Topics in Group Representation Theory

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Topics in Group Representation Theory Topics in Group Representation Theory Peter Webb October 2, 2017 Contents 0.1 Representations of Sr ............................1 0.2 Polynomial representations of GLn(k)...................1 0.3 Representations of GL(Fpn ).........................2 0.4 Functorial methods . .2 1 Dual spaces and bilinear forms 3 2 Representations of Sr 4 2.1 Tableaux and tabloids . .4 2.2 Permutation modules . .5 2.2.1 Exercise . .7 2.3 p-regular partitions . .7 2.4 Young modules . .9 3 The Schur algebra 11 3.1 Tensor space . 11 3.2 Homomorphisms between permutation modules . 14 3.3 The structure of endomorphism rings . 15 3.4 The radical . 17 3.5 Projective covers, Nakayama's lemma and lifting of idempotents . 20 3.6 Projective modules for finite dimensional algebras . 24 3.7 Cartan invariants . 26 3.8 Projective and simple modules for SF (n; r)................ 28 3.9 Duality and the Schur algebra . 30 4 Polynomial representations of GLn(F ) 33 4.0.1 Multi-indices . 39 4.1 Weights and Characters . 40 5 Connections between the Schur algebra and the symmetric group: the Schur functor 47 5.1 The general theory of the functor f : B -mod ! eBe -mod . 51 5.2 Applications . 51 i CONTENTS ii 6 Representations of the category of vector spaces 54 6.1 Simple representations of the matrix monoid . 55 6.2 Simple representations of categories and the category algebra . 57 6.3 Parametrization of simple and projective representations . 60 6.4 Projective functors . 63 7 Bibliography 68 Landmark Theorems 0.1 Representations of Sr λ Theorem 0.1.1. The simple representations D of Sr over Fp are parametrized by p-regular partitions λ of r. They are self-dual and absolutely irreducible. Other properties: The Specht module Sλ has one composition factor Dλ and all µ others are D with µ D λ. Theorem 0.1.2. As µ ranges over partitions of r, the indecomposable summands Y λ of M µ = "Sr are parametrized by the partitions λ of r. Each permutation module Fp Sµ µ µ λ M has a summand Y with multiplicity 1, and all other summands M have λ D µ. Other properties: The M λ have a Specht filtration. M λ is projective if and only if λ0 is p-regular. We will avoid the usual things done in characteristic zero in other courses: con- struction of the character table, hook length formula, Murnaghan-Nakayama etc etc. 0.2 Polynomial representations of GLn(k) n ⊗r Let k be a field of characteristic p and E = k . Sr acts on E by permuting the positions of the tensor factors, and E⊗r is a direct sum of permutation modules M λ. We ⊗r define Sk(n; r) = EndkSr (E ). This is the Schur algebra associated to this situation. Theorem 0.2.1. Sk(n; r) is quasi-hereditary. When n ≥ r all the Sk(n; r) are Morita equivalent. The simple Sk(n; r)-modules are parametrized by partitions of r into at most n parts. Theorem 0.2.2. The polynomial representations of GL(n(k)) are direct sums of ho- mogeneous polynomial representations of various degrees r. Theorem 0.2.3. When k is infinite the algebra homomorphism k[GLn(k)] ! Sk(n; r) is surjective. The polynomial representations of degree r are the same as the represen- tations of Sk(n; r). When n ≥ r the simple polynomial representations of degree r are parametrized by the partitions of r. 1 CONTENTS 2 0.3 Representations of GL(Fpn ) Theorem 0.3.1. The simple Fpn GL(Fpn )-modules are parametrized by `weights' and are absolutely simple. Thus, for any field k of characteristic p, the simple kGL(Fpn )- n modules can all be written in Fp . 