:431 note 52:30101 note Stat. 1368 Pub. L. 93-443, title IV, § 410, Oct. 15, 1974, 2:431 note 52:30101 note 88 Stat. 1304 Pub. L. 92-225, title IV, § 408, formerly § 406, 2:431 note 52:30101 note Feb. 7, 1972, 86 Stat. 20 Pub. L. 107-155, § 1(a), Mar. 27, 2002, 116 2:431 note 52:30101 note Stat. 81 2:431 note 52:30101 note Pub. L. 96-187, Jan. 8, 1980, 93 Stat. 1339 2:431 note 52:30101 note Pub. L. 94-283, § 1, May 11, 1976, 90 Stat. 475 2:431 note 52:30101 note Pub. L. 93-443, Oct. 15, 1974, 88 Stat. 1263 2:431 note 52:30101 note Pub. L. 92-225, Feb. 7, 1972, 86 Stat. 3 Pub. L. 96-187, title III, § 303, Jan. 8, 1980, 93 2:431 note 52:30101 note Stat. 1368 Pub. L. 107-155, title III, § 310, Mar. 27, 2002, 2:431 note 52:30101 note 116 Stat. 104 Pub. L. 96-187, title III, § 302, Jan. 8, 1980, 93 2:431 note 52:30101 note Stat. 1368 Pub. L. 92-225, title III, § 302, Feb. 7, 1972, 86 2:432 52:30102 Stat. 12 V FEDERAL ELECTION CAMPAIGN LAWS United States Code Former New Provision of Law Affected Classification Classification Pub. L. 104-79, § 1(c), Dec. 28, 1995, 109 Stat. 2:432 note 52:30102 note 791 Pub. L. 104-79, § 3(d), Dec. 28, 1995, 109 Stat. 2:432 note 52:30102 note 793 Pub. L. 92-225, title III, § 303, Feb. 7, 1972, 86 2:433 52:30103 Stat. 14 Pub. L. 92-225, title III, § 304, Feb. 7, 1972, 86 2:434 52:30104 Stat. 14 Pub. L. 110-81, title II, § 204(b), Sept. 14, 2:434 note 52:30104 note 2007, 121 Stat. 746 Pub. L. 110-81, title II, § 215, Sept. 14, 2007, 2:434 note 52:30104 note 121 Stat. 751 Pub. L. 106-58, title VI, § 639(b), Sept. 29, 2:434 note 52:30104 note 1999, 113 Stat. 476 Pub. L. 106-58, title VI, § 641(b), Sept. 29, 2:434 note 52:30104 note 1999, 113 Stat. 477 Pub. L. 107-155, title II, § 201(b), Mar. 27, 2:434 note 52:30104 note 2002, 116 Stat. 90 Pub. L. 93-443, title II, § 204(e), Oct. 15, 1974, 2:434 note 52:30104 note 88 Stat. 1278 Pub. L. 92-225, title III, § 305, formerly § 307, 2:437 52:30105 Feb. 7, 1972, 86 Stat. 16 Pub. L. 92-225, title III, § 306, formerly § 310, 2:437c 52:30106 as added Pub. L. 93-443, title II, § 208(a), Oct. 15, 1974, 88 Stat. 1280 Pub. L. 105-61, title V, § 512(b), Oct. 10, 1997, 2:437c note 52:30106 note 111 Stat. 1305 Pub. L. 94-283, title I, § 101(e)-(g), May 11, 2:437c note 52:30106 note 1976, 90 Stat. 476, 477 Pub. L. 93-443, title II, § 208(b), Oct. 15, 1974, 2:437c note 52:30106 note 88 Stat. 1286 Pub. L. 92-225, title III, § 307, formerly § 311, 2:437d 52:30107 as added Pub. L. 93-443, title II, § 208(a), Oct. 15, 1974, 88 Stat. 1282 VI FEDERAL ELECTION CAMPAIGN LAWS TITLE RECLASSIFICATION TABLE United States Code Former New Provision of Law Affected Classification Classification Pub.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • California Campaign Finance and Ballot Measure Guide Contents
    State Law Resource California Campaign Finance and Ballot Measure Guide Contents Overview 1 Key Concepts 2 Activities Your Organization Can Engage in That Won’t Trigger Disclosure 8 Contribution Limits and Source Restrictions 11 Registration and Reporting Requirements 15 Reminders About IRS Rules 15 Registration Thresholds 15 Types of Recipient Committees 15 Registration and Reporting Mechanics 18 Recordkeeping Rules 20 Use of Campaign Funds 20 Communications 21 After the Election 23 Common Mistakes 24 Enforcement and Penalties 24 Alliance for Justice is a national association of over 120 organizations, representing a broad array of groups committed to progressive values and the creation of an equitable, just, and free society. Since 1979, AFJ has been the leader in advocating for a fair and independent justice system, preserving access to the courts, and empowering others to stand up and fight for their causes. The two pillars of Alliance for Justice are our Justice Program, focusing on ensuring our nation’s courts protect our critical constitutional rights and legal protections, and our Bolder Advocacy Program, focusing on building advocacy capacity among nonprofits and the foundations that fund them. bolderadvocacy.org allianceforjustice.org Page 1 State Law Resources California Campaign Finance and Ballot Measure Guide This guide summarizes the laws and regulations governing campaign finance in California. In California, “campaign finance” includes both ballot measures and candidates at both the local and state level. This guide is not intended to provide legal advice or to serve as a substitute for legal advice. For free legal and technical advice on compliance with California campaign finance rules, contact the California Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC).
