DOCSLIB.ORG

MIX CONVOS Day 2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MIX CONVOS Day 2 MIX AT DAY 2- SMALL GROUP EXPERIENCE Welcome to the Small Group Discussion Guide for MIX AT. This is the same discussion content that is provided in the CIY Convos app. As you work through this discussion guide, each subtitle directs you how to interact with the content. Some are discussions, choosing someone to read, or even playing a game! The Motto (Read out loud) We’re going to begin our conversation with prayer. We’re going to pray for 3 things: 1. For God to help each of us not be silent but participate in the conversation. Could I get a volunteer to pray for this? 2. For God to help each of us listen and pay attention when others are talking. Could I get a volunteer to pray for this? 3. For God to help each of us be open to His words, even when it seems difficult to trust them. Could I get a volunteer to pray for this? Let’s Pray… Caught! (Discuss with your group) Share a time with the group when you’ve tried to get away with disobeying your parents, but got caught instead. Guilty (Poll your group, have everyone answer) How do you respond when you are caught doing something you shouldn’t? A. I cry B. I get mad C. I deny it D. I run and hide Cry / Mad / Denial / Run and Hide (Read out loud) • It looks like most of us in the group cry when we get caught doing something we shouldn’t. Why? What’s so sad about other people seeing your disobedience? • It looks like most of us in the group get mad when we get caught doing something we shouldn’t. Why? What angers you about other people seeing your disobedience? 01 • It looks like most of us in the group try to deny it when we get caught doing something we shouldn’t. Why? What’s so bad about other people seeing your disobedience that you’d lie to hide it? • It looks like most of us in the group run and hide when we get caught doing something we shouldn’t. Why? What’s so scary about other people seeing your disobedience? Everyone Knows! (Read out loud) Having our sins discovered and known by others is no fun. It can be scary, embarrassing, and shameful. We can only imagine this is how the woman who was caught in adultery felt. She had Jesus on one side of her and the Pharisees on the other, and her sin was known to all of them. And to make matters worse, the Pharisees were planning to STONE HER! For Me or Stone Me? (PLay this with your group) Let’s play a game. I’m going to finish the following statements by reading them out loud. Everyone in the group should decide if they agree or disagree with each statement I make. If you agree with my statement, shout “I’M FOR YOU!” If you disagree with my statement, shout “STONE HIM/HER!” My goal is to try and end each statement so that more people are FOR ME and less want to STONE ME. Statement #1 – The best breakfast cereal in the world is… (ex – Lucky Charms) Statement #2 - The one thing that really grosses me out is… Statement #3 - The worst ice cream flavor is… Statement #4 - The funniest movie ever is… Statement #5 - The best way I can describe school is… Statement #6 - If I had unlimited money, I would buy everyone in this group… Statement #7 - If there’s anything in this world I hate, it’s… Jesus Knows (Discuss with your group) Proverbs 5:21 says “For the ways of a man are before the eyes of the Lord, And He watches all his paths.” This means, just like the woman caught in adultery, Jesus sees and knows every sin you commit. When you picture Jesus seeing your sins, do you picture him saying “I’M FOR YOU” or do you picture him saying “STONE HIM/HER.” Why? 02 Jesus is FOR US! (Read out loud) Even though the Pharisees were holding stones that day, Jesus wasn’t. He didn’t hold stones, he didn’t hold punishment, he didn’t hold anger, and he didn’t hold condemnation. Instead, Jesus held both LOVE and GRACE. The same is true for when He looks at each of us. When Jesus sees the sins that we have committed, he holds both love and grace for us, not condemnation. He is FOR US! Trust Issues (Discuss with your group) Why is it sometimes hard to truly trust and believe that Jesus is FOR US, especially when we know we’ve messed up and sinned? Prayer (Pray with your group) Let’s finish in prayer. I’m going to read the following prayer out loud. Before I do, let’s sit in silence for a few seconds with our eyes closed and picture Jesus sitting in this circle with us. Jesus thank you for our time of discussion. Thank you for speaking to us and showing us what is true. Help us to understand and trust that You are FOR US, even when we’ve been disobedient to You. And help us to follow Your example by also being FOR other people in our lives, even when they don’t seem to be FOR us. 03.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • GOODSPEED MUSICALS TEACHER's INSTRUCTIONAL GUIDE MICHAEL GENNARO Executive Director
