Knowledge Society and the Flat World of Thomas L. Friedman

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Knowledge Society and the Flat World of Thomas L. Friedman 20 Revista Informatica Economică nr. 1(45)/2008 Knowledge Society and the flat World of Thomas L. Friedman Dana Ramona ANDRIŞESCU Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, “Al.I.Cuza” University, Iaşi [email protected] The traditional society became lately the knowledge society. As the name states, know- ledge is the most important asset of our times. There are different opinions on knowledge so- ciety and on globalization, but we will deal in this paper with Thomas Friedman’s flat world. The world got smaller with the developments in information and communication technology. Globalization has three periods and ten flatteners widely described by Friedman in his book. Technology changes the way we communicate, collaborate and share our knowledge. Keywords: knowledge society, information technology, globalization, flattener. ntroduction tion, it is above them, it becomes economic I“The World is Flat” is a new vision on in- asset. This asset led to knowledge society. formation and communication technology’s Yi-chen Lan mentions Peter Druker which capabilities from the information and know- saw the transformations that took place in so- ledge dissemination point of view. The first ciety. The later said that the main resource in edition appeared in 2005 edited by Farrar, a society is knowledge. The industries made Straus and Giroux, fallowed by two others the transition from goods producing and dis- the next years. Even though there are lots of semination to information and knowledge. writings about the information technology, Knowledge becomes an important resource Thomas L. Friedman brings something dif- and instrument of innovation that gives its ferent with the writing style and the examples owner competitive advantages. As Yi-chen given at all the subjects treated in his book. Lan states, knowledge is a set of rules, laws Beside the computer science parts the author and systems that communicate through ma- contributes with his personal experience on nipulation and information processing. Bryan globalization. He focuses on this subject and Bergeron2 defines knowledge as „informa- relies on economics, computer science, social tion that is organized, synthesized, or sum- life. We will try next to bring forward some marized to enhance comprehension, aware- information on knowledge society and we ness, or understanding. That is, knowledge is will focus especially on Friedman’s globali- a combination of metadata and an awareness zation and the flatteners. of the context in which the metadata can be applied successfully”. Knowledge society Joel Mokyr3 states that knowledge is actually It would be a very big mistake to confound what the person thinks that it is true. In our the term information with that of knowledge. opinion knowledge is information processed Knowledge1 is related to people and cannot by our brain and used as know-how for dif- be reduced to a set of “0” and “1”, the way ferent purposes. information is represented. It has an “institu- Knowledge society’s origins (or knowledge tionalized” dimension: it is recognized by a community and is related to other know- ledge, uses and certain applications. In the in- formation society, it plays a main role. Even though it does not have the same characteris- 2 Bergeron, B., Essentials of Knowledge Management tics in the terms of processing and dissemina- ,John Wiley & Sons, U.S.A., 2003, p. 10 3 Mokyr, J., The Knowledge Society: Theoretical and Historical Underpinnings from The Gifts of Athena: 1 Weert, T., Education and Knowledge Society, Historical Origins of the Knowledge Economy, Kluwer Academic Publisher, Geneva, 2004, p. 28 Princeton University Press, 2002 Revista Informatica Economică nr. 1(45)/2008 21 based society) 4 can be traced in papers writ- meanings for each individual according to his ten around 1960 by Fritz Machlup and Peter activity domain globalization has many defi- Druker. First proposed the term of know- nitions. In one way will be defined by the ledge industries (1962), the second know- sociology and in another by the economist. ledge work and knowledge worker (1969). But, we can explain it in general, without re- The skepticism for the knowledge society ferring to a certain field. Therefore, globali- concept has at its base the idea that the hu- zation is defined as global integration of eco- man society has always been based on know- nomical, political, religious and social sys- ledge and the new brought in contemporary tems. Globalization is also about the disap- society of today refers only to the electronic pearance of the borders for knowledge dis- communication and information processing semination. This is why knowledge society support. A differentiation between informa- becomes global, thanks to the information tion society and knowledge society must be and communication technology. made. While information society is in tech- “The global playground is flattening” said nologies developments and strategies for Thomas L. Friedman. After