DOCSLIB.ORG

Decentralized Exchanges (DEX) with Automated Market Maker (AMM) Protocols

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Decentralized Exchanges (DEX) with Automated Market Maker (AMM) Protocols SoK: Decentralized Exchanges (DEX) with Automated Market Maker (AMM) protocols Jiahua Xu Nazariy Vavryk Krzysztof Paruch Simon Cousaert UCL CBT reNFT Vienna University of Economics and Business UCL CBT Abstract—As an integral part of the Decentralized Finance liquidity providers benefit from asset supply with exchange (DeFi) ecosystem, Automated Market Maker (AMM) based fees from pool users. Furthermore, maintaining the state of Decentralized Exchanges (DEXs) have gained massive traction an order book is computationally expensive, which is costly with the revived interest in blockchain and distributed ledger technology in general. Most prominently, the top six AMMs— given the native price mechanism on the Ethereum blockchain. Uniswap, Balancer, Curve, DODO, Bancor and Sushiswap— While this problem is minimized by keeping the order books hold in aggregate 15 billion USD worth of crypto-assets as off-chain, DEX with AMMs allows for more accessible liq- of March 2021. Instead of matching the buy and sell sides, uidity provision, especially for low-liquid assets. AMMs employ a peer-to-pool method and determine asset Despite apparent advantages such as decentralization, au- price algorithmically through a so-called conservation function. Compared to centralized exchanges, AMMs exhibit the appar- tomation and continuous liquidity, AMMs are often charac- ent advantage of decentralization, automation and continuous terized by high slippage with asset exchange and divergence liquidity. Nonetheless, AMMs typically feature drawbacks such loss with liquidity provision. Throughout the last three years, as high slippage for traders and divergence loss for liquidity new protocols have been introduced to the market one after providers. This work establishes a general AMM framework another with incremental improvements and the attempt to describing the economics and formalizing the system’s state-space representation. We employ our framework to systematically com- tackle different issues which were identified as weak spots pare the top AMM protocols’ mechanics, deriving their slippage in a previous version. and divergence loss functions. We further discuss security and While innovative on certain aspects, the various AMM privacy concerns associated with AMM DEXs, and conduct a protocols generally consist of the same set of composed comprehensive literature review on related work covering both mechanisms to allow for multiple functionalities of the system. DeFi and conventional market microstructure. Index Terms—Decentralized Finance, decentralized exchange, Therefore these systems are structurally similar, and their automated market maker, blockchain, Ethereum main differences lie in parameter choices and/or mechanism adaptations. Describing a class of mechanisms that defines I. INTRODUCTION the characteristics of an AMM allows assessing the differences A. Background of design choices and their impacts on the system to conse- With the revived interest in blockchain and cryptocurrency quently discuss the structural composition of AMMs and make among both the general populace and institutional actors, the statements about their stability for different market conditions. past year has witnessed a surge in crypto trading activity and B. Contributions increasing competition and accelerated development in the Decentralized Finance (DeFi) space. This work establishes a taxonomy of the major components Among all the prominent DeFi applications, Automated of an AMM focusing on stakeholder roles, asset types, mech- Market Makers (AMM) based Decentralized Exchanges anisms, metrics and attack vectors. This framework is used (DEXs) are on the ascendancy, with an aggregate value locked for a comparative analysis of selected projects by comparing exceeding 15 billion USD at the time of writing.1 Different slippage and divergent loss functions of example protocols. arXiv:2103.12732v3 [q-fin.TR] 19 Apr 2021 from order-book based exchanges where the market price This work represents the first systematization of knowledge of an asset is determined by the last matched buy and sell in AMM-based DEXs with deployed protocol examples to the orders, each AMM uses a so-called conservation function that best of our knowledge. determines asset price algorithmically by only allowing the II. AMM PRELIMINARIES exchange rates to move along predefined trajectories which are conditioned upon the quantities of available assets. AMMs This section presents a taxonomy of the main components implement a peer-to-pool method, where liquidity providers across major decentralized exchanges [1]. To guide the fol- contribute assets to liquidity pools while individual users lowing formal