Natural, Historic, and Cultural Resources

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Natural, Historic, and Cultural Resources Town of Palmer Master Plan | 2021 DRAFT Natural, Historic, and Cultural Resources Natural, Historic, and Cultural Resources The natural environment, inclusive of air, water, soil, and vegetation (and the interactions among them), is an important aspect of a community’s function. It holds tremendous value by contributing to human health and well-being in various manners inclu4ding, but certainly not limited to, the provision of food, respite from urban environments, recreational opportunities, and hazard mitigation (e.g., flood storage). A community’s cultural identity is influenced by its history. This history is manifested in its historic resources, such as buildings, sites, landmarks, or districts, which tell the story of a how the community came to be, including the persons or events that shaped its development. A community’s cultural identity is also embodied in the manners by which its diverse inhabitants interact and for what purposes. These interactions are shaped by local organizations and facilities providing programs and activities that bring people together for a common purpose (e.g., arts, entertainment, education, religion, and charitable giving). Together, natural, historic, and cultural resources play important roles in defining a community’s values and sense of place. Increasing development and intensive human activities, however, can cause them irreparable harm. Accordingly, this Element not only highlights and characterizes the natural, historic, and cultural resources in the Town of Palmer, it also identifies strategies for their protection and enhancement. Baseline Conditions Analyses Natural Resources The Town of Palmer enjoys a diverse range of natural resources, including prime farmland soils, wildlife habitats, and water resources. By inventorying these resources, the Town can identify those that are critical and deserve special attention and protection from threats, such as the expansion of development. 1 Town of Palmer Master Plan | 2021 DRAFT Natural, Historic, and Cultural Resources The following sections leverage information Nearly 52 percent of persons prepared for the Town’s 2014 Open Space responding to this Master Plan’s first and Recreation Plan (OSRP), prepared by the public survey identified Palmer’s Palmer Open Space and Recreation Update “natural and scenic areas” as a quality Committee with assistance from the Pioneer that contributes to making the Town a Valley Planning Commission. Though the great place to live, and nearly 30 Town is currently in the process of updating percent identified “loss of natural its OSRP, much of the information provided lands to new development” as their in the 2014 plan remains relevant. biggest land use concern. Geology, Soils, and Topography Palmer is one of the northernmost towns in Hampden County within the central uplands of Massachusetts. It sits at the confluence of three rivers forming the Chicopee River, south of the Quabbin Reservoir and east of the Connecticut River Valley on the Worcester Plateau. The geology of the Town and its larger region is a reflection of the relatively recent glacial history that imprinted its effects on the land. Moderately thick ice-deposited glacial till and exposed bedrock in the rugged uplands intermingle with glacial out wash terraces and alluvial deposits in the major river valleys and floodplain terraces. According to the United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources and Conservation Service Soil Survey, there are four major soil associations that make up the Town’s land area. These include the Charlton-Woodbridge-Paxton Association, Narragansett-Charlton Association, Hinckley-Windsor-Merrimac Association, and Brookfield-Brimfield Association. The Hinckley-Windsor-Merrimac Association soils derive from glacial outwash, while the others are glacial till with varying drainage and slope. Figure 4-1 depicts the areas of agricultural soils in Palmer. Roughly 7 percent of the Town is comprised of prime farmland, 2 percent is comprised of farmland of unique importance, and 17 percent is comprised of farmland of statewide importance. The definitions of these soil categories are provided below. ▸ Prime Farmland Soils – Land that has the