DOCSLIB.ORG

A Comparative Study of Teacher Preparation and Qualifications in Six Nations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Comparative Study of Teacher Preparation and Qualifications in Six Nations A Comparative Study of Teacher Preparation and Qualifications in Six Nations Edited by Richard M. Ingersoll ABOUT CPRE The Consortium for Policy Research in Education (CPRE) unites seven of the nation’s top research institutions in an exciting venture to improve student learning through research on policy, finance, school reform, and school governance. The members of CPRE are the University of Pennsylvania, Teachers College Columbia University, Harvard University, Stanford University, the University of Michigan, the University of Wisconsin-Madison, and Northwestern University. CPRE is currently examining how alternative approaches to reform— such as new accountability policies, teacher compensation, whole-school reform approaches, and efforts to contract out instructional services— address issues of coherence, incen- tives, and capacity. To learn more about CPRE, visit our web site at www.cpre.org or call (215) 573-0700, and then press 0 for assistance. CPRE Research Report Series Research Reports are issued by CPRE to facilitate the exchange of ideas among policymakers, practi- tioners, and researchers who share an interest in education policy. The views expressed in the reports are those of individual authors, and not necessarily shared by CPRE or its institutional partners. A Comparative Study of Teacher Preparation and Qualifications in Six Nations By Richard M. Ingersoll, United States With Ding Gang and Sun Meilu, People’s Republic of China (PRC) Kwok Chan Lai, Hong Kong Hidenori Fujita, Japan Ee-gyeong Kim, Republic of Korea Steven K. S. Tan and Angela F. L. Wong, Singapore Pruet Siribanpitak and Siriporn Boonyananta, Thailand CPRE Consortium for Policy Research in Education University of Pennsylvania / Teachers College - Columbia University Harvard University / Stanford University University of Michigan / University of Wisconsin-Madison Northwestern University Table of Contents Table of Contents ..............................................................................................................................................................i List of Tables......................................................................................................................................................................iv List of Figures ....................................................................................................................................................................v About the Authors..............................................................................................................................................................vi Acknowledgments ..............................................................................................................................................................vii Chapter 1. A Comparative Study of Teacher Preparation and Qualifications in Six Nations ......................................1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................................1 The Research Project..........................................................................................................................................................4 1.) What are the Preparation Requirements and Standards to Become a Teacher? ............................................................5 2.) What are the Levels of Qualifications of the Current Teaching Force? ..........................................................................6 3.) What Proportions of Teachers are Not Qualified in the Subjects They Teach? ............................................................6 Data and Methods..............................................................................................................................................................6 Teacher Preparation Requirements and Standards ..............................................................................................................7 Governance ................................................................................................................................................................7 Education Requirements ............................................................................................................................................8 Professional Training Requirements ............................................................................................................................9 Selectivity of Programs, Caliber of Candidates and Attractiveness of Careers ..............................................................9 The Qualifications of the Teaching Force ..........................................................................................................................11 Teaching Assignments and Out-of-Field Teaching..............................................................................................................12 Overview ....................................................................................................................................................................12 Reasons for Out-of-Field Teaching..............................................................................................................................13 Implications ......................................................................................................................................................................14 References ..........................................................................................................................................................................17 Chapter 2. The Qualifications of the Teaching Force in China..................................................................................19 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................................19 Teacher Preparation Requirements and Standards ............................................................................................................21 Data and Measures ............................................................................................................................................................22 The Qualifications of the Teaching Force ..........................................................................................................................22 Out-of-Field Teaching........................................................................................................................................................25 Implications and Conclusions ............................................................................................................................................25 References ..........................................................................................................................................................................27 Chapter 3. The Qualifications of the Teaching Force in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China ....................................................................................................................................29 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................................29 The Education System ................................................................................................................................................29 The Teacher Education System....................................................................................................................................30 The Changing Policy Context ....................................................................................................................................30 Teacher Preparation Requirements and Standards ..............................................................................................................31 Professional Training Requirements ............................................................................................................................31 Academic Qualifications Requirements ......................................................................................................................32 Data and Measures ............................................................................................................................................................33 The Qualifications of the Teaching Force ..........................................................................................................................34 Out-of-Field Teaching........................................................................................................................................................35 Retreat on Professional Training ........................................................................................................................................37 One Quest for High Quality..............................................................................................................................................38 References ..........................................................................................................................................................................40 Chapter 4. The Qualifications of the Teaching Force in Japan ....................................................................................................41
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Discretion and Disproportionality: Explaining the Underrepresentation of High-Achieving Students of Color in Gifted Programs
    EROXXX10.1177/2332858415622175Grissom and ReddingDiscretion and Disproportionality 622175research-article2016 AERA Open January-March 2016, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 1 –25 DOI: 10.1177/2332858415622175 © The Author(s) 2016. http://ero.sagepub.com Discretion and Disproportionality: Explaining the Underrepresentation of High-Achieving Students of Color in Gifted Programs Jason A. Grissom Christopher Redding Vanderbilt University Students of color are underrepresented in gifted programs relative to White students, but the reasons for this underrepresen- tation are poorly understood. We investigate the predictors of gifted assignment using nationally representative, longitudinal data on elementary students. We document that even among students with high standardized test scores, Black students are less likely to be assigned to gifted services in both math and reading, a pattern that persists when controlling for other back- ground factors, such as health and socioeconomic status, and characteristics of classrooms and schools. We then investigate the role of teacher discretion, leveraging research from political science suggesting that clients of government services from traditionally underrepresented groups benefit from diversity in the providers of those services, including teachers. Even after conditioning on test scores and other factors, Black students indeed are referred to gifted programs, particularly in reading, at significantly lower rates when taught by non-Black teachers, a concerning result given the relatively low incidence of assignment to own-race teachers among Black students. Keywords: gifted education, equity, teachers, race, school context SUBSTANTIAL race disparities exist in student receipt of gifted lower achievement among Black and Hispanic students, for education services in American schools. Data from the Office example, might contribute to underrepresentation in gifted for Civil Rights (OCR) at the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletins110328 Housse.Pdf
    March 2011 No. 13 CLB requires public school teachers of core academic subjects to meet the NCLB definition of “highly qualified”. This bulletin provides information on the use of HOUSSE requirements N interpreted by the New York State Education Department (SED) to enable a teacher to achieve “highly qualified” status. Most teachers will be deemed “highly qualified,” as a result of the NYS teacher certification requirements. Some Contents teachers however will need to meet alternative criteria for demonstrating subject matter competency by completing the Overview .................................................................... 1 “High Objective Uniform State Standard of Evaluation” Defining “Highly Qualified” .................................... 2 (HOUSSE) form. Teachers who need the HOUSSE to Using The HOUSSE .................................................. 2 establish “highly qualified” status should complete the Advice to Local Leaders ........................................... 2 form as soon as possible and retain a copy. SED has Updated 2010 SED links related to HOUSSE: ....... 4 indicated that once a teacher is “highly qualified” the teacher NCLB NYSED Field Memo #03-2008: remains highly qualified in his/her current core academic Updated Fact Sheet .............................................. 5 subject teaching assignment regardless of subsequent NCLB NYSED Field Memo #04-2008: Supplement For BEDS form ...................................................51 changes to the HOUSSE requirement. Fact Sheet for Career and Technica
    [Show full text]
  • Graduate and Doctorate Programs
    GRADUATE AND DOCTORATE PROGRAMS WELCOME TO FLORIDA SOUTHERN COLLEGE As the Director of Adult and Graduate Admission, I would like to thank you for your interest in Florida Southern College’s prestigious graduate programs. Whether you’re looking for a promotion or a career change, you’ve taken an important step in your path to success. Our graduate programs prepare you with the executive-level knowledge, skills, and credentials most sought after in today’s global economy. Expert faculty, an engaged learning approach to education, and conveniently scheduled classes make us the ideal choice for professionals looking to get ahead. Once you’ve explored the enclosed material, please reach out to your Admission Counselor to find out more about what Florida Southern can do for your future. We look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, Kristen Pinner W HY F LORIDA S OUTHERN ? 1 of the nation’s top colleges for the sixth year in a row. - The Princeton Review Best Regional#4 College in the South - US News and World Report Most Beautiful#8 Campus - The Princeton Review Top 5% The Barnett Business School is among the top of business schools in the world with AACSB ranking. O UR P ROGRAM S Master of Science in Nursing (MSN) The demand for nurses with advanced education is on the rise. Florida Southern’s Master of Science in Nursing is a quick route to upward mobility and greater earning power. A Master of Science in Nursing will not only prepare you for a variety of leadership roles, but also enable you to command a generous salary.