definitions, Uniswap can be used as an intuitive exchange assets with a pool containing both the input and example. This protocol allows exchanging two tokens via the the output assets. Exchange users obtain immediate liquidity use of one liquidity pool containing both assets. A constant without having to find an exchange counterparty first, whereas product function is parametrized at the time of pool inception, defining a number that has to hold true as the product of both 1https://defipulse.com/ asset quantities for all future states of the system. This property determines the swap prices as any trade must uphold the B. Assets constant product under updated asset amounts in the pool. The Several distinct sorts of assets are used in AMM protocols liquidity is provided to the pool by liquidity providers, which for operations and governance. One or more assets can fulfil receive a pool share representing their relative contribution to several functionalities; one asset may assume multiple roles. the pool. The trading fee for token swaps is accumulated in a) Risk assets: This is the primary type of asset for which the pool and therefore acts as a reward for liquidity providers. the protocol was designed: to provide liquidity in these assets, Other protocols extend this basic functioning, and their specific to facilitate exchange between them and to allow liquidity components are discussed later in this paper. providers to earn rewards in return for their contribution. Typ- ically many different risk assets are involved in one protocol - A. Actors they have to be whitelisted, compatible with the protocol and fulfil the technical requirements (e.g. ERC202 for most AMMs a) Liquidity provider (LP): A liquidity pool creator is on Ethereum). the first liquidity provider (LP) when deploying a new smart b) Base assets: For some protocols, a trading pair always contract that acts as a liquidity pool with some initial supply of consists of a risk asset and a designated base asset. In the case crypto assets. Other LPs can subsequently increase the pool’s of Bancor, every risk asset is paired with BNT, the protocol’s reserve by adding more of the assets that are contained in the native token with an elastic supply [4]. In their early version, pool. In turn, they receive pool shares proportionate to their Uniswap required every pool to be initiated with ETH as one liquidity contribution as a fraction of the entire pool [2]. LPs of the risk assets making it an obligatory base asset. Many earn transaction fees paid by exchange users. While sometimes protocols, such as Balancer and Curve are managed without a subject to a withdrawal penalty, LPs can freely remove funds designated base asset as they connect two or more risk assets from the pool [3] by surrendering a corresponding amount of directly in the composition of their portfolios. pool shares [2]. c) Pool shares: Also known as “liquidity shares” and The liquidity pool must be initialized with two or more “liquidity provider shares”, pool shares represent ownership different assets for the smart contract to parametrize the in the portfolio of assets within a pool, and are distributed conservation function and set the initial relative prices. Pool to liquidity providers. Shares qualify for the reception of fees creators initialize the pool with quantities that reflect the that are earned in the portfolio whenever a trade occurs. Shares market prices to avoid unnecessary divergence loss. The act can be redeemed at any time to withdraw back the liquidity of liquidity provision or removal updates the value of the initially provided. conservation function invariant(s) (see Section III). Liquidity d) Protocol tokens: Protocol tokens are used to represent providers are also called liquidity miners due to new protocol voting rights in a decision formation process defined in the tokens minted and distributed to them as a reward in addition protocol and are thus also termed “governance tokens”. Pro- to pool shares when they supply funds. Like centralized tocol tokens are typically valuable assets that are sometimes exchanges, an AMM-based DEX can facilitate an initial ex- tradeable even outside of the AMM and can incentivize change offering to supply a new asset through liquidity pool participation. For example, they might be rewarded to liquidity creation. providers in proportion to their liquidity supply. b) Exchange user (Trader): A trader submits an ex- C. Fundamental AMM economics change order to a liquidity pool by specifying the input and output asset and one associated quantity - the smart contract 1) Rewards: AMM protocols often run several reward will automatically calculate the exchange rate based on the schemes, including liquidity reward, staking reward, gover- conservation function and execute the exchange order accord- nance rights, and security reward, distributed to
