Impacts of the 1994 Assault Weapons
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Pistol Grip Power Tool Handle and Trigger Size Effects on Grip Exertions and Opera Tor Preference
HUMAN FACTORS, 1993,35(3),551-569 Pistol Grip Power Tool Handle and Trigger Size Effects on Grip Exertions and Opera tor Preference SEOUNGYEON OH and ROBERT G. RADWIN,1 University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin Finger and palmar forces were measured during actual pneumatic nutrunner op- eration using a strain gauge dynamometer. Eighteen student subjects were as- signed to one of three categories based on hand length. Two triggers and four handle spans were presented randomly. Handle span affected maximal and sub- maximal grip force. As span increased from 4 cm to 7 cm, average peak finger force increased 24%, peak palmar force increased 22%, and average finger and palmar tool-holding forces increased 20%. When an extended trigger was used, average peak finger force decreased 9%, peak palmar force decreased 8%, finger tool- holding force decreased 65%, and palmar tool-holding force decreased 48%. Hand size affected grip strength (MVC),grip force, and exertion level (force/MVC). Hold- ing exertion level was maximum for large-handed subjects using a 4-cm handle and for small-handed subjects using a 7-cm handle. Subjective handle span pref- erence increased as hand size increased. A similar experiment was performed using 11 factory workers. INTRODUCTION was connected directly to the use of pneu- matic screwdrivers and nutrunners. There is Pneumatic hand-held power tools are also growing concern about designing and se- widely used in industry. Power tools reduce lecting power tools for preventing cumulative manual force requirements, shorten the time trauma disorders (CTDs). to accomplish tasks, and improve the quality Repetitive motion, forceful exertion, awk- of work. -
Thompson Brochure 9Th Edition.Indd
9th Edition Own A Piece Of American History Thompson Submachine Gun General John T. Thompson, a graduate of West Point, began his research in 1915 for an automatic weapon to supply the American military. World War I was dragging on and casualties were mounting. Having served in the U.S. Army’s ordnance supplies and logistics, General Thompson understood that greater fi repower was needed to end the war. Thompson was driven to create a lightweight, fully automatic fi rearm that would be effective against the contemporary machine gun. His idea was “a one-man, hand held machine gun. A trench broom!” The fi rst shipment of Thompson prototypes arrived on the dock in New York for shipment to Europe on November 11, 1918 the day that the War ended. In 1919, Thompson directed Auto-Ordnance to modify the gun for nonmilitary use. The gun, classifi ed a “submachine gun” to denote a small, hand-held, fully automatic fi rearm chambered for pistol ammunition, was offi cially named the “Thompson submachine gun” to honor the man most responsible for its creation. With military and police sales low, Auto-Ordnance sold its submachine guns through every legal outlet it could. A Thompson submachine gun could be purchased either by mail order, or from the local hardware or sporting goods store. Trusted Companion for Troops It was, also, in the mid ‘20s that the Thompson submachine gun was adopted for service by an Dillinger’s Choice offi cial military branch of the government. The U.S. Coast Guard issued Thompsons to patrol While Auto-Ordnance was selling the Thompson submachine gun in the open market in the ‘20s, boats along the eastern seaboard. -
Ar15 Semi—Automatic Instruction/ Safety Manual Caution