best combination of physical and chemical characteristics for producing food, feed, forage, fiber, and oilseed crops, and is also available for these uses (i.e., the land could be cropland, pastureland, rangeland, forest land, or other land, but not urban built-up land or water). ▸ Farmland Soils of Unique Importance – Land other than prime farmland that is used for the production of specific high value food and fiber crops, such as citrus, tree nuts, olives, cranberries, fruit, and vegetables. ▸ Farmland Soils of Statewide Importance – Land in addition to prime and unique farmlands that is of statewide importance for the production of food, feed, forage, fiber, and oilseed crops, as determined by the appropriate state agency of agencies. Further, these lands generally include soils that are nearly prime farmland and that economically produce high yields of crops when treated and managed according to acceptable farming methods. 2 Town of Palmer Master Plan | 2021 DRAFT Natural, Historic, and Cultural Resources 3 Town of Palmer Master Plan | 2021 DRAFT Natural, Historic, and Cultural Resources Elevations in Palmer range from 330 feet above sea level within flood plains and river corridors to peaks at Mt. Pattaquatic (1,094 feet) and Colonel’s Mountain (1,129 feet). Steep hills and ridges on glacial uplands with stone outcrops are predominantly located within the Town’s eastern and northern parts, while gentle slops generally comprise the remainder of the Town. Some lands in Palmer, and more generally speaking, are more prone to problems such as erosion and flooding. Accordingly, they are sensitive to development and intensive land uses. These conditions are influenced by steep slopes and stony and erosive subsoils. Landscape Character Upland forests, rocky ledges, river valleys, and ponds and wetlands help to define the visual character of Palmer from a natural environment perspective, along with the Town’s rolling hills and mountain peaks that provide scenic views. Built-up areas have historically been concentrated in the river valley areas – in the villages of Bondsville, Depot Village, Thorndike, and Three Rivers, though encroachment upon forested uplands as well as non- forested open spaces has taken place in recent years. This encroachment threatens the unique character of the Town, including its scenic views, as well as the services that these areas offer (e.g., recreational uses, wildlife habitat, watershed productivity). Water Resources Palmer has numerous water resources, including rivers, ponds, and wetlands. Together, these resources comprise approximately 3 percent of the Town’s total land area. Notably, four rivers intersect the Town including the Quaboag, Ware, and Swift Rivers, which form the headwaters of the Chicopee River that flows through Palmer downstream to the Connecticut River. The Chicopee River basin is the largest basin in Massachusetts at 721 square miles, and all of Palmer is within the Chicopee River Watershed – an important sub-watershed within the larger Connecticut River Watershed. The Chicopee River Watershed includes the Swift River, Quaboag River, Ware River, and Chicopee River subbasins. Given these connections, local water resources are integral to regional water systems, and any changes to local water quality can have associated impacts in surrounding towns and the larger region. The following sections discuss the various water resources found in the Town of Palmer. The locations of these resources are shown in Figures 4-2 through 4-4. Surface Waters As mentioned, Palmer has four major rivers flowing through its municipal boundaries (see Figure 4-2). The Quaboag, Ware, Swift, and Chicopee Rivers collectively provide recreational opportunities, wildlife habitat, and flood control. Among these rivers, however, only the Quaboag and Swift Rivers can be publicly accessed. The Ware and Chicopee Rivers can only be accessed by way of privately held lands. Additionally, the Town boasts three lakes and five ponds. Among the lakes, Forest Lake is the only publicly accessible waterbody and is the largest covering approximately 44 acres. Lake Thompson is the next largest at 32 acres, followed by Crystal Lake at 16 acres. 