DOCSLIB.ORG

Kelseya Uniflora K Ill

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

elseyaNewsletter of the Montana Native Plant Society Kelseya uniflora K ill. by Bonnie Heidel Important Plant Areas Update by Peter Lesica Pine Butte Peatlands The Pine Butte Peatlands IPA surrounds Pine Butte along the Rocky Mountain Front, about 15 miles west of Choteau. The Pine Butte Peatlands are possibly the largest peatland complex in Montana and include a large patterned area and several plant communities: (1) open fen1 dominated by sedges, small shrubs and mosses, (2) open fen dominated by hardstem bulrush, (3) dwarf carr2 dominated by bog birch, shrubby cinquefoil and Baltic rush, (4) carr dominated by large willows and birch. In addition, there are two types of wetland community on mineral soil rather than peat. Marsh vegetation is dominated by cattails, bulrush and beaked sedge and wet meadows supporting shrubby Pine Butte Fen. Photo by Dave Hanna cinquefoil, tufted hairgrass and Nebraska sedge. Due to the spatial distribution of wetland vegetation, some upland grassland and aspen communities are also included within the IPA boundary. The Pine Butte Peatlands IPA provides habitat for 13 species of concern that are considered rare in Montana, although more common elsewhere. Many of these populations are very large. Braya humilis, Primula incana, Carex crawei and Juncus acuminatus occur as small populations in discrete habitat patches. Salix serissima. Photo by Dave Hanna Eleocharis rostellata and Trichophorum cespitosum occur as large but localized populations in open fen and dwarf Gentianopsis macounii. carr communities. Gentianopsis macounii, Kobresia Photo by Dave Hanna simpliciuscula and Trichophorum pumilum are widespread The Pine Butte Peatlands are fed primarily by sub- in open fen and dwarf carr communities. Salix serissima surface water from the Teton River moving through is widespread in dwarf carr and localized in carr intervening alluvial deposits. Maintenance of the communities. The mosses, Cinclidium stygium, Meesia functional hydrologic system from the Teton River triquetra and Scorpidium scorpioides, are widespread in watershed to the Teton River and surrounding substrates open fen communities. continued on page 3 VOLUME 26 NO. 1 I FALL 2012 Chapter Events Calypso Chapter Wednesday, 11/28, 7 pm. [Note date change due to The Chapter had a very successful spring field trip season and Thanksgiving Holiday.] Join botanist Mel Waggy and Terry members are looking forward to regrouping this fall with a Divoky from Windflower Nursery as they present “From program in November and the winter brunch in December. the Mountains to the Prairies: Conservation Efforts at the For information about Chapter programs and events, contact MPG Ranch.” The ranch encompasses about 10,000 acres Catherine Cain, 498-6198 or [email protected]. that include parts of the forested Sapphire Range, large grasslands and four miles of Bitterroot River riparian plant Clark Fork Chapter communities. Chapter meetings are held the second Thursday of the month at 7:30 pm in Room L09, Gallagher Business Bldg., UM, unless Wednesday, 12/19, 5:30 pm. Annual Christmas Party. The otherwise noted. gathering is at Edd and Betty Kuropat’s house, 2688 Witty Lane, Columbia Falls. Bring a potluck dish, beverages and an Thursday, 10/11. “Digital Macro Photography Demystified.” inexpensive or recycled gift for exchange. Watch your email Digital cameras have made photography a lot easier, but for directions. Info: Betty at 892-0129. close-ups of wildflowers are still a challenge. Clare Beelman and Ken Stolz, two of our most dedicated photographers, will give us important tips and some hands-on help. So bring your Kelsey Chapter For information about upcoming Chapter events and camera and the instruction book that came with it and join us! programs, contact Kathy Lloyd, 449-6586 Thursday, 11/8. “How Surprising Complexities in Historical Wednesday, 11/7, 7:00 pm. “Wildflowers of the Utah Fire Patterns Shaped Today’s Forests.” Elaine Sutherland has Canyon Country.” Peter Lesica, author of the new “Manual been studying Montana’s forests for the U.S. Forest Service of Montana Vascular Plants,” presents this prgoram at the for the past two decades. Come listen to her tell the story. Lewis and Clark Library. The event is free and open to the public. Thursday, 12/13, 6:30 pm. Our annual Christmas potluck will again be held in the Del Brown Room, Turner Hall, UM campus on the northwest side of the Oval. With luck, parking will be Maka Flora Chapter available west of the Gallagher Business Bldg., in lots or on For information about upcoming Chapter events and the streets off Arthur Ave. and Connell St. We will email a map programs, contact Libby Knotts, 774-3778 or rek@midrivers. in early December. Bring plates, utensils and a dish to share. net. Alcoholic beverages are okay! Don’t forget to bring a few of your favorite slides or digital pictures from the summer. Info: Valley of Flowers Chapter Peter, 728-8740 or Kelly, 258-5439. Meetings are held on the second Tuesday of each month from