The Role of Biotic and Environmental Factors in Spatial and Temporal Variability of Indian River Lagoon Copepod Communities

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Role of Biotic and Environmental Factors in Spatial and Temporal Variability of Indian River Lagoon Copepod Communities The Role of Biotic and Environmental Factors in Spatial and Temporal Variability of Indian River Lagoon Copepod Communities by Hannah G. Kolb B.S. Oceanography Florida Institute of Technology 2011 A thesis submitted to Florida Institute of Technology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Biological Oceanography Department of Ocean Engineering and Sciences Melbourne, Florida December 2016 The Role of Biotic and Environmental Factors in Spatial and Temporal Variability of Indian River Lagoon Copepod Communities A Thesis by Hannah G. Kolb Approved as to style and content by: ____________________________________________________________ Kevin B. Johnson, Ph.D. Associate Professor, Oceanography ____________________________________________________________ John Windsor, Ph.D. Professor Emeritus, Oceanography ____________________________________________________________ Jonathan Shenker, Ph.D. Associate Professor, Biological Sciences ____________________________________________________________ Stephen Wood, Ph.D. Department Head, DOES December 2016 ABSTRACT The Role of Biotic and Environmental Factors in Spatial and Temporal Variability of Indian River Lagoon Copepod Communities by Hannah G. Kolb B.S. Oceanography, Florida Institute of Technology Department of Ocean Engineering and Sciences Major Academic Advisor: Kevin B. Johnson, Ph.D. The role of zooplankton communities as the link between phytoplankton and secondary consumers is dependent on the species make-up of the copepod community. Copepods often dominate zooplankton in numbers and biomass and are frequently the dominant grazers. Species variabilities in behavioral and morphological traits, and seasonal variances in species make-up, have the potential to alter trophic dynamics in planktonic communities. The goal of this study was to identify the driving forces behind copepod community composition and better understand the role of key species in the Northern Indian River Lagoon (N-IRL). Copepods made up 76% of the N-IRL zooplankton community and have average densities of 2.3•104 ± 4.5•103 m-3. Three dominant species, Acartia tonsa, Oithona colcarva, and Parvocalanus crassirostris, make up >95% of the total copepod abundances. The relative dominance of these species shifts spatially iii between sites (p<0.01) and temporally between wet and dry seasons (p<0.05). Likely intrazooplanktonic predators (the chaetognath Sagitta sp., the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi, and larval fish) had no apparent impact on copepod community abundance. Of all abiotic and biotic factors examined, copepod composition was most closely correlated to relative chlorophyll and Secchi depth (R=0.41), both of which were impacted by algal bloom events. Although communities did not display strong seasonality, their densities and composition do seem to be driven from the bottom up. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project would never have been completed without the support of so many people. I first want to thank my advisor Dr. Kevin Johnson for encouraging me down the zooplankton path and for his patience and guidance though the dozens of drafts. Thank you, Dr. John Windsor, for asking hard questions and not always expecting an answer. Thank you, Dr. Jon Shenker, for contributing your expertise to produce this finished product. Thank you, Holly Sweat, for being my field and laboratory partner over the past 3 years and for patiently answering my never- ending questions. Thank you, Bill Battin, for being a friendly face on the bad days and always helping me get the job done. Thank you, Xiao Ma, Angel Seery, Tony Cox, Casey Hederman, and Kate Beckett, for being so willing to spend long days on the water so I could get my samples. Thank you, Xiao Ma and Angel Seery, for your help in the lab with the most boring of tasks. Thank you, Casey Hederman, for making the unreadable readable. Thank you to my sisters Sarah and Rachel for always encouraging me. Most of all, thank you to my parents Roger and Mary Kay Kolb for encouraging my love of nature from the start and for always supporting me in whatever I do. v Table of Contents ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............................................................................................. v LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES ................................................................................. viii Tables ............................................................................................................... viii Figures ................................................................................................................. x INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................1 Community Succession .......................................................................................2 Regulation of Planktonic Populations .................................................................3 Bottom-up Controls ............................................................................................5 Location...............................................................................................................5 METHODS ...................................................................................................................6 Study Site Description .........................................................................................6 Field Methods .....................................................................................................8 