Galaxy Cluster Merging and Vacuum Absorption by Black Holes As a Support for Quantum Dipole Repeller Gravity and a Contracting Universe
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Galaxy Cluster Merging and Vacuum Absorption by Black Holes As a Support for a Contracting Universe
Galaxy Cluster Merging and Vacuum Absorption by black holes as a Support for a Contracting Universe. Leo Vuyk, Architect, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Abstract, According to Quantum Function Follows Form Theory, the big bang was the evaporation and splitting of a former Big Crunch black hole nucleus of compressed Axion Higgs particles into the oscillating Axion /Higgs field vacuum lattice respectively chunky nuclei of dark matter black holes. At the same time this explosion should remain symmetric by entanglement and not only produce material universes but also anti material universe bubbles in the form of a raspberry, the multiverse. As a consequence, of a cyclic multiverse we should be able to find signs of a contracting process inside our own universe. One of that signs is the well known merging of galaxies into clusters and Galaxy cluster merging into galaxy super clusters. However it is still not observed that the vacuum space between the galaxy super clusters is also contracting. The Hubble redshift we observe, is the main objection for such a contracting vacuum system which is adopted by the physics community as a sign for the expansion of the universe. The Hubble redshift is not a definite signal for expansion if we adopt that the redshift is also subjected to a process of vacuum absorption by proliferated chunks of “new physics” electric dark matter black holes. Recently I found that the merging of galaxy clusters itself show dynamic observational signs of a contraction of the vacuum inside the merging galaxy clusters by the anomalous central clustering of the dark matter black hole content which seems to be stripped from the individual galaxy clusters located at the borders of the new super cluster. -
Large Scale Properties of the Universe
Large scale structure of the Universe (1 pc < l < 3000 Mpc from us, non-technical introduction) Dmitry Podolsky Helsinki Institute of Physics 1. Observable Universe: where are we, what we see 1.1. In visible light 1.2. In the IR 1.3. In radiowaves 1.4. In x-rays 1.5. In microwaves 2. Matter content; history of the Universe 2.1. Expansion of the Universe; FRW cosmology 2.2. Matter content in the Universe 2.3. Dark matter 2.4. Dark energy 2.5. Acoustic peaks in the CMB spectrum; cosmological parameters 2.6. A brief history of the Universe Dubna, 23 Jul 2007 1. OBSERVABLE UNIVERSE Small Magellanic Cloud (200000 ly away from us) and the star cluster NGC 602 (5 million years old, in our galaxy). 1 light year is the distance passed by a ray of light during 1 year, 13 about 10 km HST In visible light 1. Stars. Main source of visible light in the Universe is nuclear fusion within stars (mainly, H → He). 30 Our Sun is a typical yellow dwarf star with the mass about 2 x 10 kg. It is 100 times more massive then all planets of Solar system combined. There are stars in our galaxy with mass about 100 times larger than the mass of the Sun. As you know, closest stars are a few ly away from us (Proxima Centaurus – 3.261 ly = 1 parsec away) Young stars (blue) near the center of Centaurus A (one of the strongest sources of radio emmision on the sky) HST 2. -
Three Paths to Particle Dark Matter
Three Paths to Particle Dark Matter Thesis by Samuel K. Lee In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California 2012 (Defended April 16, 2012) ii c 2012 Samuel K. Lee All Rights Reserved iii Some realize the Supreme by meditating, by its aid, on the Self within, others by pure reason, others by right action. Others again, having no direct knowledge but only hearing from others, nevertheless worship, and they, too, if true to the teachings, cross the sea of death. | The Bhagavad Gita (13.25{26) Forgotten rimes, and college themes, Worm-eaten plans, and embryo schemes;{ A mass of heterogeneous matter, A chaos dark, nor land nor water... | An Inventory of the Furniture in Dr. Priestley's Study (37{40), Anna Lætitia Barbauld (1825) iv Acknowledgments Astronomy now demands bodily abstraction of its devotee. To see into the beyond requires purity. and the securing it makes him perforce a hermit from his kind. | Mars and Its Canals, Percival Lowell (1906) I first encountered the above words on my recent cross-country emigration from Caltech to Johns Hopkins; they were engraved as an epitaph on Lowell's mausoleum, which is located on the grounds of the observatory bearing the learn'd astronomer's name. Upon reading them, I felt grateful that I could count myself luckier than Lowell in two respects: first, that we can be reasonably sure that dark matter will not follow the canals of Mars into the forgotten annals of science, and, more importantly, that my experience as a scientist thus far was neither as lonely nor as forsaken as Lowell's profound yet depressing words suggest it should have been. -
Cover Page the Handle
Cover Page The handle http://hdl.handle.net/1887/3188671 holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation. Author: Di Gennaro, G. Title: Merging galaxy clusters: probing magnetism and particle acceleration over cosmic time Issue date: 2021-07-08 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1. Galaxy clusters Galaxy clusters are the largest virialized structures in the Universe. They can contain more than a thousand galaxies within a radius of 1 2 ⇠ − Mpc. However, galaxies only represent a small percentage of the cluster’s 14 15 mass, which is about 10 − M . The bulk of the cluster mass is in the form of dark matter (70–80%), although its nature is still unknown. The remaining mass of a cluster, the baryonic content, is dominated by a dilute and hot plasma. This intracluster medium (ICM) fills the space in between the cluster member galaxies. According to the current Cosmology (⇤CDM1, where ⇤ refers to the cos- mological constant and CDM stays for Cold Dark Matter), structure for- mation is thought to be a consequence of a hierarchical growth of small density fluctuations under the effect of gravity (e.g. Peebles, 1980; Coles & Chiang, 2000). Such variations could be produced by cosmic inflation, and are detected as temperature anisotropies in the cosmic microwave back- ground (CMB), which maps the surface of last scattering between matter and radiation. In this framework, galaxy clusters are the latest structures to form, at the intersections of filaments in the cosmic web. The gravitational collapse of the small fluctuations is usually studied via hydrodynamical cosmological simulations (e.g. Illustris, Fig.