2019 PNWS-AWWA Conference Biological Filtration – Benefits and Challenges Lynn Williams Stephens, PE Agenda
• Background on biofiltration • How to develop a Filter Management Plan • Pilot testing case studies • Toronto: cold weather biological filtration • Lake Oswego: surface water treatment pilot
Brown and Caldwell 2 Biological Filtration Definition
Biological treatment within a filter at a drinking water treatment facility is an operational practice of managing, maintaining, and promoting biological activity on granular media in the filter to enhance the removal of organic and inorganic constituents before treated water is introduced into the distribution system.
2016 AWWA Biological Drinking Water Treatment Committee Slow Sand Biological Filtration
• Historically, biological filtration around for 100’s of years via slow sand filtration • Biofilm layer “Schmutzdecke”
• Relies on microbial activity of bacteria to degrade contaminants
Brown and Caldwell Example of Slow Sand Filtration 4 Current Practices with Rapid Rate Biofiltration Practices
300 15 Facilities with capacity >100 MGD
250
200 7 Facilities with capacity of 50-100 MGD 150
16 Facilities with capacity of
100 10-50 MGD Capacity (MGD) Capacity
50
0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 Facilities Source: WRF 4459 – Development of a Biofiltration Knowledge Base Overview of Ozonation and Biofiltration
+ O3 =
Brown and Caldwell 6 Overview of Ozonation and Biofiltration
+ O3 =
Cl2
Brown and Caldwell 7 Microbial Oxidation – How does it work?
• Based on redox chemistry • Surface water and groundwater condition
Carbon Source: DOC, etc.
02: -4 charge
C6H12O6 + 6 O2 → 6 CO2 + 6 H2O
Brown and Caldwell 8 Microbial Oxidation – Removal of Nitrate and Perchlorate • Based on redox chemistry • Typically surface water or groundwater condition
- NH3 O2 NHNO32
NH3 : +1 charge
- 4NH3 + 7O2 →4NO2 + 6H2O
Brown and Caldwell 9 Application and Benefits • Application • Surface and groundwater • Aerobic and anoxic • Organics – T&O compounds, AOC, DOC, CECs, DBP reduction • Inorganics - ammonia, nitrate, nitrite, iron, manganese, arsenic, perchlorate, selenium • Benefits • Removal of multiple contaminants • Biostability of DWDS • Minimal chemical addition • Minimal energy addition • No waste products Removal of Contaminants by Biofiltration using Inert Media
High Moderate Low >85% 50-85% 15-50% 0-15% Benzo[a]pyrene Acetaminophen Caffeine Atenolol DDT Aldicarb DEET Carbamazepine Fluoxetine Chlorobenzene Erythromycin Meprobamate Formaldehyde Clofibric Acid Diclofenac Primidone Ibuprofen Dimethoate Gemfibrozil Sucralose Molinate Naproxen Geosmin Sulfamethoxazole P-Toluenesulfonic Phenol MIB TCEP Acid Saxitoxin C2 Triclosan Trimethoprim Trichloromethane Source: Dickenson, E., Wert, E., Verdugo, E., Greenstein, K., Brown, J., Schneider, O., Marfil-Vega, R., Summers, R. S. 2017. Simultaneous Removal of Multiple Contaminants Using Biofiltration. Water Research Foundation 4559.
Brown and Caldwell 11 Engineered Rapid Rate Biofiltration
• Media selection • GAC media to increase surface area for biomass • Deep beds • Pretreatment • Ozonation prior to filtration to promote biological oxidation of contaminants • May add external carbon source and phosphate addition to increase biological growth • Underdrain design • Backwash strategy • Disinfection strategy
Brown and Caldwell 12 Backwashing Options for Biological Filters • Probable backwashing intervals at 24 hours • Simultaneous air and water (collapsed pulsing condition), followed by a standard water fluidization; not found to be detrimental to AOC reduction (many utilities) • Non-chlorinated backwash water (most common) • Chlorinated backwash (some still use) • Chlorine does decrease biomass • BOM removal much less affected • Chlorine in air/water improves initial turbidity spike, improves headloss
Source: Hooper, J. 2015. Monitoring Tools for Biological Filtration. ACE Workshop. Backwashing Strategies by 21 Utilities with Biological Filters
Source: Hooper, J. 2015. Monitoring Tools for Biological Filtration. ACE Workshop. Bacterial population roughly doubled when backwashing with unchlorinated water
Source: Hooper, J. 2015. Monitoring Tools for Biological Filtration. ACE Workshop. What are the concerns/challenges?
