DOCSLIB.ORG

Image Registration in Medical Imaging

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Image Registration in Medical Imaging 2/2/2012 Medical Imaging Analysis Image Registration in Medical Imaging y Developing mathematical algorihms to extract and relate information from medical images y Two related aspects of research BI260 { Image Registration VALERIE CARDENAS NICOLSON, PH.D Ù Fin ding spatia l/tempora l correspondences between image data and/or models ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: { Image segmentation Ù Extracting/detecting specific features of interest from image data COLIN STUDHOLME, PH.D. LUCAS AND KANADE, PROC IMAGE UNDERSTANDING WORKSHOP, 1981 Medical Imaging Regsitration: Overview Registration y What is registration? { Definition “the determination of a one-to-one mapping between the coordinates in one space and those in { Classifications: Geometry, Transformations, Measures another, such that points in the two spaces that y Motivation for work correspond to the same anatomical point are mapped to each other.” { Where is image regiistrat ion used in medic ine and biome dica l research? Calvin Maurer ‘93 y Measures of image alignment { Landmark/feature based methods { Voxel-based methods Ù Image intensity difference and correlation Ù Multi-modality measures 1 2/2/2012 Image Registration Key Applications I: Change detection y Look for differences in the same type of images taken at different times, e.g.: { Mapping pre and post contrast agent “Establishing correspondence, Ù Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) between features Ù MRI with gadolinium tracer in sets of images, and { Mapping structural changes using a transformation model to Ù Different stages in tumor growth (before and after treatment) infer correspondence Ù Neurodegenerative disease-> qqyguantifying tissue loss p atterns away from those features.” { Detecting changes due to function Ù Functional MRI (fMRI): before and after brain stimulus Bill Crum ‘05 Ù PET imaging: quantitative tracer uptake measurements y Problem: { Subject scanned multiple times-> removed from scanner { We cannot easily fix/know patient location and orientation with respect to imaging system { Need to remove differences in patient positioning to detect true differences in patient images Key Applications II: Image Fusion Components of Image Registration Algorithms y Relate contrasting information from different types of y Image Data Geometries images { 2D-2D, 2D-3D, 3D-3D y Multi-modality imaging y Transformation type { MRI-CT { Rigid/affine/non-rigid { MRI-PET/SPECT { Structural MRI-functional MRI y Correspondence criteria/measure { Structural MRI to structural MRI { Feature based methods y Problem: { voxel based/dense field methods { Subject scanned multiple times-> different scanners { We cannot easily fix/know patient location and orientation with y Optimization method respect to different imaging systems { Maximizing/minimizing criteria with respect to transform { Need to remove differences in patient positioning to relate information from different types of images 2 2/2/2012 2D-2D Inter-modality image registration problem Registration and display of the combined bone scan and radiograph in the Examples of Image Geometries and diagnosis and management of write injuries, Hawkes et al., EJNM 1991 Transformation Models in Medical Applications 2D-2D image transformations 2D-2D image transformations y Simple case: parallel projection { 2 translations t1 and t2 (up-down/left-right) and one rotation (θ) This is a linear mapping from (x1,x2) to (y1, y2) y1=x1cos θ-x2sin θ+t1 y2=x1sin θ+x2cos θ+t2 3 2/2/2012 Rotating around a given location Image Scaling y Scaling with respect to a fixed point (x,y) y Scaling along an arbitrary axis Influence of Affine Transformations on Images Composing Transformations y Map lines to lines y Map parallel lines to parallel lines y Preserve ratios of distances along a line y Do NOT ppgreserve absolute distances and angles 4 2/2/2012 2D-3D registration problems 2D-3D Registration Geometry y Radiotherapy “the determination of a projection