Laboratory Processing ........................................................................................9 Analysis ...............................................................................................................9 RESULTS ....................................................................................................................10 Community Make-up ........................................................................................10 vi Wet/Dry Season Variability in the Copepod Community .................................18 Environmental Factors ......................................................................................19 Impact of Algal Blooms on Community Composition .......................................26 Intraplanktonic Predators .................................................................................28 DISCUSSION ..............................................................................................................33 Dominant Species .............................................................................................33 Biotic Factors ....................................................................................................35 Seasonal Patterns in Copepod Communities ...................................................35 Potential Predation Effects ...............................................................................36 Environmental Factors ......................................................................................41 Biotic Versus Abiotic Factors ............................................................................42 Copepod Community Function .........................................................................42 CONCLUSIONS ..........................................................................................................44 REFERENCES .............................................................................................................46 APPENDIX: ................................................................................................................54 Average Densities of Dominant Copepod Species by Season and Year ...........54 vii LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES Tables Table 1. Seasonal presence/absence patterns of occurrence of all copepod species in N-IRL June 2013 to June 2016. Presence classified as the species being observed in >1 sampling during that seasonal period. Seasons were classified as Summer (June-Aug), Autumn (Sept-Nov), Winter (Dec-Feb), Spring (Mar-May). ML=Mosquito Lagoon, TV=Titusville, CV=Cocoa .....................................................13 Table 2. Rankings of abundant copepod species that make up >1% of the copepod community. Average % and mean densities (# m-3) represent biweekly replicated samplings (n=4 reps/site) collected June 2013-June 2016. Species contributing <1% to overall composition were excluded. ....................................................................15 Table 3. ANOSIM and SIMPER analysis of species contributions per wet/dry season. Samples collected biweekly (n=4 reps/site) June 2013-June 2016.). .........18 Table 4. Regression analysis of dominant copepod species of the N-IRL with environmental variables. Replicated samplings (n=4 reps/site) were conducted biweekly June 2013-June 2016 ................................................................................23 Table 5. ANOSIM/SIMPER analysis of species percent contributions under bloom and non-bloom conditions. Densities (# m-3) fourth-root transformed to reduce weight of abundant species. Samples collected June 2013-June 2016. ..................27 viii Table 6. Regression analysis of dominant copepod species (>1%) with biotic factors including other dominant copepod species and commonly occurring planktonic predators. Samples collected biweekly (n=4 reps/site) June 2013-June 2016. .......32 ix Figures Figure
Recommended publications
  • Zootaxa 1285: 1–19 (2006) ISSN 1175-5326 (Print Edition) ZOOTAXA 1285 Copyright © 2006 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (Online Edition)
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Ghent University Academic Bibliography Zootaxa 1285: 1–19 (2006) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA 1285 Copyright © 2006 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) A checklist of the marine Harpacticoida (Copepoda) of the Caribbean Sea EDUARDO SUÁREZ-MORALES1, MARLEEN DE TROCH 2 & FRANK FIERS 3 1El Colegio de la Frontera Sur (ECOSUR), A.P. 424, 77000 Chetumal, Quintana Roo, Mexico; Research Asso- ciate, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Wahington, D.C. E-mail: [email protected] 2Ghent University, Biology Department, Marine Biology Section, Campus Sterre, Krijgslaan 281–S8, B-9000 Gent, Belgium. E-mail: [email protected] 3Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Invertebrate Section, Vautierstraat 29, B-1000, Brussels, Bel- gium. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Recent surveys on the benthic harpacticoids in the northwestern sector of the Caribbean have called attention to the lack of a list of species of this diverse group in this large tropical basin. A first checklist of the Caribbean harpacticoid copepods is provided herein; it is based on records in the literature and on our own data. Records from the adjacent Bahamas zone were also included. This complete list includes 178 species; the species recorded in the Caribbean and the Bahamas belong to 33 families and 94 genera. Overall, the most speciose family was the Miraciidae (27 species), followed by the Laophontidae (21), Tisbidae (17), and Ameiridae (13). Up to 15 harpacticoid families were represented by one or two species only.
