DOCSLIB.ORG

2003-2004 DPP Annual Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2003-2004 DPP Annual Report DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS NORTHERN TERRITORY OF AUSTRALIA A N N U A L R E P O R T 2003-2004 OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS NORTHERN TERRITORY FOURTEENTH ANNUAL REPORT FOR YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2004 Printed by the Government Printer of the Northern Territory 2 Director of Public Prosecutions Northern Territory Rex Wild QC 43 Mitchell St Darwin NT 0800 Telephone (08) 8999 7533 30 September 2004 Facsimile (08) 8999 7821 GPO Box 3321 Darwin NT 0801 Australia The Hon Peter Toyne MLA Attorney-General Parliament House State Square DARWIN NT 0800 Dear Attorney-General ANNUAL REPORT 2003-2004 In accordance with the requirements of section 33 of the Director of Public Prosecutions Act, I submit to you the Annual Report on the performance of the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions for the period 1 July 2003 to 30 June 2004. This is the fourteenth Annual Report of the Office since its establishment in January 1991 and the ninth since my appointment in February 1996. This year’s Report does not include the various statements of guidelines issued and published pursuant to section 25 of the Director of Public Prosecutions Act. They had been published in each previous Annual Report following the date of their respective issue and implementation. New or amended guidelines will continue to be published in the Annual Report, but existing guidelines will be available on the ODPP website (www.nt.gov.au/justice/dpp) or on request. It is hoped that the information contained within the Report and on the website in respect of the Office will advance public knowledge of its operations and its role in the criminal justice system. 3 The various guidelines provide Crown prosecutors and others engaged in law enforcement with clear guidelines for the making of various decisions which arise in respect of prosecutions. They are intended also to inform the public generally of the considerations upon which those decisions are made. Yours sincerely REX WILD 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No OFFICE LOCATIONS 7 MISSION STATEMENT(S) 8-9 DIRECTOR’S OVERVIEW 11 ORGANISATION CHART 16 FUNCTIONS OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS 17 BUSINESS PLAN AND PERFORMANCE 19 PROFESSIONAL STAFF 29 PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES 33 • General workload 33 • Results 34 • Management 34 • Case summaries 35 • Appeals 35 • ODPP website 40 • Legislative review 41 • Continuing legal education 41 • Community Involvement 42 • Conference of Australian Directors 42 • Heads of Prosecuting Agencies Conference 43 • International Association of Prosecutors 44 • Criminal Lawyers’ Association of the Northern Territory 45 • Australian Association of Crown Prosecutors 46 SUMMARY PROSECUTIONS 47 WITNESS ASSISTANCE SERVICE 59 ABORIGINAL SUPPORT 67 5 6 OFFICE LOCATIONS 1. DIRECTOR'S CHAMBERS (Head Office) Level 2 Tourism House 43 Mitchell Street DARWIN NT 0800 GPO Box 3321 Telephone: (08) 8999 7315 DARWIN NT 0801 Fax: (08) 8999 7544 2. NORTHERN REGIONAL OFFICE DARWIN Level 1 Tourism House 43 Mitchell Street DARWIN NT 0800 Telephone: (08) 8999 7533 GPO Box 3321 Fax: (08) 8999 7821 DARWIN NT 0801 Free Call: 1800 659 449 3. SOUTHERN REGIONAL OFFICE ALICE SPRINGS 1st Floor Centrepoint Building Cnr Hartley St & Gregory Tce ALICE SPRINGS NT 0870 PO Box 2185 Telephone: (08) 8951 5800 ALICE SPRINGS NT 0871 Fax: (08) 8951 5812 7 MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions is to provide the people of the Northern Territory of Australia with an independent, professional and effective criminal prosecution service that: • operates with integrity • is fair and just to both victims and the accused and • is sensitive to the needs of victims, witnesses and to the interests of the community on whose behalf it acts. 8 MISSION STATEMENT (IN KRIOL) Wed bla DPP-mob DPP-mob bin pudimdan dijlat wed la dijan peipa dumaji olabat wandi dalim eberibodi bla no, hau detmob wandi duwim det wek bla olabat brabli raitwei. Det wek bla olabat, jei gada album yu bla dijkain trabul: maiti ib pilijimen im rekin samwan bin meigim brabli nogudwan trabul, laiga ib jei merdrem o kilimbat yu; ib jei stilimbat o demijim enijing blanganta yu. Maiti det pilijimen rekin det ting im lilbit nogudwan, wal olabat pilijimenmob