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CASP) Software-Only, Ledger Agnostic, Platform Agnostic, Crypto Agile Bank-Grade Security for Crypto Assets
    Protect Your Crypto Assets with Unbound’s Crypto Assets Security Platform (CASP) Software-Only, Ledger Agnostic, Platform Agnostic, Crypto Agile Bank-Grade Security for Crypto Assets Mathematically proven security Cryptography is one of the foundational security elements used by guarantee – the key material never organizations to protect sensitive data, transactions, services and identities. exists in the clear throughout its At the core of any cryptography implementation is the management of lifecycle including creation, in-use cryptographic keys and their protection from compromise and misuse. and at-rest With crypto assets, the protection of private keys is top priority, since the Any currency, any ledger, any private key is used to sign each transaction. It is therefore mandatory platform, any client to keep the key secure – not only from compromise, but also from any Programmatically derived malicious usage – as it takes only one fraudulent transaction (i.e. a single sign addresses (BIP 32/44) that are operation, to empty a wallet). cryptographically protected Backed by proven mathematical guarantees of security, Unbound’s Crypto Stronger and more flexible than Asset Security Platform (CASP) provides its customers with a software-only multi-signature – ledger-agnostic support of flexible quorum security platform that is as safe as hardware. With CASP, one can fully manage structures, any number of human the keys’ lifecycle, define cryptographically-based approval policies, while and/or servers, internal and supporting any currency, any ledger, any platform and any client type. external, that are required to sign a transaction Any Currency, Any Ledger, Any Platform Infinite scalability – easily scale capacity when and where it is Traditionally, securing the keys and secrets that guard the organizations’ most needed valuable assets required the use of dedicated hardware, such as hardware Intuitive and easy to use SDK – security modules (HSMs) and smartcards.
    [Show full text]
  • Blockchain and Initial Coin Offerings: Blockchain´S Implications for Crowdfunding
    Blockchain and Initial Coin Offerings: Blockchain´s Implications for Crowdfunding by Laurin Arnold, Martin Brennecke, Patrick Camus, Gilbert Fridgen, Tobias Guggenberger, Sven Radszuwill, Alexander Rieger, Andre Schweizer, Nils Urbach December 2018 in: Business Transformation through Blockchain (Hrsg. Treiblmaier, H., Beck, R.) University of Augsburg, D-86135 Augsburg Visitors: Universitätsstr. 12, 86159 Augsburg Phone: +49 821 598-4801 (Fax: -4899) 843 University of Bayreuth, D-95440 Bayreuth - I Visitors: Wittelsbacherring 10, 95444 Bayreuth W Phone: +49 921 55-4710 (Fax: -844710) www.fim-rc.de Blockchain and Initial Coin Offerings: Blockchain’s Implications for Crowdfunding Abstract Interest in Blockchain technology is growing rapidly and at a global scale. As scrutiny from practitioners and researchers intensifies, various industries and use cases are identified that may benefit from adopting Blockchain. In this context, peer-to-peer (P2P) funding through initial coin offerings (ICOs) is often singled out as one of the most visible and promising use cases. ICOs are novel forms of crowdfunding that collect funds in exchange for so-called Blockchain tokens. These tokens can represent any traditional form of underlying asset and have already been used, among others, to denote shares in a company, user reputations in online systems, deposits of fiat currencies, and balances in cryptocurrency systems. Importantly, ICOs allow for P2P investments without intermediaries. In this chapter, we explain the fundamentals of ICOs, highlight their differences to traditional financing, and analyze their potential impacts on crowdfunding. Keywords Blockchain, Initial Coin Offering, ICO, Distributed Ledger Technology, Crowdfunding, Cryptocurrency, Crypto-token, Use Case Analysis Table of Contents 1. Crowdfunding and Blockchain .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Linking Wallets and Deanonymizing Transactions in the Ripple Network
    Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies ; 2016 (4):436–453 Pedro Moreno-Sanchez*, Muhammad Bilal Zafar, and Aniket Kate* Listening to Whispers of Ripple: Linking Wallets and Deanonymizing Transactions in the Ripple Network Abstract: The decentralized I owe you (IOU) transac- 1 Introduction tion network Ripple is gaining prominence as a fast, low- cost and efficient method for performing same and cross- In recent years, we have observed a rather unexpected currency payments. Ripple keeps track of IOU credit its growth of IOU transaction networks such as Ripple [36, users have granted to their business partners or friends, 40]. Its pseudonymous nature, ability to perform multi- and settles transactions between two