    GOODSPEED MUSICALS TEACHER'S INSTRUCTIONAL GUIDE MICHAEL GENNARO Executive Director MICHAEL P. PRICE Founding Director presents Book by MARC ACITO Conceived by TINA MARIE CASAMENTO LIBBY Musical Adaptation by DAVID LIBBY Scenic Design by Costume Design by Lighting Design by Wig & Hair Design by KRISTEN ROBINSON ELIZABETH CAITLIN WARD KEN BILLINGTON MARK ADAM RAMPMEYER Creative Consultiant/Historian Assistant Music Director Arrangements and Original JOHN FRICKE WILLIAM J. THOMAS Orchestrations by DAVID LIBBY Orchestrations by Sound Design by DAN DeLANGE JAY HILTON Production Manager Production Stage Manager Casting by R. GLEN GRUSMARK BRADLEY G. SPACHMAN STUART HOWARD & PAUL HARDT Associate Producer Line Producer General Manager BOB ALWINE DONNA LYNN COOPER HILTON RACHEL J. TISCHLER Music Direction by MICHAEL O'FLAHERTY Choreographed by CHRIS BAILEY Directed by TYNE RAFAELI SEPT 16 - NOV 27, 2016 THE GOODSPEED TABLE OF CONTENTS How To Use the Guides........................................................................................................................................................................4 ABOUT THE SHOW: Show Synopsis..........................................................................................................................................................................5 The Characters..........................................................................................................................................................................7 Meet the Writers......................................................................................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • “Clean Hands” Doctrine
    Announcing the “Clean Hands” Doctrine T. Leigh Anenson, J.D., LL.M, Ph.D.* This Article offers an analysis of the “clean hands” doctrine (unclean hands), a defense that traditionally bars the equitable relief otherwise available in litigation. The doctrine spans every conceivable controversy and effectively eliminates rights. A number of state and federal courts no longer restrict unclean hands to equitable remedies or preserve the substantive version of the defense. It has also been assimilated into statutory law. The defense is additionally reproducing and multiplying into more distinctive doctrines, thus magnifying its impact. Despite its approval in the courts, the equitable defense of unclean hands has been largely disregarded or simply disparaged since the last century. Prior research on unclean hands divided the defense into topical areas of the law. Consistent with this approach, the conclusion reached was that it lacked cohesion and shared properties. This study sees things differently. It offers a common language to help avoid compartmentalization along with a unified framework to provide a more precise way of understanding the defense. Advancing an overarching theory and structure of the defense should better clarify not only when the doctrine should be allowed, but also why it may be applied differently in different circumstances. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 1829 I. PHILOSOPHY OF EQUITY AND UNCLEAN HANDS ...................... 1837 * Copyright © 2018 T. Leigh Anenson. Professor of Business Law, University of Maryland; Associate Director, Center for the Study of Business Ethics, Regulation, and Crime; Of Counsel, Reminger Co., L.P.A; [email protected]. Thanks to the participants in the Discussion Group on the Law of Equity at the 2017 Southeastern Association of Law Schools Annual Conference, the 2017 International Academy of Legal Studies in Business Annual Conference, and the 2018 Pacific Southwest Academy of Legal Studies in Business Annual Conference.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethical Bedrock Under a Changing Negotiation Landscape Kevin Gibson Marquette University, [email protected]