teigim la kot. O maiti det pilijimen rekin det trabul im rili rongwei, wal det DPP- mob gada teigim la kot det nogudwan sambodi. Det DPP-mob olabat teigim yu pleis la kot, seimwei laig det Liguleid teigim pleis la det sabodi weya olabat rekin imin duwim rongwan ting. Det DPP-mob gan weistimbat taim en mani en olabat gan libim dijan hiya rul bla olabat wek: • Ola weka onli gada woriyabat faindimbat raitwan wed bla wot bin hepin - nomo laigim yu o heitim yu o yu femli o enibodi. Jei gan toktok la enibodi bla yu bijnij, onli la jeya weka wen jei albumbat yu. • Det DPP-mob wandim stap gudwan binji seimwei la yu en la det sambodi weya olabat rekin imin duwim det nogudwan ting. Jei wandi album yu gidim det samwan hu bin duwim det samting rong en faindat la kot raitwei bla banijim bla wot imin du. • Olabat DPP-mob wandi meigim bla yu en en det sambodi en ola widnijmob go la kot gudwei, nomo hambag en nomo bla meigim yu fil sheim. DPP-mob duwim dijkain wek bla album eberibodi la Northern Territory jidan seifwan en gudbinjigeja. DPP-mob bin pudim dan dislat wed la dijan peipa dumaji olabat wandim dalim eberibodi bla no, hau detmob wandi duwim det wek bla olabat brabli raitwei. 9 10 DIRECTOR’S OVERVIEW Introduction The core business of the Office of the Director of Public Prosecution (ODPP) is prosecuting. I believe it does that job in the Northern Territory very well. The ODPP has a very professional staff, well-qualified and appropriately experienced to carry out its function. From time-to-time the Office leadership can be distracted from the key role by the concerns raised by budgetary restraints and other administrative routines. There is little doubt that the inclusion of the Office within the Department of Justice has meant more, rather than less, bureaucracy. However, with a sympathetic ear from the Chief Executive Officer of the Department of Justice, Richard Coates, and many of his staff, and the diplomacy and management skills of our Business Manager, Lilia Garard, this Office has been able to maintain a certain level of administrative and financial independence such that its essential business has not suffered. Resource Issues In the main, the ODPP has been well looked after. However, there are outstanding areas of need for further financial provision. The Witness Assistance Service (WAS), particularly in the bush springs to mind. The need for a permanent professional presence in Katherine and a dedicated team for forfeiture matters are also matters for which resources will be pursued in 2004-2005. I referred earlier to essential business. The Office has had to reduce its involvement in quasi-criminal matters. I found it necessary to write to Mr Coates on 16 April 2004 in the following terms: I have in the past taken the view that it is desirable that all prosecuting work in the Northern Territory be, as far as possible, conducted by the same organisation. Obviously enough, that should be the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions. With this in mind, some time ago I took on the responsibility of providing advice and conducting prosecutions for various matters referred to me by agencies other than the police. 11 I find that it is quite impossible to continue to take on this additional work. It is often complicated (in fact, almost always so) and does not have the advantage of having been the subject of a police investigation. There is almost always a great deal of follow-up investigative work to be done and my prosecutors must take charge of that to some extent and direct those investigations. In short, I can no longer accept instructions of this kind. It is conceded that the Bradley Murdoch prosecution has created significant financial pressures, and the Government has met those without complaint. Similarly, the re-accommodation of the ODPP in Darwin is now planned to occur by the middle of 2005 and this will be in what is expected to be excellent offices in the Old Admiralty House building. The Office will maintain its geographical independence from other areas of the Department which, it is suggested, is important. As the section of this report on WAS notes, the pattern for clients and victim impact statement numbers over the years has been to show a gradual increase. However, it will be unrealistic to expect any further growth, irrespective of witness and victim needs, because all WAS officers are working to (and beyond, much of the time, I suspect) capacity. Any