4 Town of Palmer Master Plan | 2021 DRAFT Natural, Historic, and Cultural Resources Palmer’s five ponds include the privately-owned Round Pond, Ice House Pond, Allen’s Pond, and Knox Pond, as well as the Town-owned Lily Pond. Knox Pond and Lily Pond are both publicly accessible, with Knox Pond frequently used by educational facilities as an educational workshop. Aquifer Recharge Areas The provisions and requirements of Article XIV: Water Supply Protection District within the Town’s Zoning Ordinance offer protections for the Town’s aquifer recharge areas, including by designating permitted, prohibited, and restricted uses. The Town’s larger aquifer recharge areas are located at the confluence of the Swift and Ware Rivers, as well as at the Quaboag River by South Main Street in Depot Village. Smaller aquifer recharge areas in the Town are widely distributed. A map of the Water Supply Protection District is on file with the Town Clerk. Relatedly, Figure 4-3 illustrates water supply assets, including surface water protection areas, outstanding resource waters, and public water supply sources. The Palmer Reservoir and surrounding areas
Recommended publications
  • Ocm39986872-1915-HB-0190.Pdf (210.8Kb)
    HOUSE No. 190 Bill' accompanying' the recommendations of the Board of Harbor and Land Commissioners (House, No. 187). Harbors and Public Lands. January 11. Cf)c Commontoealtl) of Massachusetts. In the Year One Thousand Nine Hundred and Fifteen. AN ACT To provide for the Care and Supervision of the Westfield River, Chicopee River, Deerfield River and Millers River. Be it enacted hy the Senat and House of Representativet in General Court assembled and hy the authority of the tame, as follows of harbor and 1 Section 1 . The board land commission- -2 ers shall have the general care and supervision of the fol- -3 lowing rivers, tributariesof the Connecticut river, namely : 4 Westfield-river, Chicopee river, Deerfield river and Millers 5 river, within the confines of this commonwealth, and ot fi the banks thereof and of all structures therein, in order to 7 prevent and remove unauthorized encroachments and 8 causes of every kind which may in any way injure said q rivers and to protect and develop the rights and property 10 of the public therein. For the purpose of ascertaining promoting the best methods for the preservation and 9 SUPERVISION OF RIVERS. fjan. 1915. 12 improvement of said rivers, and for the promotion ot a 13 interests connected therewith, as the public good may 14 require, the board may from time to time make such 15 surveys, examinations and observations as it may deem It! necessary. 1 Section 2. All persons now or hereafter authorized 2 by the general court to build any structures in said 3 rivers shall proceed in the manner provided in section 4 sixteen of chapter ninety-six of the Revised Laws, and 5 shall be subject to the provisions of the said chapter.
    [Show full text]
  • CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN ANADROMOUS FISH RESTORATION: Coordination and Technical Assistance F-100-R-31
    CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN ANADROMOUS FISH RESTORATION: Coordination and Technical Assistance F-100-R-31 Annual Progress Report October 1, 2013 - September 30, 2014 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Connecticut River Coordinator's Office Kenneth Sprankle, Project Leader 103 East Plumtree Road Sunderland, MA 01375-9138 Executive Summary Federal Aid Project #F-100-R-31 States: Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Hampshire and Vermont Project Title: Connecticut River Basin Anadromous Fish Restoration: Coordination and Technical Assistance Period Covered: October 1, 2013 - September 30, 2014 This annual report provides an opportunity to organize and document, to varying degrees, all work activities conducted by the Connecticut River Coordinator’s Office, which includes work outside of the Connecticut River basin and numerous activities not funded by this grant. Objectives: Coordinate the Connecticut River Anadromous Fish Restoration Program as a unified effort of State and Federal fishery agencies Provide technical assistance to the fishery agencies and other program cooperators Identify fishery program priorities, design and implement field projects to address issues, plans, and opportunities Administer several different federal grant programs to address fish habitat, fish passage, and research projects Accomplishments: Program Coordination: Coordinated two Connecticut River Atlantic Salmon Commission (CRASC) and two CRASC Technical Committee meetings Organized a CRASC Shad Studies and River Herring subcommittee meeting Assisted in the completion
