World War III Background Guide.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

World War III Background Guide.Pdf Chair’s Letter Dear Delegates, We are delighted to welcome you to the World War III fantasy committee at the third annual Kent School Model United Nations Conference. Your chairs for this committee are Sarah Smith and Nebeeka Saha. This committee deals with the aftermath of a possible World War III. With the way that the United States has interacted with other countries recently, many citizens are concerned of the possibilities of an uprising war with the rising power, China. This is mainly due to the trade war involving the United States and China. As two large and powerful countries, the United States and China seem unlikely to go to war without involving allies. Moreover, not only is the war itself important for this committee, but so is the aftermath. With the shock of a bomb at the White House and the death of key government leaders, delegates will be asked to not only resolve this crisis, but also investigate the origins of this disaster, all the while maintaining their position. Since this committee is mostly fiction, we are here to challenge your critical and creative thinking. We do ask that you thoroughly read through this background guide and further research the position that you have been given. This allows delegates to begin their in depth research on who they will be representing within the our committee’s discussions. Make sure that any notes or information you have on your position are printed beforehand, as no electronics are permitted within the committee room. If you have trouble following anything in the discussion you may ask your dias for help. We encourage questions and curiosity to help further everyone’s understanding of debate. Each delegate is expected to write a one page, double-spaced position paper on how the government should be rebuilt from the very bottom after the bombing and how to investigate the culprit, including who you suspect the bomber to be. We encourage delegates to be creative with this paper! If you have any questions or see any problems within the background guide, please don’t hesitate to contact me, your chairs, or any other member of Kent School Model United Nations. We look forward to hosting you at this year’s conference! Your chairs, Sarah Smith’ 20 [email protected] Nebeeka Saha’ 20 [email protected] Introduction Ten years in the future, the U.S. government takes part in the third World War, thus resulting in an internal stalemate for the last decade. As one of the largest world powers for many decades, the United States felt tensions rise as China grew to prominence. Tensions furthered when the United States entered a trade war with China, one of the largest economies, due to their continued increase in tariffs on the large amount of exported goods. This is a world war, meaning multiple countries around the world are included. This is due to the long history that these countries have in war, where they’ve gained multiple allies and enemies that could be involved if a war actually plays out. The United States has France, England, and Germany on their side. The France and U.S. have maintained a strong relationship since the American Revolution in 1776. The U.S., France and Britain have teamed up together in past wars before, mainly World War II. Germany would possibly join the U.S. in this war due to both countries being largely democratic. China’s side includes North Korea, Russia and Pakistan. North Korea would join China due to China’s large amount of control over North Korea since China is its main trade resource and therefore, it’s North Korea’s source of food. Russia and China have had relations since 1991 and have been seen to be in a mutual partnership. Pakistan and China have been shown to have beneficial relations since 1950. Background Information The year is 2029 and for the past ten years the world has been full of chaos due to World War III. The war first began with conflict among the world powers–United States of America and China. Throughout their long trading history, these two countries caused tensions by raising tariffs on imported goods, which eventually led to a trade war. China boldly decided to cut off all trading ties with the U.S. in 2019 after Trump raised tariffs so high that it cost more to export the goods than what they were receiving. The U.S. was left with a large economic hole. Allies of China include North Korea, Russia, and Pakistan, while the United States is joined by France, England and Germany. Since the U.S. is geographically the farthest away from these other countries, the lowest amount of battles were fought in the States. Battles occurred largely in China and Russia due to their large territory. The U.S. became the forerunner to win this war due to their unique military tactics (the use of Nuclear bombs won’t be used due to an agreement made beforehand between competing countries) The U.S. barred communications between North Korea and China, cutting North Korea off as an ally of China. A treaty was set to be signed in Washington D.C. between President Trump and Xi Jinping, but when Trump and his cabinet waited for the Chinese government to arrive, a bomb sent to the White House left most of the United States executive officials killed or severely wounded. Fortunately, while the White House was bombed, your following positions were away at one of our allies’ countries thanking them