expansion of the service can only be with an associated increase in resources. One highlight of the financial year, as it were, was the granting of funds to enable WAS to produce a training DVD/video to enable it to assist people in remote communities to understand the justice process. The DVD/video was to be produced by Burrundi Pictures and was expected to be ready by September 2004. Legislative Changes During the year, the Sentencing (Crime of Murder) and Parole Reform Act was enacted and came into operation. The effect of the Act is to provide for standard minimum non-parole periods for the offence of murder. The transitional provisions have meant that prisoners sentenced in the early eighties, and therefore due for parole consideration shortly, have been the subject of review by me. Section 19 of the Act casts this responsibility on the Director.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mandatory Sentencing ______
    SYDNEY LAW SCHOOL Distinguished Speakers Program 15 May 2014 __________________________ MANDATORY SENTENCING ____________________________ Nicholas Cowdery AM QC Adjunct Professor, Sydney Institute of Criminology Former Director of Public Prosecutions, NSW Former President, International Association of Prosecutors Inaugural Co-Chair, Human Rights Institute, IBA Member, NSW Sentencing Council ________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION In her evidence to the Independent Commission Against Corruption in March 2014, former Labor Premier of NSW, Kristina Keneally, said of a particular allegedly falsified Cabinet Minute from the time of the Labor government: “This was the cabinet minute that wouldn't die until I drove a stake through its heart.'' Unfortunately, we are still waiting for the politician to come along to drive a stake through the heart of mandatory sentencing. Instead, it rises from its grave periodically, shifting its shape (as mandatory sentencing, mandatory minimum sentencing, grid sentencing, “baseline” sentencing, arguably standard non-parole periodsi and so on) and haunting us apparently at the whim of the politicians in power. I am delighted to have been asked to present this lecture, sponsored by the Rule of Law Institute of Australia, of which I am a Board Member. This is a serious issue for the rule of law and for criminal lawmakers and legal practitioners and academics everywhere. It is not the first time I have spoken on this subject and I shall come back to the position in Victoria a little later. CRIME AND PUNISHMENT First, a few comments about crime and punishment. Crimes are created by politicians – they legislate to proscribe certain conduct and to create penalties for breach of those proscriptions.
    [Show full text]
  • (WA) INQUIRY INTO END of LIFE CHOICES Submission by Nicholas Cowdery AM
    EOLC Sub 275 Rec'd 16/10/2017 JOINT SELECT COMMITTEE ON END OF LIFE CHOICES (WA) INQUIRY INTO END OF LIFE CHOICES Submission by Nicholas Cowdery AM QC1 ______________________ My submission is that the Committee should recommend to the Parliament of Western Australia that laws should be made that allow citizens to make informed decisions regarding their own end of life choices and enable those decisions to be implemented. I make that submission from the professional perspective of one who has spent 48 years in criminal justice in various capacities (as a professional assistant preparing Commonwealth prosecutions, as a public defender in Papua New Guinea, as a Barrister in NSW and elsewhere, as an acting Judge, as Director of Public Prosecutions, as a consultant and as a teacher). I am not drawing upon any personal experience of persons facing end of life choices, although I have known some and I am generally aware of the issues that arise. In more recent times I have spoken and written on the issues before the Committee in support of the submission made above, particularly as they concern NSW. My submission is directed principally towards terms of reference (b) and (c). CRIMINAL LAW Crime is created by lawmakers. Ever since humans came to live together we have needed rules for our conduct, in order to live together harmoniously and to have ways of resolving disputes that inevitably arise. Those rules are often enacted in our laws. Criminal laws are the rules that deal with matters arising in our relationships that are thought appropriate to be regulated and enforced by the state for the greater good, usually to prevent harm.
