DOCSLIB.ORG

INUK>B.Plume Plan 08

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
INUK>B.Plume Plan 08 CANADIAN HERITAGE RIVER MANAGEMENT PLAN Government of Yukon in association with Government of Canada Mayo and District Renewable Resources Council February 1998 BONNET PLUME HERITAGE RIVER MANAGEMENT PLAN This Management Plan provides the operational framework for partnership action to achieve the goals and principles described herein. We, the undersigned, support the designation of the Bonnet Plume River as a Canadian Heritage River. Table Of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 1.1 Purpose of Canadian Heritage Rivers System ................................................................................................... 5 1.2 First Nation Land Claim Settlement Obligations ............................................................................................. 5 1.2.1 Nacho Nyak Dun First Nation ............................................................................................................................. 5 1.2.2 Tetlit Gwich’in First Nation ................................................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Bonnet Plume Heritage River Nomination ......................................................................................................... 6 1.3.1 History of the CHRS Program in the Yukon ..................................................................................................... 6 1.3.2 Bonnet Plume Planning Process ......................................................................................................................... 6 1.3.3 CHRS Management Plan Requirements ........................................................................................................... 9 1.4 Management Plan Challenge ................................................................................................................................. 18 1.4.1 Stakeholder Expectations and Competing Interests ...................................................................................... 18 1.4.2 Higher Duty of Care ............................................................................................................................................ 21 1.4.3 Watershed Focus .................................................................................................................................................. 21 1.4.4 Ecosystem Approach To Resource Management .......................................................................................... 21 2.0 HERITAGE RIVER MANAGEMENT PLAN 2.1 Management Plan Goal ............................................................................................................................................ 22 2.2 Management Area Boundary ................................................................................................................................. 22 2.3 Management Planning Principles ........................................................................................................................ 22 2.3.1 Conflicting Management Plan Perspectives .................................................................................................... 22 2.3.2 Spirit of Co-operative Management .................................................................................................................. 23 2.4 Resource Management Objectives ...................................................................................................................... 23 2.4.1 Natural Heritage .................................................................................................................................................... 23 2.4.2 Cultural Heritage ................................................................................................................................................... 24 2.4.3 Recreation and tourism ....................................................................................................................................... 24 2.5 Management Plan Issues ........................................................................................................................................ 25 2.5.1 Biodiversity ............................................................................................................................................................. 25 2.5.2 Wilderness .............................................................................................................................................................. 26 2.5.3 Physiography, Landforms & Climate ................................................................................................................. 29 2.5.4 Geology & History of Exploration ..................................................................................................................... 31 2.5.5 Vegetation .............................................................................................................................................................. 31 2.5.6 Fish & Wildlife ........................................................................................................................................................ 33 2.5.7 Rare and Endangered Species ............................................................................................................................ 35 2.5.8 Water Resources ................................................................................................................................................... 36 2.5.9 Protecting Landscape Views .............................................................................................................................. 38 2.5.10 Cultural Heritage Protection ............................................................................................................................ 38 2.5.11 Recreation & Tourism ........................................................................................................................................ 41 2.6 Economic Opportunities & Obligations .............................................................................................................. 42 2.6.1 First Nation Economic Development Measures ............................................................................................. 42 2.6.2 Wilderness Adventure Travel .............................................................................................................................. 45 2.6.3 Outfitting ................................................................................................................................................................ 