    [Show full text]
  • The Definition for Identifying Highly Qualified Teachers
    STATE OF MICHIGAN STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION THE MICHIGAN DEFINITION FOR IDENTIFYING HIGHLY QUALIFIED TEACHERS In Accordance With Criteria Provided By The No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act Of 2001 MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Thomas D. Watkins, Jr. Superintendent of Public Instruction Approved April 24, 2003 MICHIGAN’S TEACHER CERTIFICATION SYSTEM Introduction Michigan law requires that a person employed in an elementary or secondary school with instructional responsibilities shall hold a certificate, permit, or vocational authorization valid for the position to which he/she is assigned. Within the Michigan Department of Education (MDE), the Office of Professional Preparation Services (OPPS) is the organizational unit to which compliance with this requirement is assigned. This office fosters the educational achievement of all Michigan youth and adults by assuring that all professional school personnel complete quality preparation and professional development programs that meet standards established by the Michigan Legislature, the State Board of Education, and the Superintendent of Public Instruction. The MDE and the OPPS are committed to assuring that all Michigan educators meet the requirements of being highly qualified under the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001. Background Information In Michigan, as in most states, the usual or traditional process by which one obtains a license to teach is through completion of a college or university teacher education program approved by the Michigan Department of Education (MDE). MCL §380.1531 of Act 451 of PA 1976 authorized the State Board of Education (SBE) to determine the requirements for, and issue all, licenses and certificates for teachers in public schools. MCL §388.553 – Section 3 of Act 302 of PA 1921 asserts that no one shall teach in any private, denominational or parochial school who does not hold a certificate which would qualify him or her to teach in like grades of the public schools of the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Teacher Certification Procedures
    CCEERRTTIIFFIICCAATTIIOONN GGUUIIDDEE FFOORR SSCCHHOOOOLL SSTTAAFFFF AASSSSIIGGNNMMEENNTTSS JJULY 22001100 Revisions from July 2009 to July 2010 are highlighted Updated for Highly Qualified Teacher Assignments Professional Services Division Professional Standards Section The Certification Guide for School Staff Assignments is a document to assist employers in matching the certification or qualifications appropriate for specific staff assignments. In addition, the No Child Left Behind requirements for highly qualified teachers are indicated with a check mark. This guide is available on the State Department of Education Web site at <http://www.sde.state.ok.us>. ~ ~ ~ It is the policy of the Oklahoma State Department of Education (OSDE) not to discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, gender, national origin, age, or disability in its programs or employment practices as required by Title VI and VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. Civil rights compliance inquiries related to the OSDE may be directed to the Affirmative Action Officer, Room 111, 2500 North Lincoln Boulevard, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73105-4599, telephone number (405) 522-4930; or, the United States Department of Education’s Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights. Inquiries or concerns regarding compliance with Title IX by local school districts should be presented to the local school district Title IX coordinator. July 2010 Revisions from July 2009 to July 2010 are highlighted CERTIFICATE AREAS General Information In compliance with law and after receiving extensive input from educators and representative organizations, in 1997 the State Board of Education adopted licensure and certification competencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Mississippi Educator Licensure K-12
    Title 7: Education Part 4: Guidelines for Mississippi Educator Licensure K-12 GUIDELINES FOR MISSISSIPPI EDUCATOR LICENSURE K-12 MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION DIVISION OF EDUCATOR LICENSURE 359 NORTH WEST STREET JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39201 CAREY M. WRIGHT, ED.D. STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION July 2020 INTRODUCTION The Commission on Teacher and Administrator Education, Certification and Licensure and Development was created under the Mississippi Education Reform Act of 1982 and is charged with the responsibility of making recommendations to the State Board of Education regarding standards for the preparation, licensure, and continuing professional development of those who teach or perform tasks of an educational nature in the public schools of the State of Mississippi. In compliance with Miss. Code Ann. §37-3-2, as amended by Mississippi Laws 1997, Ch. 545, the Commission on Teacher and Administrator Education, Certification and Licensure and Development and the State Board of Education have approved guidelines for licensure. This manual contains information necessary to understand the licensure processes, class levels of licensure, and pathways to licensure. Proper use of this manual should provide answers to most, if not all, general and specific questions related to educator licensure in the State of Mississippi. The Division of Educator Licensure is the sole program office within the Mississippi Department of Education to issue licenses and to implement Mississippi’s laws and policies adopted by the Mississippi State Board of Education relating to the licensing of teachers, instructional support personnel, and administrators for preschool through Grade 12 (P-12). Policies, rules, standards, directives, and memoranda written prior to this version are invalid and shall not be used to determine the application of these guidelines unless otherwise noted herein.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Childhood Generalist Standards
    Early Childhood Generalist Standards Third Edition for teachers of students ages 3–8 For additional information go to www.boardcertifiedteachers.org ©2012 (Preface revised and reformatted in 2015, 2016) National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. All rights reserved. NBPTS, NBCT, National Board for Professional Teaching Standards, National Board Certified Teacher, National Board Certification, Take One!, Accomplished Teacher and 1-800-22TEACH are registered trademarks or service marks of the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. Other marks are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective organizations. The contents of this publication were developed in whole or in part under a grant from the U.S. Department of Education. However, those contents do not necessarily represent the policy of the Department of Education, and you should not assume an endorsement by the federal government. ISBN 978-1-878520-48-7 Table of Contents Preface .................................................................................................................................................. 4 About the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards ���������������������������������������������������� 4 About the Standards ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 6 About Certification ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 7 Foundation of National Board Certification
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Certification: a Solution Or an Alternative Problem?