    [Show full text]
  • Spies, Lies and Ties Bernard Collaery and Witness K
    Spies, Lies and Ties Bernard Collaery and Witness K Richard Ackland – The Saturday Paper – 12 June 2021 https://www.thesaturdaypaper.com.au/opinion/topic/2021/06/12/bernard-collaery-and- witness-k/162342000011856 In Franz Kafka’s book The Trial the accused, Josef K, manages to arouse the court’s anger by loudly complaining about the absurdity of the proceedings and the accusation itself, if he could only understand it. The book is alternatively macabre and comical – much like the Commonwealth’s case against our own K, Witness K, and his former lawyer, Bernard Collaery. For anyone who hasn’t been living on Pluto, the essential issues are well rehearsed. The state, in the form of the former attorney-general Christian Porter and the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (CDPP), brought charges of conspiracy against Collaery and K, while the former is additionally charged with breaches of the Intelligence Services Act. These charges followed an alleged tipoff to ABC journalists about Australia’s government spying operation in the ministerial offices of Timor-Leste. This followed the seizure of Collaery’s brief of evidence for arbitral proceedings at The Hague. The fact that the same information also came to a journalist at The Australian is not part of the prosecution case. Witness K, acting on orders from the then head of the Australian Secret Intelligence Service (ASIS), David Irvine, assisted in planting the remote-switch listening devices while supposedly working on an Australian aid project. Collaery had been approved by the Inspector-General of Security and Intelligence to act for Witness K over allegations about his mistreatment by ASIS.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Tweaks That Would Change NSW and the Nation
    Legal Tweaks that would change NSW and the nation. 2018 Edited By Janai Tabbernor, Elise Delpiano and Blake Osmond Published By New South Wales Society of Labor Lawyers Artistic Design By Lewis Hamilton Cover Design By Laura Mowat Our Mission The New South Wales Society of Labor Lawyers aims, through scholarship and advoca- cy, to effect positive and equitable change in substantive and procedural law, the adminis- tration of justice, the legal profession, the provision of legal services and legal aid, and legal education. Copyright 2018 New South Wales Society of Labor Lawyers INC9896948. The 2018 Committee is Lewis Hamilton, Janai Tabbernor, Jade Tyrrell, Claire Pullen, Kirk McKenzie, Tom Kelly, Eliot Olivier, Rose Khalilizadeh, Philip Boncardo, Stephen Lawrence, Tina Zhou and Clara Edwards. Disclaimer Any views or opinions expressed are those of the individual authors and do not necessari- ly reflect the views and opinions of the New South Wales Society of Labor Lawyers or of the Australian Labor Party. Moreover, any organisations represented in this publication are not expressing association with the New South Wales Society of Labor Lawyers or the Australian Labor Party. Acknowledgements Our thanks goes to all those who contributed to this publication, and to the lawyers before them who built the modern Australian Labor Party and embedded social justice in our national identity. We especially thank our sponsors, Maurice Blackburn Lawyers, who carry on the inspiring legacy of Maurice McRae Blackburn, a champion lawyer and a federal Labor MP. 2 INTRODUCTIONLegal TweaksFAMILY LAW 1. Foreword - Mark Dreyfus QC MP 37. Janai Tabbernor 2. Foreword - Paul Lynch MP 38.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Analysis of Australian Prosecutorial Guidelines
    The Decision to Prosecute: A Comparative Analysis of Australian Prosecutorial Guidelines Natalie Hodgson, Judy Cashmore, Nicholas Cowdery, Jane Goodman- Delahunty, Natalie Martschuk, Patrick Parkinson, Martine B Powell and Rita Shackel* The decision whether to prosecute an individual can potentially impact a number of private and public interests. In Australia, the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions in each jurisdiction provides written prosecutorial guidelines relating to the decision to prosecute. Little scholarly attention has focused on how these guidelines differ in form and impact across jurisdictions. This article undertakes a text-based comparative analysis of the guidelines to identify the key similarities and differences in how the decision to prosecute is articulated in the policies of different Australian jurisdictions. This analysis shows that the tests used across Australia are broadly similar, while also identifying a