    [Show full text]
  • Connecticut River Flow Restoration Study Report
    Connecticut River Flow Restoration Study STUDY REPORT A watershed-scale assessment of the potential for flow restoration through dam re-operation THE NATURE CONSERVANCY, U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST The Connecticut River Flow Restoration Study A watershed-scale assessment of the potential for flow restoration through dam re-operation Katie Kennedy, The Nature Conservancy Kim Lutz, The Nature Conservancy Christopher Hatfield, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Leanna Martin, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Townsend Barker, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Richard Palmer, University of Massachusetts Amherst Luke Detwiler, University of Massachusetts Amherst Jocelyn Anleitner, University of Massachusetts Amherst John Hickey, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Kennedy, K., K. Lutz, C. Hatfield, L. Martin, T. Barker, R. Palmer, L. Detwiler, J. Anleitner, J. Hickey. 2018. The Connecticut River Flow Restoration Study: A watershed-scale assessment of the potential for flow restoration through dam re-operation. The Nature Conservancy, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and University of Massachusetts Amherst. Northampton, MA. Available: http://nature.org/ctriverwatershed For a quick, easy-to-read overview of the Connecticut River Watershed Study, see our companion “Study Overview” document, available at: http://nature.org/ctriverwatershed June 2018 Table of Contents Table of Contents ..................................................................................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Samplepalo Ooza 201 4
    Samplepalooza 2014 Compiled by Andrea Donlon & Ryan O’Donnell Connecticut River Watershed Council 0 Samplepalooza 2014 Acknowledgements: CRWC would like thank the following staff people and volunteers who collected samples and/or participated in planning meetings: CRWC staff Peggy Brownell Andrea Donlon David Deen Andrew Fisk Ron Rhodes VT Department of Environmental Conservation Marie Caduto Tim Clear Ben Copans Blaine Hastings Jim Ryan Dan Needham NH Department of Environmental Services Amanda Bridge Barona DiNapoli Tanya Dyson Margaret (Peg) Foss Andrea Hansen David Neils Vicki Quiram Ted Walsh Watershed organizations: Black River Action Team – Kelly Stettner Ottaqueechee River Group – Shawn Kelley Southeast Vermont Watershed Alliance – Phoebe Gooding, Peter Bergstrom, Laurie Callahan, Cris White White River Partnership – Emily Miller CRWC volunteers: Greg Berry Marcey Carver Glenn English Jim Holmes Liberty Foster Paul Friedman Paul Hogan Sean Lawson Mark Lembke Dianne Rochford 1 Samplepalooza 2014 Table of Contents Acknowledgements: ............................................................................................................................................. 1 List of Tables ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 List of Figures .................................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction .........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendx B Chicopee River Watershed: 2003 Water Quality Technical
    APPENDX B CHICOPEE RIVER WATERSHED: 2003 WATER QUALITY TECHNICAL MEMOMORANDUM (TM36-3) Prepared by Greg DeCesare 2006 DWM Control Number CN 106.2 Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Robert W. Golledge Jr., Secretary Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Arleen O’Donnell Acting Commissioner Bureau of Resource Protection Glenn Haas, Acting Assistant Commissioner Division of Watershed Management Glenn Haas, Director B1 Table of Contents List of Tables and Figures............................................................................................................................. 2 Introduction and Project Objectives .............................................................................................................. 3 Quality Assurance and Quality Control ......................................................................................................... 3 Survey Methods ............................................................................................................................................ 3 Station Observations................................................................................................................................... 11 Survey Conditions ....................................................................................................................................... 21 Water Quality Data.....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Burlington Admission to the MWRA Waterworks System
    THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS WATER RESOURCES COMMISSION 100 CAMBRIDGE STREET, BOSTON MA 02114 REPORT OF THE FINDINGS, JUSTIFICATIONS, AND DECISION OF THE WATER RESOURCES COMMISSION Relating to the Approval of the Town of Burlington’s Request for an Interbasin Transfer Pursuant to M.G.L. Chapter 21 § 8C DECISION On November 12, 2020, by a ten to one (10-1) vote, the Massachusetts Water Resources Commission (WRC) approved the Town of Burlington’s request for an Interbasin Transfer to join the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority (MWRA) Water Works System. This vote was taken after review of the facts provided by the Town of Burlington, analysis of the associated data, and consideration of comments received concerning this request. INTRODUCTION On November 26, 2019, the WRC received a request from the Town of Burlington for approval of an action to increase the present rate of interbasin transfer under the Interbasin Transfer Act (ITA) (M.G.L. Chapter 21 §§ 8B-8D) as part of a Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) submitted to the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) office. The DEIR proposed a water supply transfer through an interconnection to MWRA. Additional information was requested by the WRC and received in the Final EIR, submitted in February 2020. The Secretary’s Certificate on the FEIR was issued on April 17, 2020. The WRC accepted Burlington’s application as complete at its May 14, 2020 meeting. Burlington is proposing to purchase a maximum of 6.5 million gallons per day (MGD) of water from MWRA to supplement its existing water supply source, the Mill Pond Reservoir (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • T Ro U T Sto C K E D Wat E Rs
    2021 MASSACHUSETTS TROUT STOCKED WATERS CONNECTICUT VALLEY DISTRICT Daily stocking updates can be viewed at Mass.gov/Trout. All listed waters are stocked in the spring. Bold waters are stocked in spring and fall. AGAWAM: Westfield River GILL: Fall River AMHERST: Adams Brook, Amethyst Brook, GRANBY: Bachelor Brook, Dufresne Farm Pond Cushman Brook, Fort River, Mill River, Puffers Pond GREENFIELD: Fall River, Green River (Factory Hollow Pond) HADLEY: Fort River, Harts Brook, Mill River, USFW BELCHERTOWN: Jabish Brook, Metacomet Lake, Pond Quabbin Reservoir, Scarboro Brook, Swift River HAMPDEN: Scantic River, South Branch Mill River BERNARDSTON: Fall River, Shattuck Brook HATFIELD: Mill River BRIMFIELD: Dean Pond, Foskett Mill Stream,Little Alum Pond, Mill Brook, Quaboag River, Quinebaug HOLLAND: Hamilton Reservoir, Holland Pond, River, Sherman Pond Quinebaug River CHICOPEE: Chicopee Reservoir HOLYOKE: Broad Brook COLRAIN: East Branch North River, Green River, LEVERETT: Doolittle Brook, Roaring Brook, Sawmill North River, West Branch North River River CONWAY: Bear River, Deerfield River, Poland Brook, LEYDEN: Green River, Shattuck Brook South River LUDLOW: Broad Brook, Chapin (Haviland) Pond, DEERFIELD: Deerfield River, Mill River Chicopee River EAST LONGMEADOW: South Branch Mill River MONSON: Chicopee Brook, Chicopee Brook Reservoir, Conant Brook, Quaboag River, Scantic EASTHAMPTON: Broad Brook, Hannum Brook, River Manhan River, Nashawannuck Pond, North Branch Manhan River MONTAGUE: Goddard Brook, Millers River, Sawmill River ERVING: Keyup
    [Show full text]
  • Along the Chicopee River from the Mills to the Ludlow Bridge - Creating a Vision for Indian Orchard Ying Cao University of Massachusetts - Amherst