    Journal of Agricultural Education, 59(2), 109-122 https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2018.02109 Alternative Certification: A Solution or an Alternative Problem? Amanda M. Bowling1 & Anna L. Ball2 Abstract Teacher education is facing a number of challenges such as policy changes, funding issues, and teacher recruitment and retention. These challenges, whether on the national, state, district or school level, contribute to continued teacher shortages. Many school districts are faced with the conundrum of hiring under qualified individuals, leaving vacant positions open, or eliminating positions altogether. Thus, within all subject areas of education, a strong philosophical perspective needs to be developed to answer the question: Is alternative certification a solution to these problems or an alternative problem? This philosophical manuscript investigates the research related to alternative certification within education as a whole, career and technical education, and agricultural education. Research in education broadly indicates a lack of consistency within the current alternative certification pathways and a lack of consistent/positive influence on student outcomes within alternatively certified teachers. It is recommended that future research should investigate the impacts of various certification pathways on students. Furthermore, teacher certification pathways should be based upon solid evidence from research regarding what generates the best learning outcomes for students. Key Words: alternative certification; teacher certification pathways; alternative certification pathways; teacher preparation; teacher shortages Introduction The need for qualified teachers to fill vacancies is an issue facing all areas of education (Donitsa-Schmidt & Zuzovsky, 2014; Flynt & Morton, 2009; National Research Council, 2010). Teacher shortages could be caused by factors at either the macro or micro level (Donitsa-Schmidt & Zuzovsky, 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Mollie Rubin Vanderbilt University ∙ Peabody College 230 Appleton Place, PMB 414 Nashville, TN 37203-5721 USA Mollie.Rubin@Van
    Mollie Rubin Vanderbilt University ∙ Peabody College 230 Appleton Place, PMB 414 Nashville, TN 37203-5721 USA [email protected] ∙ 615.343.3734 ACADEMIC POSITIONS August 2017-Present Research Assistant Professor, Vanderbilt University, Peabody College, Department of Leadership, Policy, and Organizations October 2018-Present Faculty Affiliate, Tennessee Education Research Alliance (TERA) August 2015-August 2017 Assistant Director, National Center on Scaling Up Effective Schools July 2014-August 2017 Research Associate, Vanderbilt University, Peabody College, Department of Leadership, Policy, and Organizations August 2012-July 2014 Post-Doctoral Research Fellow, Vanderbilt University, Peabody College, Peabody Research Institute AREAS OF SPECIALIZATION Sociology of education, education policy, school reform and program implementation, teacher quality and evaluation, education leadership, urban education, social stratification and inequality; race, ethnicity, and immigration EDUCATION 2012 Ph.D., Sociology, University of Pennsylvania Dissertation: Perspectives on Veterans’ Health and Care 2007 M.A., Sociology, University of Pennsylvania Thesis: Making Size Matter: Teachers’ Experiences Implementing the Small Schools Model in a New York City Public High School 2001-2003 Brooklyn College, The City University of New York, Secondary Social Studies Education, New York City Teaching Fellow 2001 B.A., Sociology, University of Pennsylvania, Magna Cum Laude, Phi Beta Kappa 1997-1998 Community College of Philadelphia, Honors Humanities Program September, 2019 Page 1 of 7 Mollie Rubin, Ph.D. AWARDS AND FELLOWSHIPS 2010-2011 Dissertation Fellowship, Department of Sociology 2010 Graduate Fellowship for Teaching Excellence, Center for Teaching and Learning, University of Pennsylvania (Declined) 2008, 2010 Pew Presidential Summer Fellowship, Department of Sociology, University of Pennsylvania 2006 Otto and Gertrude K. Pollak Summer Research Fellowship 2004-2009 William Penn Fellowship, University of Pennsylvania 2001-2004 New York City Teaching Fellow 2001 Ronald J.