mapping, { Treatment verification (Portal images) from a 3D to a 2D coordinate system such that points in each space which correspond to the { Treatment planning (simulator system) same anatomical points are mapped to each { Treatment guidance (Cyberknife system) other.” y Orthopaedic surgery { Spinal surgery (Brain Lab, Medtronic) { Hip or Knee arthroplasty (ROBODOC) Ù Verification of implant position y Neurointerventions { Matching MRA to DSA y Surgical microscope { MRI/CT neurosurgery guidance y Virtual endoscopy (A) Imaging/Acquisition parameters (intrinsic) (B) Subject Parameters (extrinsic) 5 2/2/2012 3D-3D image registration 3D Rigid Transformations ⎡x'⎤ ⎡t11 t12 t13 t14 ⎤⎡x⎤ y Many different 3D clinical imaging modalities ⎢y'⎥ ⎢t t t t ⎥⎢y⎥ ⎢ ⎥ = ⎢ 21 22 23 24 ⎥⎢ ⎥ { MRI probably still the least common ⎢z'⎥ ⎢t31 t32 t33 t34 ⎥⎢z⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎣1 ⎦ ⎣t41 t42 t43 t44 ⎦⎣1⎦ y Images used in many different clinical settings ⎡1 0 0 0⎤ ⎡cos β 0 − sin β 0⎤ ⎡ cosθ sinθ 0 0⎤ { Diagnosis ⎢0 cosα sinα 0⎥ ⎢ 0 1 0 0⎥ ⎢− sinθ cosθ 0 0⎥ R = ⎢ ⎥ R = ⎢ ⎥ R = ⎢ ⎥ { Treatment planning x ⎢0 − sinα cosα 0⎥ y ⎢sin β 0 cos β 0⎥ z ⎢ 0 0 1 0⎥ { Treatment guidance ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎣0 0 0 1⎦ ⎣ 0 0 0 1⎦ ⎣ 0 0 0 1⎦ { Clinical research: studying disease z θ ⎡1 0 0 x0 ⎤ y Transformation types: ⎢ ⎥ 0 1 0 y1 { Rigid positioning of subject: still most common T = ⎢ ⎥ ⎢0 0 1 z1 ⎥ { Non-rigid deformations to describe y ⎢ ⎥ Ù Tissue deformation α ⎣0 0 0 1 ⎦ Ù Imaging distortion β Ù Differences between subjects x Feature Based Approaches y Point set -> Point set (homologous) y Point set -> Point set (non homologous… so need to find order) y Point set -> Surface y Surface -> Surface (also Curve->Surface) 6 2/2/2012 MR-CT Registration Homologous Feature Based Alignment y Manual point landmark y General case of two lists of identification (around 12 corresponding feature locations points) in MR and CT { [p1, p2,…,pN] and { [q1, q2,…,qN] both with N points y Relates soft tissue structures such as y We want to find: enhancing tumor and TfTransforma tion T(q) tha t minimizes squared distance blood flow to bone between corresponding points: features in CT 2 E = ∑ pr −T (qr ) r y Where one set of points, q, is transformed by T() -> Extrapolate Transformation for all image voxels/pixels Procrustes Point Alignment Golub and VanLoan, Matrix Computations, 1989 Procrustes Point Alignment y Remove translational differences y Scale (procrustes normally includes estimate of scaling) { Calculate translation that brings each of the point sets to { But we can assume scanner voxel dimensions are accurate the origin and subtract from each of the point sets to create centered point sets 1 y It is possible to show that the rotation solution is: q'i = qi − ∑qi N i 1 p'i = pi − ∑ pi T N i R=VU Rewrite centered point lists as matrices ⎡ p'1 ⎤ ⎡x1 y1 z1 ⎤ ⎡ q'1 ⎤ ⎡x'1 y'1 z'1 ⎤ where U and V are matrices obtained ⎢ p' ⎥ ⎢x y z ⎥ ⎢q' ⎥ ⎢x' y' z' ⎥ T P = ⎢ 2 ⎥ = ⎢ 2 2 2 ⎥ Q = ⎢ 2 ⎥ = ⎢ 2 2 2 ⎥ from the SVD of P Q ⎢ M ⎥ ⎢ M M M ⎥ ⎢ M ⎥ ⎢ M M M ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ p' x y z q' x' y' z' ⎣ N ⎦ ⎣ 3 3 3 ⎦ ⎣ N ⎦ ⎣ 3 3 3 ⎦ Recall that (PTQ->(USVT) { Estimate rotations: find the rotation matrix R such that PT=RQT S is a diagonal matrix, U and V are matrices K.S. Arun, T.S. Huang, and S.D. Blostein, Least square fitting of two 3-d point sets. IEEE PAMI, containing the left and right singular vectors. T T The system P =RQ is over-determined and there is 9(5):698-700, 1987. noise, thus we want to find the rotation matrix For 2D: ⎡cosθ − sinθ ⎤ R such that VU T = T T 2 ⎢ ⎥ minR=|| P -RQ || ⎣sinθ cosθ ⎦ 7 2/2/2012 Extrapolating Transformations: Theoretical point based registration error Alternatives to SVD alignment (points on circle 50 mm radius selected with RMS error of 2mm) y Quaternion methods { Horn, Closed-form solution of absolute orientation using unit quaternions. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 4(4):629-642, 1987. y Orthonormal matrices { Horn et al., Closed-form solution of absolute orientation using orthonormal matrices. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 5(7):1127-1135, July 1988. y Dual quaternions { Walker et al., Estimating 3-d location parameters using dual number quaternions. CVGIP: Image Understanding, 54:358-367, November 1991. y These algorithms generally show similar performance and stability with real world noisy data { Loruss et al., A comparison of four algorithms for estimating 3-D rigid transformations. In Proceedings of the 4th British machine conference (BVMC ‘95), pages 237-246, Birmingham, England, September 1995. Important factor: registration lowest where 3D landmarks are found The distribution of target registration error in rigid-body point-based registration. Fitzpatrick and West, IEEE TMI, 20(9): 2001, 917-927. Approaches to Landmark/Feature Extraction and Matching y Markers attached to subject Early feature based brain/head matching { Need to be visible in different types of images { Hawkes et al., Registration and display of the combined bone scan and radiograph in the diagnosis and management of wrist injuries, EJNM 1991. y Manual landmark identification { Time consuming, introduce errors, difficult to find true consistent 3D landmarks, but VERY flexible and can adapt to data { Hill et al., Accurate frameless registration of MR and CT images of the head: Applications in surgery and radiotherapy planning, Radiology 1994, 447-454. y Automated landmark identification: geometric models of local anatomy { Need to be true unique 3D point in intensity map: tip-like, saddle-like, and sphere like structures { Need to be consistent in different subjects and image types { Worz and Rohr, Localization of anatomical point landmarks in 3D medical images by fitting 3D parametric intensity models, Medical Image Analysis 10(1):41-58, 2006. y Non-homologous landmarks/3D structures { Easier to automatically find general features: for example point on a surface using edge detection { But: which point maps to which point? “Head-hat” matching of head surfaces { Need to then find correspondence and alignment: point cloud fitting Retrospective geometric correlation of MR, CT and PET images, Levin et al., Radiology 1988.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PET-CT Image Registration in the Chest Using Free-Form Deformations David Mattes, David R
    120 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, VOL. 22, NO. 1, JANUARY 2003 PET-CT Image Registration in the Chest Using Free-form Deformations David Mattes, David R. Haynor, Hubert Vesselle, Thomas K. Lewellen, and William Eubank Abstract—We have implemented and validated an algorithm tered. The idea can still be used that, if a candidate registration for three-dimensional positron emission tomography transmis- matches a set of similar features in the first image to a set of sion-to-computed tomography registration in the chest, using features in the second image that are also mutually similar, it is mutual information as a similarity criterion. Inherent differences in the two imaging protocols produce significant nonrigid motion probably correct [23]. For example, according to the principle of between the two acquisitions. A rigid body deformation combined mutual information, homogeneous regions of the first image set with localized cubic B-splines is used to capture this motion. The should generally map into homogeneous regions in the second deformation is defined on a regular grid and is parameterized set [1], [2]. The utility of information theoretic measures arises by potentially several thousand coefficients. Together with a from the fact that they make no assumptions about the actual spline-based continuous representation of images and Parzen histogram estimates, our deformation model allows closed-form intensity values in the images, but instead measure statistical expressions for the criterion and its gradient. A limited-memory relationships between the two images [24]. Rather than mea- quasi-Newton optimization algorithm is used in a hierarchical sure correlation of intensity values in corresponding regions of multiresolution framework to automatically align the images.
