DOCSLIB.ORG

Putting the Philosophy Into Phd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Putting the Philosophy Into Phd Putting the philosophy into PhD Adele Baldwin Introduction ing increasingly blurred as the award the argument that over recent years, Novice researchers undertaking a structures change over time. the differences between the two ap- PhD are exposed to different research proaches to doctoral study have be- methodologies, methods, and relat- A Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) award come more vague with a number of ed philosophies. The emphasis is on is generally considered to be one of PhD graduates working in their cho- developing knowledge and skills as the highest academic qualifications sen field of practice (Pearson, 2005), they progress through the research available (Johnson, 2001; Bourner and those with professional doctor- process. Doctoral studies are usually et al., 2010). In academic terms, a ate establishing careers in academia. considered research training, or an PhD is considered to be higher de- These authors highlight the similari- ‘apprenticeship’ in research. With gree research training and signals the ties between doctoral programs and the emphasis on investigative pro- beginning of a research career. The relate the phenomena to the contin- cesses, the place of philosophy in the alternative professional doctorate uing development of the professions. Doctor of Philosophy can be over- includes a smaller research element Ultimately, the inclusion of the word shadowed. This paper will discuss supported by coursework compo- ‘philosophy’ in the title of PhD, im- the role of philosophy in the Doctor nents. A traditional PhD requires the plies a greater emphasis on this con- of Philosophy, why this important candidate, under the guidance of a cept. Given the intent of the discus- consideration challenges the candi- supervisory team, to complete a sig- sion that follows, this paper focuses date and, through personal reflec- nificant piece of individual research, on the relationship between philoso- tion, provides reassurance for those which upon completion is approved phy and the traditional PhD. beginning their doctoral journey. by an expert panel including external examiners (Maxwell, 2011). Despite In spite of the reference to philosophy What is a PhD? the differences between the profes- in the title of the PhD, there is little In some countries, in the disciplines sional doctorate and the PhD, some discussion in the literature about the of medicine, veterinary science and similarity exists between the two in relationship between philosophy and dentistry, the title of ‘doctor’ is hon- the way that the student inevitably is the study of research at this level. It orary and may be adopted upon required to undertake some personal would be reasonable to assume that completion. Formally, the title is as- philosophical searching. The degree a considerable part of the PhD jour- signed to students who complete a to which this is undertaken will be in- ney is dedicated to philosophy and doctoral degree. The term ‘doctoral fluenced by the degree to which re- its incorporation into this significant studies’ incorporates two higher de- search forms the content. That is, un- piece of research. Anecdotally, it is grees that result in the awarding of dertaking higher degree studies with also reasonable to assume that even this title; a Doctor of Philosophy and any element of research will include those embarking on a PhD struggle a professional doctorate. There are some philosophical searching in the with truly understanding the role of traditional views about the differenc- building of a doctoral identity. philosophy in a PhD. es between PhDs and professional doctorates but the lines are becom- Several authors differentiate be- Philosophy in a PhD tween the types of doctoral studies Birks (2014) defines philosophy as “a Author details as being that the PhD prepares the view of the world encompassing the Adele Baldwin future researcher, whereas the pro- questions and mechanisms for find- Lecturer, Principal Academic Adviser fessional doctorate provides the ex- ing answers that inform that view” Nursing, Midwifery and Nutrition perienced professional with research (p.18). This emphasis on questioning College of Healthcare Sciences Division of Tropical Health and capacity (Neumann, 2005; Pearson, is expanded in the definition provid- Medicine 2005; Pearson et al., 2008; Bourner ed by Crossan (2003) as an “uncom- James Cook University et al., 2010; Fenge, 2010). However, plicated and innocent way of ques- Townsville Queensland 4810 Maxwell (2011), Malfroy and Yates