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Campaign Finance Guide
    2021 Campaign Finance Guide Mississippi Secretary of State’s Office Elections Division P.O. Box 136 Jackson, MS 39205 601-576-2550 Elections Hotline: 800-829-6786 www.sos.ms.gov 1 | P a g e R e v . 01/ 2 0 21 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ABOUT THIS GUIDE ............................................................................................................................................ 4 THIS YEAR’S CAMPAIGN FINANCE REPORTING REQUIREMENTS....................................................... 5 2021 MUNICIPAL GENERAL ELECTION REPORTING SCHEDULE......................................................... 7 2021 SPECIAL ELECTIONS REPORTING SCHEDULE ................................................................................ 7 CAMPAIGN FINANCE REPORTING IN MISSISSIPPI ................................................................................... 8 I. CAMPAIGN FINANCE FOR CANDIDATES AND CANDIDATE’S COMMITTEES ............................... 8 Distribution of Campaign Materials ................................................................................................... 9 Where do I file? ..................................................................................................................................... 9 What information must be reported? ................................................................................................. 9 When are reports due? ....................................................................................................................... 10 What types of reports
    [Show full text]
  • Regulating “Fake News” and Other Online Advertising
    FOOL ME ONCE: REGULATING “FAKE NEWS” AND OTHER ONLINE ADVERTISING ABBY K. WOOD* AND ANN M. RAVEL† A lack of transparency for online political advertising has long been a problem in American political campaigns. Disinformation attacks that American voters have experienced since the 2016 campaign have made the need for regulatory action more pressing. Internet platforms prefer self-regulation and have only recently come around to supporting proposed transparency legislation. While government must not regulate the content of political speech, it can, and should, force transparency into the process. We propose several interventions aimed at transparency. First, and most importantly, campaign finance regulators should require platforms to store and make available (1) ads run on their platforms, and (2) the audience at whom the ad was targeted. Audience availability can be structured to avoid privacy concerns, and it meets an important speech value in the “marketplace of ideas” theory of the First Amendment—that of enabling counter speech. Our proposed regulations would capture any political advertising, including disinformation, that is promoted via paid distribution on social media, as well as all other online political advertising. Second, existing loopholes in transparency regulations *. Associate Professor of Law, Political Science, and Public Policy at University of Southern California ([email protected]). †. Senior Fellow, Maplight Digital Deception Project and former Chair of the Federal Election Commission and California Fair Political Practices Commission. This article has benefited from insights from Rebecca Brown, Chris Elmendorf, and Rick Hasen. Daniel Brovman, Samantha Hay, Justin Mello, Brandon Thompson, and Caroline Yoon provided fantastic research assistance. Teresa Delgado and Alex Manzanares joyfully created the time and space required to focus on the project.