a laborious do- their implementation, knowledge society5 is a cumentation and interviews with the most society that creates, shares and uses know- important people of today, he has published ledge for people’s prosperity and welfare. “The World is Flat”, a daring history of the The main factor for knowledge society’s de- 21st century. Declared one of the best opinion velopment is innovation market demand and leaders of The United States, he deciphers lifelong learning, which require continuous the secrets and lights up the mechanisms of improvement working conditions, productivi- technology, business and politics of this new ty and efficiency. Knowledge society uses world. When we take a look at the title of problem solving instruments. We can men- the book our mind goes back into history and tion here high speed computers, networks, in- not in the present. But for saying this, Fried- formation acquisition and so on. Develop- man has his arguments in the field of tech- ment of this society requires continuous nology. The developments that took place in knowledge discovery, assimilation and or- the last decades, interconnect the world, and ganization. Knowledge society6 implies a involve us in the globalization process. new economy, in which innovation process Friedman’s flattening is at the level of infor- (assimilation and new knowledge conversion mation and knowledge sharing. for creating new goods and services) is the core. It has a global character and therefore The World is Flat has a main part in globalization process. In- After Thomas L. Friedman, the author of the formation revolution and era, in which we book „The World is Flat” globalization has are, are defined by economical, social and three eras: political globalization. While the “globaliza- 1.Globalization 1.0. began with the discovery tion” term is widely spread and used, there of the new world in 1492 by Columbus and are different definitions and understandings lasted until around 1800. The author states of this phenomenon. Because it has different that this era made the world smaller. The flat- teners were the world’s states that tried to in- fluence and dominate the world. This era was 4 Filip, G.F., Dragomirescu, H., in Roşca, I.G., sustained by the use of natural resources such Knowledge Society, Economy Publisher, Bucharest, as wind and horse power. 2006, pp. 18,19 2.Globalization 2.0. between 1800 and 2000, 5 Digital Strategy, Glossary of Key Terms , period in which the world got smaller. It was http://www.digitalstrategy.govt.nz/templates/Page___ _60.aspx the birth of multinational companies that be- 6 Drăgănescu, M., Information and Knowledge Socie- came global in search of new markets, work ty. Vectors in knowledge Society in Filip, F.G. (coor- force and natural resources. This era has been dinator), Information Society. Knowledge Society, Ex- influenced by steam motors, railway, auto- pert Publisher, Bucharest, 2001, p. 45 22 Revista Informatica Economică nr. 1(45)/2008 mobile, telephone, computer, telecommuni- world becomes flat for him. He can have cation, interconnecting the whole world. meetings with his partners, clients, suppliers 3.Globalization 3.0. began with the 21st cen- in real time without being at the same place. tury. It’s a new era, the world became very In one of his interviews, which can be watch- small. While the first two globalization ed online on New York Times site8, newspa- waves were influenced by the countries and per for which Friedman is writing, he states multinational companies, the present wave is that the main technologies that led to globali- led by the individuals that globalize. The zation are the personal computer, Internet dominant factor is software and the Internet. and software revolution. The flattening of the These tools, allow individuals, ordinary world is taking place because of the platform people, to connect directly amongst them and created by people, for people, for education, share information and knowledge between communication, interconnecting, in few them, in communities too, just by one mouse words, a real technological revolution. click. The technology connecting platform allows The new wave of globalization coincides people to communicate, collaborate, and es- with the transformation of world’s economy pecially innovate. Therefore, they have the into knowledge economy or knowledge ability of knowledge sharing, acquisition and based economy. In comparison with the old use for any type of activity. The flattening of economy, with activities for resource the world, as Friedman states, took longer processing, knowledge economy processes than world’s creation by God in six days, 10 technology and information. For some tech- “major political events, innovations, and nological fields, it took place a real know- companies” contributed to this process. Same ledge explosion. Modern technology (the time with the beginning of the flattening, we present one) motivates the individual more entered in a new stage of human’s history; than before. If he wants, he can access very we are witnesses of the digitisation, virtuali- easy and fast information, knowledge.