    [Show full text]
  • Unsupervised 3D End-To-End Medical Image Registration with Volume Tweening Network
    1 Unsupervised 3D End-to-End Medical Image Registration with Volume Tweening Network Shengyu Zhaoy, Tingfung Lauy, Ji Luoy, Eric I-Chao Chang, Yan Xu∗ Abstract—3D medical image registration is of great clinical im- portance. However, supervised learning methods require a large amount of accurately annotated corresponding control points (or morphing), which are very difficult to obtain. Unsupervised learning methods ease the burden of manual annotation by exploiting unlabeled data without supervision. In this paper, we propose a new unsupervised learning method using convolu- (a) fixed (b) moving (c) deformation (d) warped tional neural networks under an end-to-end framework, Volume Figure 1: Illustration of 3D medical image registration. Given a fixed image (a) and a Tweening Network (VTN), for 3D medical image registration. moving image (b), a deformation field (c) indicates the displacement of each voxel in the fixed image to the moving image (represented by a grid skewed according to the field). We propose three innovative technical components: (1) An An image (d) similar to the fixed one can be produced by warping the moving image end-to-end cascading scheme that resolves large displacement; with the flow. The images are rendered by mapping grayscale to white with transparency (2) An efficient integration of affine registration network; and (the more intense, the more opaque) and dimetrically projecting the volume. (3) An additional invertibility loss that encourages backward consistency. Experiments demonstrate that our algorithm is 880x faster (or 3.3x faster without GPU acceleration) than [4], [5]. Most of them define a hypothesis space of possible traditional optimization-based methods and achieves state-of-the- art performance in medical image registration.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning Deformable Registration of Medical Images with Anatomical Constraints
    Learning Deformable Registration of Medical Images with Anatomical Constraints Lucas Mansilla, Diego H. Milone, Enzo Ferrante Research institute for signals, systems and computational intelligence, sinc(i) FICH-UNL, CONICET Santa Fe, Argentina Abstract Deformable image registration is a fundamental problem in the field of medical image analysis. During the last years, we have witnessed the advent of deep learning-based image registration methods which achieve state-of-the-art performance, and drastically reduce the required computational time. However, little work has been done regarding how can we encourage our models to produce not only accurate, but also anatomically plausible results, which is still an open question in the field. In this work, we argue that incorporating anatomical priors in the form of global constraints into the learning process of these models, will further improve their performance and boost the realism of the warped images after registration. We learn global non-linear representations of image anatomy using segmentation masks, and employ them to constraint the registration process. The proposed AC-RegNet architecture is evaluated in the context of chest X-ray image registration using three different datasets, where the high anatomical variability makes the task extremely challenging. Our experiments show that the proposed anatomically constrained registration model produces more realistic and accurate results than state-of-the-art methods, demonstrating the potential of this approach. Keywords: medical image registration, convolutional neural networks, x-ray image analysis 1. Introduction arXiv:2001.07183v2 [eess.IV] 22 Jan 2020 Deformable image registration is one of the pillar problems in the field of medical im- age analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Registration and Normalization of Images
    + Human Brain Mapping 2965-189(1995) + Spatial Registration and Normalization of Images K.J. Friston, J. Ashburner, C.D. Frith, J.-B. Poline, J.D. Heather, and R.S.J. Frackowiak The Wellcome Department of Cognitive Neurology, The lnstitute of Neurology, Queen Square, and the MRC Cyclotron Unit, London, United Kingdom Abstract: This paper concerns the spatial and intensity transformations that map one image onto another. We present a general technique that facilitates nonlinear spatial (stereotactic) normalization and image realignment. This technique minimizes the sum of squares between two images following nonlinear spatial deformations and transformations of the voxel (intensity) values. The spatial and intensity transformations are obtained simultaneously, and explicitly, using a least squares solution and a series of linearising devices. The approach is completely noninteractive (automatic), nonlinear, and noniterative. It can be applied in any number of dimensions. Various applications are considered, including the realignment of functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) time-series, the linear (affine) and nonlinear spatial normalization of positron emission tomography (PET) and structural MRI images, the coregistration of PET to structural MRI, and, implicitly, the conjoining of PET and MRI to obtain high resolution functional images. o 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc. Key words: realignment, registration, anatomy, imaging, stereotaxy, morphometrics, basis functions, spatial normalization, PET, MRI, functional mapping + + INTRODUCTION [e.g., Fox et al., 1988; Friston et al., 1991aj. Anatomical variability and structural changes due to pathology This paper is about the spatial transformation of can be framed in terms of the transformations re- image processes. Spatial transformations are both quired to map the abnormal onto the normal.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Deformable Image Registration for Radiotherapy Applications