45 2.6.4 Inherent Value of Wildlands ............................................................................................................................... 46 2.6.5 Mineral and Energy Resource Potential ........................................................................................................... 46 i Bonnet Plume Heritage River Management Plan ii Bonnet Plume Heritage River Management Plan 3.0 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY 3.1 Research Priorities ..................................................................................................................................................... 48 3.1.1 Baseline Research ................................................................................................................................................. 48 3.1.2 Land Use Planning & Development Assessment ........................................................................................... 48 3.1.3 Monitoring Limits of Acceptable Change ........................................................................................................ 49 3.2 Research Zone Priorities .......................................................................................................................................... 50 4.0 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 4.1 Life of the Management Plan and Plan Review .............................................................................................. 51 4.2 Implementation Work Programs .......................................................................................................................... 51 4.3 Agency Identification ................................................................................................................................................... 51 4.4 Work Programs .............................................................................................................................................................. 52 4.4.1 Work Program – Natural Heritage Resources ................................................................................................. 53 4.4.2 Work Program – Cultural Heritage Resources ................................................................................................ 54 4.4.3 Work Program – Recreation and Tourism Resources .................................................................................... 55 5.0 REFERENCES 5.1 Documents ...................................................................................................................................................................... 56 5.2 Contacts and Contributors ........................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tatshenshini River Ten Year Monitoring Report Prepared
    Tatshenshini River Ten Year Monitoring Report Prepared for: Yukon Parks Department of Environment Government of Yukon Whitehorse, Yukon Prepared by: Bruce K. Downie PRP Parks: Research & Planning Whitehorse, Yukon Purpose of the Report The Tatshenshini River was designated as a Canadian Heritage River in 2004. The Canadian Heritage River System requires regular monitoring of the natural, heritage and recreational values underpinning each designation. This report presents the results of the ten year review of the river values and key elements of the management strategies for the Yukon portion of the Tatshenshini watershed. The report also points out which characteristics and qualities of the designated river have been maintained as well as the activities and management actions that have been implemented to ensure the continued integrity of the river’s values. And, finally, the report also highlights issues that require further attention in order to maintain the heritage values of the designation. On the basis of these findings, the report assesses the designation status of the Tatshenshini River within the Canadian Heritage River System. Acknowledgements Thanks are due to the those individuals consulted through this analysis and especially to the dedicated individuals in Yukon and First Nations governments who continue to work towards the protection of the natural and cultural values and the wilderness recreational opportunities of the Tatshenshini River. Appreciation is also extended to Parks Canada and the Canadian Heritage Rivers Board Secretariat for their assistance and financial support of this review. All photos provided by: Government of Yukon ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ PRP Parks: Research & Planning - 2 - March, 2014 Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic Environmental Strategy Summary of Recent Aquatic Ecosystem Studies Northern Water Resources Studies
    Arctic Environmental Strategy Summary of Recent Aquatic Ecosystem Studies Northern Water Resources Studies Arctic Environmental Strategy Summary ofRecent Aquatic Ecosystem Studies August 1995 Northern Affairs Program Edited by J. Chouinard D. Milburn Published under the authority of the Honourable Ronald A. Irwin, P.C., M.P., Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development Ottawa, 1995 QS-8507-030-EF-Al Catalogue No. R72-244/1-1995E ISBN 0-662-23939-3 © Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada FOREWORD The Arctic Environmental Strategy (AES), announced in April 1991, is a six-year $100 million Green Plan initiative. The overall goal ofthe AES is to preserve and enhance the integrity, health, biodiversity and productivity ofour Arctic ecosystems for the benefit ofpresent and future generations. Four specific programs address some ofthe key environmental challenges: they are waste cleanup, contaminants, water management, and environment and economy integration. The programs are managed by the Northern Affairs Program ofthe Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development (DIAND); however, there is a strong emphasis on partnerships with northern stakeholders including Native organizations, other federal departments and the territorial governments. The AES Action on Water Program specifically strives to enhance the protection ofnorthern freshwaters through improved knowledge and decision-making. Water Resources managers in the Yukon and the Northwest Territories administer this Program which focuses on freshwater aquatic ecosystems. This report is the first detailed compilation ofstudies.conducted under the AES Action on Water Program. It covers work done from 1991 to 1994. Many studies have been concluded, while others are ongoing. Although data may not be available for all studies, or results are preliminary at this time, this report presents detailed background, objectives and methodology.