October through March at 7 pm in Room 108, Plant Flathead Chapter Biosciences Building, unless otherwise noted. Chapter meetings are held the third Wednesday of October, November and January through April at Teakettle Community Tuesday, 10/9. Program to be announced. Hall, 235 Nucleus Ave., Columbia Falls, unless otherwise noted [Note new location]. Programs begin at 7 pm; members are Tuesday, 11/13. “Digital Resources for Plant Information.” encouraged to come to the 5:30 business meeting beforehand Katie Gibson will speak about the smart phone application to discuss and help plan Chapter activities. Feel free to bring for native plant identification that she and Whitney Tilt have a sack supper. For more information, contact Rachel Potter, developed. She will demonstrate the “Flora of Yellowstone” 892-2446 or Jen Hintz, 270-7028. and tell us about similar projects they have going. Also, Matt Lavin will discuss the www.pnwherbaria.org site, which is a Wednesday, 10/17, 5:30 pm. Potluck Dinner. We’ll be sharing bit improved since his last presentation on it, and also talk adventures from the summer and planning events in the about Google, Flickr and USDA Plants Database. coming year. With no program, this evening gives us more time for socializing, getting to know other members and Tuesday, 12/11. Holiday Potluck. Details to be announced. catching up. Bring dishes, utensils and some food to share. 2 IPAs, continued is crucial to the existence of the Pine Butte Peatlands. While the importance of these areas outside the IPA boundaries is recognized, they were not included within the IPA since current threats to hydrologic function between the Teton River and the peatlands appear limited. 1Fen is an area of saturated peat that receives water from surface and subsurface sources, and is dominated by herbaceous vegetation. 2Carr also is an area of saturated peat, but the dominant vegetation is woody. South Pryor Mountains The South Pryor Mountains IPA is located in Carbon County about 50 miles south of Billings between the Bighorn River to South Pryor Mountains IPA. Photos by Peter Lesica. the west, the Clark’s Fork of the Yellowstone River to the east and the Wyoming state line to the south. The South Pryor Mountains IPA supports a large number of plants considered species of concern in Montana. The majority of these are plants with affinities to the Great Basin floristic province. They are more common in Wyoming and Utah but reach the northern margin of their range in the South Pryor Mountains area. These include Astragalus aretioides, Astragalus geyeri, Boechera demissa, Camissonia andina, Camissonia parvula, Cleome lutea, Eriogonum salsuginosum, Grayia spinosa, Leptodactylon caespitosum, Malacothrix torreyi, Mentzelia pumila, Nama densum, Stipa lettermanii and the lichen Rhizoplaca haydenii. Five species of vascular plants in the IPA are globally rare, being endemic to the north end of the Bighorn Basin of Montana and Wyoming: Erigeron allocotus, Penstemon caryi, Physaria lesicii, Shoshonea pulvinata and Sullivantia hapemanii. The IPA encompasses the entire known range or a significant portion of the known populations of these species within Montana. The South Pryor Mountains IPA has 5,000 feet of vertical relief and supports roughly 29 distinct plant communities (DeVelice and Lesica, 1993). Forests and woodlands dominated by limber pine occur on warm, often exposed, stony-soil slopes at or above 6,500 feet. Douglas-fir forests occur on slopes between 5,000-7,000 feet. Woodlands dominated by Utah juniper occur on shallow, calcareous soil of slopes and ridges at 4,000-6,000 feet. Limber pine-juniper woodlands are found on shallow, calcareous soils of slopes between 4,000-5,300 feet. Shrublands dominated by black sagebrush and big sagebrush occur at 4,200- 6,700 feet on slopes, ridgetops and benches. Toeslopes, terraces and alluvial fans at 3,800-5,300 feet, often with heavy soil, support shrublands dominated by big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata), bird’s-foot sagebrush (Artemisia pedatifida), black greasewood (Sarcobatus vermiculatus) and Gardner’s saltbush (Atriplex gardneri). Idaho fescue grasslands occur above 8,000 feet on gentle slopes. Grasslands dominated by bluebunch wheatgrass and cushion plants are common on gravelly soils of low-elevation ridgetops and upper slopes. Townsendia spathulata. Photo by Peter Lesica 3 News & Notes 2013 Small Grant Competition Open MNPS Committee Update: by Linda Lyon Conservation Goals by Peter Lesica The Montana Native Plant Society (MNPS) announces the 17th annual Small Grant competition The Agricultural Research Service (ARS), part of for projects or studies that support the small grant the U.S. Department of Agriculture, has introduced program objectives to: 1) stimulate research, many Asian and European plants for agricultural conservation and educational activities that help purposes. Some of these plants, such as tamarisk foster an appreciation of Montana’s native plants (Tamarix spp.) have become serious weeds.
Recommended publications
  • Sagebrush Establishment on Mine Lands