number of differences. We highlight the need for empirical research on the decision to prosecute, to provide an insight into how the decision to prosecute is operationalised in practice, and how different formulations of the same or similar tests might impact the decision- making process. I. INTRODUCTION Deciding whether or not to prosecute an individual is one of the most significant decisions – if not the most significant decision – that a prosecutor can make, with the potential to greatly impact the lives of multiple individuals.1 If a matter proceeds to trial, an accused will face the stress and expense of a criminal trial, and the potential stigma of being prosecuted for a crime, regardless of whether he or she is ultimately found guilty. This stress and stigma can have flow-on effects – impacting the accused’s family, friends, and his or her relationships with them.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Witness K' Lawyer Bernard Collaery Got Jail Warning from Government
    http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-08-28/australian-spys-lawyer-threatened-with-jail-over-book/10155892 By Steve Cannane, ABC Investigations Updated Mon 27 Aug 2018, 11:42pm PHOTO: An activist paints the Australian Embassy wall during a protest in 2013 in Dili. (AAP/EPA: Antonio Dasiparu) The lawyer who helped expose an Australian spying operation on its ally Timor-Leste was given a chilling warning by the Federal Government, just months before charges were filed against him for breaches of the Intelligence Services Act. Lawyer Bernard Collaery has written a book the publisher says raises In a legal letter obtained by the ABC, Bernard Collaery was warned that if important questions about the he disclosed secret information about the Australian Secret Intelligence "integrity of systems of government" in Service (ASIS) in his book, due to be published next year, he could face "a Australia The Canberra lawyer and his client, maximum penalty of 10 years' imprisonment". former ASIS spy Witness K, have been summoned to appear in court The letter from the Australian Government Solicitor (AGS) warns he does next month not have approval to make "broader disclosures about ASIS staff members Experts are questioning why Mr and ASIS activities, much less to the world at large". Collaery and Witness K are being prosecuted years after evidence was It points out Mr Collaery agreed to particular rules — including a "secrecy gathered in raids undertaking" — so that he could legally represent an Australian spy. 'Witness K' lawyer Bernard Collaery got jail warning from Governme... 8/28/2018, 12:54 AM http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-08-28/australian-spys-lawyer-threatened-with-jail-over-book/10155892 PHOTO: Canberra lawyer Bernard Collaery has authored a book about Australia's relations with Timor-Leste.
    [Show full text]
  • 08 August 2016 Clarion 160725.Pages
    CLArion No 1608 – 01 August 2016 Email newsletter of Civil Liberties Australia (A04043) Email: Secretary(at)cla.asn.au Web: http://www.cla.asn.au/ Stand by for justice over stolen wages Civil Liberties Australia is aware of a major legal case, to be launched this month, seeking to claw back possibly more than $1 billion in wage payments NOT made to Indigenous people in Australia. For years, Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders in Queensland and other jurisdictions have been denied the wages due them for work they did for government and other bosses dating back beyond 100 years. They were subjected to a racist “protection” regime, where money they earned was paid to a “Protector of Aborigines” who, in most cases, protected the revenue flow to government coffers rather than provided relative benefit to the Indigenous people, individually or as a group. The Queensland and other jurisdictions – particularly WA and the NT – have proposed various compensation schemes over the years, but usually offering a pittance of what is due to those who literally slaved away without pay. Soon there will be a chance real dollars, in today’s value terms, might flow to rightful recipients. For the situation in WA, see: http://tinyurl.com/j5qwkuf PHOTO: Children branding cattle on a government station in the Kimberley, WA, in the 1910s. – State Library of WA Little sense in ABS approach to the census The national census will be held this month. You are free to decide whether you will be civilly disobedient by not giving your correct name on the census papers, or online – the government may take action against you if you do that, and you may be liable for a sizeable fine.