    Journal of Central Radiology & Radiation Therapy Special Issue on Cancer Radiation Therapy Edited by: Keiichi Jingu, MD, PhD Professor, Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan Review Article *Corresponding author Noriyuki Kadoya, Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo- Use of Deformable Image machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan, Tel: +81- 22-717-7312; Fax: +81-22-717-7316; Email: Registration for Radiotherapy Submitted: 22 January 2014 Accepted: 27 February 2014 Applications Published: 11 March 2014 ISSN: 2333-7095 Noriyuki Kadoya* Copyright Departments of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Japan © 2014 Kadoya OPEN ACCESS Abstract Deformable Image Registration (DIR) has become commercially available in the Keywords field of radiotherapy. DIR is an exciting and interesting technology for multi-modality • Radiotherapy image fusion, anatomic image segmentation, Four-dimensional (4D) dose accumulation • Deformable image registration and lung functional (ventilation) imaging. Furthermore, DIR is playing an important role • Adaptive radiotherapy in modern radiotherapy included Image-Guided Radiotherapy (IGRT) and Adaptive • Image fusion Radiotherapy (ART). DIR is essential to link the anatomy at one time to another while • 4D CT maintaining the desirable one-to-one geographic mapping. The first part focused on the description of image registration process. Next, typical applications of DIR were reviewed on the four practical examples; dose accumulation, auto segmentation, 4D dose calculation and 4D-CT derived ventilation imaging. Finally, the methods of validation for DIR were reviewed and explained how to validate the accuracy of DIR. INTRODUCTION Deformable image registration In recent year, Deformable Image Registration (DIR) has Image registration is a method of aligning two images into become commercially available in the field of radiotherapy.
    [Show full text]
  • Image Registration for MRI
    Modern Signal Processing MSRI Publications Volume 46, 2003 Image Registration for MRI PETER J. KOSTELEC AND SENTHIL PERIASWAMY Abstract. To register two images means to align them so that common features overlap and differences — for example, a tumor that has grown — are readily apparent. Being able to easily spot differences between two images is obviously very important in applications. This paper is an intro- duction to image registration as applied to medical imaging. We first define image registration, breaking the problem down into its constituent compo- nent. We then discuss various techniques, reflecting different choices that can be made in developing an image registration technique. We conclude with a brief discussion. 1. Introduction 1.1. Background. To register two images means to align them, so that com- mon features overlap and differences, should there be any, between the two are emphasized and readily visible to the naked eye. We refer to the process of aligning two images as image registration. There are a host of clinical applications requiring image registration. For example, one would like to compare two Computed Tomography (CT) scans of a patient, taken say six months ago and yesterday, and identify differences between the two, e.g., the growth of a tumor during the intervening six months (Figure 1). One could also want to align Positron Emission Tomography (PET) data to an MR image, so as to help identify the anatomic location of certain mental activation [43]. And one may want to register lung surfaces in chest Computed Tomography (CT) scans for lung cancer screening [7]. While all of these identifications can be done in the radiologist’s head, the possibility always exists that small, but critical, features could be missed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Spatial Normalization for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data Analyses Revisited
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/272302; this version posted February 26, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Smith et al. Spatial Normalization Revisited 1 The Impact of Spatial Normalization for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data Analyses Revisited Jason F. Smith1 Juyoen Hur1 Claire M. Kaplan1 Alexander J. Shackman1,2,3 1Department of Psychology, 2Neuroscience and Cognitive Science Program, and 3Maryland Neuroimaging Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 USA. Figures: 3 Tables: 4 Supplementary Materials: Supplementary Results Keywords: alignment, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) methodology, registration, spatial normalization Address Correspondence to: Jason F. Smith ([email protected]) or Alexander J. Shackman ([email protected]) Biology-Psychology Building University of Maryland College Park MD 20742 USA bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/272302; this version posted February 26, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Smith et al. Spatial Normalization Revisited 2 ABSTRACT Spatial normalization—the process of aligning anatomical or functional data acquired from different individuals to a common stereotaxic atlas—is routinely used in the vast majority of functional neuroimaging studies, with important consequences for scientific inference and reproducibility. Although several approaches exist, multi-step techniques that leverage the superior contrast and spatial resolution afforded by T1-weighted anatomical images to normalize echo planar imaging (EPI) functional data acquired from the same individuals (T1EPI) is now standard.