    Sagebrush Establishment on Mine Lands

    2000 Billings Land Reclamation Symposium BIG SAGEBRUSH (ARTEMISIA TRIDENTATA) COMMUNITIES - ECOLOGY, IMPORTANCE AND RESTORATION POTENTIAL Stephen B. Monsen and Nancy L. Shaw Abstract Big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata Nutt.) is the most common and widespread sagebrush species in the Intermountain region. Climatic patterns, elevation gradients, soil characteristics and fire are among the factors regulating the distribution of its three major subspecies. Each of these subspecies is considered a topographic climax dominant. Reproductive strategies of big sagebrush subspecies have evolved that favor the development of both regional and localized populations. Sagebrush communities are extremely valuable natural resources. They provide ground cover and soil stability as well as habitat for various ungulates, birds, reptiles and invertebrates. Species composition of these communities is quite complex and includes plants that interface with more arid and more mesic environments. Large areas of big sagebrush rangelands have been altered by destructive grazing, conversion to introduced perennial grasses through artificial seeding and invasion of annual weeds, principally cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum L.). Dried cheatgrass forms continuous mats of fine fuels that ignite and burn more frequently than native herbs. As a result, extensive tracts of sagebrush between the Sierra Nevada and Rocky Mountains are rapidly being converted to annual grasslands. In some areas recent introductions of perennial weeds are now displacing the annuals. The current weed invasions and their impacts on native ecosystems are recent ecological events of unprecedented magnitude. Restoration of degraded big sagebrush communities and reduction of further losses pose major challenges to land managers. Loss of wildlife habitat and recent invasion of perennial weeds into seedings of introduced species highlight the need to stem losses and restore native vegetation where possible.
  • Washington Plant List Douglas County by Scientific Name

    Washington Plant List Douglas County by Scientific Name

    The NatureMapping Program Washington Plant List Revised: 9/15/2011 Douglas County by Scientific Name (1) Non- native, (2) ID Scientific Name Common Name Plant Family Invasive √ 763 Acer glabrum Douglas maple Aceraceae 800 Alisma graminium Narrowleaf waterplantain Alismataceae 19 Alisma plantago-aquatica American waterplantain Alismataceae 1087 Rhus glabra Sumac Anacardiaceae 650 Rhus radicans Poison ivy Anacardiaceae 29 Angelica arguta Sharp-tooth angelica Apiaceae 809 Angelica canbyi Canby's angelica Apiaceae 915 Cymopteris terebinthinus Turpentine spring-parsley Apiaceae 167 Heracleum lanatum Cow parsnip Apiaceae 991 Ligusticum grayi Gray's lovage Apiaceae 709 Lomatium ambiguum Swale desert-parsley Apiaceae 997 Lomatium canbyi Canby's desert-parsley Apiaceae 573 Lomatium dissectum Fern-leaf biscuit-root Apiaceae 582 Lomatium geyeri Geyer's desert-parsley Apiaceae 586 Lomatium gormanii Gorman's desert-parsley Apiaceae 998 Lomatium grayi Gray's desert-parsley Apiaceae 999 Lomatium hambleniae Hamblen's desert-parsley Apiaceae 609 Lomatium macrocarpum Large-fruited lomatium Apiaceae 1000 Lomatium nudicaule Pestle parsnip Apiaceae 634 Lomatium triternatum Nine-leaf lomatium Apiaceae 474 Osmorhiza chilensis Sweet-cicely Apiaceae 264 Osmorhiza occidentalis Western sweet-cicely Apiaceae 1044 Osmorhiza purpurea Purple sweet-cicely Apiaceae 492 Sanicula graveolens Northern Sierra) sanicle Apiaceae 699 Apocynum androsaemifolium Spreading dogbane Apocynaceae 813 Apocynum cannabinum Hemp dogbane Apocynaceae 681 Asclepias speciosa Showy milkweed Asclepiadaceae
  • Autumn Willow in Rocky Mountain Region the Black Hills National