    [Show full text]
  • The Other Voting Right: Protecting Every Citizen's Vote by Safeguarding the Integrity of the Ballot Box
    YALE LAW & POLICY REVIEW The Other Voting Right: Protecting Every Citizen's Vote by Safeguarding the Integrity of the Ballot Box . Kenneth Blackwell* and Kenneth A. Klukowski* INTRODUCTION There is a saying that "people get the government they vote for." The impli- cation of the maxim is that if undesirable or unwise legislation is enacted, if ex- ecutive branch officials are inept or ineffective, or if the government is beset with widespread corruption, then such unfortunate results are the consequence of the electorate's decision regarding whom to trust with the powers and pres- tige of public office. The Constitution does not forbid people from enacting wrongheaded policies. If voters elect leaders that fail them, then the citizenry is saddled with the consequences of its choice until the next election. Such is the reality in a democratic republic. But this argument begs the question of whether voters did in fact elect the individuals who take their oaths of office. How do citizens know which candi- date actually won in any given election? Election results are legitimate only to the extent that the returns include every legal vote-and only those legal votes-undiluted by fraudulent or otherwise unacceptable votes. The task of counting every legal ballot and excluding every unlawful one is the challenge faced by practitioners of election law, whether as lawyers or as election officials. Primary authority for elections in America rests with the states, and in each ju- risdiction the secretary of state is the senior executive officer responsible for en- suring a free and fair election.
    [Show full text]
  • Party Polarization and Campaign Finance
    July 2014 Party Polarization and Campaign Finance Thomas E. Mann and Anthony Corrado INTRODUCTION he intense debate these days about the shortcomings of American democ- racy and how best to deal with them often features assertions about parties, Tpolarization, and campaign finance that appear puzzling if not downright con- Thomas E. Mann tradictory. For example, some analysts argue that campaign finance reforms have is the W. Averell Harriman reduced the role of political parties in campaigns and thereby weakened the ability Chair and senior fellow in 1 Governance Studies at The of party leaders to commandeer their members on behalf of achievable policy goals. Brookings Institution. Between 1987 and 1999, he was Director This seems an odd argument to make in an era of historically high levels of party loy- of Governmental Studies at alty—on roll calls in Congress and voting in the electorate. Are parties too strong and Brookings. He is co-author, with Norman J. Ornstein, of It's Even unified or too weak and fragmented? Have they been marginalized in the financing of Worse Than It Looks: How the elections or is their role at least as strong as it has ever been? Does the party role in American Constitutional System Collided With the New Politics of campaign finance (weak or strong) materially shape our capacity to govern? Extremism. A second example involves the mix of small and large individual donors and its connection to polarization. The increasing involvement in presidential and congressional campaigns of large donors—especially through Super PACs and politically-active nonprofit organizations—has raised serious concerns about whether the super-wealthy are buying American democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Public Financing of Elections and Political Parties in India: Lessons from Global Experiences
    NOVEMBER 2017 Towards Public Financing of Elections and Political Parties in India: Lessons from Global Experiences NIRANJAN SAHOO Towards Public Financing of Elections and Political Parties in India: Lessons from Global Experiences NIRANJAN SAHOO ABOUT THE AUTHOR Niranjan Sahoo is a Senior Fellow at Observer Research Foundation, with many years of expertise on issues of governance, democracy, campaign finance reforms, insurgency, and conflict studies. He serves as a member of the Carnegie Rising Democracies Network (RDN) in Washington, D.C. ISBN : 978-93-87407-13-8 © 2017 Observer Research Foundation. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without permission in writing from ORF. Towards Public Financing of Elections and Political Parties in India: Lessons from Global Experiences ABSTRACT Democracy costs a lot of money. To fight elections and run their routine activities, political parties in India seek donations from all possible sources including “illegal” and “interested” money. This has serious ramifications in preserving the integrity of Indian democracy. An increasing number of countries, meanwhile, have taken the path of public subsidies and direct funding of parties and political activities—aiming to reduce dependence on interested money, equalise political opportunity, and bring greater transparency and accountability to democratic processes. By better targeting state subsidies, countries like Germany and the UK, for example, have made strides in reducing the role of interested money in elections and bringing visible transparency in their electoral politics. While India cannot take a leaf out of these experiences, there is a lot to learn from them.