0.4 Functorial methods Writing Veck for the category of finite dimensional vector spaces over k we consider the category Funk of functors Veck ! Veck. This is an abelian category. For example, 17 6 the functor V 7! S V and the functor V 7! Λ V lie in Funk. Theorem 0.4.1. The simple objects in Funk are parametrized by pairs (n; W ) where n ≥ 0 and W is a simple representation of GLn(k). The corresponding simple functor sends kn to W and is zero on spaces of dimension < n. Each value on km is a simple module for GLm(k) or zero. Chapter 1 Dual spaces and bilinear forms This follows the first section of James' book and is quite incomplete. ∗ Let M be a finite dimensional vector space over a field k and put M = Homk(M; k). Let V be a subspace of M. We may take a basis e1; : : : ; ek for V and extend it to a ∗ basis e1; : : : ; em for M, so that M has a dual basis 1; : : : ; m with i(ej) = δij. Thus dim M = dim M ∗. ◦ ∗ We put V = ff 2 M fjV = 0g. ◦ ◦ Lemma 1.0.1. V has basis k+1; : : : ; m, so that dim V + dim V = m. Proposition 1.0.2. The vector space of bilinear forms h−; −i : M × M ! k is iso- morphic to Hom(M; M ∗). Proof. Suppose that h−; −i : M × M ! k is a bilinear form on M. There is a map Lemma 1.0.3. A bilinear form is non-singular if and only if the corresponding map θ is injective. Thus if dim M is finite, it is equivalent to require that θ : M ! M ∗ be an isomorphism. We define V ? = fx 2 M hx; vi = 0 for all v 2 V g. Lemma 1.0.4. If U ⊆ V , W are subspaces of M then V ? ⊆ U ? and (U + W )? = U ? \ V ?. Proposition 1.0.5. If h−; −i is non-singular and dim M is finite then θ : M ! M ∗ maps V ? isomorphically to V ◦ and hence dim V + dim V ? = dim M. We have V = V ?? and (U \ V )? = U ? + V ?. 3 Chapter 2 Representations of Sr The approach and results are taken directly from James' book. 2.1 Tableaux and tabloids A partition of r is a list of positive integers λ = [λ1; λ2; λ3;:::] with λ1 ≥ λ2 ≥ λ3 ≥ ::: P and λi = r. Partitions are partially ordered by the dominance relation: we say that Pj Pj λ = [λ1; λ2; λ3;:::] dominates µ = [µ1; µ2; µ3;:::] if for all j, i=1 λi ≥ i=1 µi. For each partition we have a Young subgroup Sλ = Sλ1 × Sλ2 × · · · . The set of right cosets SλnSr is a transitive Sr-set whose elements can be described in a certain way, by means of tabloids. We first define a λ-tableau to be a Young diagram of shape λ filled with the numbers f1; : : : ; rg, such as 5 1 2 t = 4 3 for the partition λ = [3; 2]. The symmetric group Sr permutes the λ-tableaux by acting on their entries. Let Rt and Ct denote the row and column stabilizers of t, so that in this example Rt = Sf5;1;2g × Sf4;3g;Ct = Sf5;4g × Sf1;3g × Sf2g: −1 −1 Lemma 2.1.1. If t is a λ-tableau and π 2 Sr then Rtπ = π Rtπ and Ctπ = π Ctπ. We put an equivalence relation on λ-tableaux by saying that two are equivalent if the numbers in each row are the same. Thus the equivalence class of t is tRt. We write the equivalence class as ftg and denote it pictorially by leaving out the vertical lines: 5 1 2 ftg = 4 3 Such an equivalence class is called a λ-tabloid. The one above is the same as the tabloid 1 2 5 3 4 4 CHAPTER 2. REPRESENTATIONS OF SR 5 and evidently we can write tabloids with the entries increasing along each row. Now Sr permutes the set of tabloids by acting on the entries. The stabilizer of the λ-tabloid with the numbers f1; : : : ; rg written along the rows in order is the Young subgroup Sλ and the action on the λ-tabloids is transitive. Hence: Lemma 2.1.2. The set of λ-tabloids is isomorphic to SλnSr as a Sr-set. The number of λ-tabloids is r! λ1!λ2! ··· The Sr-sets that arise this way include examples such as the set of unordered tuples of elements of f1; : : : ; rg of some given length, or the set of ordered tuples of some given length, or combinations of these possibilities. 2.2 Permutation modules Over a ring k define M λ to be the permutation module on the set of λ-tabloids. Thus M λ =∼ M "Sr , and M λ is generated as a kS -module by any single tabloid. If t is a Sλ r λ-tableau let κt be the element of the group algebra kSr that is the signed sum of the elements of C . Thus t X κt = (sgn π)π: π2Ct λ We define et = ftgκt as an element of M . In the case of the example 5 1 2 t = 4 3 we have 5 1 2 4 1 2 5 3 2 4 3 2 et = − − + : 4 3 5 3 4 1 5 1 The Specht module Sλ for the partition λ is defined to be the submodule of M λ spanned by the polytabloids. Proposition 2.2.1. Let t be a λ-tableau and π 2 Sr. 1. et is a linear combination of tabloids with ±1 coefficients. −1 2. κtπ = π κtπ and etπ = etπ. λ 3. S is a kSr-module and is generated as a kSr-module by any single polytabloid.