    [Show full text]
  • Teetł'it Gwich'in, Gwichya Gwich'in, and Ehdiitat Gwich
    TEETŁ’IT GWICH’IN, GWICHYA GWICH’IN, AND EHDIITAT GWICH’IN JOURNEYS TO OLD CROW ORAL HISTORY ABOUT TRAILS, MEETING PLACES, AND DIVERSE TRAVELS Gwich’in Social and Cultural Institute TRIP TO OLD CROW A story of travels by Mary Vittrekwa recorded as a COPE story When I was still staying with my grandmother, my uncle, Jimmy Kendi, died and my uncle, Julius Kendi, was a minister in Old Crow. I wanted to go and visit him, so I started over with my grandmother. When everyone started back down from Fish Creek, I said I was going over. Everyone told me not to go but still I said I was going. Mary Francis and her husband also went with me. They went as far as head of Stony with me and they turned around. I went alone from there. I thought I would see my grandmother, Annie, along the way but when I got there I found only an empty camp. They had gone back to McPherson. I left my grandmother there alone and I went to get my meat. I made a one-day round-trip. It was a long way back. Then I wanted to go to Little House [Zheh Gwitsal or Lapierre House] and so I went. When I got there, Jim Jackson and another woman who cooked for him were staying there. I really surprised him. He said that everyone went back to town for Easter, and asked why I wasn't going down. I told him I was going to Old Crow and he told me not to go because there was no trail all the way.
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Assessment Report
    RESOURCE ASSESSMENT REPORT September 2008 Produced by: the Peel Watershed Planning Commission About the Peel Watershed Planning Commission The Peel Watershed Planning Commission is responsible for developing and recommending a regional land use plan for the Peel watershed planning region. The Commission is composed of six public members nominated by affected governments. There is one nominee each from the Na-cho Nyak Dun and the Gwich'in Tribal Council, a joint Yukon Government/Vuntut Gwitchin nominee, a joint Yukon Government/Tr'ondëk Hwëch'in nominee and two Yukon Government nominees. Albert Genier, Chair Marvin Frost Ray Hayes Peter Kaye David Loeks Steve Taylor Office Peel Watershed Planning Commission 201 – 307 Jarvis Street Whitehorse, YT Y1A 2H3 Tel 867-667-2374 fax 867-667-4624 Email: [email protected] web: www.peel.planyukon.ca Cover Photo Geoff Bradshaw, of the Yukon Geological Survey, overlooking Margaret Lake, Peel Watershed. Photo by Brian Johnston, PWPC. Peel Watershed Planning Commission Acknowledgements The Peel Watershed Resource Assessment Report was produced with the assistance of a number contributing agencies, the communities of Mayo, Dawson, and Fort McPherson, and many other domain experts from the Yukon Government and the Government of Canada, and non-governmental agencies. To support the development of the eventual Recommended Peel Watershed Regional Land Use Plan, a large amount of land and resource-related information has to be compiled and analyzed. This included regional biophysical classification and mapping, a large amount of wildlife, fish and habitat-related analysis, development footprint mapping, and a variety of economic assessments, most notably tourism, oil and gas, and minerals.