tioning which produces confusion Australia (2013) and Edwardson (2010) go fur- and instability in assumptions” (p.47). adele.baldwin@jcu.edu.au ther to challenge this perception with He goes further to say that philoso- Working Papers in the Health Sciences 1:10 Winter 2014 ISSN 2051-6266 / 20150063 1 phy is the most basic level at which sign and the philosophical position- particular research methodology, in- research methods should be consid- ing of the researcher receives limited stead encouraging new links and the ered and that philosophy drives the attention in the literature with few opportunity to interpret research interrogative processes that generate authors addressing it on a level easily through different lenses (Holloway the research questions and inform understood by novice research stu- and Todres, 2003; Burbank and Mar- the research. dents (Crossan, 2003; Mills and Birks, tins, 2009; McCreaddie and Payne, 2014). To prepare a research propos- 2010; Dowling and Cooney, 2012; Hall Philosophy comprises both ontologi- al, the candidate must reflect on who et al., 2013; Mesel, 2013; Mills and cal and epistemological components. they are in the world and what their Birks, 2014). Ontology refers to the individual’s ex- world-view is. Embarking on quali- isting assumptions about reality and tative research can, however, often Learning about and discerning be- how they view the world. Epistemol- raise more questions than answers. tween research designs creates one ogy is how an individual believes that What is my philosophy? Where did it of the first major learning curves for knowledge is gained. Together, ontol- go? How do I find it? How do I know the candidate: choosing a study de- ogy and epistemology describe what what it looks like? Oh, what have I sign that is suitable to address the re- the researcher knows and how they got myself into?! search question and that is consistent gain knowledge (Denzin and Lincoln, with the researcher’s philosophy. Ul- 2011; Howell, 2013). Furthermore, in some cases the timately, the philosophy should come alignment of philosophy to a specif- first (Crossan, 2003). In reality, the As a lens through which we view the ic research design is almost a sacred areas of interest for most researchers world, philosophy allows research- bond and students who inadvertently generally reflect their personal phi- ers to identify knowledge gaps upon disrespect the bond may potentially losophy (regardless of whether this which to base research and the meth- become alienated and disillusioned. is articulated) and thus such align- od with which the gaps are filled (Mills Conversely, students who feel that ment occurs as a natural progression. and Birks, 2014). Thus philosophy they are not following their own Those whose personal philosophy and research are inextricably linked path can foster feelings of not own- leads them to see the world as com- in knowledge generation. A PhD is ing their PhD which can ultimately prised of singular truths for example, basic research training and acknowl- lead to non-completion (Johnson, will seek to prove such truths through edgement of an individual philosophy 2001). Therefore in the interest of the use of the scientific method. Oth- is fundamental to each person’s PhD self-preservation, students tread very ers whose philosophical values and journey. A researcher’s philosophy carefully to avoid invoking the ire of beliefs has them see the world as or the way they view the world will experienced researchers. A negative constructed through interaction are undoubtedly influence the way in experience at this early stage may re- more likely to lean towards qualita- which a study proceeds. Philosophi- inforce the ‘imposter syndrome’ that tive approaches that permit inves- cal questioning informs identification many students feel, turning an excit- tigation from this perspective. The of the research problem and selec- ing learning opportunity into an ardu- lead author’s philosophy, research tion of research method and thus is ous task from start to finish (Maxwell, methodology and process is outlined an essential part of ensuring that the 2011). in Box 1. researcher stays true to their chosen method (Evans, 2013). This covert el- The identification of an individual Box 1 Adele’s PhD ement of research permeates all as- philosophy has the potential to be Adele is a nursing and midwifery aca- pects of the project and may in fact lost in the process of developing a demic with over 25 years experience in be more readily identifiable in its ab- strong research design and result in the profession. Her PhD is: Role mod- sence/lack of acknowledgement than confusion