Recommended publications
  • Economic Development: a Case for Visionary Leadership by Paul Weisenfeld
    Economic Development: A Case for Visionary Leadership by Paul Weisenfeld Paul Weisenfeld is mission director at the U.S. Agency for International Development in Zimbabwe. The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of USAID. ince 9/11/01, efforts to identify the causes of persistent poverty and despair in the developing world have expanded, largely focused on Scultural factors, especially in Middle Eastern cultures. There is no question that cultural attitudes and practices have an impact on economic development. Culture, however, does not evolve in isolation. It is only one of many factors that impede economic growth. Geography, environment, and history influence the evolution of culture and have served as significant obstacles to growth in low-income countries. The failure to recognize these other factors leads us to underestimate the enormity of the challenges facing poor countries and, consequently, to devise prescriptions for overcoming poverty that are unrealistic and unlikely to succeed. Prior to the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, life for most Europeans and Americans who were not born into the landed elite was similar to that of the poor in the developing world today: nasty, brutish, and short. This was before the unprecedented creation of wealth brought about by democratic capitalism. In fact, Europe was the technological, cultural, and economic backwater of Eurasia for most of history, importing virtually all of its ideas and technologies from the Middle East and Asia. Europe’s distinctive geography and history allowed for an era of increasing innovation between the fifteenth and eighteenth centuries, creating the conditions that ultimately transformed European culture and its American spin-off into the vibrant cultural and economic powerhouses of today.
    [Show full text]
  • Acting Locally in a Flat World: Global Citizenship and the Democratic Practice of Service-Learning Richard M
    © Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, Volume 13, Number 2, p. 89, (2009) Acting Locally in a Flat World: Global Citizenship and the Democratic Practice of Service-Learning Richard M. Battistoni, Nicholas V. Longo, Stephanie Raill Jayanandhan Abstract This article suggests ways to frame the democratic practice of service-learning in the context of a global society, and reports on emerging efforts at three universities to act globally through local community engagement. The article concludes with prac- tical lessons for promoting global citizenship through service- learning in higher education. Democracy must begin at home, and its home is the neigh- borly community. —John Dewey, The Public and Its Problems The world is being flattened. I didn’t start it and you can’t stop it, except at a great cost to human development and your own future. —Thomas Friedman, The World Is Flat Introduction uilding on the ideas of John Dewey, service-learning has always sought to embed educational experiences within local contexts, relationships, and community institutions. BBut this education is taking place in an increasingly interconnected, global world, which has an impact on every aspect of community life. The “flattened world,” as Thomas Friedman has popularly termed the rise of globalization, has important implications for educators who aim to implement Dewey’s vision of building demo- cratic, neighborly communities. To continue to be relevant, service-learning needs to respond to the new realities of student and community life in
    [Show full text]
  • In a Flatter World Characterized by Rugged and Diverse Terrain, The
    JULY 2012 THE GLOBAL NETWORK FOR ADVANCED MANAGEMENT Motivation: In a flatter world characterized by rugged and diverse terrain, the Global Network for Advanced Management is an innovative approach to enable those involved – faculty at business schools around the world, enterprises in all sectors, and students at various stages of professional development – to connect and address the leadership challenges facing business and society. Enterprises in all sectors need leaders who understand how markets and organizations work in increasingly diverse and complex contexts. Leadership teams must understand and contribute to the big issues facing societies around the world as well as be able to work effectively in and across regions and sectors, to adapt to the different roles of governments in economies, to master increasingly complicated financial arrangements, and to draw upon ever-closer connections in the modern world. Other important considerations for leaders include an appreciation of a broad range of diversity issues, e.g., the highly variable roles of women in business, and divergent approaches to the environment and education. Leaders also must attend to fundamental questions about enterprise objectives and effective means of aligning incentives and motivating sustained effort in these extraordinarily challenging and exciting times. The development of the Global Network for Advanced Management is a vital response to this diverse landscape as well as to limitations in the ways that business schools and other academic institutions are organized. As Thomas Friedman explained in compelling fashion,1 the world has flattened over the last three decades, as over three billion people have joined the world’s market- oriented economy and businesses have become more global, in large part due to technological advances.