    [Show full text]
  • The Canadian Heritage Rivers System
    The Canadian Heritage Rivers System ANNUAL REPORT 1995-1996 April 1996 To the federal, provincial and territorial Ministers responsible for the Canadian Heritage Rivers System I present herewith on behalf of the members of the Canadian Heritage Rivers Board, the twelfth Annual Report on the Canadian Heritage Rivers System for the fiscal year 1995-96. Respectfully submitted Barry N. Diamond Chairperson Canadian Heritage Rivers Board, 1995-1996 / I'm-: CANADIAN HI RIIACII RIVI R-. SYMKM © Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada, 1996 Published under the authority of the Minister of the Department of Canadian Heritage on behalf of the provincial and territorial Ministers responsible for parks and tourism. Ottawa, 1996 Editing: Shirley Anne Off Design & Production: Design 2000 Communications Illustrations: Patrick Mathieu (Design 2000 Communications) Photo Credits: CHRS Files: p. 3 (top & bottom) pp. 10, 11. 18, 26 P. Juurand: p. 13 Parks Canada: p. 3 (centre) pp. 14, 15, 17 St. Croix International Waterway Commission: p. 19 Virginia Petch: p. 21 Grand River Conservation Authority: p. 22 Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Canadian Heritage Rivers Board Annual Report, the Canadian Heritage Rivers System Annual Began with the 1984/85 issue, Descript. based on 1995-1996 Text in English and French with French text on inverted pages. Title on added t.d.: Rapport annuel, le réseau de rivières du patrimoine canadien. ISSN: 1201-0871 Cat. no. R62-122 1. Canadian Heritage Rivers System - Periodicals. 2. Rivers - Canada - Periodicals. 3. Stream conservation - Canada - Periodicals. 4. Conservation of natural resources - Canada - Periodicals. I. Title ISBN 0-662-62576-5 Cat.no.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Status Report Northern Mountain Caribou
    Species Status Report Northern Mountain Caribou (Woodland Caribou [Northern Mountain Population]) Rangifer tarandus caribou Vadziah (Teetl’it Gwich’in/Gwichya Gwich’in) Shúhta Ɂepe ̨́/Goɂepe ̨́(Shúhtaot’ı̨ne) Shı̨́hta go ɂǝdǝ̨́ (K’ashógot’ı̨ne) Bedzih (Shúhta Dene) Kudzih (Kaska Dene) Mbedzih (Dene Zhatie/Yati) IN THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES ASSESSMENT – SPECIAL CONCERN APRIL 2020 Species at Risk Committee status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of species suspected of being at risk in the Northwest Territories (NWT). Suggested citation: Species at Risk Committee. 2020. Species Status Report for Northern Mountain Caribou (Woodland Caribou [Northern Mountain Population]) (Rangifer tarandus caribou) in the Northwest Territories. Species at Risk Committee, Yellowknife, NT. © Government of the Northwest Territories on behalf of the Species at Risk Committee ISBN: 978-0-7708-0272-1/0-7708-0272-9 Production note: The drafts of this report were prepared by Janet Winbourne and Kristi Benson (traditional and community knowledge component) and Deborah Cichowski (scientific knowledge component), under contract with the Government of the Northwest Territories, and edited by Claire Singer, Species at Risk Implementation Supervisor, Species at Risk Secretariat. For additional copies contact: Species at Risk Secretariat c/o SC6, Department of Environment and Natural Resources P.O. Box 1320 Yellowknife, NT X1A 2L9 Tel.: (855) 783-4301 (toll free) Fax.: (867) 873-0293 E-mail: [email protected] www.nwtspeciesatrisk.ca ABOUT THE SPECIES AT RISK COMMITTEE The Species at Risk Committee was established under the Species at Risk (NWT) Act. It is an independent committee of experts responsible for assessing the biological status of species at risk in the NWT.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2006 Ii
    Spring 2014 Vol. 41 No. 1 Quarterly Journal of the Wilderness Canoe Association Above Kazan Falls (from L to R: George Luste, Mike Good, John Martin, John Blackborow) Reindeer Lake to Baker Lake 1974 Following the 1894 route of Joseph Burr Tyrrell Story by John Martin Photos by John Martin and George Luste In January 1974, George Luste walked into my office and and tame rivers in southern Ontario, so this opportunity was proposed a canoe trip of over 800 miles, from Reindeer Lake immediately intriguing and I soon agreed. I had only been at on the Saskatchewan/Manitoba border to Baker Lake in the the University of Toronto for a year and it amazes me now Barren Lands during the upcoming summer. While I had that I got away with an eight-week absence from the lab so been paddling a canoe all my life, it had all been on lakes early in my career! The idea was to follow a large part of the 1894 route of Joseph Burr Tyrrell, which, as far as we knew, had not been done by anyone since. As many readers will know, Tyrrell was an acclaimed larger-than-life Canadian who travelled vast regions of the prairies and Barrens as an explorer and geologist for the Canadian Geographic Survey in the 1880s and 90s. In 1893, after descend - ing the Dubawnt to Baker Lake, his party paddled in appalling conditions in October down the coast of Hudson Bay and nearly perished not far north of Churchill. During this trip he had heard from his aboriginal guides of another great northern river, now known as the Kazan, and, undaunted, began to organ - ize an expedition to find and explore it.