    [Show full text]
  • Emergent and Non-Emergent Species of Harpacticoid Copepods Can Be Recognized Morphologically
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 266: 195–200, 2004 Published January 30 Mar Ecol Prog Ser Emergent and non-emergent species of harpacticoid copepods can be recognized morphologically David Thistle*, Linda Sedlacek Department of Oceanography, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306-4320, USA ABSTRACT: Emergence — the active movement of benthic organisms into the water column and back — has consequences for many ecological processes, e.g. benthopelagic coupling. Harpacticoid copepods are conspicuous emergers, but technical challenges have made it difficult to determine which species emerge, impeding the study of the ecology and evolution of the phenomenon. We examined data on harpacticoid emergence from 2 sandy, subtidal sites (~20 m deep) in the northern Gulf of Mexico and found 6 species that always emerged and 2 species that never emerged. An examination of the locomotor appendages revealed that the number of segments in the endopods of pereiopods 2–4 and the number of setae and spines on the distal exopod segments of pereiopods 2–4 can be used to distinguish emergers from non-emergers. We then successfully used these characters to predict the behavior of 3 additional species. Certain morphological differences may therefore allow differentiation of emergers from non-emergers. KEY WORDS: Emergence · Harpacticoid copepods · Continental shelf · Benthopelagic coupling Resale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisher INTRODUCTION What appear to be emergent harpacticoids have been found in such varied environments as sandy The active movement of individual benthic animals beaches, seagrass meadows, mudflats, coral reefs, and from the seabed into the water column and back, the continental shelf; therefore, harpacticoid emer- often with a diel periodicity, is termed ‘emergence’ gence might be widespread.
    [Show full text]
  • Contribution to the Knowledge of Meiobenthic Copepoda (Crustacea) from the Sardinian Coast, Italy
    Arxius de Miscel·lània Zoològica, 16 (2018): 121–133 ISSN: 1698Noli– et0476 al. Contribution to the knowledge of meiobenthic Copepoda (Crustacea) from the Sardinian coast, Italy N. Noli, C. Sbrocca, R. Sandulli, M. Balsamo, F. Semprucci Noli, N., Sbrocca, C., Sandulli, R., Balsamo, M., Semprucci F., 2018. Contribution to the knowledge of meiobenthic Copepoda (Crustacea) from the Sardinian coast, Italy. Arxius de Miscel·lània Zoològica, 16: 121–133. Abstract Contribution to the knowledge of meiobenthic Copepoda (Crustacea) from the Sardinian coast, Italy. Data available on the Italian species of Copepoda Canuelloida Khodami, Vaun MacArthur, Blanco–Bercial and Martínez Arbizu, 2017 and Harpacticoida Sars, 1903 report overall 210 species, but their diversity and biogeography are still poorly investigated. We carried out a faunistic survey along the eastern coast of Sardinia (Ogliastra region) in order to document these taxa in the area. A total of 41 species in 36 genera and 18 families were found. Although many species were identifed as putative, the current Italian checklist was updated with 12 new records of genera and 4 of species. Longipedia coronata Claus, 1862 (Canuelloida), Diosaccus tenuicornis (Claus, 1863), Asellopsis hispida Brady and Robertson, 1873, Wellsopsyllus (intermediopsyllus) intermedius (Scott and Scott, 1895) (all Harpacticoida) are reported for the frst time from Sardinia coasts. The copepod community was particularly rich at Ogliastra Island, a small rocky island with natural reefs, rocky shoals and Posidonia oceanica meadows. Species found there were mainly related to coarse sands and macrophytal detritus. Data published in GBIF (doi:10.15470/dxru6l) Key words: Meiobenthic Copepoda, Meiofauna, Biogeography, Check–list, Sardinia, Italy Resumen Contribución al conocimiento de los copépodos (Crustacea) meiobénticos de la costa de Cerdeña, Italia.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of Zooplankton in Seagrass Ecosystem of Mandapam Coast in Gulf of Mannar
    Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2019) 8(7): 2034-2042 International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences ISSN: 2319-7706 Volume 8 Number 07 (2019) Journal homepage: http://www.ijcmas.com Original Research Article https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2019.807.244 Diversity of Zooplankton in Seagrass Ecosystem of Mandapam Coast in Gulf of Mannar S. Deepika1*, A. Srinivasan1, P. Padmavathy1 and P. Jawahar2 1Department of Aquatic Environment Management 2Department of Fisheries Biology and Resource Management, Fisheries College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Dr. J. Jayalalithaa Fisheries University, Thoothukudi – 628 008. Tamil Nadu, India *Corresponding author ABSTRACT K e yw or ds The present investigation was carried out to assess the distribution of zooplankton in seagrass ecosystem in comparison with that of the coastal waters without seagrasses in Seagrass ecosystem, Gulf of Mannar. Water and plankton samples were collected from the seagrass ecosystem Zooplankton, (Station 1) and the control station without seagrasses (station 2) from September 2016 to Physico chemical parameters, Species May 2017. The physico chemical parameters were analysed and the mean values of composition, surface water temperature, salinity, pH, dissolved oxygen, nitrite, nitrate, phosphate, Species diversity silicate, gross primary productivity and chlorophyll-a were 27.72⁰ C, 34.17 ppt, 7.99, 3.85 -1 -3 -1 -3 index ml.l , 0.25µM, 0.01 µM, 0.63 µM, 1.03 µM, 0.22 mg.C.m .h and 0.24 mg.m respectively. Totally, 59 species of zooplankton were recorded from each of the two Article Info stations with the maximum density of 667400 and 935300 nos.m-3 in station 1 and 2 respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • 159, July 2013
    PSAMMONALIA The Newslettter of the International Association of Meiobenthologists Number 159, July 2013 Composed and Printed at: Hellenic Centre for Marine Research PO Box 2214, 71003 Heraklion, Crete Greece DON'T FORGET TO RENEW YOUR MEMBERSHIP IN IAM! THE APPLICATION CAN BE FOUND AT: http://www.meiofauna.org/appform.html This newsletter is mailed electronically. Paper copies will be sent only upon request. This Newsletter is not part of the scientic literature for taxonomic purposes 1 The International Association of Meiobenthologists Executive Committee Nikolaos Lampadariou Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, PO Box 2214, 71003, Chairperson Heraklion, Crete, Greece [[email protected]] Paulo Santos Department of Zoology, Federal University of Pernambuco, Past Chairperson Recife, PE 50670-420 Brazil [[email protected]] Ann Vanreusel Ghent University, Biology Department, Marine Biology Section, Treasurer Gent, B-9000, Belgium [[email protected]] Jyotsna Sharma Department of Biology, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Assistant Treasurer Antonio, TX 78249-0661, USA [[email protected]] Monika Bright Department of Marine Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, A- (term expires 2013) 1090, Austria [[email protected]] Tom Moens Ghent University, Biology Department, Marine Biology Section, (term expires 2013) Gent, B-9000, Belgium [[email protected]] Vadim Mokievsky P.P. Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of (term expires 2016) Sciences, 36 Nakhimovskiy Prospect, 117218 Moscow, Russia [[email protected]] Walter Traunsburger Bielefeld University, Faculty of Biology, Postfach 10 01 31, (term expires 2016) D-33501 Bielefeld, Germany [[email protected]] Ex-Ocio Executive Committee (Past Chairpersons) 1966-67 Robert Higgins (Founding Editor) 1984-86 Olav Giere 1968-69 W.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Habitat Selectivity of Harpacticoid Copepods from Sea
    Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 2008, 88(3), 515–526. #2008 Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom doi:10.1017/S0025315408000805 Printed in the United Kingdom Diversity and habitat selectivity of harpacticoid copepods from sea grass beds in Pujada Bay, the Philippines marleen de troch1, jenny lynn melgo-ebarle2, lea angsinco-jimenez3, hendrik gheerardyn1 and magda vincx1 1Ghent University, Biology Department, Marine Biology Section, Campus Sterre—Building S8, Krijgslaan 281, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium, 2Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Ecological Marine Management, Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium, 3Davao Oriental State College of Science and Technology (DOSCST), NSM Department, 8200 Mati, Davao Oriental, the Philippines The spatial diversity of meiofauna from sea