for the student. Knowl- eling by nurse academics: a grounded in its presence. Identifying one’s phil- edge acquisition in the early stages theory study. This reflects her interest osophical position is therefore one of of a PhD includes developing a clear in holistic learning experiences and the the first and most important tasks for understanding of research methods development of nursing students’ pro- the researcher. But, how do you know applicable to the chosen methodolo- fessional identity. Grounded theory is based on the belief what you don’t know? gy. Reading a multitude of texts and that knowledge is generated. Therefore journals opens a whole new world the answer to this research question The student experience of knowledge and ways of thinking. could be best investigated using this We have established that undertaking Traditional texts about research pro- methodology. qualitative research at a doctoral lev- cesses align specific methods with During the early stages of methodolog- el requires the candidate to adopt re- underpinning philosophies.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PEILING CHEN EDUCATION Doctorate of Optometry May 2018
    PEILING CHEN EDUCATION Doctorate of Optometry May 2018 Salus University, Pennsylvania College of Optometry, Elkins Park, PA ​ Bachelors of Science in Biology May 2013 College of Chemical and Life Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD ​ EMPLOYMENT Assistant Faculty of Ophthalmology January 2019- present Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins Medicine ◾ Provide comprehensive eye services specializing in the diagnosis and management of ocular diseases, conditions and post-operative surgical care in areas such as: dry eye, ocular allergy, macular degeneration, retinal pathologies, diabetic retinopathy, hypertensive retinopathy, glaucoma, LASIK care, and cataracts; as well as, eye examinations and contact lens fittings Optometrist August 2018- December 2018 National Vision, Inc. ◾ Provide comprehensive eye exams, contact lense fittings and assistance in the referral and management of glaucoma, diabetes and cataract patients ◾ Treat minor ocular service conditions like blepharitis, ocular allergy and dry eye Optical Principles and Ophthalmic Application Teaching Assistant August 2015-May 2016 Pennsylvania College of Optometry, Elkins Park, PA ◾ Assisted first year optometry students at the Pennsylvania College of Optometry with challenging course topics ◾ Mentored underclassmen on how to succeed in the course based on prior experience Vision Therapist September 2011-2014 Appelbaum Eye Care Associates, Bethesda, MD ◾ Provided assistance on vision therapy exercises to patients with binocular vision and ocular motor dysfunctions ◾ Performed
    [Show full text]
  • AAAA Statement on Clinical Doctorate Degrees
    AAAA Statement on Clinical Doctorate Degrees The American Academy of Anesthesiologist Assistants is dedicated to maintaining the standards of the profession and the specialty by remaining current with the ongoing changes and emerging needs in health care delivery while promoting the safety and upholding the rights of all patients undergoing medical treatment involving an anesthesia provider. A recent proliferation of entry-level clinical doctorate degrees into the educational models of non-physician providers has caused a commensurate increase in the use of the title “doctor” in the healthcare system. Inappropriately, the title "resident" and "doctor" has been used in the clinical setting by students and graduates of these programs despite their non-physician status. This trend is a recognized source of potential confusion for patients concerning their medical care and has potential negative implications with respect to scope of practice infringement and conflict of interest, decreased professional diversity, increased health care costs, and aggravation of provider shortages. The AAAA believes that the practice of medicine remains the domain of physicians and that the entry-level doctorate degree for the practice of medicine is the MD/DO. Physicians are integral members and leaders of the health care team. In the interest of patient safety, Anesthesiologist Assistants practice exclusively in, promote, and are dedicated to the Anesthesia Care Team as defined by the AAAA and ASA. The AAAA is committed to instilling confidence in the public by encouraging practitioners to adhere to established ethical norms and regional legal constraints. Furthermore, we believe in optimizing the use of all provider resources to deliver health care to everyone.
    [Show full text]
  • The Professional Doctorate: What Are We Waiting For?