Recommended publications
  • Arxiv:1302.5859V2 [Math.RT] 13 May 2015 Upre Ynfflosi DMS-0902661
    STABILITY PATTERNS IN REPRESENTATION THEORY STEVEN V SAM AND ANDREW SNOWDEN Abstract. We develop a comprehensive theory of the stable representation categories of several sequences of groups, including the classical and symmetric groups, and their relation to the unstable categories. An important component of this theory is an array of equivalences between the stable representation category and various other categories, each of which has its own flavor (representation theoretic, combinatorial, commutative algebraic, or categorical) and offers a distinct perspective on the stable category. We use this theory to produce a host of specific results, e.g., the construction of injective resolutions of simple objects, duality between the orthogonal and symplectic theories, a canonical derived auto-equivalence of the general linear theory, etc. Contents 1. Introduction 2 1.1. Overview 2 1.2. Descriptions of stable representation theory 4 1.3. Additional results, applications, and remarks 7 1.4. Relation to other work 10 1.5. Future directions 11 1.6. Organization 13 1.7. Notation and conventions 13 2. Preliminaries 14 2.1. Representations of categories 14 2.2. Polynomial representations of GL(∞) and category V 19 2.3. Twisted commutative algebras 22 2.4. Semi-group tca’s and diagram categories 24 2.5. Profinite vector spaces 25 arXiv:1302.5859v2 [math.RT] 13 May 2015 3. The general linear group 25 3.1. Representations of GL(∞) 25 3.2. The walled Brauer algebra and category 29 3.3. Modules over Sym(Ch1, 1i) 33 3.4. Rational Schur functors, universal property and specialization 36 4. The orthogonal and symplectic groups 39 4.1.
    [Show full text]
  • SCHUR-WEYL DUALITY Contents Introduction 1 1. Representation
    SCHUR-WEYL DUALITY JAMES STEVENS Contents Introduction 1 1. Representation Theory of Finite Groups 2 1.1. Preliminaries 2 1.2. Group Algebra 4 1.3. Character Theory 5 2. Irreducible Representations of the Symmetric Group 8 2.1. Specht Modules 8 2.2. Dimension Formulas 11 2.3. The RSK-Correspondence 12 3. Schur-Weyl Duality 13 3.1. Representations of Lie Groups and Lie Algebras 13 3.2. Schur-Weyl Duality for GL(V ) 15 3.3. Schur Functors and Algebraic Representations 16 3.4. Other Cases of Schur-Weyl Duality 17 Appendix A. Semisimple Algebras and Double Centralizer Theorem 19 Acknowledgments 20 References 21 Introduction. In this paper, we build up to one of the remarkable results in representation theory called Schur-Weyl Duality. It connects the irreducible rep- resentations of the symmetric group to irreducible algebraic representations of the general linear group of a complex vector space. We do so in three sections: (1) In Section 1, we develop some of the general theory of representations of finite groups. In particular, we have a subsection on character theory. We will see that the simple notion of a character has tremendous consequences that would be very difficult to show otherwise. Also, we introduce the group algebra which will be vital in Section 2. (2) In Section 2, we narrow our focus down to irreducible representations of the symmetric group. We will show that the irreducible representations of Sn up to isomorphism are in bijection with partitions of n via a construc- tion through certain elements of the group algebra.