grass beds of Pujada Bay (the Philippines), was studied with special emphasis on harpacticoid copepods. Sediment cores were obtained from areas adjacent to the different species of sea grasses. Meiofauna was enumerated at higher taxon level and harpacticoid copepods were identified to genus level. Diversity indices were calcu- lated corresponding to the hierarchical levels of spatial biodiversity, i.e. alpha, beta and gamma. Nematodes were the most abundant meiofaunal group in all sediment layers and along the entire tidal gradient (37–92%); harpacticoids were second in abundance (3.0–40.6%) but highly diverse (N0: 9.33–15.5) at the uppermost sediment layer (0–1 cm) near all beds of sea grass species. There was a sharp turnover of harpacticoid genera along the tidal gradient, thus suggesting a relatively low proportion of shared genera among benthic communities in different sea grass zones. The families of Tetragonicipitidae and Miraciidae were the dominant harpacticoid groups occurring in all sediment layers of all sea grass species.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Assessment of the Baltic Sea 2015
    No 102 2016 Biological assessment of the Baltic Sea 2015 Norbert Wasmund, Jörg Dutz, Falk Pollehne, Herbert Siegel and Michael L. Zettler "Meereswissenschaftliche Berichte" veröffentlichen Monographien und Ergebnis- berichte von Mitarbeitern des Leibniz-Instituts für Ostseeforschung Warnemünde und ihren Kooperationspartnern. Die Hefte erscheinen in unregelmäßiger Folge und in fortlaufender Nummerierung. Für den Inhalt sind allein die Autoren verantwortlich. "Marine Science Reports" publishes monographs and data reports written by scien- tists of the Leibniz-Institute for Baltic Sea Research Warnemünde and their co- workers. Volumes are published at irregular intervals and numbered consecutively. The content is entirely in the responsibility of the authors. Schriftleitung: Dr. Norbert Wasmund ([email protected]) Die elektronische Version ist verfügbar unter / The electronic version is available on: http://www.io-warnemuende.de/meereswissenschaftliche-berichte.html © Dieses Werk ist lizenziert unter einer Creative Commons Lizenz CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International. Mit dieser Lizenz sind die Verbreitung und das Teilen erlaubt unter den Bedingungen: Namensnennung - Nicht- kommerziell - Keine Bearbeitung. © This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution which permits to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, but no derivatives and no commercial use is allowed, see: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ISSN 2195-657X Norbert Wasmund1, Jörg Dutz1, Falk Pollehne1, Herbert Siegel1, Michael L. Zettler1: Biological Assessment of the Baltic Sea 2015. Meereswiss. Ber., Warnemünde, 102 (2016) DOI: 10.12754/msr-2016-0102 Adressen der Autoren: 1 Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research (IOW), Seestraße 15, D-18119 Rostock- Warnemünde, Germany E-mail des verantwortlichen Autors: [email protected] 3 Table of contents Page Abstract 4 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Material De Apoyo Informe Anual 2015-2016 Departamento De Ciencias Marinas
    Material de Apoyo Informe Anual 2015-2016 Departamento de Ciencias Marinas 1. Misión UPRM Una de las misiones primordiales del Departamento es la de educación graduada. Tabla 1 Resumen de Matrícula del Departamento de Ciencias Marinas 2015-2016. Descripción 1er Sem. 2do Sem. Solicitudes de Admisión recibidas 12 10 Solicitudes Aceptadas 12 7 Readmisiones 0 0 Traslado Interno 0 0 Total Estudiantes Matriculados 36 MS /18PhD (54) 34 MS /21PhD (55) Total Subgraduados con Ayudantías 2 2 Estudiantes que Defendieron Tesis 3 3 Bajas Totales 1MS y 1PhD (2) 1 (PhD) Grados Aprobados Durante el año Académico 2015-2016 culminaron su grado seis (6) estudiantes del Departamento de Ciencias Marinas. De los cuales tres (3) fueron del programa de Maestría y tres (3) del programa Doctoral. Programa de Maestría Yariela Gumá Cintrón. (MS) Transcriptomic Analysis of Cobalt Stress in the Marine Yeast Debaryomices Hansenii. 4 de diciembre de 2015. Supervisor: Dr. Govind Nadathur. Myrna J. Santiago Torres. (MS) Hurricane Forcing of Phytoplankton Biomass in the Sargasso Sea. 4 de diciembre de 2015. Supervisor: Dr. Roy Armstrong. Phillip Sánchez. (MS) Bioacoustics patio-temporal patterns of Black Grouper, Mycteroperca bonaci, at spawning aggregations in Puerto Rico and Florida. 5 de mayo de 2016. Supervisor: Dr.Richard Appeldoorn. Programa Doctoral Diana M. Beltrán Rodríguez. (PhD) The Scale of Connectivity in Benthic Reef Fishes: The Population Genomics of Opistognathus aurifrons. 4 de diciembre de 2015. Supervisor: Dr.Richard Appeldoorn. Chelsea Ann Harms-Tuohy. (PhD) The management and feeding ecology of the invasive lionfish (Pterois volitans) in Puerto Rico. 29 de abril de 2016. Supervisor: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Paralubbockiidae (Copepoda: Poecilostomatoida)