AR15 SEMI—AUTOMATIC INSTRUCTION/ SAFETY MANUAL CAUTION: USE ONLY CLEAN, DRY, ORIGINAL, HIGH QUALITY COMMERCIALLY MANUFACTURED AMMUNITION IN GOOD CONDITON which is appropriate to the caliber of your firearm. We do not recommend the use of remanufactured or hand loaded ammunition because it may cause severe damage to yourself and/ or your rifle. Page 1 SECTION 1 PRECAUTIONS READ AND UNDERSTAND ALL THE FOLLOWING PRECAUTIONS BEFORE REMOVING THIS FIREARM FROM ITS PACKAGE. ! WARNING: IF THIS FIREARM IS CARELESSLY OR IMPROPERLY HANDLED, UNINTENTIONAL DISCHARGE COULD RESULT AND COULD CAUSE INJURY, DEATH, OR DAMAGE TO PROPERTY. CAUTION: PRIOR TO LOADING AND FIRING, CAREFULLY READ THIS INSTRUCTION MANUAL WHICH GIVES BASIC ADVICE ON THE PROPER HANDLING AND FUNCTIONING OF THIS RADICAL FIREARMS SYSTEM. However, your safety and the safety of others (including your family) depends on your mature compliance with that advice, and your adoption, development and constant employment of safe practices. If unfamiliar with firearms, seek further advice through safe handling courses run by your local gun clubs, NRA approved instructor, or similar qualified organizations. Page 2 NOTICE: Radical Firearms shall not be responsible for injury, death, or damage to property resulting from either intentional or accidental discharge of this firearm, or from its function when used for purposes or subjected to treatment for which it was not designed. Radical Firearms will not honor claims involving this firearm which result from careless or improper handling, unauthorized adjustment or parts replacement, corrosion, neglect, or the use of wrong caliber ammunition, or the use of ammunition other than original high quality commercially manufactured ammunition in good condition, or any combination thereof. -
Download Enemy-Threat-Weapons
UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS THE BASIC SCHOOL MARINE CORPS TRAINING COMMAND CAMP BARRETT, VIRGINIA 22134-5019 ENEMY THREAT WEAPONS B2A2177 STUDENT HANDOUT/SELF PACED INSTRUCTION Basic Officer Course B2A2177 Enemy Threat Weapons Enemy Threat Weapons Introduction In 1979, the Soviets invaded Afghanistan. The Soviets assumed this would be a short uneventful battle; however, the Mujahadeen had other plans. The Mujahadeen are guardians of the Afghani way of live and territory. The Soviets went into Afghanistan with the latest weapons to include the AK-74, AKS-74, and AKSU-74, which replaced the venerable AK-47 in the Soviet Arsenals. The Mujahadeen were armed with Soviet-made AK-47s. This twist of fate would prove to be fatal to the Soviets. For nearly 11 years, the Mujahadeen repelled the Soviet attacks with Soviet-made weapons. The Mujahadeen also captured many newer Soviet small arms, which augmented their supplies of weaponry. In 1989, the Soviet Union withdrew from Afghanistan back to the other side of the mountain. The Mujahadeen thwarted a communist take- over with their strong will to resist and the AK-47. This is important to you because it illustrates what an effective weapon the AK-47 is, and in the hands of a well-trained rifleman, what can be accomplished. Importance This is important to you as a Marine because there is not a battlefield or conflict that you will be deployed to, where you will not find a Kalashnikov AK-47 or variant. In This Lesson This lesson will cover history, evolution, description, and characteristics of foreign weapons. -
(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2007/0051236A1 Groves Et Al
US 2007005 1236A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2007/0051236A1 Groves et al. (43) Pub. Date: Mar. 8, 2007 (54) TRIGGER MECHANISM FOR FIREARMS Related U.S. Application Data WITH SELF-ILOADING ACTIONS (60) Provisional application No. 60/713,722, filed on Sep. (75) Inventors: G. Blaine Groves, Dundas (CA); E. 6, 2005. Charles Franklin, Kitchener (CA) Publication Classification Correspondence Address: BORDEN LADNER GERVAS LLP (51) Int. Cl. WORLD EXCHANGE PLAZA F4C 7700 (2006.01) 1OO QUEEN STREETSUTE 1100 (52) U.S. Cl. .............................. 89/142: 42/69.03; 89/140 OTTAWA, ON K1P 1J9 (CA) (57) ABSTRACT (73) Assignee: Colt Canada Corporation, Kitchener The trigger mechanism allows the firearm to operate in a (CA) closed-bolt mode during semi-automatic fire and in an open-bolt mode during automatic fire. The mode change occurs only after the first round is discharged after the (21) Appl. No.: 11/470,026 selector has been moved instead of when the selector switch is moved, thus avoiding undesirable mechanism noise or (22) Filed: Sep. 5, 2006 motion at the time of selecting the firing mode. Patent Application Publication Mar. 8, 2007 Sheet 1 of 24 US 2007/0051236A1 FIG.1 Patent Application Publication Mar. 8, 2007 Sheet 3 of 24 US 2007/0051236A1 Patent Application Publication Mar. 8, 2007 Sheet 4 of 24 US 2007/0051236A1 Patent Application Publication Mar. 8, 2007 Sheet 5 of 24 US 2007/0051236A1 FIG.6B Patent Application Publication Mar. 8, 2007 Sheet 6 of 24 US 2007/0051236A1 54 53 55 52 56 FG.9 Patent Application Publication Mar. -