connected Ripple currency transactions across the globe in a matter of wallets by appropriately changing credit values on the seconds, and potential to monetize everything [15] re- connecting paths. Similar to cryptocurrencies such as gardless of jurisdiction have been pivotal to their suc- Bitcoin, while the ownership of the wallets is implicitly cess so far. In a transaction network [54, 55, 59] such as pseudonymous in Ripple, IOU credit links and transac- Ripple [10], users express trust in each other in terms tion flows between wallets are publicly available in an on- of I Owe You (IOU) credit they are willing to extend line ledger. In this paper, we present the first thorough each other. This online approach allows transactions in study that analyzes this globally visible log and charac- fiat money, cryptocurrencies (e.g., bitcoin1) and user- terizes the privacy issues with the current Ripple net- defined currencies, and improves on some of the cur- work.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Coin Offerings: Financing Growth with Cryptocurrency Token
    Initial Coin Offerings: Financing Growth with Cryptocurrency Token Sales Sabrina T. Howell, Marina Niessner, and David Yermack⇤ June 21, 2018 Abstract Initial coin offerings (ICOs) are sales of blockchain-based digital tokens associated with specific platforms or assets. Since 2014 ICOs have emerged as a new financing instrument, with some parallels to IPOs, venture capital, and pre-sale crowdfunding. We examine the relationship between issuer characteristics and measures of success, with a focus on liquidity, using 453 ICOs that collectively raise $5.7 billion. We also employ propriety transaction data in a case study of Filecoin, one of the most successful ICOs. We find that liquidity and trading volume are higher when issuers offer voluntary disclosure, credibly commit to the project, and signal quality. s s ss s ss ss ss s ⇤NYU Stern and NBER; Yale SOM; NYU Stern, ECGI and NBER. Email: [email protected]. For helpful comments, we are grateful to Bruno Biais, Darrell Duffie, seminar participants at the OECD Paris Workshop on Digital Financial Assets, Erasmus University, and the Swedish House of Finance. We thank Protocol Labs and particularly Evan Miyazono and Juan Benet for providing data. Sabrina Howell thanks the Kauffman Foundation for financial support. We are also grateful to all of our research assistants, especially Jae Hyung (Fred) Kim. Part of this paper was written while David Yermack was a visiting professor at Erasmus University Rotterdam. 1Introduction Initial coin offerings (ICOs) may be a significant innovation in entrepreneurial finance. In an ICO, a blockchain-based venture raises capital by selling cryptographically secured digital assets, usually called “tokens.” These ventures often resemble the startups that conventionally finance themselves with angel or venture capital (VC) investment, though there are many scams, jokes, and tokens that have nothing to do with a new product or business.
    [Show full text]
  • Review Articles
    review articles DOI:10.1145/3372115 system is designed to achieve common Software weaknesses in cryptocurrencies security goals: transaction integrity and availability in a highly distributed sys- create unique challenges in responsible tem whose participants are incentiv- revelations. ized to cooperate.38 Users interact with the cryptocurrency system via software BY RAINER BÖHME, LISA ECKEY, TYLER MOORE, “wallets” that manage the cryptograph- NEHA NARULA, TIM RUFFING, AND AVIV ZOHAR ic keys associated with the coins of the user. These wallets can reside on a local client machine or be managed by an online service provider. In these appli- cations, authenticating users and Responsible maintaining confidentiality of crypto- graphic key material are the central se- curity goals. Exchanges facilitate trade Vulnerability between cryptocurrencies and between cryptocurrencies and traditional forms of money. Wallets broadcast cryptocur- Disclosure in rency transactions to a network of nodes, which then relay transactions to miners, who in turn validate and group Cryptocurrencies them together into blocks that are ap- pended to the blockchain. Not all cryptocurrency applications revolve around payments. Some crypto- currencies, most notably Ethereum, support “smart contracts” in which general-purpose code can be executed with integrity assurances and recorded DESPITE THE FOCUS on operating in adversarial on the distributed ledger. An explosion of token systems has appeared, in environments, cryptocurrencies have suffered a litany which particular functionality is ex- of security and privacy problems. Sometimes, these pressed and run on top of a cryptocur- rency.12 Here, the promise is that busi- issues are resolved without much fanfare following ness logic can be specified in the smart a disclosure by the individual who found the hole.