    [Show full text]
  • Peel Watershed, Yukon. International Significance from the Perspective Of
    aseoi (xJ^dE PEEL WATERSHED, YUKON International Significance from the perspective of Parks, Recreation and Conservation Report prepared for: Yukon Parks Department of Environment, Government of Yukon, Whitehorse Report prepared by: Michael J.B. Green, Stepfien iWcCool and James Thorsell in collaboration with UNEP-WCMC Igor Lysenko and Charles Besangon March 2008 Notice: The following report has been prepared under contract to Yukon Parks by an independent consulting team. As such, it represents the analysis and views of the consultants only and is not a statement of Yukon Government policy or position. Yukon Parks April 4, 2008 FOREWORD This study was commissioned by the Yukon Parks Branch of the Department of Environment, Government of Yukon. Its purpose is to assess the significance of the Peel Watershed, a wilderness region within the central Yukon that is currently undergoing a regional planning process to determine the appropnate balance of uses for the future, Including conservation, traditional use, economic development and resource extraction. This report provides an international perspective to the significance of the Peel Watershed within the Arctic, focusing on the extent and quality of this wilderness particularly with respect to its biodiversity and recreational values. In addition to being examined at Arctic and continental (North America) scales, the Peel Watershed is also considered in more detail as a river basin level. Readers with little time at their disposal are encouraged to first look at the Conclusions and Recommendations in the final chapter (5) of this report, in conjunction with the 16 Maps that present much of the technical data in spatial form.
    [Show full text]
  • STRATEGIC PLAN 2020-2030 Importance of Canada’S River Heritage
    Canadian Heritage Rivers System 2020-2030 Strategic Plan South Nahanni River, NT Table of Contents Foreword From the Canadian Heritage Rivers Board .......................................2 Importance of Canada’s River Heritage ..............................................................3 Benefits of Belonging to the System ....................................................................4 Case Study: Benefits of Canadian Heritage River Designation on the Cowichan (Quw’utsun) River, British Columbia ............................................5 Program Structure .....................................................................................................6 Vision and Principles ................................................................................................7 New Directions for the Canadian Heritage Rivers System ..............................8 Strategic Framework ................................................................................................. 9 Priority 1: Advancing Reconciliation on Canadian Heritage Rivers ....................9 Priority 2: Strengthening the Canadian Heritage Rivers Network .......................10 Priority 3: Excellence in River Management and Conservation ...........................11 Priority 4: Engaging Canadians in Celebrating and Stewarding Heritage Rivers...........................................................................................12 Implementation of the Strategic Plan ..................................................................13 Tables and figures
    [Show full text]
  • Icings and Groundwater Conditions in Permafrost Catchments of Northwestern Canada Hugo Crites1, Steve V
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Icings and groundwater conditions in permafrost catchments of northwestern Canada Hugo Crites1, Steve V. Kokelj2 & Denis Lacelle1* Icings are sheet-like masses of ice that form on the ground surface or in fuvial channels from groundwater seepage. Although the presence of icings in the landscape is known, few studies investigated their regional distribution and explored relations with terrain factors including permafrost and winter basefow conditions. Here, we mapped the distribution of icings in a 618,430 km2 area of northwestern Canada from a stack of 573 Landsat imageries (1985–2017) and determined using hydrometric data the winter basefow contribution to the total annual discharge of 17 rivers in the study area. The 