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Image Analysis and New Image Registration Technique Using Mutual Information and Optimization Technique Sumitha Manoj1, S
    Original Article Medical Image Analysis and New Image Registration Technique Using Mutual Information and Optimization Technique Sumitha Manoj1, S. Ranjitha2 and H.N. Suresh*3 1Department of ECE, Jain University, Bangalore, Karnataka, India 2Final BE (ECE), Bangalore Institute of Technology, vv puram, Bangalore-04, India 3Department of Electronics and Instrumentation Engg., Bangalore–04, Karnataka, India *Corresponding Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT Registration is a fundamental task in image processing used to match two or more pictures taken, for example, at different times, from different sensors, or from different viewpoints. Accurate assessment of lymph node status is of crucial importance for appropriate treatment planning and determining prognosis in patients with gastric cancer. The aim of this study was to systematically review the current role of imaging in assessing lymph node (LN) status in gastric cancer. The Virtual Navigator is an advanced system allows the real time visualization of ultrasound images with other reference images. Here we are using gastric cancer MRI, gastric cancer CT and gastric cancer PET scanning techniques as a reference image and we are comparing all the three fusion imaging modalities. The objective of this research is to registering and fusing the different brain scanning imaging modalities by keeping Ultrasound (US) as base image and Positron Emission Tomography, Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a reference image, the efficiency and accuracy of these three fused imaging modalities are compared after fusion. Fused image will give better image quality, higher resolution, helps in image guided surgery and also increases the clinical diagnostic information. Keywords: Image registration, Virtual navigator, Image fusion, Gastric cancer.
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Image Registration Computational Anatomy & Physiology
    Computational Anatomy & Physiology M2 BioComp 2013-2014 http://www-sop.inria.fr/teams/asclepios/cours/CBB-2013-2014/ X. Pennec Medical Image registration Asclepios team 2004, route des Lucioles B.P. 93 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex http://www-sop.inria.fr/asclepios 1 Goals of Registration A dual problem Find the point y of image J which is corresponding (homologous) to each points x of image I. Determine the best transformation T that superimposes homologous points T yk xk J I 2 Principal Applications Fusion of multimodal images Temporal evolution of a pathology Inter-subject comparisons Superposition of an atlas Augmented reality 3 1 Fusion of Multimodal Images MRI PET X-scan Histology US Visible Man 4 Temporal Evolution coronal coronal Time 1 Time 2 sagittal axial sagittal axial 5 Inter-Subject comparison 6 2 Registration to an Atlas Voxel Man 7 Augmented reality Brigham & Women ’s Hospital E. Grimson 8 Classes of problems vs. applications Temporal evolution Intra Subject – Monomodal Multimodal image fusion Intra Subject - Multimodal Inter-subject comparison Inter Subject - Monomodal Superposition on an atlas Inter Subject - Multimodal Intra Subject: Rigid or deformable Inter Subject: deformable 9 3 Intuitive Example How to register these two images? 10 Feature-based/Image-based approach Feature detection (here, points of high curvature) 2 Measure: for instance S(T) T (xk ) y k k 11 Feature-based/Image-based approach Feature detection (here, points of high curvature) 2 Measure: for instance S(T) T (xk ) y k k 12 4 Feature-based/Image-based approach No segmentation! 2 S(T ) (i j ) Interpolation: j J(T(x )) Measure: e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Image Registration of 18F-FDG PET/CT Using the Motionfree Algorithm and CT Protocols Through Phantom Study and Clinical Evaluation
    healthcare Article Image Registration of 18F-FDG PET/CT Using the MotionFree Algorithm and CT Protocols through Phantom Study and Clinical Evaluation Deok-Hwan Kim 1, Eun-Hye Yoo 1, Ui-Seong Hong 1, Jun-Hyeok Kim 1, Young-Heon Ko 1, Seung-Cheol Moon 2, Miju Cheon 1 and Jang Yoo 1,* 1 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Veterans Health Service Medical Center, Seoul 05368, Korea; [email protected] (D.-H.K.); [email protected] (E.-H.Y.); [email protected] (U.-S.H.); [email protected] (J.-H.K.); [email protected] (Y.