    [Show full text]
  • Gold Standard for Passive Income on the Blockchain
    Anchor: Gold Standard for Passive Income on the Blockchain Nicholas Platias, Eui Joon Lee, Marco Di Maggio June 2020 Abstract Despite the proliferation of financial products, DeFi has yet to produce a savings product simple and safe enough to gain mass adoption. The price volatility of most cryptoassets makes staking unfit for the vast majority of consumers. On the other end of the spectrum, the cyclical nature of stablecoin interest rates on DeFi staples like Maker and Compound makes those protocols ill-suited for a household savings product. To address this pressing need we introduce Anchor, a savings protocol on the Terra blockchain that offers yield powered by block rewards of major Proof-of-Stake blockchains. Anchor offers a principal-protected stablecoin savings product that pays depositors a stable interest rate. It achieves this by stabilizing the deposit interest rate with block rewards accruing to assets that are used to borrow stablecoins. Anchor will thus offer DeFi’s benchmark interest rate, determined by the yield of the PoS blockchains with highest demand. Ultimately, we envision Anchor to become the gold standard for passive income on the blockchain. 1 Introduction In the past few years we have witnessed explosive growth in Decentralized Finance (DeFi). We have seen the launch of a wide range of financial applications covering a broad range of use cases, including collateralized lending (Compound), decentralized ex- changes (Uniswap) and prediction markets (Augur). Despite early success and a robust influx of brains and capital, DeFi has yet to produce a simple and convenient savings product with broad appeal outside the world of crypto natives.
    [Show full text]
  • (AAVE), Bancor (BNT) and Synthetix (SNX) Are Launching on Coinbase Pro | by Coinbase | Dec, 2020 | the Coinbase Blog
    12/15/2020 Aave (AAVE), Bancor (BNT) and Synthetix (SNX) are launching on Coinbase Pro | by Coinbase | Dec, 2020 | The Coinbase Blog Aave (AAVE), Bancor (BNT) and Synthetix (SNX) are launching on Coinbase Pro Coinbase Follow Dec 15 · 3 min read Starting Today Monday December 14, transfer AAVE, BNT and SNX into your Coinbase Pro account ahead of trading. Support for AAVE, BNT and SNX will be available in all Coinbase’s supported jurisdictions, with the exception of New York State. Trading will begin on or after 9AM Pacific Time (PT) Tuesday December 15, if liquidity conditions are met. One of the most common requests we receive from customers is to be able to trade more assets on our platform. Per the terms of our listing process, we anticipate supporting https://blog.coinbase.com/aave-aave-bancor-bnt-and-synthetix-snx-are-launching-on-coinbase-pro-67278bcd8192 1/3 12/15/2020 Aave (AAVE), Bancor (BNT) and Synthetix (SNX) are launching on Coinbase Pro | by Coinbase | Dec, 2020 | The Coinbase Blog more assets that meet our standards over time. Most recently we have added trading support for Filecoin (FIL), NuCypher (NU), Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC), Balancer (BAL), Ren (REN), Uniswap (UNI), yearn.finance (YFI), Loopring (LRC), UMA (UMA) Celo (CGLD), Numeraire (NMR), Band (BAND), Compound (COMP), Maker (MKR) and OmiseGo (OMG), along with supporting additional European and UK order books. Coinbase continues to explore support for new digital assets. Starting immediately, we will begin accepting inbound transfers of AAVE, BNT and SNX to Coinbase Pro. Trading will begin on or after 9AM Pacific Time (PT) Tuesday December 15, if liquidity conditions are met.