1402 mapped icings occur preferentially at the foothills of heavily faulted karstic mountainous regions in the continuous permafrost. Winter basefow and its contribution to annual discharge was lower in continuous permafrost catchments than in discontinuous permafrost but showed a general increase over the 1970–2016 period. As such, the distribution of icings appears to be sensitive to winter air temperatures and winter basefow conditions and icings located at the southern boundary of continuous permafrost would be more sensitive to degrading permafrost and the predicted increase in winter basefow. Permafrost and hydrology are coupled components in many Arctic systems1–4. In northwestern Canada and Alaska, warming climate has caused an increase in active layer thicknesses and permafrost temperatures5–7, which have afected hydrological processes. For example, the recent reduction in the area of ponds and lakes in discontinuous permafrost has been associated with an increase in sub-subsurface drainage and connectivity8,9.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 1995 Vol
    Summer 1995 Vol. 22 No.2 Quarterly Journal of the Wilderness Canoe Association Falls on Snare River NORTH OF GREAT SLAVE LAKE Part 2: Coming back Herb Pohl (Part 1 was presented in the Spring '95 issue.) . interconnected ponds. This looked much better than I had dared to hope. The esker, rather than one continuous ribbon, I had spent a great deal of time looking at maps before was a series of anastomosing heaps of gravel and well- deciding on an overland route which would take me from the rounded rocks which separated the water into discrete enti- Acasta River to the Winter River headwaters at Whitewolf ties. Spruce trees, hundreds of years old and much larger than Lake. The plan was to leave the Acasta at a point where a anything I had encountered heretofore, dominated the high poorly defined esker, running east-west, is bisected by the ground. I had actually planned to camp here and do a bit of river. Now, with mounting excitement, I was nearing the area reconnoitring, but a nervous restlessness and the ceaseless and worried whether I would recognize the place. complaints of a sandpiper urged me on. Several short por- Right on cue the river widened, revealing mounds of tages brought me to the last pond which drains into the sand and boulders beyond a little bay on the eastern shore Acasta River. By now it was too late to proceed and I and a narrow, shallow opening which led to a series of reluctantly made camp on the south shore. Just behind the Nastawgan Summer 1995 tent a dark wall of rock loomed threateningly and all around there was an air of desolation.
    [Show full text]
  • Perestroika Comes to Paddling
    Summer 1990 Vol. 17 No.2 Quarterly Journal of the Wilderness Canoe Association PERESTROIKA COMES TO PADDLING John W. Lentz The fisherman's words drifted out from shore. "Hey, Slava, toward the "other side." By early 1987 I didn't expect much who are you paddling with?" more from my latest efforts, though support from the Na- "Americans," our Russian friend replied. tional Geographic Society and our retiring Maryland Sena- "You gotta be crazy! We don't let Americans in here," tor, Charles "Mac" Mathias, was not harming the cause. came the astonished retort. An overcast March morning at my Washington desk was That night, within the soft glow of a Siberian hearth fast forgotten when I took the call from a friend at the U.S. somewhere near the upper Katun River, I'm sure our bank- Information Agency announcing arrival of a cable from our side observer had a wild story to tell: Americans paddling Moscow Embassy. Its key words: "Sovintersport (an arm of our turbulent Katun ... no less in Soviet catamarans ... all the U.S.S.R. State Committee on Sports and Physical Cul- this glasnost-perestroika talk from Moscow really is chang- ture) offers a trip on the Katun River ... an exception ing things .... made." Great day-sun was out! Those months before our You've got it, Mr. Siberia. In the 20 years before our mid-July departure shot by on fast forward: recruiting a breakthrough I had tried to gain entry time after time. At competent, multi-faceted crew; meetings to sort out a yellow every rebuff I consoled 'myself with another canoe trip in pad full of "must-does"; and local tune-up trips.
    [Show full text]