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Philosophy Faculty Research and Publications Philosophy, Department of 1-1-2017 Ethical Bedrock Under a Changing Negotiation Landscape Kevin Gibson Marquette University, [email protected] Published version. "Ethical Bedrock Under a Changing Negotiation Landscape," in The Negotiator's Desk Reference / Christopher Honeyman, Andrea Kupfer Schneider, editors Saint Paul, Minn. : DRI Press, [2017]: 493-502. Publisher link. © 2017 DRI Press. Used with permission. -----~------------- ------------------~----.--~~--~~~-~ 03 36 ro The Ethical Bedrock under the Negotiation Landscape Kevin Gibson Editors')\~ " ~vote· }'j d' what's Pas 'bl o~r zlemmas as a negotiator fall into two basic sets, ch~Pters in~. e? and "what's right?" The first is treated by many UJ~ztes about t~ b?ok. Here,from his philosopher's background, Gibson thznk more e zrif[uence ofmorality on negotiations, and how we can should bere cJe?rly ~bout what's the right thing to do. This chapter The .Moralitya .~n coTl)unction with Carrie M enkel-Meadow's chapter on 0 J Compromise. Ethics in N Negot· . egotiation b Iabona ~ckdrop th PProaches and personal attitudes vary widely and against a tnight think ~ promo~es bargaining as optimizing personal gains some 0nlybYth t~ at anythmg goes. However, individuals are constrained not shape oure reshold requirements oflaw but also by personal values that . l'he d. co.nd.uct at the negotiating table. It ProVid Isciphne of philosophy can help negotiators in two ways. First, frarnewo e~ a set of time-tested principles that give us the conceptual benchrna \ and language to assess our actions. Secondly, it gives us or difficu~ s of acceptable behavior, which are particularly useful in novel are a numbcases when the law may give little or no guidance.
    [Show full text]
  • 11-21578 OTI Blum.Qxd
    April 2007 Se Habla Lawsuit? By Edward Blum Though an understanding of English is a requirement for U.S. citizenship, Section 203 of the Voting Rights Act mandates that “language assistance” be available to voters in districts with non-native speaker popula- tions that meet certain criteria. The enforcement of Section 203, however, costs taxpayers tens of thou- sands of dollars, and there is no evidence it helps non-native speakers vote. The experiences of Springfield, Massachusetts, illustrate these problems. “A City of Homes . A City for Business . Springfield, like hundreds of other towns and On the Issues A City Rich with History and Multi-cultural counties around the country, is subject to Section Diversity”—so reads the motto of Springfield, 203 of the Voting Rights Act because, among Massachusetts (pop. 150,000), halfway between many other complex criteria, more than 5 percent New York and Boston. With an ethnic mix of of the city’s population speaks a particular foreign blacks, whites, Hispanics, and others reflected in language. The law requires covered jurisdictions its local government, Springfield, like most of to translate all printed election materials into that New England today, supports liberal Democrats language and provide foreign-language assistance at the polls. In the 2006 election, for instance, at the polls. In its six years in office, the George nearly 70 percent of Springfield voters backed W. Bush administration has filed nineteen law- Deval Patrick, the African-American Demo- suits charging noncompliance with Section 203, cratic nominee for governor. more than were filed in all the years from 1978 to So it must have come as a shock to city 2000 combined.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of the United States
    APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS Opinion of the Seventh Circuit (May 31, 2018) ....................................................la Order of the District Court Illinois (September 29, 2017) ........................................ l0a Order of the Seventh Circuit Denying Petition for Rehearing En Banc (August 6, 2018) ..............18a App.la OPINION OF THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT (MAY 31, 2018) IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT KENNETH MAYLE, Plain tiff-Appellant, V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL., Defendants-Appellees. No. 17-3221 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. No. 17 C 3417—Amy J. St. Eve, Judge. Before: WOOD, Chief Judge, MANION, and ROVNER, Circuit Judges. WOOD, Chief Judge. Kenneth Mayle, an adherent of what he calls non- theistic Satanism, sued the United States and officials from the United States Mint, Department of the Treasury, and Bureau of Engraving and Printing, to enjoin the printing of the national motto, "In God We Trust," on United States currency. The district court dismissed his complaint, and we affirm. App. 2a Mayle asserts that the motto amounts to a gov- ernment endorsement of a "monotheistic concept of God." Because Satanists practice a religion that rejects monotheism, they regard the motto as "an attack on their very right to exist." Possessing and using currency, Mayle complains, forces him (and his fellow Satanists) to affirm and spread a religious message "committed to the very opposite ideals that he es- pouses." In addition, Mayle characterizes the printing of the motto as a form of discrimination against adher- ents to minority religions because it favors practition- ers of monotheistic religions.