    Biological Oceanography, Vol. 6, pp. 163-173, 1988/1989 0196-5581188/89 $3.00 + .00 Printed in the UK. All rights reserved. Copyright © 198811989 Thylor & Francis New Family of Deep-Sea Planktonic Copepods, the Paralubbockiidae (Copepoda: Poecilostomatoida) GEOFFREY A. BOXSHALL British Museum (Natural History) Cromwell Road London SW7 5BD England RONYHUYS Marine Biology Section Institute of Zoology State University of Ghent K. L. Ledeganckstraat 35 B-9000 Ghent, Belgium and Delta Institute for Hydrobiological Research Vierstraat 28 4401 EA Yerseke, The Netherlands Abstract The deep-sea planktonic copepod Paralubbockia longipedia is redescribed from the type specimens, and a new family of Poecilostomatoida is proposed to accommodate it. The Paralubbockiidae Jam. nov. is characterized by two unique plesiomorphies, the ventrally located fifth legs and the retention of a separate maxillulary palp, and by the apomorphic states of the endopods of the swimming legs and of the antenna. The sister group of the Paralubbockiidae is identified as the family Oncaeidae. These are the only two poecilostomatoid families that have retained a vestige of the geniculation mechanism in the antennules of the male. The genus Laitmatobius Humes is here regarded as incertae sedis within the lineage comprising the Oncaeidae and the Paralubbockiidae. Keywords Planktonic copepods, deep-sea, Paralubbockiidae fam.nov., Oncaeidae. Introduction Boxshall (1977) has described Paralubbockia, a genus of poecilostomatoid from the deep-water pl~on in the North Atlantic off the Cape Verde Islands. He recognized problems with the familial affinities of the genus but proposed placing it in an emended Oncaeidae, with some reservations because of differences in the structure of the anten- Contribution No.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenomic Analysis of Copepoda (Arthropoda, Crustacea) Reveals Unexpected Similarities with Earlier Proposed Morphological Ph
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Papers from the Nebraska Center for Biotechnology Biotechnology, Center for 1-2017 Phylogenomic analysis of Copepoda (Arthropoda, Crustacea) reveals unexpected similarities with earlier proposed morphological phylogenies Seong-il Eyun University of Nebraska - Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/biotechpapers Part of the Biotechnology Commons, Molecular, Cellular, and Tissue Engineering Commons, Other Genetics and Genomics Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Eyun, Seong-il, "Phylogenomic analysis of Copepoda (Arthropoda, Crustacea) reveals unexpected similarities with earlier proposed morphological phylogenies" (2017). Papers from the Nebraska Center for Biotechnology. 10. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/biotechpapers/10 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Biotechnology, Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Papers from the Nebraska Center for Biotechnology by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Eyun BMC Evolutionary Biology (2017) 17:23 DOI 10.1186/s12862-017-0883-5 RESEARCHARTICLE Open Access Phylogenomic analysis of Copepoda (Arthropoda, Crustacea) reveals unexpected similarities with earlier proposed morphological phylogenies Seong-il Eyun Abstract Background: Copepods play a critical role in marine ecosystems but have been poorly investigated in phylogenetic studies. Morphological evidence supports the monophyly of copepods, whereas interordinal relationships continue to be debated. In particular, the phylogenetic position of the order Harpacticoida is still ambiguous and inconsistent among studies. Until now, a small number of molecular studies have been done using only a limited number or even partial genes and thus there is so far no consensus at the order-level.