    [Show full text]
  • The Partition Algebra and the Kronecker Product (Extended Abstract)
    FPSAC 2013, Paris, France DMTCS proc. (subm.), by the authors, 1–12 The partition algebra and the Kronecker product (Extended abstract) C. Bowman1yand M. De Visscher2 and R. Orellana3z 1Institut de Mathematiques´ de Jussieu, 175 rue du chevaleret, 75013, Paris 2Centre for Mathematical Science, City University London, Northampton Square, London, EC1V 0HB, England. 3 Department of Mathematics, Dartmouth College, 6188 Kemeny Hall, Hanover, NH 03755, USA Abstract. We propose a new approach to study the Kronecker coefficients by using the Schur–Weyl duality between the symmetric group and the partition algebra. Resum´ e.´ Nous proposons une nouvelle approche pour l’etude´ des coefficients´ de Kronecker via la dualite´ entre le groupe symetrique´ et l’algebre` des partitions. Keywords: Kronecker coefficients, tensor product, partition algebra, representations of the symmetric group 1 Introduction A fundamental problem in the representation theory of the symmetric group is to describe the coeffi- cients in the decomposition of the tensor product of two Specht modules. These coefficients are known in the literature as the Kronecker coefficients. Finding a formula or combinatorial interpretation for these coefficients has been described by Richard Stanley as ‘one of the main problems in the combinatorial rep- resentation theory of the symmetric group’. This question has received the attention of Littlewood [Lit58], James [JK81, Chapter 2.9], Lascoux [Las80], Thibon [Thi91], Garsia and Remmel [GR85], Kleshchev and Bessenrodt [BK99] amongst others and yet a combinatorial solution has remained beyond reach for over a hundred years. Murnaghan discovered an amazing limiting phenomenon satisfied by the Kronecker coefficients; as we increase the length of the first row of the indexing partitions the sequence of Kronecker coefficients obtained stabilises.
    [Show full text]
  • Boolean Product Polynomials, Schur Positivity, and Chern Plethysm
    BOOLEAN PRODUCT POLYNOMIALS, SCHUR POSITIVITY, AND CHERN PLETHYSM SARA C. BILLEY, BRENDON RHOADES, AND VASU TEWARI Abstract. Let k ≤ n be positive integers, and let Xn = (x1; : : : ; xn) be a list of n variables. P The Boolean product polynomial Bn;k(Xn) is the product of the linear forms i2S xi where S ranges over all k-element subsets of f1; 2; : : : ; ng. We prove that Boolean product polynomials are Schur positive. We do this via a new method of proving Schur positivity using vector bundles and a symmetric function operation we call Chern plethysm. This gives a geometric method for producing a vast array of Schur positive polynomials whose Schur positivity lacks (at present) a combinatorial or representation theoretic proof. We relate the polynomials Bn;k(Xn) for certain k to other combinatorial objects including derangements, positroids, alternating sign matrices, and reverse flagged fillings of a partition shape. We also relate Bn;n−1(Xn) to a bigraded action of the symmetric group Sn on a divergence free quotient of superspace. 1. Introduction The symmetric group Sn of permutations of [n] := f1; 2; : : : ; ng acts on the polynomial ring C[Xn] := C[x1; : : : ; xn] by variable permutation. Elements of the invariant subring Sn (1.1) C[Xn] := fF (Xn) 2 C[Xn]: w:F (Xn) = F (Xn) for all w 2 Sn g are called symmetric polynomials. Symmetric polynomials are typically defined using sums of products of the variables x1; : : : ; xn. Examples include the power sum, the elementary symmetric polynomial, and the homogeneous symmetric polynomial which are (respectively) (1.2) k k X X pk(Xn) = x1 + ··· + xn; ek(Xn) = xi1 ··· xik ; hk(Xn) = xi1 ··· xik : 1≤i1<···<ik≤n 1≤i1≤···≤ik≤n Given a partition λ = (λ1 ≥ · · · ≥ λk > 0) with k ≤ n parts, we have the monomial symmetric polynomial X (1.3) m (X ) = xλ1 ··· xλk ; λ n i1 ik i1; : : : ; ik distinct as well as the Schur polynomial sλ(Xn) whose definition is recalled in Section 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Plethysm and Lattice Point Counting
    Plethysm and lattice point counting Thomas Kahle OvG Universit¨at Magdeburg joint work with M. Micha lek Some representation theory • Finite-dimensional, rational, irreducible representations of GL(n) are indexed by Young diagrams with at most n rows. • The correspondence is via the Schur functor: λ $ Sλ. • Sλ applied to the trivial representation gives an irreducible representation. Example and Convention • Only one row (λ = (d)): SλW = SdW (degree d forms on W ) • Only one column (λ = (1;:::; 1)): Sλ(W ) = Vd W Schur functor plethysm The general plethysm A Schur functor Sµ can be applied to any representation, for instance an irreducible SνW µ ν L λ ⊕cλ • S (S W ) decomposes into λ(S ) . • General plethysm: Determine cλ as a function of (λ, µ, ν). ! impossible? More modest goals { Symmetric powers • Decompose Sd(SkW ) into irreducibles. ! still hard. • Low degree: Fix d, seek function of (k; λ). Proposition (Thrall, 1942) One has GL(W )-module decompositions 2 M ^ M S2(SkW ) = SλW; (SkW ) = SµW; where • λ runs over tableaux with 2k boxes in two rows of even length. • µ runs over tableaux with 2k boxes in two rows of odd length. • Note: Divisibility conditions on the appearing tableaux. • Similar formulas for S3(Sk) obtained by Agaoka, Chen, Duncan, Foulkes, Garsia, Howe, Plunkett, Remmel, Thrall, . • A few things are known about S4(Sk) (Duncan, Foulkes, Howe). • Observation: Tableaux counting formulas get unwieldy quickly. Theorem (KM) λ d k Fix d. For any k 2 N, and λ ` dk, the multiplicity of S in S (S ) is d−1 X Dα X (−1)( 2 ) sgn(π)Q (k; λ ) ; d! α π α`d π2Sd−1 where • Qα are counting functions of parametric lattice polytopes • Dα is the number of permutations of cycle type α.