Illinois Current Through P.A
State Laws and Published Ordinances – Illinois Current through P.A. 101-591 of the 2019 Regular Session of the 101st General Assembly. Office of the Attorney General Chicago Field Division 100 West Randolph Street 175 West Jackson Blvd., Suite Chicago, IL 60601 1500Chicago, IL 60604 Voice: (312) 814-3000 Voice: (312) 846-7200 http://www.illinoisattorneygeneral.gov/ https://www.atf.gov/chicago- field-division Table of Contents Chapter 430 – Public Safety Firearm Owners Identification Card Act Section 430 ILCS 65/1.1. Firearm defined; Firearm ammunition defined. Section 430 ILCS 65/2. Firearm Owner's Identification Card required; exceptions. Section 430 ILCS 65/3. Transfer of firearms; records; exceptions. Section 430 ILCS 65/3a. Reciprocal rights in Iowa, Missouri, Indiana, Wisconsin and Kentucky. Section 430 ILCS 65/3.1. Dial up system. Section 430 ILCS 65/3.2. List of prohibited projectiles; notice to dealers. Section 430 ILCS 65/4. Application for Firearm Owner's Identification Card. Section 430 ILCS 65/5. Approval or denial of application; fees. Section 430 ILCS 65/6. Contents of Firearm Owner's Identification Card. Section 430 ILCS 65/7. Validity of Firearm Owner’s Identification Card. Section 430 ILCS 65/8. Grounds for denial and revocation. Section 430 ILCS 65/8.1. Notifications to the Department of State Police. Section 430 ILCS 65/8.2. Firearm Owner's Identification Card denial or revocation. Section 430 ILCS 65/8.3. Suspension of Firearm Owner's Identification Card. Section 430 ILCS 65/9. Grounds for denial or revocation. Section 430 ILCS 65/9.5. Revocation of Firearm Owner's Identification Card. -
PREAMBLE Whereas the People of the State of Oregon Find That Gun Violence in Oregon and the United States, Resulting in Horrific
PREAMBLE Whereas the People of the State of Oregon find that gun violence in Oregon and the United States, resulting in horrific deaths and devastating injuries due to mass shootings and other homicides, is unacceptable at any level; and Whereas the firearms referred to as “semiautomatic assault firearms” are designed with features to allow rapid spray firing or the quick and efficient killing of humans, and the unregulated availability of semiautomatic assault firearms used in such mass shootings and other homicides in Oregon, and throughout the United States, poses a grave and immediate risk to the health, safety and well-being of the citizens of this State, and in particular our children; and Whereas firearms have evolved from muskets to semiautomatic assault firearms, including rifles, shotguns and pistols with enhanced features and with the ability to kill so many in such an increasingly short period of time, unleashing death and unspeakable pain in places that should be safe: our homes, schools, places of worship, shopping malls, communities; and Whereas a failure to resolve long unrest and inequitable treatment of individuals based on race, gender, religion and other distinguishing characteristics and failure to develop legislative tools to remove the ability of those with criminal intent or predisposition to commit violence from acquiring such instruments of carnage and never-ending sadness; It is therefore morally incumbent upon the citizens of Oregon to take immediate action, which we do by this initiative, to reduce the availability of these assault firearms, and thus reduce their ability to cause death and loss in places that should remain safe; Now, therefore, BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF OREGON: SECTION 1. -
Mg 34 and Mg 42 Machine Guns