    [Show full text]
  • Coinbase Explores Crypto ETF (9/6) Coinbase Spoke to Asset Manager Blackrock About Creating a Crypto ETF, Business Insider Reports
    Crypto Week in Review (9/1-9/7) Goldman Sachs CFO Denies Crypto Strategy Shift (9/6) GS CFO Marty Chavez addressed claims from an unsubstantiated report earlier this week that the firm may be delaying previous plans to open a crypto trading desk, calling the report “fake news”. Coinbase Explores Crypto ETF (9/6) Coinbase spoke to asset manager BlackRock about creating a crypto ETF, Business Insider reports. While the current status of the discussions is unclear, BlackRock is said to have “no interest in being a crypto fund issuer,” and SEC approval in the near term remains uncertain. Looking ahead, the Wednesday confirmation of Trump nominee Elad Roisman has the potential to tip the scales towards a more favorable cryptoasset approach. Twitter CEO Comments on Blockchain (9/5) Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey, speaking in a congressional hearing, indicated that blockchain technology could prove useful for “distributed trust and distributed enforcement.” The platform, given its struggles with how best to address fraud, harassment, and other misuse, could be a prime testing ground for decentralized identity solutions. Ripio Facilitates Peer-to-Peer Loans (9/5) Ripio began to facilitate blockchain powered peer-to-peer loans, available to wallet users in Argentina, Mexico, and Brazil. The loans, which utilize the Ripple Credit Network (RCN) token, are funded in RCN and dispensed to users in fiat through a network of local partners. Since all details of the loan and payments are recorded on the Ethereum blockchain, the solution could contribute to wider access to credit for the unbanked. IBM’s Payment Protocol Out of Beta (9/4) Blockchain World Wire, a global blockchain based payments network by IBM, is out of beta, CoinDesk reports.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey on Volatility Fluctuations in the Decentralized Cryptocurrency Financial Assets
    Journal of Risk and Financial Management Review A Survey on Volatility Fluctuations in the Decentralized Cryptocurrency Financial Assets Nikolaos A. Kyriazis Department of Economics, University of Thessaly, 38333 Volos, Greece; [email protected] Abstract: This study is an integrated survey of GARCH methodologies applications on 67 empirical papers that focus on cryptocurrencies. More sophisticated GARCH models are found to better explain the fluctuations in the volatility of cryptocurrencies. The main characteristics and the optimal approaches for modeling returns and volatility of cryptocurrencies are under scrutiny. Moreover, emphasis is placed on interconnectedness and hedging and/or diversifying abilities, measurement of profit-making and risk, efficiency and herding behavior. This leads to fruitful results and sheds light on a broad spectrum of aspects. In-depth analysis is provided of the speculative character of digital currencies and the possibility of improvement of the risk–return trade-off in investors’ portfolios. Overall, it is found that the inclusion of Bitcoin in portfolios with conventional assets could significantly improve the risk–return trade-off of investors’ decisions. Results on whether Bitcoin resembles gold are split. The same is true about whether Bitcoins volatility presents larger reactions to positive or negative shocks. Cryptocurrency markets are found not to be efficient. This study provides a roadmap for researchers and investors as well as authorities. Keywords: decentralized cryptocurrency; Bitcoin; survey; volatility modelling Citation: Kyriazis, Nikolaos A. 2021. A Survey on Volatility Fluctuations in the Decentralized Cryptocurrency Financial Assets. Journal of Risk and 1. Introduction Financial Management 14: 293. The continuing evolution of cryptocurrency markets and exchanges during the last few https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm years has aroused sparkling interest amid academic researchers, monetary policymakers, 14070293 regulators, investors and the financial press.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Topics About Cryptocurrency
    Recent Topics about Cryptocurrency Kyoto University School of Government - graduate program for public policy studies Naoyuki Iwashita Agenda 1. Overview of cryptocurrency market in 2017 2. ICOs' impact on the price of cryptocurrency 3. Cybersecurity issues of cryptocurrency exchange 4. Central Bank Digital Currency 2 1. Overview of cryptocurrency market in 2017 3 GLOBAL BITCOIN NODES DISTRIBUTION 1. United States (2691) 2. China (2047) 3. Germany (1949) 4. France (697) 5. Netherlands (515) 6. United Kingdom (421) 7. Canada (390) 8. Russian Federation (380) 9. n/a (315) 10. Singapore (227) 11. Japan (212) 12. Hong Kong (183) （source）bitnodes.earn.com/ 4 THE BITCOIN BIG BANG A demonstration of our ability to track transactions through entities on the blockchain; the Big Bang shows the emergence of the largest 250 entities on the blockchain, their identity, and interconnectivity. （source）www.elliptic.co 5 Role of Bitcoin nodes 鷲見 拓哉「Bitcoinについて」 https://www.slideshare.net/takuya_sumi/bitcoin-v5 6 7 M. Iwamura et al.,“Can We Stabilize the Price of a Cryptocurrency?: Understanding the Design of Bitcoin and Its Potential to Compete with Central Bank Money”, 2014 8 1,000 1,200 1,400 200 400 600 800 0 （ 2012/11/1 USD 2012/12/1 （ ） source 2013/1/1 2013/2/1 2013/3/1 2013/4/1 キプロス危機 交換価値 利用者数 ） 2013/5/1 blockchain.info 2013/6/1 2013/7/1 2013/8/1 (USD) ( Price Price 万人 2013/9/1 中国人民銀行が金融機関のビットコインの取扱いを禁止 2013/10/1 2013/11/1 ) 2013/12/1 2014/1/1 2014/2/1 2014/3/1 Mt.Gox 2014/4/1 of 2014/5/1 2014/6/1 の破たん 2014/7/1 Bitcoin (2013 2014/8/1 2014/9/1 2014/10/1
    [Show full text]
  • Why Switzerland?