    [Show full text]
  • The County Election Commission
    CTAS e-Li Published on e-Li (http://eli.ctas.tennessee.edu) October 01, 2021 The County Election Commission Dear Reader: The following document was created from the CTAS electronic library known as e-Li. This online library is maintained daily by CTAS staff and seeks to represent the most current information regarding issues relative to Tennessee county government. We hope this information will be useful to you; reference to it will assist you with many of the questions that will arise in your tenure with county government. However, the Tennessee Code Annotated and other relevant laws or regulations should always be consulted before any action is taken based upon the con- tents of this document. Please feel free to contact us if you have questions or comments regarding this information or any other e-Li material. Sincerely, The University of Tennessee County Technical Assistance Service 226 Capitol Blvd. Suite 400 Nashville, TN. 37219 615-532-3555 phone 615-532-3699 fax [email protected] www.ctas.tennessee.edu Page 1 of 7 Table of Contents The County Election Commission.............................................................. 3 Qualifications and Disqualifications........................................................ 3 Oath of Office and Organization............................................................. 3 Office Hours............................................................................................ 3 Meetings................................................................................................. 3 Duties-County
    [Show full text]
  • Political Reelism: a Rhetorical Criticism of Reflection and Interpretation in Political Films
    POLITICAL REELISM: A RHETORICAL CRITICISM OF REFLECTION AND INTERPRETATION IN POLITICAL FILMS Jennifer Lee Walton A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May 2006 Committee: John J. Makay, Advisor Richard Gebhardt Graduate Faculty Representative John T. Warren Alberto Gonzalez ii ABSTRACT John J. Makay, Advisor The purpose of this study is to discuss how political campaigns and politicians have been depicted in films, and how the films function rhetorically through the use of core values. By interpreting real life, political films entertain us, perhaps satirically poking fun at familiar people and events. However, the filmmakers complete this form of entertainment through the careful integration of American values or through the absence of, or attack on those values. This study provides a rhetorical criticism of movies about national politics, with a primary focus on the value judgments, political consciousness and political implications surrounding the films Mr. Smith Goes to Washington (1939), The Candidate (1972), The Contender (2000), Wag the Dog (1997), Power (1986), and Primary Colors (1998). iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank everyone who made this endeavor possible. First and foremost, I thank Doctor John J. Makay; my committee chair, for believing in me from the start, always encouraging me to do my best, and assuring me that I could do it. I could not have done it without you. I wish to thank my committee members, Doctors John Warren and Alberto Gonzalez, for all of your support and advice over the past months.