    [Show full text]
  • Schur Functors in This Lecture We Will Examine the Schur Polynomials and Young Tableaux to Obtain Irreducible Representations of Sl(N +1, C)
    MATH 223A NOTES 2011 LIE ALGEBRAS 91 23. Schur functors In this lecture we will examine the Schur polynomials and Young tableaux to obtain irreducible representations of sl(n +1, C). The construction is based on Fulton’s book “Young Tableaux” which is highly recommended for beginning students because it is a beautifully written book with minimal prerequisites. This will be only in the case of L = sl(n +1,F). Other cases and the proof of the Weyl character formula will be next. First, we construct the irreducible representations V (λi) corresponding to the funda- mental dominant weights λi = 1 + + i. Then we use Young tableaux to find the modules V (λ) inside tensor products··· of these fundamental representations. 23.1. Fundamental representations. Theorem 23.1.1. The fundamental representation V (λj) is equal to the ith exterior power of V = F n+1: V (λ )= jV j ∧ L = sl(n +1,F) acts by the isomorphism sl(n +1,F) ∼= sl(V ). Definition 23.1.2. Recall that the jth exterior power of a vector space V is the quotient of the jth tensor power by all elements of the form w1 wj where the wi are not j ⊗···⊗ distinct. The image of w1 wj in V is denoted w1 wj. When the characteristic of F is not equal to 2, this⊗··· is equivalent⊗ ∧ to saying that∧ the··· wedge∧ is skew symmetric: w w = sgn(σ)w w σ(1) ∧···∧ σ(j) 1 ∧···∧ j If v , ,v is a basis for V then 1 ··· n+1 v v v i1 ∧ i2 ∧···∧ ij for 1 i <i < <i n + 1 is a basis for jV .
    [Show full text]
  • Generalized Bialgebras and Triples of Operads
    Astérisque JEAN-LOUIS LODAY Generalized bialgebras and triples of operads Astérisque, tome 320 (2008) <http://www.numdam.org/item?id=AST_2008__320__R1_0> © Société mathématique de France, 2008, tous droits réservés. L’accès aux archives de la collection « Astérisque » (http://smf4.emath.fr/ Publications/Asterisque/) implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’uti- lisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright. Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques http://www.numdam.org/ 320 ASTERISQUE 2008 GENERALIZED BIALGEBRAS AND TRIPLES OF OPERADS Jean-Louis Loday SOCIÉTÉ MATHÉMATIQUE DE FRANCE Publié avec le concours du CENTRE NATIONAL DE LA RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUE Jean-Louis Loday Institut de Recherche Mathématique Avancée, CNRS et Université de Strasbourg, 7 rue R. Descartes, 67084 Strasbourg (France) [email protected] www-irma.u-strasbg.fr/~loday/ Mathematical classification by subject (2000).— 16A24, 16W30, 17A30, 18D50, 81R60. Keywords. — Bialgebra, generalized bialgebra, Hopf algebra, Cartier-Milnor-Moore, Poincaré-Birkhoff- Witt, operad, prop, triple of operads, primitive part, dendriform algebra, duplicial algebra, pre-Lie algebra, Zinbiel algebra, magmatic algebra, tree, nonassociative algebra. Many thanks to Maria Ronco and to Bruno Vallette for numerous conversations on bialgebras and operads. Thanks to E. Burgunder, B. Presse, R. Holtkamp, Y. Lafont, and M. Livernet for their comments. A special thank to F. Goichot for his careful reading. This work has been partially supported by the "Agence Nationale de la Recherche". We thank the anonymous referee for his/her helpful corrections and comments.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolutions of Homogeneous Bundles on P