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Landscape Architecture & Regional Planning Landscape Architecture & Regional Planning Studio and Student Research and Creative Activity Spring 2012 Along the Chicopee River from the Mills to the Ludlow Bridge - Creating a Vision for Indian Orchard Ying Cao University of Massachusetts - Amherst Elizabeth Englebretson University of Massachusetts - Amherst Scott ulF ford University of Massachusetts - Amherst Jing Huang University of Massachusetts - Amherst Yiwei Huang University of Massachusetts - Amherst See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/larp_grad_research Part of the Environmental Design Commons, Landscape Architecture Commons, and the Urban, Community and Regional Planning Commons Cao, Ying; Englebretson, Elizabeth; Fulford, Scott; Huang, Jing; Huang, Yiwei; Liu, Rocky; Murphy, Tracy; Von Plinsky, Sparky; Wang, Albert; Wang, Jinglin; Yan, Yan; and Yu, Shanshan, "Along the Chicopee River from the Mills to the Ludlow Bridge - Creating a Vision for Indian Orchard" (2012). Landscape Architecture & Regional Planning Studio and Student Research and Creative Activity. 25. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/larp_grad_research/25 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Landscape Architecture & Regional Planning at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Landscape Architecture & Regional Planning Studio and Student Research and Creative Activity by an authorized
    [Show full text]
  • Belchertown, MA Waterbody Assessment, 305(B)/303(D), And
    MA34-27_2008 CaldwellCaldwell Brook Brook Fort River (5) MA36-29_2008 Fort River Cadwell Creek (2) New Salem Knights 202 Pelham ThurstonThurston Brook Brook Pond 9 MA36077_2008 Cadwell Creek Knights Pond (2) ScarboroScarboro BrookBrook JabishBrook JabishBrook MontagueBrook MontagueBrook Quabbin Reservoir PlumPlum BrookBrook Hop Brook Baby Carriage Brook Baby Carriage Brook MA34035_2008 Amherst Lake Holland (4c) Arcadia Lake MA34005_2008 Metacomet Arcadia Lake (5) Lake MA34051_2008 Ware Metacomet Lake (5) Jarish Brook Batchelor Brook Peppers Mill MA34-06_2008 Pond Lampson Brook (5) MA34-07_2008 Bachelor Brook (4a) MA36121_2008 Peppers Mill Pond (3) MA34-07_2008 Bachelor Brook (4a) MA34024_2008 Lampson Brook MA36129_2008 Forge Forge Pond (5) Quabbin Reservoir (4a) (TMDL) Pond Weston Brook 9 MA36-09_2008 Swift River (2) MA34-23_2008 Belchertown Beaver Granby Weston Brook (5) Brook 202 MA34037_2008 MA36010_2008 Ingraham Brook Pond (4c) Beaver Lake (4c) JabishJabish CanalCanal Turkey Hill Brook Turkey Hill Brook 21 Swift River MA36-09_2008 Swift River (2) Swift River Roaring Brook StonyBrook StonyBrook Jabish Brook MA36-06_2008 Ware River (5) Swift MA34-19_2008 River Galusza Stream MuddyMuddy BrookBrook Stony Brook (5) Broad Brook Broad Brook 181 Ware River Ware River 32 BroadBroad BrookBrook CanalCanal MA36117_2008 Pattaquattic Pond (2) Muddy MA36-10_2008 Brook Swift River (3) MA36145_2008 Springfield Forest Springfield Reservoir (2) Reservoir Lake Stony MA36014_2008 Brook Bennett Street Pond (3) Second PondBrook Second PondBrook Higher Brook MA36043_2008 MA36063_2008 Forest Lake (4c) Ludlow MA36-10_2008 Swift River (3) Crystal Lake (2) MA36003_2008 HarrisHarris BrookBrook Ware Alden Pond (5) River Notes: MA36-07_2008 Ware River (2) Palmer 1) Adapted from Final Massachusetts Year 2008 Integrated List of Waters; M A 36 -06_ 2008 available at http://www.mass.gov/dep/water/resources/08list2.pdf M A 36 -22_ 2008 M A 36 -07_ 2008 2) Waterbodies shown without an identified category are assigned as Category 3 by definition.
    [Show full text]
  • Toxic Water Pollution in Massachusetts Table 9
    E NVIRONMENTAL Dishonorable W G TM ORKING ROUP Table 9 Discharge Toxic water pollution in Massachusetts Companies reporting toxic discharges to water (1990-1994) City: Athol, Massachusetts Facility: L. S. Starrett Co. Pounds of toxic chemicals discharged to water Chemical discharged Receiving water 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1990-1994 All toxic chemicals 250 20 510 25 15 820 Copper Millers River 5 250 5 5 265 TrichloroethyleneMillers River 250 5 5 260 Manganese Millers River 5 250 5 260 Chromium Millers River 5 5 5 5 20 Toluene Millers River 5 5 10 Dichloromethane Millers River 5 5 City: Attleboro, Massachusetts Facility: Texas Instruments Inc. Pounds of toxic chemicals discharged to water Chemical discharged Receiving water 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1990-1994 All toxic chemicals 2,606 2,260 1,093 1,560 2,024 9,543 AmmoniaCooper's Pond 540 1,090 250 750 1,645 4,275 AmmoniaSpeedway