    Autumn Willow in Rocky Mountain Region the Black Hills National

    United States Department of Agriculture Conservation Assessment Forest Service for the Autumn Willow in Rocky Mountain Region the Black Hills National Black Hills National Forest, South Dakota and Forest Custer, South Dakota Wyoming April 2003 J.Hope Hornbeck, Carolyn Hull Sieg, and Deanna J. Reyher Species Assessment of Autumn willow in the Black Hills National Forest, South Dakota and Wyoming J. Hope Hornbeck, Carolyn Hull Sieg and Deanna J. Reyher J. Hope Hornbeck is a Botanist with the Black Hills National Forest in Custer, South Dakota. She completed a B.S. in Environmental Biology (botany emphasis) at The University of Montana and a M.S. in Plant Biology (plant community ecology emphasis) at the University of Minnesota-Twin Cities. Carolyn Hull Sieg is a Research Plant Ecologist with the Rocky Mountain Research Station in Flagstaff, Arizona. She completed a B.S. in Wildlife Biology and M.S. in Range Science from Colorado State University and a Ph.D. in Range and Wildlife Management (fire ecology) at Texas Tech University. Deanna J. Reyher is Ecologist/Soil Scientist with the Black Hills National Forest in Custer, South Dakota. She completed a B.S. degree in Agronomy (soil science and crop production emphasis) from the University of Nebraska – Lincoln. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Autumn willow, Salix serissima (Bailey) Fern., is an obligate wetland shrub that occurs in fens and bogs in the northeastern United States and eastern Canada. Disjunct populations of autumn willow occur in the Black Hills of South Dakota. Only two populations occur on Black Hills National Forest lands: a large population at McIntosh Fen and a small population on Middle Boxelder Creek.
  • Types of Sagebrush Updated (Artemisia Subg. Tridentatae

    Types of Sagebrush Updated (Artemisia Subg. Tridentatae

    Mosyakin, S.L., L.M. Shultz & G.V. Boiko. 2017. Types of sagebrush updated ( Artemisia subg. Tridentatae, Asteraceae): miscellaneous comments and additional specimens from the Besser and Turczaninov memorial herbaria (KW). Phytoneuron 2017-25: 1–20. Published 6 April 2017. ISSN 2153 733X TYPES OF SAGEBRUSH UPDATED (ARTEMISIA SUBG. TRIDENTATAE , ASTERACEAE): MISCELLANEOUS COMMENTS AND ADDITIONAL SPECIMENS FROM THE BESSER AND TURCZANINOV MEMORIAL HERBARIA (KW) SERGEI L. MOSYAKIN M.G. Kholodny Institute of Botany National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine 2 Tereshchenkivska Street Kiev (Kyiv), 01004 Ukraine [email protected] LEILA M. SHULTZ Department of Wildland Resources, NR 329 Utah State University Logan, Utah 84322-5230, USA [email protected] GANNA V. BOIKO M.G. Kholodny Institute of Botany National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine 2 Tereshchenkivska Street Kiev (Kyiv), 01004 Ukraine [email protected] ABSTRACT Corrections and additions are provided for the existing typifications of plant names in Artemisia subg. Tridentatae . In particular, second-step lectotypifications are proposed for the names Artemisia trifida Nutt., nom. illeg. (A. tripartita Rydb., the currently accepted replacement name), A. fischeriana Besser (= A. californica Lessing, the currently accepted name), and A. pedatifida Nutt. For several nomenclatural types of names listed in earlier publications as "holotypes," the type designations are corrected to lectotypes (Art. 9.9. of ICN ). Newly discovered authentic specimens (mostly isolectotypes) of several names in the group are listed and discussed, mainly based on specimens deposited in the Besser and Turczaninov memorial herbaria at the National Herbarium of Ukraine (KW). The Turczaninov herbarium is particularly rich in Nuttall's specimens, which are often better represented and better preserved than corresponding specimens available from BM, GH, K, PH, and some other major herbaria.
  • Botanical Name Common Name