for their help in the war. Therefore, you were all saved from the bombing and with all of those in a higher position having been killed or too wounded to hold up their position, you are the next in line to step up during this country’s time of need. Topics for Debate Rebuilding government after bombing - Due to the massive amount of damage that the bomb has on Washington DC the government as been destroyed. The Executive, Legislative, and Judicial Branch have all been killed so what is next? The delegates can chose to keep the United States government the same as it has always been or create a whole new type of government that will help the country and create a quick repair. How to handle citizens - With the country’s fate in your hands you will need to tell citizens what is going on, and even when you delegates don’t know necessarily what happened, you will need to organize the country and make citizens calm again. Delegates should keep in mind that they have full control of all aspects of the United States government and what they do will be heavily watched by the media. The key to allowing these delegates to start discovering who bombed the White House is keeping the citizens out of the way. Discovering who did the bombing - With all that you know from what happened during the war you will have to come to the conclusion of what country bombed the White House. We encourage delegates to think outside the box and take in not only what happened during the war, but other reasons for such bombing of the US government. Delegates should include their theory of who bombed the White House in their position paper, therefore, the delegates should be thinking of this before entering the debate. With this being a crisis committee, the delegates will have a chance to get more information during their debate, which will help them come to this conclusion. Discovering why the bombings occurred - Figuring out who did the bombing is only half the battle, the delegates will then have to understand the reason why. This can be due to the smallest issues that would make the country conflict. Don’t narrow yourself to just the country’s involved in the war, but think about any country and group of people that may have a reason to bomb and destroy the current government. Maintaining Peace - How will the American government change the way it has treated countries like China to ensure another catastrophic war like this will not happen again in the future? Will you decide to enforce harsher laws or leave them alone? Deciding on How to Punish the Bomber - After deciding on who and where the bomber is from you must decide on what approach we should take to make sure they are no longer a threat. War Debt - Who should be responsible for the war debt? Should China and its allies pay for war damage? Unsigned Treaty - With the United States in shambles before the treaty could have been signed to end World War III the war is still ongoing. It is up to the delegates to consider their current involvement in the war. Ending the war would take a lot of pressure off of the U.S., but does the U.S. government still trust China? Defending the government - While you and your fellow cabinet members are deciding your next move in this war, how will you prevent other nations from taking advantage of you? If a state government tries to cause an uproar, how will you keep the country intact? Potential Scenarios - Delegates should take these scenarios into consideration when doing extra research and taking notes on key points that they would like to bring into the debate. - Citizen uproar and inciting political havoc - Outside countries taking advantage of the U.S. lack of governmental structure - U.S. having to deal with all the war damage and repair - Possible ideas on ending the war, such as treaties - China and its allies going against the treaty and possibly bombing the U.S.
Recommended publications
  • Impeachment of Donald J. Trump, President of the United States: Report of the Comm
    IN THE SENATEOF THEUNITED STATES Sitting as a Court of Impeachment Inre IMPEACHMENTOF PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP TRIAL MEMORANDUM OF THEUNITEDSTATES HOUSEOF REPRESENTATIVES IN THE IMPEACHMENTTRIALOF PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP United States House of Representatives AdamB.Schiff JerroldNadler Zoe Lofgren HakeemS.Jeffries Val ButlerDemings Jason Crow Sylvia R.Garcia U.S. House of RepresentativesManagers TABLEOF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................................1 BACKGROUND..............................................................................................................................................9 I. C ONSTITUTIONALG ROUNDSFORP RESIDENTIALI MPEACHMENT....................................................9 II. THE HOUSE’SIMPEACHMENTOF PRESIDENTDONALDJ. TRUMPANDPRESENTATIONOF T HISM ATTERTO THE S ENATE..............................................................................................................12 ARGUMENT...................................................................................................................................................16 I. T HE S ENATES HOULDC ONVICT P RESIDENTT RUMPOF A BUSEOF P OWER..................................16 A. PresidentTrumpExercisedHis OfficialPowerto PressureUkraineintoAidingHis Reelection....................................................................................................................................16 B. PresidentTrumpExercisedOfficialPowerto