    [Show full text]
  • Meiofauna As Food Source for Small-Sized Demersal Fish in The
    Helgol Mar Res (2013) 67:203–218 DOI 10.1007/s10152-012-0316-1 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Meiofauna as food source for small-sized demersal fish in the southern North Sea Sabine Schu¨ckel • Anne F. Sell • Terue C. Kihara • Annemarie Koeppen • Ingrid Kro¨ncke • Henning Reiss Received: 18 December 2011 / Revised: 25 June 2012 / Accepted: 29 June 2012 / Published online: 20 July 2012 Ó Springer-Verlag and AWI 2012 Abstract Meiofauna play an essential role in the diet of occurrence and biomass. Between autumn and spring, the small and juvenile fish. However, it is less well docu- harpacticoid community was characterized by Pseudobra- mented which meiofaunal prey groups in the sediment are dya minor and Halectinosoma canaliculatum, and in eaten by fish. Trophic relationships between five demersal summer by Longipedia coronata. Meiofaunal prey domi- fish species (solenette, goby, scaldfish, dab \20 cm and nated the diets of solenette and gobies in all seasons, plaice \20 cm) and meiofaunal prey were investigated by occurred only seasonally in the diet of scaldfish and dab, means of comparing sediment samples and fish stomach and was completely absent in the diet of plaice. For all fish contents collected seasonally between January 2009 and species (excluding plaice) and in each season, harpactic- January 2010 in the German Bight. In all seasons, meio- oids were the most important meiofauna prey group in fauna in the sediment was numerically dominated by terms of occurrence, abundance and biomass. High values nematodes, whereas harpacticoids dominated in terms of of Ivlev’s index of selectivity for Pseudobradya spp. in winter and Longipedia spp.
    [Show full text]
  • Harpacticoida
    NOAA Technical Report NMFS Circular 399 Marine Flora and Fauna of the Northeastern United States. Copepoda: Harpacticoida Bruce C. Coull March 1977 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Juanita M. Kreps, Secretary National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Robert M. White, Administrator National Marine Fisheries Service Robert W. Schoning, Director For Sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Oflice , Washington, D.C. 20.j.02 • Stock No. 003-020-O{)125-4- I-tv I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I FOREWORD This issue of the "Circulars" is part of a suhseries entitled "Marine Flora and Fauna of the Northeastern United States." This subseries will consist of original, illustrated, modern manuals on the identification, clas$ification, and general biology of the estuarine and coastal marine plants and animals of the northeastern United States. Manuals will be published 'at irregular intervals on as many taxa of the region as there are specialists available to collaborate in their preparation. The manuals are an outgrowth of the widely used "Keys to Marine Invertebrates of the Woods Hole Region," edited by R. 1. Smith, published in 1964, and produced under the auspices of the Systematics-Ecology Program, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Mass. Instead of revising the "Woods Hole Keys," the staff of the Systematics-Ecology Program decided to expand the geographic coverage and bathymetric range and produce the keys in an entirely new set of expanded publications.
    [Show full text]