    Resolutions of homogeneous bundles on P2 Giorgio Ottaviani Elena Rubei 1 Introduction Homogeneous bundles on P2 = SL(3)/P can be described by representations of the parabolic subgroup P . In 1966 Ramanan proved that if ρ is an irreducible 2 representation of P then the induced bundle Eρ on P is simple and even stable (see [Ram]). Since P is not a reductive group, there is a lot of indecomposable reducible representations of P and to classify homogeneous bundles on P2 and among them the simple ones, the stable ones, etc. by means of the study of the representations of the parabolic subgroup P seems difficult. In this paper our point of view is to consider the minimal free resolution of the bundle. Our aim is to classify homogeneous vector bundles on P2 by means of their minimal resolutions. Precisely we observe that if E is a homogeneous vector bundle on P2 = P(V ) (V complex vector space of dimension 3) there exists a minimal free resolution of E 0 →⊕qO(−q) ⊗C Aq →⊕qO(−q) ⊗C Bq → E → 0 with SL(V )-invariant maps (Aq and Bq are SL(V )-representations) and we char- acterize completely the representations that can occur as Aq and Bq and the maps A → B that can occur (A := ⊕qO(−q) ⊗C Aq, B = ⊕qO(−q) ⊗C Bq). To state the theorem we need some notation. arXiv:math/0401405v2 [math.AG] 22 Apr 2005 Notation 1 Let q, r ∈ N; for every ρ ≥ p, let ϕρ,p be a fixed SL(V )-invariant p,q,r ρ,q,r nonzero map S V ⊗ OP(V )(p) → S V ⊗ OP(V )(ρ) (it is unique up to multiples) ′ p,q,r s.t.
    [Show full text]
  • Schur Functors (A Project for Class)
    Schur Functors (a project for class) R. Vandermolen 1 Introduction In this presentation we will be discussing the Schur functor. For a complex vector space V , the Schur functor gives many irreducible representations of GL(V ), and other important subgroups of GL(V ), it will not be the purpose of this presentation to give this deep of an explanation. We will be concerning ourselves with the basic concepts needed to understand the Schur functor, and finish off by showing that the Schur functor does indeed help us decompose the nth tensor products V ⊗n. We will, for the most part, follow the presentation given in [1], and in turn we will use German gothic font for the symmetric group, and use diagrams in many occasions. With this said, we will not reprove major theorems from [1], instead we will focus our efforts on “filling in" the details of the presentation. We create new lemmas and deliver proofs of these new lemmas in efforts to deliver a fuller exposition on these Schur functors. Before we can begin a discussion of the Schur functor (or Weyl's module), we will need a familiarity with multilinear algebra. 1.1 Preliminaries Now we will deliver the definitions that will be of most interest to us in this presentation. We begin with the definition of the n-th tensor product. Definition 1. For a finite dimensional complex vector space V , and an natural number n, we define the complex n-th tensor product as follows V ⊗n := F (V n)= ∼ where F (V n) is the free abelian group on V n, considered as a set, and ∼ is the equivalence relation defined for v1; :::; vn; v^1; :::; v^n; w1; :::; wn 2 V , as (v1; :::; vn) ∼ (w1; :::; wn) whenever there exists a k 2 C such that k(v1; ::; vn) = (w1; :::; wn), and (v1; ::; vi; :::vn) + (v1; :::; v^i; :::; vn) ∼ (v1; ::; vi +v ^i; ::; vn) One can easily verify that this is indeed an equivalence relation.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1705.07604V2 [Math.CO] 7 Aug 2017 the Irreducible Representation of the General Linear Group Glm with the Highest Weight Λ
    SKEW HOWE DUALITY AND RANDOM RECTANGULAR YOUNG TABLEAUX GRETA PANOVA AND PIOTR SNIADY´ ABSTRACT. We consider the decomposition into irreducible compo- p m n nents of the external power Λ (C ⊗ C ) regarded as a GLm × GLn- module. Skew Howe duality implies that the Young diagrams from each pair (λ, µ) which contributes to this decomposition turn out to be con- jugate to each other, i.e. µ = λ0. We show that the Young diagram λ which corresponds to a randomly selected irreducible component (λ, λ0) has the same distribution as the Young diagram which consists of the boxes with entries ≤ p of a random Young tableau of rectangular shape with m rows and n columns. This observation allows treatment of the asymptotic version of this decomposition in the limit as m; n; p ! 1 tend to infinity. 