    [Show full text]
  • Brief of the Committee on the Judiciary of the United States House of Representatives ______
    USCA Case #19-5331 Document #1820338 Filed: 12/16/2019 Page 1 of 79 [ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR JANUARY 3, 2020] No. 19-5331 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________________ COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY OF THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DONALD F. MCGAHN, II, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:19-cv-2379) (Hon. Ketanji Brown Jackson, District Judge) ____________________ BRIEF OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY OF THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ____________________ Annie L. Owens Douglas N. Letter, General Counsel Joshua A. Geltzer Todd B. Tatelman, Deputy General Counsel Seth Wayne Megan Barbero, Associate General Counsel Josephine Morse, Associate General Counsel INSTITUTE FOR Adam A. Grogg, Assistant General Counsel CONSTITUTIONAL ADVOCACY William E. Havemann, Assistant General Counsel AND PROTECTION Jonathan B. Schwartz, Attorney Georgetown University Law Center 600 New Jersey Avenue NW OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL Washington, D.C. 20001 U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES (202) 662-9042 219 Cannon House Office Building [email protected] Washington, D.C. 20515 (202) 225-9700 [email protected] USCA Case #19-5331 Document #1820338 Filed: 12/16/2019 Page 2 of 79 CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS, AND RELATED CASES Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 28(a)(1), the undersigned counsel certifies as follows: A. Parties and Amici Plaintiff-appellee is the United States House of Representatives Committee on the Judiciary. Defendant-appellant is Donald F. McGahn, II. James M. Murray has filed a motion for leave to participate as an amicus on appeal.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT of MARYLAND Rami Khaled El Ali, Et Al., Plaintiffs, V. Matthew Whitaker, Et Al., Defenda
    Case 8:18-cv-02415-PX Document 67 Filed 06/11/20 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND ) Rami Khaled El Ali, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) Case No. 8:18-cv-02415-PX v. ) ) JOINT STATUS REPORT Matthew Whitaker, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) The Parties respectfully provide this Joint Status Report, as ordered by the Court at the May 22, 2020 virtual hearing. At that hearing, the Court indicated that it may need to better “understand[] how . the Watch List Advisory Council [WLAC] works” in order to assess the question of Plaintiffs’ standing to sue some of the defendants.1 Hearing Tr. at 9:6-9. It consequently ordered the parties to meet and confer regarding the parties “respective positions for expedited targeted discovery on standing in advance of merits-based discovery. (Dkt. 66). The parties have now met and conferred with respect to their positions on holding an evidentiary hearing (whether virtually or in person), or targeted jurisdictional discovery. Finding themselves unable to reach agreement, the Parties set forth their respective positions as follows: Plaintiffs’ Position: Plaintiffs believe an evidentiary hearing would be illuminating for the Court, but given the federal government’s propensity to mislead the public and courts about their watchlisting system, a hearing would be most useful if it followed targeted, adversarial discovery. Without this discovery, Defendants may be able to avoid liability for their actions by using national security nondisclosure as both a sword and shield or otherwise misstate how their watchlisting system 1 Defendants do not contest Plaintiffs’ standing against many Defendants.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—House H7561
    December 8, 2016 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE H7561 pick up a butter knife or something In closing this out, Mr. Speaker, I GENERAL LEAVE and fix him up right there on the spot. would like to say that Indiana has pro- Mr. ROKITA. Mr. Speaker, I ask b 1600 duced no shortage of great statesmen, unanimous consent that all Members as we reflected on this last half hour, It is a really humorous story that I have 5 legislative days to revise and ex- and Senator DAN COATS has indis- tend their remarks on the subject of enjoy his telling every time we are to- putably joined their ranks after dec- gether at an event. Senator COATS has this Special Order. ades of service to both our State and to The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there a great sense of humor. While his time our country. My own history with Sen- in the Senate has come to an end, I am objection to the request of the gen- ator COATS goes way back to when I also confident he will continue to be a tleman from Indiana? was an intern in his Senate office. If he There was no objection. voice and an advocate for the issues he were on this floor today, Mr. Speaker, f cares about most. Our State and our I am sure he would say that I was one country are lucky to have benefited of the worst interns he ever had. None- MESSAGE FROM THE SENATE from the service of a great man like theless, he started my career in poli- A message from the Senate by Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Opening Statement Tuesday, January 29, 2019