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Sheet – Master of Education
    Master of Education School of Education Program Overview The hallmark of students who complete a program of studies in the School of Education Admission Requirements at Holy Family University is a love of learning, a passion that manifests itself in two Applicants must submit the following ways. The first is a drive for both personal and professional growth, resulting in a master for admission to the Master of of content to be taught and the pedagogical skills needed to create effective classrooms. Education or certification program: The second is an affirmation of the dignity of each human person. Students take • Non-refundable $25.00 application the initiative to learn about others and the diverse viewpoints they contribute to society. fee Their passion for learning is rooted in their deep respect for students, parents, and • Completed application form colleagues; a respect that prompts them to provide the kind of instruction that will maximize student achievement and challenge themselves and others to think deeply • One official transcript from each about their experiences and their learning. As a consequence, our graduates lead undergraduate and graduate by example and model for their students and colleagues the intellectual and moral rigor school attended that characterizes the very best educators. • Two recommendation forms/letters of reference. Academic Programs • 1-2 page (250-500 word) personal For those seeking teacher certification – Initial Teacher Certification statement discussing your interest Initial teacher certification programs are designed for individuals with an undergraduate in the education field, future degree in a field other than education. While earning a Master’s degree, students also professional plans, and goals meet the state certification requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Supporting the Professional Needs of Alternatively Certified Secondary Education Teachers
    Walden University ScholarWorks Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection 2016 Supporting the Professional Needs of Alternatively Certified econdS ary Education Teachers Michelle Latrice Washington Walden University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations Part of the Elementary and Middle and Secondary Education Administration Commons, and the Secondary Education and Teaching Commons This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection at ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. : Walden University College of Education This is to certify that the doctoral study by Michelle L. Washington has been found to be complete and satisfactory in all respects, and that any and all revisions required by the review committee have been made. Review Committee Dr. Brett Welch, Committee Chairperson, Education Faculty Dr. Glenn Penny, Committee Member, Education Faculty Dr. Tammy Hoffman, University Reviewer, Education Faculty Chief Academic Officer Eric Riedel, Ph.D. Walden University 2016 : : Abstract Supporting the Professional Needs of Alternatively Certified Secondary Education Teachers by Michelle L. Washington MS, Alabama State University, 1999 BS, Troy State University, 1995 Doctoral Study Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Education Walden University August 2016 : : Abstract The reliance on alternative teacher certification to address teacher quality and quantity is an educational issue worthy of study because non-traditionally prepared teachers fill the nation’s classrooms. This qualitative case study explored the experiences of secondary education teachers with no preservice training who earned a professional educator certificate in Alabama through the alternative baccalaureate-level program.
    [Show full text]
  • How and Why Do Teacher Credentials Matter for Student Achievement?
    How and Why Do Teacher Credentials Matter for Student Achievement? C HARLES T. C LOTFELTER H ELEN F. L ADD J A C OB L. V IGDOR w o r k i n g p a p e r 2 • m a r c h 2 0 0 7 How and why do teacher credentials matter for student achievement?* Charles T. Clotfelter Helen F. Ladd Jacob L. Vigdor Sanford Institute, Duke University Corresponding author: Helen F. Ladd. [email protected]. Revised, January 2007 *This paper is a revised version of a paper initially prepared for a conference organized by the World Bank on “The Contribution of Economics to the Challenges Faced by Education,” Dijon, France, June 2006. An earlier version of this paper was presented in March 2006 at the annual meetings of the American Education Finance Association, Denver, Colorado. The authors are grateful to the Spencer Foundation and the National Center for the Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research (CALDER) housed at the Urban Institute (U.S. Department of Education Grant Award No. R305A060018), for support for this project, to the North Carolina Education Research Data Center for the data, and to Aaron Hedlund for excellent research assistance. Other research assistants, including Trip Stallings and Roger Aliaga-Diaz, contributed to earlier stages of this research project. We are grateful to them all. CALDER working papers have not gone through final formal review and should be cited as working papers. They are intended to encourage discussion and suggestions for revision before final publication. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in these papers are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Urban Institute, the U.S.
    [Show full text]