    FROM THE PA EDITOR-IN-CHIEF The Professional Doctorate: What Are We Waiting for? he increasingly complex health care it matured from the “first-generation” con- system in the United States relies cept (which was quite similar to the PhD in T heavily on quality improvement, in- structure) to “second-generation,” which is terprofessional collaboration, patient out- more focused on discipline and workplace comes, health policy legislation, and advo- realities.3,5 In general, these professional cacy. While important, most of these factors doctorates can be earned in less time are outside the scope of the traditional mas- than a PhD and do not require original ter’s-level education program—necessitat- research. ing the development of methods to help Over the past two decades, more than advanced practice providers, including NPs 500 unique professional practice doc- Randy D. Danielsen, and PAs, obtain additional skills. The solu- torate programs have emerged across PhD, PA, DFAAPA tion of choice, for many professions, has the US, in fields ranging from nursing to been the introduction of the “professional bioethics. One of the most prominent is doctorate” as a complementary alternative the Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP), to the typical research-focused doctoral designed for RNs seeking a post-profes- program, such as the PhD. sional degree in nursing. In 2004, follow- Traditional PhD curricula prepare in- ing three years of research by a task force, dividuals to perform re- the American Associa- search that is typically tion of Colleges of Nursing specialized and confined To be recognized (AACN) endorsed the DNP, to their field of study.1 as a full professional, with the goal that it would While this research does one must be equipped become the minimum produce new knowledge, educational standard for it usually remains in the to address practical advanced practice nurses realm of academia and problems.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Loans on Time to Doctorate Degree: Differences by Race/Ethnicity, Field of Study, and Institutional Characteristics
    Dongbin Kim Cindy Otts The Effect of Loans on Time to Doctorate Degree: Differences by Race/Ethnicity, Field of Study, and Institutional Characteristics Introduction Graduate schools prepare students not only for fu- ture careers in academia, but also for leadership positions in govern- ment, business, non-profit organizations, and other industries. Given the likelihood of doctoral degree recipients being active in research or lead- ership positions, they may have considerable opportunity to influence public policy. In a global, knowledge-driven economy, the need for a highly educated workforce is vital to maintaining the nation’s status and economy. Doctoral-granting institutions, therefore, play an important role in educating academicians and professionals alike who can take the lead in this highly interdependent world. Unfortunately, the nation’s graduate schools fail to fully educate many students who enter doctoral programs because the programs are plagued by high attrition rates. This material is based upon work supported by the Association for Institutional Re- search, the National Center for Education Statistics, the National Science Foundation, and the National Postsecondary Education Cooperative under Association for Institu- tional Research Grant Number 223. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recom- mendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Association for Institutional Research, the National Center for Education Statistics, the National Science Foundation, or the National Postsecondary Education Cooperative. Authors thank the anonymous reviewers for comments and encouragements on ear- lier drafts. Dongbin Kim is an assistant professor in the department of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies at the University of Kansas.
    [Show full text]
  • (2) of Act No. 111/1998 Sb., on Higher Education Institutions and On
    Internal Regulations of the University of West Bohemia In accordance with Article 36 (2) of Act No. 111/1998 Sb., on Higher Education Institutions and on Amendments and Supplements to Other Acts (the Higher Education Act), the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports registered, on 5 June 2017, under Ref. No. MSMT- 16039/2017, Habilitation Procedure and Professor Appointment Procedure Regulations. ………………………………………. Mgr. Karolína Gondková Director of the Higher Education Department HABILITATION PROCEDURE AND PROFESSOR APPOINTMENT PROCEDURE REGULATIONS Dated 5 June 2017 [Note: Habilitation is a Czech academic procedure whereby a person is awarded the academic rank of Docent, which is usually considered equivalent to Associate Professor.] PART ONE General Provisions Article 1 General Provisions (1) This Internal Regulation formulates rules for the habilitation and professor appointment procedures at the University of West Bohemia (hereinafter referred to as "UWB"). (2) Provisions concerning the relevant Scientific Board shall also apply to the Artistic Board, where established. (3) UWB, or a relevant Faculty, shall publish these Habilitation Procedure and Professor Appointment Procedure Regulations in accordance with Act No. 111/1998 Sb., on Higher Education Institutions and on Amendments and Supplements to Other Acts (the Higher Education Act), as amended, (hereinafter referred to as the "Act"). The public may read a habilitation thesis before its defence at the Dean's office of the relevant Faculty, or at the Research and Development Division, if a habilitation procedure is conducted by UWB. Article 2 Authorisation to Conduct a Habilitation Procedure or Professor Appointment Procedure (1) A habilitation procedure or professor appointment procedure shall be conducted in accordance with the Act in fields for which UWB, or a Faculty, has received accreditation.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Granting Docent Status