    Botanical Name Common Name

    Approved Approved & as a eligible to Not eligible to Approved as Frontage fulfill other fulfill other Type of plant a Street Tree Tree standards standards Heritage Tree Tree Heritage Species Botanical Name Common name Native Abelia x grandiflora Glossy Abelia Shrub, Deciduous No No No Yes White Forsytha; Korean Abeliophyllum distichum Shrub, Deciduous No No No Yes Abelialeaf Acanthropanax Fiveleaf Aralia Shrub, Deciduous No No No Yes sieboldianus Acer ginnala Amur Maple Shrub, Deciduous No No No Yes Aesculus parviflora Bottlebrush Buckeye Shrub, Deciduous No No No Yes Aesculus pavia Red Buckeye Shrub, Deciduous No No Yes Yes Alnus incana ssp. rugosa Speckled Alder Shrub, Deciduous Yes No No Yes Alnus serrulata Hazel Alder Shrub, Deciduous Yes No No Yes Amelanchier humilis Low Serviceberry Shrub, Deciduous Yes No No Yes Amelanchier stolonifera Running Serviceberry Shrub, Deciduous Yes No No Yes False Indigo Bush; Amorpha fruticosa Desert False Indigo; Shrub, Deciduous Yes No No No Not eligible Bastard Indigo Aronia arbutifolia Red Chokeberry Shrub, Deciduous Yes No No Yes Aronia melanocarpa Black Chokeberry Shrub, Deciduous Yes No No Yes Aronia prunifolia Purple Chokeberry Shrub, Deciduous Yes No No Yes Groundsel-Bush; Eastern Baccharis halimifolia Shrub, Deciduous No No Yes Yes Baccharis Summer Cypress; Bassia scoparia Shrub, Deciduous No No No Yes Burning-Bush Berberis canadensis American Barberry Shrub, Deciduous Yes No No Yes Common Barberry; Berberis vulgaris Shrub, Deciduous No No No No Not eligible European Barberry Betula pumila
  • Porter's Sagebrush Is Endemic to the Wind River and Powder River Basins in Central Wyoming

    Porter's Sagebrush Is Endemic to the Wind River and Powder River Basins in Central Wyoming

    Status of Porter’s Sagebrush (Artemisia porteri) in Wyoming Prepared for the Bureau of Land Management Wyoming State Office And Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, University of Wyoming By Walter Fertig Botanical Consultant 1117 West Grand Canyon Dr. Kanab, UT 84741 25 September 2002 Agreement # K910-A4-0011 Task Order No. TO-09 ABSTRACT Porter's sagebrush is endemic to the Wind River and Powder River basins in central Wyoming. It is found primarily in sparsely vegetated Artemisia pedatifida, A. longifolia, or A. porteri communities on barren clay or ashy badlands, flats, or gullies derived from the Wind River, Wagon Bed, or Frontier formations. This species is currently known from 11 extant occurrences consisting of at least 60 subpopulations covering less than 1250 acres. Individual colonies typically number from 100-1000 individuals and occupy areas of 1-50 acres. Based on surveys in 1999, the current population of Porter's sagebrush is conservatively estimated at 50,000-75,000 plants. Porter's sagebrush is primarily threatened by mineral development (oil, natural gas and uranium) within its limited range and specialized habitat. This species was designated as Sensitive by the BLM in 2001 and occurs primarily on BLM lands in the Buffalo, Casper, and Lander field offices. No populations currently receive formal protection, although the population in the Lysite Badlands is managed under special use regulations in the BLM Lander Resource Area Resource Management Plan. Porter's sagebrush is now known to be more widespread and abundant in Wyoming than previously suspected. Until sufficient habitat is afforded protection or management strategies are developed and implemented for this species in mineral extraction areas, A.
  • Botanical Survey of Strawberry Lake Fen, Arapaho National Forest