    [Show full text]
  • The World Is Flat: a Brief History of the Twenty First Century
    THE WORLD IS FLAT: A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE TWENTY FIRST CENTURY By Thomas L. Friedman. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2005. 488pp Thomas Friedman has won the Pulitzer Prize three times for his work at the New York Times, where he writes a regular syndicated column. He is also the author of numerous books, including the popular 1999 book on globalization, “The Lexus and the Olive Tree.” Friedman’s premise is that computing and telecommunications technologies have done more than speed up the world—they have transformed the nature of commerce and society. This transformation has huge implications for business, geopolitics, and individual survival in a world that now operates by a new set of rules. I no longer compete only with those in my industry who are located nearby. A large company can lose out to a small company a world away. An individual in Indiana can lose a job to an individual in India or South Africa. No government, business, or individual is immune to these forces, so we had better understand them. Numerous examples of companies operating around the world were sited. In one section he recounts an order placed for a Dell laptop computer. Each part of the computer is listed below and it’s country of origin: Dell Inspiron 600m Notebook: Part/Function Mfg/Assembly Online order to Penang Malaysia Assembly Penang Malaysia Intel processor Philippines. Costa Rica, Malaysia or China Memory Korea (Samsung) Taiwan (Nanya) Germany (Infineon) Japan (Elpida) Graphics Card China (MSI or Foxconn) Cooling Fan Taiwan (CCI or Auras) Motherboard
    [Show full text]
  • “Anti- Globalization” Movement Jeff Rey M
    Framing Collective Action Against Neoliberalism: The Case of the “Anti- Globalization” Movement Jeff rey M. Ayres INTRODUCTION he rise of the so-called “anti-globalization movement” represents one of Tthe most signifi cant illustrations of social confl ict and contentious political behavior of the past several decades. Th e numerous boisterous and well-attended protest events against neoliberal globalization at the turn of the century, more- over, seemed to provide evidence of the rise of an incipient transnational move- ment, as from Seattle, to Chiang Mai, to Prague, to Quebec City and fi nally Genoa, domestic and internationally-represented protests developed solidarities, stirred public debate and attracted larger crowds committed to challenging neo- liberal policies and institutions. Th e transnational character of this movement attracted particular attention, and its emergence coincided with a remarkable and increasingly well-documented upsurge in transnational civic activity around a host of global issues (Smith, Pagnucco and Chatfi eld 1997, Della Porta, Kriesi and Rucht 1999; Tarrow 2001; Khagram, Riker and Sikkink 2002; Smith and Johnston 2002), while sparking a mini-publishing industry of “how-to” manuals for budding street activists (Danaher and Burbach 2000; Welton and Wolf 2001; Prokosch and Raymond 2002). One means of understanding the recent trajectory of this protest movement is to appreciate that its dynamics have been shaped by an underlying and quite ferocious contest over people’s interpretations and understandings of the sup- abstract posed benefi ts of neoliberal economic policies. How people interpret and frame Th e rise of the protest movement against fi cult time generating agreed upon strategic neoliberal globalization represents one of the responses to neoliberal policies.
    [Show full text]
  • The World Is Flat by Thomas L
    The World Is Flat by Thomas L. Friedman - MonkeyNotes by PinkMonkey.com For the complete study guide: http://monkeynote.stores.yahoo.net/ PinkMonkey® Literature Notes on . http://monkeynote.stores.yahoo.net/ Sample MonkeyNotes Note: this sample contains only excerpts and does not represent the full contents of the booknote. This will give you an idea of the format and content. The World Is Flat A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century by Thomas L. Friedman 2005 MonkeyNotes Study Guide by Laurie Lahey http://monkeynote.stores.yahoo.net/ Reprinted with permission from TheBestNotes.com Copyright © 2007, All Rights Reserved Distribution without the written consent of TheBestNotes.com is strictly prohibited. 1 PinkMonkey.com/TheBestNotes.com. Copyright © 2007, All Rights Reserved. No further distribution without written consent. http://monkeynote.stores.yahoo.net/ The World Is Flat by Thomas L. Friedman - MonkeyNotes by PinkMonkey.com For the complete study guide: http://monkeynote.stores.yahoo.net/ KEY FIGURES Nandan Nilekani – CEO of Infosys Technologies Limited, “one of the jewels of the Indian information technology world.” Friedman describes Nilekani as “one of the most thoughtful and respected captains of Indian industry.” Ann – Friedman’s wife. Ann is a first-grade teacher and Friedman’s confidant throughout the text. Orly and Natalie – Friedman’s daughters, whom he references throughout the text. David Ricardo – is the Ricardo to whom Friedman refers in the subtitle of Chapter 5, “Is Ricardo Still Right?.” Ricardo (1772-1823) “was an English economist who developed the free-trade theory of comparative advantage, which stipulates that if each nation specializes in the production of goods in which it has a comparative cost advantage and then trades with other nations for the goods in which they specialize, there will be an overall gain in trade, and overall income levels should rise in each trading country.” G.