    UPPSALA UNIVERSITY GUIDELINES 11 June 2015 JURFAK 2015/49 Appendix 1 UPPSALA UNIVERSITY DECISION Board of the Faculty of Law 17 October 2013 (revised on 11 June 2015) Guidelines for granting docent status 1. Purpose of appointing docents at the Faculty of Law The purpose of granting the title or position of ‘docent’1 at the Faculty of Law is to clearly recognise a person’s special academic expertise. Docent status may be conferred if it may be beneficial to the research and education. A docent is required to be active in education at postgraduate (research) level in various ways, such as providing proficient supervision and undertaking the role of ‘opponent’ in disputations (public defences of PhD theses). Obtaining docent status therefore presupposes academic qualifications over and above a doctoral degree. Docent status may normally be conferred only in a subject in which education at postgraduate level is provided at the Faculty. A person who has gained docent status at another higher education institution may not be granted docent status in the same subject at the Faculty of Law in Uppsala. 2. Consultation A person wishing to be granted docent status is recommended first to raise the matter informally with the Chair of the Research Committee. The Chair must then consult one or more subject representatives on the matter. Advice not to continue does not constitute any formal impediment to proceeding with the application. 3. Conferral requirements for applicants lacking positions at the Faculty of Law If applicants have no permanent or time-limited appointment at the Faculty of Law, subject representatives must issue special statements of opinion regarding the manner in which the grant of docent status could benefit research and education at the Faculty.
    [Show full text]
  • Doctor of Philosophy in Pharmacy
    collegE OF PHARmacy Doctor of Philosophy in Pharmacy HEALTH PROFESSIONS DIVISION • ENTERINg Class 20142015 NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY Nova Southeastern University, synonymous with dynamic innovation and intellectual challenge, is the largest independent not-for-profit university in the Southeast, and with an enrollment of nearly 26,000 students, is the ninth largest in the United States. Situated on a beautiful, 314-acre campus in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, the university is experiencing a sustained period of academic growth, fiscal strength, and commitment to the challenges of the 21st century. In this environment of expansion and stability, the university is capitalizing on its strengths in such areas as academic innovation, comprehensive clinical training, and flexible educational delivery systems. Founded in 1964 as Nova University, the institution merged with Southeastern University of the Health Sciences in 1994, creating Nova Southeastern University. To date, the institution has more than 162,000 alumni. Fully accredited by the Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools, the university awards associate’s, bachelor’s, master’s, educational specialist, and doctoral degrees in a wide range of fields including the health professions, law, business, marine sciences, psychology, social sciences, computer and information sciences, and education. The university’s degree programs are administered through 16 academic centers that offer courses at the main campus and at field-based locations throughout Florida; across the nation; and at selected international sites in Europe, mexico, the Pacific Rim, Central and South America, and the Caribbean. With a budget of more than $220 million per year and an upward trend in enrollment, the university will continue to maintain a solid record of academic and fiscal strength and excellence in teaching and community service, while expanding its mission in research and scholarship.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Completion of Degree