MG 34 AND MG 42 MACHINE GUNS CHRIS MC NAB © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com MG 34 AND MG 42 MACHINE GUNS CHRIS McNAB Series Editor Martin Pegler © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 4 DEVELOPMENT 8 The ‘universal’ machine gun USE 27 Flexible firepower IMPACT 62 ‘Hitler’s buzzsaw’ CONCLUSION 74 GLOSSARY 77 BIBLIOGRAPHY & FURTHER READING 78 INDEX 80 © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com INTRODUCTION Although in war all enemy weapons are potential sources of fear, some seem to have a deeper grip on the imagination than others. The AK-47, for example, is actually no more lethal than most other small arms in its class, but popular notoriety and Hollywood representations tend to credit it with superior power and lethality. Similarly, the bayonet actually killed relatively few men in World War I, but the sheer thought of an enraged foe bearing down on you with more than 30cm of sharpened steel was the stuff of nightmares to both sides. In some cases, however, fear has been perfectly justified. During both world wars, for example, artillery caused between 59 and 80 per cent of all casualties (depending on your source), and hence took a justifiable top slot in surveys of most feared tools of violence. The subjects of this book – the MG 34 and MG 42, plus derivatives – are interesting case studies within the scale of soldiers’ fears. Regarding the latter weapon, a US wartime information movie once declared that the gun’s ‘bark was worse than its bite’, no doubt a well-intentioned comment intended to reduce mounting concern among US troops about the firepower of this astonishing gun. -
Diplomski Rad
SVEUČILIŠTE U ZAGREBU FAKULTET STROJARSTVA I BRODOGRADNJE DIPLOMSKI RAD Dejan Devetak Zagreb, 2013. SVEUČILIŠTE U ZAGREBU FAKULTET STROJARSTVA I BRODOGRADNJE DIPLOMSKI RAD Mentori: Student: Prof. Dr. Sc. Mirko Jakopčić Dejan Devetak Zagreb, 2013. Izjavljujem da sam ovaj rad izradio samostalno koristeći stečena znanja tijekom studija i navedenu literaturu. Zahvaljujem se mentoru prof.dr.sc Mirku Jakopčići na strpljenju i pruženoj pomoći. Dejan Devetak Ime Prezime Diplomski rad Fakultet strojarstva i brodogradnje 5 Ime Prezime Diplomski rad SADRŽAJ SADRŽAJ................................................................................................................................... I POPIS SLIKA...........................................................................................................................III POPIS TABLICA ......................................................................................................................V POPIS OZNAKA..................................................................................................................... VI SAŽETAK .............................................................................................................................. VII SUMMARY...........................................................................................................................VIII 1. UVOD ..................................................................................................................................1 2. POVIJESNI RAZVOJ KONCEPTA JURIŠNE PUŠKE.....................................................3 -
A New York City Rifle and Shotgun Permit Application
LICENSE DIVISION APPLICATION — RIFLE / SHOTGUN PERMIT RIFLE / SHOTGUN SECTION PD 641-040 (Rev. 03-13) 120-55 Queens Blvd, B-11 Kew Gardens, New York 11424 718-520-9300 1. Complete each form as directed and answer all questions. All entries must be clearly printed in ink (Blue or Black) or typed. 2. The minimum age to receive a permit is 21. 3. If you were ever arrested for any crime or violation you must submit a certifi cate of disposition from the court concerned indicating the offense and the fi nal disposition of the charges. You must do this even if the case was dismissed, the record sealed or the case nullifi ed by operation of law (i.e. Youthful Offender status). The New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services will report to us every instance involving the arrest of an applicant. Do not rely on anyone’s representation that you need not list a previous arrest. ANY OMISSION OF A PREVIOUS ARREST MAY RESULT IN THE DENIAL OF YOUR APPLICATION. You must submit a notarized statement explaining the circumstances of the arrest. 