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. The problem. In this note we address the following question. Consider p m n M λ m λ0 n (1) Λ (C ⊗ C ) = S C ⊗ S C λ as a GLm × GLn-module. [. ] I would like any information on the shapes of pairs of Young diagrams (λ, λ0) that give the largest contribution to the dimension asymptotically. [. ] Joseph M. Landsberg [Lan12]1 Above, SλCm denotes the Schur functor applied to Cm or, in other words, arXiv:1705.07604v2 [math.CO] 7 Aug 2017 the irreducible representation of the general linear group GLm with the highest weight λ. The sum in (1) runs over Young diagrams λ ⊆ nm with p boxes, and such that the number of rows of λ is bounded from above by m, and the number of columns of λ is bounded from above by n.
    [Show full text]
  • SOME GENERALIZATIONS of SCHUR FUNCTORS 1. Introduction
    SOME GENERALIZATIONS OF SCHUR FUNCTORS STEVEN V SAM AND ANDREW SNOWDEN Abstract. The theory of Schur functors provides a powerful and elegant approach to the representation theory of GLn—at least to the so-called polynomial representations— especially to questions about how the theory varies with n. We develop parallel theories that apply to other classical groups and to non-polynomial representations of GLn. These theories can also be viewed as linear analogs of the theory of FI-modules. 1. Introduction The theory of Schur functors is a major achievement of representation theory. One can use these functors to construct the irreducible representations of GLn—at least those whose highest weight is positive (the so-called “polynomial” representations). This point of view is important because it gives a clear picture of how the irreducible representation of GLn with highest weight λ varies with n, which is crucial to understand when studying problems in which n varies. Unfortunately, this theory only applies to GLn and not other classical groups, and, as mentioned, only to the polynomial representations of GLn. The purpose of this paper is to develop parallel theories that apply in other cases. To explain our results, we focus on the orthogonal case. Let C = CO be the category whose objects are finite dimensional complex vector spaces equipped with non-degenerate symmetric bilinear forms and whose morphisms are linear isometries. An orthogonal Schur functor is a functor from C to the category of vector spaces that is algebraic, in an appro- priate sense. We denote the category of such functors by A = AO.
    [Show full text]
  • Stability of Schur Functors*
    JOURNAL OF ALGEBRA 195, 233]240Ž. 1997 ARTICLE NO. JA977049 Stability of Schur Functors* Alexandre I. Kabanov² Department of Mathematics, Michigan State Uni¨ersity, Wells Hall, East Lansing, Michigan 48824-1027 View metadata, citation and similar papersCommunicated at core.ac.uk by Peter Littelmann brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Received September 5, 1996 SymplecticŽ. resp. orthogonal Schur functors are defined on a vector space V with a non-degenerate skew-symmetricŽ. resp. symmetric bilinear form. Each of these functors determines an irreducible representation of spŽ.ŽV resp. so Ž..V . We prove that if dim V is sufficiently large, then the splitting into irreducible components of the composition of a symplecticŽ. orthogonal Schur functor and an ordinary Schur functor applied to V is independent of dim V. We also prove the stability of the branching for the symplecticŽ. orthogonal Schur functors. Q 1997 Academic Press INTRODUCTION Con¨ention. All vector spaces, Lie algebras, and their representations Ž are considered over the complex numbers. Given a partition l s l1 G . l2 G ??? G lk ) 0 we say that k is the length of l, and we denote it by dlŽ. Ýk l l <<l . We call is1 i the weight of , and we denote it by . We also say that l is a partition of <<l Žcf.wx 3, I.1. Each partition l determines a Schur functor Sl which associates to a vector space V an irreducible slŽ.V -module SlV, and each irreducible representation of slŽ.V can be obtained in this way.
    [Show full text]