    General Procedures for Completing a Doctor of Philosophy Degree School of Medicine Graduate Studies Program This section describes the procedures and documentation needed to receive a Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) degree in the OHSU School of Medicine. Students and mentors should note relevant deadlines. Please refer to your individual program guide for additional requirements. Forms referenced in this document and specific policies can be accessed at: http://www.ohsu.edu/xd/education/schools/school-of-medicine/academic-programs/graduate- studies/admin-resources.cfm 1. Complete Program Requirements A minimum of 135 approved graduate credits are required. All program requirements must be completed including coursework, advancement to candidacy, research credits, and any additional requirements. Progress towards completing course requirements can be checked in DegreeWorks. All coursework applied towards degree requirements must meet the minimum cumulative grade point average of at least 3.0. 2. Apply for Degree The Office of the Registrar requires an Application for Degree be submitted one term prior to completing degree requirements. This can be submitted online by logging into the Student Information System (SIS). 3. Request for Oral Examination Students may not take the oral examination if they are on academic probation or if an Incomplete (I) grade remains on their transcript. The oral examination must be held at OHSU, shall be open to the public, and advertised. A signed Request for Oral Examination form must be submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies at least 4 weeks before the scheduled oral defense date. Students must be registered for at least 1 dissertation credit during the term in which the Oral Examination occurs.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulations for Doctoral Degree Studies in the Faculty of Medicine at the Rhenish Friedrich- Wilhelm University of Bonn As of Se
    Regulations for Doctoral Degree Studies in the Faculty of Medicine at the Rhenish Friedrich- Wilhelm University of Bonn As of September 2nd 2014 In accordance with §§ 2 section 4 and 64 section 1 of the Universities Act of the Federal State of North-Rhine Westphalia (Hochschulgesetz - HG) in the version of the Higher Education Autonomy Act (Hochschulfreiheitsgesetz - HfG) of 31 October 2006 (gazette of laws and ordinances, GV. NRW p. 474), last modified by Article 1 of the Act Introducing an Age Limit for the Tenure of University Lecturers of 3 December 2013 (GV NRW p. 273), the Faculty of Medicine at the Rhenish Friedrich- Wilhelm University of Bonn has enacted the following examination regulations: Table of contents I. General § 1 Doctoral Studies § 2 Doctoral Examination Board § 3 Doctoral Committee II. Qualification phase § 4 Content and scope of the qualification phase § 5 Admission § 6 The Dissertation III. Examination phase § 7 Commencing the doctoral examination procedure § 8 Assessment of the dissertation § 9 Oral examination (Promotionskolloquium and Disputation) § 10 Grading § 11 Publication of the dissertation § 12 Doctoral certificate § 13 Annulment and withdrawal § 14 Access to examination records IV. Joint PhD or MD/PhD § 15 Special provisions for the examination of a PhD jointly supervised by a foreign university V. Final provision §16 Entry into force and publication Appendix I. General §1 Doctoral Studies (1) The Faculty of Medicine at the Rhenish Friedrich-Wilhelm University of Bonn awards the academic degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) or of Medical Doctor/ Doctor of Philosophy (MD/PhD) upon completion of the doctoral examination procedures in accordance with the appendix and in accordance with these regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cambridge Bachelor of Medicine (MB)/Doctor of Philosophy (Phd): Graduate Outcomes of the First MB/Phd Programme in the UK
    ■ MEDICAL EDUCATION Clinical Medicine 2012, Vol 12, No 6: 530–534 The Cambridge Bachelor of Medicine (MB)/Doctor of Philosophy (PhD): graduate outcomes of the first MB/PhD programme in the UK Timothy M Cox, James Brimicombe, Diana F Wood and D Keith Peters ABSTRACT – We reviewed outcomes of the Cambridge Bachelor training posts, are challenges for clinical academics – these issues of Medicine (MB)/Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) programme for particularly affect procedural specialties, including surgery. the period 1989–2010. Of the 90 alumni contacted, 80 (89%; Doctor of Medicine (MD)/Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) pro- 24 women) completed an anonymous questionnaire. Thirty grammes have long been established in North American medical were academic staff and 35 were in general professional (core) schools to enhance recruitment to academic medicine.1 These or higher medical training. Of the latter, 11 were specialty reg- programmes focus on clinical investigation, especially transla- istrars, six were academic clinical fellows and three held aca- tional research, which is perceived as a requirement for innova- demic foundation year posts. Eight alumni were overseas, tion in medical practice. The medical scientist training pro- including five in North America. Most (95%) respondents con- gramme (MSTP) in the largest public university in the USA, the sidered that their academic career goals were facilitated by the David Gethin School of Medicine, University of California programme. Sixty-eight of the 80 alumni had conducted fur- (UCLA), has 150 graduates, 70 of whom are academic physician ther research, 63 (79%) were active in research, and 90% had scientists. Comparable educational investment has been called explicit plans for further full-time research.