    [Show full text]
  • Temporary Judicial Officers in Australia
    Temporary Judicial Officers in Australia A Report Commissioned by the Judicial Conference of Australia May 2017 Associate Professor Gabrielle Appleby University of New South Wales Associate Professor Suzanne Le Mire University of Adelaide Professor Andrew Lynch University of New South Wales Professor Brian Opeskin University of Technology Sydney Corresponding author: Andrew Lynch <[email protected]> Temporary Judicial Officers in Australia TABLE OF CONTENTS Terms of Reference .............................................................................................. iv 1. Introduction .................................................................................................... 1 2. Legislative Overview of Temporary Judicial Officers .................................... 3 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................... 3 2.2 Appointment............................................................................................... 4 2.3 Eligibility .................................................................................................... 5 2.4 Duration of term ......................................................................................... 8 2.5 Renewal ...................................................................................................... 9 2.6 Mandatory retirement age ........................................................................ 10 2.7 Outside work ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Attorney Nicholas Cowdrey
    http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2015/s4360736.htm Twitter Australia-East Timor spying scandal: senior lawyer says 'crime was committed' Australian Broadcasting Corporation Broadcast: 26/11/2015 Reporter: Steve Cannane, Sashka Koloff In part two of a Lateline exclusive, Steve Cannane asks Nicholas Cowdery QC about his assessment of revelations that the Australian Secret Intelligence Service (ASIS) bugged cabinet rooms in Dili during secret negotiations over an oil and gas treaty. Transcript TONY JONES, PRESENTER: Last night on Lateline we examined the fallout from the spying scandal that's plagued relations between Australia and East Timor since a former ASIS officer known only as Witness K came forward to give evidence. K detailed an operation he led in 2004 to bug East Timor's cabinet rooms in Dili to give Australia an advantage during negotiations over an oil and gas treaty. Well the incident raises serious moral questions for Australia, but does that bad faith also raise serious legal questions? Tonight we'll hear from one of Australia's most senior lawyers, who's provided a written legal opinion that a crime was committed. Steve Cannane has our exclusive report, produced by Sashka Koloff. STEVE CANNANE, REPORTER: The Australian capital Canberra is the official friendship sister city to Dili. But a not-so-friendly plan to bug the cabinet rooms in East Timor's capital was conceived here in 2004. The Prime Minister of East Timor at the time says it was a crime. MARI ALKATIRI, FMR EAST TIMOR PRIME MINISTER (subtitles): I have no doubts on this, this kind of thing.