    [Show full text]
  • The Electoral Advantage to Incumbency
    1%(5:25.,1*3$3(56(5,(6 7+((/(&725$/$'9$17$*(72,1&80%(1&<$1'927(56¶9$/8$7,212) 32/,7,&,$16¶(;3(5,(1&($5(*5(66,21',6&217,18,7<$1$/<6,62) (/(&7,216727+(86+286( 'DYLG6/HH :RUNLQJ3DSHU KWWSZZZQEHURUJSDSHUVZ 1$7,21$/%85($82)(&2120,&5(6($5&+ 0DVVD2KXVHWWV$YHQXH &DPEULGJH50$ $XJXVW 0DWWKHZ %XWOHU SURYLGHG RXWVWDQGLQJ UHVHDUK DVVLVWDQH , WKDQN -RKQ 'L1DUGR IRU QXPHURXV LQYDOXDEOH GLVXVVLRQV!DQG-RVK$QJULVW!-HII.OLQJ!-DN3RUWHU!/DUU\.DW]!7HG0LJXHO!DQG(G*ODHVHUIRUGHWDLOHG RPPHQWVRQDQHDUOLHUGUDIW,DOVRWKDQNVHPLQDUSDUWLLSDQWVDW+DUYDUG!%URZQ!8,8&!8:0DGLVRQDQG %HUNHOH\IRUWKHLUDGGLWLRQDOXVHIXOVXJJHVWLRQV7KHYLHZVH[SUHVVHGKHUHLQDUHWKRVHRIWKHDXWKRUDQGQRW QHHVVDULO\WKRVHRIWKH1DWLRQDO%XUHDXRI(RQRPL5HVHDUK E\'DYLG6/HH$OOULJKWVUHVHUYHG6KRUWVHWLRQVRIWH[W!QRWWRH[HHGWZRSDUDJUDSKV!PD\EHTXRWHG ZLWKRXWH[SOLLWSHUPLVVLRQSURYLGHGWKDWIXOOUHGLW!LQOXGLQJQRWLH!LVJLYHQWRWKHVRXUH 7KH(OH2WRUDO$GYDQWDJHWR,Q2XPEHQ2\DQG9RWHUV¶9DOXDWLRQRI3ROLWL2LDQV¶([SHULHQ2H $5HJUHVVLRQ'LV2RQWLQXLW\$QDO\VLVRI(OH2WLRQVWRWKH86+RXVH 'DYLG6/HH 1%(5:RUNLQJ3DSHU1R $XJXVW -(/1R'5'5- $%675$&7 8VLQJGDWDRQHOH2WLRQVWRWKH8QLWHG6WDWHV+RXVHRI5HSUHVHQWDWLYHV>B5WKLVSDSHU H[SORLWV D TXDVLH[SHULPHQW JHQHUDWHG E\ WKH HOH2WRUDO V\VWHP LQ RUGHU WR GHWHUPLQH LI SROLWL2DO LQ2XPEHQ2\SURYLGHVDQHOH2WRUDODGYDQWDJH±DQLPSOL2LWILUVWRUGHUSUHGL2WLRQRISULQ2LSDODJHQWWKHRULHV RI SROLWL2LDQ DQG YRWHU EHKDYLRU &DQGLGDWHV ZKR MXVW EDUHO\ ZRQ DQ HOH2WLRQ >EDUHO\ EH2DPH WKH LQ2XPEHQWBDUHOLNHO\WREHH[DQWH2RPSDUDEOHLQDOORWKHUZD\VWR2DQGLGDWHVZKREDUHO\ORVW5DQGVR WKHLUGLIIHUHQWLDOHOH2WRUDORXW2RPHVLQWKHQH[WHOH2WLRQVKRXOGUHSUHVHQWDWUXHLQ2XPEHQ2\DGYDQWDJH
    [Show full text]
  • Colombia's Constitution of 1991 with Amendments Through 2015
    PDF generated: 16 Sep 2021, 17:03 constituteproject.org Colombia's Constitution of 1991 with Amendments through 2015 Subsequently amended © Oxford University Press, Inc. Translated by Max Planck Institute, with updates by the Comparative Constitutions Project Prepared for distribution on constituteproject.org with content generously provided by Oxford University Press. This document has been recompiled and reformatted using texts collected in Oxford’s Constitutions of the World and the repository of the Comparative Constitutions Project. constituteproject.org PDF generated: 16 Sep 2021, 17:03 Table of contents Preamble . 4 TITLE I: On Fundamental Principles . 4 TITLE II: On Rights, Guarantees, and Duties . 5 Chapter I: On Fundamental Rights . 5 Chapter II: On Social, Economic, and Cultural Rights . 10 Chapter III: On Collective Rights and the Environment . 20 Chapter IV: On the Protection and Application of Rights . 21 Chapter V: On Duties and Obligations . 23 TITLE III: On the Population and the Territory . 24 Chapter I: On Nationality . 24 Chapter II: On Citizenship . 25 Chapter III: On Aliens . 25 Chapter IV: On Territory . 25 TITLE IV: On Democratic Participation and Political Parties . 26 Chapter I: On the Forms of Democratic Participation . 26 Chapter II: On Political Parties and Political Movements . 27 Chapter III: On the Status of the Opposition . 30 TITLE V: On the Organization of the State . 31 Chapter I: On the Structure of the State . 31 Chapter II: On the Public Service . 32 TITLE VI: On the Legislative Branch . 35 Chapter I: On its Composition and Functions . 35 Chapter II: On its Sessions and Activities . 38 Chapter III: On Statutes .
    [Show full text]