    [Show full text]
  • Doctor of Philosophy in Engineering (Ph.D.) 1
    Doctor of Philosophy in Engineering (Ph.D.) 1 DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN Career Opportunities • Research Engineer ENGINEERING (PH.D.) • Professional in advanced fields of engineering Purpose The purpose of the Doctor of Philosophy in Engineering program is to Train Champions for Christ in Engineering, Scholarship and Research. Program Learning Outcomes The student will be able to: • Integrate qualitative and quantitative tools to perform effective engineering analysis and research. • Synthesize complex disparate information into new, valued scholarly contributions that reflect knowledge of the literature of the disciplines. • Communicate scholarly contributions in the written context. • Communicate scholarly contributions in the oral context. • Integrate the Christian worldview in all engineering design and management decisions. Program Specific Admissions Requirements In addition to the general admission requirements, admission to candidacy in the Ph.D. in Engineering program requires: 1. Earned Master’s degree in Engineering or any other STEM field from an institution accredited by an agency recognized by the U.S. Department of Education (e.g., SACSCOC, TRACS, ABHE, etc.). 2. A graduate cumulative GPA of 3.0 or above (on a 4.00 scale). 3. TOEFL (if applicable). Transfer Credit Students may transfer up to 42 credit hours from an accredited institution subject to department approval. A maximum of 30 hours of 500/600-level coursework may be applied to the degree, whether credit taken for the Ph.D. through Liberty, credit from a Master’s degree completed through Liberty, or credit transferred from another institution. In order to transfer credit, students must have earned the minimum grade of B-, and courses must have been completed within seven (7) years of the start date of the program.
    [Show full text]
  • Modernizing the Scope of Practice of Optometry Will Improve Access to Needed Eye and Vision Health Care for All Maryland Citizens
    P.O. Box 350, Stevenson, MD 21153 ! T: (410) 486-9662 ! F: (443) 378-8845 ! www.marylandoptometry.org Modernizing the scope of practice of optometry will improve access to needed eye and vision health care for all Maryland citizens. It will ensure patients receive the best quality of care available, improve overall patient health outcomes and lower health care costs for both patients and insurers alike. SUMMARY OF SCOPE EXPANSION OBJECTIVES By removing outdated prohibitions in current statute, the bill seeks to better serve optometric patients by allowing Maryland optometrists to: • Prescribe all FDA Approved Therapeutic and Diagnostic Agents (e.g., oral and topical drugs, vitamins, and other therapies) • Independently Treat Glaucoma (development of patient treatment plan & delivery of pre/post operative care) • Perform In-office Diagnostic Testing (e.g., genetic testing via cheek swab and blood glucose testing for diabetes) • Order Diagnostic Tests (e.g., blood work, MRI, x-ray, sonogram, other lab work related to diseases of the eye and ocular system) • Remove Foreign Bodies “STATE OF THE STATE” SCOPE OF PRACTICE FACTS • Doctors of optometry order diagnostic tests in 45 states • Doctors of optometry prescribe controlled substances in 44 • Doctors of optometry to use oral drugs to treat Glaucoma in 42 states • Doctors of optometry prescribe anti-fungal oral medications in 41 states EDUCATION & TRAINING Optometrists receive a minimum of eight 8 years of education and training to obtain the required undergraduate and doctorate degrees necessary to practice optometry. All optometrists are required to pass a three part comprehensive national exam administered by the National Board of Examiners in Optometry prior to receiving their doctorate degree.
    [Show full text]