Brook 1,280 750 750 250 46 3,076 Copper compoundsSpeedway Brook 359 31 39 5 250 684 Nickel compounds Cooper's Pond 221 10 250 17 498 Copper compoundsCooper's Pond 64 120 9 250 17 460 NickelSpeedway Brook 250 250 ChromiumSpeedway Brook 77 1 78 Silver compoundsCooper's Pond 1 17 1 19 6 44 Silver compoundsSpeedway Brook 23 1 1 5 30 Cyanide compoundsCooper's Pond 1 5 5 5 12 28 Nickel compounds Speedway Brook 5 5 5 5 20 Chromium compounds Cooper's Pond 5 8 6 19 Chromium compounds Speedway Brook 5 5 5 15 Cyanide compounds Speedway Brook 5 5 5 15 Barium compoundsCooper's Pond 5 1 1 1 5 13 ChromiumCooper's Pond 1 11 12 TrichloroethyleneSpeedway Brook 1 1 2 2 5 11 Barium compounds Speedway Brook 1 5 6 Silver compounds Speedyway Brook 5 5 Nickel Cooper's Pond 4 4 City: Braintree, Massachusetts Facility: Wollaston Alloys Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydroelectric Facilities General Permit (HYDROGP) List Massachusetts Facilities
    ATTACHMENT 1 NPDES - Hydroelectric Facilities General Permit (HYDROGP) List Massachusetts Facilities Facility Name and Facility Location Lat (N) Long (W) Permit Number & ReceivingWater Cosgrove Intake Clinton MAG360001 North Brook trib. 42 23 55 71 41 18 Oakdale Power West Boylston MAG360002 Quinapoxet River 42 23 12 71 48 09 Cobble Mountain Westfield MAG360003 Little River 42 07 1.8 -72 51 52.8 Boatlock Station Holyoke MAG360004 Second Canal(CT) 42 12 41.7 -72 36 8.5 Chemical Station Holyoke MAG360005 Connecticut River 42 11 33.5 -72 36 28.8 Hadley Falls Holyoke MAG360006 Connecticut River 42 12 0.55 -72 35 40.9 Riverside Holyoke MAG360007 Connecticut River 42 12 41.7 -72 35 40.9 Cabot Montague MAG360008 Connecticut River 42 35 15 -72 34 46 Northfield Mountain Northfield MAG360009 Connecticut River 42 36 43 -72 28 41 Turners Falls #1 Montague MAG360010 Connecticut River 42 36 21 -72 33 54 Fife Brook Florida MAG360011 Deerfield River 42 41 5.6 72 58 38.4 Cockwell Florida MAG360012 Deerfield River 42 41 12.5 72 57 43 Sherman Station Rowe MAG360013 Deerfield River 42 43 45 72 55 51.8 Deerfield #2 Conway MAG360014 Deerfield River 42 34 23.6 72 42 26 Deerfield #3 Buckland MAG360015 Deerfield River 42 35 58.1 72 43 59.8 Deerfiled #4 Buckland MAG360016 Deerfield River 42 37 11.2 72 44 15.3 Deerfield #5 Florida MAG360017 Deerfield River 42 41 27.4 72 57 21.9 Gardners Falls Buckland MAG360018 Deerfield River 42 35 29 -72 43 51 Dwight Station Chicopee MAG360019 Chicopee River 42 08 55 -72 38 00 Indian Orchard Indian Orchard MAG360020 Chicopee
    [Show full text]
  • CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN ANADROMOUS FISH RESTORATION: Coordination and Technical Assistance F-100-R-33
    CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN ANADROMOUS FISH RESTORATION: Coordination and Technical Assistance F-100-R-33 Annual Progress Report October 1, 2015 - September 30, 2016 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Connecticut River Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office Kenneth Sprankle, Project Leader 103 East Plumtree Road Sunderland, MA 01375-9138 Executive Summary Federal Aid Project # F-100-R-33 States: Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Hampshire and Vermont Project Title: Connecticut River Basin Anadromous Fish Restoration: Coordination and Technical Assistance Period Covered: October 1, 2015 - September 30, 2016 This annual report provides an opportunity to organize and document, to varying degrees, all work activities conducted by the Connecticut River Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office (CTRFWCO), formerly the Connecticut River Coordinator’s Office, which includes work outside of the Connecticut River basin and activities not funded by this grant. Objectives: Coordinate the Connecticut River Anadromous Fish Restoration Program as a unified effort of State and Federal fishery agencies Provide technical assistance to the fishery agencies and other program cooperators Identify fishery program priorities, design and implement projects to address issues and opportunities, and develop plans Administer several different federal grant programs to address fish habitat, passage, management, and research projects Accomplishments: Program Coordination Organized two Connecticut River Atlantic Salmon Commission (CRASC) and two CRASC Technical Committee meetings
    [Show full text]