4. If you were ever convicted of a felony, before your application can be considered, you must apply for a Certifi cate of Relief from Forfeitures and Disabilities from New York State. 5. If you were ever convicted of a Serious Offense you must get a New York State Certifi cate of Relief from Forfeitures and Disabilities. Serious Offenses are listed in Section 265.00(17) of the Penal Law. They include any offense involving drugs or narcotics, any sex offense, any violation of the laws pertaining to the illegal use or possession of a pistol or other dangerous weapon, possession of burglars tools and receiving stolen property. -
The Swerve to “Guns Everywhere”: a Legal and Empirical Evaluation
BOOK PROOF - DONOHUE (DO NOT DELETE) 8/5/2020 4:04 PM THE SWERVE TO “GUNS EVERYWHERE”: A LEGAL AND EMPIRICAL EVALUATION JOHN J. DONOHUE* I INTRODUCTION There has been a profound shift in the legal landscape concerning firearms over the last forty years. Before then, substantial state restrictions—even complete prohibitions—on gun carrying were quite common, and they enjoyed considerable support among Republican voters and politicians. Today, the large majority of states confer the “right-to-carry” (RTC) with little or no restriction. After unwisely granting cert and proceeding with oral argument in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. City of New York, in which the U.S. Supreme Court was asked to create an individual right under the Second Amendment to carry guns outside the home, the Court chose to leave this question for another day.1 One argument frequently used to justify this expansion of the Second Amendment is that good guys with guns can quickly thwart mass shootings. Yet since the end of the federal assault weapons ban in 2004, deaths from mass shootings have been rising sharply even as lawful gun toting has increased substantially.2 Moreover, a growing body of evidence suggests that allowing expanded gun access outside the home has increased violent crime. While New York State Rifle and Pistol Association, which involved an idiosyncratic and moot provision of city law, would have been a terrible vehicle to make new constitutional law, it did have the potential to either confine the Copyright © 2020 by John J. Donohue. This Article is also available online at http://lcp.law.duke.edu/. -
New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n V. Cuomo Opinion
New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. Cuomo United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit December 9, 2014, Argued; October 19, 2015, Decided Reporter 804 F.3d 242 *; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 18121 ** semiautomatic assault weapons and large-capacity US Supreme Court certiorari denied by Shew v. Malloy, magazines do not violate the Second Amendment, and 2016 U.S. LEXIS 3959 (U.S., June 20, 2016) that the challenged individual provisions are not void for vagueness. The particular provision of New York's law Prior History: [**1] On Appeal from the United States regulating load limits, however, does not survive the District Court for the Western District of New York. requisite scrutiny. One further specific provision— Connecticut's prohibition on the non-semiautomatic On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Remington 7615—unconstitutionally infringes upon the District of Connecticut. Second Amendment right. Accordingly, we AFFIRM [*248] in part the judgment of the District Court for the District of Connecticut insofar [**5] as it upheld the Judges: Before: CABRANES, LOHIER, and DRONEY, prohibition of semiautomatic assault weapons and large- Circuit Judges. capacity magazines, and REVERSE in part its holding with respect to the Remington. With respect to the Opinion by: JOSÉ A. CABRANES judgment of the District Court for the Western District of New York, we REVERSE in part certain vagueness Opinion holdings, and we otherwise AFFIRM that judgment insofar as it upheld the prohibition of semiautomatic assault weapons and large-capacity magazines and [*247] JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Circuit Judge: invalidated the load limit.