    [Show full text]
  • Mariel John 21F.098
    Mariel John 21F.098 - Paper Topic #1 Globalization The future effects of globalization are widely debated. Will globalization end economic, political and cultural differences throughout the world? Or will it only serve to widen and exacerbate these differences? Or are both too hasty a conclusion? I believe that globalization does have the potential to end longstanding national differences, but I believe it is happening at a slower pace than it may appear on the surface. I also believe that for globalization to be ultimately successful in this endeavor, there are many challenges that must be overcome. By examining both sides of this issue, I will illustrate what globalization has seemed to accomplish and what problems are being faced. In his book “The World Is Flat”, Thomas Friedman paints a very rosy picture of the effects and extent of globalization in the world. While visiting Bangalore, India, he sees Indians taking on jobs that would traditionally have been held by people in western nations. He notes that Bangalore looks and feels like a western city and is a Silicon Valley within India. Due to advances in technology and communications, Friedman asserts that anything that can be done on a computer or over the phone, can be done just as well from Bangalore as it can from somewhere in America. He notes that the economic changes that had taken place in that Indian city were not the only alterations being made. As part of their efforts to succeed in the global market place, many Indians took on American sounding nicknames and many took lessons to learn to neutralize their Indian accent.
    [Show full text]
  • GLOBALIZATION AS Mcworld
    5 GLOBALIZATION AS McWORLD Who invented globalization? The way you answer this question de- pends on how you think about globalization. If you think of globaliza- tion literally you might answer ‘‘Christopher Columbus’’ or someone else from the great era of (European) discovery. If you want to know who ‘‘invented’’ the world as a single geographic unit, all connected to the European center, there are several names you might give, but Co- lumbus is as good as any of them. If you think of globalization as the idea of an economic process that unites and transforms the world, creating a single global system, the inventors’ names are Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. They said it all in The Communist Manifesto, first published in that great year of revolu- tions, 1848. The bourgeoisie, Marx and Engels wrote, has through its exploitation of the world market given a cosmopolitan character to production and consumption in every country. In place of the old wants, satisfied by the productions of the country, we find new wants, requiring for their satisfaction the products of distant lands and climes. In place of the old local and national seclusion and self- sufficiency, we have intercourse in every direction, universal interde- 121 ................. 11092$ $CH5 11-02-04 13:02:33 PS PAGE 121 GLOBALONEY pendence of nations. And as in material, so also in intellectual produc- tion. The intellectual creations of individual nations become common property. National one-sidedness and narrow-mindedness become more and more impossible, and from the numerous national and local literatures, there arises a world literature.1 Marx and Engels were writing about capitalism, of course, but they were really describing globalization in this passage.
    [Show full text]
  • Friedman's Follies: Insights on the Globalization/Regionalization Debate
    Friedman’s Follies: Insights on the Globalization/Regionalization Debate Alan Rugman and Chang H. Oh Abstract In this paper we deconstruct the popular book by Thomas Friedman which argues that the world is integrated through the advent of a new form of globalization based on the Internet. We use the logic of international business strategy to demonstrate that Friedman’s examples of world- wide integration are special cases which ignore the empirical realities of multinational enterprises (MNEs). We provide empirical evidence to demonstrate that the world’s largest MNEs do not operate globally, but sell and produce the vast majority of their output within their home region of the triad. We develop a new analytical framework to explain the limited nature of Friedman’s thinking, and we contrast this with the more robust frameworks available in international business. The latter frameworks, which take into account country level and regional level barriers to inte- gration, are better at explaining the activities of MNEs. We conclude that, from the viewpoint of international business strategy, the prescriptive thinking from Friedman is misleading if it is be- lieved that a global strategy is feasible. Instead, MNEs need to develop strategies to accommodate the realities of intra-regional integration and to overcome the liabilities of inter-regional expansion across the triad. KEYWORDS: globalization, regionalization, international business strategy, multinational enter- prises Rugman and Oh: Friedman's Follies Introduction A large academic literature in the international business field suggests that multinational enterprises (MNEs) are the key drivers of globalization (Rugman 1981, 2000; Dunning 1993, 2001). Yet many popular books on globalization fail to recognize the nature, extent and business reality of MNEs as leaders of globalization.