    Botanical Survey of Strawberry Lake Fen, Arapaho National Forest

    BOTANICAL SURVEY OF WINTER PARK RESORT, ARAPAHO NATIONAL FOREST, GRAND COUNTY, COLORADO Colorado Natural Heritage Program College of Natural Resources, 8002 Campus Delivery Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado 80523-8002 BOTANICAL SURVEY OF WINTER PARK RESORT, ARAPAHO NATIONAL FOREST, GRAND COUNTY, COLORADO Prepared for: Doug Laraby, Winter Park Resort P.O. Box 36 Winter Park, CO 80482 and U.S. Forest Service Arapaho-Roosevelt National Forests and Pawnee National Grassland, Supervisor’s Office 240 West Prospect Fort Collins, CO 80526 Prepared by: David G. Anderson and Jill E. Handwerk January 26, 2005 Colorado Natural Heritage Program (CNHP) College of Natural Resources 8002 Campus Delivery Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado 80523-8002 Cover photograph: Botrychium c.f. echo at Prospector Chairlift, Winter Park Resort. Photo taken by: David G. Anderson TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................... 1 BOTANICAL SURVEY OF PARSENN PEAK..................................................................................... 2 BOTANICAL SURVEY OF BACKSIDE PARSENN PEAK IMPROVEMENT AREA (AREA G) ............... 2 BOTANICAL SURVEY OF THE AREA AFFECTED BY PROPOSED SUMMIT EXPRESS CHAIRLIFT REPLACEMENT............................................................................................................................. 2 TIMED MOONWORT (BOTRYCHIUM SSP.) SURVEYS...................................................................
  • Rediscovery of Colorado's Historic Festuca Hallii (Hall Fescue) Sites

    Rediscovery of Colorado's Historic Festuca Hallii (Hall Fescue) Sites

    Rediscovery of Colorado’s Historic Festuca hallii (Hall Fescue) Sites on Cameron Mountain and in Shipman Park Roosevelt National Forest September 9, 2014 Festuca hallii on Cameron Mountain. Prepared for: Steve Popovich Forest Botanist Arapaho-Roosevelt National Forests BY: TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 3 2.0 Festuca hallii ............................................................................................................................ 3 2.1 Natural History...................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Distribution ........................................................................................................................... 4 3.0 Field Survey Methods and Results ........................................................................................... 4 Figure 1: Inflorescence of Festuca hallii from Cameron Mountain. ...................................... 5 Figure 2: Location of Cameron Mountain and Shipman Park Sites (Topo). .......................... 6 Figure 3: Location of Cameron Mountain and Shipman Park Sites (Aerial). ........................ 7 Cameron Mountain ..................................................................................................................... 8 Figure 4: Festuca hallii on Cameron Peak ............................................................................. 9
  • Ecological Site DX032X01B143 Saline Upland Clayey (SUC) Big Horn Basin Rim

    Ecological Site DX032X01B143 Saline Upland Clayey (SUC) Big Horn Basin Rim

    Natural Resources Conservation Service Ecological site DX032X01B143 Saline Upland Clayey (SUC) Big Horn Basin Rim Last updated: 9/17/2020 Accessed: 09/30/2021 General information MLRA notes Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 032X–Northern Intermountain Desertic Basins 032X–Northern Intermountain Desertic Basins–This MLRA is comprised of two major basins, the Big Horn and the Wind River. These two basins are distinctly different and are split by Land Resource Units (LRUs) to allow individual Ecological Site Descriptions (ESD). These warm basins are surrounded by uplifts and rimmed by mountains, creating a unique set of plant responses and communities. Unique characteristics of the geology and geomorphology single out these two basins. For further information regarding Major Land Resource Areas (MLRAs), refer to: United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2006. Land Resource Regions and Major Land Resource Areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296. Available electronically at: http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/ref/? cid=nrcs142p2_053624#handbook. LRU notes Land Resource Unit (LRU) and Subset: 32X01B (WY) This LRU consists of the Big Horn Basin within MLRA 32. The Big Horn Basin is lower in elevation, slightly warmer and receives slightly less overall precipitation compared to the Wind River Basin (LRU 02). This LRU was originally divided into two: LRU A, which was the core and LRU B, which was the rim. With the most current standards, this LRU is divided into two subsets. This subset is Subset B, referred to as the Rim, is a transitional band between the basin floor and the lower foothills.
  • Supplementary Materials