• Can have increased headloss due to biomass accumulation • Can have reduced Unit filter run volumes (UFRVs) • Design considerations • Promoting bacteria in drinking water • Blackbox
Brown and Caldwell 16 Steps to Understand Biofiltration
1. Define filter objectives 2. Develop Filter Management Plan 3. Develop baseline 4. Reassess Filter Management Plan
Brown and Caldwell 17 Filtration Monitoring and Control Tools
Control
Filter loading rate/EBCT Backwash timing/ rates Filter run time
Chlorinated vs. unchlorinated backwash Oxidant dose and type (ozone, chlorine, peroxide)
Brown and Caldwell 18 Filtration Monitoring and Control Tools
Control Operational
Filter loading Head loss and rate/EBCT headloss profiling Backwash timing/ Unit filter run rates volumes Filter run time Chlorine demand
Chlorinated vs. unchlorinated Visual inspection backwash Oxidant dose and type (ozone, chlorine, peroxide)
Brown and Caldwell 19 Filtration Monitoring and Control Tools
Control Operational Water Quality
Desired contaminant Filter loading Head loss and removal (organics and/or rate/EBCT headloss profiling inorganics) Backwash timing/ Unit filter run Dissolved oxygen uptake rates volumes Filter run time Chlorine demand Organic specific:
Chlorinated vs. Biodegradable unchlorinated Visual inspection dissolved organic backwash carbon (BDOC) Oxidant dose and Assimilable type (ozone, organic carbon chlorine, peroxide) (AOC) Carboxylic acids Nutrients Temperature
Brown and Caldwell 20 Filtration Monitoring and Control Tools
Control Operational Water Quality Biological
Desired contaminant Filter loading Head loss and Adenosine removal (organics and/or rate/EBCT headloss profiling triphosphate (ATP) inorganics) Backwash timing/ Unit filter run Heterotrophic plate Dissolved oxygen uptake rates volumes counts (HPCs) Filter run time Extracellular polymeric Chlorine demand Organic specific: substances (EPS) Chlorinated vs. Biodegradable Microbial Assessments unchlorinated Visual inspection dissolved organic (i.e. polymerase chain backwash carbon (BDOC) reaction [PCR]) Oxidant dose and Assimilable type (ozone, organic carbon chlorine, peroxide) (AOC) Carboxylic acids Nutrients Temperature
Brown and Caldwell 21 Filter Management Plan
Trouble- Monitoring Tool Normal Operations (Baseline) shooting Headloss Continuously Continuously
UFRV Continuously Continuously Operational
Turbidity and/or particle counts Continuously Continuously
Brown and Caldwell 22 Filter Management Plan
Trouble- Monitoring Tool Normal Operations (Baseline) shooting Headloss Continuously Continuously
UFRV Continuously Continuously Operational
Turbidity and/or particle counts Continuously Continuously
TOC/DOC or UV254 Weekly Daily
Water Quality Temperature Continuously Continuously
Carboxylic acids Monthly Weekly
Brown and Caldwell 23 Filter Management Plan
Trouble- Monitoring Tool Normal Operations (Baseline) shooting Headloss Continuously Continuously
UFRV Continuously Continuously Operational
Turbidity and/or particle counts Continuously Continuously
TOC/DOC or UV254 Weekly Daily
Water Quality Temperature Continuously Continuously
Carboxylic acids Monthly Weekly
Dissolved Oxygen Uptake Continuously Continuously Biological ATP Monthly Weekly
Brown and Caldwell 24 Many Successful Utilities with Low Temperatures
Source: WRF 4459 Case Study: Toronto Pilot Study - Biofiltration in Cold Temperatures
Source: Michael J. McKie, Liz Taylor-Edmonds, Susan Andrews, and Robert Andrews. 2018 Water Quality Technology Conference, Workshop: Implementing Drinking Water Biofiltration in Cold Weather Conditions Lake Ontario
Water Temp
Source: Michael J. McKie, Liz Taylor-Edmonds, Susan Andrews, and Robert Andrews. 2018 Water Quality Technology Conference, Workshop: Implementing Drinking Water Biofiltration in Cold Weather Conditions Toronto Pilot Study