    [Show full text]
  • Barnewsthe JOURNAL of the NSW BAR ASSOCIATION | AUTUMN 2012 Bar News Editorial Committee ISSN 0817-0002 This Work Is Copyright
    Contents 2 Editor’s note 51 Bar history 77 Bullfry 3 President’s column Barristers in the Second World 80 Crossword by Rapunzel War (Part II) 6 Visit to Auburn Gallipoli Mosque 81 Bar sports Early Phillip Street Chambers 8 Opinion 83 Extempore 66 Appointments Advocacy and the truth R v David Allan Laundess The Hon Justice Bellew A distinction without difference Barbara Kissel v Schwartz & or a difference of distinction? The Hon Justice Stevenson Maines & Ruby et al The Hon Justice Beech-Jones 18 Recent developments 86 The Last Word The Hon Justice Rees 37 Feature His Honour Judge Arnott SC 88 Mason’s miscellany Rise and fall of the king of torts His Honour Judge Maiden SC 42 Practice His Honour Judge Mahony SC Advocacy training and the rule of law in southern Africa 74 Obituaries John Clifford Papayanni 45 Address Sandra Daniela Ocampo Community participation in criminal justice barnewsTHE JOURNAL OF THE NSW BAR ASSOCIATION | AUTUMN 2012 Bar News Editorial Committee ISSN 0817-0002 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, and subsequent amendments, Jeremy Stoljar SC (editor) Views expressed by contributors to Bar no part may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system Keith Chapple SC News are not necessarily those of the New or transmitted by any means or process without specific Arthur Moses SC South Wales Bar Association. Contributions written permission from the copyright owner. Requests are welcome and should be addressed to and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be Richard Beasley SC addressed to the editor, Bar News, c/- The New South Wales the editor, Jeremy Stoljar SC.
    [Show full text]
  • 2Col 05 May 2016 Clarion.Pages
    Here’s what else members say we should do: CLArion No 1605 – 01 May 2016 In the best response we’ve ever had to a call for comment, a Email newsletter of Civil Liberties Australia (A04043) Email: large number of CLA members responded with their main Secretary(at)cla.asn.au Web: http://www.cla.asn.au/ concerns, and several new ideas, after an appeal in the April CLArion. What we’ll be asking the pollies before Here – apart from what’s above – is what we could/should be the 2016 election doing as a nation, members say: After feedback from members on what issues mattered most, Federal: user-pays levy for use of local infrastructure Civil Liberties Australia will ask political candidates for the imposed on international companies that do not pay their fair 2016 federal election to publicly state their personal, and their share of local tax; no access to fuel subsidies unless a party’s, positions on the liberties and freedoms of Australians company pays full tax, on time (that is, no access while a tax in the list below. appeal in is progress – and no ‘catch-up’ fuel tax subsidy The answers will help members decide how they will vote. payment if the tax appeal is successful); restore the traditional CLA members are concerned the 2016 election does not privacy of Census information; remove Peter Dutton from the continue a steady erosion of Australians’ fundamental rights. Immigration portfolio; national ban on using plastic bags; As the Law Reform Commission’s recent ‘Freedoms’ report make training of politicians mandatory before they take up shows, the parliament is primarily responsible for Australians’ their positions (legal principles, government structures/ losing traditional liberties and rights over the past 15 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from the NSW ICAC ‘This Watchdog Has Teeth’
    Lessons from the NSW ICAC ‘This watchdog has teeth’ With the lessons of NSW ICAC in mind, a federal anti-corruption commission needs to have assured independence, adequate resourcing, proper accountability, coercive powers, public hearings, and ultimately the confidence of the public. Conference paper: Accountability and the Law Conference 2017 Nicholas Cowdery AM QC August 2017 LESSONS FROM NSW ICAC 1 Summary There is a strong need and broad public support for a federal anti-corruption commission with public hearings. Of the state commissions already established in Australia, NSW ICAC has been markedly successful in carrying out its legislated mission and provides a fair model for emulation, with refinement and adaptation, at the federal level. Premier Nick Greiner outlined in 1988 that NSW ICAC would only be effective with the powers of a Royal Commission, as “corruption is by its nature secretive and difficult to elicit. It is a crime of the powerful. It is consensual crime, with no obvious victim willing to complain”. o Such powers must be tempered by human rights considerations. o Premier Greiner also emphasised the role for ICAC in contributing to honest public administration, educating and advising public authorities and the community and in being a transparent and accountable body. The Cunneen case resulted in challenges to NSW ICAC’s independence, jurisdiction and ability to hold public hearings. This reaction was disproportionate to the core issue raised in the case which was promptly resolved by the High Court. This sort of broad attack on anti-corruption commissions can be fuelled by their success in investigating corruption at the highest levels of political power.
    [Show full text]