  • Draft FY 2018-2022 Strategic Plan
    Federal Election Commission Draft FY 2018-2022 Strategic Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Federal Election Commission’s (FEC) Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years (FYs) 2018-2022 identifies the Commission’s strategic objectives and provides a road map for meeting those objectives. It also describes current challenges facing the FEC and addresses future trends that may affect the achievement of the agency’s goal. The mission of the FEC is to protect the integrity of the federal campaign finance process by providing transparency and fairly enforcing and administering federal campaign finance laws. The Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA/the Act) reflects a belief that democracy works best when voters can make informed decisions in the political process—decisions based in part on knowing the sources of financial support for federal candidates, political party committees and other political committees. As a result, the FEC’s first strategic objective is to inform the public about how federal campaigns and committees are financed. Public confidence in the political process also depends on the knowledge that participants in federal elections follow clear and well-defined rules and face consequences for non-compliance. Thus, the FEC’s second strategic objective focuses on the Commission’s efforts to promote voluntary compliance through educational outreach and to enforce campaign finance laws effectively and fairly. The third strategic objective is to interpret the FECA and related statutes, providing timely guidance to the public regarding the requirements of the law. The Commission also understands that organizational performance is driven by employee performance and that the agency cannot successfully achieve its mission without a high-performing workforce that understands expectations and delivers results.
    [Show full text]
  • Informed Strategies of Political Action in IP-Based Social Media Andrea Knaut
    Informed Strategies of Political Action in IP-Based Social Media Andrea Knaut To cite this version: Andrea Knaut. Informed Strategies of Political Action in IP-Based Social Media. 10th International Conference on Human Choice and Computers (HCC), Sep 2012, Amsterdam, Netherlands. pp.376-386, 10.1007/978-3-642-33332-3_35. hal-01525114 HAL Id: hal-01525114 https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01525114 Submitted on 19 May 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution| 4.0 International License Informed Strategies of Political Action in IP-based Social Media Andrea Knaut Informatik in Bildung und Gesellschaft, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany [email protected] Abstract. Political campaigning involves the intense usage of all possible media that the campaigners can afford to reach as many potential supporters as possible. Networked information technologies provide an endless source of applications and means of communication. When using computer technologies as a campaigning medium, it is essential to carefully assess the efforts concerning infrastructural and social requirements in consideration of the benefits gained. Therefore, the intertwined dimensions of political campaigning – content, infrastructure, community, protection of activists, planning, and archiving – are discussed as related to the involvement of IP-based media.
    [Show full text]