    [Show full text]
  • Fraudulent Financial Reporting Practices: Case Study of Satyam Computer Limited
    Madan Lal Bhasin, / Journal of Economics, Marketing, and Management 4(3), pp.12-24. ISSN: 2288-7709 © 2016 EABEA. http://www.icma.or.kr doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13106/jemm.2016.vol4.no3.12 Fraudulent Financial Reporting Practices: Case Study of Satyam Computer Limited Madan Lal Bhasin Professor, School of Accountancy, College of Business, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Kedah Darul Aman, Malaysia. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Fraudulent financial reporting practices can have significant consequences for organizations and all stakeholders, as well as, for public confidence in the capital and security markets. In fact, comprehensive, accurate and reliable financial reporting is the bedrock upon which our markets are based. Keen to project a rosy picture of the Satyam to investors, employees and analysts, Mr. Raju (CEO and Chairman) fudged the account books so that it appeared to be a far bigger enterprise, with high profits and fast growth rate, than it actually was. The Satyam fraud has shattered the dreams of different categories of investors, shocked the government and regulators alike, and led to questioning of the accounting practices of statutory auditors and corporate governance norms in India. This is an exploratory study based on secondary sources of information. An attempt has been made to provide an explanation for various intriguing questions about Satyam scam. After thorough investigations by the CBI and SEBI, they have unveiled the methodology by which Satyam fraud was engineered. Finally, we recommend “Fraudulent reporting practices should be considered as a serious crime, and accounting bodies, courts and other regulatory authorities in India need to adopt very strict punitive measures to stop such unethical practices.” Keywords: Fraudulent Financial Reporting Practices, Satyam Computer, Modus-Operandi, Financial Statements, Corporate Governance, Auditors, Forensic Accounting, Corporate Culture and Ethics, SEBI, SFIO, CID, India.
    [Show full text]
  • State Flags-Part II
    The Little Bird© A Twice-Weekly Newsletter For Curious Seniors Nancy A. Franks, Editor Topic: State Flags - Part II “Where’d you hear that?” “The Little Bird© told me!” Arkansas Iowa Florida Source: (Photo usflagstore.com) (Photo Source: usflagstore.com) (Photo Source: usflagstore.com) When the Pine Bluff, Arkansas It’s no coincidence that the flag of Iowa In 1985, revisions were made to the chapter of the Daughters of The resembles the flag of France. When seal that had appeared on the Florida American Revolution (DAR) wanted designing the flag, Dixie Cornell state flag since 1900. A palmetto tree to present a state flag to the newly Gebhardt wanted to honor the French replaced a cocoa tree. Mountains were commissioned USS Arkansas in 1911, Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte and the taken away to reflect the flat land of there was a big problem. The state state’s strong connection to France. the state. The headdress on the Native didn’t have an official flag. At the All of the land that would become the American woman was removed to urging of the DAR, the Secretary Of state of Iowa was sold to Thomas accurately depict Seminole traditions. State held a contest. The committee Jefferson by Napoleon during the The Florida flag is one of just three chose a design submitted by Louisiana Purchase. Dixie’s flag was flags that include the words, In God schoolteacher Willie Kavanaugh adopted in May 1917. The governor We Trust. The other two are the flags Hooker. On a rectangular field of red, called Dixie, “Iowa’s Betsy Ross”.