    Welcome to WELCOME TO ONE OF THE WORLD’S LEADING BLOCKCHAIN AND CRYPTOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGY ECOSYSTEMS Why Switzerland? • Best Package • Advanced Regulation • Funding & ICO Hub • Favourable Tax System • Strong Community & Ecosystem • Deep Talent Pool 2 «Switzerland’s decentralized, bottom-up political culture is a Why Switzerland? natural fit for the decentralized, bottom-up blockchain technologies • Deep-seated culture of of the future.» privacy protection, confidentiality and legal certainty • Low taxes and friendly regulation environment • Friendly, accessible, supportive government • Supportive startup ecosystem with world- class service providers • Number 1 in the world for competitiveness and productivity* 3 *WEF Global Competitiveness Report 2016–2017 «World-leading infrastructure Why Switzerland? in telecom, financial services, education, technological • Sophisticated infrastructure innovation.» and educational world- leading and research institutions • Visionary entrepreneurs and cryptographic technology pioneers • Deep pools of capital and world-class engineering talent • Switzerland is in the center of Europe with excellent air, rail and road connections • Vibrant community and fantastic quality of life 4 Advanced Regulation «Today, Switzerland is leading • Over four decades perfectly the establishment of a working self regulating system in the financial sector regulatory environment for a • In general, regulator and digital economy.»* authorities are positive (e.g. new FinTech rules, acceptance of Bitcoins, ID based on Blockchain)
    [Show full text]
  • Can Ethereum Reach 5000 Dollars Update [06-07-2021] So What Bancor Does Is That It Builds Tokens with Smart Contracts Built Inside It
    1 Can Ethereum Reach 5000 Dollars Update [06-07-2021] So what bancor does is that it builds tokens with smart contracts built inside it. While most of the popular tokens can be easily exchanged, the problem arises when you have rare tokens. Since you are buying new tokens, it also means that you are creating new tokens out of nothing, which in turn increases the Supply itself. The audience was then supposed to vote on the option that they felt or knew was to be correct. Ethereum Token CONCLUSION. There s barely a way out, leave alone an easy one, for crypto investors using the platform at the moment. Robinhood gradually introduced Bitcoin and Ethereum trading on the platform at the beginning of 2018. Crypto users now face a nightmare as they are at a dead end. While Robinhood offers its customers exposure to cryptocurrencies, it doesn t have a provision for customers to transfer the assets to a wallet of their choice. We are likely to see major upgrades to the Ethereum network this year, and those can be expected to push the price higher, she said. 62 of panellists also think Ethereum is somewhat threatened by other smart contract blockchains in that Ethereum could lose some of its users. Overall 59 of panellists say it s time to buy Ethereum, 28 say hodl, and just 13 say it s time to sell. Q1 2021 hedge fund letters, conferences and more Keep checking back as we will be updating this post as the conference goes Read More. We re not affiliated with any one institution or outlet, so it s genuine advice from a team of experts who care about helping you find better.
    [Show full text]