    Supplementary Materials

    Supplementary Materials A Fruita (1380m) 1902-2012 10.3C 231mm 300 C mm 50 100 40 80 34.0 30 60 20 40 -11.6 10 20 0 0 -10 J F M A M J J A S O N D B GJ Walker Field (1477m) 1900-2015 9.4C 223mm 300 C mm 50 100 40 80 33.8 30 60 20 40 0.2 10 20 0 0 J F M A M J J A S O N D C Montrose 1 (1763m) 1905-1982 9C 239mm 300 C mm 50 100 40 80 31.3 30 60 20 40 -10.8 10 20 0 0 -10 J F M A M J J A S O N D Figure S1. Walter-Leith climate diagrams based on data retrieved from National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) weather stations at A) Fruita (1902 - 2012), B) Grand Junction (Walker Field 1900 - 2015), and C) Montrose (1905 - 1982), all in Colorado (NCDC 2015). Blue hatched areas indicate moist seasons, red dotted areas indicate dry seasons, and months with possible (light blue) and likely (dark blue) frost are indicated by horizontal bars. 1 Table S1. Native plant species characteristic of salt desert ecosystems of intermountain west of North America based on review of the literature. Nomenclature follows NRCS (2015). Family Species Common name Reference Succulent Agavaceae Yucca glauca soapweed yucca 1 Cactaceae Echinocereus spp. hedgehog cactus 1 Mammillaria spp. -- 2 Opuntia engelmannii cactus apple 1, 3 Opuntia sp. Pricklypear 2, 4 Annual/biennial forbs Asteraceae Chaenactis stevioides Esteve's pincushion 4 Boraginaceae Cryptantha elata cliffdweller's cryptantha 2, 3 Lappula occidentalis var.
  • Cushion-Plant Vegetation on Public Lands in the Blm Rock Springs Field Office, Wyoming

    Cushion-Plant Vegetation on Public Lands in the Blm Rock Springs Field Office, Wyoming

    CUSHION-PLANT VEGETATION ON PUBLIC LANDS IN THE BLM ROCK SPRINGS FIELD OFFICE, WYOMING Final Report for Assistance Agreement KAA010012, Task Order No. TO-13 between the BLM Rock Springs Field Office, and the University of Wyoming, Wyoming Natural Diversity Database By George P. Jones Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, University of Wyoming Laramie, Wyoming October 18, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ........................................................................................................................................... 1 Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Methods ........................................................................................................................................... 3 Sample Area Selection ................................................................................................................ 3 Data Collection ............................................................................................................................ 4 Data Analysis .............................................................................................................................. 5 Results ............................................................................................................................................. 7
  • Appendix L US Forest Service Wildlife Specialist Report

    Appendix L US Forest Service Wildlife Specialist Report

    Appendix L US Forest Service Wildlife Specialist Report L. US Forest Service Wildlife Specialist Report 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 WILDLIFE SPECIALIST REPORT.......................................................................................... 1 3 I. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 1 4 II. PROJECT HISTORY .................................................................................................... 1 5 III. PURPOSE AND NEED ................................................................................................. 2 6 IV. DESCRIPTION OF THE ALTERNATIVES ................................................................ 2 7 V. ANALYSIS AREA ........................................................................................................ 4 8 VI. THREATENED, ENDANGERED, PROPOSED AND CANDIDATE SPECIES ....... 7 9 VII. USFS SENSITIVE SPECIES ON THE ROUTT NATIONAL FOREST ................. 14 10 A. Greater sage-grouse ................................................................................................ 29 11 B. Amphibians ............................................................................................................. 32 12 C. Birds ........................................................................................................................ 33 13 D. Fish .......................................................................................................................... 36 14 E. Plants ......................................................................................................................