    [Show full text]
  • The Capital Journal"
    WEDXKSDA V K V K V I X funur nq Manas Miir.li 10. vnr,. Editorial Page of "The Capital Journal" SALEM, OBEOON, BT amount- PUBLISHED EVERY EVENING EXCEPT SUNDAY, House of Commons, that the British losses to date TMSONTHRIFT ed to 104,000 men. constant How They Got Ahead. Capital Journal Ptg. Co., Inc. In the past two months there has been almost "Capital made only by the process fighting, but no figures for the appalling losses are forth- of earning and saving." Albert V. Atwood. coming. Some of our renders hnve asked us to The losses at sea have hardly been noted, but really publish more stories of the nctunl suc- SUBSCRIPTION BATES Following are Per month... 45e war cess of thrifty persons. Dailr by carrier, per year 5.0(J more ships have been destroyed than in any previous three new ones that have come to our Ar- Bu jUe since the battle of Lepanto was fought and the great knowledge: Weekly by mail, per year mntl" A st. I.uuis police sergeant, during mada was shattered. .'!5 years on the foree, with a salary FULL I.EA8EP AVI BE TELEGRAPH REPORT When the war closes Europe will be as was Egypt, on never more than $115 a month, saved $20,000, and invested in renl estate '" carrier boy. ar. Instruct! to put tie papera on the on which not a house in The Capital Journal the that dreadful mornine there was which yielded him an income of $15.'l a carrier do, not do UiU, mlaae.
    [Show full text]
  • Boisi Center Interviews No
    the boisi center interviews no. 3: October 18, 2006 michael newdow is a lawyer, physician and First Amendment activist whose legal challenge to the words “under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance reached the Supreme Court in 2004. He spoke with Boisi Center associate director Erik Owens before participating in a panel on religious freedom and the pledge of allegiance. owens: What do you think is the owens: Do you think it’s appropriate to say what is a correct religious view. That’s function of a pledge of allegiance—not use the pledge in naturalization cere- my objection to the words “under God” just the American version, but a pledge of monies or VFW meetings or other such appearing in the pledge. allegiance as such? gatherings? owens: Was your legal challenge to the newdow: The function of a pledge, I school policy of the pledge or was it to the think, is to get people to respect their pledge as such? form of government. Now, I’m not a big newdow: The challenge was to the pledger; I’m not into group-speak. But I pledge as such—to the idea that the accept the fact that we have a pledge, and government of the United States essen- I have no objections to it except for the tially says there is a God. If you say we two words “under God.” are “under God,” it implies there’s a God. owens: It seems to me that this pledge Because I’m an atheist, that turns me is a form of civic education to conform into a second-class citizen, and it perpet- people’s ideas of what America ought uates the animus against atheists that I to be or what we are as citizens.
    [Show full text]
  • The Following Remarks Were Delivered to the Staff of the Texas State
    The following remarks were delivered to the staff of the Texas State Library and Archives Commission on the occasion of the second Learning Engagement Opportunities Day, November 8, 2019. Nor Is This All The Spirit of the Texas State Library and Archives Introduction--Motto Do you remember your senior year in high school? What about the little saying or motto you contributed to the yearbook with your picture? In my wife’s and my senior yearbooks, I found this variety with advice, reflection, philosophy: One, never let your parents get the upper hand. I had the world on a string. .until I woke up. No one knows the value of victory better than the one who has suffered defeat And, perhaps the one that both tickles and perplexes me the most: Yes, dear. Not just high school seniors, but public entities these days need a motto—that is: “a phrase meant to formally summarize the agency’s general motivation or intention” Of the mottos of the 174-plus Texas state agencies in the TRAIL list on your website, some are just lengthy, grinding mission statements. Some are brief maxims designed to capture the imagination. Perhaps the motto heard most frequently in these parts is: UT-Austin’s: What starts here changes the world. So, do you know the TSLA agency motto—the one on the website? Maybe you think it is or should be “Yes, dear.” No, that’s not it. It is: “preserving yesterday, informing today and inspiring tomorrow.” Yes, that’s good. But in studying the first century and a half of the TSLA history, I found that the agency has an informal motto that predates even the 1909 enactment of the statute under which the agency functions today, 110 years later.