    Remarks as prepared for delivery by The Honorable Dan Coats Director of National Intelligence Annual Threat Assessment Opening Statement Tuesday, January 29, 2019 Chairman Burr, Vice-Chairman Warner, and Members of the Committee... I am here today, along with leaders of the Intelligence Community, to provide you an overview of the national security threats facing our nation. But before I do, I would like to acknowledge the hard work and dedication of the men and women that make up the Intelligence Community. Their efforts rarely receive public recognition because of the nature of the work that they do. But their unheralded contributions play a critical role in the national security of our great nation, and I am proud to represent them. 1 Annual Threat Assessment, January 29, 2019 I also want to express on behalf of the entire IC our appreciation to the members of this committee. The Intelligence Community appreciates your support and values our partnership. [PAUSE] My goal today is to responsibly convey to you and the American people, in this unclassified hearing, the true nature of the threat environment without overstating some of the more significant challenges we currently face and expect to contend with in the coming year… In the interest of time, I also would refer you to my Statement for the Record for a more complete threat picture. As I stated in my recent remarks during the release of the National Intelligence Strategy, we face significant changes in the domestic and global 2 Annual Threat Assessment, January 29, 2019 environment that have resulted in an increasingly complex and uncertain world, and we must be ready to meet 21st century challenges and recognize emerging threats.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Hearing: Nomination of Gina Haspel to Be the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency
    S. HRG. 115–302 OPEN HEARING: NOMINATION OF GINA HASPEL TO BE THE DIRECTOR OF THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY HEARING BEFORE THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE OF THE UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION WEDNESDAY, MAY 9, 2018 Printed for the use of the Select Committee on Intelligence ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.govinfo.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 30–119 PDF WASHINGTON : 2018 VerDate Sep 11 2014 14:25 Aug 20, 2018 Jkt 030925 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 C:\DOCS\30119.TXT SHAUN LAP51NQ082 with DISTILLER SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE [Established by S. Res. 400, 94th Cong., 2d Sess.] RICHARD BURR, North Carolina, Chairman MARK R. WARNER, Virginia, Vice Chairman JAMES E. RISCH, Idaho DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California MARCO RUBIO, Florida RON WYDEN, Oregon SUSAN COLLINS, Maine MARTIN HEINRICH, New Mexico ROY BLUNT, Missouri ANGUS KING, Maine JAMES LANKFORD, Oklahoma JOE MANCHIN III, West Virginia TOM COTTON, Arkansas KAMALA HARRIS, California JOHN CORNYN, Texas MITCH MCCONNELL, Kentucky, Ex Officio CHUCK SCHUMER, New York, Ex Officio JOHN MCCAIN, Arizona, Ex Officio JACK REED, Rhode Island, Ex Officio CHRIS JOYNER, Staff Director MICHAEL CASEY, Minority Staff Director KELSEY STROUD BAILEY, Chief Clerk (II) VerDate Sep 11 2014 14:25 Aug 20, 2018 Jkt 030925 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 C:\DOCS\30119.TXT SHAUN LAP51NQ082 with DISTILLER CONTENTS MAY 9, 2018 OPENING STATEMENTS Burr, Hon. Richard, Chairman, a U.S. Senator from North Carolina ................ 1 Warner, Mark R., Vice Chairman, a U.S. Senator from Virginia ........................ 3 WITNESSES Chambliss, Saxby, former U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Let Trump Be Trump : the Inside Story of His Rise to the Presidency Pdf, Epub, Ebook
    LET TRUMP BE TRUMP : THE INSIDE STORY OF HIS RISE TO THE PRESIDENCY PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Corey R. Lewandowski | 296 pages | 05 Dec 2017 | Center Street | 9781546083306 | English | none Let Trump Be Trump : The Inside Story of His Rise to the Presidency PDF Book About this product. The rate on that mortgage increased to 4. Investors Bank agreed to extend the mortgage on Trump Park Avenue, a condo building at the corner of 59th Street, by a year to , according to his latest financial disclosure, released hours after he left office. Residential property owners have yet to face similar levels of distress. Error loading page. He said the new F will have the biggest impact on Ford's financials starting in the second quarter of Hailing from colonial Virginia, George Washington proved himself a leader and military tactician in the American Revolutionary War. Thomas Jefferson was a well-known figure in the new American government. I gave it a chance but dear god you have to have extra chromosomes to enjoy this read. Name Required. Bush would invoke them. Bossie and Corey R. Corey Lewandowski and Dave Bossie take you deep inside the phenomenal Trump campaign. James Madison helped draft the Constitution and Bill of Rights, and also helped Jefferson found the Democratic-Republican party in A great read. Nevertheless, just as words of division can be used to poison the proverbial well; words of unity, hope and purpose can help clear and purify the miasma. His parting gift to America will be one last constitutional crisis. You've reached the maximum number of titles you can currently recommend for purchase.