Source: Michael J. McKie, Liz Taylor-Edmonds, Susan Andrews, and Robert Andrews. 2018 Water Quality Technology Conference, Workshop: Implementing Drinking Water Biofiltration in Cold Weather Conditions Cold Temperatures Decrease ATP Levels
Warm Water (>10°C)
Source: Michael J. McKie, Liz Taylor-Edmonds, Susan Andrews, and Robert Andrews. 2018 Water Quality Technology Conference, Workshop: Implementing Drinking Water Biofiltration in Cold Weather Conditions Cold water still achieved good DOC Removals
Warm Water (>10°C)
Source: Michael J. McKie, Liz Taylor-Edmonds, Susan Andrews, and Robert Andrews. 2018 Water Quality Technology Conference, Workshop: Implementing Drinking Water Biofiltration in Cold Weather Conditions Case Study: Lake Oswego-Tigard Water Partnership, Oregon Existing Direct Filtration Plant
Alum, PACl, Lime, PAC, Sodium Hypochlorite Filter Aid Clackamas River Intake Dual Media Filter Washwater
Anthracite Sand FT To Sludge ContactContact BasinsBasins W Lime Lagoons High Service Sodium Hypochlorite Pumps
Carbon Dioxide Clearwell To Distribution • Existing contact basins do not provide System formal flocculation and sedimentation • Seasonal algal taste and odors issue Expansion Treatment Alternative
• Liquid Stream Treatment Process • Ballasted flocculation • Ozonation • Biological filtration
Brown and Caldwell 33 Pilot Plant Configuration
Brown and Caldwell 34 Greatest HPC levels in BAC Filter
100000
10000
1000
100 HPC HPC (CFU/100 mL)
10
1 Existing Anth Filter GAC Filter BAC Filter Anth Filter Filter Productivity
8,000
7,000
6,000 run) - UFRV Target 5,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
Average UFRV (gal/sf UFRV Average 1,000
0 Existing Anth Filter GAC Filter BAC Filter Anth Filter
3.75 gpm/sf 10 gpm/sf 10 gpm/sf 10 gpm/sf Average BDOC Remaining
1.4
1.2
1
0.8
0.6 BDOC(mg/L)
0.4
0.2
0 Raw Existing Anth ACTIFLO Ozonated GAC Filter BAC Filter Anth Filter Filter
Brown and Caldwell 37 DBP SDS Testing Results
90
80
70
60
50 TTHM TTHM Target HAA5 40
HAA5 MCL 30
20 TTHM and HAA5 (ug/L) Potential Formation HAA5 and TTHM
10
0 Existing Anth Filter GAC Filter BAC Filter Anth Filter Eliminating Prechlorination and adding BAC reduces TTHMs
200 PRECHLORINATION REDUCED 180 Elimination of PrechlorinationPRECHLORINATIONandELIMINATED 160 Biological Filtration
140 µg/L)
Distribution System 120 Locations
100 McCool School #68 Madrid Circle 80 #70 Plumeria St. #8 Apra View 60 #24 Portola St
Distribution System TTHM( System Distribution 40
20
0
7/26/2012 9/26/2012 1/26/2014 1/26/2012 2/26/2012 3/26/2012 4/26/2012 5/26/2012 6/26/2012 8/26/2012 1/26/2013 2/26/2013 3/26/2013 4/26/2013 5/26/2013 6/26/2013 7/26/2013 8/26/2013 9/26/2013 2/26/2014 3/26/2014
10/26/2012 11/26/2012 12/26/2012 10/26/2013 11/26/2013 12/26/2013 Summary • Many successful cold water biofiltration plants • From pilot at Lake Oswego WTP, ozonation followed by biological filtration effectively reduced disinfection by-products while achieving effective performance • Non-chlorinated GAC had increased biological activity and improved bed life, but increased headloss • Biological filtration is a process to maximize contaminant removal • Intentional about the biofilter optimization • Develop a Filter Management Plan to increase understanding and to choose monitoring parameters that work for your system Do you want to learn more? • Biological Drinking Water Treatment Committee • Ten State Standards • Anoxic biological treatment • Biologically active filters for surface waters • Aerobic groundwater treatment • Water Research Foundation Biological Filtration Knowledge Area • #4719 – Biofiltration Guidance Manual, expected late 2019/early 2020 Questions? Comments?
Lynn Williams Stephens, P.E. [email protected] (206) 749-2893