    [Show full text]
  • Equality Before the Law”: Thoughts on the Origin of Nebraska’S State Motto
    “Equality Before the Law”: Thoughts on the Origin of Nebraska’s State Motto (Article begins on second page below.) This article is copyrighted by History Nebraska (formerly the Nebraska State Historical Society). You may download it for your personal use. For permission to re-use materials, or for photo ordering information, see: https://history.nebraska.gov/publications/re-use-nshs-materials Learn more about Nebraska History (and search articles) here: https://history.nebraska.gov/publications/nebraska-history-magazine History Nebraska members receive four issues of Nebraska History annually: https://history.nebraska.gov/get-involved/membership Full Citation: James E. Potter, “‘Equality Before the Law’: Thoughts on the Origin of Nebraska’s State Motto,” Nebraska History 91 (2010): 116-121. URL: https://history.nebraska.gov/sites/history.nebraska.gov/files/doc/publications/NH2010Motto.pdf Article Summary: Nebraska gained statehood in 1867 only after agreeing to accept Congress’s demand that it remove a “whites only” voting restriction from its state constitution. The state motto “Equality Before the Law” reflected Nebraska’s willingness to extend suffrage to black Americans. Cataloging Information: Names: David Butler, Isaac Wiles, Andrew Jackson Place Names: Plattsmouth, Nebraska; Nebraska City, Nebraska Keywords: Nebraska state motto, Nebraska state seal, “Equality Before the Law,” statehood, Nebraska HR 41, Fourteenth Amendment, Fifteenth Amendment, African Americans, suffrage Photographs / Images: Nebraska state seal; state motto inscribed near the north entrance to the State Capitol; sidebar: quotes from Omaha Weekly Herald reporting on the passage of Nebraska’s statehood bill (February 15, 1867) Date: 1/24/2019 The Nebraska State Seal, featuring the state motto, “Equality Before the Law.” “EQUALITY BEFORE THE Law”: Thoughts on the Origin of Nebraska’s State Motto B Y J A M E S E.
    [Show full text]
  • “Ship, Shipmates, Self” Christopher J
    The oyage Paul Cuffee School A Maritime CharterV School for Providence Youth Spring/Summer 2015 Vol. 13 Issue 2 “Ship, Shipmates, Self” Christopher J. Haskins, Head of School HIP , SHIPMATES , SELF . This is the motto of the tall ship Mystic, a vessel on which the Class of 2015 spent three nights at the start S of the school year. It’s another way of stating the Paul Cuffee School expectations taught to students as early as kindergarten: I take care of my school. I take care of my community. I take care of myself. A sense of community, adventure, academic learning, social and emotional growth, and supportive relationships combine to make the school a special place in each of our three campuses. Mr. Haskins bids Bon Voyage to sea-faring seniors aboard the schooner, “Mystic.” My first year as Head of School has been very challenging and immensely rewarding. As I write this, I smile thinking about the Commencement Celebration for the Class of 2015 and, the following morning, families of new kindergarten students entering the school for the first time. Many of our students will learn and grow throughout their entire 13 years of public education at Paul Cuffee School. We have a tremendous responsibility and the incredible opportunity to transform lives through our unique school model. Being one school across three campuses can present some challenges. Teachers working in different buildings see each other with less frequency. Siblings across campuses can feel like they’re in different schools. Yet, the school buildings have much more in common than differences.
    [Show full text]