    [Show full text]
  • Intelligence Community Presidentially Appointed Senate Confirmed Officials (PAS) During the Administrations of Presidents George W
    Intelligence Community Presidentially Appointed Senate Confirmed Officials (PAS) During the Administrations of Presidents George W. Bush, Barack H. Obama, and Donald J. Trump: In Brief May 24, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46798 Intelligence Community Presidentially Appointed Senate Confirmed Officials (PAS) Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Methodology ................................................................................................................................... 2 Tables Table 1. George W. Bush Administration-era Nominees for IC PAS Positions............................... 2 Table 2. Obama Administration-era Nominees for IC PAS Positions ............................................. 5 Table 3. Trump Administration Nominees for IC PAS Positions .................................................... 7 Contacts Author Information ........................................................................................................................ 10 Congressional Research Service Intelligence Community Presidentially Appointed Senate Confirmed Officials (PAS) Introduction This report provides three tables that list the names of those who have served in presidentially appointed, Senate-confirmed (PAS) positions in the Intelligence Community (IC) during the last twenty years. It provides a comparative perspective of both those holding IC PAS positions who have
    [Show full text]
  • Case 1:18-Cv-02849-ELH Document 6 Filed 11/13/18 Page 1 of 4
    Case 1:18-cv-02849-ELH Document 6 Filed 11/13/18 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND STATE OF MARYLAND, * Plaintiff, * v. Case No.: 1:18-cv-02849-ELH * UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., * Defendant. * * * * * * * * * * * * * PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, TO SUBSTITUTE DEFENDANT, AND TO EXPEDITE CONSIDERATION OF THESE MATTERS Plaintiff, the State of Maryland, hereby moves for a preliminary injunction as set forth below and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction. Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a). Plaintiff seeks to restrain and enjoin defendants from answering the complaint and proceeding in this case with former Chief of Staff to the Attorney General Matthew G. Whitaker appearing in the official capacity of the Acting Attorney General. Additionally, plaintiff seeks to substitute Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein as Acting Attorney General in his official capacity in place of former Attorney General Jefferson B. Sessions III, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25. 1. On November 7, 2018, Sessions submitted his resignation as Attorney General to President Trump. See Letter from Jefferson B. Sessions III to President Donald J. Trump (Nov. 7, 2018), available at https://cnn.it/2SVkdaQ (last accessed Nov. 12, 2018). Shortly thereafter, President Trump appointed Whitaker as the Acting Attorney General. See Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump), Twitter (Nov. 7, 2018, 11:44AM), https://bit.ly/2STEopE. As demonstrated in the Memorandum, the appointment of Whitaker as Acting Attorney General instead of Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein violates the Attorney General Succession Act, 28 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Kelty Beginning to Surge at the Fort
    V13 N33 Thursday, April 19, 2007 Kelty beginning to surge at the Fort By BRIAN A. HOWEY FORT WAYNE - With the primary just over two weeks away, a number of in- dicators point to a surge for architect Matt Kelty in his Republican primary mayoral race against Allen County 07 Commissioner Nelson Peters. The HPR Election Horse Race is mov- ing this contest from “Leans Peters” to “Tossup,” with, perhaps, a slight advantage to Kelty, a former aide to U.S. Sens. Richard Lugar and Dan Coats. Multiple sources tell HPR that Kelty is running an energetic, grassroots cam- Republican mayoral candidate Matt Kelty at his Fort Wayne headquarters. Polls and paign, similar to his 2002 challenge to State other indicators point to a surge in his campaign. (Fort Wayne Observed Photo) Rep. Winfield Moses Jr., a race Kelty lost by less than 100 votes. One source told HPR, “You go to past week, Peters called for a public referendum, saying Peters’ headquarters and it is solemn and you find one that he is working with Fort Wayne legislators to get the person working. You go to Kelty’s headquarters and it’s a referendum passed in the Indiana General Assembly. beehive of activity.” In a Wednesday Fort Wayne Journal Gazette But beyond that, Peters has reacted badly to the editorial, the newspaper wrote, “Nelson Peters’ last-second, Harrison Square project that would build a hotel, baseball short-sighted attempt to force a referendum on Harrison stadium and condos in downtown Fort Wayne. Peters origi- Square comes across as a desperate, crass, political at- nally supported Harrison Square and Kelty is opposed.