-H.K.); [email protected] (M.C.) 2 General Electronic Healthcare, Seoul 04637, Korea; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-2-2225-4068 Abstract: We evaluated the benefits of the MotionFree algorithm through phantom and patient studies. The various sizes of phantom and vacuum vials were linked to RPM moving with or without MotionFree application. A total of 600 patients were divided into six groups by breathing protocols and CT scanning time. Breathing protocols were applied as follows: (a) patients who underwent scanning without any breathing instructions; (b) patients who were instructed to hold their breath after expiration during CT scan; and (c) patients who were instructed to breathe naturally. The length of PET/CT misregistration was measured and we defined the misregistration when it exceeded 10 mm. In the phantom tests, the images produced by the MotionFree algorithm were Citation: Kim, D.-H.; Yoo, E.-H.; observed to have excellent agreement with static images. There were significant differences in Hong, U.-S.; Kim, J.-H.; Ko, Y.-H.; Moon, S.-C.; Cheon, M.; Yoo, J.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of Medical Image Registration
    Med cal Image Analys s (1998) volume 2, number 1, pp 1–37 c Oxford University Press A Survey of Medical Image Registration J. B. Antoine Maintz and Max A. Viergever Image Sciences Institute, Utrecht University Hospital, Utrecht, the Netherlands Abstract The purpose of this chapter is to present a survey of recent publications concerning medical image registration techniques. These publications will be classified according to a model based on nine salient criteria, the main dichotomy of which is extrinsic versus intrinsic methods The statistics of the classification show definite trends in the evolving registration techniques, which will be discussed. At this moment, the bulk of interesting intrinsic methods is either based on segmented points or surfaces, or on techniques endeavoring to use the full information content of the images involved. Keywords: registration, matching Received May 25, 1997; revised October 10, 1997; accepted October 16, 1997 1. INTRODUCTION tomographyd), PET (positron emission tomographye), which together make up the nuclear medicine imaging modalities, Within the current clinical setting, medical imaging is a and fMRI (functional MRI). With a little imagination, spa- vital component of a large number of applications. Such tially sparse techniques like, EEG (electro encephalography), applications occur throughout the clinical track of events; and MEG (magneto encephalography) can also be named not only within clinical diagnostis settings, but prominently functional imaging techniques. Many more functional modal- so in the area of planning, consummation, and evaluation ities can be named, but these are either little used, or still in of surgical and radiotherapeutical procedures. The imaging the pre-clinical research stage, e.g., pMRI (perfusion MRI), modalities employed can be divided into two global cate- fCT (functional CT), EIT (electrical impedance tomography), gories: anatomical and functional.
    [Show full text]
  • Statistical Shape Model Generation Using Nonrigid Deformation of a Template Mesh
    Statistical Shape Model Generation Using Nonrigid Deformation of a Template Mesh Geremy Heitza, Torsten Rohl¯ngb, Calvin R. Maurer, Jr.c aDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 bNeuroscience Program, SRI International, Menlo Park, CA 94025 cDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 ABSTRACT Active shape models (ASMs) have been studied extensively for the statistical analysis of three-dimensional shapes. These models can be used as prior information for segmentation and other image analysis tasks. In order to create an ASM, correspondence between surface points on the training shapes must be provided. Various groups have previously investigated methods that attempted to provide correspondences between points on pre-segmented shapes. This requires a time-consuming segmentation stage before the statistical analysis can be performed. This paper presents a method of ASM generation that requires as input only a single segmented template shape obtained from a mean grayscale image across the training set. The triangulated mesh representing this template shape is then propagated to the other shapes in the training set by a nonrigid transformation. The appropriate transformation is determined by intensity-based nonrigid registration of the corresponding grayscale images. Following the transformation of the template, the mesh is treated as an active surface, and evolves towards the image edges while preserving certain curvature constraints. This process results in automatic segmentation of each shape, but more importantly also provides an automatic correspondence between the points on each shape. The resulting meshes are aligned using Procrustes analysis, and a principal component analysis is performed to produce the statistical model. For demonstration, a model of the lower cervical vertebrae (C6 and C7) was created.
    [Show full text]