    [Show full text]
  • Globalization and the Flattening of the World: a Book Review of “The World Is Flat”
    The Kabod Volume 5 Issue 1 Fall 2018 Article 3 September 2018 Globalization and the Flattening of the World: A Book Review of “The World is Flat” Shannon L. Wade Liberty University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/kabod Part of the Business Commons Recommended Citations MLA: Wade, Shannon L. "Globalization and the Flattening of the World: A Book Review of “The World is Flat”," The Kabod 5. 1 (2018) Article 3. Liberty University Digital Commons. Web. [xx Month xxxx]. APA: Wade, Shannon L. (2018) "Globalization and the Flattening of the World: A Book Review of “The World is Flat”" The Kabod 5( 1 (2018)), Article 3. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/kabod/vol5/ iss1/3 Turabian: Wade, Shannon L. "Globalization and the Flattening of the World: A Book Review of “The World is Flat”" The Kabod 5 , no. 1 2018 (2018) Accessed [Month x, xxxx]. Liberty University Digital Commons. This Individual Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Kabod by an authorized editor of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Wade: Globalization and the Flattening of the World: A Book Review of “ Running Head: A BOOK REVIEW: THE WORLD IS FLAT 1 Globalization and the Flattening of the World: A Book Review of “The World is Flat” Shannon L. Wade Liberty University Published by Scholars Crossing, 2018 1 The Kabod, Vol. 5, Iss. 1 [2018], Art. 3 A BOOK REVIEW: THE WORLD IS FLAT 2 There is no doubt the world is changing.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Freedom and Two Friedmen: Musings on the Implications of Globalization for the Effective Regulation of Corporate Behavior
    University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law 2008 Human Freedom And Two Friedmen: Musings On The Implications Of Globalization For The Effective Regulation Of Corporate Behavior Leo E. Strine Jr. Vice Chancellor, Delaware Court of Chancery; Austin Wakeman Scott Lecturer in Law and Senior Fellow of the Corporate Governance Program, Harvard Law School; Adjunct Professor of Law, University of Pennsylvania Law School and Vanderbilt University School of Law; Henry Crown Fellow, Aspen Institute. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Business Organizations Law Commons, International Law Commons, Law and Economics Commons, and the Securities Law Commons Repository Citation Strine, Leo E. Jr., "Human Freedom And Two Friedmen: Musings On The Implications Of Globalization For The Effective Regulation Of Corporate Behavior" (2008). Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law. 180. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/180 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law by an authorized administrator of Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Embargoed Until Speech Is Delivered Human Freedom And Two Friedmen: Musings On The Implications Of Globalization For The Effective Regulation Of Corporate Behavior BY LEO E. STRINE, JR.1 UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO TORYS LECTURE The Isabel Bader Theatre Victoria University at the University of Toronto September 20, 2007 (Vice Chancellor Strine reserves the right to deviate from this text.) 1 Vice Chancellor, Delaware Court of Chancery; Austin Wakeman Scott Lecturer in Law, Harvard Law School; Adjunct Professor of Law, University of Pennsylvania Law School and Vanderbilt University School of Law; Henry Crown Fellow, Aspen Institute.
    [Show full text]
  • Between Nationalism and the Flat World of Thomas Friedman
    BETWEEN NATIONALISM AND THE FLAT WORLD OF THOMAS FRIEDMAN Cristian Spiridon* Abstract: The present paper aims to disseminate the impact of globalization on the nation-state throughout the history. The research objective consists in the reviewing of the assertion of the globalization phenomenon and the conflicts it stirred at the national level by reasons related to cultural, economic, social or political issues. The analysis will be conducted by two antagonistic positions: an optimistic view according to which globalization has a positive effect overall and a pessimistic one under which globalization causes the decline of the nation-state. The main findings will show that nationalism is not doomed to disappear, but instead it will adapt over time and will steal from the benefits globalization brings everything that culturally, politically, socially, or economically suits to a certain nation. Keywords: globalization; nationalism; nation-state; liberal democracy; Western World JEL Classification: A1; B11; B20; F10; F60 INTRODUCTION The debate of the essay is generally taken from two antagonistic positions: an optimistic position that considers the effects of globalization on economic, social, moral and cultural aspects of society today have been predominantly positive. On the other side lies ones who see and foresee the decline of the nation-state as caused by globalization which brings with it conflicts rather than the prosperity largely conjured up. Visions of a future that is not focused anymore on state as a central element of ensuring the welfare and social peace have features ranging from the utopian to a threatening character. One of the first "optimists" has been Francis Fukuyama who has imagined the end of history together with the global triumph of liberal democracy (Fukuyama, 1992).
    [Show full text]