    [Show full text]
  • Coats & Pence in Trump's Reality
    V26, N7 Thursday, Sept. 24, 2020 Coats & Pence in Trump’s reality By early summer, Woodward’s book Pence and Coats had come around to ‘Rage’ details the Trump, with Pence looking for a political White House chaos lifeline on Trump’s ticket. with these 2 Hoosiers The two were not By BRIAN A. HOWEY only close person- INDIANAPOLIS – Up until ally, but politically. the May 2016 presidential primary, In April 2010, Pence Gov. Mike Pence and U.S. Sen. Dan endorsed Coats’s Coats had been GOP primary bid to backing U.S. Sen. return to the Sen- Ted Cruz for the ate, saying, “Dan Republican nomina- Coats’ integrity and tion. Donald Trump conservative record not only won that make him the best primary with 53% candidate for the of the vote, as he job. Dan is a proven exited the state, he conservative leader alleged that Cruz’s who is trusted by father had been involved in the con- Hoosiers. I know spiracy to assassinate President John Dan Coats well and F. Kennedy. Continued on page 3 SCOTUS and calm By MARK SOUDER FORT WAYNE – Most people would consider this to have already been a rather contentious election cycle. The death of America’s favorite liberal Supreme Court jus- tice, Ruth Bade Ginsburg, as the absentee ballot process “Well, we’re going to have to see has begun, should calm things down. what happens. I’ve been com- Yeah, right. While in historical terms plaining very strongly about this one lacks wars and assas- the ballots and the ballots are a sinations, or even an economic collapse, the personal anger disaster.
    [Show full text]
  • Matthew Whitaker, a Trump Loyalist, Is Seen As Ascendant Amid Rosenstein Chaos
    Matthew Whitaker, a Trump Loyalist, Is Seen as Ascendant Amid Rosenstein Chaos Matthew G. Whitaker, the chief of staff to Attorney General Jeff Sessions, has developed an amicable rapport with President Trump.CreditCharlie Neibergall/Associated Press Image Matthew G. Whitaker, the chief of staff to Attorney General Jeff Sessions, has developed an amicable rapport with President Trump.CreditCreditCharlie Neibergall/Associated Press By Katie Benner and Maggie Haberman Sept. 26, 2018 o o o o o Updated Nov. 7, 2018: President Trump forced out Attorney General Jeff Sessions on Wednesday and announced Matthew Whitaker, Mr. Sessions’s chief of staff, will take over as acting attorney general. Read the latest, here. WASHINGTON — Convinced that the deputy attorney general, Rod J. Rosenstein, was ready to resign after the revelation that he suggested President Trump was unfit for the job, senior White House aides got to work last weekend installing a replacement. Matthew G. Whitaker, the chief of staff to Attorney General Jeff Sessions, would become the acting No. 2 official at the Justice Department, his White House counterpart, John F. Kelly, told him over the phone on Saturday morning, according to two people briefed on the call. To the White House, he was an obvious choice: a confident former college football player and United States attorney whom Mr. Kelly has privately described as the West Wing’s “eyes and ears” in a department the president has long considered at war with him. By late Monday morning, the plan was moot. Mr. Rosenstein was no longer committed to resigning, at least without assurances he was doing so on amicable terms with the president.
    [Show full text]